OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

_Marmaduke_ (HEINEMANN) has this peculiarity, that the title rôle is by

no means its most important or interesting character. Indeed it might

with more propriety have been called _Marrion_, since hers is not only

the central figure in the plot, but emphatically the one over which Mrs.

F. A. Steel has expended most care and affection. Moreover the untimely

death of _Marmaduke_ leaves _Marrion_ to carry on the story for several

chapters practically single-handed. I am bound to say, however, that at

no stage did she get much help from her colleagues, all of whom--the

gouty old father and his intriguing wife, the faithful servant, even

debonair _Marmaduke_ himself--bear a certain air of familiarity. But if

frequent usage has something lessened their vitality, _Marrion_ is a

living and credible human being, whether as daughter of a supposed

valet, adoring from afar the gay young ensign, or as the unacknowledged

wife of _Marmaduke_ and mother of his child, or later as an army nurse

amid the horrors of Crimean mismanagement. Later still, when the long

arm of coincidence (making a greater stretch than I should have expected

under Mrs. Steel's direction) brought _Marrion_ to the bedside of her

parent in a hospital tent, and converted her into a Polish princess, I

lost a little of my whole-hearted belief in her actuality. There are

really two parts to the tale--the Scotch courtship, with its intrigues,

frustrated elopements, _et hoc genus omne_; and the scenes, very

graphically written, of active service at Varna and Inkerman. I will not

pretend that the two parts are specially coherent; but at least Mrs.

Steel has given us some exceedingly interesting pictures of a period

that our novelists have, on the whole, unaccountably neglected.

* * * * *

_The Experiments of Ganymede Bunn_ (HUTCHINSON) is like to command a

wide audience. Its appeal will equally be to the lovers of Irish scenes,

to those who affect stories about horses and hunting, and to the

countless myriads who are fond of imagining what they would do with an

unexpected legacy. It was this last that happened to _Ganymede_, who was

left seventeen thousand pounds by an aunt called _Juno_ (the names of

this family are not the least demand that Miss Dorothea Conyers makes

upon your credulity). My mention of horses and Ireland shows you what he

does with his money, and where. It does not, however, indicate the

result, which is a happy variant upon what is usual in such cases. You

know already, I imagine, the special qualities to be looked for in a

tale by Miss Conyers--chief among them a rather baffling inability to

lie a straight course. If I may borrow a metaphor from her own favourite

theme, she is for ever dashing off on some alluring cross-scent. More

important, fortunately, than this is the enjoyment which she clearly has

in writing her stories and passes briskly on to the reader. There's a

fine tang of the open-air about them, and a smell of saddle-leather,

that many persons will consider well worth all the intricacies of your

problem-novelists. I had the idea that her honest vulgar little legatee

and his speculations as a horse-breeder might make a good subject for a

character-comedian; but I suppose the late LORD GEORGE SANGER is the

only man who could have produced the right equine cast.

* * * * *

The component elements of _The White Rook_ (CHAPMAN AND HALL) may be

summarised in the picturesque argot of Army Ordnance somewhat as

follows: Chinamen, inscrutable, complete with mysterious drugs, one;

wives, misunderstood, Mark I, one; husbands, unsympathetic (for purposes

of assassination only), one; _ingénues_, Mark II, one; heroes, one;

squires, brutal, one; murders of sorts, three; ditto, attempted,

several. The inscrutable one is responsible for all the murders. Only

the merest accident, it seems, prevents him from disposing of the few

fortunate characters who survive to the concluding chapters of the

story. He narrowly misses the misunderstood wife (now a widow, thanks to

his kind offices), and his failure to bag the hero and _ingénue_

(together with a handful of subsidiary characters) is only a matter of

minutes. There is almost a false note about the last chapter, in which

the Oriental commits suicide before he has completed his grisly task;

but it was obviously impossible for anyone in the book to live happily

ever after so long as he remained alive. Just how Mr. HARRIS BURLAND and

the villainous figment of his lively imagination perform these deeds of

dastard-do is not for me to reveal. The publishers modestly claim that

in the school of WILKIE COLLINS this author has few rivals. As regards

complexity of plot the claim is scarcely substantiated by the volume

before me; but if bloodshed be the food of fiction Mr. BURLAND may slay

on, secure in his pre-eminence.

* * * * *

The _Rev. Frank Farmer_, hero of Mr. RICHARD MARSH'S _The Deacon's

Daughter_ (LONG), was the youthful, good-looking and eloquent

Congregationalist minister of the very local town of Brasted, and the

ladies of his flock adored him. So earnestly indeed did they adore him

that, after he had preached a stirring series of sermons on the evils of

gambling, they decided to subscribe and send him for a holiday to Monte

Carlo. On his return he was to preach another course of sermons, which

"would rouse the national conscience and, with God's blessing, the

conscience of all Europe." Possibly you can guess what happened to him;

I did, and I am not a good guesser. The _Rev. Frank_ had never been out

of England, and he found Monte Carlo inhabited by ladies who made him

blush. He could not understand their bold ways, so different from the

manner of the Brasted maidens. One of them laid especial siege to him

and assured him that he had "_la veine_." At first I am inclined to

believe that he thought she was talking of something varicose, but when

he understood what she meant he was at her mercy. In short he tried his

luck, to the dismay of his conscience but with prodigious benefit to his

pocket. His return to Brasted is described with excellent irony.

* * * * *

Mr. WILL IRWIN'S war-book naturally divides itself into two parts, since

he was lucky enough to get near the Front both about Verdun during the

great attack, and with the Alpini fighting on "the roof of Armageddon."

To these brave and picturesque friends of ours he dedicates his study,

_The Latin at War_ (CONSTABLE). You must not expect much of that inside

information which the author, as an American journalist, must have been

sorely tempted to produce. Indeed he has little to offer us that has not

been common property of the Correspondents for long enough, and several

of his descriptions (his picture of a glacier, for one), given with a

rather irritatingly childlike air of new discovery, cannot escape the

charge of commonplace. But his reflections, for once in a way the better

half of experience, more than make good this defect. His essay on Paris,

for instance--"the city of unshed tears"--is something more than

interesting, and his analysis of the cause of the successes of the

French army, in the face of initial defects of material, even better.

The author of _Westward Ho!_, considering the Spanish and English navies

of ELIZABETH'S time, found precisely the same contrasted elements of

autocracy and brotherliness producing just those results that we find

respectively in the German and French forces of to-day--on the one hand

a mechanical perfection of command, on the other an informed equality

which, somehow, does not make against efficiency whilst fostering

individuality. Mr. IRWIN hardly refers to our own Army; but one is

thankful to remember that discipline by consent, one of the virtues of

true democracy, is not the exclusive tradition of our French allies.

* * * * *

_A London Posy_ (MILLS AND BOON) is a story with at least an original

setting. So far as I know, Miss SOPHIE COLE is the first novelist to

group her characters about an actual London house preserved as a memorial

to former inhabitants. The house in question is that in Gough Square,

where Dr. JOHNSON lived, and two of the chief characters are _George

Constant_, the curator, and his sister, to whom the shrine is the most

precious object in life ("housemaid to a ghost," one of the other

personages rather prettily calls her). It therefore may well be that to

ardent devotees of the great lexicographer this story of what might have

happened in his house to-day will make a stronger appeal than was the

case with me, who (to speak frankly) found it a trifle dull. It might be

said, though perhaps unkindly, that Miss COLE looks at life through such

feminine eyes that all her characters, male and female, are types of

perfect womanhood. In _Denis Laurie_, the gentle essayist and recluse,

one might expect to find some feminine attributes; but even the bolder

and badder lots, whose task it is to supply the melodramatic relief,

struck me as oddly unvirile. But this is only a personal view. Others,

as I say, may find this very gentle story of mild loves and two deserted

wives a refreshing contrast to the truths, so much stranger and more

lurid than any fiction, by which we are surrounded.

* * * * *

[Illustration: [Owing to a scarcity of literary matter at the Front, our

soldiers are sometimes reduced to telling each other tales.]

Private Jones. "AND SHE _SAYS_, 'OH! WOT BLINKIN' GREAT EYES YOU 'AVE,

GRANDMOTHER!' AND THE WOLF, 'E SAYS, 'ALL THE BETTER TER SEE YER WIV, MY

DEAR.'"]

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 153, July 11, 1917 · 第 36 / 37 题