EMETIC TARTAR.[299] _Tartarized Antimony._

This saline body appears in the state of white crystals, whose primitive

figure is the regular tetrahedron, although it assumes a variety of

secondary forms. Its chemical composition is still involved in some

obscurity; it is stated, in the different dispensatories, to be a triple

salt, consisting of tartaric acid, oxide of antimony, and potass, and

that it ought therefore, according to the principles of the reformed

nomenclature, to be termed a _Tartrate of Antimony and Potass_. The

truth of these views, however, we have already[300] ventured to

question; _Gay Lussac_ has stated that in the various metalline

compounds of which _Super-tartrate of Potass_ is an ingredient, this

latter substance acts the part of a simple acid; an opinion which

receives considerable support from the great solvent property of _cream

of tartar_, and from the striking fact that it is even capable of

dissolving various oxides which are insoluble in tartaric acid, of which

the protoxide of antimony is an example. In such a state of doubt, a

better name could not be found than that of _tartarized antimony_.

The salt, according to _Dr. Duncan_, is soluble in three times its

weight of distilled water at 212° _Fah._ and in fifteen, at 60°.

When it is heated red hot in an earthen crucible, it blackens, and

undergoes decomposition like a vegetable body, leaving a residuum of

metallic antimony, and slightly carbonated potass.

_Symptoms of Poisoning by Emetic Tartar._

A question has arisen whether this salt can be considered as a poison,

capable of occasioning death? In general where a large dose has been

administered, it is all rejected by the vomiting which it excites; we

accordingly find in the works of _Morgagni_ and other pathologists, the

history of various cases in proof of the innocence of this salt.

_Hoffman_, however, relates the case of a woman who experienced very

severe symptoms shortly after having taken tartar emetic, and that she

ultimately died,[301] and there are other similar instances recorded in

the works of _Foderé_ and _Orfila_. It also deserves notice, that

tartarized antimony is very liable to produce deleterious effects,

where, from the insensibility of the nervous system, the operation of

vomiting cannot be excited, as in apoplexy, drunkenness, and in that

state of coma, which follows the ingestion of narcotic vegetables. _M.

Cloquet_ communicated to _Orfila_ a case highly illustrative of this

fact, in which a person, labouring under apoplexy, received into his

stomach more than forty grains of tartar emetic, without exciting either

nausea or vomiting. On opening the body, independent of the morbid state

of the brain, which must be regarded as the immediate cause of death,

extensive organic lesions were discovered in the alimentary canal, which

could alone be attributed to the action of the tartar emetic. This fact

will suggest a very important precaution to the practitioner, who may be

called upon to treat a person labouring under a state of the system

which will prevent the act of vomiting.[302].

The symptoms produced by this salt will resemble those of a corrosive

poison; and where vomiting is produced, it frequently happens that

although the patient may be eventually saved, an irritability of

stomach, so great as to cause the rejection of all aliments, will remain

for a considerable period; and _Dr. Male_ states that in the only case

of poisoning by this salt which he had ever seen, the person was

affected with violent convulsions, which returned at intervals for

several weeks after recovery from the immediate effects of the

poison.[303] _M. Orfila_, after detailing several cases of poisoning by

emetic tartar, concludes by saying that the general symptoms, upon such

occasions, may be reduced to the following: a rough metallic taste;

nausea; copious vomitings; frequent hiccup; cardialgia; burning heat in

the epigastric region; pains of the stomach; abdominal colics;

inflation; copious stools; syncope; small, contracted and accelerated

pulse; skin cold, sometimes intensely hot; breathing difficult; vertigo,

loss of sense, convulsive movements; very painful cramps in the legs;

prostration of strength,—death.

Sometimes to the above symptoms is joined a great difficulty of

swallowing; deglutition may be suspended for some time. The vomiting and

alvine evacuations do not always take place, the necessary consequence

of which is an increase in the violence of the other symptoms.

_Antidotes._

The great indication to be fulfilled in a case of this description, is

the ejection of the salt by vomiting. _MM. Orfila_ and _Berthollet_ rely

very confidently upon the effects of _bark_, _strong tea_, _infusion of

galls_, and other _vegetable astringents_, which have undoubtedly the

power of decomposing the salt. They ought, therefore, to be employed as

diluents to assist vomiting, but they are not to be considered as

antidotes which can render this latter operation less indispensable.

_Physiological action of emetic tartar._

_M. Majendie_ has shewn by experiment, that if _tartarized antimony_ be

injected into the veins of a dog, the animal vomits, and has frequent

stools; his breathing becomes difficult; his pulse frequent and

intermitting; a great degree of disquietude, and tremblings are the

precursory signs of death, which generally takes place within the first

hour from the injection of the emetic tartar. On opening the body great

alterations are perceived in the lungs; they are found of an orange or

violet colour, have no crackling, are distended with blood, and of a

tight texture. The mucous membrane of the intestinal canal, from the

cardia to the extremity of the rectum is red, and strongly injected.

If, instead of thus injecting the emetic tartar into the veins, it be

injected into the stomach, and the œsophagus is tied to prevent

vomiting, _M. Orfila_ informs us that the same alterations will be found

after death. The very same effects will also arise from the application

of the emetic tartar to the different absorbing surfaces, such as the

cellular substances, &c.

_Mr. Brodie_[304] has also thrown considerable light upon the action of

this salt. He observes that the effects of emetic tartar so much

resemble those of _arsenic_, which we have already described, and those

of _muriate of baryta_, which will form a future subject of inquiry,

that it would be needless to enter into a detail of the individual

experiments which he made with it. When applied to a wound in animals

which are capable of vomiting, it usually, but not constantly, operated

very speedily as an emetic; in other respects he found no material

difference in the symptoms produced in the different species of animals,

which he had been in the habit of employing as subjects of experiment.

The symptoms were paralysis, drowsiness, and, at last, complete

insensibility; the pulse became feeble, but the heart continued to act

after apparent death, and was maintained in action by means of

artificial respiration; but never for a longer period than for a few

minutes. Whence it would appear, that this poison acts by being

absorbed, and that it directs a sedative influence upon the heart, as

well as the brain, but that its principal action is on the latter. The

length of time which elapses, from the application of the poison to the

death of the animal, varies; in some instances _Mr. Brodie_ found that

it did not exceed three quarters of an hour, but in others, it was two

or three hours, or even longer, before death took place. When a solution

of emetic tartar was injected into the stomach of a rabbit, _Mr. Brodie_

observed the same symptoms to take place, as when it was applied to a

wound.

_Organic lesions discovered by dissection._

_Mr. Brodie_, in his examination of animals poisoned by _emetic tartar_,

sometimes found the stomach bearing the marks of inflammation, but at

other times, its appearance was perfectly natural. In no case did he

discover any traces of inflammation in the intestines. The reader must

compare this account with that already given by _M. Majendie_, at p.

282.

Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 2 (of 3) · 第 53 / 122 题