EMB. 13. BOOK III.

“Read on _this_ dial”—“Behold _these_ lilies”—does not this put you

in mind of the same form of expression in Ossian? “His spear was like

_that_ blasted fir.”

Quarles was commenting on his print in which the dial and lilies were

represented; Ossian saw his images “in his mind’s eye”——but both the

poets considered them as really existing—at least, they make them

exist to their readers.

“How the shades devour,” &c. Shakspeare has the same figure

——————the tide

_Eats_ not the flats with more impetuous haste

it is wonderfully expressive!

In what he calls his hieroglyphics, Quarles compares man to a taper,

which furnishes him with a number of very striking allusions. It is

at first unlighted, then a hand from heaven touches it with fire—the

motto, _Nescius unde_.

This flame-expecting taper hath at length

Received fire, and now begins to burn:

It hath no vigour yet, it hath no strength;

Apt to be puft and quencht at every turn:

It was a gracious hand that thus endow’d

This snuff with flame: but mark, this hand doth shroud

Itself from mortal eyes, and folds it in a cloud.

Thus man begins to live. An unknown flame

Quickens his finished organs, now possest

With motion; and which motion doth proclaim

An active soul, though in a feeble breast:

But how, and when infus’d, ask not my pen;

Here flies a cloud before the eyes of men,

I cannot tell thee how, nor canst thou tell me when.

Was it a parcel of celestial fire,

Infus’d by heav’n into this fleshly mould?

Or was it, think you, made a soul entire?

Then, was it new created, or of old?

Or is’t a propagated spark, rak’d out

From nature’s embers? while we go about

By reason to resolve, the more we raise a doubt.

If it be part of that celestial flame,

It must be ev’n as pure, as free from spot,

As that eternal fountain whence it came;

If pure and spotless, then whence came the blot?

Itself being pure, could not itself defile;

Nor hath unactive matter pow’r to soil

Her pure and active form, as jars corrupt their oil.

Or if it were created, tell me when?

If in the first six days, where kept ’till now?

Or if thy soul were new-created, then

Heav’n did not all at first, he had to do:

Six days expired, all creation ceast;

All kinds, ev’n from the greatest to the least,

Were finish’d and compleat before the day of rest.

But why should man, the Lord of creatures, want

That privilege which plants and beasts obtain?

Beasts bring forth beasts, and plant a perfect plant;

And ev’ry like brings forth her like again;

Shall fowls and fishes, beasts and plants convey

Life to their issue, and man less than they?

Shall these get living souls, and man dead lumps of clay?

Must human souls be generated then?——

My water ebbs; behold a rock is nigh:

If nature’s work produce the souls of men,

Man’s soul is mortal—all that’s born must die.

What shall we then conclude! what sunshine will

Disperse this gloomy cloud? till then, be still

My vainly striving thoughts; lie down my puzzled quill.

Thirty Letters on Various Subjects, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 26 / 30 题