CHAPTER XII

WORKING WAY DOWN

After some years' experience in missions and mission churches, I would

find it very hard if I were a workingman living in a tenement not to

be antagonistic to them; for, in large measure, such work is done on

the assumption that people are poor and degraded through laxity in

morals. The scheme of salvation is a salvation for the individual;

social salvation is out of the question. Social conditions cannot be

touched, because in all rotten social conditions, there is a thin red

line which always leads to the rich man or woman who is responsible

for them.

Coming in contact with these ugly social facts continuously, led me to

this belief. It came very slowly as did also the opinion that the

missionary himself or the pastor, be he as wise as Solomon, as

eloquent as Demosthenes, as virtuous as St. Francis, has no social

standing whatever among the people whose alms support the

institutions, religious and philanthropic, of which these men are the

executive heads. The fellowship of the saints is a pure fiction, has

absolutely no foundation in fact in a city like New York except as

the poor saints have it by themselves.

Tim Grogan jolted me into a new political economy; the crowded streets

of the East Side on a summer night gave me a new theology. I stood one

night in August on the tower of the old church and looked down upon

the sweltering mass that covered the roofs, fire escapes and

sidewalks. The roofs were littered with naked and half-naked children

panting for breath. Down on the crowded streets thousands of little

children darted in and out like sparrows, escaping as if by miracle

the vehicles of all sorts and descriptions. Crowded baby-carriages

lined the sidewalks. The stoops, too, were crowded. What a mass of

humans! What a ganglia of living wires! As I looked on this vast

multitude, I questioned the orthodox theology that held me in its

grip. Most of these people belonged to another race. And I stood at

that moment firmly rooted in the belief that this multitude was

inevitably doomed! Let me put it frankly, even though it seems brutal:

doomed to hell!

I am unable to analyze the quick currents of thought that went through

my mind at that instant. I cannot explain how the change came. I know

that there came to me a bigger thought than any I had ever known, and

that thought so thrilled me with human feeling, with love for men,

that I said to my soul: "Soul, if this multitude is doomed to hell, be

brave; gird up your loins and go with them!"

In that tenement district people were being murdered by the tens of

thousands by tuberculosis, by defective plumbing, by new diseases born

of the herding of men and women like cattle. I made some feeble

attempt to investigate, to ascertain, to acquaint myself with the

facts, and my investigation led me to this result--a result that the

lapse of years has not altered; that the private ownership of

tenements--the private profits in housing--was not only the mother of

the great white plague, but of most of the plagues down there that

endanger health. It led me to the belief also that the struggle for

bodily health, the struggle to survive, was so fierce as to leave

little time for soul health or mental health! It was a source of

continual wonder to me that people so helpless and so neglected were

as good as they were, or as healthy as they were. It did not seem

reasonable to lay the blame at the doors of the owners of the

tenements. Many of them had a tenement only as a source of income--and

to acquire the tenement had taken long years of savings, earnings and

sacrifices. It was part of the great game of business, the game of

"live I, die you!"

The churches and synagogues are of little vital importance there,

because they ignore social conditions, or largely ignore them. And

there is a reason for this also, and the reason is that they are

supported by the people--the very people who perpetuate the evils

against which prophet, priest and pastor ought to cry out

continually. The protest against such conditions is a negligible

quantity.

There is a protest, an outcry, but it is related neither to the church

nor to the synagogue. The East Side has a soul, but it is not an

ecclesiastical soul! It is a soul that is alive--so much alive to the

interest of the people that many times I felt ashamed of myself when I

listened to the socialistic orators on the street corners and in the

East Side halls. They were stirring up the minds of the people. They

were not merely making them discontented with conditions, but they

were offering a programme of reconstruction--a programme that included

a trowel as well as a sword.

The soul of the East Side expressed itself in the Yiddish press,

daily, weekly, and monthly, and in Yiddish literature, and in the

spoken word of the propagandist whose ideal, though limited in

literary expression, made him a flame of living fire. It was this soul

of the East Side that drove me against my will to study the relation

of politics to the condition of the people. One of the first things

that I discovered was the grip that Tammany had on the people. Every

saloon keeper was a power in the community. Men, of any force of

character whatever, who were willing to hold their hands behind their

backs for Tammany graft, were singled out by the organization for some

moiety of honour. Small merchants found it to their advantage to keep

on the right side of the saloon keepers and the Tammany leaders. I

remember trying to express this thought in an uptown church to a

wealthy congregation; and I remember distinctly, also, that I was

rebuked by one of the leading lights of the missionary society of

which I was a part. I was informed that my business was to "save

souls," and in my public addresses to tell how I saved them; that

political conditions must be left to the politicians--and it was done.

To the old church at the corner of Market and Henry streets came

Dowling. He followed me as a matter of fellowship--we loved each

other. And came also Dave Ranney, the "puddler from Pittsburg."

On the first anniversary of Dave's conversion, I gathered a hundred

wastrels of the Bowery together and gave them a dinner at the church.

Dave, of course, was the guest of honour. When my guests were full and

warm, they became reminiscent, and I urged them, a few of them, to

tell us their stories--to unfold the torn manuscripts of their lives.

Dave told his first.

"Boys," he said, "I was one of de toughest gazabos what ever hung

aroun' de square. I met dis man an' tried t' bleed 'im, but it warn't

no go--'e was on to de game and cudn't be touch't.

"I giv'd 'im a song an' dance story fur weeks. One day 'e sez to me,

sez 'e, 'Chum!'--well, say boys, when I went out an' had a luk at

meself, sez I, 'Ye dhirty loafer, if a man like dat calls y' "chum,"

why don't y' take a brace an' get on de dead level?' So I did an' I've

been on de dead level ever since--ain't I, boss?"

I was able to place Dave as janitor of the church. After he had been

there for a while and comfortably housed in the janitor's quarters in

the basement, he thought it a propitious time to be reconciled to his

wife; so we arranged to have Mary come down and inspect the place. We

put extra work into the cleaning of the quarters, furnishing it with

some sticks of furniture. Reconciliations were getting to be an old

story with Mary, and Dave knew he was going to have difficulty in this

new attempt. He finally persuaded her to make a visit to the church.

When he was ready, Dave, in a most apologetic tone, said:

"There is just one thing lacking here."

"What is it Dave?"

"A white tie."

"Where?"

"On you."

The white tie as ecclesiastical appendage I had avoided. I despised

it. But Dave assured me that if Mary came down to look the church

over, she would be more interested in my appearance than in the

appearance of the church, because what she really wanted was an

assurance that Dave was "on the square!" and if he could introduce

her to a real minister as his friend, it would enhance his chance.

I sent Dave to the Bowery for a five cent white string tie, and I

borrowed a Prince Albert coat. There was an old stovepipe hat in the

church--sort of legacy from former pastorates--and it was trotted out,

carefully brushed and put on the study table. Then Mary appeared! Dave

had instructed me to put up a "tall talk," so I put up the tallest

possible. Mary inspected the church, the quarters and the minister;

then she looked at Dave and said in an undertone--"This looks on the

level."

"You bet your sweet life!" Dave said.

So Mary was installed as "the lady of the temple" at Sixty-one Henry

Street, and for seven years ministered to the poor and the needy, and

kept in order the House of God. After her death, Dave remained at the

church about a year; then he became my successor as missionary to the

lodging houses on the Bowery, where he still works--a sort of humble

doctor of the humanities; feeding the hungry, clothing the naked,

comforting men in despair.

It seemed to me at that time that what a weak church like that most

needed was a strong, powerful church to put its arms around it and

give it support. I interviewed Dr. Parkhurst, as I was Chairman of a

Committee of the City Vigilance League which he organized. The result

was that Dr. Parkhurst's church gave it for a year support and

absolute independence of action at the same time. Then the Rev. John

Hopkins Dennison, who had been Dr. Parkhurst's assistant, superseded

me in the care of the church, and was able to bring to its support

help that I could not have touched. Mr. Dennison's service to that

church is worthy of a better record than it has yet received. He

performed brilliant service, intensified the life of the church and

gathered around it a band of noble people. He transformed the tower of

the church into a kind of modern monastery in which he lived himself,

and in which Dowling, the old Irish tinker, had a place also, and

which he made a centre of ten years' missionary work chiefly among the

lodging houses where I found him.

One day Dowling was walking along the Bowery when a hand was laid

roughly on his shoulder and a voice said:

"Ain't you Dowling?"

"Yes."

"What did you do with the loot?"

In the Sepoy Rebellion in India, he had looted the palace of a Rajah

with two other soldiers. The most valuable items of the booty were

several bamboo canes stuffed with diamonds, rubies and sapphires. In

the act of burying them for protection and hiding, one of the soldiers

was shot dead; the other two escaped and separated, and all these

years each of them had lived in the suspicion that the other had gone

back for the loot, and they both discovered on the Bowery that

neither of them had and that this valuable stuff was buried in far-off

India. Dowling wrote to the Governor-General and told of his part in

the affair and volunteered to come out and locate it. But by this time

his body was wasted, his steps were tottering and his head bent.

Five-hundred dollars were appropriated by the Indian Government to

take him out; but Dowling was destined for another journey; and, in

the old tower that he loved so well and where he was beloved by every

one who knew him, he lay down and died. They buried him in Plainfield,

N.J., and his friends put over him a stone bearing these words that

were so characteristic of his life:

"HE WENT ABOUT DOING GOOD"

My next service was in a city of a second class beyond the Mississippi

River. I had been invited as a pulpit supply in one of its largest

churches, but when I arrived I found them in a wrangle over the pastor

who had just left and by whose recommendation I was to fill the

pulpit. I arrived in the city on a Sunday morning and went from my

hotel to the church prepared to preach. I stood for a few minutes in

the vestibule, and what I heard led me to go straight out again, never

to return.

My first impression of the city was that it contained more vital

democracy than any city I had ever been in. It takes an Old World

proletarian a long time to outgrow a sense of subserviency. As a

missionary and almoner of the rich in New York, this sense was very

strong in me. In the West I felt this vital democracy so keenly and

saw the vision of political independence so clearly, that my very

blood seemed to change. Politically, I was born again.

From the Bottom Up: The Life Story of Alexander Irvine · 第 12 / 22 章