CHAPTER XVII

_Of the lamentable ending of the disputes between the governor and

the archbishop; and how the latter was exiled to Mariveles._

Within a short time, the old wounds were reopened, and the archbishop

was given new causes for anger in which it was impossible for him to

employ dissimulation, as they were all concerning the administration

of his office. The governor deprived the Order of St. Francis of

the administration and chaplaincy of the royal hospital of Manila,

which they had administered with great care, charity, and zeal; and

appointed a lay administrator and a secular chaplain. The archbishop

felt that greatly, and declined to give the new chaplain permission to

administer the sacraments, on account of legitimate reasons which he

had for this step. The latter had recourse to the Audiencia by plea

of fuerza; and the auditor, Don Marcos Zapata, immediately declared

that it had been committed. The archbishop protested, knowing by what

had happened in the past the prejudice that the said auditor felt,

and because one auditor with only the fiscal could not constitute so

sovereign a tribunal. For the fiscal had not the royal appointment,

but had only been appointed by the governor _ad interim_; for the

plurality of votes which attest a correct decision and authorize the

best opinion, according to the Divine sentence _Salus autem ubi multa

consilia_ (Proverbs, ch. 5), were lacking. This has been experienced on

various occasions, on which only one auditor has been left in Manila,

an arbiter following rather the dictates of his will than that of

his understanding, which has the truth as its object.

At that same time, Don Francisco de Valdés having resigned the post

of archdean, to which he had been presented by Don Juan Cerezo de

Salamanca, the governor appointed Don Andrés Arias Xirón to it on

the eighteenth of April, and presented him to the archbishop, so that

the latter might give him the collation. The prudent prelate grieved

sorely over an occasion that could only with great difficulty terminate

satisfactorily, as the said Don Andrés was then prohibited from being

promoted to any dignity, because of the visitation in which he had

been proclaimed as a criminal by many heavy charges, which demanded a

rigorous sentence and deprivation of the benefice that he held; and

it was impossible to give him the collation for so lofty a dignity

according to the holy canons and council. The archbishop refused to

commit a like act of injustice, whereupon Don Andrés Arias Xirón,

aggrieved, interposed the appeal from fuerza, which the auditor

Zapata did not fail to declare against the archbishop. He did this,

and despatched a royal decree for it, which the archbishop refused to

obey. The governor was very angry at not succeeding with his attempt,

and because the archbishop had not given the canonical collation to

Don Andrés Arias Xirón. That strife increasing in violence by means of

the interlocutors, Don Andrés and the auditor, the declared enemies

of the archbishop, assemblies and meetings were held in order to

exile the archbishop from the kingdom, because he did not obey the

royal decrees. In conclusion, they issued a decree for his exile,

and notified the archbishop of it May 9, 1636.

The archbishop called a meeting of the orders, in order to consult

them and get their advice in so urgent a case. All were of the opinion

that the archbishop ought not to yield, since what they were trying

to compel him to do was manifestly unjust. They exhorted him to be

constant in defending the ecclesiastical immunity, and the observance

of the holy canons; for that, in case he were exiled, he was suffering

for defending his church as a good shepherd, and it was enough to

acquire the aureola of a martyr. Upon this the archbishop took the

resolution to suffer for his church, with a valor and constancy worthy

of wonder. The party of the governor having learned this, and that

the archbishop would not yield his right, the governor determined to

execute what had been decided by what he called the royal Audiencia.

The evening of that same day, Friday, May 9, the governor summoned

the auditor Zapata and the fiscal to a meeting. After the meeting

they sent the chief constable of that court with orders to execute

the banishment of the archbishop. He was given such aid of soldiers

as the governor deemed sufficient. The latter also sent other squads

to the cathedral church, so that they might take their station in the

sacristy of the most holy sacrament, so that it might not be taken

out or destroyed. That order went forth and immediately the city

learned of the impious imprisonment that was about to be executed

on their shepherd. It caused great excitement and grief to all,

and a great scandal among the natives of these islands, even among

the pagans and Mahometans who frequent the islands for commerce;

and not many wished to concur in so unjust a determination. The

orders hastened to the archiepiscopal houses, where they found the

archbishop with the warnings that they were about to arrest him,

clad in his pontifical robes. He, also knowing that the most holy

sacrament was being guarded in the cathedral, sent father Fray Juan

de Piña, guardian of St. Francis, to his convent for the most holy

sacrament. On that occasion it was placed in a lunette; and it was

brought with all the propriety possible, accompanied by many religious

carrying candles. When it had been brought, the father guardian placed

it in the hands of the archbishop. He, bathed in tears, received it;

and, with noteworthy courage, seated himself to await the agents of

the execution. He sent his notaries to notify the governor and the

auditor, Don Marcos Zapata, of censures; but the notaries, finding them

assembled with the fiscal in the hall of meeting, had more respect

for the human Majesty, whom they represented there in assembly, than

the chief constable and his helpers had for the supreme majesty of

majesties, Christ our Lord, whose sacrament was in the hands of the

archbishop. Therefore the ecclesiastical notaries notified them at

the doors. While doing this at one of the doors, it is said that the

governor ordered a soldier to extinguish the lights by which they

were reading, by waving his hat, which was done.

At that same time the chief constable and his helpers were in the

archiepiscopal house, where the archbishop was found in the manner

above described, surrounded and accompanied by all the orders except

that of the Society of Jesus. The chief constable sent to advise

the governor of the condition in which he had found the archbishop,

whereupon the governor sent him orders that he should cause the

religious to retire to their convents; and that, when the archbishop

grew tired of holding the most holy sacrament, he was to arrest him

with the soldiers whom he had with him. That was intimated to the

religious and lay priests who were about the archbishop; but they

refused to obey it, fearing lest they incur the wrath of God if they

abandoned the prince of the Church on such an occasion. Thus by common

consent they remained to aid their afflicted prelate; relieving him

at times by easing him of the weight of the lunette, by placing their

hands on those of the tired old man, whose eyes were turned into two

fountains of tears when he reflected on the acts of desecration that

they were practicing on the Supreme Lord. The governor was so far

from mitigating his anger in what he had commenced, that, in place

of repenting and returning to himself, he took horse, although it

was the middle of the night, and went to the archiepiscopal house;

and, seated at the door, sent his orders to the executors of the

commission. The first order was for them to eject forcibly all the

priests who were with the archbishop, the adjutants striking the

soldiers with the flat of their swords and giving them heavy blows

because they did not execute their orders. Thereupon the religious,

seeing that the poor soldiers were forced to do what they did

not wish, allowed themselves to be seized and carried outside. The

soldiers humbly begged their pardon, protesting that they were under

orders. The governor's purpose was to wait until the archbishop,

destitute of all human consolation, should surrender on account

of his advanced age and his lack of nourishment, his watching and

continual annoyance, and should relinquish the most holy sacrament,

so that they could then seize him and make him enter the boat. That

report circulated among the orders, and accordingly they all came

in a body with lighted candles to attend to the recovery of the most

holy sacrament. But the governor had already seized the entrances of

the streets by means of soldiers, in order that they might not pass,

and they accordingly returned to their convents. The city and the

magistracy sent their commissaries to the archbishop, begging him to

avoid compromising himself, which was equivalent to telling him to

allow himself to be arrested and exiled. For, as these islands are

one body which has only one head, it is the latter which attracts

all wills to his own; for fear (which is very powerful here), or

self-interest, has more place here than anywhere else in the world.

The afflicted shepherd seeing that "this was his hour of darkness,"

and that the frightened sheep had abandoned him, ordered the interdict

to be raised--the grieving bells publishing the feeling that many

did not give vent to and others could not show, in order not to

incur the anger of the passionate governor. The governor ordered

the soldiers to disperse the religious by force, even if they had

to take them into custody. The soldiers carried out the order with

the violence necessary for so unjust a sentence, being instigated by

the sword-blows and strokes of the adjutants. That having been seen

by the priests, they pitied them so keenly that they preferred to

have that punishment executed on them than on the poor soldiers. Some

religious were seated beside the archbishop to see whether they would

be allowed to aid him; but so many were the pushes and prods given

them by the soldiers, that not only did they tear them away, but

they fell down with the holy monstrance breaking the lunette in which

was the holy host. This ought to be written with tears of blood. The

father guardian of St. Francis and a secular priest hastened to put

a strap about the archbishop's neck and to fasten the lunette to him,

so that he could support it, for his powers were now failing him. At

that juncture, order was given to a soldier named Juan de Santa Ana

(whom I knew, and who told me that event many times), to draw away

the hand of the archbishop. He, assisted by a living faith, answered

boldly that he would kill himself before he would commit such an

act of sacrilege. Then drawing his sword, and placing the point in

his breast, he fell upon it. By the permission of divine Providence,

the sword doubled up in such a manner when the soldier fell upon it,

that he was not wounded at all. That incident caused great surprise

to all the bystanders; but the governor was so little moved by it that

he ordered the soldier to be arrested, when he ought to have rewarded

his heroic determination. At one o'clock at night, the archbishop was

so greatly weakened and tired out from thirst, that he begged to be

given a little water. They sent to consult with the governor as to

what they were to do. The governor ordered that they should not allow

it to be given him, explaining that the denial of the temporalities

was understood not to allow water to be given him for his thirst, and

that to do otherwise would be not to execute the royal law--as if so

sovereign dispositions extended to such impieties. Advice was given

to the convents, threatening the suspension of religious functions,

in order that they should not forestall by celebrating the offices of

the following day. The archiepiscopal hall was cleared of the religious

who were assisting the archbishop, the soldiers having already driven

them away by blows. The soldiers stationed themselves with firearms

in hand, and thus did they remain all the night without giving any

nourishment to the archbishop, except what a pious Franciscan religious

could give him by applying to his lips a wet cloth, under pretext of

tightening the strap with which the most holy sacrament was fastened

to the afflicted prelate's breast. And he did not receive any other

nourishment for a day and a half, until they took him to the island

of Mariveles. Saturday, the second [_sic; sc._ tenth] of May dawned,

the most fatal day that these islands have seen. On that day the

archbishop was so defeated that, seeing that he could make no further

resistance for lack of strength, he ordered the most holy sacrament to

be returned to the church with all possible reverence, and, bathed in

tears, he laid aside the pontifical robe. Immediately he was seized by

an adjutant and fifty soldiers with firearms. They led him from the

archiepiscopal palace on foot, at five in the morning, and without

other following than the troops who executed the tragedy. They did

not need so great preparation for an old man of sixty, worn out by

so much fatigue, hunger, and thirst. They took him on foot through

those streets boasting of their victory, the fearful inhabitants

thrusting their heads out of the most hidden windows, frightened by the

despotic governor, to whom any commiseration that should be shown to

the poor archbishop was regarded as a detestable crime. The soldiers

took the archbishop to the gate on the river, called Santo Domingo,

where the prelate, complying with the precept of Christ, shook off

the dust from his shoes; and, bathed in tender tears, he threw five

little stones at the ingrate walls of Manila. It was noted that one

of them touched the leg of Don Pedro de Corcuera (sargento-mayor of

the camp, and chief of that impious execution), where later in the

war with Joló he received a ball, from which he died.

They put the archbishop aboard a champan of a ship-captain called

Marcos Cameros, who would not allow one single mouthful of food to

be placed on board. Setting sail, they carried the archbishop to the

island of Mariveles, which is situated in the middle of the mouth

of the bay. There they disembarked the exiled shepherd, for whose

lodging they had provided a wretched little room, where he suffered

many discomforts, too long to relate; for it has not been my intention

to enlarge upon this lamentable tragedy, in the narration of which

I have omitted many circumstances which aggravate the execution [of

his banishment]. For it is my intention not to exaggerate, but only

to relate succinctly what happened; and, although eye-witnesses of

everything are not lacking today, to guide myself by the most truthful

relations, and chiefly by those which are found in a book containing

sketches of the archbishops, which is kept in the cathedral church

of Manila. [43]

The purpose of the governor and his followers having been obtained,

as we have seen, they persuaded the ecclesiastical cabildo to take

charge of the government, interpreting the archbishop's exile as

a vacant see, thus opening the door to other disturbances, no less

serious, which originated from this intrusion--in the very sight of

the archbishop who was [still] within his diocese, and who had left a

provisor in Manila, Doctor Don Francisco Fernandez de Ledo. For his

forcible banishment and the deprivation of his secular revenues did

not extend to his spiritual jurisdiction, which originated from the

Roman pontiff. In case that the church had suffered a vacancy by the

death of the archbishop, then the bishop of Cebú, Don Pedro de Arce,

was to enter its government; for it belonged to him by virtue of the

bull and royal decree mentioned in another place. The archbishop

had already appointed the father master, Fray Francisco de Paula,

of the Order of Preachers, to govern the archbishopric in the first

place, and two others in the second, and hence they could not allege

the condition of affairs that the law points out in the chapter _Si

Episcopus: de supplenda negligencia Prælatorum_, in Case sixth. That

happened afterward in Manila, in the exile of Archbishop Don Fray

Felipe Pardo, [44] of the Order of Preachers, who had appointed to

his place of governor during his absence Don Fray Ginés de Barrientos,

bishop of Troya; the cabildo refused to admit him, but [declared] that

it was a case of a vacant see, and took charge of the government--which

cost the dean, Master Don Miguel Ortiz de Covarrubias, and all the

prebendaries, very dear.

The cabildo took charge of the government at the governor's command,

and appointed Don Fray Francisco Zamudio, bishop-elect of Camarines

(who had come to Manila to negotiate concerning his bishopric),

as provisor-general. He received the appointment under protest

of _ad interim_ until the bishop of Cebú should be advised, for

the vacancy pertained to him in case that one were proclaimed. He

absolved the governor, the auditor Zapata, and the others included in

the excommunications of the archbishop, on the twentieth of May. It

is said that when the cabildo were obliged to take charge of the

government by the governor and auditor, they entered their protests;

but the archbishop was greatly grieved over it when he heard of it,

which with the many other sorrows [that he endured] made it remarkable

that his life did not come to an end, since he was so aged and had

borne so many hardships.

The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 25 of 55 1635-36 Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, As Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century · 第 3 / 5 章