CHAPTER IX.

AUSTRALIAN FOOD HABITS AND THEIR FAULTS.--A PLEA FOR THEIR IMPROVEMENT.

It is somewhat curious that, among the many questions which pertain to

the national life of Australia, little, if any, attention has been

directed to the influences which the daily food and habitual dietary

exercise upon the present, and in what way they will affect the future

population. And yet it must be apparent that the life of a nation is

moulded in no small degree by its daily fare, by its general food

habits, and still more by the fact of its living in conformity with, or

in direct opposition to, its climatic requirements. It is evident that

the natural dietary of the earth's inhabitants is controlled largely by

the particular region in which they dwell. Thus the Hindoos, and

contiguous Eastern nations, subsist mainly upon the cereals, in which

rice plays so prominent a part. The Greenlander's fare, on the

contrary, consists almost entirely of oils and fats; indeed, on this

point Sir Anthony Carlisle relates the following anecdote:--"The most

Northern races of mankind," says he, "were found to be unacquainted

with the taste of sweets, and their infants made wry faces and

sputtered out sugar with disgust, but the little urchins grinned with

ecstasy at the sight of a bit of whale's blubber." In the same way the

Arab is a date-eater and the Kaffir is a milk consumer. These facts

being borne in mind, it will be desirable to ascertain whether the

usual food habits obtaining in Australia are those which the nature of

the climate renders advisable. If, as a result of such an inquiry, it

be demonstrated that the dietary customs followed here are not

in harmony with the climatic conditions, it would, perhaps, be well to

suggest in what direction amendment should take place.

A reference to the isothermal lines in any physical atlas will be of

considerable value in assisting us to the elucidation of the subject

under consideration. These are certain lines drawn over a chart of the

earth's surface, on which are located those cities and regions where

the mean annual temperature is the same. Thus the mean annual

temperature of Sydney is 62.9 degrees; the corresponding line in the

northern world runs through Naples and Lisbon in Europe, and a little

below the central portion of the United States and California in America.

At Melbourne the average yearly temperature is 57.6 degrees, corresponding

in the old world to a temperature met with at Marseilles, Bordeaux, the

south of France and Northern Italy, while across the Atlantic a somewhat

similar climate obtains about the middle of the United States. The mean

annual temperature at Brisbane is 67.74 degrees; this is the same as that

of Algiers and the southern shores of the Mediterranean generally, and

coincides with that met with in New Orleans and the southern states of

North America. At Adelaide the average yearly temperature is 63.1 degrees,

and the climate is considered to greatly resemble that of Sicily. Now, no

other mode that I am aware of, such as this juxtaposition of localities

where the mean annual temperature is the same, will afford such a

convenient way of contrasting the mode of living which is practised in

Australia with that which is followed by the inhabitants of the regions

referred to in Europe. The cardinal difference, and one which stands

out in bold relief, is that the Australian food habits are

characterised by a preponderancy of meat diet and a corresponding

neglect of vegetable products. On the other hand, the dietary of

Southern Europe is in rational harmony with its climate, and

there is not that insensate insistence of a highly nitrogenous animal

fare to the exclusion of all else. The striking features, then, in

connection with the Australian dietary are this extraordinary

consumption of meat and the faith which is presumably attached to its

food value. It is no exaggeration to say that the vast majority of our

people believe implicitly in the necessity for meat at their three

daily mealy, and not only is this the case in the cooler parts of the

year, but it is practised universally during the height of the summer,

without being modified in the slightest degree. Thus the student of

ethnography is presented with the somewhat curious anomaly of a people

living in a summer temperature of 70 degrees or 80 degrees in the shade,

eating more meat than do the bulk of the inhabitants of Great Britain and

Ireland (with their ice and snow) during their winter months. It is one of

the characteristics of the Anglo-Saxon race, however, this inability to

appreciate the necessity of conforming to new climatic conditions in

which their lot may be cast. It will be the same, too, when the British

restaurant-keeper begins business in Equatorial Africa. For an absolute

certainty his bill-of-fare for the delectation of the unfortunate

colonist will consist of roast beef, Yorkshire pudding, plum pudding,

and the old familiar throng. Whether mine host has to consult the taste

of his client, or whether the latter has simply to accept what is

proffered, is not absolutely decided; probably they are both imbued

with a belief in the necessity of solid fare, regarding it as a solemn

truth beyond all possibility of cavil.

This abuse of flesh food in a climate like Australia would be serious

enough under any circumstances, but it is intensified and aggravated by

the direct unoriginality in dealing with meat. Is it not a fact that

there is no attempt whatever made to break through the conventional

chain of joints, roasted or boiled, and the inevitable grill or fry?

In how many houses does the breakfast ever consist of anything

but the ubiquitous chops, steaks, or sausages? indeed, one might almost

term them "the faith, hope, and charity" of domestic life. I remember

reading some little time ago that if a map of the world were made in

which lands of utter darkness were coloured black like the coalfields

in an atlas of physical geography, certain races would be signalised by

their opaqueness. If such a map were ever compiled, Australia would of

necessity be characterised by blackness; such a blackness, indeed, that

jet itself would be as snowy white beside it. But why should this

lamentable state of things be said of Australians, who claim to be

progressive in their ideas and advanced in their views, usages, and

customs?

In conjunction with this dietetic view of the matter, one of the

objects I have in writing is to direct attention to the great neglect

there is of vegetables, especially those of the more unknown varieties,

as an agreeable, desirable, palatable, and salutary element in the

Australian food life. One need not be a vegetarian to properly

appreciate the valuable properties of vegetables, and most people will

fare better and feel the benefit of a modification of their customary

dietary if they decrease the amount of meat they indulge in and

proportionately increase their vegetable allowance. Now, there are many

vegetables besides those ordinarily in use which might be easily

cultivated, and serve to form a pleasing variety at table. Once the

demand arises for kinds other than those usually grown, the inducement

for market-gardeners to supply them would be no longer wanting. A

reference to the catalogues furnished by the seedsmen and plant-merchants

of the different Australian metropolitan cities will show

that special attention is called to many of these vegetables, and yet I

am informed that, although they are continually inserted in the new

issues as they appear from time to time, no notice seems to be

taken of them whatever. I propose, therefore, briefly to describe some

of these comparatively unknown vegetables, and to point out their

merits and their claims for recognition.

The globe artichoke might be more frequently grown, as it is really a

good vegetable and easily cooked. It constitutes the flower head of the

CYNARA SCOLYMUS (one of the thistle family), and is gathered before the

flowers expand. The ends of the flower scales attached to the disc, and

the central disc itself, are the parts that are eaten, and they

constitute a delicately flavoured vegetable. It is extensively

cultivated in California, and is there to be met with in nearly all

hotels and restaurants. Another thing in its favour is that it is

peculiarly one of the vegetables which diabetics may indulge in without

fear. It does well in the cooler parts of Australia, and should

certainly be more generally grown.

The Jerusalem artichoke is not to be confused with the preceding, as it

belongs to a different vegetable genus altogether. It is a species of

sunflower, as its name denotes, the prefix Jerusalem being in reality a

corruption of the Italian word GIRASOLE, a sunflower. It resembles the

potato in that it is a tuberous-rooted vegetable, and grows readily

enough--in fact, perhaps it grows too readily, for once it takes

possession of the soil it is difficult to eradicate it. The Jerusalem

artichoke, however, is comparatively common here, and when cooked

properly it is a most delightful vegetable, although it may not be

sufficiently appreciated at first. It often happens that these

artichokes are of a bad colour, and too crisp when brought to table.

This is easily prevented, however, by washing and paring them like

potatoes and then placing them in a bowl of clear water, to which a few

drops of fresh lemon juice have been added. When boiled with sufficient

water to just cover them, and a liberal allowance of salt, for

20 min. to 40 min., they come out a snowy white and quite tender. They

are especially delicious when served up with melted butter and egg

sauce.

Asparagus.--Although this delicate and luscious vegetable is of the

easiest culture, and grows readily along the coast, yet to our shame be

it said that it is usually too much of a luxury for ordinary mortal, to

afford. Now, it is for the most part such a general favourite that one

may well ask why it is not more cultivated. The demand for it in

America is so great, and it yields such a good return, that some

growers, make 100 percent; and upwards yearly profit for each acre. Is

it not a severe reflection upon our market gardeners, to find that the

imported preserved varieties of asparagus are so esculent that the very

stalks, are as, luscious as the heads of the vegetable? In its fresh

state it should be eaten as soon after cutting as possible, and, like

the globe artichoke, is readily allowable to diabetics. It is somewhat

curious, too, that the asparagus, and the globe artichoke are the only

vegetables which the British race eat as, a single dish.

Brussels sprouts are the most delicate of all the borecoles, and it is

a thousand pities that this delightful vegetable is not more often to

be met with. These miniature, cabbages, however, require some little

care in their rearing, and hence amateurs often fail to reach

perfection in their cultivation. They may be boiled like cabbage, in

abundance of water and a little salt for 15 minutes, then drained,

dried, and finally tossed in butter with a little pepper and nutmeg.

They do well enough, as does the borecole or kale itself, in all the

cooler parts of Australia.

The cardoon, like the globe artichoke, belongs to the thistle family,

yet it is, more hardy and robust than the latter. It is readily grown,

particularly in the cooler districts, and, like many other of the more

unknown vegetables, is too much neglected. Its leaf-stalks

should be at least an inch and a half thick before they are ready for

cutting. They are then blanched, and when cooked recall somewhat the

flavour of the globe artichoke. These tender leaf-stalks are used in

soups and salads, and it may be boiled also in a similar manner to

sea-kale, in which latter form it is especially palatable.

The celeriac or turnip-rooted celery is a very choice vegetable, and is

much cultivated on the Continent. Its nutty root is not at all unlike

the solid root portion of common celery in taste, which by many is

considered superior in flavour to the other parts of the latter plant.

The celeriac is greatly esteemed, and is known as the CELERI-RAVE BY

the French, and as the knoll-selerie by the Germans. The latter,

indeed, are so fond of it that they call barely talk of it without

moist eyes and watery mouths. It is hardier than celery, and possesses

an advantage in that it can be taken up and stored similarly to carrots

and beets. The celerific may be boiled as a table vegetable or used for

flavouring soups, or it may be sliced for salads. It does well in all

the cooler parts, and might be cultivated with benefit, mingled with

gratitude.

The egg plant, or aubergine, does so exceedingly well, and can be so

highly recommended, that one may well wonder why it is never seen. It

is a native of Africa and tropical America, and is very popular both in

the East and West Indies. It is cultivated also a great deal in the

United States, where it is greatly appreciated for culinary use. In

AUBERGINES FARCIES, a favourite dish, they are cut in hakes, the

centres chopped and put back into the skins with oil, &c. They are then

sprinkled with breadcrumbs, and browned. It is easily grown, and it

seems unaccountable why it should be passed over.

The kohl rabi, or turnip-rooted cabbage, is another nutritious

vegetable which has inexplicably never been received into

public favour. Its delicate flavour should ensure for it a

well-established position with those who are fond of good vegetables, as

it is more tender and more savoury than either turnip or cabbage, and is

not at all unlike cauliflower in taste. For table purposes it should be

only about two-thirds grown, for if allowed to go to full size the

outside skin becomes tough and hard. It is another of those vegetables

which are so highly prized on the Continent, and it is already an

acknowledged favourite in America. It does well in all the cooler

localities, and gives a larger yield than turnips.

The salsify, or "vegetable oyster," is a typical example of a most

unaccountably slighted vegetable with us, and yet it is highly

appreciated on the continent and in the United States. The root is long

and tapering, becoming fleshy and tender by cultivation, and with a

whitish, milky-like juice. It has a rich flavour, not at all unlike

that of cooked oysters, whence it derives its value. In preparing

salsify for table the darkish outside skin requires to be lightly

scraped off, and then it should be steeped for a while in cold water so

as to remove any slight bitterness it may possess. Like parsnips, when

cooked it requires to be boiled slowly, in the smallest possible

quantity of water, until it is almost ready to melt. If boiled fast, in

abundance of water, the savour of both parsnips and salsify is to a

great extent dispersed and lost beyond recall. One of the most approved

methods of cooking salsify roots is to slowly boil them to tenderness

in the smallest possible quantity of milk, and then to mash and fry

them in butter, with salt and pepper. Cold boiled salsify, with the

addition of some chopped herbs, tarragon vinegar, and salad oil, makes

an exceedingly good salad. The salsify does well in all the cooler

regions, and, moreover, it is easily grown.

Scorzonera.--This Spanish plant is very similar to salsify,

and requires the same kind of treatment; but, being a stronger grower,

requires more room in its culture. It may be served in soups or treated

like salsify. The outside leaves should be removed before the vegetable

is cooked. The blanched leaves also are highly esteemed on the

Continent, and are used for salad purposes. It grows well in all the

cooler parts of Australia, and might certainly be introduced for the

public benefit.

Sea kale is one of those vegetables which are brought to perfection in

England, so much so that Careme, that mighty CHEF, when he came across

them in London went into ecstasies. He described them as resembling

branches of celery, which should be served like asparagus, with butter

sauce, after 20 minutes' boiling. In some respects this is verily the

most delicious of all vegetables, and as it grows well here it should

be largely cultivated, yet it is almost unknown. It is fit to rank

with, if not precede, asparagus, and as a matter of fact it is far more

profitable than the latter, so that market gardeners would have

something to gain by its introduction. Like the cabbage, it was

originally a maritime plant, and has been brought to its present state

of perfection by cultivation. It requires to be thoroughly blanched by

exclusion from light, similarly to celery, for when coloured at all it

possesses an acrid taste. Of the many ways of sending it to table, one

of the best is to boil it and serve it on toast with a little melted

butter. It should be largely cultivated, as it does well all along the

coastal parts, being, as already mentioned, a maritime plant.

Sweet corn is deservedly a great favourite with those who know of its

succulent flavour and nourishing properties. Unfortunately, however, it

is with us only in the imported tins from America, and therefore we can

only conjecture how delicious it must be when fresh. It is so

commonly met with in the fresh form in America that it is found at

nearly every dinner table. Large areas where land is not expensive are

devoted to its growth, and hundreds of acres are required annually for

the New York markets alone. It does splendidly in all parts of

Australia, and for growing children it constitutes one of the most

nutritious vegetables that can be well imagined. On this latter account

alone, therefore, it is really a matter for national regret that it is

so improperly passed over. One thing requires to be borne in mind, and

it is that the cobs of ordinary Indian corn which are seen in so many

country districts must not be confused with this sweet corn, as the

latter is entirely different.

These nutritious, although somewhat unknown vegetables, therefore,

evidently deserve to be brought into prominent notice, and once public

interest is aroused, their cultivation and ready sale will speedily

follow. At the same time it must not be forgotten that the tomato

itself had a desperate struggle for reception into public favour when

first introduced to us. It actually trembled in the balance for no

inconsiderable time, and it was some years before its good qualities

were universally recognised. To-day, however, it occupies a very

different position, and takes rank as a luscious vegetable, appreciated

by thousands of people; and besides, it is of undoubted value in many

disorders of the liver. But now that the Agricultural Colleges are in

full swing in the different colonies, notably in New South Wales,

Victoria, and South Australia, it is certain that the greatest possible

good to the whole community will result. Their effect, too, in

indirectly populating the agricultural areas of Australia will

materially aid the great work of decentralisation.

But apart altogether from this matter of the introduction of vegetables

which have hitherto been overlooked is another which is hardly

less important. I refer to the crude cookery which is bestowed on the

ordinary vegetables at present in daily use. That there is sny monotony

in an endless recurrence of boiled potatoes, boiled cabbage, boiled

this and boiled that, never seems to occur to the vast majority of

people in this country, who seem incapable of understanding that these

different vegetables are worthy of being served in an infinite number

of ways. It will doubtless shock those who cling to this beliefs but

the following remarks by Dr. Mitchell, an English physician practising

in Paris, directed against his own countrymen be it understood, are

forcible enough:--"The plain boiled potato," says he, "whatever else

it may be, is clearly a cattle food; so for the matter of that are

cabbages, carrots, turnips, beans, peas, and almost every other

vegetable when plain boiled. None of them in that condition would be

"refused by a cow in fair appetite." Now, there are so many appetising

ways of preparing vegetables for table, and at no additional expense,

that it is lamentable to find people offering no protest against this

feeble exhibition of culinary skill. Why, if there be nothing in the

preparation of vegetables for the table beyond plain boiling, it must

be acknowledged that Cookery has made mighty little progress since the

time it first came into existence.

Having seen, then, what faults exist and what improvements might be

made, it may well be asked how these latter are to be brought about,

or, rather, how can Australians be induced to life in accordance with

climatic requirements? The answer Is by no means easy. It may be said,

in truth, that till the great mass of the people recognise their food

faults, reform will not be of a national character. As I have already

said, the acceptation of that valuable and nutritious vegetable fruit,

the tomato, took years to accomplish. In the same way, I fear, a

universal recognition that excessive meat indulgence is a

climatic error will take many decades before it is an article of

national belief. In the schools, Cookery must form an all-important

part of a girl's education--not a superficial knowledge of the

science, but practical instruction, thorough, complete, real. The

dietetic properties of meat, vegetables, of salad vegetables, and of

fruit, from an Australian standpoint, should be so thoroughly

inculcated that a proper conception of their respective food values

should remain for a lifetime. The prizes for proficiency and excellence

in culinary matters, too, should be such as to render them worth the

winning, and serve as a stimulus for future exertions.

Is it not strange that so far ingenuity, universal approval, or general

consensus of opinions call it what you will, has not up till the

present given us an Australian national dish? Although tea and damper

instinctively arise in the mind when the matter is referred to, yet I

take it that we would all repel such an accusation if levelled against

us. Does the Australian, moreover, away from his native land perpetuate

his patriotism by oft partaking of this pastoral fare? Certainly not.

Well, when this national dish is composed and formally approved of by

the nation, let us devoutly trust that it will be a MACEDOINE of

vegetables, or a vegetable curry, or some well-concocted salad. It is

true that in one of the cookery books I have seen a dish of peaches,

dubbed PECHES A L'AUSTRALIENNE. It is a sort of compote of peaches, but

to the best of my belief it is simply entitled Australian for the sake

of giving it a name, and for no other reason.

The Art of Living in Australia Together with Three Hundred Australian Cookery Recipes and Accessory Kitchen Information by Mrs. H. Wicken · 第 9 / 14 章