I know not whether you have noticed the following:

"Droit le Roy; or, A Digest of the Rights and Prerogatives of the

Imperial Crown of Great Britain. By a Member of the Society of

Lincoln's Inn. 'Dieu et Mon Droit.' [Royal Arms, with G. R.] London:

printed and sold by W. Griffin, in Fetter Lane, MDCCLXIV."

Lord Mahon (_History of England_, vol. v. p. 175.) says:

"It was also observed, and condemned as a shallow artifice, that the

House of Lords, to counterbalance their condemnation of Wilkes's

violent democracy, took similar measures against a book of exactly

opposite principles. This was a treatise or collection of precedents

lately published under the title of _Droit le Roy_, to uphold the

prerogative of the crown against the rights of the people. The Peers,

on the motion of Lord Lyttleton, seconded by the Duke of Grafton, voted

this book 'a false, malicious, and traitorous libel, inconsistent with

the principles of the Revolution to which we owe the present happy

establishment;' they ordered that it should be burned by the hands of

the common hangman, and that the author should be taken into custody.

The latter part of the sentence, however, no one took any pains to

execute. The author was one Timothy Brecknock, a hack scribbler, who,

twenty years afterwards, was hanged for being accessary to an atrocious

murder in Ireland."

A copy of the book (an octavo of xii. and 95 pages) is in my possession. It

was apparently a presentation copy, and formerly belonged to Dr. Disney; at

whose sale it was purchased by the late Richard Heber, as his MS. note

testifies. Against the political views which this book advocates, I say not

one word; as a legal treatise it is simply despicable.

Notes and Queries, Number 228, March 11, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 102 / 161 题