BOOKS BURNED BY THE COMMON HANGMAN.

(Vol. viii., pp. 272. 346. 625.; Vol. ix., p. 78.)

The well-known law dictionary, entitled _The Interpreter_, by John Cowel,

LL.D., was burned (1610) under a proclamation of James I. (D'Israeli's

_Calamities of Authors_, ed. 1840, p. 133.)

In June, 1622, the Commentary of David Pare, or Paraeus _On the Epistle to

the Romans_, was burned at London, Oxford, and Cambridge, by order of the

Privy Council. (Wood's _Hist. and Antiq. of Univ. of Oxford_, ed. Gutch,

vol. ii. pp. 341-345.; Cooper's _Annals of Cambridge_, vol. iii. pp. 143,

144.)

On the 12th of February, 1634, _Elenchus Religionis Papisticae_, by John

Bastwicke, M.D., was ordered to be burned by the High Commission Court.

(Prynne's _New Discovery of the Prelates' Tyranny_, p. 132.)

On the 10th of February, 1640-1 the House of Lords ordered that two books

published by John Pocklington, D.D., entitled _Altare Christianum_, and

_Sunday no Sabbath_, should be publicly burned in the city of London and

the two Universities, by the hands of the common executioner; and on the

10th of March the House ordered the Sheriffs of London and the

Vice-Chancellors of both the Universities, forthwith to take care and see

the order of the House carried into execution. (_Lords' Journals_, vol. iv.

pp. 161. 180.)

On the 13th of August, 1660, Charles II. issued a proclamation against

Milton's _Defensio pro Populo Anglicano_, his _Answer to the Portraiture of

his Sacred Majesty in his Solitude and Sufferings_, and a book by John

Goodwin, late of Coleman Street, London, Clerk, entitled _The Obstructors

of Justice_. All copies of these books were to be brought to the sheriffs

of counties, who were to cause the same to be publicly burned by the hands

of the common hangman at the next assizes. (Kennett's _Register and

Chronicle_, p. 207.) This proclamation is also printed in Collet's _Relics

of Literature_, with the inaccurate date 1672, and the absurd statement

that no copy of the proclamation was discovered till 1797.

In January, 1692-3, a pamphlet by Charles Blount, Esq., entitled _King

William and Queen Mary, Conquerors, &c._, was burned by the common hangman

in Palace Yard, Westminster. (Bohun's _Autobiography_, ed. S. W. Rix, vol.

xxiv. pp. 106, 109. 113.; Wilson's _Life of De Foe_, vol. i. p. 179 _n_.)

The same parliament consigned to the flames Bishop Burnet's _Pastoral

Letter_, which had been published 1689. (Wilson's _Life of De Foe_, vol. i.

p. 179.)

On the 31st of July, 1693, the second volume of Anthony a Wood's _Athenae

Oxonienses_ was burned in the Theatre Yard at Oxford by the Apparitor of

the University, in pursuance of the sentence of the University Court in a

prosecution for a libel on the memory of Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon.

(_Life of Mr. Anthony a Wood_, ed. 1772, p. 377.)

On the 25th of February, 1702-3, the House of Commons ordered De Foe's

_Shortest Way with the Dissenters_ to be burned by the hands of the common

hangman on the morrow in New Palace Yard. (Wilson's _Life of De Foe_, vol.

ii. p. 62.)

In or about 1709, John Humphrey, an aged non-conformist minister, having

published a pamphlet against the Test, and circulated it amongst the

members of parliament, was cited before a committee, and his work was

ordered to be burned by the common hangman. (Wilson's _Life of De Foe_,

vol. iii. p. 52.)

The _North Briton_, No. 45., was on the 3rd of December, 1763, burned by

the common hangman at the Royal Exchange, by order of the House of {227}

Commons. The following account is from Malcolm's _Anecdotes of London_,

4to., 1808, p. 282.:

"The 3rd of December was appointed for this silly ceremony, which took

place before the Royal Exchange, amidst the hisses and execrations of

the mob, not directed at the obnoxious paper, but at Alderman Harley,

the sheriffs, and constables, the latter of whom were compelled to

fight furiously through the whole business. The instant the hangman

held the work to a lighted link it was beat to the ground, and the

populace, seizing the faggots prepared to complete its destruction,

fell upon the peace-officers and fairly threshed them from the field;

nor did the alderman escape without a contusion on the head, inflicted

by a bullet thrown through the glass of his coach; and several other

persons had reason to repent the attempt to burn that publicly which

the _sovereign people_ determined to approve, who afterwards exhibited

a large _jack-boot_ at Temple Bar, and burnt it in triumph, unmolested,

as a species of retaliation."

I am not aware that what Mr. Malcolm terms a "silly ceremony" has been

repeated since 1763.

Notes and Queries, Number 228, March 11, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 100 / 161 题