THE MUSIC OF THE HEBREWS AND THE HINDUS

The music of the Hebrews presents one of the most interesting

subjects in musical history, although it has an unfortunate

defect in common with so many kindred subjects, namely,

that the most learned dissertation must invariably end with

a question mark. When we read in Josephus that Solomon had

200,000 singers, 40,000 harpers, 40,000 sistrum players, and

200,000 trumpeters, we simply do not believe it. Then too

there is lack of unanimity in the matter of the essential

facts. One authority, describing the _machol_, says it is

a stringed instrument resembling a modern viola; another

describes it as a wind instrument somewhat like a bagpipe;

still another says it is a metal ring with a bell attachment

like an Egyptian sistrum; and finally an equally respected

authority claims that the _machol_ was not an instrument at

all, but a dance. Similarly the _maanim_ has been described

as a trumpet, a kind of rattle box with metal clappers, and

we even have a full account in which it figures as a violin.

The temple songs which we know have evidently been much

changed by surrounding influences, just as in modern synagogues

the architecture has not held fast to ancient Hebrew models

but has been greatly influenced by different countries and

peoples. David may be considered the founder of Hebrew music,

and his reign has been well called an "idyllic episode in the

otherwise rather grim history of Israel."

Of the instruments named in the Scriptures, that called the

harp in our English translation was probably the _kinnor_,

a kind of lyre played by means of a plectrum, which was a

small piece of metal, wood, or bone. The psaltery or _nebel_

(which was of course derived from the Egyptian _nabla_, just

as the _kinnor_ probably was in some mysterious manner derived

from the Chinese _kin_) was a kind of dulcimer or zither, an

oblong box with strings which were struck by small hammers. The

timbrel corresponds to our modern tambourine. The _schofar_

and _keren_ were horns. The former was the well-known ram's horn

which is still blown on the occasion of the Jewish New Year.

In the Talmud mention is made of an organ consisting of ten

pipes which could give one hundred different sounds, each pipe

being able to produce ten tones. This mysterious instrument was

called _magrepha_, and although but one Levite (the Levites were

the professional musicians among the Hebrews) was required to

play it, and although it was only about three feet in length,

its sound was so tremendous that it could be heard ten miles

away. Hieronymus speaks of having heard it on the Mount of

Olives when it was played in the Temple at Jerusalem. To add

to the mystery surrounding this instrument, it has been proved

by several learned authorities that it was merely a large drum;

and, to cap the climax, other equally respected writers have

declared that this instrument was simply a large shovel which,

after being used for the sacrificial fire in the temple, was

thrown to the ground with a great noise, to inform the people

that the sacrifice was consummated.

It is reasonably certain that the seemingly incongruous titles

to the Psalms were merely given to denote the tune to which

they were to be sung, just as in our modern hymns we use the

words _Canterbury_, _Old Hundredth_, _China_, etc.

The word _selah_ has never been satisfactorily explained, some

readings giving as its meaning "forever," "hallelujah," etc.,

while others say that it means repeat, an inflection of the

voice, a modulation to another key, an instrumental interlude,

a rest, and so on without end.

Of one thing we may be certain regarding the ancient Hebrews,

namely, that their religion brought something into the world

that can never again be lost. It fostered idealism, and gave

mankind something pure and noble to live for, a religion

over which Christianity shed the sunshine of divine mercy

and hope. That the change which was to be wrought in life was

sharply defined may be seen by comparing the great songs of the

different nations. For up to that time a song of praise meant

praise of a _King_. He was the sun that warmed men's hearts,

the being from whom all wisdom came, and to whom men looked

for mercy. If we compare the Egyptian hymns with those of the

Hebrews, the difference is very striking. On the walls of the

great temples of Luxor and the Ramesseum at Thebes, as well as

on the wall of the temple of Abydos and in the main hall of the

great rock-hewn temple of Abu-Simbel, in Nubia, is carved the

"Epic of Pentaur," the royal Egyptian scribe of Rameses II:

My king, his arms are mighty, his heart is firm. He

bends his bow and none can resist him. Mightier

than a hundred thousand men he marches forward. His

counsel is wise and when he wears the royal crown,

Alef, and declares his will, he is the protector of

his people. His heart is like a mountain of iron. Such

is King Rameses.

If we turn to the Hebrew prophets, this is their song:

The mountains melted from before the Lord and before

Him went the pestilence; burning coals went forth at

His feet. Hell is naked before Him and destruction

hath no covering. He hangeth the earth upon nothing

and the pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished

at His reproof. Though He slay me, yet will I trust

in Him. For I know that my Redeemer liveth, and at

the last day He shall stand upon the earth.

As with the Hebrews, music among the Hindus was closely

bound to religion. When, 3000 years before the Christian era,

that wonderful, tall, white Aryan race of men descended upon

India from the north, its poets already sang of the gods,

and the Aryan gods were of a different order from those known

to that part of the world; for they were beautiful in shape,

and friendly to man, in great contrast to the gods of the

Davidians, the pre-Aryan race and stock of the Deccan. These

songs formed the _Rig-Veda_, and are the nucleus from which

all Hindu religion and art emanate.

We already know that when the auxiliary speech which we call

music was first discovered, or, to use the language of all

primitive nations, when it was first bestowed on man by the

gods, it retained much of the supernatural potency that its

origin would suggest. In India, music was invested with divine

power, and certain hymns--especially the prayer or chant of

Vashishtha--were, according to the _Rig-Veda_, all powerful in

battle. Such a magic song, or chant, was called a _brahma_,

and he who sang it a _brahmin_. Thus the very foundation of

Brahminism, from which rose Buddhism in the sixth century

B.C., can be traced back to the music of the sacred songs of

the _Rig-Veda_ of India. The priestly or Brahmin caste grew

therefore from the singers of the Vedic hymns. The Brahmins

were not merely the keepers of the sacred books, or Vedas, the

philosophy, science, and laws of the ancient Hindus (for that is

how the power of the caste developed), but they were also the

creators and custodians of its secular literature and art. Two

and a half thousand years later Prince Gautama or Buddha died,

after a life of self-sacrifice and sanctity. On his death five

hundred of his disciples met in a cave near Rajagriha to gather

together his sayings, and chanted the lessons of their great

master. These songs became the bible of Buddhism, just as the

_Vedas_ are the bible of Brahminism, for the Hindu word for

a Buddhist council means literally "a singing together."

Besides the sacred songs of the Brahmins and Buddhists, the

Hindus had many others, some of which partook of the occult

powers of the hymns, occult powers that were as strongly marked

as those of Hebrew music. For while the latter are revealed in

the playing of David before Saul, in the influence of music on

prophecy, the falling of the walls of Jericho at the sound of

the trumpets of Joshua, etc., in India the same supernatural

power was ascribed to certain songs. For instance, there were

songs that could be sung only by the gods, and one of them, so

the legend runs, if sung by a mortal, would envelop the singer

in flames. The last instance of the singing of this song was

during the reign of Akbar, the great Mogul emperor (about 1575

A.D.). At his command the singer sang it standing up to his

neck in the river Djaumna, which, however, did not save him,

for, according to the account, the water around him boiled,

and he was finally consumed by a flame of fire. Another of

Akbar's singers caused the palace to be wrapped in darkness

by means of one of these magic songs, and another averted a

famine by causing rain to fall when the country was threatened

by drought. Animals were also tamed by means of certain songs,

the only relic of which is found in the serpent charmers'

melodies, which, played on a kind of pipe, seem to possess the

power of controlling cobras and the other snakes exhibited by

the Indian fakirs.

Many years before Gautama's time, the brahmas or singers of

sacred songs of ancient India formed themselves into a caste or

priesthood; and the word "Brahma," from meaning a sacred singer,

became the name of the supreme deity; in time, as the nation

grew, other gods were taken into the religion. Thus we find in

pre-Buddha times the trinity of gods: Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva,

with their wives, Sarasvati or learning, Lakshmi or beauty,

and Paravati, who was also called Kali, Durga, and Mahadevi,

and was practically the goddess of evil. Of these gods Brahma's

consort, Sarasvati, the goddess of speech and learning, brought

to earth the art of music, and gave to mankind the _Vina_.

This instrument is still in use and may be called the national

instrument of India. It is composed of a cylindrical pipe,

often bamboo, about three and a half feet long, at each end

of which is fixed a hollow gourd to increase the tone. It is

strung lengthwise with seven metal wires held up by nineteen

wooden bridges, just as the violin strings are supported by a

bridge. The scale of the instrument proceeds in half tones from

[F: a,] to [G: b''] The tones are produced by plucking the

strings with the fingers (which are covered with a kind of

metal thimble), and the instrument is held so that one of

the gourds hangs over the left shoulder, just as one would

hold a very long-necked banjo.

It is to the Krishna incarnation of Vishnu that the Hindu scale

is ascribed. According to the legend, Krishna or Vishnu came to

earth and took the form of a shepherd, and the nymphs sang to

him in many thousand different keys, of which from twenty-four

to thirty-six are known and form the basis of Hindu music. To

be sure these keys, being formed by different successions of

quarter-tones, are practically inexhaustible, and the 16,000

keys of Krishna are quite practicable. The differences in tone,

however, were so very slight that only a few, of them have

been retained to the present time.

The Hindus get their flute from the god Indra, who, from being

originally the all-powerful deity, was relegated by Brahminism

to the chief place among the minor gods--from being the god

of light and air he came to be the god of music. His retinue

consisted of the _gandharvas_, and _apsaras_, or celestial

musicians and nymphs, who sang magic songs. After the rise and

downfall of Buddhism in India the term _raga_ degenerated to

a name for a merely improvised chant to which no occult power

was ascribed.

The principal characteristics in modern Hindu music are a

seemingly instinctive sense of harmony; and although the actual

chords are absent, the melodic formation of the songs plainly

indicates a feeling for modern harmony, and even form. The

actual scale resembles our European scale of twelve semitones

(twenty-two _s'rutis_, quarter-tones), but the modal development

of these sounds has been extraordinary. Now a "mode" is the

manner in which the notes of a scale are arranged. For instance,

in our major mode the scale is arranged as follows: tone,

tone, semitone, tone, tone, tone, semitone. In India there

are at present seventy-two modes in use which are produced by

making seventy-two different arrangements of the scale by means

of sharps and flats, the only rule being that each degree of

the scale must be represented; for instance, one of the modes

_Dehrasan-Karabharna_ corresponds to our major scale. Our minor

(harmonic) scale figures as _Kyravani_. _Tanarupi_ corresponds

to the following succession of notes,

[G: c' d-' e--' f' g' a+' b' c'']

_Gavambodi_, to [G: c' d-' e-' f+' g' a-' b--' c'']

_Maya-Malavagaula_, to [G: c' d' e-' f' g-' a' b-' c'']

It can thus easily be seen how the seventy-two modes are

possible and practicable. Observe that the seven degrees of

the scale are all represented in these modes, the difference

between them being in the placing of half-tones by means of

sharps or flats. Not content with the complexity that this modal

system brought into their music, the Hindus have increased it

still more by inventing a number of formulae called _ragas_

(not to be confounded with those rhapsodical songs, the modern

descendant of the magic chants, previously mentioned).

In making a Hindu melody (which of course must be in one of

the seventy-two modes, just as in English we should say that a

melody must be in one of our two modes, either major or minor)

one would have to conform to one of the _ragas_, that is to

say, the melodic outline would have to conform to certain

rules, both in ascending and descending. These rules consist

of omitting notes of the modes, in one manner when the melody

ascends, and in another when it descends. Thus, in the _raga_

called _Mohanna_, in ascending the notes must be arranged in

the following order: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8; in descending it is 8,

7, 5, 4, 2, 1. Thus if we wished to write a melody in the mode

_Tanarupi_--_raga Mohanna_--we could never use the fourth,

F, or the seventh, B, if our melody ascended; if our melody

descended we should have to avoid the sixth, A[sharp], and the

third, E[double-flat]. As one can easily perceive, many strange

melodic effects are produced by these means. For instance,

in the _raga Mohanna_, in which the fourth and seventh degrees

of the scale are avoided in ascending, if it were employed in

the mode _Dehrasin-Karabharna_, which corresponds to our own

major scale, it would have a pronounced Scotch tinge so long

as the melody ascended; but let it _descend_ and the Scotch

element is deserted for a decided North American Indian,

notably Sioux tinge. The Hindus are an imaginative race, and

invest all these _ragas_ and modes with mysterious attributes,

such as anger, love, fear, and so on. They were even personified

as supernatural beings; each had his or her special name and

history. It was proper to use some of them only at midday,

some in the morning, and some at night. If the mode or _raga_

is changed during a piece, it is expressed in words, by saying,

for instance, that "_Mohanna_" (the new "_raga_") is here

introduced to the family of _Tanarupi_. The melodies formed

from these modes and _ragas_ are divided into four classes,

_Rektah_, _Teranah_, _Tuppah_, and _Ragni_. The _Rektah_ is in

character light and flowing. It falls naturally into regular

periods, and resembles the _Teranah_, with the exception that

the latter is only sung by men. The character of the _Tuppah_

is not very clear, but the _Ragni_ is a direct descendant

of the old magic songs and incantations; in character it is

rhapsodical and spasmodic.

Critical and Historical Essays Lectures delivered at Columbia University · 第 24 / 115 题