DR. HOUSE AND SIR JOHN BOWRING

The confidences were not all from the Siamese side. Sir John

Bowring told Dr. House privately that he had “come with an

olive branch in my hand, but behind me—!” and that he had been

reluctant to undertake the mission but had received letters from

the king urging him to come. The Siamese officials were so ready

for negotiations that they readily acquiesced in the English

proposals; and, apart from the preliminary ceremonies, the complete

negotiations were accomplished within a week.

In his book, _The Kingdom and People of Siam_, which gives a

detailed account of his mission, Sir John includes several lengthy

memoranda which he attributes to a “certain foreign gentleman long

resident in Siam.” Many of these are to be found recorded in Dr.

House’s private journal at various dates preceding the arrival of

the British envoy. His narrative of the scenes attendant upon the

choice of Mongkut is almost verbatim from the doctor’s account.

He highly praises the progressive spirit and the keen mind of the

prime minister, contrasting him with the usual Oriental diplomat,

and adds:

“I learned that on one occasion he sent for a foreign

gentleman whose opinion he greatly valued, and in the

presence of many persons entered upon a dialogue in which

the foreign gentleman was to impersonate J. Bowring in a

discussion of the expected proposals.”

Thereupon follows the dialogue in full. The original of this

unique rehearsal in diplomatic combat is found in the doctor’s

journal as a record of his interview with the prime minister after

it was learned that England was to send a mission. Sir John also

accredits the minister with a confession of belief in one supreme

Divine Being, ascribing his information to a “certain gentleman”;

this confession, Dr. House says, was made to him personally and

acknowledges in a letter that he had reported it to the British

envoy. The number and extent of these and still other quotations

shows that Sir John Bowring had gleaned much of his knowledge of

the Siamese from Dr. House.

* * * * *

During his sojourn in Bangkok Sir John Bowring attended service at

the mission one Sunday. Dr. House records the visit, noting that in

alphabetical order it was his turn to preach, and confesses that

he felt a little secret trembling in the presence of the august

visitor. Sir John, in his account of the visit, adds that the

“congregation very sweetly sang one of my hymns”—for he is the

same Sir John Bowring whose name ranks high in hymnology, being

the author of these hymns, among others: “_God is Love, His Mercy

Brightens_,” “_Watchman, Tell Us of the Night_,” and “_In the Cross

of Christ I Glory_.”

As a broad and deep student of human affairs and one obviously

sympathetic with missions, Sir John’s estimate of the work in Siam

at that period and of the peculiarly obstinate nature of Buddhism

is noteworthy. Concerning Buddhism he says:

“Buddhism by habit and education is become almost a part

of Siamese nature; and that nature will not bend to foreign

influence. The Siamese, whether or not they have religious

convictions, have habits which the teaching of strangers will

not easily change.”

Concerning the influence of the missionaries he says:

“Much influence is really possessed by the missionaries. They

have rendered eminent services in the medical and chirurgical

fields; they have lent great assistance to the spirit of

philosophical inquiry; many of them have been councillors

and favourites of king and nobles, admitted to intimate

intercourse and treated with a deference which could not but

elevate them in the eyes of a prostrate, reverential and

despotically governed people.”

But concerning the prospects of success for the Gospel the diplomat

is not so optimistic:

“I know not what is to impede religious teachings in Siam,

but at the same time I fear there is little ground to

expect a change in the national faith. Neither Catholic nor

Protestant speaks hopefully on the subject.”

The significance of that statement, written for the year 1855, lies

chiefly in its contrast with the fact of the certain if slow growth

of Christianity in Siam and the record of attainment to date.

Even the keenest human observer cannot forecast the fruits of the

Spirit’s work.

Samuel Reynolds House of Siam, pioneer medical missionary, 1847-1876 · 第 69 / 120 题