LAST TALK WITH LENIN

I went to see Lenin the day after the Review in the Red

Square, and the general holiday in honour of the Third

International. The first thing he said was: "I am afraid that

the Jingoes in England and France will make use of

yesterday's doings as an excuse for further action against

us. They will say 'How can we leave them in peace when

they set about setting the world on fire?' To that I would

answer, 'We are at war, Messieurs! And just as during

your war you tried to make revolution in Germany, and

Germany did make trouble in Ireland and India, so we,

while we are at war with you, adopt the measures that are

open to us. We have told you we are willing to make

peace.'"

He spoke of Chicherin's last note, and said they based all

their hopes on it. Balfour had said somewhere, "Let the fire

burn itself out." That it would not do. But the quickest

way of restoring good conditions in Russia was, of course,

peace and agreement with the Allies. "I am sure we could

come to terms, if they want to come to terms at all.

England and America would be willing, perhaps, if their

hands were not tied by France. But intervention in the

large sense can now hardly be. They must have learnt that

Russia could never be governed as India is governed, and

that sending troops here is the same thing as sending them

to a Communist University."

I said something about the general hostility to their

propaganda noticeable in foreign countries.

Lenin. "Tell them to build a Chinese wall round each of

their countries. They have their customs-officers, their

frontiers, their coast-guards. They can expel any

Bolsheviks they wish. Revolution does not depend on

propaganda. If the conditions of revolution are not there no

sort of propaganda will either hasten or impede it. The war

has brought about those conditions in all countries, and I

am convinced that if Russia today were to be swallowed up

by the sea, were to cease to exist altogether, the revolution

in the rest of Europe would go on. Put Russia under

water for twenty years, and you would not affect by a

shilling or an hour a week the demand, of the

shop-stewards in England."

I told him, what I have told most of them many times, that I

did not believe there would be a revolution in England.

Lenin. "We have a saying that a man may have typhoid

while still on his legs. Twenty, maybe thirty years ago I had

abortive typhoid, and was going about with it,

had had it some days before it knocked me over. Well,

England and France and Italy have caught the disease

already. England may seem to you to be untouched, but the

microbe is already there."

I said that just as his typhoid was abortive typhoid, so the

disturbances in England to which he alluded might well be

abortive revolution, and come to nothing. I told him the

vague, disconnected character of the strikes and the

generally liberal as opposed to socialist character of the

movement, so far as it was political at all, reminded me of

what I had heard of 1905 in Russia and not at all of

1917, and that I was sure it would settle down.

Lenin. "Yes, that is possible. It is, perhaps, an educative

period, in which the English workmen will come to realize

their political needs, and turn from liberalism to Socialism.

Socialism is certainly weak in England. Your socialist

movements, your socialist parties . . . when I was in

England I zealously attended everything I could, and for a

country with so large an industrial population they were

pitiable, pitiable . . . a handful at a street corner . . . a

meeting in a drawing room . . . a school class . . . pitiable.

But you must remember one great difference between

Russia of 1905 and England of to-day. Our first Soviet in

Russia was made during the revolution. Your

shop-stewards committees have been in existence

long before. They are without programme, without

direction, but the opposition they will meet will force

a programme upon them."

Speaking of the expected visit of the Berne delegation, he

asked me if I knew MacDonald, whose name had been

substituted for that of Henderson in later telegrams

announcing their coming. He ,said: "I am very glad

MacDonald is coming instead of Henderson. Of course

MacDonald is not a Marxist in any sense of the word, but

he is at least interested in theory, and can therefore be

trusted to do his best to understand what is happening here.

More than that we do not ask."

We then talked a little on a subject that interests me very

much, namely, the way in which insensibly, quite apart

from war, the Communist theories are being modified in the

difficult process of their translation into practice. We

talked of the changes in "workers' control," which is now a

very different thing from the wild committee business that

at first made work almost impossible. We talked then of

the antipathy of the peasants to compulsory communism,

and how that idea also had been considerably whittled

away. I asked him what were going to be the relations

between the Communists of the towns and the

property-loving peasants, and whether there was

not great danger of antipathy between them, and said

I regretted leaving too soon to see the elasticity of

the Communist theories tested by the inevitable

pressure of the peasantry.

Lenin said that in Russia there was a pretty sharp

distinction between the rich peasants and the poor. "The

only opposition we have here in Russia is directly or

indirectly due to the rich peasants. The poor, as soon as

they are liberated from the political domination of the rich,

are on our side and are in an enormous majority."

I said that would not be so in the Ukraine, where property

among the peasants is much more equally distributed.

Lenin. "No. And there, in the Ukraine, you will certainly

see our policy modified. Civil war, whatever happens, is

likely to be more bitter in the Ukraine than elsewhere,

because there the instinct of property has been further

developed in the peasantry, and the minority and majority

will be more equal."

He asked me if I meant to return, saying that I could go

down to Kiev to watch the revolution there as I had

watched it in Moscow. I said I should be very sorry to

think that this was my last visit to the country which I

love only second to my own. He laughed, and paid me the

compliment of saying that, "although English," I had more

or less succeeded in understanding what they were at, and

that he should be pleased to see me again.

Russia in 1919 · 第 37 / 38 题