For many years strenuous efforts have been made to sell the idea that

the federal government and everything connected with it is straight and

efficient. The Metropolitan Police force is an agency of the United

States government. Only Gilbert and Sullivan could do justice to it, as

a comic opera. But the laughs are costly.

The boss of the force carries the complicated title of Major and

Superintendent. His name is Robert J. Barrett and he got the job

because he was related to the former chief.

A fantastic story made the front pages last year, then was hushed

and forgotten. Police Captain Anthony Richitt charged under oath,

before a Congressional investigating committee, that he had been

ordered by Police Inspector Jeffreys to turn in a false report on a

gambling complaint. He also swore that the District crime investigating

sub-committee was worrying the police chief, who, he said, was on

intimate terms with gambler Emmitt Warring; and further, that Warring

delivered messages from the chief to precinct captains.

Such charges elsewhere would have popped up a seething scandal, at

least a grand jury to-do, with the probability of new brass in the

police department. It took a long time, but even in Chicago the

police commissioner, the county chairman and the millionaire chief

investigator for the State’s Attorney quit after publication of

_Chicago Confidential_.

You think anything like that happened in Washington? In this home of

laissez faire the grand jury wasn’t interested even to the extent of

whitewashing the mud.

The incident was treated as a private feud. It was officially settled

on the records when Richitt apologized to his boss, in a public

apology, six words long:

“I regret the incident ever occurred.”

No explanation, no retraction, no withdrawal of the charges.

Barrett’s reply was nearly as short:

“Richitt has complied with the orders of the department as far as I am

concerned.”

Thus was departmental satisfaction restored. But there was no

satisfaction for the public. No determination was ever made as to

whether the chief had ordered his subordinate to falsify arrest

records. It was decided by all concerned that this was of no interest

to the tax-payers, the grand jury included.

Barrett had forgotten he had told the press he had what he called

“evidence tending to show perjury” on the subject of Captain Richitt.

Chairman Davis of the House District Sub-Committee, before which the

stink started, got into the act and announced he, too, had closed the

book on the affair.

The terms of the deal apparently were such that neither Barrett nor

Richitt are ever again to question the other’s activities. Some months

before, evidence was brought forth that Richitt had bought seven autos

in addition to the one he was driving during 27 post-war months, when

civilians could get cars only in the black market. No explanation was

volunteered by anyone, though Richitt had sold most of the cars as soon

as he bought them.

Your authors know this is a common practice in police departments all

over the country.

A sergeant of the Bridgeport, Connecticut, force was fired for similar

activities. Many cops used their emergency priorities to order cars

which they then transferred to dealers, without ever taking possession.

The cops rarely handled the money. The dealer went with them to accept

delivery and paid the purchase price, the cops chiseling from $500 to

$1,000 on each transaction.

When we arrived in Washington to dig for this book, we asked: “Who

makes the fixes?”

In other cities, contacts are closed with precinct, ward and district

leaders of the political party in office. If you want to retail

women, make book, land pickpocketing privileges or get a summons or a

violation squared, you go to see this local boss.

If money is to be passed it goes through him. Many favors are granted

in return for party loyalty, votes or campaign contributions. He takes

care of those, too. The leader passes the word along to city hall,

where it is relayed to the local police station. In some towns, Chicago

for example, the channels are short-circuited in advance, so the leader

can go direct to his police captain.

But what happens in Washington, where there are no voters, so there are

no district leaders? How do you fix the cops? Who is the collector?

Some naive Washingtonians said there is no such thing. There is no

collecting. There is no graft.

That is cockeyed. The payoff is through the local police captain, who

acts as the collector for anyone in the District Government who is to

be fixed. The captain retains his own percentage of the boodle, plus

anything he can steal, then passes the balance up above, through the

regularly established channels.

Such a system plays hell with the poor cops on the street. The guy who

pays the captain for protection knows he doesn’t have to take care of

underlings. The most the uniformed patrolman is good for is a meal, a

cigar and an occasional five-spot. Vice squad men and detectives can

sometimes do a little modest shaking, but not enough to get rich on.

A police captain told us this story: Two Chicago detectives came to

Washington to pick up a wanted prisoner. It is the custom among all

police departments to entertain cops visiting on business. Washington

has no fund for such purposes. Its men are so poorly paid, they can’t

treat. But the two assigned to keep the visitors happy had worked the

bright-light belt, so they knew where they could cuff a few small night

clubs. During the evening, one Chicago detective asked the Washington

cop, “What is your job worth?”

The reply was, “I get $3,300 a year?”

“No, I don’t mean your salary; what’s it worth?”

The Washingtonian looked puzzled. The policemen from the Windy City

said, “You can talk freely. We’re friends. No wise cop in Chicago would

take the job unless he could pick up at least $10,000 a year on the

side.”

Washington policemen who can average $20 a week extra consider

themselves lucky. Not so many higher officers.

Internal Revenue agents, who never allow themselves to be quoted, told

us some officers have safe deposit-vaults choked with big bills. But

many others are honest, like chumps. They have to go along with the

crooks to hold their jobs. They can’t squawk without implicating too

many important higher-ups.

Salaries of Washington policemen range from a take-home pay of only

$200 a month for the lowest-grade patrolman to about $10,000 a year

gross for the chief. Military ranks are used. Private, sixth grade, the

highest non-officer rank, pays $3,750 a year. A corporal gets $4,025, a

sergeant $4,228, a lieutenant $4,600, and a captain $5,300. That’s the

salary on which Captain Richitt bought eight cars in 27 months.

If the fix you’re after is of a nature which the local precinct

captain can’t handle, you go through a certain District Commission

employe who is the bagman for one of the three District Commissioners.

The Commission is the immediate boss of the police department. Any

commissioner can issue orders to the chief.

There are occasions, however, when a really strong in is needed.

Washington is federal territory and is ruled nominally by the national

administration. In such an instance, the guy who wants to call the cops

off has to try other doors. The odds are, even if he is in business in

Washington, he has his roots elsewhere. Many Washingtonians maintain

voting addresses in the states from which they originally came. Others

have friends, partners and relatives in various states.

The procedure is to make the connection through a Democratic county

committeeman back home or through a member of Congress in the home

state. Congress is the ruler of the District, and almost every

Congressman is as busy as a Chicago alderman fixing everything from

parking tags to felony warrants.

It is similar when a cop needs influence to square a rap or get an

appointment or a promotion. Elsewhere we know that being a paid-up

member of the local political club never hurt the career of a

policeman. Here there are no political clubs, and most cops are not

even Washingtonians. Their jobs are not confined to locals, but are

open to all American citizens, regardless of residence. You can take a

civil service test back home in Oskaloosa, then arrive in Washington a

full-fledged policeman.

Most Washingtonians don’t even want to get on the force at the

penny-ante salary. But $3,000 a year looks good to a cotton-picker in

Mississippi, where the annual per capita income is $600. When he gets

to Washington he finds the $600 back home goes further than $3,000 here.

So, what does a cop do when he needs help? He follows the procedure

outlined above. If he comes from out of town he corresponds with his

local ward-heeler or goes directly to his Congressman on Capitol Hill.

We asked one cop, “What do you do if you’re a native of Washington and

have no vote?”

He replied, “You’re just out of luck.”

That is, unless you’re a Negro.

The Washington force had some fine colored cops and detectives,

native-born men who decided to make a career of police work in the

days before Washington was flooded with the displaced from the

plantations in the Deep South. In those days Negroes got no special

privileges in Washington. Now almost all of the 300 colored policemen

are political appointees. The white applicant undergoes a rigid and

rigorous investigation; Negroes are forced on the force even over the

disapproval of the department’s intelligence squad.

Many colored policemen have rackets on the side, are gamblers, operate

whore-houses or do a little pimping.

The frequency with which the following happens is too great to set it

aside as a mere isolated example: White cops tell you colored ones

often stop pretty white women drivers, bawl them out and threaten them

with arrests until they cry, then offer to square it for some petting.

Testimony under oath, reported in a previous chapter, in which a

former sweetheart of gambler Attilio Acalotti charged she had seen

hush-money slipped to three cops, was not pursued by police brass, the

District Attorney or the grand jury. Several defendants were convicted

for trying to influence her to change her testimony, though Acalotti,

“Snags” Lewis and Frank Billeci were granted new trials on the gambling

charges.

Our indictment is not against Washington’s police. As we said, most of

them are honest, conscientious, decent citizens, thwarted by something

above their reach.

The culprit is the system. That is responsible for the childish,

irresponsible atmosphere of everything in this dizziest of American

cities.

Don’t think, despite the annual yaps for more assistance, the

Washington police force is radically undermanned. Compared to numbers

in other cities, it is not. The Metropolitan Police have the second

highest manpower per capita of any large outfit in the country. It is

not up to authorized strength, but that goes for most cities. That

doesn’t tell the story, because, as we indicated, there are at least

five other police forces operating in the city, with several hundred

more cops on tap. Generally speaking, the jurisdiction of each force is

limited to the particular area for which it was created. All Washington

policemen have the right to make arrests for crimes committed in their

presence in any part of the District. For purposes of convenience,

deals are made between various forces, so sometimes one patrols a

district which really belongs to another. For instance, if a small

square or park is situated miles away from the next nearest park, the

city police often relieve the National Park Police of the necessity of

sending squad-cars far off their regular beats.

There is a reverse, too. The Metropolitan force has about 1,800 men for

its 14 precincts and one harbor station, but men are continually called

for and assigned to guard visiting diplomats and dignitaries, and for

special duty at the White House, government establishments, and even as

ushers at tea-parties. With days off, sick leaves and men on special

assignments, the force is lucky when it can put 300 cops on the streets

on any shift.

The police are used for many duties delegated to others in

well-regulated cities. For instance, policemen must act as collection

agents for wives with delinquent husbands. Any Congressman can call and

ask for police protection, which means he may want a cop in front of

his house as a parking attendant for his private parties.

Any time the President or an important official drives through

Washington, special cops are strung along the route to clear traffic.

Wives of Congressmen and expectant mothers with a drag rate a police

escort to a hospital. Even the circus can call for a special detail of

22 men.

It is almost impossible to keep any foot patrolmen on the streets.

The force is all-motorized, that being the only way it can get around

the sprawling District. Meanwhile, there are no harness-bulls on

beats to keep toughs and thugs in line. So serious is the shortage of

personnel that the black marias attached to each of the 14 precincts

roll the streets 24 hours a day instead of being in their garages. The

patrol-wagons are equipped with two-way radios and respond to calls the

same as do squad cars. This is a help for spot work, one up on most

towns.

One chief trouble with the police department is that so few of its men

are natives. They have no local civic pride. Another factor is the

constant turnover in personnel, because of the lousy salaries and lean

pickings down below. There is no adequate pension system. In New York

they can retire on a minimum of half pay after 20 years, regardless of

age, which means a man who goes on the force at 21 can get off at 41

with a life pension. But in Washington you cannot apply for retirement

before age 55, with 25 years’ service. And even then there is no

guarantee you will be allowed to quit, as retirement is not automatic,

but at the pleasure of the board. Usually only one-third of those who

apply are permitted to quit.

On the other hand, Washington cops work an eight-hour day on an

authorized five-day week, and are not restrained from holding jobs on

the outside which don’t conflict with their assigned duties. Many own

or work in stores. Several are chauffeurs. Embassies hire them for

body-guards. Some drive cabs. A few owned fleets of them, but this was

forbidden when it was found they were using their police pull to get

their drivers off for traffic violations.

One policeman, Private John U. Carroll, managed a chile parlor in

the 700 block, 11th Street, SE. There was nothing wrong with that,

according to regulations, but the police trial board nabbed him

when he failed to report that he had been in a fist fight with some

customers in his place. According to testimony, Danny Petro, a former

professional pug, walked into the “parlor” and slugged Carroll’s pal.

That brought on a four-man melee in which the cop was injured. The

trial board fined him $75. After being restored to duty he retired,

claiming a veteran’s disability.

Though the department lowered standards because of the difficulty

of recruiting men, its record for solving crimes is still good. But

convictions and sentences are far under the American averages. The

present laws and regulations so hamper the police that even if all were

honest and intelligent, which they aren’t, serious inroads into the

crime situation would be impossible.

One of the most serious roadblocks is the fact that after they make an

arrest and hold a prisoner for the magistrate, they cannot make their

complaints to the court direct, or tell the judge what it is all about.

Washington rules require policemen to go to the U.S. Attorney and

plead with him to book a case. The prosecutor thus sits as practically

a committing magistrate, as the defendant and his lawyers are heard

at the same time, and they can bargain with him for a nolle pros or a

lesser charge.

If the U.S. Attorney decides not to handle a case, the police are sunk.

They cannot ask the municipal judge to hold or commit. In many other

jurisdictions, New York for instance, the arresting officer acts for

the state at the preliminary hearing, before a magistrate, and not only

tells his story to the judge, but can question the prisoner.

The U.S. Attorney is usually reluctant to prosecute. Even if he decides

to, the cops are due for a browbeating from the judge. This story is

no isolated incident--it is typical of what constantly goes on in the

local, politically appointed courts:

Many policemen told us the courts work against them. When they make

arrests they have to go to trial on their own time and are usually

kept sitting there all day at the pleasure of the defendant and his

lawyer. The defendant may wander around, but the policeman is required

to remain in the court until the case is called. He is not even

permitted to go to the washroom. If he does, the eagle-eyed shysters

call the case immediately, with court consent, and the defendant is

discharged--for lack of prosecution!

Several policemen who went to the toilet were threatened with contempt

citations.

From the time a policeman makes an arrest, until the final disposition

of the case, the entire atmosphere of the District enforcement

machinery is mined against him. The District Attorney’s office is

skeptical of anything he says, and is inclined to side with the

accused. The courts, frequently presided over by gangster-appointed

judges or left-wingers whose constituents are rebels against the

accepted code, bend backward. They make defendants of the cops instead

of the prisoners. So most policemen shrug and forget about it. For

instance, in the Black Belt, not one of every three known crimes is

reported. The experienced cops take it easy, go to the ball games and

dances.

The most absurd straitjacket in which the Washington police are

confined is the law which forbids them to serve warrants. They may be

served only by deputy U.S. marshals.

This completely screws up the orderly procedure, because District

judges, who are hot hell to protect the civil rights of murderers,

pimps, dope-peddlers and gamblers, refuse to hold a prisoner in most

cases unless he is arrested on a warrant. And they never uphold a John

Doe warrant.

For instance, on one occasion, two cops assigned to the vice squad at

night, working undercover on prostitution, got into a house and nabbed

several bottles of whiskey there. They called for a police car. When it

arrived, further search turned up narcotics. Twenty-six were arrested

without a warrant. The police knew the courts would not hold them for

even disorderly conduct, because arresting officers could not specify

which offense each and every one had committed. So the prisoners

were not photographed or fingerprinted. All were allowed to post $5

collateral, which was, of course, forfeited.

A cop can arrest a man whom he sees in the process of house-breaking on

burglary, but if he then fans him and finds a gun he cannot charge him

with a concealed-weapon violation, because he had no warrant for the

search. When police have information that a crime is being committed on

a premise, they must first get in touch with the U.S. Commissioner or a

judge, then locate a deputy marshal to come and serve the warrant.

But don’t you assume you can get away with anything in Washington. The

cops are death on jay-walkers. If you cross against the light you’ll

be jugged. That in Washington is more serious and more culpable than

murder!

30. HOW TO STAY OUT OF JAIL

These are the steps:

First you break the law.

Then you get pinched.

Then you hire Charlie Ford.

Who is he? Charles E. Ford is the “Fifth Street Cicero.”

Ford, a behemoth of 220 pounds, is 52. He has been practicing law in

Washington for 28 years. His father, a New Jersey Democrat, was the

public printer of the United States in 1913. Since then a lot has been

printed about his son in the public records.

As noted, Ford was the late Jimmy La Fontaine’s lawyer and is a

trustee of his estate. He appeared in Chicago to convince the Kefauver

committee it couldn’t force Anna Fischetti to testify against her

husband, Charles, the notorious Capone gangster. And he convinced it.

But not all Ford’s work is so aristocratic. He and his associates take

them as they come. Hardly a day passes without defendants in criminal

court being aided and comforted by Ford or someone from his office.

He is the darling of the gambling and prostitution fraternity. His

clients seldom go to jail. The police don’t feel so bad when they lose

to Ford as they do when other lawyers oppose them. For Ford is a great

friend of the cops. Whenever a policeman gets in trouble, Ford takes

his case, usually without fee.

Charlie is one of those big, brash, bluff guys everyone loves,

especially the newspapermen. He feeds them plenty of copy--and

liquor--and never hesitates to give them a lift when they need

background material on gangsters and criminals, without violating his

fiduciary ethics. He is a social guy who likes to entertain and who

loves to eat. One of his clients was the late Tom O’Donnell, and under

the terms of his will Charlie operates the two celebrated O’Donnell

restaurants and patronizes them freely.

Whenever his waist gets out of bounds, he goes to Hot Springs,

Arkansas, for the reducing baths and a few days of friendship and

cheer with Owney “The Killer” Madden, retired gang chieftain, now Hot

Springs’ most eminent elder statesman.

None of Charlie’s clients has ever gone to the electric chair.

One was sentenced to death for murder, but saved Charlie’s record

by considerately hanging himself in jail. So he is one up on Sam

Leibowitz, whose lone mistake waited for the ministrations of the

public executioner. But Ford is that kind of a guy. Everyone loves him.

No one would embarrass him.

We have sworn testimony before us which shows the operations of Ford’s

jail-thwarting apparatus. It usually works this way: The prisoner, who

may be a numbers peddler, a bookmaker’s runner, or a street-walker,

is booked at the police station. He or she puts in a phone call to

a certain designated unofficial party. Thereupon one of a half-dozen

bail-bond brokers gets a call, and within minutes a runner for the

bondsman appears at the police station and puts up surety for the

prisoner.

Among bailers-out utilized by the organization are James H. Conroy,

Isaac P. Jones, William P. Ryan, and Leonard, Louis, Max and Meyer

Weinstein.

The legal fee for a $500 bail bond in the District is $75. The

foregoing bondsmen charge the combine only $37.50, half-price, for

springing a protected person. The rules regarding their surety are

sketchy. They may register a $25,000 piece of property, then lay a

hundred or a thousand $25,000 bonds against it.

On release, the defendant may visit the law offices of Ford, on 5th

Street, where he is interviewed by Ford or his associate, Clifford

Allder since the resignation of James K. Hughes. But sometimes the

defendant does not speak to his counsel until the case is actually

called in court, when his lawyer--Ford or an associate--whom he has

never seen before, stands up for him at arraignment. If the defendant

has no previous convictions, Ford’s office often pleads him guilty;

whereupon the judge imposes a fine of usually not more than $25. We

have proof that the fines for many of these defendants are paid on the

spot from the lawyer’s pocket.

The system is keenly organized. Not one in a hundred people arrested

pays his own bail-bond fee or knows who contacted the bondsman or

paid him. Records of the bondsmen are kept so cryptically that in the

rare instances when they are queried under oath they can say all they

remember is they got a call from someone who only gave his first name,

to put up bail, and they have no record to show who paid them. The

rules are being changed. They must obtain a full name--but not for

public record. And they won’t ask for birth certificates, either.

The Ford office has been able to pass the buck between its members.

They cannot remember who retained them, who paid the retainer, or who

put up the money to pay the fines, if “they actually did it,” which

they “doubt.”

Washington Confidential · 第 21 / 30 段