CHAPTER VII.

Since it is seen how much the Imperial Authority and the Philosophic

are to be revered, which must support the opinions propounded, it is

now for us to return into the straight path to the intended goal. I

say, then, that this last opinion of the Common People has continued

so long that without other cause, without inquiry into any reason,

every man is termed Noble who may be the son or nephew of any brave

man, although he himself is nothing. And this is what the Song says:

And so long among us

This falsehood has had sway,

That men call him a Nobleman,

Though worthless, who can say,

I nephew am, or son,

Of one worth such a sum.

Wherefore it is to be observed that it is most dangerous negligence to

allow this evil opinion to take root; for even as weeds multiply in

the uncultivated field, and surmount and cover the ear of the corn, so

that, looking at it from a distance, the wheat appears not, and

finally the corn is lost; so the evil opinion in the mind, neither

chastised nor corrected, increases and multiplies, so that the ear of

Reason, that is, the true opinion, is concealed and buried as it were,

and so it is lost. O, how great is my undertaking in this Song, for I

wish now to weed the field so full of wild and woody plants as is this

field of the common opinion so long bereft of tillage! Certainly I do

not intend to cleanse all, but only those parts where the ears of

Reason are not entirely overcome; that is, I intend to lift up again

those in whom some little light of Reason still lives through the

goodness of their nature; the others need only as much care as the

brute beasts: wherefore it seems to me that it would not be a less

miracle to lead back to Reason him in whom it is entirely extinct than

to bring back to Life him who has been four days in the grave.

Then the evil quality of this popular opinion is narrated suddenly, as

if it were a horrible thing; it strikes at that, springing forth from

the order of the confutation, saying, "But he who sees the Truth will

know How vile he has become," in order to make people understand its

intolerable wickedness, saying, that those men lie especially, for not

only is the man vile, that is, not Noble, who, although descended from

good people, is himself wicked, but also he is most vile; and I quote

the example of the right path being indicated, where, to prove this,

it is fit for me to propound a question, and to reply to that question

in this way.

There is a plain with certain paths, a field with hedges, with

ditches, with rocks, with tanglewood, with all kinds of obstacles;

with the exception of its two straight paths. And it has snowed so

much that the snow covers everything, and presents one smooth

appearance on every side, so that no trace of any path is to be seen.

Here comes a man from one part of the country, and he wishes to go to

a house which is on the other side; and by his industry, that is,

through prudent foresight and through the goodness of genius, guided

solely by himself, he goes through the right path whither he meant to

go, leaving the prints of his footsteps behind him. Another comes

after this man, and he wishes to go to that mansion, and to him it is

only needful to follow the footprints left there; but through his own

fault this man strays from the path, which the first man without a

guide has known how to keep; this man, though it is pointed out to

him, loses his way through the brambles and the rocks, and he goes not

to the place whither he is bound.

Which of these men ought to be termed excellent, brave, or worthy? I

reply: He who went first. How would you designate that other man? I

reply: "As most vile." Why is he not called unworthy or cowardly, that

is to say, vile? I reply: Because unworthy, that is, vile, he should

be called who, having no guide, might have failed to walk

straightforward; but since this man had a guide, his error and his

fault can rise higher; and therefore he is to be called, not vile, but

most vile. And likewise he who, by his father or by some elder of his

race is ennobled, and does not continue in a noble course, not only is

he vile, but he is most vile, and deserving of as much contempt and

infamy as any other villain, if not of more. And because a man may

preserve himself from this vile baseness, Solomon lays this command on

him who has had a brave and excellent ancestor, in the twenty-second

chapter of Proverbs: "Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy

fathers have set," And previously he says, in the fourth chapter of

the said book: "The path of the Just," that is, of the worthy men, "is

as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day;

the way of the wicked is as darkness, and they know not at what they

stumble."

Finally, when it says, "And though he walks upon the earth Is counted

with the dead," to his greater disgrace I say that this most

worthless man is dead, seeming still alive. Where it is to be known

that the wicked man may be truly said to be dead, and especially he

who goes astray from the path trodden by his good ancestor. And this

it is possible to prove thus: as Aristotle says in the second book On

the Soul, to live is to be with the living; and since there are many

ways of living--as in the plants to vegetate; in the animals to

vegetate and to feel and to move; in men to vegetate, to feel, to

move, and to reason, or rather to understand; and since things ought

to be denominated by the noblest part, it is evident that in animals

to live is to feel--in the brute animals, I say; in man, to live is to

use reason. Wherefore, if to live is the life or existence of man, and

if thus to depart from the use of Reason, which is his life, is to

depart from life or existence, even thus is that man dead.

And does he not depart from the use of Reason who does not reason or

think concerning the aim of his life? And does he not depart from the

use of Reason who does not reason or think concerning the path which

he ought to take? Certainly he does so depart; and this is evident

especially in him who has the footprints before him, and looks not at

them; and therefore Solomon says in the fifth chapter of Proverbs: "He

shall die without instruction; and in the greatness of his folly he

shall go astray," that is to say, he is dead who becomes a disciple,

and who does not follow his master; and such an one is most vile.

And of him it would be possible for some one to say: How is he dead

and yet he walks? I reply, that as a man he is dead, but as a beast he

has remained alive; for as the Philosopher says in the second book On

the Soul, the powers of the Soul stand upon itself, as the figure of

the quadrangle stands upon the triangle, and the pentagon stands upon

the quadrangle; so the sensitive stands upon the vegetative, and the

intellectual stands upon the sensitive. Wherefore, as, by removing the

last side of the pentagon, the quadrangle remains, so by removing the

last power of the Soul, that is, Reason, the man no longer remains,

but a thing with a sensitive soul only, that is, the brute animal.

And this is the meaning or intention of the second part of the devised

Song, in which are placed the opinions of others.

The Banquet (Il Convito) · 第 7 / 30 章