WHAT GOD HATH CLEANSED

'There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of

the band called the Italian band, 2. A devout man, and one that feared

God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed

to God alway. 3. He saw in a vision evidently about the ninth hour of

the day an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him,

Cornelius. 4. And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What

is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come

up for a memorial before God. 5. And now send men to Joppa, and call

for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6. He lodgeth with one Simon a

tanner, whose house is by the sea-side: he shall tell thee what thou

oughtest to do. 7. And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was

departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier

of them that waited on him continually; 8. And when he had declared all

these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa. 9. On the morrow, as

they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up

upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10. And he became very

hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a

trance, 11. And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto

him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let

down to the earth: 12. Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of

the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.

13. And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14. But

Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is

common or unclean. 15. And the voice spake unto him again the second

time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16. This was

done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven. 17. Now

while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen

should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made

inquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate, 18. And called,

and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.

19. While Peter thought on the vision, the Spirit said unto him,

Behold, three men seek thee. 20. Arise therefore, and get thee down,

and go with them, doubting nothing; for I have sent them.'--ACTS x.

1-20.

The Church was at first in appearance only a Jewish sect; but the great

stride is now to be taken which carries it over the border into the

Gentile world, and begins its universal aspect. If we consider the

magnitude of the change, and the difficulties of training and prejudice

which it had to encounter in the Church itself, we shall not wonder at

the abundance of supernatural occurrences which attended it. Without

some such impulse, it is difficult to conceive of its having been

accomplished.

In this narrative we see the supernatural preparation on both sides.

God, as it were, lays His right hand on Cornelius, and His left on

Peter, and impels them towards each other. Philip had already preached

to the Ethiopian, and probably the anonymous brethren in Acts xi. 20

had already spoken the word to pure Greeks at Antioch; but the

importance of Peter's action here is that by reason of his Apostleship,

his recognition of Gentile Christians becomes the act of the whole

community. His entrance into Cornelius's house ended the Jewish phase

of the Church. The epoch was worthy of divine intervention, and the

step needed divine warrant. Therefore the abundance of miracle at this

point is not superfluous.

I. We have the vision which guided the seeker to the light. Caesarea,

as the seat of government, was the focus of Gentilism, and that the

Gospel should effect a lodgment there was significant. Still more so

was the person whom it first won,--an officer of the Roman army, the

very emblem of worldly power, loathed by every true Jew. A centurion

was not an officer of high rank, but Cornelius's name suggests the

possibility of his connection with a famous Roman family, and the name

of the 'band' or 'cohort,' of which his troop was part, suggests that

it was raised in Italy, and therefore properly officered by Romans. His

residence in Judaea had touched his spirit with some knowledge of, and

reverence for, the Jehovah whom this strange people worshipped. He was

one of a class numerous in these times of religious unrest, who had

been more or less affected by the pure monotheism of the Jew.

It is remarkable that the centurions of the New Testament are all more

or less favourably inclined towards Christ and Christianity, and the

fact has been laid hold of to throw doubt on the narratives; but it is

very natural that similarity of position and training should have

produced similarity of thought; and that three or four such persons

should have come in contact with Jesus and His Apostles makes no

violent demands on probability, while there was no occasion to mention

others who were not like-minded. Quartered for considerable periods in

the country, and brought into close contact with its religion, and

profoundly sceptical of their own, as all but the lowest minds then

were, Cornelius and his brother in arms and spirit whose faith drew

wondering praise from Jesus, are bright examples of the possibility of

earnest religious life being nourished amid grave disadvantages, and

preach a lesson, often neglected, that we should be slow to form

unfavourable opinions of classes of men, or to decide that those of

such and such a profession, or in such and such circumstances, must be

of such and such a character.

It would have seemed that the last place to look for the first Gentile

Christian would have been in the barracks at Caesarea; and yet there

God's angel went for him, and found him. It has often been discussed

whether Cornelius was a 'proselyte' or not. It matters very little. He

was drawn to the Jews' religion, had adopted their hours of prayer,

reverenced their God, had therefore cast off idolatry, gave alms to the

people as acknowledgment that their God was his God, and cultivated

habitual devotion, which he had diffused among his household, both of

slaves and soldiers. It is a beautiful picture of a soul feeling after

a deeper knowledge of God, as a plant turns its half-opened flowers to

the sun.

Such seekers do not grope without touching. It is not only 'unto the

seed of Jacob' that God has never said, 'Seek ye Me in vain.' The story

has a message of hope to all such seekers, and sheds precious light on

dark problems in regard to the relation of such souls in heathen lands

to the light and love of God, The vision appeared to Cornelius in the

manner corresponding to his spiritual susceptibility, and it came at

the hour of prayer. God's angels ever draw near to hearts opened by

desire to receive them. Not in visible form, but in reality,

'bright-harnessed angels stand' all around the chamber where prayer is

made. Our hours of supplication are God's hours of communication.

The vision to Cornelius is not to be whittled down to a mental

impression. It was an objective, supernatural appearance,--whether to

sense or soul matters little. The story gives most graphically the

fixed gaze of terror which Cornelius fastened on the angel, and very

characteristically the immediate recovery and quick question to which

his courage and military promptitude helped him. 'What is it, Lord?'

does not speak of terror, but of readiness to take orders and obey.

'Lord' seems to be but a title of reverence here.

In the angel's answer, the order in which prayers and alms are named is

the reverse of that in verse 2. Luke speaks as a man, beginning with

the visible manifestation, and passing thence to the inward devotion

which animated the external beneficence. The angel speaks as God sees,

beginning with the inward, and descending to the outward. The strong

'anthropomorphism' of the representation that man's prayer and alms

keep God in mind of him needs no vindication and little explanation. It

substitutes the mental state which in us originates certain acts for

the acts themselves. God's 'remembrance' is in Scripture frequently

used to express His loving deeds, which show that their recipient is

not forgotten of Him.

But the all-important truth in the words is that the prayers and alms

(coming from a devout heart) of a man who had never heard of Jesus

Christ were acceptable to God. None the less Cornelius needed Jesus,

and the recompense made to him was the knowledge of the Saviour. The

belief that in many a heathen heart such yearning after a dimly known

God has stretched itself towards light, and been accepted of God, does

not in the least conflict with the truth that 'there is none other Name

given among men, whereby we must be saved,' but it sheds a bright and

most welcome light of hope into that awful darkness. Christ is the only

Saviour, but it is not for us to say how far off from the channel in

which it flows the water of life may percolate, and feed the roots of

distant trees. Cornelius's religion was not a substitute for Christ,

but was the occasion of his being led to Christ, and finding full,

conscious salvation there. God leads seeking souls by His own wonderful

ways; and we may leave all such in His hand, assured that no heart ever

hungered after righteousness and was not filled.

The instruction to send for Peter tested Cornelius's willingness to be

taught by an unknown Jew, and his belief in the divine origin of the

vision. The direction given by which to find this teacher was not

promising. A lodger in a tan-yard by the seaside was certainly not a

man of position or wealth. But military discipline helped religious

reverence; and without delay, as soon as the angel 'was departed' (an

expression which gives the outward reality of the appearance strongly),

Cornelius's confidential servants, sympathisers with him in his

religion, were told all the story, and before nightfall were on their

march to Joppa. Swift obedience to whatever God points out as our path

towards the light, even if it seem somewhat unattractive, will always

mark our conduct if we really long for the light, and believe that He

is pointing our way.

II. The vision which guided the light-bearer to the seeker.--All

through the night the messengers marched along the maritime plain in

which both Caesarea and Joppa lay, much discussing, no doubt, their

strange errand, and wondering what they would find. The preparation of

Peter, which was as needful as that of Cornelius, was so timed as to be

completed just as the messengers stood at the tanner's door.

The first point to note in regard to it is its scene. It is of

subordinate importance, but it can scarcely have been entirely

unmeaning, that the flashing waters of the Mediterranean, blazing in

midday sunshine, stretched before Peter's eyes as he sat on the

housetop 'by the seaside.' His thoughts may have travelled across the

sea, and he may have wondered what lay beyond the horizon, and whether

there were men there to whom Christ's commission extended. 'The isles'

of which prophecy had told that they should 'wait for His law' were

away out in the mysterious distance. Some expansion of spirit towards

regions beyond may have accompanied his gaze. At all events, it was by

the shore of the great highway of nations and of truth that the vision

which revealed that all men were 'cleansed' filled the eye and heart of

the Apostle, and told him that, in his calling as 'fisher of men,' a

wider water than the land-locked Sea of Galilee was his.

We may also note the connection of the form of the vision with his

circumstances. His hunger determined its shape. The natural bodily

sensations coloured his state of mind even in trance, and afforded the

point of contact for God's message. It does not follow that the vision

was only the consequence of his hunger, as has been suggested by

critics who wish to get rid of the supernatural. But the form which it

took teaches us how mercifully God is wont to mould His communications

according to our needs, and how wisely He shapes them, so as to find

entrance through even the lower wants. The commonest bodily needs may

become avenues for His truth, if our prayer accompanies our hunger.

The significance of the vision is plain to us, though Peter was 'much

perplexed' about it. In the light of the event, we understand that the

'great sheet let down from heaven by four corners,' and containing all

manner of creatures, is the symbol of universal humanity (to use modern

language). The four corners correspond to the four points of the

compass,--north, south, east, and west,--the contents to the swarming

millions of men. Peter would perceive no more in the command to 'kill

and eat' than the abrogation of Mosaic restrictions. Meditation was

needful to disclose the full extent of the revolution shadowed by the

vision and its accompanying words. The old nature of Peter was not so

completely changed but that a flash of it breaks out still. The same

self-confidence which had led him to 'rebuke' Jesus, and to say, 'This

shall not be unto Thee,' speaks in his unhesitating and irreverent 'Not

so, Lord!'

The naive reason he gives for not obeying--namely, his never having

done as he was now bid to do--is charmingly illogical and human. God

tells him to do a new thing, and his reason for not doing it is that it

is new. Use and wont are set up by us all against the fresh disclosures

of God's will. The command to kill and eat was not repeated. It was but

the introduction to the truth which was repeated thrice, the same

number of times as Peter had denied his Master and had received his

charge to feed His sheep.

That great truth has manifold applications, but its direct purpose as

regards Peter is to teach that all restrictions which differentiated

Jew from Gentile are abolished. 'Cleansing' does not here apply to

moral purifying, but to the admission of all mankind to the same

standing as the Jew. Therefore the Gospel is to be preached to all men,

and the Jewish Christian has no pre-eminence.

Peter's perplexity as to the meaning of the vision is very

intelligible. It was not so plain as to carry its own interpretation,

but, like most other of God's teachings, was explained by

circumstances. What was next done made the best commentary on what had

just been beheld. While patient reflection is necessary to do due

honour to God's teachings and to discover their bearing on events, it

is generally true that events unfold their significance as meditation

alone never can. Life is the best commentator on God's word. The three

men down at the door poured light on the vision on the housetop. But

the explanation was not left to circumstances. The Spirit directed

Peter to go with the messengers, and thus taught him the meaning of the

enigmatical words which he had heard from heaven.

It is to be remembered that the Apostle had no need of fresh

illumination as to the world-wide preaching of the Gospel. Christ's

commission to 'the uttermost parts of the earth' ever rang in his ears,

as we may be sure. But what he did need was the lesson that the

Gentiles could come into the Church without going through the gate of

Judaism. If all peculiar sanctity was gone from the Jew, and all men

shared in the 'cleansing,' there was no need for keeping up any of the

old restrictions, or insisting on Gentiles being first received into

the Israelitish community as a stage in their progress towards

Christianity.

It took Peter and the others years to digest the lesson given on the

housetop, but he began to put it in practice that day. How little he

knew the sweep of the truth then declared to him! How little we have

learned it yet! All exclusiveness which looks down on classes or races,

all monkish asceticism which taboos natural appetites and tastes, all

morbid scrupulosity which shuts out from religious men large fields of

life, all Pharisaism which says 'The temple of the Lord are we,' are

smitten to dust by the great words which gather all men into the same

ample, impartial divine love, and, in another aspect, give Christian

culture and life the charter of freest use of all God's fair world, and

place the distinction between clean and unclean in the spirit of the

user rather than in the thing used. 'Unto the pure all things are pure:

but unto them that are defiled... is nothing pure.'

'GOD IS NO RESPECTER OF PERSONS'

'And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and

at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before

me in bright clothing, 31. And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard,

and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32. Send

therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he

is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea-side: who, when

he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 83. Immediately therefore I sent to

thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we

all here present before God, to hear all things that art commanded thee

of God. 34. Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I

perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35. But in every nation

he that feareth Him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Him.

35. The word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching

peace by Jesus Christ: (He is Lord of all:) 37. That word, I say, ye

know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from

Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; 38. How God anointed

Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about

doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God

was with Him. 39. And we are witnesses of all things which He did both

in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on

a tree: 40. Him God raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41.

Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to

us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42. And

He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He

which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. 43. To Him

give all the prophets witness, that through His Name whosoever

believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins. 44. While Peter yet

spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the

word.'--ACTS x. 30-44.

This passage falls into three parts: Cornelius's explanation, Peter's

sermon, and the descent of the Spirit on the new converts. The last is

the most important, and yet is told most briefly. We may surely

recognise the influence of Peter's personal reminiscences in the scale

of the narrative, and may remember that Luke and Mark were thrown

together in later days.

I. Cornelius repeats what his messengers had already told Peter, but in

fuller detail. He tells how he was occupied when the angel appeared. He

was keeping the Jewish hour of prayer, and the fact that the vision

came to him as he prayed had attested to him its heavenly origin. If we

would see angels, the most likely place to behold them is in the secret

place of prayer. He tells, too, that the command to send for Peter was

a consequence of God's remembrance of his prayer ('therefore,' verse

32). His prayers and alms showed that he was 'of the light,' and

therefore he was directed to what would yield further light.

The command to send for Peter is noteworthy in two respects. It was,

first, a test of humility and obedience. Cornelius, as a Roman officer,

would be tempted to feel the usual contempt for one of the subject

race, and, unless his eagerness to know more of God's will overbore his

pride, to kick at the idea of sending to beg the favour of the presence

and instruction of a Jew, and of one, too, who could find no better

quarters than a tanner's house. The angel's voice commanded, but it did

not compel. Cornelius bore the test, and neither waived aside the

vision as a hallucination to which it was absurd for a practical man to

attend, nor recoiled from the lowliness of the proposed teacher. He

pocketed official and racial loftiness, and, as he emphasises,

'forthwith' despatched his message. It was as if an English official in

the Punjab had been sent to a Sikh 'Guru' for teaching.

The other remarkable point about the command is that Philip was

probably in Caesarea at the time. Why should Peter have been brought,

then, by two visions and two long journeys? The subsequent history

explains why. For the storm of criticism in the Jerusalem church

provoked by Cornelius's baptism would have raged with tenfold fury if

so revolutionary an act had been done by any less authoritative person

than the leader of the Apostles. The Lord would stamp His own approval

on the deed which marked so great an expansion of the Church, and

therefore He makes the first of the Apostles His agent, and that by a

double vision.

'Thou hast well done that thou art come,'--a courteous welcome, with

just a trace of the doubt which had occupied Cornelius during the 'four

days,' whether this unknown Jew would obey so strange an invitation.

Courtesy and preparedness to receive the unknown message beautifully

blend in Cornelius's closing words, which do not directly ask Peter to

speak, but declare the auditors' eagerness to hear, as well as their

confidence that what he says will be God's voice.

A variant reading in verse 33 gives 'in thy sight' for 'in the sight of

God,' and has much to recommend it. But in any case we have here the

right attitude for us all in the presence of the uttered will and mind

of God. Where such open-eared and open-hearted preparedness marks the

listeners, feebler teachers than Peter will win converts. The reason

why much earnest Christian teaching is vain is the indifference and

non-expectant attitude of the hearers, who are not hearkeners. Seed

thrown on the wayside is picked up by the birds.

II. Peter's sermon is, on the whole, much like his other addresses

which are abundantly reported in the early part of the Acts. The great

business of the preachers then was to tell the history of Jesus.

Christianity is, first, a recital of historical events, from which, no

doubt, principles are deduced, and which necessarily lead on to

doctrines; but the facts are first.

But the familiar story is told to Cornelius with some variation of

tone. And it is prefaced by a great word, which crystallises the large

truth that had sprung into consciousness and startling power in Peter,

as the result of his own and Cornelius's experience. He had not

previously thought of God as 'a respecter of persons,' but the

conviction that He was not had never blazed with such sun-clearness

before him as it did now. Jewish narrowness had, unconsciously to

himself, somewhat clouded it; but these four days had burned in on him,

as if it were a new truth, that 'in every nation' there may be men

accepted of God, because they 'fear Him and work righteousness.'

That great saying is twisted from its right meaning when it is

interpreted as discouraging the efforts of Christians to carry the

Gospel to the heathen; for, if the 'light of nature' is sufficient,

what was Peter sent to Caesarea for? But it is no less maltreated when

evangelical Christians fail to grasp its world-wide significance, or

doubt that in lands where Christ's name has not been proclaimed there

are souls groping for the light, and seeking to obey the law written on

their hearts. That there are such, and that such are 'accepted of Him,'

and led by His own ways to the fuller light, is obviously taught in

these words, and should be a welcome thought to us all.

The tangled utterances which immediately follow, sound as if speech

staggered under the weight of the thoughts opening before the speaker.

Whatever difficulty attends the construction, the intention is

clear,--to contrast the limited scope of the message, as confined to

the children of Israel, with its universal destination as now made

clear. The statement which in the Authorised and Revised Versions is

thrown into a parenthesis is really the very centre of the Apostle's

thought. Jesus, who has hitherto been preached to Israel, is 'Lord of

all,' and the message concerning Him is now to be proclaimed, not in

vague outline and at second hand, as it had hitherto reached Cornelius,

but in full detail, and as a message in which he was concerned.

Contrast the beginning and the ending of the discourse,--'the word sent

unto the children of Israel' and 'every one that believeth on Him shall

receive remission of sins.' A remarkable variation in the text is

suggested by Blass in his striking commentary, who would omit 'Lord'

and read, 'The word which He sent to the children of Israel, bringing

the good tidings of peace through Jesus Christ,--this [word] belongs to

all.' That reading does away with the chief difficulties, and brings

out clearly the thought which is more obscurely expressed in a

contorted sentence by the present reading.

The subsequent _resume_ of the life of Jesus is substantially the same

as is found in Peter's other sermons. But we may note that the highest

conceptions of our Lord's nature are not stated. It is hard to suppose

that Peter after Pentecost had not the same conviction as burned in his

confession, 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.' But in

these early discourses neither the Divinity and Incarnation nor the

atoning sacrifice of Jesus is set forth. He is the Christ, 'anointed

with the Holy Ghost and with power.' God is with Him (Nicodemus had got

as far as that). He is 'ordained of God to be the judge of quick and

dead.'

We note, too, that His teaching is not touched upon, nor any of the

profounder aspects of His work as the Revealer of God, but His

beneficence and miraculous deliverances of devil-ridden men. His death

is declared, but without any of the accusations of His murderers,

which, like lance-thrusts, 'pricked' Jewish hearers. Nor is the

efficacy of that death as the sacrifice for the world's sin touched

upon, but it is simply told as a fact, and set in contrast with the

Resurrection. These were the plain facts which had first to be accepted.

The only way of establishing facts is by evidence of eye-witnesses. So

Peter twice (verses 39, 41) adduces his own and his colleagues'

evidence. But the facts are not yet a gospel, unless they are further

explained as well as established. Did such things happen? The answer

is, 'We saw them.' What did they mean? The answer begins by adducing

the 'witness' of the Apostles to a different order of truths, which

requires a different sort of witness. Jesus had bidden them 'testify'

that He is to be Judge of living and dead; that is, of all mankind.

Their witness to that can only rest on His word.

Nor is that all. There is yet another body of 'witnesses' to yet

another class of truths. 'All the prophets' bear witness to the great

truth which makes the biography of the Man the gospel for all

men,--that the deepest want of all men is satisfied through the name

which Peter ever rang out as all-powerful to heal and bless. The

forgiveness of sins through the manifested character and work of Jesus

Christ is given on condition of faith to any and every one who

believes, be he Jew or Gentile, Galilean fisherman or Roman centurion.

Cornelius may have known little of the prophets, but he knew the burden

of sin. He did not know all that we know of Jesus, and of the way in

which forgiveness is connected with His work, but he did know now that

it was connected, and that this Jesus was risen from the dead, and was

to be the Judge. His faith went out to that Saviour, and as he heard he

believed.

III. Therefore the great gift, attesting the divine acceptance of him

and the rest of the hearers, came at once. There had been no confession

of their faith, much less had there been baptism, or laying on of

Apostolic hands. The sole qualification and condition for the reception

of the Spirit which John lays down in his Gospel when he speaks of the

'Spirit, which they that believe on Him should receive,' was present

here, and it was enough. Peter and his brethren might have hesitated

about baptizing an uncircumcised believer. The Lord of the Church

showed Peter that He did not hesitate.

So, like a true disciple, Peter followed Christ's lead, and though

'they of the circumcision' were struck with amazement, he said to

himself, 'Who am I, that I should withstand God?' and opened his heart

to welcome these new converts as possessors of 'like precious faith' as

was demonstrated by their possession of the same Spirit. Would that

Peter's willingness to recognise all who manifest the Spirit of Christ,

whatever their relation to ecclesiastical regulations, had continued

the law and practice of the Church!

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 135 / 317 题