I. An instance of a wholly unreal, because inoperative, faith.

'He believed,' says the narrative, and believing was baptized. It is

worth noting, in passing, how the profession of faith without anything

more was considered by the Early Church sufficient. But obviously his

was no true faith. The event showed that it was not.

What was it which made his faith thus unreal?

It rested wholly on the miracles and signs; he 'wondered' when he saw

them. Of course, miracles were meant to lead to faith; but if they did

not lead on to a deeper sense of one's own evil and need, and so to a

spiritual apprehension, then they were of no use.

The very beginning of the story points to the one bond that unites to

God, as being the sense of need and the acceptance with heart and will

of the testimony of Jesus Christ. Such a disposition is shown in the

Samaritans, who make a contrast with Simon in that they believed Philip

_preaching_, while Simon believed him _working miracles_. The true

place of miracles is to attract attention, to prepare to listen to the

word. They are only introductory. A faith may be founded on them, but,

on the other hand, the impressions which they produce may be

evanescent. How subordinate then, their place at the most! And the one

thing which avails is a living contact of heart and soul with Jesus

Christ.

Again, Simon's belief was purely an affair of the understanding. We are

not to suppose, I think, that he merely believed in Philip as a

miracle-worker; he must have had some notion about Philip's Master, and

we know that it was belief in Jesus as the Christ that qualified in the

Apostolic age for baptism. So it is reasonable to suppose that he had

so much of head knowledge. But it was only head knowledge. There was in

it no penitence, no self-abandonment, no fruit in holy desires; or in

other words, there was no heart. It was credence, but not trust.

Now it does not matter how much or how little you know about Jesus

Christ. It does not matter how you have come to that knowledge. It does

not matter though you have received Christian ordinances as Simon had.

If your faith is not a living power, leading to love and

self-surrender, it is really nought. And here, on its earliest conflict

with heathen magic, the gospel proclaims by the mouth of the Apostle

what is true as to all formalists and nominal Christians: 'Thou hast

neither part nor lot in this matter, _for_ thy heart is not right.' One

thing only unites to God--a faith which cleanses the heart, a faith

which lays hold on Christ with will and conscience, a faith which,

resting on penitent acknowledgment of sin, trusts wholly to His great

mercy.

II. An instance of the constant tendency to corrupt Christianity with

heathen superstition.

The Apostles' bestowal of the Holy Ghost, which was evidently

accompanied by visible signs, had excited Simon's desire for so useful

an aid to his conjuring, and he offers to buy the power, judging of

them by himself, and betraying that what he was ready to buy he was

also intending to sell.

The offer to buy has been taken as his great sin. Surely it was but the

outcome of a greater. It was not only what he offered, but what he

desired, that was wrong. He wanted that on 'whomsoever I lay hands, he

may receive the Holy Ghost.' That preposterous wish was quite as bad

as, and was the root of, his absurd offer to bribe Peter. Bribe Peter,

indeed! Some of Peter's successors would have been amenable to such

considerations, but not the horny-handed fisherman who had once said,

'Silver and gold have I none.'

Peter's answer, especially the words of my text, puts the Christian

principle in sharp antagonism to the heathen one.

Simon regards what is sacred and spiritual purely as part of his

stock-in-trade, contributing to his prestige. He offers to buy it. And

the foundation of all his errors is that he regards spiritual gifts as

capable of being received and exercised apart altogether from moral

qualifications. He does not think at all of what is involved in the

very name, 'the Holy Ghost.'

Now, on the other hand, Peter's answer lays down broadly and sharply

the opposite truth, the Christian principle that a heart right in the

sight of God is the indispensable qualification for all possession of

spiritual power, or of any of the blessings which Jesus gives.

How the heart is made right, and what constitutes righteousness is

another matter. That leads to the doctrine of repentance and faith.

The one thing that makes such participation impossible is being and

continuing in 'the gall of bitterness, and the bond of iniquity.' Or,

to put it into more modern words, all the blessings of the Gospel are a

gift of God, and are bestowed only on moral conditions. Faith which

leads to love and personal submission to the will of God makes a man a

Christian. Therefore, outward ordinances are only of use as they help a

man to that personal act.

Therefore, no other man or body of men can do it for us, or come

between us and God.

And in confirmation, notice how Peter here speaks of forgiveness. His

words do not sound as if he thought that he held the power of

absolution, but he tells Simon to go to God who alone can forgive, and

refers Simon's fate to God's mercy.

These tendencies, which Simon expresses so baldly, are in us all, and

are continually reappearing. How far much of what calls itself

Christianity has drifted from Peter's principle laid down here, that

moral and spiritual qualifications are the only ones which avail for

securing 'part or lot in the matter' of Christ's gifts received for,

and bestowed on, men! How much which really rests on the opposite

principle, that these gifts can be imparted by men who are supposed to

possess them, apart altogether from the state of heart of the would-be

recipient, we see around us to-day! _Simony_ is said to be the securing

ecclesiastical promotion by purchase. But it is much rather the belief

that 'the gift of God can be purchased with' anything but personal

faith in Jesus, the Giver and the Gift. The effects of it are patent

among us. Ceremonies usurp the place of faith. A priesthood is exalted.

The universal Christian prerogative of individual access to God is

obscured. Christianity is turned into a kind of magic.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 121 / 317 题