OBEDIENT DISOBEDIENCE

'But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in

the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. 20.

For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. 21. So

when they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding

nothing how they might punish them, because of the people: for all men

glorified God for that which was done. 22. For the man was above forty

years old, on whom this miracle of healing was shewed. 23. And being

let go they went to their own company, and reported all that the chief

priests and elders had said unto them. 24. And when they heard that,

they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, Thou

art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that

in them is: 25. Who by the mouth of Thy servant David hast said, Why

did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things? 26. The kings

of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against

the Lord, and against His Christ. 27. For of a truth against Thy holy

child Jesus, whom Thou hast anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate,

with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,

28. For to do whatsoever Thy hand and Thy counsel determined before to

be done. 29. And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto

Thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak Thy word, 30. By

stretching forth Thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be

done by the name of Thy holy child Jesus. 31. And when they had prayed,

the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were

all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with

boldness.'--ACTS iv. 19-31.

The only chance for persecution to succeed is to smite hard and

swiftly. If you cannot strike, do not threaten. Menacing words only

give courage. The rulers betrayed their hesitation when the end of

their solemn conclave was but to 'straitly threaten'; and less heroic

confessors than Peter and John would have disregarded the prohibition

as mere wind. None the less the attitude of these two Galilean

fishermen is noble and singular, when their previous cowardice is

remembered. This first collision with civil authority gives, as has

been already noticed, the main lines on which the relations of the

Church to hostile powers have proceeded.

I. The heroic refusal of unlawful obedience. We shall probably not do

injustice to John if we suppose that Peter was spokesman. If so, the

contrast of the tone of his answer with all previously recorded

utterances of his is remarkable. Warm-hearted impulsiveness, often

wrong-headed and sometimes illogical, had been their mark; but here we

have calm, fixed determination, which, as is usually its manner, wastes

no words, but in its very brevity impresses the hearers as being

immovable. Whence did this man get the power to lay down once for all

the foundation principles of the limits of civil obedience, and of the

duty of Christian confession? His words take rank with the

ever-memorable sayings of thinkers and heroes, from Socrates in his

prison telling the Athenians that he loved them, but that he must 'obey

God rather than you,' to Luther at Worms with his 'It is neither safe

nor right to do anything against conscience. Here I stand; I can do

nothing else. God help me! Amen.' Peter's words are the first of a long

series.

This first instance of persecution is made the occasion for the clear

expression of the great principles which are to guide the Church. The

answer falls into two parts, in the first of which the limits of

obedience to civil authority are laid down in a perfectly general form

to which even the Council are expected to assent, and in the second an

irresistible compulsion to speak is boldly alleged as driving the two

Apostles to a flat refusal to obey.

It was a daring stroke to appeal to the Council for an endorsement of

the principle in verse 19, but the appeal was unanswerable; for this

tribunal had no other ostensible reason for existence than to enforce

obedience to the law of God, and to Peter's dilemma only one reply was

possible. But it rested on a bold assumption, which was calculated to

irritate the court; namely, that there was a blank contradiction

between their commands and God's, so that to obey the one was to

disobey the other. When that parting of the ways is reached, there

remains no doubt as to which road a religious man must take.

The limits of civil obedience are clearly drawn. It is a duty, because

'the powers that be are ordained of God,' and obedience to them is

obedience to Him. But if they, transcending their sphere, claim

obedience which can only be rendered by disobedience to Him who has

appointed them, then they are no longer His ministers, and the duty of

allegiance falls away. But there must be a plain conflict of commands,

and we must take care lest we substitute whims and fancies of our own

for the injunctions of God. Peter was not guided by his own conceptions

of duty, but by the distinct precept of his Master, which had bid him

speak. It is not true that it is the cause which makes the martyr, but

it is true that many good men have made themselves martyrs needlessly.

This principle is too sharp a weapon to be causelessly drawn and

brandished. Only an unmistakable opposition of commandments warrants

its use; and then, he has little right to be called Christ's soldier

who keeps the sword in the scabbard.

The articulate refusal in verse 20 bases itself on the ground of

irrepressible necessity: 'We cannot but speak.' The immediate

application was to the facts of Christ's life, death, and glory. The

Apostles could not help speaking of these, both because to do so was

their commission, and because the knowledge of them and of their

importance forbade silence. The truth implied is of wide reach. Whoever

has a real, personal experience of Christ's saving power, and has heard

and seen Him, will be irresistibly impelled to impart what he has

received. Speech is a relief to a full heart. The word, concealed in

the prophet's heart, burned there 'like fire in his bones, and he was

weary of forbearing.' So it always is with deep conviction. If a man

has never felt that he must speak of Christ, he is a very imperfect

Christian. The glow of his own heart, the pity for men who know Him

not, his Lord's command, all concur to compel speech. The full river

cannot be dammed up.

II. The lame and impotent conclusion of the perplexed Council. How

plain the path is when only duty is taken as a guide, and how

vigorously and decisively a man marches along it! Peter had no

hesitation, and his resolved answer comes crashing in a straight

course, like a cannon-ball. The Council had a much more ambiguous

oracle to consult in order to settle their course, and they hesitate

accordingly, and at last do a something which is a nothing. They wanted

to trim their sails to catch popular favour, and so they could not do

anything thoroughly. To punish or acquit was the only alternative for

just judges. But they were not just; and as Jesus had been crucified,

not because Pilate thought Him guilty, but to please the people, so His

Apostles were let off, not because they were innocent, but for the same

reason. When popularity-hunters get on the judicial bench, society must

be rotten, and nearing its dissolution. To 'decree unrighteousness by a

law' is among the most hideous of crimes. Judges 'willing to wound, and

yet afraid to strike,' are portents indicative of corruption. We may

remark here how the physician's pen takes note of the patient's age, as

making his cure more striking, and manifestly miraculous.

III. The Church's answer to the first assault of the world's power. How

beautifully natural that is, 'Being let go, they went to their own,'

and how large a principle is expressed in the naive words! The great

law of association according to spiritual affinity has much to do in

determining relations here. It aggregates men, according to sorts; but

its operation is thwarted by other conditions, so that companionship is

often misery. But a time comes when it will work unhindered, and men

will be united with their like, as the stones on some sea-beaches are

laid in rows, according to their size, by the force of the sea. Judas

'went to his own place,' and, in another world, like will draw to like,

and prevailing tendencies will be increased by association with those

who share them.

The prayer of the Church was probably the inspired outpouring of one

voice, and all the people said 'Amen,' and so made it theirs. Whose

voice it was which thus put into words the common sentiment we should

gladly have known, but need not speculate. The great fact is that the

Church answered threats by prayer. It augurs healthy spiritual life

when opposition and danger neither make cheeks blanch with fear nor

flush with anger. No man there trembled nor thought of vengeance, or of

repaying threats with threats. Every man there instinctively turned

heavenwards, and flung himself, as it were, into God's arms for

protection. Prayer is the strongest weapon that a persecuted Church can

use. Browning makes a tyrant say, recounting how he had tried to crush

a man, that his intended victim

'Stood erect, caught at God's skirts, and prayed,

So _I_ was afraid.'

The contents of the prayer are equally noteworthy. Instead of minutely

studying it verse by verse, we may note some of its salient points.

Observe its undaunted courage. That company never quivered or wavered.

They had no thought of obeying the mandate of the Council. They were a

little army of heroes. What had made them so? What but the conviction

that they had a living Lord at God's right hand, and a mighty Spirit in

their spirits? The world has never seen a transformation like that.

Unique effects demand unique causes for their explanation, and nothing

but the historical truth of the facts recorded in the last pages of the

Gospels and first of the Acts accounts for the demeanour of these men.

Their courage is strikingly marked by their petition. All they ask is

'boldness' to speak a word which shall not be theirs, but God's. Fear

would have prayed for protection; passion would have asked retribution

on enemies. Christian courage and devotion only ask that they may not

shrink from their duty, and that the word may be spoken, whatever

becomes of the speakers. The world is powerless against men like that.

Would the Church of to-day meet threats with like unanimity of desire

for boldness in confession? If not, it must be because it has not the

same firm hold of the Risen Lord which these first believers had. The

truest courage is that which is conscious of its weakness, and yet has

no thought of flight, but prays for its own increase.

We may observe, too, the body of belief expressed in the prayer. First

it lays hold on the creative omnipotence of God, and thence passes to

the recognition of His written revelation. The Church has begun to

learn the inmost meaning of the Old Testament, and to find Christ

there. David may not have written the second Psalm. Its attribution to

him by the Church stands on a different level from Christ's attribution

of authorship, as, for instance, of the hundred and tenth Psalm. The

prophecy of the Psalm is plainly Messianic, however it may have had a

historical occasion in some forgotten revolt against some Davidic king;

and, while the particular incidents to which the prayer alludes do not

exhaust its far-reaching application, they are rightly regarded as

partly fulfilling it. Herod is a 'king of the earth,' Pilate is a

'ruler'; Roman soldiers are Gentiles; Jewish rulers are the

representatives of 'the people.' Jesus is 'God's Anointed.' The fact

that such an unnatural and daring combination of rebels was predicted

in the Psalm bears witness that even that crime at Calvary was

foreordained to come to pass, and that God's hand and counsel ruled.

Therefore all other opposition, such as now threatened, will turn out

to be swayed by that same Mighty Hand, to work out His counsel. Why,

then, should the Church fear? If we can see God's hand moving all

things, terror is dead for us, and threats are like the whistling of

idle wind.

Mark, too, the strong expression of the Church's dependence on God.

'Lord' here is an unusual word, and means 'Master,' while the Church

collectively is called 'Thy servants,' or properly, 'slaves.' It is a

different word from that of 'servant' (rather than 'child') applied to

Jesus in verses 27 and 30. God is the Master, we are His 'slaves,'

bound to absolute obedience, unconditional submission, belonging to

Him, not to ourselves, and therefore having claims on Him for such care

as an owner gives to his slaves or his cattle. He will not let them be

maltreated nor starved. He will defend them and feed them; but they

must serve him by life, and death if need be. Unquestioning submission

and unreserved dependence are our duties. Absolute ownership and

unshared responsibility for our well-being belong to Him.

Further, the view of Christ's relationship to God is the same as occurs

in other of the early chapters of the Acts. The title of 'Thy holy

Servant Jesus' dwells on Christ's office, rather than on His nature.

Here it puts Him in contrast with David, also called 'Thy servant.' The

latter was imperfectly what Jesus was perfectly. His complete

realisation of the prophetic picture of the Servant of the Lord in

Isaiah is emphasised by the adjective 'holy,' implying complete

devotion or separation to the service of God, and unsullied, unlimited

moral purity. The uniqueness of His relation in this aspect is

expressed by the definite article in the original. He is _the_ Servant,

in a sense and measure all His own. He is further _the_ Anointed

Messiah. This was the Church's message to Israel and the stay of its

own courage, that Jesus was the Christ, the Anointed and perfect

Servant of the Lord, who was now in heaven, reigning there. All that

this faith involved had not yet become clear to their consciousness,

but the Spirit was guiding them step by step into all the truth; and

what they saw and heard, not only in the historical facts of which they

were the witnesses, but in the teaching of that Spirit, they could not

but speak.

The answer came swift as the roll of thunder after lightning. They who

ask for courage to do God's will and speak Christ's name have never

long to wait for response. The place 'was shaken,' symbol of the effect

of faithful witness-bearing, or manifestation of the power which was

given in answer to their prayer. 'They were all filled with the Holy

Ghost,' who now did not, as before, confer ability to speak with other

tongues, but wrought no less worthily in heartening and fitting them to

speak 'in their own tongue, wherein they were born,' in bold defiance

of unlawful commands.

The statement of the answer repeats the petition verbatim: 'With all

boldness they spake the word.' What we desire of spiritual gifts we

get, and God moulds His replies so as to remind us of our petitions,

and to show by the event that these have reached His ear and guided His

giving hand.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 89 / 317 题