II. The paradox of Death's seeming conquest over the Lord of Life.

The word rendered 'Prince' means an originator, and hence a leader and

hence a lord. Whether Peter had yet reached a conception of the

divinity of Jesus or not, he had clearly reached a much higher one of

Him than he had attained before His death. In some sense he was

beginning to recognise that His relation to 'life' was loftier and more

mysterious than that of other men. Was it His death only that thus

elevated the disciples' thoughts of Jesus? Strange that if He died and

there an end, such a result should have followed. One would have

expected His death to have shattered their faith in Him, but somehow it

strengthened their faith. Why did they not all continue to lament, as

did the two of them on the road to Emmaus: 'We trusted that this had

been He who should have redeemed Israel'--but now we trust no more, and

our dreams are buried in His grave? Why did they not go back to Galilee

and their nets? What raised their spirits, their courage, and increased

their understanding of Him, and their faith in Him? How came His death

to be the occasion of consolidating, not of shattering, their

fellowship? How came Peter to be so sure that a man who had died was

the 'Prince of Life'? The answer, the only one psychologically

possible, is in what Peter here proclaims to unwilling ears, 'Whom God

raised from the dead.'

The fact of the Resurrection sets the fact of the Death in another

light. Meditating on these twin facts, the Death and Resurrection of

Jesus, we hear Himself speaking as He did to John in Patmos: 'I am the

Living One who became dead, and lo, I am alive for evermore!'

If we try to listen with the ears of these first hearers of Peter's

words, we shall better appreciate his daring paradox. Think of the

tremendous audacity of the claim which they make, that Jesus should be

the 'Prince of Life,' and of the strange contradiction to it which the

fact that they 'killed' Him seems to give. How could death have power

over the Prince of Life? That sounds as if, indeed, the 'sun were

turned into darkness,' or as if fire became ice. That brief clause 'ye

killed the Prince of Life' must have seemed sheer absurdity to the

hearers whose hands were still red with the blood of Jesus.

But there is another paradox here. It was strange that death should be

able to invade that Life, but it is no less strange that men should be

able to inflict it. But we must not forget that Jesus died, not because

men slew Him, but because He willed to die. The whole of the narratives

of the Crucifixion in the Gospels avoid using the word 'death.' Such

expressions as He 'gave up the ghost,' or the like, are used, implying

what is elsewhere distinctly asserted, that His death was His offering

of Himself, the result of His own volition, not of exhaustion or of

torture. Thus, even in dying, He showed Himself the Lord of Life and

the Master of Death. Men indeed fastened Jesus to the Cross, but He

died, not because He was so fastened, but because He willed to 'make

His soul an offering for sin.' Bound as it were to a rock in the midst

of the ocean, He, of His own will, and at His own time, bowed His head,

and let the waves of the sea of death roll over it.

III. The triumphant divine paradox of life given and death conquered

through a death.

Jesus is 'Prince' in the sense of being source of life to mankind, just

because He died. Hie death is the death of Death. His apparent defeat

is His real victory.

By His death He takes away our sins.

By His death He abolishes death.

The physical fact remains, but all else which makes the 'sting of

death' to men is gone. It is no more a solitude, for He has died, and

thereby He becomes a companion in that hour to every lover of His. Its

darkness changes into light to those who, by 'following Him,' have,

even there, 'the light of life.' This Samson carried away the gates of

the prison on His own strong shoulders when He came forth from it. It

is His to say, 'O death! I will be thy plague.'

By His death He diffuses life.

'The Spirit was not given' till Jesus was 'glorified,' which

glorification is John's profound synonym for His crucifixion. When the

alabaster box of His pure body was broken, the whole house of humanity

was filled with the odour of the ointment.

So the great paradox becomes a blessed truth, that man's deepest sin

works out God's highest act of Love and Pardon.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 79 / 317 题