I. First, then, the Witnesses.

Here we have the 'head of the Apostolic College,' the 'primate' of the

Twelve, on whose supposed primacy--which is certainly not a

'rock'--such tremendous claims have been built, laying down the

qualifications and the functions of an Apostle. How simply they present

themselves to his mind! The qualification is only personal knowledge of

Jesus Christ in His earthly history, because the function is only to

attest His Resurrection. Their work was to bear witness to what they

had seen with their eyes; and what was needed, therefore, was nothing

more than such familiarity with Christ as should make them competent

witnesses to the fact that He died, and to the fact that the same Jesus

who had died, and whom they knew so well, rose again and went up to

heaven.

The same conception of an Apostle's work lies in Christ's last solemn

designation of them for their office, where their whole commission is

included in the simple words, 'Ye shall be witnesses unto Me.' It

appears again and again in the earlier addresses reported in this book.

'This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.' 'Whom

God hath raised from the dead, whereof we are witnesses.' 'With great

power gave the Apostles witness of the Resurrection.' 'We are His

witnesses of these things.' To Cornelius, Peter speaks of the Apostles

as 'witnesses chosen before of God, who did eat and drink with Him

after He rose from the dead'--and whose charge, received from Christ,

was 'to testify that it is He which was ordained of God to be the Judge

of quick and dead.' Paul at Antioch speaks of the Twelve, from whom he

distinguishes himself, as being 'Christ's witnesses to _the

people_'--and seems to regard them as specially commissioned to the

Jewish nation, while he was sent to 'declare unto you'--Gentiles--the

same 'glad tidings,' in that 'God had raised up Jesus again.' So we

might go on accumulating passages, but these will suffice.

I need not spend time in elaborating or emphasising the contrast which

the idea of the Apostolic office contained in these simple words

presents to the portentous theories of later times. I need only remind

you that, according to the Gospels, the work of the Apostles in

Christ's lifetime embraced three elements, none of which were peculiar

to them--to be with Christ, to preach, and to work miracles; that their

characteristic work after His Ascension was this of witness-bearing;

that the Church did not owe to them as a body its extension, nor

Christian doctrine its form; that whilst Peter and James and John

appear in the history, and Matthew perhaps wrote a Gospel, and the

other James and Jude are probably the authors of the brief Epistles

which bear their names--the rest of the Twelve never appear in the

subsequent history. The Acts of the Apostles is a misnomer for Luke's

second 'treatise.' It tells the work of Peter alone among the Twelve.

The Hellenists Stephen and Philip, the Cypriote Barnabas, and the man

of Tarsus--greater than them all--these spread the name of Christ

beyond the limits of the Holy City and the chosen people. The solemn

power of 'binding and loosing' was not a prerogative of the Twelve, for

we read that Jesus came where 'the _disciples_ were assembled,' and

that 'the _disciples_ were glad when they saw the Lord'; and 'He

breathed on _them_, and said, "Receive ye the Holy Ghost: whose soever

sins ye remit, they are remitted."'

Where in all this is there a trace of the special Apostolic powers

which have been alleged to be transmitted from them? Nowhere. Who was

it that came and said, 'Brother Saul, the Lord hath sent me that thou

mightest be filled with the Holy Ghost'? A simple 'layman'! Who was it

that stood by, a passive and astonished spectator of the communication

of spiritual gifts to Gentile converts, and could only say, 'Forasmuch,

then, as God gave them the like gift, as He did unto us, what was I

that I could withstand God?' Peter, the leader of the Twelve!

Their task was apparently a humbler, really a far more important one.

Their place was apparently a lowlier, really a loftier one. They had to

lay broad and deep the basis for all the growth and grace of the

Church, in the facts which they witnessed. Their work abides; and when

the Celestial City is revealed to our longing hearts, in its

foundations will be read 'the names of the twelve Apostles of the

Lamb.' Their office was testimony; and their testimony was to this

effect--'Hearken, we eleven men knew this Jesus. Some of us knew Him

when He was a boy, and lived beside that little village where He was

brought up. We were with Him for three whole years in close contact day

and night. We all of us, though we were cowards, stood afar off with a

handful of women when He was crucified. We saw Him dead. We saw His

grave. We saw Him living, and we touched Him, and handled Him, and He

ate and drank with us; and we, sinners that we are that tell it you, we

went out with Him to the top of Olivet, and we saw Him go up into the

skies. Do you believe us or do you not? We do not come in the first

place to preach doctrines. We are not thinkers or moralists. We are

plain men, telling a plain story, to the truth of which we pledge our

senses. We do not want compliments about our spiritual elevation, or

our pure morality. We do not want reverence as possessors of mysterious

and exclusive powers. We want you to believe us as honest men, relating

what we have seen. There are eleven of us, and there are five hundred

at our back, and we have all got the one simple story to tell. It is,

indeed, a gospel, a philosophy, a theology, the reconciliation of earth

and heaven, the revelation of God to man, and of man to himself, the

unveiling of the future world, the basis of hope; but we bring it to

you first as a thing that happened upon this earth of ours, which we

saw with our eyes, and of which we are the witnesses.'

To that work there can be no successors. Some of the Apostles were

inspired to be the writers of the authoritative fountains of religious

truth; but that gift did not belong to them all, and was not the

distinctive possession of the Twelve. The power of working miracles,

and of communicating supernatural gifts, was not confined to them, but

is found exercised by other believers, as well as by a whole

'presbytery.' And as for what was properly their task, and their

qualifications, there can be no succession, for there is nothing to

succeed to, but what cannot be transmitted--the sight of the risen

Saviour, and the witness to His Resurrection as a fact certified by

their senses.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 66 / 317 题