[Sidenote: [624 A.D.]]
In order to rescue a large caravan from danger and distress, the Koreish
marched into the field a thousand strong, with seven hundred camels and
one hundred horses. The train of merchandise escaped the ambush by the
clever management of Abu Sufyan, but nevertheless Abu Jahl persisted in
the conflict. At Bedr, a camping ground and market, noted even at the
present day for its plentiful supply of water, the Meccans encountered
the hostile bands, who were not half so strong, and made ready for
battle. Three Meccans, kinsmen of those who had fallen at Nakhla, came
forward and challenged three of the opposite party to single combat.
Hamza, Ali, and Obaida opposed themselves to them and slew them,
whereupon the fight became general. Mohammed, who was watching the
encounter from a leafy hut on a rising ground and praying to God with
great ardour and excitement that he would not allow his faithful few to
be destroyed, suddenly declared that victory had been promised him in a
vision, and flinging a handful of dust after the Koreish, he called out,
“Shame on their faces!”
Soon confusion seized the enemy and the battle ended with a complete
defeat of the Koreish. Seventy heads of distinguished houses were slain
during the battle or on the flight. Amongst the fallen were Otba and
Shaiba, and, above all Abu Jahl (called the enemy of God), Mohammed’s
bitterest opponent; amongst the prisoners were his uncle Abbas and
Abul-Aas, the husband of his eldest daughter Zainab. Both were ransomed
and returned to Mecca. Abbas probably henceforth served his nephew as
a spy and Abul-Aas had to send his wife back to her father. Two other
prisoners, Al-Nadr and Okba, who had belonged to Mohammed’s most eager
adversaries in Mecca, were executed. But the prophet, always inclined
to mildness, deplored the rash act when he heard the touching lament of
the former’s daughter, a lament which is still preserved to us. For the
rest, the battle of Bedr was of the greatest importance for the victory
of Islam, and in consequence all the combatants whose names were entered
in the lists henceforth formed the highest nobility of the Moslems. The
spoil and the ransoms were equally divided, but soon after a saying of
the _Koran_ commanded that in future the fifth part of all spoil should
go to the prophet, for himself, his kinsmen, for the poor, orphans, and
wanderers.
BATTLE OF OHOD (MARCH, 625 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [625 A.D.]]
The battle of Bedr was the first step of Islam to dominion. Whilst the
inhabitants of Medina and the Bedouin tribes of the neighbourhood drew
from the prophet’s success a belief in his divine mission and gathered
round him with enthusiasm, in Mecca there was great despair. Abu Lahab,
Mohammed’s uncle and enemy, died seven days later of a disease resembling
smallpox, full of affliction and anger at the success of his nephew; and
Okba’s daughter Hind, the passionate wife of Abu Sufyan, cried day and
night in ungoverned fury for revenge for her fallen kinsmen. Her lord
actually went against Medina with two hundred Koreish; but their belief
in their own cause was shaken, and when Mohammed marched against them
they fled home in such haste that they left their stock of meal behind.
In the months after this “meal-campaign,” certain Jews in Medina, having
made a mock of Mohammed in their verses, were put to death, and their
co-religionists who had refused to go over to Islam, in particular
the Beni Kainoka, the most skilful of the wealthy goldsmiths in the
country, were driven into banishment in Syria. Abu Sufyan now marched
a second time to the fight, on this occasion with a force of three
thousand Koreish, at whose head stood three brave men, Akrama a son of
Abu Jahl, Khalid, and Amru, afterwards the most distinguished heroes of
the faithful. In the rearguard was the terrible Hind, with fifteen other
women and certain poets who roused the spirit of vengeance in the army by
laments over those slain at Bedr.
Mohammed wished to await the enemy in the city, but the young men, in
their eagerness for war, demanded a pitched battle. The prophet yielded
to their demand with inward misgivings. On the mount Ohod, whose solitary
granite mass, bare of tree or bush, rises about a league to the north
of Medina, he ranged his warriors, who did not exceed seven hundred, as
he had disdained the help of the Jews and thus so deeply offended their
patron, the Khazrayite Abdallah ben Obayyah, who apart from this was a
secret envier and opponent of Mohammed, that he too had withdrawn with
his army. Mohammed himself fought in the front rank; wearing a red fillet
round his head and waving “the sword of God and his envoy,” he encouraged
his men with axioms of the new faith. Here, too, victory seemed first to
incline to the Moslems; strenuously as Hind and her women, “the daughters
of the stars, with cloudy hair and pearl-ornamented necks,” might
encourage the combatants, promising loving embraces to the victors, and
threatening the flying with shame and death, the ranks of the Meccans
nevertheless gave way. Seven members of the family of Abd ad-Dar, who
each in turn performed the hereditary office of standard-bearer, rolled
in the dust. Then the bowmen, fearing to be too late for the spoil,
left the secure position which Mohammed had assigned them behind the
mountain, and thus gave Khalid an opportunity to fall with his cavalry on
the Moslem rear. The battle now suddenly took a new turn; the superior
numbers of the Koreish carried the day, Mohammed was wounded and fell,
face downwards, into a trench. His standard-bearer Mussab, fell, and as
he resembled Mohammed in appearance the rumour, “Mohammed is dead,” was
quickly disseminated and proved as encouraging to the infidels as it
was destructive to the Moslem. The defeated were already hurrying away
towards Medina, when the poet Kaab, the son of Malik, recognised the
prophet amongst the wounded, in his helmet and coat of mail.
[Illustration: ARAB WARRIOR, TIME OF MOHAMMED]
Encouraged by the joyful tidings that Mohammed was still alive, ten or
twelve of his trusty followers, including Abu Bekr and Omar, collected
round him and carved themselves a way with the sword towards a rocky
height, where they defended themselves bravely until the enemy, who,
supposing the prophet to be dead, had paid no special heed to this little
band, had begun their homeward march after insulting and mutilating the
dead. Hind and her companions took the severed noses and ears of the
enemy, strung them together like pearls, and wore them as necklaces and
bracelets. The former even carried her rage so far that she tried to tear
the heart out of the corpse of Hamza whom the Abyssinian slave Washi had
slain in the midst of the fight, and to rend it in pieces.[31] The fall
of the faithful Hamza touched Mohammed nearly; he frequently bewailed
him, and the women of Medina raised a general lament over the fallen
hero, whose name was henceforth mentioned in every death-song.
[Sidenote: [625-627 A.D.]]
After the retreat of the Koreish, Mohammed returned with his men to
Medina. Hard as the blow had been it could not shake his belief and
confidence in a successful issue. Whilst he consoled the relatives of the
slain with the thought of the happy life hereafter, he prohibited the
customary mourning usages, the striking of the visage, the shaving of the
hair, the rending of the garments, only permitting weeping because “tears
give relief to the afflicted heart”; at the same time he took judicious
measures for defence, in case the Koreish, hearing that the prophet
was still alive, should come back. But they did not venture to expose
their weakened army to fresh dangers; they contented themselves with the
victory they had won, and hoped that in time they might get the better of
religious innovations if they preserved the sacred city with the Kaaba
from all pollution, slew all Moslems who fell into their hands, and all
the readers of the _Koran_ who should proclaim Islam to the inhabitants
of the hill country, and if they permitted no Mohammedan to enter the
Kaaba. For years the followers of the prophet might not take part in the
pilgrimage to Mecca, which in the sacred months the rest of the Arabs
made for the sake of prayer and festival joys. But the time drew slowly
near when in Mecca also the consideration of the old heathen gods was to
sink in the dust, and even the Koreish would bow the knee before the name
of him against whom they now nourished so deadly a hatred and whom they
now persecuted in so bloody a fashion.
EXPEDITION AGAINST THE JEWS (626 A.D.)
Mohammed, from the very character of his religion, could not let the
sword rust in its sheath so long as Islam had not attained supremacy.
Consequently he continued to lead his followers on warlike expeditions
against both Jew and heathen. The fact that he himself took part in all
the fights was a great spur to the spirit and courage of his troops; more
than once his life was in danger, but a higher power protected God’s
envoy; the sword fell from a hostile leader who waved it above his head.
Since the battle of Ohod most of the attacks had been directed against
the Jews, who showed themselves more and more hostile to the new
religion. They found a protector in Abdallah ben Obayyah, the chief
of the Khazraj, who, jealous of Mohammed’s growing power amongst his
followers, toiled against the prophet. The Beni Nadir were driven from
their strong castles, after their date palms had been cut down, in
defiance of the usages of Arabian warfare; and they owed their lives
solely to the powerful intercession of Abdallah, but were nevertheless
compelled to quit the Arabian country like the Beni Kainoka before them.
But the “hypocrites” continued to work against Mohammed’s power after
a victorious campaign against the powerful tribe of the Beni Mustalik;
Abdallah excited a quarrel between the “helpers” and the immigrant
believers, which was only adjusted by the skill and prompt decision of
the prophet. A saying of the Koran gave warning against hypocrites,
but this time also Abdallah escaped punishment. Even the evil reports
concerning Aisha’s virtue and marital fidelity, which he and others put
into circulation about that time because she was left behind on a night
march and entered the camp on the second day in the company of a man,
were overlooked. Mohammed, in accordance with a revelation, declared the
rumours to be slanders, punished the calumniators who, like the poet
Hassan, maintained her guilt, and cherished Aisha with fresh tenderness;
but Abdallah remained unpunished. Mohammed dreaded the revenge of the
Khazraj.
SIEGE OF MEDINA, EXTERMINATION OF THE JEWS (627-628 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [627-628 A.D.]]
Soon after the Koreish and other Arab tribes made alliance with the
Jewish Beni Koraiza against the Moslems, and marched on Medina with a
force of ten thousand men. Mohammed did not venture to meet the superior
strength of the enemy in the open field for fear lest he should be
overtaken by a fate such as he had suffered at Ohod. He had recourse to a
method of defence hitherto unknown in Arabia. He drew a trench round the
city. By means of this defence he kept off the enemy by small skirmishes
for a time, until by crafty negotiations he succeeded in sowing mistrust
and division among the allies. The consequence was that the Arabs, who
besides this had been disheartened by the wintry weather and cold showers
of rain, retreated after an ineffectual blockade of five weeks; thus
abandoning their Jewish allies to Mohammed’s vengeance. Besieged in their
strong castles the Beni Koraiza had to surrender at discretion. Thereupon
in spite of the intercession of their ancient allies the Aus, according
to the harsh decision of the chief Zaid ben Muadh, who had been selected
as arbitrator, all the men of the tribe, seven hundred in number, were
executed on the market-place of Medina, the women and children were led
into slavery, and their flocks, lands, and goods were divided among the
victors.
“God drove the keepers of the Scriptures (the Jews) from their strong
places and put fear in their hearts. One half of them has he slain, the
other taken prisoners; he has given you their lands, their dwellings,
their goods, for an inheritance. God is almighty.”
In these words a saying of the _Koran_ announced this horrible event, the
darkest deed of Mohammed’s life. Zaid died soon after the cruel sentence.
Irritated by the continual perfidy and the hostile temper of the Jews,
Mohammed had allowed himself to be drawn into a course in which the
messenger of God gave way to the passionate Arab, in which not the temper
of a prophet but the revenge of the passionate Arab and the cruelty of an
oriental despot were manifested, in which “earthly mire choked the sacred
flame of prophecy.” And in order finally to destroy the power of the Jews
in Medina and the neighbourhood, Mohammed in the following year (628)
marched with fourteen hundred believers against their chief fortress of
Khaibar.
“We pray to thee, oh Almighty! against the goods of these places and
all that they contain,” cried the prophet with a loud voice, when they
entered the territory of their strong citadels, “and we implore thee to
preserve us from the evil of these places and their inhabitants.”
Mohammed’s prayer was heard. By the bravery of the Moslems, especially of
Ali, to whom before the battle the prophet had given his own sword--“Ali,
the man who loves God and his envoy, the man who knows no fear and never
yet turned his back on the enemy”--the castles were broken into, their
treasures and goods carried off, the inhabitants, when they escaped the
sword, made tributary so that they had to hold their rich estates and
date plantations as hereditary tenants and pay the half of the produce to
the new owners. The Mohammedans were roused to these warlike enterprises
no less by the greed of spoil than by religious fanaticism. The Jewish
chief Kinana was stretched on the rack to make him betray hidden
treasures, and when he remained dumb he was beheaded. Mohammed himself
not only appropriated the fifth share of the spoil, but also landed
property, and he increased the number of his wives by two beautiful
Jewish prisoners, Safiya and Zainab. The first was converted to Islam and
became a tender wife to the prophet, who celebrated the bridal with her
in his tent; on the other hand the second, whose nearest relatives had
met their death in the battle, meditated a dark act of vengeance. She
placed a poisoned meal before Mohammed. It is true that he ate little
of it (in consequence of a miraculous warning, as the legend recounts),
but still it was enough to undermine his health for the remainder of his
life. Even in his dying hour he is reported to have said that he felt the
poison of Khaibar[32] in his veins.
MOHAMMED’S PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA (629 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [629 A.D.]]
Even before this war Mohammed had made a pilgrimage to Mecca with a
considerable following, to try whether under shelter of the sacred month
he could approach the Kaaba, acting under the just conviction that it
would be of great advantage to the spread of his doctrines if he could
associate himself with the ancient sanctuary of his people. This time
indeed he failed to attain his object; the gates of Mecca remained
closed to the Mohammedans; nevertheless by the Peace of Hodaibiya he
won a ten years’ truce from the Koreish and the concession that he and
his believers should perform their prayers in the Kaaba for three days
annually. The zealous Omar was indignant at this agreement. “Art thou not
the messenger of the Lord? Are the Meccans not infidels and we believers?
Wherefore should we permit our faith to endure such an insult?”
But Mohammed preferred the lesser advantage to the uncertain issue of an
armed conflict, convinced that greater successes would soon follow from
small beginnings. He was not mistaken. In consequence of this treaty and
shortly after the fall of Khaibar, he undertook (March, 629) a pilgrimage
to Mecca, together with a party of his faithful followers, and great
was the joy of the exiles when for the first time they again trod their
native soil. Mohammed, mounted on his camel, accomplished the usual seven
circuits of the Kaaba and the pacing to and fro between the hills Safa
and Merwa and the rest followed him.
On this occasion Mohammed was united to Maimuna, a widow of fifty-one
years. As his former marriages since the death of Khadija were decided by
his sensuality and fondness for women and had at times been so scandalous
that, as in the case of Zainab, the divorced wife of his adopted son
Zaid, the indignation of the faithful at a hitherto unheard of and
forbidden alliance had to be quieted by a new command in the _Koran_
concerning relationship; so on the contrary this last marriage was like
his first, an act of wisdom, policy, and practical consideration. By this
marriage Maimuna’s kinsmen, Khalid and Amru, two distinguished warriors,
were won over to the cause of Islam--a victory of greater importance than
many a victorious battle.
[Illustration: AN ARAB WARRIOR]
The converts soon had an opportunity of increasing on a wider
battle-field the warlike renown which they had acquired in petty
quarrels. Mohammed had already turned his eyes to the frontiers of
Arabia. Encouraged by the growing numbers and enthusiasm of his devotees,
he believed that the time was not far off when Islam would acquire
the dominion of the world. The Jews had been compelled to pay dearly
for refusing to recognise him as their messiah; but, since they lived
scattered and held in contempt amongst other nations he could well
dispense with their homage if he succeeded in bringing the two most
powerful religious associations of the time, namely the Christians and
the fire-worshippers of Iran, to acknowledge his prophetic mission. With
this object he addressed documents to various foreign rulers, calling
on them to worship the one true God who had revealed himself through
Mohammed. Amongst the Christians especially he might have expected a
great welcome, since he not only owned Jesus to be a prophet but also
recognised the latter’s mother as a spotless virgin. In one of the
finest passages of the _Koran_ it is related how Mary, after the angel
of God had informed her that she should bear a “pure son,” had brought a
child into the world under a palm tree; how this child had spoken even
in the cradle and revealed himself as the “servant of God,” destined
to exercise every virtue of life and bring peace to men. According to
the Moslems, the ordinances of Mohammed’s religion found a favourable
reception amongst Christian princes. The king of Abyssinia, who had
always shown himself favourable to the adherents of the new prophet,
and the Christian general at Yemen are said to have gone over to Islam;
the prefect of Egypt requested time for consideration, but sent costly
gifts, among them two fair Coptic slaves for the voluptuous prophet. The
messengers of Mohammed invited the princes and nations of the earth to
join in the recognition of Islam, and one of them was even received by
the emperor Heraclius in a gracious and friendly manner. On the other
hand Chosroes II, then at the height of his power, tore the documents
unread and at the same time the ruler of Bosrah slew an Arabian envoy
who had endeavoured to win new converts for Islam. Against the former,
Mohammed launched a prophecy of evil, against the latter sent an army
under his former slave Zaid, whom on account of his faithfulness and
submission he had taken in the place of a son.
At Muta in Syria the Arabian hosts under the sacred standard had their
first encounter with the Græco-Roman legions. Zaid fell like a warrior
in the foremost ranks; in his place the brave and handsome Jafar, Ali’s
brother, seized Mohammed’s banner. Soon after he lost his right hand;
then he waved the standard in his left, and when this too was severed
from his body he held the sacred ensign in his bleeding arms till he
received the deathstroke. Abdallah ben Rawaha, the poet, now took the
standard from the dying hero, crying, “Forward! Either victory or
paradise is ours!” And when he too sank under the enemy’s lances Khalid,
the new convert of Mecca, grasped the banner and guided the battle to
a finish. It was not a decisive victory; but Khalid had given such
brilliant proofs of valour that in the nocturnal council of war held in
the camp he was chosen commander-in-chief and henceforth bore the famous
surname of “Sword of God.” Mournfully, though laden with glory and spoil,
the warrior host returned to Medina with the cherished corpses. Mohammed
extolled the lot of the fallen martyrs, but with Zaid’s young daughter he
mourned in secret for the beloved dead. “These are friendship’s tears at
the loss of a friend,” he said in excuse when someone coming in expressed
his astonishment that he should weep for him who had secured paradise by
his death.
SUBJECTION OF MECCA (630 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [630 A.D.]]
All therefore that Mohammed could hope was that his teaching might
obtain general recognition throughout Arabia, if he could once get the
sacred city of Mecca into his power. When he first led his armed host of
pilgrims into its neighbourhood he had assured his companions that God
had lent him the victory. Yet they had been compelled to withdraw, after
concluding an inglorious peace without marching round the Kaaba. Nor was
the chagrin of the believers relieved in the next year by their having
to approach the sanctuary during three days as suppliants; the disgrace
could only be wiped out by a brilliant victory. The Koreish themselves
played into Mohammed’s hands. They violated the treaty of peace by taking
part in a hostile attack on a tribe which had made a defensive alliance
with Mohammed. Then when they heard that an expedition for reprisals was
being prepared at Medina they were alarmed and sent Abu Sufyan, the proud
chief of the race, to the angry prophet, to excuse what had passed and
implore his forgiveness.
But Mohammed dismissed the suppliant without an answer and secretly
pushed on the preparations for war with great zeal. Suddenly ten
thousand watchfires on the neighbouring mountain betrayed the arrival
of a powerful enemy to the astonished Meccans. Abu Sufyan hastened out
to reconnoitre; Abbas brought him as a prisoner into the camp, where
Mohammed protected him from Omar’s anger as soon as he had declared
himself ready to honour the son of Abdallah as the messenger of God and
to pass to the ranks of Islam. He noted with admiration the excellent
discipline and bearing of the Mohammedan army, the multiplicity of
weapons and banners, the “helpers” and “refugees” enveloped in iron,
the enthusiastic veneration of the holy commander. “None can withstand
this man!” Sufyan said to Mohammed’s uncle, Abbas, who was conducting
him through the ranks, “by God, the kingdom of thy nephew is grown
great!” And he hastened back to his people to persuade them to peaceful
submission. In this he was successful. The most part shut themselves
up in their houses, as Mohammed had commanded, so that the Moslem army
was able to take possession of the city almost without resistance. Only
Khalid had to carve a way for himself into the lower city through a host
of unbelievers whom Akrama, the son of Abu Jahl, had collected under his
banner.
When Mohammed saw the chiefs of the Koreish in the dust at his feet, his
pride was satisfied and the nobler feelings of mildness and magnanimity
reigned in his breast. The people declared themselves ready to abjure
their gods, to honour Mohammed as God’s messenger and obey his behests,
whereupon the victor, now throned in his native city as prince and
prophet after eight years of banishment, proclaimed a general amnesty.
Even of the twelve men and six women whom, after his entry into the city,
Mohammed had condemned because in former years they had excited his anger
by apostasy, treachery, or mocking ballads, the majority were pardoned.
Amongst them was Akrama, the son of Abu Jahl, who had fought so bravely
at Ohod and had offered resistance to Khalid’s entrance; his uncle the
satirical poet Harith; Safwan, son of Omayyah and Hind, the passionate
wife of Abu Sufyan; the poet Kaab; Abdallah, Mohammed’s scribe, who was
accused of having defaced the sacred fly-leaves of the _Koran_ and in
order to escape punishment had fled as an apostate to Mecca; and many
others. They all went over to Islam, and Akrama soon exhibited the same
heroism in battle for the new faith which he had formerly displayed
against Mohammed. For Abdallah, his kinsman Othman made intercession;
Mohammed hesitated for some time over the pardon, in the hope that one of
his adherents would kill the traitor; then unwillingly let him go.
When order had been restored in the city Mohammed presented himself at
the temple. He went round the Kaaba seven times on his camel, each time
touching the sacred stone with his staff, and then broke in pieces the
idols, 360 in number, which were placed round the sanctuary. After this
he had the doors of the temple thrown open, cleansed the house of the
Lord from all images, and commanded Bilal to proclaim to the multitude
the call to prayer from the summit.
From the time of the prophet’s entry into Mecca the victory of Islam in
Arabia was only a question of time. But no religious organisation is
destroyed without some of its adherents contending for it with their
hearts’ blood. The old Arabian gods too had their steadfast worshippers,
who did not shrink from a martyr’s death for the religion of their
youth. When Mohammed’s hosts under fanatical leaders penetrated to
the surrounding tribes, the idols were thrown down and the ancient
sanctuaries destroyed, and then the infuriated pagans put themselves
on the defensive and many a sacrifice bled to the religious frenzy.
On one such expedition into the district of Teyma, the zealous Khalid
proceeded with such harshness and cruelty that Mohammed shuddered at it,
and lifting his hands to heaven cried out, “I have no share in these
deeds.” He then endeavoured to appease the sufferers through the medium
of Ali’s mildness and magnanimity, offered expiation for those slain, and
announced that Mecca and all the country should be as inviolable in the
future as in the past.
THE VICTORY OF HONAIN AND AUTAS
[Illustration: AN ARAB WARRIOR]
The religious frenzy of the Moslems roused the heathen tribes of the
mountain districts southeast of Mecca to take arms for the defence of
their belief, their life, and their property against the new religious
society. The Takifites, who had once driven away the ambassador of the
Lord with stones, and the Hawazin tribes headed the alliance of the
heathen faith. To animate their courage they took wives, children, and
all their possessions into the field with them. At this news Mohammed
started with his hosts to subdue his last obstinate enemy. But as they
marched through the valley of Honain without taking the necessary
precautions, they suddenly beheld the height occupied with bowmen. In
a short time the ranks of the Moslems gave way; flight and disorder
spread through them; the prophet’s cry, “I am Mohammed, the prophet of
God, the proclaimer of the truth; stand fast ye faithful!” was unheeded;
the Koreish who had followed the army were already giving vent to their
malicious joy in mocking words. At this moment Abbas, Mohammed’s uncle,
with his loud voice brought the flying and wavering to their senses. At
the cry of need the bravest and most spirited again collected round the
holy prince and won a complete victory.
In the valleys of Honain and Autas the power of the infidels was forever
broken. Seventy were slain, amongst them the old hero Duraid, and the
rest took to flight. Women, children, and spoil fell into the hands of
the victors. But Mohammed’s endeavour to conquer the strong city of Taif
was thwarted by the bravery of the inhabitants and the strength of the
walls; it was in vain that, contrary to his own command, he caused the
fruit trees to be felled and the vineyards to be dug up; in vain had the
soldiers marched to the storming of the town; after a siege of twenty
days’ duration he had to withdraw, having effected nothing. An enormous
booty rewarded and consoled the Moslems, but at Mohammed’s instance the
prisoners were restored to the newly converted tribes. Of his own fifth
he presented the greater part to those among the Koreish who had shown
themselves steadfast and faithful, and by this means he won over many
influential men to his cause. Abu Sufyan and his two sons each received
a hundred camels and forty ounces of silver. The Ansars, who murmured
at the favour thus shown to their adversaries, were appeased by an
affectionate appeal:
“Be not angry if I seek to win the hearts of a few waverers with
perishable goods. Your faith and submission have another reward. The
messenger of God intrusts you with his own life and fortune; in your
midst he returns to Medina; and as ye were the companions of my exile
and believed in me in my abasement, so shall ye be the companions of my
royalty and shall share in paradise with me.” They cried out weeping, “We
are content with our lot!”
The rest of the idolatrous tribes now no longer withstood a religion
which Mohammed’s envoys offered them, the _Koran_ in one hand and a sword
in the other. Even the Takifites soon after bought peace and security by
the sacrifice of their ancient gods, and opened the gates of their city
of their own free will.
The Takifites sent ambassadors to inform the prophet that they would go
over to Islam if he would exempt them from prayer and would leave them
their idol Lat but for three years more.
“Three years of idolatry is too long; and what is the worship of God
without prayers?” said Mohammed. The ambassadors then abated their
demands and finally an agreement was arrived at by which the Takifites
were to pay no taxes and were to keep their idol Lat for another year.
Thereupon he began to dictate the record with the words:
“In the name of God the merciful and long-suffering! By this document an
agreement is concluded between Mohammed, the messenger of God and the
Takifites, that the latter shall neither pay taxes nor take part in the
holy war.” But shame and the reproach of conscience arrested his tongue.
“Nor throw themselves on their faces in praying,” added the ambassador;
and as Mohammed persisted in his silence the Takifites repeated, as he
turned to the scribe:
“Write this; it is agreed upon.”
The scribe looked at Mohammed, waiting for his orders. At this moment the
fiery Omar, who had hitherto been a dumb witness of this scene, rose, and
drawing his sword, cried out:
“Thou hast defiled the heart of the prophet, and may God fill yours with
fire.”
“We speak not to thee, but to Mohammed,” answered the ambassador with
composure.
“Good,” said the prophet at this; “I will not hear of such a treaty. Ye
have your choice between an unconditional acceptance of Islam and war.”
“At least grant us,” said the thunderstruck Takifites, “the worship of
Lat for six months longer!”
“No!”
“Then for but one month!”
“Not for an hour!”
On which the ambassadors went back to their city in the company of
Mohammedan soldiers, who broke Lat to pieces amid the lamentations of the
women.
THE LAST YEARS OF MOHAMMED’S LIFE (630-632 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [630-632 A.D.]]
Mohammed returned to Medina like a victorious king; from all sides came
ambassadors and believing followers, to offer their homage and worship,
whilst far to the south his envoys on the seacoast won fresh devotees for
Islam.
“We are the helpers of God and the soldiers of his messenger,” said the
poet Thabit in a rhetorical contest; “we make war on all men until they
believe; only he who believes in God and his messenger saves his goods
and his blood; we are at feud with all infidels and our victory is always
easy.”
The Arab writers linger affectionately over the different scenes of
homage which the chiefs of the desert tribes, as well as the inhabitants
of the cities, paid to the prophet, the prince of the faithful, in these
first years of youthful enthusiasm. Yet adversities and misfortune
troubled the end of his life. A hostile party under the leadership of
Abdallah still subsisted in Medina. This was especially prominent when
the prophet was arranging a fresh expedition against the Greeks in Syria
in an oppressive heat, just when the Arabs were busied with the date
harvest. Consequently many evaded the order and Abdallah turned back with
his men soon after the start. A severe verse of the _Koran_ rebuked the
delay.
“Ye say, ‘go not out during the heat’; but God says by Mohammed, ‘the
fire of hell is more scorching.’ Your laughter is but of short duration
and ye shall one day weep long for your behaviour. Ye shall go forth no
more with me and fight no more by my side.”
At Tabuk, between Medina and Damascus, the army came to a halt, that
they might recover in that fertile neighbourhood from the toilsome,
painful march. Here Mohammed received the submission of the chiefs of
some of the Syrian border towns and the homage of a Christian prince.
They purchased peace at the price of an annual tribute. Nevertheless
Mohammed did not deem it advisable to advance further into the enemy’s
country with his small following; he set out on the return march, and
through many hardships and perils arrived at Medina after an absence of
twenty days. For a time the disobedient were excluded from the circle
of the believers; but when with penitence and contrition they sued
for forgiveness they were received back into favour. Soon after this,
death freed the prophet from his most dangerous adversary, Abdallah ben
Obayyah. This event, as well as the homage of more and more Arab tribes,
restored his spirits, which had been deeply affected by the death of his
two daughters, Zainab and Umm Kolthum. The ninth Sura of the _Koran_,
the symbol of the religion of the sword which he imparted to a host
of pilgrims in a reading at the site of the holy temple at Mecca, may
be taken as the outpouring of this exalted state of mind. In this he
renounced peace with all unbelievers, heathen, Jews, and Christians,
forbade them ever to set foot in the sanctuary, and declared perpetual
war against them to be a sacred duty. In it he also reiterated the
threats and curses against the hypocrites and loiterers who delayed to
march to the holy war. Ali’s delivery of this declaration before all
the people had the desired effect. The ambassadors, who in the name of
the princes and tribes declared the latter’s accession to Islam, were
as numerous “as the dates which fall from the palm tree in the time
of ripeness.” From the frontier of Syria to the southern end of the
peninsula and to the mountains bordering on the Indian Ocean and the
Persian Gulf, tribes of all tongues and religions hastened to find the
key of paradise in the faith in the “One God who has no fellow.” When in
the tenth year of the Hegira, Mohammed, with his nine wives, proceeded
on his last pilgrimage to Mecca, which was to serve the Moslems for all
future times as a pattern and example, 40,000 (or according to some
accounts as many as 114,000) of the faithful accompanied him.
On this pilgrimage the suffering condition of the prophet first became
manifest. With great effort he passed seven times round the Kaaba, and
as he did so he prayed: “O Lord, prosper us in this life and the next,
and preserve us from the pains of hell.” The unnatural agitations and
paroxysms of his soul, the great physical exertions, the insidious poison
of Khaibar, and finally his grief at the loss of his young son Ibrahim,
whom, to his extreme joy, the Egyptian slave Maria had borne to him in
the previous year and on whom he had set all his hopes--all these things
undermined his health and hastened his end. The laments into which he
broke out at sight of the child’s corpse already contained a foreboding
of his own approaching end.
“I am grieved at thy loss,” he said, “mine eye weeps and my heart is sad,
yet will I utter no lament which may anger the Lord; were I not convinced
that I should follow thee, my grief would be inconsolable, but we are
God’s and shall return to him.”
[Sidenote: [632 A.D.]]
Three months after his return Mohammed was overtaken in the house of his
spouse, Aisha, by an illness which lasted from eight to fourteen days.
Often a fierce fever would rob him of consciousness, but often again
he had hours of lucidity which he spent in converse with Aisha, his
favourite daughter Fatima, the only one of his children who survived her
father, and with the friends and relatives who visited him. Besides this,
although already extremely ill, he would still go into the neighbouring
mosque and speak words of admonition and farewell to the assembled
people. As his weakness increased he allowed the prayers to be spoken
by Abu Bekr, but was still always present. On the last day he seemed
better, so that all save Aisha left him. But soon his illness returned
with renewed severity. Before he lost consciousness he gave his slaves
their freedom, caused the six or seven dinars[33] which he had in his
house to be given to the poor, and then prayed, “God support me in the
death struggle.” Aisha had sent for her father and his other followers,
but before they arrived he expired in the arms of his favourite wife. His
last words were: “To the glorious comrades in paradise.”
He died in the eleventh year of the Hegira in the three-and-sixtieth year
of his life, “the prophet, poet, priest, and king of Arabia.” On the news
of his departure a great wailing was raised in Aisha’s dwelling, and
the people thronged round the door in wild excitement, which was still
further increased by Omar’s assurances that the messenger of God was not
dead, but would shortly return to his people. Finally the judicious words
of Abu Bekr succeeded in calming the crowd:
“O ye people,” he said, “let him amongst you who served Mohammed know
that Mohammed is dead; but let him who served God continue in his
service, for Mohammed’s God lives and never dies.” Then he read them a
verse of the _Koran_: “Mohammed is only a messenger, many messengers are
already gone before him; whether he died a natural death or was slain,
shall ye turn on your heels? He who does this (forsakes his faith), can
do no harm to God, but the grateful shall be rewarded.” Despair now
passed into quiet grief; Omar himself was so moved that he fell to the
earth and acknowledged that Mohammed was really dead.
Three days later Mohammed was lowered into the earth at the spot where he
had died. His tomb at Medina was subsequently included within the bounds
of the sanctuary by the enlargement of the mosque, which stood next to
the house, and like the Kaaba of Mecca it has remained up to the present
time to be a place of pilgrimage much resorted to by pious Moslems.
Osama, the youthful son of that Zaid who had fallen at Muta, was absent
on a new campaign against Syria at the moment when he received tidings of
the prophet’s death. He at once led his soldiers back to Medina, and full
of sadness set up his banner before the house.[f]
The personal traits of Mohammed are preserved to us in wonderfully minute
details and illustrated by numberless anecdotes, many of which are of
course apocryphal. We may quote a brief and vivid picture from the
_Sirat_ or _Biography of Mohammed_, written by Ibn Saad,[g] the secretary
of the Arab historian Wakidi. The translation is from unpublished
manuscript notes by Sir William Muir,[e] the modern biographer of
Mohammed.[a]
“He was fair of complexion with a measure of redness; eyes intensely
black; his hair not crisp but depending; beard bushy and thick; cheeks
not fat; his neck shone like a vessel of silver; he had a line of hair
from his breast to his navel like a branch, but besides this he had no
hair on his belly or chest. His hands and feet were not hollow, but
filled up. When he walked it was as though he walked from a higher to a
lower place; and when he walked it was as though he pulled (or wrenched)
his feet from the stones; when he turned he turned round entirely. The
perspiration on his face was like pearls, and the smell thereof was
pleasanter than musk of pure quality. He was neither long nor short; he
was neither weakly nor vile; the like of him I never saw before or after.
“Mohammed had a large head, large eyes, large eyelashes; his colour
bright and shining; large joints of his limbs; a long narrow line of hair
from his chest to his belly. He was not very tall, but above the middle
height. When he approached with his people he appeared to cover them
(shutting them out of view). His hair was neither crisp nor frizzled;
curly nor quite smooth and plain. It was like that of a curly-haired man
combed out. His face was neither very fat nor very lean; it was round; he
had large joints and a broad chest. His body was free from hair. Who ever
saw him for the first time would be awe stricken at his appearance, but
on close intimacy this would give way to love. His pupil was intensely
black; his back large.”[g]
GIBBON’S ESTIMATE OF MOHAMMED AND MOHAMMEDANISM
[Sidenote: [622-632 A.D.]]
At the conclusion of the life of Mohammed, it may perhaps be expected
that I should balance his faults and virtues, that I should decide
whether the title of enthusiast or impostor more properly belongs to
that extraordinary man. Had I been intimately conversant with the son of
Abdallah, the task would still be difficult, and the success uncertain:
at the distance of twelve centuries, I darkly contemplate his shade
through a cloud of religious incense; and could I truly delineate the
portrait of an hour, the fleeting resemblance would not equally apply
to the solitary of Mount Hira, to the preacher of Mecca, and to the
conqueror of Arabia. The author of a mighty revolution appears to have
been endowed with a pious and contemplative disposition; so soon as
marriage had raised him above the pressure of want, he avoided the
paths of ambition and avarice; and till the age of forty, he lived with
innocence, and would have died without a name. The unity of God is an
idea most congenial to nature and reason; and a slight conversation
with the Jews and Christians would teach him to despise and detest the
idolatry of Mecca. It was the duty of a man and a citizen to impart the
doctrine of salvation, to rescue his country from the dominion of sin and
error. The energy of a mind incessantly bent on the same object, would
convert a general obligation into a particular call; the warm suggestions
of the understanding or the fancy would be felt as the inspirations of
heaven; the labour of thought would expire in rapture and vision; and the
inward sensation, the invisible monitor, would be described with the form
and attributes of an angel of God.
From enthusiasm to imposture the step is perilous and slippery; the
demon of Socrates affords a memorable instance how a wise man may
deceive himself, how a good man may deceive others, how the conscience
may slumber in a mixed middle state between self-illusion and voluntary
fraud. Charity may believe that the original motives of Mohammed were
those of pure and genuine benevolence; but a human missionary is
incapable of cherishing the obstinate unbelievers who reject his claims,
despise his arguments, and persecute his life; he might forgive his
personal adversaries, he may lawfully hate the enemies of God; the stern
passions of pride and revenge were kindled in the bosom of Mohammed,
and he sighed, like the prophet of Nineveh, for the destruction of the
rebels whom he had condemned. The injustice of Mecca and the choice of
Medina transformed the citizen into a prince, the humble preacher into
the leader of armies; but his sword was consecrated by the example of
the saints; and the same God who afflicts a sinful world with pestilence
and earthquakes might inspire for their conversion or chastisement the
valour of his servants. In the exercise of political government he was
compelled to abate the stern rigour of fanaticism, to comply, in some
measure, with the prejudices and passions of his followers, and to employ
even the vices of mankind as the instruments of their salvation. The use
of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient
to the propagation of the faith; and Mohammed commanded or approved the
assassination of the Jews and idolaters who had escaped from the field of
battle.
By the repetition of such acts, the character of Mohammed must have been
gradually stained; and the influence of such pernicious habits would be
poorly compensated by the practice of the personal and social virtues,
which are necessary to maintain the reputation of a prophet among his
sectaries and friends. Of his last years, ambition was the ruling
passion; and a politician will suspect that he secretly smiled (the
victorious impostor!) at the enthusiasm of his youth and the credulity of
his proselytes. A philosopher would observe that their credulity and his
success would tend more strongly to fortify the assurance of his divine
mission, that his interest and religion were inseparably connected, and
that his conscience would be soothed by the persuasion that he alone was
absolved by the Deity from the obligation of positive and moral laws. If
he retained any vestige of his native innocence, the sins of Mohammed
may be allowed as the evidence of his sincerity. In the support of truth,
the arts of fraud and fiction may be deemed less criminal; and he would
have started at the foulness of the means, had he not been satisfied of
the importance and justice of the end. The decree of Mohammed that, in
the sale of captives, the mothers should never be separated from their
children, may suspend or moderate the censure of the historian.
The good sense of Mohammed despised the pomp of royalty; the apostle
of God submitted to the menial offices of the family; he kindled the
fire, swept the floor, milked the ewes, and mended with his own hands
his shoes and his woollen garment. Disdaining the penance and merit of
a hermit, he observed, without effort or vanity, the abstemious diet of
an Arab and a soldier. On solemn occasions he feasted his companions
with rustic and hospitable plenty; but in his domestic life many weeks
would elapse without a fire being kindled on the hearth of the prophet.
The interdiction of wine was confirmed by his example; his hunger was
appeased with a sparing allowance of barley-bread; he delighted in the
taste of milk and honey, but his ordinary food consisted of dates and
water. Perfumes and women were the two sensual enjoyments which his
nature required and his religion did not forbid; and Mohammed affirmed
that the fervour of his devotion was increased by these innocent
pleasures. The heat of the climate inflames the blood of the Arabs; and
their libidinous complexion has been noticed by the writers of antiquity.
Their incontinence was regulated by the civil and religious laws of the
_Koran_; their incestuous alliances were blamed; the boundless license
of polygamy was reduced to four legitimate wives or concubines; their
rights both of bed and of dowry were equitably determined; the freedom of
divorce was discouraged; adultery was condemned as a capital offence; and
fornication, in either sex, was punished with a hundred stripes.
Such were the calm and rational precepts of the legislator; but in his
private conduct Mohammed indulged the appetites of a man and abused the
claims of a prophet. A special revelation dispensed him from the laws
which he had imposed on his nation; the female sex, without reserve,
was abandoned to his desires; and this singular prerogative excited the
envy rather than the scandal, the veneration rather than the envy of
the devout Mussulmans. If we remember the seven hundred wives and three
hundred concubines of the wise Solomon, we shall applaud the modesty
of the Arabian, who espoused no more than seventeen or fifteen wives;
eleven are enumerated, who occupied at Medina their separate apartments
round the house of the apostle, and enjoyed in their turns the favour
of his conjugal society. What is singular enough, they were all widows,
excepting only Aisha, the daughter of Abu Bekr. She was doubtless a
virgin, since Mohammed consummated his nuptials (such is the premature
ripeness of the climate) when she was only nine years of age. The
youth, the beauty, the spirit of Aisha, gave her a superior ascendant:
she was beloved and trusted by the prophet; and after his death the
daughter of Abu Bekr was long revered as the mother of the faithful. Her
behaviour had been ambiguous and indiscreet; in a nocturnal march she was
accidentally left behind, and in the morning Aisha returned to the camp
with a man.
The temper of Mohammed was inclined to jealousy; but a divine revelation
assured him of her innocence; he chastised her accusers, and published
a law of domestic peace, that no woman should be condemned unless four
male witnesses had seen her in the act of adultery. In his adventures
with Zainab, the wife of Zaid, and with Maria, an Egyptian captive,
the amorous prophet forgot the interest of his reputation. At the house
of Zaid, his freedman and adopted son, he beheld in a loose undress the
beauty of Zainab, and burst forth into an ejaculation of devotion and
desire. The servile, or grateful, freedman understood the hint, and
yielded without hesitation to the love of his benefactor. But as the
filial relation had excited some doubt and scandal, the angel Gabriel
descended from heaven to ratify the deed, to annul the adoption, and
gently to reprove the apostle for distrusting the indulgence of his God.
One of his wives, Hafsa, the daughter of Omar, surprised him on her own
bed in the embraces of his Egyptian captive; she promised secrecy and
forgiveness, he swore that he would renounce the possession of Maria.
Both parties forgot their engagements, and Gabriel again descended with
a chapter of the _Koran_, to absolve him from his oath and to exhort him
freely to enjoy his captives and concubines, without listening to the
clamours of his wives. In a solitary retreat of thirty days, he laboured,
alone with Maria, to fulfil the commands of the angel. When his love and
revenge were satiated, he summoned to his presence his eleven wives,
reproached their disobedience and indiscretion, and threatened them
with a sentence of divorce, both in this world and the next--a dreadful
sentence, since those who had ascended the bed of the prophet were
forever excluded from the hope of a second marriage.
[Illustration: A SARACENIC CANDLESTICK]
Perhaps the incontinence of Mohammed may be palliated by the tradition of
his natural or preternatural gifts; he united the manly virtue of thirty
of the children of Adam, and the apostle might rival the thirteenth
labour of the Grecian Hercules. A more serious and decent excuse may be
drawn from his fidelity to Khadija. During the twenty-four years of their
marriage her youthful husband abstained from the right of polygamy, and
the pride or tenderness of the venerable matron was never insulted by
the society of a rival. After her death he placed her in the rank of the
four perfect women, with the sister of Moses, the mother of Jesus, and
Fatima, the best beloved of his daughters. “Was she not old?” said Aisha,
with the insolence of a blooming beauty, “has not God given you a better
in her place?” “No, by God,” said Mohammed, with an effusion of honest
gratitude, “there never can be a better! she believed in me when men
despised me; she relieved my wants when I was poor and persecuted by the
world.”
In the largest indulgence of polygamy, the founder of a religion and
empire might aspire to multiply the chances of a numerous posterity and a
lineal succession. The hopes of Mohammed were fatally disappointed. The
virgin Aisha, and his ten widows of mature age and approved fertility,
were barren in his potent embraces. The four sons of Khadija died in
their infancy. Maria, his Egyptian concubine, was endeared to him by the
birth of Ibrahim. At the end of fifteen months the prophet wept over his
grave; but he sustained with firmness the raillery of his enemies, and
checked the adulation or credulity of the Moslems, by the assurance that
an eclipse of the sun was not occasioned by the death of the infant.
Khadija had likewise given him four daughters, who were married to the
most faithful of his disciples; the three eldest died before their
father; but Fatima, who possessed his confidence and love, became the
wife of her cousin Ali, and the mother of an illustrious progeny.
From his earliest youth, Mohammed was addicted to religious
contemplation; each year, during the month of Ramadhan, he withdrew
from the world and from the arms of Khadija; in the cave of Hira, three
miles from Mecca, he consulted the spirit of fraud or enthusiasm, whose
abode is not in the heavens but in the mind of the prophet. The faith
which, under the name of Islam, he preached to his family and nation, is
compounded of an eternal truth and a necessary fiction--that there is
only one God, and that Mohammed is the apostle of God.
The Christians of the seventh century had insensibly relapsed into a
semblance of paganism; their public and private vows were addressed to
the relics and images that disgraced the temples of the East; the throne
of the Almighty was darkened by a cloud of martyrs, and saints, and
angels, the objects of popular veneration; and the Collyridian heretics,
who flourished in the fruitful soil of Arabia, invested the Virgin Mary
with the name and honours of a goddess. The creed of Mohammed is free
from suspicion or ambiguity; and the _Koran_ is a glorious testimony
to the unity of God. The prophet of Mecca rejected the worship of
idols and men, of stars and planets, on the rational principle that
whatever rises must set, that whatever is born must die, that whatever
is corruptible must decay and perish. In the author of the universe,
his rational enthusiasm confessed and adored an infinite and eternal
being, without form or place, without issue or similitude, present to
our most secret thoughts, existing by the necessity of his own nature,
and deriving from himself all moral and intellectual perfection. These
sublime truths, thus announced in the language of the prophet, are firmly
held by his disciples, and defined with metaphysical precision by the
interpreters of the _Koran_. The first principle of reason and revelation
was confirmed by the voice of Mohammed; his proselytes, from India to
Morocco, are distinguished by the name of Unitarians; and the danger of
idolatry has been prevented by the interdiction of images. The doctrine
of eternal decrees and absolute predestination is strictly embraced by
the Mohammedans; and they struggle with the common difficulties, how to
reconcile the prescience of God with the freedom and responsibility of
man; how to explain the permission of evil under the reign of infinite
power and infinite goodness.
The liberality of Mohammed allowed to his predecessors the same credit
which he claimed for himself; and the chain of inspiration was prolonged
from the fall of Adam to the promulgation of the _Koran_. During that
period, some rays of prophetic light had been imparted to 124,000 of
the elect, discriminated by their respective measure of virtue and
grace; 313 apostles were sent with a special commission to recall their
country from idolatry and vice; 104 volumes had been dictated by the holy
spirit; and six legislators of transcendent brightness have announced
to mankind the six successive revelations of various rites, but of one
immutable religion. The authority and station of Adam, Noah, Abraham,
Moses, Christ, and Mohammed rise in just gradation above each other;
but whosoever hates or rejects any one of the prophets is numbered with
the infidels. The writings of the patriarchs were extant only in the
apocryphal copies of the Greeks and Syrians; the conduct of Adam had
not entitled him to the gratitude or respect of his children; the seven
precepts of Noah were observed by an inferior and imperfect class of the
proselytes of the synagogue, and the memory of Abraham was obscurely
revered by the Sabians in his native land of Chaldea; of the myriads of
prophets, Moses and Christ alone lived and reigned; and the remnant of
the inspired writings was comprised in the books of the Old and the New
Testament. The miraculous story of Moses is consecrated and embellished
in the _Koran_; and the captive Jews enjoy the secret revenge of imposing
their belief on the nations whose recent creeds they deride. For the
author of Christianity, the Mohammedans are taught by the prophet to
entertain a high and mysterious reverence. “Verily, Christ Jesus, the
son of Mary, is the Apostle of God, and His word, which He conveyed unto
Mary, and a spirit proceeding from him are honourable in this world,
and in the world to come; and He is one of those who approach near to
the presence of God.” The piety of Moses and of Christ rejoiced in the
assurance of a future prophet, more illustrious than themselves; the
evangelic promise of the Paraclete, or Holy Ghost, was prefigured in the
name, and accomplished in the person, of Mohammed, the greatest and the
last of the apostles of God.
The inspiration of the Hebrew prophets, of the apostles and evangelists
of Christ, might not be incompatible with the exercise of their reason
and memory; and the diversity of their genius is strongly marked in the
style and composition of the books of the Old and New Testament. But
Mohammed was content with a character, more humble yet more sublime, of
a simple editor; the substance of the _Koran_, according to himself or
his disciples, is uncreated and eternal; subsisting in the essence of the
Deity, and inscribed with a pen of light on the table of his everlasting
decrees. A paper copy, in a volume of silk and gems, was brought down to
the lowest heaven by the angel Gabriel, who, under the Jewish economy,
had indeed been despatched on the most important errands; and this trusty
messenger successively revealed the chapters and verses to the Arabian
prophet. Instead of a perpetual and perfect measure of the divine will,
the fragments of the _Koran_ were produced at the discretion of Mohammed;
each revelation is suited to the emergencies of his policy or passion;
and all contradiction is removed by the saving maxim that any text of
Scripture is abrogated or modified by any subsequent passage. The word of
God, and of the apostle, was diligently recorded by his disciples on palm
leaves and the shoulder bones of mutton; and the pages, without order or
connection, were cast into a domestic chest in the custody of one of his
wives.
Two years after the death of Mohammed the sacred volume was collected
and published by his friend and successor Abu Bekr. The work was revised
by the caliph Othman, in the thirtieth year of the Hegira; and the
various editions of the _Koran_ assert the same miraculous privilege of a
uniform and incorruptible text. In the spirit of enthusiasm or vanity,
the prophet rests the truth of his mission on the merit of his book,
audaciously challenges both men and angels to imitate the beauties of a
single page, and presumes to assert that God alone could dictate this
incomparable performance. This argument is most powerfully addressed to
a devout Arabian, whose mind is attuned to faith and rapture, whose ear
is delighted by the music of sounds, and whose ignorance is incapable of
comparing the productions of human genius. The harmony and copiousness
of style will not reach, in a version, the European infidel; he will
peruse with impatience the endless incoherent rhapsody of fable, and
precept, and declamation, which seldom excites a sentiment or an idea,
which sometimes crawls in the dust, and is sometimes lost in the clouds.
The divine attributes exalt the fancy of the Arabian missionary; but his
loftiest strains must yield to the sublime simplicity of the book of Job,
composed in a remote age, in the same country, and in the same language.
If the composition of the _Koran_ exceed the faculties of a man, to what
superior intelligence should we ascribe the _Iliad_ of Homer or the
_Philippics_ of Demosthenes?
In all religions, the life of the founder supplies the silence of his
written revelation; the sayings of Mohammed were so many lessons of
truth, his actions so many examples of virtue; and the public and private
memorials were preserved by his wives and companions. At the end of two
hundred years the _sunna_, or oral law, was fixed and consecrated by the
labours of Al-Buchari, who discriminated 7,275 traditions, from a mass of
300,000 reports of a more doubtful or spurious character. Each day the
pious author prayed in the temple of Mecca, and performed his ablutions
with the water of Zemzem; the pages were successively deposited on the
pulpit and the sepulchre of the apostle; and the work has been approved
by the four orthodox sects of the Sunnites.
The mission of the ancient prophets, of Moses, and of Jesus, had been
confirmed by many splendid prodigies; and Mohammed was repeatedly urged
by the inhabitants of Mecca and Medina to produce a similar evidence of
his divine legation; to call down from heaven the angel or the volume
of his revelation, to create a garden in the desert, or to kindle a
conflagration in the unbelieving city. As often as he is pressed by the
demands of the Koreish, he involves himself in the obscure boast of
vision and prophecy, appeals to the internal proofs of his doctrine, and
shields himself behind the providence of God, who refuses those signs and
wonders that would depreciate the merit of faith and aggravate the guilt
of infidelity. But the modest or angry tone of his apologies betrays his
weakness and vexation; and these passages of scandal establish, beyond
suspicion, the integrity of the _Koran_.
The votaries of Mohammed are more assured than himself of his miraculous
gifts, and their confidence and credulity increase as they are further
removed from the time and place of his spiritual exploits. They believe
or affirm that trees went forth to meet him; that he was saluted by
stones; that water gushed from his fingers; that he fed the hungry,
cured the sick, and raised the dead; that a beam groaned to him; that a
camel complained to him; that a shoulder of mutton informed him of its
being poisoned; and that both animate and inanimate nature were equally
subject to the apostle of God. His dream of a nocturnal journey is
seriously described as a real and corporeal transaction. A mysterious
animal, the borak, conveyed him from the temple of Mecca to that of
Jerusalem; with his companion Gabriel he successively ascended the seven
heavens, and received and repaid the salutations of the patriarchs, the
prophets, and the angels, in their respective mansions. Beyond the
seventh heaven, Mohammed alone was permitted to proceed; he passed the
veil of unity, approached within two bow-shots of the throne, and felt
a cold that pierced him to the heart when his shoulder was touched by
the hand of God. After this familiar, though important conversation, he
again descended to Jerusalem, remounted the borak, returned to Mecca,
and performed in the tenth part of a night the journey of many thousand
years. According to another legend, the apostle confounded in a national
assembly the malicious challenge of the Koreish. His resistless word
split asunder the orb of the moon; the obedient planet stooped from her
station in the sky, accomplished the seven revolutions round the Kaaba,
saluted Mohammed in the Arabian tongue, and suddenly contracting her
dimensions entered at the collar, and issued forth through the sleeve of
his shirt. The vulgar are amused with these marvellous tales; but the
gravest of the Mussulman doctors imitate the modesty of their master,
and indulge a latitude of faith or interpretation. They might speciously
allege that, in preaching the religion, it was needless to violate the
harmony of nature; that a creed unclouded with mystery may be excused
from miracles; and that the sword of Mohammed was not less potent than
the rod of Moses.
[Illustration: AN ARAB CHIEF]
The polytheist is oppressed and distracted by the variety of
superstition; a thousand rites of Egyptian origin were interwoven
with the essence of the Mosaic law, and the spirit of the Gospel had
evaporated in the pageantry of the church. The prophet of Mecca was
tempted, by prejudice, or policy, or patriotism, to sanctify the rites
of the Arabians and the custom of visiting the holy stone of the Kaaba.
But the precepts of Mohammed himself inculcate a more simple and rational
piety; prayer, fasting, and alms are the religious duties of a Mussulman;
and he is encouraged to hope that prayer will carry him half-way to God,
fasting will bring him to the door of his palace, and alms will gain him
admittance.
(1) According to the tradition of the nocturnal journey, the apostle,
in his personal conference with the Deity, was commanded to impose on
his disciples the daily obligation of fifty prayers. By the advice
of Moses, he applied for an alleviation of this intolerable burden;
the number was gradually reduced to five; without any dispensation of
business or pleasure, or time or place, the devotion of the faithful
is repeated at daybreak, at noon, in the afternoon, in the evening, and
at the first watch of the night; and in the present decay of religious
fervour our travellers are edified by the profound humility and
attention of the Turks and Persians. Cleanliness is the key of prayer;
the frequent lustration of the hands, the face, and the body, which was
practised of old by the Arabs, is solemnly enjoined by the _Koran_;
and a permission is formally granted to supply with sand the scarcity
of water. The words and attitudes of supplication, as it is performed
either sitting, or standing, or prostrate on the ground, are prescribed
by custom or authority, but the prayer is poured forth in short and
fervent ejaculations; the measure of zeal is not exhausted by a tedious
liturgy; and each Mussulman, for his own person, is invested with the
character of a priest. Among the theists, who reject the use of images,
it has been found necessary to restrain the wanderings of the fancy by
directing the eye and the thought towards a _kibla_, or visible point of
the horizon. The prophet was at first inclined to gratify the Jews by the
choice of Jerusalem, but he soon returned to a more natural partiality;
and five times every day the eyes of the nations at Astrakhan, at Fez,
at Delhi are devoutly turned to the holy temple of Mecca. Yet every spot
for the service of God is equally pure; the Mohammedans indifferently
pray in their chamber or in the street. As a distinction from the Jews
and Christians, the Friday in each week is set apart for the useful
institution of public worship; the people are assembled in the mosque;
and the imam, some respectable elder, ascends the pulpit, to begin the
prayer and pronounce the sermon. But the Mohammedan religion is destitute
of priesthood or sacrifice; and the independent spirit of fanaticism
looks down with contempt on the ministers and the slaves of superstition.
(2) The voluntary penance of the ascetics, the torment and glory of their
lives, was odious to a prophet who censured in his companions a rash vow
of abstaining from flesh, and women, and sleep; and firmly declared that
he would suffer no monks in his religion. Yet he instituted, in each
year, a fast of thirty days; and strenuously recommended the observance,
as a discipline which purifies the soul and subdues the body, as a
salutary exercise of obedience to the will of God and his apostle. During
the month of Ramadhan, from the rising to the setting of the sun, the
Mussulman abstains from eating, and drinking, and women, and baths, and
perfumes; from all nourishment that can restore his strength, from all
pleasure that can gratify his senses. In the revolution of the lunar
year, the Ramadhan coincides by turns with the winter cold and the
summer heat; and the patient martyr, without assuaging his thirst with
a drop of water, must expect the close of a tedious and sultry day. The
interdiction of wine, peculiar to some orders of priests or hermits,
is converted by Mohammed alone into a positive and general law; and a
considerable portion of the globe has abjured, at his command, the use
of that salutary though dangerous liquor. These painful restraints are,
doubtless, infringed by the libertine and eluded by the hypocrite; but
the legislator by whom they are enacted cannot surely be accused of
alluring his proselytes by the indulgence of their sensual appetites.
(3) The charity of the Mohammedans descends to the animal creation; and
the _Koran_ repeatedly inculcates, not as a merit but as a strict and
indispensable duty, the relief of the indigent and unfortunate. Mohammed,
perhaps, is the only lawgiver who has defined the precise measure of
charity; the standard may vary with the degree and nature of property, as
it consists either in money, in corn or cattle, in fruits or merchandise;
but the Mussulman does not accomplish the law unless he bestows a
tenth of his revenue; and if his conscience accuses him of fraud or
extortion, the tenth, under the idea of restitution, is enlarged to a
fifth. Benevolence is the foundation of justice, since we are forbidden
to injure those whom we are bound to assist. A prophet may reveal the
secrets of heaven and of futurity; but in his moral precepts he can only
repeat the lessons of our own hearts.
The two articles of belief and the four practical duties of Islam are
guarded by rewards and punishments; and the faith of the Mussulman is
devoutly fixed on the event of the judgment and the last day. The prophet
has not presumed to determine the moment of that awful catastrophe,
though he darkly announces the signs, both in heaven and earth, which
will precede the universal dissolution, when life shall be destroyed and
the order of creation shall be confounded in the primitive chaos. At the
blast of the trumpet, new worlds will start into being; angels, genii,
and men will arise from the dead, and the human soul will again be united
to the body. The doctrine of the resurrection was first entertained by
the Egyptians; and their mummies were embalmed, their pyramids were
constructed, to preserve the ancient mansion of the soul during a period
of three thousand years. But the attempt is partial and unavailing;
and it is with a more philosophic spirit that Mohammed relies on the
omnipotence of the Creator, whose word can reanimate the breathless clay,
and collect the innumerable atoms that no longer retain their form or
substance. The intermediate state of the soul it is hard to decide; and
those who most firmly believe in her immaterial nature, are at a loss to
understand how she can think or act without the agency of the organs of
sense.
The reunion of the soul and body will be followed by the final judgment
of mankind; and in his copy of the magian picture the prophet has too
faithfully represented the forms of proceeding, and even the slow
and successive operations of an earthly tribunal. By his intolerant
adversaries he is upbraided for extending, even to themselves, the hope
of salvation; for asserting the blackest heresy--that every man who
believes in God and accomplishes good works may expect in the last day
a favourable sentence. Such rational indifference is ill adapted to the
character of a fanatic; nor is it probable that a messenger from heaven
should depreciate the value and necessity of his own revelation. In the
idiom of the _Koran_, the belief of God is inseparable from that of
Mohammed; the good works are those which he has enjoined; and the two
qualifications imply the profession of Islam, to which all nations and
all sects are equally invited. Their spiritual blindness, though excused
by ignorance and crowned with virtue, will be scourged with everlasting
torments; and the tears which Mohammed shed over the tomb of his mother,
for whom he was forbidden to pray, display a striking contrast of
humanity and enthusiasm.
The doom of the infidels is common; the measure of their guilt and
punishment is determined by the degree of evidence which they have
rejected, by the magnitude of the errors which they have entertained; the
eternal mansions of the Christians, the Jews, the Sabians, the Magians,
and the idolaters are sunk below each other in the abyss; and the lowest
hell is reserved for the faithless hypocrites who have assumed the mask
of religion. After the greater part of mankind has been condemned for
their opinions, the true believers only will be judged by their actions.
The good and evil of each Mussulman will be accurately weighed in a
real or allegorical balance, and a singular mode of compensation will
be allowed for the payment of injuries; the aggressor will refund an
equivalent of his own good actions for the benefit of the person whom
he has wronged; and if he should be destitute of any moral property,
the weight of his sins will be loaded with an adequate share of the
demerits of the sufferer. According as the shares of guilt or virtue
shall preponderate, the sentence will be pronounced, and all, without
distinction, will pass over the sharp and perilous bridge of the abyss;
but the innocent, treading in the footsteps of Mohammed, will gloriously
enter the gates of paradise, while the guilty will fall into the first
and mildest of the seven hells. The term of expiation will vary from nine
hundred to seven thousand years; but the prophet has judiciously promised
that all his disciples, whatever may be their sins, shall be saved, by
their own faith and his intercession, from eternal damnation.
It is not surprising that superstition should act most powerfully on
the fears of her votaries, since the human fancy can paint with more
energy the misery than the bliss of a future life. With the two simple
elements of darkness and fire we create a sensation of pain, which may be
aggravated to an infinite degree by the idea of endless duration. But the
same idea operates with an opposite effect on the continuity of pleasure;
and too much of our present enjoyment is obtained from the relief, or
the comparison of evil. It is natural enough that an Arabian prophet
should dwell with rapture on the groves, the fountains, and the rivers of
paradise; but instead of inspiring the blessed inhabitants with a liberal
taste for harmony and science, conversation and friendship, he idly
celebrates the pearls and diamonds, the robes of silk, palaces of marble,
dishes of gold, rich wines, artificial dainties, numerous attendants, and
the whole train of sensual and costly luxury which becomes insipid to the
owner, even in the short period of this mortal life. Seventy-two houris,
or black-eyed girls, of resplendent beauty, blooming youth, virgin
purity, and exquisite sensibility will be created for the use of the
meanest believer; a moment of pleasure will be prolonged to a thousand
years, and his faculties will be increased a hundredfold, to render him
worthy of his felicity.
Notwithstanding a vulgar prejudice, the gates of heaven will be open to
both sexes; but Mohammed has not specified the male companions of the
female elect, lest he should either alarm the jealousy of their former
husbands, or disturb their felicity by the suspicion of an everlasting
marriage. This image of a carnal paradise has provoked the indignation,
perhaps the envy, of the monks; they declaim against the impure religion
of Mohammed; and his modest apologists are driven to the poor excuse
of figures and allegories. But the sounder and more consistent party
adheres, without shame, to the literal interpretation of the _Koran_;
useless would be the resurrection of the body, unless it were restored to
the possession and exercise of its worthiest faculties; and the union of
sensual and intellectual enjoyment is requisite to complete the happiness
of the double animal, the perfect man. Yet the joys of the Mohammedan
paradise will not be confined to the indulgence of luxury and appetite;
and the prophet has expressly declared that all meaner happiness will be
forgotten and despised by the saints and martyrs, who shall be admitted
to the beatitude of the divine vision.
The talents of Mohammed are entitled to our applause; but his success
has perhaps too strongly attracted our admiration. Are we surprised that
a multitude of proselytes should embrace the doctrine and the passions
of an eloquent fanatic? In the heresies of the church the same seduction
has been tried and repeated from the time of the apostles to that of
the reformers. Does it seem incredible that a private citizen should
grasp the sword and the sceptre, subdue his native country, and erect a
monarchy by his victorious arms? In the moving picture of the dynasties
of the East, a hundred fortunate usurpers have arisen from a baser
origin, surmounted more formidable obstacles, and filled a larger scope
of empire and conquest.
Mohammed was alike instructed to preach and to fight, and the union of
these opposite qualities, while it enhanced his merit, contributed to his
success; the operation of force and persuasion, of enthusiasm and fear,
continually acted on each other, till every barrier yielded to their
irresistible power. His voice invited the Arabs to freedom and victory,
to arms and rapine, to the indulgence of their darling passions in this
world and the other; the restraints which he imposed were requisite to
establish the credit of the prophet and to exercise the obedience of the
people; and the only objection to his success was his rational creed of
the unity and perfections of God.
It is not the propagation but the permanency of his religion that
deserves our wonder; the same pure and perfect impression which he
engraved at Mecca and Medina is preserved after the revolutions of twelve
centuries by the Indian, the African, and the Turkish proselytes of the
_Koran_. If the Christian apostles, St. Peter or St. Paul, could return
to the Vatican, they might possibly inquire the name of the deity who
is worshipped with such mysterious rites in that magnificent temple; at
Oxford or Geneva, they would experience less surprise, but it might still
be incumbent on them to peruse the catechism of the church and to study
the orthodox commentators on their own writings and the words of their
master. But the Turkish dome of St. Sophia, with an increase of splendour
and size, represents the humble tabernacle erected at Medina by the hands
of Mohammed. The Mohammedans have uniformly withstood the temptation
of reducing the object of their faith and devotion to a level with the
senses and imagination of man. “I believe in one God, and Mohammed the
apostle of God,” is the simple and invariable profession of Islam. The
intellectual image of the Deity has never been degraded by any visible
idol; the honours of the prophet have never transgressed the measure of
human virtue; and his living precepts have restrained the gratitude of
his disciples within the bounds of reason and religion. The votaries of
Ali have indeed consecrated the memory of their hero, his wife, and his
children, and some of the Persian doctors pretend that the divine essence
was incarnate in the person of the imams; but their superstition is
universally condemned by the Sunnites, and their impiety has afforded a
seasonable warning against the worship of saints and martyrs.
The metaphysical questions on the attributes of God and the liberty of
man have been agitated in the schools of the Mohammedans, as well as in
those of the Christians; but among the former they have never engaged
the passions of the people or disturbed the tranquillity of the state.
The cause of this important difference may be found in the separation
or union of the regal and sacerdotal characters. It was the interest
of the caliphs, the successors of the prophet and commanders of the
faithful, to repress and discourage all religious innovations; the
order, the discipline, the temporal and spiritual ambition of the clergy
are unknown to the Moslems, and the sages of the law are the guides of
their conscience and the oracles of their faith. From the Atlantic to
the Ganges the _Koran_ is acknowledged as the fundamental code, not
only of theology but of civil and criminal jurisprudence; and the laws
which regulate the actions and the property of mankind are guarded by
the infallible and immutable sanction of the will of God. This religious
servitude is attended with some practical disadvantage; the illiterate
legislator had been often misled by his own prejudices and those of his
country; and the institutions of the Arabian desert may be ill adapted to
the wealth and numbers of Ispahan and Constantinople. On these occasions,
the kadi respectfully places on his head the holy volume, and substitutes
a dexterous interpretation more apposite to the principles of equity and
the manners and policy of the times.
His beneficial or pernicious influence on the public happiness is the
last consideration in the character of Mohammed. The most bitter or most
bigoted of his Christian or Jewish foes will surely allow that he assumed
a false commission to inculcate a salutary doctrine, less perfect only
than their own. He piously supposed, as the basis of his religion, the
truth and sanctity of their prior revelations, the virtues and miracles
of their founders. The idols of Arabia were broken before the throne of
God; the blood of human victims was expiated by prayer, and fasting, and
alms, the laudable or innocent arts of devotion; and his rewards and
punishments of a future life were painted by the images most congenial
to an ignorant and carnal generation. Mohammed was, perhaps, incapable
of dictating a moral and political system for the use of his countrymen;
but he breathed among the faithful a spirit of charity and friendship,
recommended the practice of the social virtues, and checked, by his laws
and precepts, the thirst of revenge and the oppression of widow and
orphans. The hostile tribes were united in faith and obedience, and the
valour which had been idly spent in domestic quarrels was vigorously
directed against a foreign enemy. Had the impulse been less powerful,
Arabia, free at home and formidable abroad, might have flourished under a
succession of her native monarchs. Her sovereignty was lost by the extent
and rapidity of conquest. The colonies of the nation were scattered over
the East and West, and their blood was mingled with the blood of their
converts and captives. After the reign of three caliphs, the throne was
transported from Medina to the valley of Damascus and the banks of the
Tigris; the holy cities were violated by impious war; Arabia was ruled
by the rod of a subject, perhaps of a stranger; and the Bedouins of the
desert, awakening from their dream of dominion, resumed their old and
solitary independence.[d]
FOOTNOTES
[31] [Muir[e] and other accounts say that Hamza’s liver was cut out and
brought to Hind; this because he had slain her father at Bedr.]
[32] [The fortress.]
[33] [Dinar--a gold coin. Its original weight was 65.4 grains troy.]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
CHAPTER V. THE SPREAD OF ISLAM
ABU BEKR, FIRST CALIPH AFTER MOHAMMED
[Sidenote: [632-661 A.D.]]
Mohammed, the founder of the Saracenic empire, died at Medina, on Monday
the 8th of June, 632 A.D., being the twenty-second year of the reign of
Heraclius the Grecian emperor. After he was dead, the next care was to
appoint a successor; and it was indeed very necessary that one should be
provided as soon as possible. Their government and religion being both in
their infancy, and a great many of Mohammed’s followers no great bigots,
not having yet forgotten their ancient rights and customs, but rather
forced to leave them for fear, than upon any conviction, affairs were in
such a posture as could by no means admit of an interregnum. Wherefore
the same day that he expired the Mussulmans met together in order to
elect a caliph or successor. In that assembly there had like to have
been such a fray, as might, in all probability, have greatly endangered,
if not utterly ruined, this new religion and polity, had not Omar and
Abu Bekr timely interposed. For the prophet having left no positive
directions concerning a successor, or at least none that were known to
any but his wives, who in all probability might conceal them out of their
partiality in favour of Omar, a hot dispute arose between the inhabitants
of Mecca and Medina.
At last Omar being wearied out, and seeing no likelihood of deciding the
matter, was willing to give over, and bade Abu Bekr give him his hand,
which he had no sooner done than Omar promised him fealty. The rest
followed his example, and by the consent of both parties Abu Bekr was
at last saluted caliph, and being acknowledged the rightful successor
of their prophet Mohammed, became the absolute judge of all causes both
sacred and civil. Thus, after much ado, that difference was at last
composed, which had like to have proved fatal to Mohammedanism. And
certainly it was a very great oversight in Mohammed, in all the time of
his sickness, never to have named a successor positively and publicly.
If he had done so, without question, his authority would have determined
the business, and prevented that disturbance which had like to have
endangered the religion he had planted with so much difficulty and
hazard.
Now though the government was actually settled upon Abu Bekr, all parties
were not equally satisfied, for a great many were of opinion that the
right of succession belonged to Ali, the son of Abu Talib. Upon which
account the Mohammedans have ever since been divided; some maintaining
that Abu Bekr, and Omar, and Othman, that came after him, were the
rightful and lawful successors of the prophet; and others disclaiming
them altogether as usurpers, and constantly asserting the right of
Ali. Of the former opinion are the Turks at this day; of the latter,
the Persians. And such consequently is the difference between those
two nations, that notwithstanding their agreement in all other points
of their superstition, yet upon this account they treat one another
as most damnable heretics. Ali had this to recommend him, that he was
Mohammed’s cousin-german, and was the first that embraced his religion,
except his wife Khadija, and his slave Zaid, and was besides Mohammed’s
son-in-law, having married his daughter Fatima. Abu Bekr was Mohammed’s
father-in-law, by whom he was so much respected that he received from him
the surname of As-Siddik (which signifies in Arabic, “a great speaker of
truth”), because he resolutely asserted the truth of that story which
Mohammed told of his going one night to heaven.
Ali was not present at this election, and when he heard the news was not
well pleased, having hoped that the choice would have fallen on himself.
Abu Bekr sent Omar to Fatima’s house, where Ali and some of his friends
were, with orders to compel them by force to come in and do fealty to
him, if they would not be persuaded by fair means. Omar was just going to
fire the house, when Fatima asked him what he meant. He told her that he
would certainly burn the house down unless they would be content to do as
the rest of the people had done. Upon which Ali came forth and went to
Abu Bekr, and acknowledged his sovereignty.
Abu Bekr being thus settled in his new government, had work enough to
maintain it; for the Mohammedan religion had not as yet taken such
deep root in the hearts of men but that they would very willingly have
shaken it off had they known how. Accordingly the Arabians, a people of
a restless and turbulent disposition, did not neglect the opportunity
of rebelling, which they thought was fairly offered them by the death
of Mohammed. Immediately taking up arms, they refused to pay the usual
tribute, tithes, and alms, and no longer observed the rites and customs
which had been imposed upon them by Mohammed.
[Sidenote: [632-633 A.D.]]
Abu Bekr sent Khalid ben Walid, with an army of forty-five hundred men,
who, having routed them in a set battle, brought off a great deal of
plunder, and made slaves of their children.
Khalid was the best general of his age, and it was chiefly to his courage
and conduct that the Saracens owed the subduing of the rebels, the
conquest of Syria, and the establishment of their religion and polity.
His love and tenderness towards his own soldiers were only equalled
by his hatred and aversion to the enemies of the Mohammedan religion.
Of both he has given the most signal instances. To those who, having
embraced the Mohammedan religion, afterwards apostatised, he was an
irreconcilable and implacable foe; nor would he spare them, though they
evinced the greatest signs of unfeigned repentance. For his great valour,
the Arabs called him “the Sword of God”; which surname of his was known
also to his enemies, and is mentioned as well by Greek as Arab authors.
About this time several persons, perceiving the success and prosperity
of Mohammed and his followers, set up also for prophets too, in hope
of meeting the like good fortune, and making themselves eminent in the
world. Such were Aswad al-Ansi and Tulaihah ben Khuwailid, with several
others, whose attempts however quickly came to nothing. But the most
considerable of these impostors was Musailima, who had been the rival of
Mohammed even in his life-time, and trumped up a book in imitation of the
_Koran_. He had now gathered together a very considerable body of men
in Yemen, a province of Arabia, and began to be so formidable that the
Mussulmans began to feel alarmed at his growing greatness.
It is strange and surprising to consider from how mean and contemptible
beginnings the greatest things have been raised in a short time. Of this
the Saracenic empire is a remarkable instance. For if we look back but
eleven years, we shall see how Mohammed, unable to support his cause,
routed and oppressed by the powerful party of the Koreishites at Mecca,
fled with a few desponding followers to Medina to preserve his life no
less than his imposture. And now, within so short a period, we find the
undertakings of his successor prospering beyond expectation, and making
him the terror of all his neighbours; and the Saracens in a capacity not
only to keep possession of their own peninsula of Arabia, but to extend
their arms over larger territories than ever were subject to the Romans
themselves. Whilst they were thus employed in Arabia, they were little
regarded by the Grecian emperor, who awoke too late to a sense of their
formidable power, when he saw them pouring in upon them like a torrent,
and driving all before them. The proud Persian, too, who so very lately
had been domineering in Syria, and sacked Jerusalem and Damascus, must be
forced not only to part with his own dominions, but also to submit his
neck to the Saracenic yoke. It may be reasonably supposed that, had the
Grecian empire been in the flourishing condition it formerly was, the
Saracens might have been checked at least, if not entirely extinguished.
But besides that the western part of the empire had been rent from it by
the barbarous Goths, the eastern also had received so many shocks from
the Huns on the one side, and the Persians on the other, that it was not
in a situation to stem the fury of this powerful invasion. Heraclius,
indeed, was a prince of admirable courage and conduct, and did all
that was possible to restore the discipline of the army, and was very
successful against the Persians, not only driving them out of his own
dominions, but even wresting from them a part of their own territories.
But the empire seemed to labour under an incurable disease, and to be
wounded in its very vitals. No time could have been more fatally adverse
to its maintenance, nor more favourable to the enterprises of the
Saracens.
Abu Bekr had now set affairs at home in pretty good order. The apostates
who upon the death of Mohammed had revolted to the idolatry in which
they were born and bred, were again reduced to subjection. The forces of
Musailima, the false prophet, being dispersed and himself killed, there
was now little or nothing left to be done in Arabia. For though there
were a great many Christian Arabs, as particularly the tribe of Ghassan,
yet they were generally employed in the service of the Greek emperor.
The next business, therefore, that the caliph had to do, pursuant to
the tenor of his religion, was to make war upon his neighbours, for
the propagation of the truth (for so they call their superstition),
and compel them either to become Mohammedans or tributaries. For their
prophet Mohammed had given them a commission of a very large, nay,
unlimited extent, to fight, _viz._, till all the people were of his
religion. The wars which are entered upon in obedience to this command,
they call holy wars, with no greater absurdity than we ourselves give the
same title to that which was once undertaken against them by Europeans.
With this religious object, Abu Bekr sent at this time a force under
Khalid into Irak or Babylonia; but his greatest longing was after Syria,
which delicious, pleasant, and fruitful country being near to Arabia,
seemed to lie very conveniently for him.
[Sidenote: [633-634 A.D.]]
The news of his preparation quickly came to the ears of the emperor
Heraclius, who despatched a force with all possible speed to check the
advance of the Saracens, but with ill success; for the general, with
twelve hundred of his men, was killed upon the field of the battle, and
the rest routed, the Arabs losing only 120 men. A number of skirmishes
followed, in most of which the Christians came off the worst.[b]
Damascus was besieged for months, and all sorties of the inhabitants
crushed with heavy slaughter. Heraclius, at Antioch, sent a great army
under Werdan to its relief. Khalid, raising the siege, went to meet it.[a]
[Illustration: DAMASCUS]
The two armies presently came within sight of each other, and the
confidence of the Saracens was somewhat checked, when they perceived
the strength of the emperor’s forces, which amounted to no less than
seventy thousand. Those who had been in Persia, and seen the vast armies
of Chosroes, confessed that they had never beheld an enemy equal to the
present, either in number or military preparation. On the second morning
they moved forward, and engaged in all parts with all imaginable vigour.
The fight, or rather the slaughter, continued till evening. The Christian
army was entirely routed and defeated. The Saracens killed that day fifty
thousand men. Those that escaped fled, some of them to Cæsarea, others to
Damascus, and some to Antioch. The Saracens took plunder of inestimable
value, and a great many banners, and crosses made of gold and silver,
precious stones, silver and gold chains, rich clothes, and arms without
number; which Khalid said he would not divide until Damascus was taken.
The Saracens, returning to Damascus, continued vigorously to press the
siege, and reduced the inhabitants to very great straits, who every day
made a worse defence. For a while, at last, they begged of Khalid to
stay the assault, that they might have a little time to deliberate. But
he turned a deaf ear to them, for he had rather take the town by force,
and put the inhabitants to the sword, and let his Saracens have the
plunder, than that they should surrender, and have security for their
lives and their property. At length, through treachery, Khalid entered at
the east gate with his Saracens, putting all to the sword, and Christian
blood streamed down the streets of Damascus.
Abu Bekr the caliph died the same day that Damascus was taken,[34] which
was on Friday, the 23rd of August, 634 A.D. There are various reports
concerning his death; some say that he was poisoned by the Jews, eating
rice with Harith ben Kaldah, and that they both died of it within a
twelvemonth after. But Aisha says, that he bathed himself upon a cold
day, which threw him into a fever[35] of which he died within fifteen
days.[b]
Abu Bekr particularly lamented the number of the prophet’s companions
that fell in these campaigns, and fearing that the revelations of
Mohammed might be dispersed and lost, he gave orders that they should be
collected into the _Koran_. We shall later have occasion to notice the
slovenly manner in which the persons employed performed their task; the
compilation was subsequently revised in the reign of the caliph Othman,
and it is probable that there are many passages far different from those
which Mohammed wrote.
When all things were ready, the caliph reviewed the troops and issued
that celebrated code of regulations for the conduct of the army; it
was addressed to the general Abu Sufyan, and contained the following
directions: “Take care to treat your men with tenderness and lenity.
Consult with your officers upon all pressing occasions, and encourage
them to face the enemy with bravery and resolution. If you are
victorious, spare all the aged, the women, and the children. Neither
cut down palm trees nor burn any fields of corn. Spare all fruit trees;
slay no cattle but such as are required for your own use. Adhere to your
engagements inviolably; spare the inhabitants of monasteries; desecrate
no houses of religious worship. Cleave the skulls of those members of the
synagogue of Satan, who shave their crowns, give them no quarter, unless
they embrace Islamism, or pay tribute.”
The character of the first caliph had a beneficial effect on the
Mohammedan religion; for though the partisans of Ali accuse him of
ambition, and of uniting with his daughter Aisha to suppress the
prophet’s declarations in favour of Ali, yet they do not deny him the
praise of disinterestedness, justice, and benevolence. Before his
accession, he had bestowed the greater part of his estate to feed the
poor, and had been publicly named by the prophet the most charitable of
men. When placed at the head of affairs, he only took from the treasury
the sum absolutely necessary for his daily support; before entering on
the sovereignty, he ordered an exact account to be taken of his personal
estate, and at his death it was found to be considerably diminished.
In fact the absolute ruler of the richest countries of the world left
behind him but a single camel and an Ethiopian slave, and even these
he bequeathed to his successor. He dictated his will to Othman in the
following terms: “_In the Name of the Most Merciful God._--This is
the last will and testament of Abu Bekr ben Abi Kohafa, when he was
in the last hour of this world, and the first of the next; an hour in
which the infidel must believe, the wicked be convinced of their evil
ways, and liars speak the truth. I nominate Omar ben al-Khattab my
successor; therefore, hearken to him, and obey him. If he acts right, he
will confirm my expectations; if otherwise, he must render an account
of his own actions. My intentions are good, but I cannot foresee the
future results. However, those who do ill shall render a severe account
hereafter. Fare-ye-well. May ye be ever attended by the divine favour and
blessing.” When Abu Bekr had concluded this dictation, he fainted; on his
recovery, he desired Othman to read the document, soon after which he
expired. When information of the event was brought to Omar, he exclaimed,
“The life of Abu Bekr has been such, that it will be impossible for those
who come after, to imitate his sublime example.” Two proverbs attributed
to him, deserve to be quoted: “Good actions are a sure protection against
the blows of adversity.”--“Death is the most difficult of all things
before it comes, and the easiest when it is past.”
THE CALIPH OMAR
[Sidenote: [634-644 A.D.]]
Omar was, like his predecessor, a native of Mecca; he had been originally
a camel-herd, and never became quite free from the coarseness and
rusticity incident to his humble origin. At first a zealous idolater,
he proposed to extirpate all the followers of Mohammed; when he became
afterwards a Mussulman, he was just as eager to massacre all who would
not believe in the prophet. Violent on every occasion, he breathed
nothing but slaughter; and countless anecdotes are related of his
unrelenting temper. One of these must suffice. A Mussulman having a suit
against a Jew, was condemned by Mohammed, and in consequence, carried
his appeal before the tribunal of Omar; scarcely had he stated his case,
when Omar, springing from his seat, struck the appellant dead with one
blow of his sabre, exclaiming, “So perish all who will not submit to the
decision of God’s chosen prophet.” Rigorous justice, as interpreted by
the Mohammedan laws, and extreme severity, rendered his character more
respected than beloved. Mohammed said of him, “Truth speaks by the mouth
of Omar.” He added, that “if God had to send another prophet on the
earth, Omar would be the object of his choice.”
When Abu Bekr informed Omar that he had chosen him as his successor,
Omar, with mingled pride and humility, answered, “I have no need of
the caliphate.” Abu Bekr replied, “But the caliphate has need of you,”
and thus removed all further scruple. On his accession, he called
himself the “Caliph of the Caliph of God’s apostle,” but finding the
title inconveniently long, he changed it into that of “Commander of the
Faithful”; and this became, subsequently, the favourite designation of
his successors. When first he addressed his subjects, he stood a step
lower on the pulpit than Abu Bekr had been accustomed to do; he informed
his hearers that he would not have undertaken the arduous task of
government, only that he reposed perfect confidence in their intention to
observe the law, and adhere to the pure faith; he concluded with these
remarkable words, “O Mussulmans, I take God to witness, that none of you
shall be too strong for me to sacrifice the rights of the weak, nor too
weak for me to neglect the rights of the strong.”
No sooner was Omar placed at the head of affairs than the armies of
the Mohammedans seemed to have acquired tenfold vigour; and this was
not diminished by the severe treatment which the gallant Khalid, for a
trivial offence, received from the jealous caliph. The greater part of
Syria and Mesopotamia had been subdued during the life of Abu Bekr, the
conquest of these countries was now completed; the ancient empire of the
Persians was overthrown at the battle of Kadisiya; Palestine, Phœnicia,
and Egypt submitted to the Saracen yoke almost without a struggle; and
the standard of the prophet floated in triumph from the sands of the
Cyrenian desert to the banks of the Indus. “During the reign of Omar,”
says Khondemir, “the Saracens conquered thirty-six thousand cities,
towns, and castles, destroyed four thousand Christian, Magian, and pagan
temples, and erected fourteen hundred mosques.”
The annals of the world present no parallel to this recital; the Arabs
were animated by an enthusiasm which made them despise the most fearful
odds; they had ever in their mouths the magnificent orientalism,
traditionally ascribed to Mohammed, “in the shades of the scymitars is
paradise prefigured”; they sought battle as a feast, and counted danger
a sport. A fiercer spirit of course displayed itself in the Mohammedan
creed; the sanguinary precepts of propagandism, to which the prophet had
given utterance after his power was established at Medina, quite obscured
the milder doctrine taught at Mecca; and even these were surpassed in
ferocity by traditions which some of the sterner enthusiasts declared
that they had derived from the prophet himself. Abu Horeira declared
that he heard from Mohammed, “He who shall die without having fought for
God, or who never proposed that duty to himself, verily consigns himself
to destruction by his hypocrisy,” and also the singular declaration,
“He who shall bestow a horse upon one who would enlist himself under
the banner of the Most High, and be one who has faith in God and in his
promises, surely, both the food of that horse and the sustenance of his
rider, with the ordure of the former, shall be placed in the scales for
his advantage on the day of judgment.” We shall add one more, preserved
on the authority of Ibn Abbas: “There are two descriptions of eyes which
the fire of hell shall not destroy; the eyes that weep in contemplating
the indignation of God, and the eyes which are closed when in the act of
combat for the cause of God.”[f]
THE CONQUEST OF PERSIA
From the rapid conquests of the Saracens a presumption will naturally
arise, that the first caliphs commanded in person the armies of the
faithful, and sought the crown of martyrdom in the foremost ranks of the
battle. The courage of Abu Bekr, Omar, and Othman had indeed been tried
in the persecution and wars of the prophet; and the personal assurance of
paradise must have taught them to despise the pleasures and dangers of
the present world. But they ascended the throne in a venerable or mature
age, and esteemed the domestic cares of religion and justice the most
important duties of a sovereign. Except the presence of Omar at the siege
of Jerusalem, their longest expeditions were the frequent pilgrimage from
Medina to Mecca; and they calmly received the tidings of victory as they
prayed or preached before the sepulchre of the prophet.
In the sloth and vanity of the palace of Damascus, the succeeding princes
of the house of Omayyah were alike destitute of the qualifications
of statesmen and of saints. Yet the spoils of unknown nations were
continually laid at the foot of their throne, and the uniform ascent of
the Arabian greatness must be ascribed to the spirit of the nation rather
than the abilities of their chiefs. A large deduction must be allowed
for the weakness of their enemies. The birth of Mohammed was fortunately
placed in the most degenerate and disorderly period of the Persians, the
Romans, and the barbarians of Europe; the empires of Trajan, or even of
Constantine or Charlemagne, would have repelled the assault of the naked
Saracens, and the torrent of fanaticism might have been obscurely lost in
the sands of Arabia.
In the victorious days of the Roman republic, it had been the aim
of the senate to confine their consuls and legions to a single war,
and completely to suppress a first enemy before they provoked the
hostilities of a second. These timid maxims of policy were disdained
by the magnanimity or enthusiasm of the Arabian caliphs. With the same
vigour and success they invaded the successors of Augustus, and those
of Artaxerxes; and the rival monarchies at the same instant became the
prey of an enemy whom they had been so long accustomed to despise. One
hundred years after Mohammed’s flight from Mecca, the arms and the reign
of his successors extended from India to the Atlantic Ocean, over the
various and distant provinces which may be comprised under the names of,
(1) Persia; (2) Syria; (3) Egypt; (4) Africa; and (5) Spain. Under this
general division we may proceed to unfold these memorable transactions;
despatching with brevity the remote and less interesting conquests of
the East, and reserving a fuller narrative for those domestic countries,
which had been included within the pale of the Roman Empire.
[Illustration: PERSIAN WARRIOR OF THE MIDDLE AGES]
[Sidenote: [634-637 A.D.]]
In the first year of the first caliph, his lieutenant Khalid, the sword
of God, and the scourge of the infidels, advanced to the banks of the
Euphrates, and reduced the cities of Anbar and Hira. Westward of the
ruins of Babylon a tribe of sedentary Arabs had fixed themselves on the
verge of the desert; and Hira was the seat of a race of kings who had
embraced the Christian religion, and reigned above six hundred years
under the shadow of the throne of Persia. The last of the Mondars was
defeated and slain by Khalid; his son was sent a captive to Medina; his
nobles bowed before the successor of the prophet; the people were tempted
by the example and success of their countrymen; and the caliph accepted
as the first-fruits of foreign conquest, an annual tribute of seventy
thousand pieces of gold. The conquerors, and even their historians, were
astonished by the dawn of their future greatness.
The indignation and fears of the Persians suspended for a moment
their intestine divisions. By the unanimous sentence of the priests
and nobles, Queen Azarmidokht was deposed--the sixth of the transient
usurpers who had arisen and vanished in three or four years, since the
death of Chosroes and the retreat of Heraclius. Her tiara was placed
on the head of Yezdegerd, the grandson of Chosroes; and the same era,
which coincides with an astronomical period, has recorded the fall of
the Sassanian dynasty and the religion of Zoroaster. The youth and
inexperience of the prince--he was only fifteen years of age--declined a
perilous encounter; the royal standard was delivered into the hands of
his general Rustem; and a remnant of thirty thousand regular troops was
swelled in truth, or in opinion, to 120,000 subjects, or allies, of the
great king. The Moslems, whose numbers were reinforced from twelve to
thirty thousand, had pitched their camp in the plains of Kadesiya; and
their line, though it consisted of fewer men, could produce more soldiers
than the unwieldy host of the infidels. The periods of the battle of
Kadesiya were distinguished by their peculiar appellations. The first,
from the well-timed appearance of six thousand of the Syrian brethren,
was denominated the day of succour. The day of concussion might express
the disorder of one, or perhaps of both, of the contending armies. The
third, a nocturnal tumult, received the whimsical name of the night
of barking, from the discordant clamours, which were compared to the
inarticulate sounds of the fiercest animals.
The morning of the succeeding day determined the fate of Persia; and
a seasonable whirlwind drove a cloud of dust against the faces of the
unbelievers. The clangour of arms was re-echoed to the tent of Rustem,
who, far unlike the ancient hero of his name, was gently reclining in a
cool and tranquil shade, amidst the baggage of his camp, and the train
of mules that was laden with gold and silver. On the sound of danger he
started from his couch; but his flight was overtaken by a valiant Arab,
who caught him by the foot, struck off his head, hoisted it on a lance,
and instantly returning to the field of battle, carried slaughter and
dismay among the thickest ranks of the Persians. The Saracens confess a
loss of 7,500 men; and the battle of Kadesiya is justly described by the
epithets of obstinate and atrocious. The standard of the monarchy was
overthrown and captured in the field--a leathern apron of a blacksmith,
who, in ancient times, had arisen the deliverer of Persia; but this
badge of heroic poverty was disguised, and almost concealed, by a
profusion of precious gems. After this victory, the wealthy province of
Irak or Assyria submitted to the caliph, and his conquests were firmly
established by the speedy foundation of Bassora, a place which ever
commands the trade and navigation of the Persians.
[Sidenote: [637-651 A.D.]]
After the defeat of Kadesiya, a country intersected by rivers and canals
might have opposed an insuperable barrier to the victorious cavalry; and
the walls of Ctesiphon or Madain, which had resisted the battering-rams
of the Romans, would not have yielded to the darts of the Saracens. But
the flying Persians were overcome by the belief that the last day of
their religion and empire was at hand; the strongest posts were abandoned
by treachery or cowardice; and the king, with a part of his family and
treasures, escaped to Holwan at the foot of the Median hills. In the
third month after the battle, Said, the lieutenant of Omar, passed the
Tigris without opposition; the capital was taken by assault; and the
disorderly resistance of the people gave a keener edge to the sabres of
the Moslems, who shouted with religious transport, “This is the white
palace of Chosroes, this is the promise of the apostle of God!” The
naked robbers of the desert were suddenly enriched beyond the measure of
their hope or knowledge. Each chamber revealed a new treasure secreted
with art, or ostentatiously displayed; the gold and silver, the various
wardrobes and precious furniture, surpassed (says Abulfeda) the estimate
of fancy or numbers; and another historian defines the untold and
almost infinite mass by the fabulous computation of three thousands
of thousands of thousands of pieces of gold. The sack of Ctesiphon was
followed by its desertion and gradual decay. The Saracens disliked the
air and situation of the place, and Omar was advised by his general to
remove the seat of government to the western side of the Euphrates.
In every age the foundation and ruin of the Assyrian cities has been easy
and rapid; the country is destitute of stone and timber, and the most
solid structures are composed of bricks baked in the sun, and joined by
a cement of the native bitumen. After the loss of the battle of Jalula,
Yezdegerd fled from Holwan, and concealed his shame and despair in the
mountains of Farsistan, from whence Cyrus had descended with his equal
and valiant companions. The courage of the nation survived that of the
monarch; among the hills to the south of Ecbatana or Hamadan, 150,000
Persians made a third and final stand for their religion and country; and
the decisive battle of Nehavend was styled by the Arabs the “victory of
victories” (641).
The geography of Persia is darkly delineated by the Greeks and Latins;
but the most illustrious of her cities appear to be more ancient than
the invasion of the Arabs. By the reduction of Hamadan and Ispahan, of
Caswin, Tabriz, and Rei, they gradually approached the shores of the
Caspian Sea; and the orators of Mecca might applaud the success and
spirit of the faithful, who had already lost sight of the Northern Bear,
and had almost transcended the bounds of the habitable world. Again
turning towards the west and the Roman Empire, they repassed the Tigris
over the bridge of Mosul, and, in the captive provinces of Armenia and
Mesopotamia, embraced their victorious brethren of the Syrian army.
From the palace of Madain their eastern progress was not less rapid
or extensive. They advanced along the Tigris and the gulf; penetrated
through the passes of the mountains into the valley of Estachar or
Persepolis; and profaned the last sanctuary of the Magian empire. The
grandson of Chosroes was nearly surprised among the falling columns
and mutilated figures; a sad emblem of the past and present fortune
of Persia; he fled with accelerated haste over the desert of Kirman,
implored the aid of the warlike Segestans, and sought an humble refuge
on the verge of the Turkish and Chinese power. But a victorious army is
insensible of fatigue; the Arabs divided their forces in the pursuit of a
timorous enemy; and the caliph Othman promised the government of Khorasan
to the first general who should enter that large and populous country,
the kingdom of the ancient Bactrians. The condition was accepted; the
prize was deserved; the standard of Mohammed was planted on the walls
of Herat, Merou, and Balkh; and the successful leader neither halted
nor reposed till his foaming cavalry had tasted the waters of the Oxus.
In the public anarchy, the independent governors of the cities and
castles obtained their separate capitulations; the terms were granted or
imposed by the esteem, the prudence, or the compassion of the victors;
and a simple profession of faith established the distinction between a
brother and a slave. The administration of Persia was regulated by an
actual survey of the people, the cattle, and the fruits of the earth; and
this monument, which attests the vigilance of the caliphs, might have
instructed the philosophers of every age.
The flight of Yezdegerd had carried him beyond the Oxus, and as far as
the Jaxartes, two rivers of ancient and modern renown, which descend
from the mountains of India towards the Caspian Sea. He was hospitably
entertained by Tarkhan, prince of Fergana, a fertile province on the
Jaxartes; the king of Samarcand, with the Turkish tribes of Sogdiana
and Scythia, were moved by the lamentations and promises of the fallen
monarch; and he solicited by a suppliant embassy, the more solid and
powerful friendship of the emperor of China. The virtuous Taitsong,
the first of the dynasty of the Tang, may be justly compared with the
Antonines of Rome. His people enjoyed the blessings of prosperity
and peace, and his dominion was acknowledged by forty-four hordes of
the barbarians of Tartary. His last garrisons of Cashgar and Khoten
maintained a frequent intercourse with their neighbours of the Jaxartes
and Oxus; a recent colony of Persians had introduced into China the
astronomy of the magi; and Taitsong might be alarmed by the rapid
progress and dangerous vicinity of the Arabs. The influence and perhaps
the supplies of China revived the hopes of Yezdegerd and the zeal of
the worshippers of the fire; and he returned with an army of Turks to
conquer the inheritance of his fathers. The fortunate Moslems, without
unsheathing their swords, were the spectators of his ruin and death.
The grandson of Chosroes was betrayed by his servant, insulted by the
seditious inhabitants of Merou, and oppressed, defeated, and pursued by
his barbarian allies. He reached the banks of a river, and offered his
rings and bracelets for an instant passage in a miller’s boat. Ignorant
or insensible of royal distress, the rustic replied, that four drachms of
silver were the daily profit of his mill, and that he would not suspend
his work unless the loss were repaid. In this moment of hesitation and
delay, the last of the Sassanian kings was overtaken and slaughtered by
the Turkish cavalry in the nineteenth year of his unhappy reign. His son
Firuz, an humble client of the Chinese emperor, accepted the station of
captain of his guards; and the magian worship was long preserved by a
colony of loyal exiles in the province of Bokhara. His grandson inherited
the regal name; but after a faint and fruitless enterprise, he returned
to China and ended his days in the palace of Sigan. The male line of the
Sassanids was extinct; but the female captives, the daughters of Persia,
were given to the conquerors in servitude, or marriage; and the race of
the caliphs and imams was ennobled by the blood of their royal mothers.
After the fall of the Persian kingdom, the river Oxus divided the
territories of the Saracens and of the Turks. This narrow boundary was
soon overleaped by the spirit of the Arabs; the governors of Khorasan
extended their successive inroads; and one of their triumphs was
adorned with the buskin of a Turkish queen, which she dropped in her
precipitate flight beyond the hills of Bokhara. But the final conquest
of Transoxiana, as well as of Spain, was reserved for the glorious
reign of the inactive Walid; and the name of Katiba, the camel driver,
declares the origin and merit of his successful lieutenant. While one
of his colleagues displayed the first Mohammedan banner on the banks
of the Indus, the spacious regions between the Oxus, the Jaxartes, and
the Caspian Sea, were reduced by the arms of Katiba to the obedience of
the prophet, and of the caliph. A tribute of two millions of pieces of
gold was imposed on the infidels; their idols were burned or broken; the
Mussulman chief pronounced a sermon in the new mosque of Khwarizm; after
several battles, the Turkish hordes were driven back to the desert; and
the emperors of China solicited the friendship of the victorious Arabs.
Before the invasion of the Saracens, Khwarizm, Bokhara and Samarcand
were rich and populous under the yoke of the shepherds of the north. The
mutual wants of India and Europe were supplied by the diligence of the
Sogdian merchants; and the inestimable art of transforming linen into
paper, has been transferred from the manufacture of Samarcand over the
western world.
THE SYRIAN CONQUEST COMPLETED
[Sidenote: [636-637 A.D.]]
From the conquest of Damascus the Saracens proceeded to Heliopolis and
Emesa. In the prosecution of the war, their policy was not less effectual
than their sword. By short and separate truces they dissolved the union
of the enemy; accustomed the Syrians to compare their friendship with
their enmity; familiarised the idea of their language, religion, and
manners; and exhausted, by clandestine purchase, the magazines and
arsenals of the cities which they returned to besiege. They aggravated
the ransom of the more wealthy or the more obstinate; and Chalcis
alone was taxed at five thousand ounces of gold, five thousand ounces
of silver, two thousand robes of silk, and as many figs and olives as
would load five thousand asses. But the terms of truce or capitulation
were faithfully observed; and the lieutenant of the caliph, who had
promised not to enter the walls of the captive Baalbec, remained tranquil
and immovable in his tent till the jarring factions solicited the
interposition of a foreign master. The conquest of the plain and valley
of Syria was achieved in less than two years. Yet the commander of the
faithful reproved the slowness of their progress, and the Saracens,
bewailing their fault with tears of rage and repentance, called aloud on
their chiefs to lead them forth to fight the battles of the Lord.
[Illustration: SARACENIC GLAZED JUG AND LAMP]
It was incumbent on the Saracens to exert the full powers of their valour
and enthusiasm against the forces of the emperor, who was taught by
repeated losses, that the rovers of the desert had undertaken, and would
speedily achieve, a regular and permanent conquest. From the provinces
of Europe and Asia, fourscore thousand soldiers were transported by sea
and land to Antioch and Cæsarea; the light troops of the army consisted
of sixty thousand Christian Arabs of the tribes of Ghassan. In the
neighbourhood of Bosra, the springs of Mount Hermon descend in a torrent
to the plain of Decapolis, or ten cities; and the Hieromax, a name which
has been corrupted to Yermuk, is lost after a short course in the lake
of Tiberias. The banks of this obscure stream were illustrated by a long
and bloody encounter. On this momentous occasion, the public voice, and
the modesty of Abu Obaidah, restored the command to the most deserving of
the Moslems. Khalid assumed his station in the front, his colleague was
posted in the rear, that the disorder of the fugitives might be checked
by his venerable aspect and the sight of the yellow banner which Mohammed
had displayed before the walls of Khaibar.
The last line was occupied by the sister of Derar, with the Arabian women
who had enlisted in this holy war, who were accustomed to wield the bow
and the lance, and who in a moment of captivity had defended, against the
uncircumcised ravishers, their chastity and religion. The exhortation
of the generals was brief and forcible: “Paradise is before you, the
devil and hell-fire in your rear.” Yet such was the weight of the Roman
cavalry, that the right wing of the Arabs was broken and separated from
the main body. Thrice did they retreat in disorder, and thrice were they
driven back to the charge by the reproaches and blows of the women. Four
thousand and thirty of the Moslems were buried in the field of battle;
and the skill of the Armenian archers enabled seven hundred to boast that
they had lost an eye in that meritorious service. The veterans of the
Syrian war acknowledged that it was the hardest and most doubtful of the
days which they had seen. But it was likewise the most decisive; many
thousands of the Greeks and Syrians fell by the swords of the Arabs; many
were slaughtered, after the defeat, in the woods and mountains; many, by
mistaking the ford, were drowned in the waters of the Yermuk; and however
the loss may be magnified, the Christian writers confess and bewail the
bloody punishment of their sins.
After the battle of Yermuk, the Roman army no longer appeared in the
field; and the Saracens might securely choose, among the fortified towns
of Syria, the first object of their attack. They consulted the caliph
whether they should march to Cæsarea or Jerusalem; and the advice of Ali
determined the immediate siege of the latter. To a profane eye, Jerusalem
was the first or second capital of Palestine; but after Mecca and Medina,
it was revered and visited by the devout Moslems, as the temple of the
Holy Land, which had been sanctified by the revelation of Moses, of
Jesus, and of Mohammed himself.
The siege of Jerusalem lasted four months; not a day was lost without
some action of sally or assault; the military engines incessantly
played from the ramparts; and the inclemency of the winter was still
more painful and destructive to the Arabs. The Christians yielded at
length to the perseverance of the besiegers. The patriarch Sophronius
appeared on the walls, and by the voice of an interpreter demanded a
conference. After a vain attempt to dissuade the lieutenant of the caliph
from his impious enterprise, he proposed, in the name of the people, a
fair capitulation, with this extraordinary clause, that the articles
of security should be ratified by the authority and presence of Omar
himself. The question was debated in the council of Medina; the sanctity
of the place, and the advice of Ali, persuaded the caliph to gratify the
wishes of his soldiers and enemies, and the simplicity of Omar’s journey
is more illustrious than the royal pageants of vanity and oppression. The
conqueror of Persia and Syria was mounted on a red camel, which carried,
besides his person, a bag of corn, a bag of dates, a wooden dish, and
a leathern bottle of water. By his command the ground of the temple
of Solomon was prepared for the foundation of a mosque; and, during a
residence of ten days, he regulated the present and future state of his
Syrian conquests. Medina might be jealous, lest the caliph should be
detained by the sanctity of Jerusalem or the beauty of Damascus; her
apprehensions were dispelled by his prompt and voluntary return to the
tomb of the apostle.