BOOK VIII

PROGRESS CONTAINED IN THE COUP D'ÉTAT

I

THE QUANTUM OF GOOD CONTAINED IN EVIL

Among us democrats, many well-meaning minds were stupefied by the event

of the 2nd of December. It disconcerted some, discouraged others, and

terrified many. I have seen some who cried: _Finis Poloniae_. As for

myself, since at certain times I am obliged to say, I, and to speak in

the face of history as a witness, I proclaim that I saw that event

without perturbation. I say more than this, that at times, in the face

of the 2nd of December, I declare myself satisfied.

When I can abstract myself from the present, when for a moment I can

turn my eyes away from all the crimes, from all the blood spilt, from

all the victims, from all the proscribed, from those hulks that echo

the death rattle, from those deadful penal settlements of Lambessa and

Cayenne, where death is swift, from that exile where death is slow,

from this vote, from this oath, from this vast stain of shame inflicted

upon France, which is growing wider and wider each day; when,

forgetting for a few moments these painful thoughts, the usual

obsession of my mind, I succeed in confining myself within the severe

calmness of the politician, and in considering, not the fact, but the

consequences of the fact; then, among many results, disastrous beyond

doubt, a considerable, real, enormous progress becomes manifest to me,

and, from that moment, while I am still of those whom the 2nd of

December exasperates, I am no longer of those whom it afflicts.

Fixing my eyes upon certain points in the future, I say to myself: "The

deed was infamous, but the result is good."

Attempts have been made to explain the inexplicable victory of the

_coup d'état_ in a hundred ways. A true balance has been struck

between all possible resistances, and they are neutralized one by the

other: the people were afraid of the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie were

afraid of the people;--the faubourgs hesitated before the restoration

of the majority, fearing, wrongfully however, that their victory would

bring back to power that Right which is so thoroughly unpopular; the

shopocracy recoiled before the red republic; the people did not

understand; the middle classes shuffled; some said, "Whom shall we send

to the legislative palace?" others: "whom are we going to see at the

Hotel de Ville?" In fine, the rude repression of 1848, the insurrection

crushed by cannon-shot, the quarries, the casements, and the

transportations--a living and terrible recollection;--and then--Suppose

some one had succeeded in beating the call to arms! Suppose a single

legion had sallied forth! Suppose M. Sibour had been M. Affre, and had

thrown himself in the midst of the bullets of the pretorians! Suppose

the High Court had not suffered itself to be driven away by a corporal!

Suppose the judges had followed the example of the representatives, and

we had seen the scarlet gowns on the barricades, as we saw the scarfs!

Suppose a single arrest had miscarried! Suppose a single regiment had

hesitated! Suppose the massacre on the boulevards had not taken place,

or had turned out ill for Louis Bonaparte! etc., etc., etc. This is all

true, and yet what has been, was what was to be. Let us say again,

under the shadow of that monstrous victory vast and definitive progress

is taking place. The 2nd of December succeeded, because in more than

one point of view, I repeat, it was good that it should succeed. All

explanations are just, but all are vain. The invisible hand is mingled

in all this. Louis Bonaparte committed the crime; Providence brought

about the result.

In truth, it was essential that _order_ should come to the end of

its logic. It was essential that people should learn, and should learn

for all time, that, in the mouths of the men of the past, that word

_order_ signifies false oaths, perjury, pillage of the public cash-box,

civil war, courts-martial, confiscation, sequestration, deportation,

transportation, proscription, fusillades, police, censorship,

degradation of the army, disregard of the people, debasement of France,

a dumb Senate, the tribune overthrown, the press suppressed, a political

guillotine, murder of liberty, garroting of the right, violation of

laws, sovereignty of the sword, massacre, treason, ambuscades. The

spectacle that we have before our eyes is a profitable spectacle. What

we see in France since the 2nd of December is the debauch of order.

Yes, the hand of Providence is in it. Reflect, too, upon this: for

fifty years the Republic and the Empire have filled men's imaginations,

the one with its souvenirs of terror, the other with its souvenirs of

glory. Of the Republic men saw only 1793, that is to say, the terrible

revolutionary necessity,--the furnace; of the Empire they saw only

Austerlitz. Hence a prejudice against the Republic, and prestige for

the Empire. Now, what is the future of France to be? is it the Empire?

No, it is the Republic.

It became necessary to reverse that situation, to suppress the prestige

of that which cannot be restored, and to suppress the prejudice against

that which must be. Providence did it: it destroyed those two mirages.

February came and took away from the Republic its terror; Louis

Bonaparte came and deprived the Empire of its prestige. Henceforth,

1848, fraternity, is superimposed upon 1793, terror; Napoleon the

Little is superimposed upon Napoleon the Great. The two grand things,

one of which alarmed and the other dazzled, are receding. We perceive

'93 only through its justification, and Napoleon only through his

caricature; the foolish fear of the guillotine vanishes, the empty

imperial popularity disappears. Thanks to 1848, the Republic no longer

terrifies; thanks to Louis Bonaparte, the Empire no longer fascinates.

The future has become possible. These are the secrets of the Almighty!

But the word republic is not sufficient; it is the _thing_ republic

that is wanting; well, we shall have the thing with the word. Let us

develop this thought.

II

THE FOUR INSTITUTIONS THAT STAND OPPOSED TO THE REPUBLIC

Awaiting the marvellous but tardy simplifications which the union of

Europe and the democratic federation of the continent will some day

bring forth, what will be in France, the form of the social edifice, of

whose ill-defined and luminous outlines the thinking man already has a

glimpse, through the darkness of dictatorships?

That form is this:--

The sovereign commune, ruled by an elective mayor; universal suffrage

everywhere, subordinate to the national unity only in respect to acts

of general concern; so much for the administration. Syndics and upright

men arranging the private differences of associations and industries;

the jury, magistrate of the fact, enlightening the judge, magistrate of

the law; elective judges; so much for justice. The priest excluded from

everything except the church, living with his eye fixed on his book and

on Heaven, a stranger to the budget, unknown to the state, known only

to his flock, no longer possessing authority, but possessing liberty;

so much for religion. War confined to the defence of the territory. The

whole nation constituting a national guard, divided into three

districts, and able to rise as one man; so much for power. The law for

ever, the right for ever, the ballot for ever, the sword nowhere.

Now, what were the obstacles to this future, to this magnificent

realization of the democratic ideal?

There were four material obstacles, namely:--

The standing army.

Centralized administration.

The office-holding clergy.

The irremovable magistracy.

III

SLOW MOVEMENT OF NORMAL PROGRESS

What these four obstacles are, what they were even under the Republic

of February, even under the Constitution of 1848; the evil they

produced, the good they prevented, what sort of past they perpetuated,

what excellent social order they postponed, the publicist saw, the

philosopher knew, the nation did not know.

These four institutions, immense, ancient, solid, supported one upon

another, composite at their base and summit, growing like a hedge of

tall old trees, their roots under our feet, their branches over our

heads, smothered and crushed on all sides the scattered germs of the

new France. Where life and movement, association, local liberty,

communal initiative should have been, there was administrative

despotism; where there should have been the intelligent vigilance,

armed at need, of the patriot and the citizen, there was the passive

obedience of the soldier; where the quick Christian faith should have

gushed forth, there was the Catholic priest; where there should have

been justice, there was the judge. And the future was there, under the

feet of suffering generations, which could not rise and were waiting.

Was this known among the people? Was it suspected? Was it divined?

No!

Far from it. In the eyes of the greater part, and of the middle classes

in particular, these four obstacles were four buttresses. Army,

magistracy, administration, clergy, these were the four virtues of

order, the four social powers, the four sacred pillars of the old

French structure.

Attack that, if you dare!

I have no hesitation is saying, that in the state of blindness in which

are plunged the best minds, with the measured march of normal progress,

with our assemblies, of which I shall not be suspected to be the

detractor, but which, when they are both honest and timid, as is often

the case, are disposed to be led only by their average men, that is, by

mediocrity; with the committees of initiative, their delays and

ballottings, if the 2nd of December had not brought its overwhelming

demonstration, if Providence had not taken a hand, France would have

remained condemned for an indefinite term to its irremovable

magistracy, to administrative centralization, to the standing army, and

to the office-holding clergy.

Surely, the power of the tribune and of the press combined, these two

great forces of civilization,--it is not I who seek to deny or belittle

them; but see how many efforts of all kinds it would have required, in

every direction, and under every form, by the tribune and by the

newspaper, by the book and by the spoken word, to succeed even in

shaking the universal prejudice in favor of these four fatal

institutions! How many to succeed in overthrowing them! to exhibit the

evidence to the eyes of all, to overcome selfish, passionate or

unintelligent resistance, thoroughly to enlighten public opinion, the

consciences of the people, and the ruling powers, to cause this

fourfold reform to force its way first into ideas, then into the laws.

Reckon up the speeches, the writings, the newspaper articles, the

projects of laws, the counter-projects, the amendments, the amendments

to amendments, the reports, the counter-reports, the facts, the

incidents, the polemics, the discussions, the assertions, the denials,

the storms, the steps forward, the steps backward, the days, the weeks,

the months, the years, the quarter-century, the half-century!

IV

WHAT AN ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE DONE

I imagine, on the benches of an assembly, the most intrepid of

thinkers, a brilliant mind, one of those men who, when they ascend the

tribune, feel it beneath them like the tripod of the oracle, suddenly

grow in stature and become colossal, surpass by a head the massive

appearances that mask reality, and see clearly the future over the

high, frowning wall of the present. That man, that orator, that seer,

seeks to warn his country; that prophet seeks to enlighten statesmen;

he knows where the breakers are; he knows that society will crumble by

means of these four false supports: centralized government, standing

army, irremovable judges, salaried priesthood; he knows it, he desires

that all should know it, he ascends the tribune and says:--

"I denounce to you four great public perils. Your political system

bears that within it that will destroy it. It is incumbent upon you to

transform your government root and branch, the army, the clergy, and

the magistracy: to suppress here, retrench there, remodel everything,

or perish through these four institutions, which you consider as

lasting elements, but which are elements of dissolution."

Murmurs. He exclaims: "Do you know what your centralized administration

may become in the hands of a perjured executive power? A vast treason,

carried into effect at one blow over the whole of France, by every

office-holder without exception."

Murmurs break out anew with redoubled violence; cries of "order!" The

orator continues: "Do you know what your standing army may become at

any moment? An instrument of crime. Passive obedience is the bayonet

ever pointed at the heart of the law. Yes, here, in this France, which

is the initiatress of the world, in this land of the tribune and the

press, in this birthplace of human thought, yes, the time may come when

the sword will rule, when you, inviolable legislators, will be collared

by corporals, when our glorious regiments will transform themselves,

for the profit of one man and to the shame of the nation, into

gold-laced hordes and pretorian bands, when the sword of France will

become a thing that strikes from behind, like the dagger of a hired

assassin, when the life-blood of the first city in the world, done to

death, will splash the gold epaulettes of your generals!"

The murmur becomes an uproar, cries of "Order!" are heard from all

quarters. The orator is interrupted: "You have been insulting the

government, now you insult the army!" The President calls the orator to

order.

The orator resumes:

"And if it should happen some day that a man, having in his hand the

five hundred thousand officeholders who constitute the government, and

the four hundred thousand soldiers composing the army, if it should

happen that this man should tear up the Constitution, should violate

every law, break every oath, trample upon every right, commit every

crime, do you know what your irremovable magistrates, instructors in

the right, and guardians of the law, would do? They would hold their

tongues."

The uproar prevents the orator from completing his sentence. The tumult

becomes a tempest.--"This man respects nothing. After the government

and the army, he drags the magistracy in the mire! Censure! censure!"

The orator is censured and the censure entered in the journal. The

President declares that, if he continues, the Assembly will proceed to

a vote, and the floor will be taken from him.

The orator continues: "And your paid clergy! and your office-holding

bishops! On the day when a pretender shall have employed in such

enterprises the government, the magistracy, and the army; on the day

when all these institutions shall drip with the blood shed by and for

the traitor; when, placed between the man who has committed the crimes

and God who orders an anathema to be launched against the criminal--do

you know what these bishops of yours will do? They will prostrate

themselves, not before God, but before man!"

Can you form any idea of the frenzied shouts and imprecations that

would greet such words? Can you imagine the shouts, the apostrophes,

the threats, the whole Assembly rising _en masse_, the tribune

escaladed and with difficulty guarded by the ushers! The orator has

profaned every sanctified ark in succession, and he has ended by

profaning the Holy of Holies, the clergy! And what does he mean by it

all? What a medley of impossible and infamous hypotheses! Do you not

hear Baroche growl, and Dupin thunder? The orator would be called to

order, censured, fined, suspended from the Chamber for three days, like

Pierre Leroux and Émile de Girardin; who can tell, perhaps expelled,

like Manuel.

And the next day, the indignant citizen would say: "That is well done!"

And from every quarter the journals devoted to order would shake their

fist at the CALUMNIATOR. And in his own party, on his usual bench in

the Assembly, his best friends would forsake him, and say: "It is his

own fault; he has gone too far; he has imagined chimeras and

absurdities."

And after this generous and heroic effort, it would be found that the

four institutions that have been attacked were more venerable and

impeccable than ever, and that the question, instead of advancing, had

receded.

V

WHAT PROVIDENCE HAS DONE

But Providence,--Providence goes about it differently. It places the

thing luminously before your eyes, and says, "Behold!"

A man arrives some fine morning,--and such a man! The first comer, the

last comer, without past, without future, without genius, without

renown, without prestige. Is he an adventurer? Is he a prince? This man

has his hands full of money, of bank-notes, of railroad shares, of

offices, of decorations, of sinecures; this man stoops down to the

office-holders, and says, "Office-holders, betray your trust!"

The office-holders betray their trust.

What, all? without one exception?

Yes, all!

He turns to the generals, and says: "Generals, massacre."

And the generals massacre.

He turns towards the irremovable judges, and says: "Magistrates, I

shatter the Constitution, I commit perjury, I dissolve the sovereign

Assembly, I arrest the inviolate members, I plunder the public

treasury, I sequester, I confiscate, I banish those who displease me, I

transport people according to my fancy, I shoot down without summons to

surrender, I execute without trial, I commit all that men are agreed in

calling crime, I outrage all that men are agreed in calling right;

behold the laws--they are under my feet."

"We will pretend not to see any thing," say the magistrates.

"You are insolent," replies the providential man. "To turn your eyes

away is to insult me. I propose that you shall assist me. Judges, you

are going to congratulate me to-day, me who am force and crime; and

to-morrow, those who have resisted me, those who are honor, right, and

law, them you will try,--and you will condemn them."

These irremovable judges kiss his boot, and set about investigating

_l'affaire des troubles_.

They swear fidelity to him, to boot.

Then he perceives, in a corner, the clergy, endowed, gold-laced, with

cross and cope and mitre, and he says:--

"Ah, you are there, Archbishop! Come here. Just bless all this for me."

And the Archbishop chants his _Magnificat_.

VI

WHAT THE MINISTERS, ARMY, MAGISTRACY, AND CLERGY HAVE DONE

Oh! what a striking thing and how instructive! "_Erudimini_," Bossuet

would say.

The Ministers fancied that they were dissolving the Assembly; they

dissolved the government.

The soldiers fired on the army and killed it.

The judges fancied that they were trying and convicting innocent

persons; they tried and convicted the irremovable magistracy.

The priests thought they were chanting hosannahs upon Louis Bonaparte;

they chanted a _De profundis_ upon the clergy.

VII

THE FORM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF GOD

When God desires to destroy a thing, he entrusts its destruction to the

thing itself.

Every bad institution of this world ends by suicide.

When they have weighed sufficiently long upon men, Providence, like the

sultan to his viziers, sends them the bowstring by a mute, and they

execute themselves.

Louis Bonaparte is the mute of Providence.

CONCLUSION--PART FIRST

PETTINESS OF THE MASTER--ABJECTNESS OF THE SITUATION

I

Never fear, History has him in its grip.

If perchance it flatters the self-love of M. Bonaparte to be seized by

history, if perchance, and truly one would imagine so, he cherishes any

illusion as to his value as a political miscreant, let him divest

himself of it.

Let him not imagine, because he has piled up horror on horror, that he

will ever raise himself to the elevation of the great historical

bandits. We have been wrong, perhaps, in some pages of this book, here

and there, to couple him with those men. No, although he has committed

enormous crimes, he will remain paltry. He will never be other than the

nocturnal strangler of liberty; he will never be other than the man who

intoxicated his soldiers, not with glory, like the first Napoleon, but

with wine; he will never be other than the pygmy tyrant of a great

people. Grandeur, even in infamy, is utterly inconsistent with the

calibre of the man. As dictator, he is a buffoon; let him make himself

emperor, he will be grotesque. That will finish him. His destiny is to

make mankind shrug their shoulders. Will he be less severely punished

for that reason? Not at all. Contempt does not, in his case, mitigate

anger; he will be hideous, and he will remain ridiculous. That is all.

History laughs and crushes.

Even the most indignant chroniclers will not help him there. Great

thinkers take satisfaction in castigating the great despots, and, in

some instances, even exalt them somewhat, in order to make them worthy

of their rage; but what would you have the historian do with this

fellow?

The historian can only lead him to posterity by the ear.

The man once stripped of success, the pedestal removed, the dust

fallen, the tinsel and spangles and the great sabre taken away, the

poor little skeleton laid bare and shivering,--can one imagine anything

meaner and more pitiful?

History has its tigers. The historians, immortal keepers of wild

beasts, exhibit this imperial menagerie to the nations. Tacitus alone,

that great showman, captured and confined eight or ten of these tigers

in the iron cage of his style. Look at them: they are terrifying and

superb; their spots are an element in their beauty. This is Nimrod, the

hunter of men; this, Busiris, the tyrant of Egypt; this, Phalaris, who

baked living men in a brazen bull, to make the bull roar; this,

Ahasuerus, who flayed the heads of the seven Maccabees, and had them

roasted alive; this, Nero, the burner of Rome, who smeared Christians

with wax and pitch, and then set them alight as torches; this,

Tiberius, the man of Capræa; this, Domitian; this, Caracalla; this,

Heliogabalus; that other is Commodus, who possesses an additional claim

to our respect in the horrible fact that he was the son of Marcus

Aurelius; these are Czars; these, Sultans; these, Popes, among whom

remark the tiger Borgia; here is Philip, called the Good, as the Furies

were called the Eumenides; here is Richard III, sinister and deformed;

here, with his broad face and his great paunch, Henry VIII, who, of

five wives that he had, killed three, one of whom he disemboweled; here

is Christiern II, the Nero of the North; here Philip II, the Demon of

the South. They are terrifying: hear them roar, consider them, one

after the other; the historian brings them to you; the historian drags

them, raging and terrible, to the side of the cage, opens their jaws

for you, shows you their teeth and their claws; you can say of every

one of them: "That is a royal tiger." In fact, they are taken from all

the thrones of the earth. History parades them through the ages. She

prevents them from dying; she takes care of them. They are her tigers.

She does not mingle jackals with them.

She puts and keeps apart the disgusting beasts. M. Bonaparte will be

with Claudius, with Ferdinand VII of Spain, with Ferdinand II of

Naples, in the hyena cage.

He is a bit of a brigand, and a great deal of a knave. One is always

conscious of the poor prince of industry, who lived from hand to mouth

in England; his present prosperity, his triumph, his empire, and his

inflation amount to nothing; the purple mantle trails over shoes down

at heel. Napoleon the Little, nothing more, nothing less. The title of

this book is well chosen.

The meanness of his vices prejudices the grandeur of his crimes. What

would you have? Peter the Cruel massacred, but he did not steal; Henry

III assassinated, but he did not swindle; Timour crushed children under

horses' hoofs, much as M. Bonaparte exterminated women and old men on

the boulevard, but he did not lie. Hear the Arabian historian:

"Timour-Beg, Sahib-Keran (master of the world and of the age, master of

the planetary conjunctions), was born at Kesch, in 1336; he slaughtered

a hundred thousand captives; as he was besieging Siwas, the

inhabitants, to mollify him, sent him a thousand little children,

bearing each a Koran on its head, and crying, 'Allah! Allah!' He caused

the sacred books to be removed with respect, and the children to be

crushed beneath the hoofs of wild horses. He used seventy thousand

human heads, with cement, stone, and brick, in building towers at

Herat, Sebzvar, Tekrit, Aleppo, and Bagdad; he detested lying; when he

had given his word, men could rely upon it."

M. Bonaparte is not of this stature. He has not that dignity which the

great despots of the East and of the West mingle with ferocity. The

amplitude of the Cæsars is wanting in him. To bear one's self worthily

and make a fair appearance among all the illustrious executioners who

have tortured mankind in the course of four thousand years, one must

not have any mental hesitation between a general of division and a

bass-drummer on the Champs-Elysées; one must not have been a constable

in London; one must not have undergone, with lowered eyes, in the Court

of Peers, the haughty scorn of M. Magnan; one must not have been called

"pickpocket" by the English newspapers; one must not have been menaced

with Clichy; in a word, there must have been nothing of the sneak in

the man.

Monsieur Louis Napoleon, you are ambitious, you aim high, but you must

have the truth told you. Well, what would you have us do in the matter?

In vain have you, by overturning the tribune of France, realized, after

your fashion, the wish of Caligula: "I would that mankind had but one

head, so that I might cut it off with a blow;" in vain have you

banished the republicans by thousands, as Philip III expelled the

Moors, and as Torquemada drove out the Jews; in vain have you dungeons

like Peter the Cruel, hulks like Hariadan, _dragonnades_ like Père

Letellier, and _oubliettes_ like Ezzelino III; in vain have you

perjured yourself like Ludovic Sforza; in vain have you massacred and

assassinated _en masse_ like Charles IX; in vain have you done all

this, in vain have you recalled all these names to men's minds when

they think of your name,--you are nothing but a rogue. A man is not a

monster for the wishing.

II

From every agglomeration of men, from every city, from every nation,

there inevitably arises a collective force.

Place this collective force at the service of liberty, let it rule by

universal suffrage, the city becomes a commune, the nation becomes a

republic.

This collective force is not, of its nature, intelligent. Belonging to

all, it belongs to no one; it floats about, so to speak, outside of the

people.

Until the day comes when, according to the true social formula,--_as

little government as possible_,--this force may be reduced to a mere

street and road police, paving the streets, lighting the lamps, and

looking after malefactors; until that day comes, this collective force,

being at the mercy of many chances and many ambitions, needs to be

guarded and protected by jealous, clear-sighted, well-armed

institutions.

It may be subjugated by tradition, it may be surprised by stratagem.

A man may rush upon it, seize it, bridle it, quell it, and cause it to

trample upon the citizens.

The tyrant is the man, who, born of tradition, like Nicholas of Russia,

or of stratagem, like Louis Bonaparte, seizes for his own profit, and

according to his caprice disposes of the collective force of a people.

This man, if he be by birth what Nicholas is, is the enemy of society;

if he have done what Louis Bonaparte has done, he is a public robber.

The former has no account to settle with regular legal justice, with

the articles of codes. He has behind him, spying upon and watching him,

hatred in their hearts, and vengeance in their hands, Orloff in his

palace, and Mouravieff among the people; he may be assassinated by one

of his army, or poisoned by one of his family; he runs the risk of

barrack conspiracies, of revolts of regiments, of secret military

societies, of domestic plots, of sudden, mysterious maladies, of

terrible blows, of great catastrophes. The other ought simply to go to

Poissy.

The former has the wherewithal to die in the purple, and to end his

life with pomp and royally, as monarchs end and tragedies. The other

must live; live between four walls behind bars, through which the

people can look at him, sweeping courtyards, making horse-hair brushes

or list shoes, emptying buckets, with a green cap on his head, wooden

shoes on his feet, and straw in his shoes.

Ah! ye leaders of the old parties, ye men of absolutism, in France you

voted _en masse_ among 7,500,000; outside of France you applauded,

taking this Cartouche for the hero of order. He is ferocious enough for

it, I admit; but look at his size. Don't be ungrateful to your real

colossi; you have cashiered your Haynaus and your Radetzkys too

precipitately. Above all, weigh this comparison, which so naturally

presents itself to the mind. What is this Mandrin of Lilliput beside

Nicholas, Czar, Emperor, and Pope, a power half-Bible, half-knout, who

damns and condemns, drills eight hundred thousand soldiers and two

hundred thousand priests, holds in his right hand the keys of paradise,

and in his left hand the keys of Siberia, and possesses, as his

chattel, sixty millions of men--their souls as if he were God, their

bodies as if he were the tomb!

III

If there should not be ere long a sudden, imposing, and overwhelming

catastrophe, if the present situation of the nation should be prolonged

and endure, the grand injury, the fearful injury, would be the moral

injury.

The boulevards of Paris, the streets of Paris, the rural districts and

the towns of twenty departments of France, were strewn on the 2nd of

December with dead and dying citizens; there were seen, before their

thresholds, fathers and mothers slaughtered, children sabred,

dishevelled women in pools of blood, disemboweled by grape-shot; there

were seen, in the houses, suppliants massacred, some shot in heaps in

their cellars, others despatched by the bayonet under their beds,

others struck down by a bullet on their own hearths. The impress of

bloodstained hands of all sizes may be seen at this moment, here on a

wall, there on a door, there in a recess; for three days after the

victory of Louis Bonaparte, Paris walked in ruddy mire; a cap full of

human brains was hung on a tree on Boulevard des Italiens. I, who write

these lines, saw, among other victims, on the night of the 4th, near

the Mauconseil barricade, an aged white-haired man, stretched on the

pavement, his bosom pierced with a bayonet, his collar-bone broken; the

gutter that ran beneath him bore away his blood. I saw, I touched with

my hands, I helped to undress, a poor child seven years old, killed,

they told me, on Rue Tiquetonne; he was pale, his head rolled from one

shoulder to the other while they were taking off his clothes; his

half-closed eyes were fixed and staring, and as I leaned over his

half-opened mouth, it seemed that I could still hear him murmur

faintly, "Mother!"

Well, there is something more heart-rending than murdered child, more

lamentable than that old man shot dead, more horrible than that cap

full of human brains, more frightful than those pavements red with

carnage, more irreparable than those men and women, those fathers and

those mothers, stabbed and murdered,--it is the vanishing honour of a

great people!

Assuredly those pyramids of dead bodies which one saw in the

cemeteries, after the wagons from the Champ-de-Mars had emptied their

contents; those immense open trenches, which they filled in the morning

with human bodies, making speed because of the increasing light of

day,--all this was frightful; but what is still more frightful is to

think that, at this hour, the nations are in doubt; and that in their

eyes France, that great moral splendour, has disappeared!

That which is more heart-rending than skulls cleft by the sword, than

breasts riddled by bullets, more disastrous than houses pillaged, than

murder filling the streets, than blood shed in rivers, is to think that

now, among all the peoples of the earth, men are saying to one another:

"Do you know that that nation of nations, that people of the 14th of

July, that people of the 10th of August, that people of 1830, that

people of 1848, that race of giants which razed bastiles, that race of

men whose faces cast a bright light, that fatherland of the human race

which produced heroes and thinkers, those heroes who made all the

revolutions and gave birth to all births, that France whose name meant

liberty, that soul of the world, so to say, which shone resplendent in

Europe, that light.... Well! some one has stepped upon it, and put it

out. There is no longer a France. It is at an end. Look! everywhere

darkness. The world is feeling its way."

Ah! it was so grand. Where are those times, those glorious times,

interspersed with storms, but glorious, when all was life, when all was

liberty, when all was glory? those times when the French people, awake

before all others, and up before the light, their brows illumined by

the dawn of the future already risen for them, said to the other

nations, still drowsy and overborne, and scarcely able to shake their

chains in their sleep: "Fear naught, I work for all, I dig the earth

for all,--I am the workman of the Almighty!"

What profound grief! Regard that torpor where formerly there was such

power! that shame, where formerly there was such pride! that noble

people, whose heads were once held erect and are now lowered!

Alas! Louis Bonaparte has done more than kill persons, he has caused

men's minds to dwindle, he has withered the heart of the citizen. One

must belong to the race of the invincible and the indomitable, to

persevere now in the rugged path of renunciation and of duty. An

indescribable gangrene of material prosperity threatens to cause public

honesty to degenerate into rottenness. Oh! what happiness to be

banished, to be disgraced, to be ruined,--is it not, brave workmen? Is

it not, worthy peasants, driven from France, who have no roof to

shelter you, and no shoes to your feet? What happiness to eat black

bread, to lie on a mattress thrown on the ground, to be out at elbows,

to be away from all this, and to those who say to you: "You are

French!" to answer, "I am proscribed!"

What a pitiful thing is this delight of self-interest and cupidity,

wallowing in the slough of the 2nd of December! Faith! let us live, let

us go into business, let us speculate in zinc and railway shares, let

us make money; it is degrading but it is an excellent thing; a scruple

less, a louis more; let us sell our whole soul at that rate. One runs

to and fro, one rushes about, one cools his heels in anterooms, one

drinks deep of every kind of shame, and if one cannot get a concession

of railways in France or of lands in Africa, one asks for an office. A

host of intrepid devotions besiege the Elysée, and collect about the

man. Junot, beside the first Bonaparte, defied the splashing of shells,

these fellows beside the second, defy the splashing of mud. What care

they about sharing his ignominy, provided they share his fortune? The

competition is to see who shall carry on this traffic in himself most

cynically; and among these creatures there are young men with pure

limpid eyes, and all the appearance of generous youth; and there are

old men, who have but one fear, which is, that the office solicited may

not reach them in time, and that they may not succeed in dishonouring

themselves before they die. One would sell himself for a prefecture,

another for a collectorship, another for a consulate; one wants a

tobacco license, another an embassy. All want money, some more, some

less; for it is of the salary they think, not of the duties. Every one

has his hand out. All offer themselves. One of these days we shall have

to appoint an assayer of consciences at the Mint.

What! this is what we have come to! What! those very men who supported

the _coup d'état_, those very men who recoiled from the red

_croquemitaine_ and the twaddle about Jacquerie in 1852; those very

men to whom that crime seemed a good thing, because, according to them,

it rescued from peril their consols, their ledgers, their money-boxes,

their bill-books,--even they do not comprehend that material interest,

surviving alone, would, after all, be only a melancholy waif in an

immense moral shipwreck, and that it is a fearful and monstrous

situation, when men say: "All is saved, save honour!"

The words independence, enfranchisement, progress, popular pride,

national pride, French greatness, may no longer be pronounced in

France. Hush! these words make too much noise; let us walk on tiptoe,

and speak low; we are in a sick man's chamber.

Who is this man?--He is the chief, the master. Every one obeys

him.--Ah! every one respects him, then?--No, every one despises

him.--Oh! what a plight!

And military honour, where is it? Let us say no more, if you please, of

what the army did in December, but of what it is undergoing at this

moment, of that which is at its head, of that which is on its head. Do

you think of that? Does it think of that? O army of the republic! army

that had for captains, generals paid with four francs a day; army that

had for leaders, Carnot, austerity, Marceau, unselfishness, Hoche,

honour, Kléber, devotion, Joubert, probity, Desaix, valour, Bonaparte,

genius! O, French army, poor, unfortunate, heroic army, gone astray in

the train of these men! What will they do with it? whither will they

lead it? how will they occupy it? what parodies are we destined to see

and hear? Alas! what are these men who command our regiments, and who

govern us? The master--we know him. This fellow, who had been a

minister, was going to be "seized" on the 3rd of December; it was for

that reason he _made_ the 2nd. That other is the "borrower" of the

twenty-five millions from the Bank. That other is the man of the gold

ingots. To that other, before he was made minister, "a friend"

said:--"_I say! you are humbugging us about the shares in that affair;

that won't go down with me. If there's any swindling going on, let me

at least have a finger in it._" That other, who wears epaulettes, has

just been convicted of selling mortgaged property; that other, who also

wears epaulettes, received, on the morning of the 2nd of December,

100,000 francs, for "emergencies." He was only a colonel; if he had

been a general he would have had more. This man, who is a general, when

he was a body-guard of Louis XVIII, being on duty behind the king's

chair during mass, cut a gold tassel from the throne and put it in his

pocket; he was expelled from the guards for that. Surely, to these men,

also, we might rear a column, _ex aere capto_, with the money they

stole. This other, who is a general of division, "converted" 52,000

francs, to the knowledge of Colonel Caharras, in the construction of

the villages of Saint André and Saint Hippolyte, near Mascara. This

one, who is general-in-chief, was christened at Ghent, where he is

known, _le général Cinq-cents-francs_. This one, who is Minister of

War, has only General Rulhière's clemency to thank that he was not sent

before a court-martial. Such are the men. No matter; forward! beat,

drums, sound, trumpets, wave, flags! Soldiers, from the top of yon

pyramids the forty thieves look down upon you!

Let us go farther into this mournful subject, and survey it in all its

aspects.

The mere spectacle of fortune like that of M. Bonaparte, placed at the

head of the state, would suffice to demoralize a people.

There is always, and it is the fault of our social institutions, that

ought, above all, to enlighten and civilize, there is always, in a

large population like that of France, a class which is ignorant, which

suffers, covets, and struggles, placed between the brutish instinct

which impels it to take, and the moral law which invites it to labour.

In the grievous and oppressed condition in which it still is, this

class, in order to maintain itself in probity and well-doing, requires

all the pure and holy light that emanates from the Gospel; it requires

that, on the one hand, the spirit of Jesus Christ, and, on the other,

the spirit of the French Revolution, should address to it the same

manly words, and should never cease to point out to it, as the only

lights worthy of the eyes of man, the exalted and mysterious laws of

human destiny,--self-denial, devotion, sacrifice, the labour which

leads to material well-being, the probity which leads to inward

well-being; even with this perennial instruction, at once divine and

human, this class, so worthy of sympathy and fraternity, often

succumbs. Suffering and temptation are stronger than virtue. Now do you

comprehend the infamous counsel which the success of M. Bonaparte gives

to this class?

A poor man, in rags, without money, without work, is there in the

shadow, at the corner of the street, seated on a stone; he is

meditating, and at the same time repelling, a bad action; now he

wavers, now he recovers himself; he is starving, and feels a desire to

rob; to rob he must make a false key, he must scale a wall; then, the

key made and the wall scaled, he will stand before the strong box; if

any one wakes, if any one resists, he must kill. His hair stands on

end, his eyes become haggard, his conscience, the voice of God, revolts

within him, and cries to him: "Stop! this is evil! these are crimes!"

At that moment the head of the state passes by; the man sees M.

Bonaparte in his uniform of a general, with the _cordon rouge_, and

with footmen in gold-laced liveries, dashing towards his palace in a

carriage drawn by four horses; the unhappy wretch, hesitating before

his crime, greedily gazes on this splendid vision; and the serenity of

M. Bonaparte, and his gold epaulettes, and his _cordon rouge_, and

the liveries, and the palace, and the four-horse carriage, say to him:

"Succeed."

He attaches himself to this apparition, he follows it, he runs to the

Élysée; a gilded mob rushes in after the prince. All sorts of carriages

pass under that portal, and he has glimpses of happy, radiant men! This

one is an ambassador; the ambassador looks at him, and says: "Succeed."

This is a bishop; the bishop looks at him and says: "Succeed." This is

a judge; the judge looks at him, and smiles on him, and says:

"Succeed."

Thus, to escape the gendarmes,--therein consists henceforth the whole

moral law. To rob, to pillage, to poignard, to assassinate, all this is

criminal only when one is fool enough to allow himself to be caught.

Every man who meditates a crime has a constitution to violate, an oath

to break, an obstacle to destroy. In a word, take your measures well.

Be adroit. Succeed. The only guilty actions are the _coups_ that fail.

You put your hand in the pocket of a passer-by, in the evening, at

nightfall, in a lonely place; he seizes you; you let go; he arrests

you, and takes you to the guard-house. You are guilty; to the galleys!

You do not let go: you have a knife about you, you bury it in the man's

throat; he falls; he is dead; now take his purse, and make off. Bravo!

capitally done! You have shut the victim's mouth, the only witness who

could speak. Nobody has anything to say to you.

If you had only robbed the man, you would have been in the wrong; kill

him, and you are right.

Succeed, that is the point.

Ah! this is indeed alarming!

On the day when the human conscience shall lose its bearings, on the

day when success shall carry the day before that forum, all will be at

an end. The last moral gleam will reascend to heaven. Darkness will be

in the mind of man. You will have nothing to do but to devour one

another, wild beasts that you are!

With moral degradation goes political degradation. M. Bonaparte treats

the people of France like a conquered country. He effaces the

republican inscriptions; he cut down the trees of liberty, and makes

firewood of them. There was on Place Bourgogne a statue of the

Republic; he puts the pickaxe to it; there was on our coinage a figure

of the Republic, crowned with ears of corn; M. Bonaparte replaces it by

the profile of M. Bonaparte. He has his bust crowned and harangued in

the market-places, just as the tyrant Gessler made the people salute

his cap. The rustics in the faubourgs were in the habit of singing in

chorus, in the evening, as they returned from work; they used to sing

the great republican songs, the Marseillaise, the Chant du Depart; they

were ordered to keep silent; the faubourgers will sing no more; there

is amnesty only for obscenities and drunken songs. The triumph is so

complete, that they no longer keep within bounds. Only yesterday they

kept in hiding, they did their shooting at night; it was shocking, but

there was still some shame; there was a remnant of respect for the

people; they seemed to think that it had still enough life in it to

revolt, if it saw such things. Now they show themselves, they fear

nothing, they guillotine in broad day. Whom do they guillotine? Whom?

the men of the law, and the law is there! Whom? the men of the people!

and the people is there! Nor is this all. There is a man in Europe, who

horrifies Europe: that man sacked Lombardy, he set up the gibbets of

Hungary; he had a woman whipped under the gibbet upon which hung her

husband and her son; we still remember the terrible letter in which

that woman recounts the deed, and says: "My heart has turned to stone."

Last year this man took it into his head to visit England as a tourist,

and, while in London, he took it into his head to visit a brewery, that

of Barclay and Perkins. There he was recognized; a voice whispered: "It

is Haynau!"--"It is Haynau!" repeated the workmen!--It was a fearful

cry; the crowd rushed upon the wretch, tore out his infamous white hair

by handfuls, spat in his face, and thrust him out. Well, this old

bandit in epaulettes, this Haynau, this man who still bears on his

cheek the immense buffet of the English people, it is announced that

"Monseigneur the Prince-President invites him to visit France." It is

quite right; London put an affront on him, Paris owes him an ovation.

It is a reparation. Be it so. We will be there to see. Haynau was

cursed and hooted at the brewery of Barclay and Perkins, he will

receive bouquets at the brewery of Saint-Antoine. The Faubourg

Saint-Antoine will receive an order to conduct itself properly. The

Faubourg Saint-Antoine, mute, motionless, impassive, will see them

pass, triumphant and conversing together, like two friends, through its

old revolutionary streets, one in French, the other in Austrian

uniform,--Louis Bonaparte, the murderer of the boulevard, arm-in-arm

with Haynau, the whipper of women! Go on, add insult to insult,

disfigure this France of ours, fallen flat on the pavement! make her

unrecognizable! crush the faces of the people with your heels!

Oh! inspire me, seek for me, give me, invent for me a means, whatever

it may be, short of a poignard, which I repudiate,--a Brutus for that

man! bah! he is not worthy of even a Louvel!--find me some means of

laying that man low, and of delivering my country! of laying that man

low, that man of craft, that man of lies, that man of success, that man

of evil! Some means, the first that offers,--pen, sword, paving-stone,

_émeute_,--by the people, by the soldier; yes, whatever it be, so it be

honourable, and in open day, I take it, we all take it, we proscribed,

if it can re-establish liberty, set free the republic, deliver our

country from shame, and drive back to his dust, to his oblivion, to

his cloaca, this imperial ruffian, this prince pick-pocket, this gypsy

king, this traitor, this master, this groom of Franconi's! this

radiant, imperturbable, self-satisfied governor, crowned with his

successful crime, who goes and comes, and peacefully parades trembling

Paris, and who has everything on his side,--the Bourse, the

shopkeepers, the magistracy, all influences, all guarantees, all

invocations, from the _Nom de Dieu_ of the soldier to the Te Deum of

the priest!

Really, when one has fixed one's eyes too long on certain aspects of

this spectacle, even the strongest minds are attacked with vertigo.

But does he, at least, do himself justice, this Bonaparte? Has he a

glimmering, an idea, a suspicion, the slightest perception, of his

infamy? Really, one is driven to doubt it.

Yes, sometimes, from the lofty words he uses, when one hears him make

incredible appeals to posterity, to that posterity which will shudder

with horror and wrath at him; when one hears him speak coolly of his

"legitimacy," and his "mission," one is almost tempted to think that he

has come to take himself into high consideration, and that his head is

turned to such a degree that he no longer perceives what he is, nor

what he does. He believes in the adhesion of the poor, he believes in

the good-will of kings, he believes in the fête of eagles, he believes

in the harangues of the Council of State, he believes in the

benedictions of the bishops, he believes in the oath that he has forced

people to take, he believes in the 7,500,000 votes!

He is talking now, feeling in the humour of Augustus, of granting

amnesty to the proscribed. Usurpation granting amnesty to right!

treason to honour! cowardice to courage! crime to virtue! He is to that

degree embruted by his success that he thinks this all very simple.

Singular effect of intoxication! Optical illusion! In his eyes that

thing of the 14th of January appears all golden and glorious and

radiant, that constitution defiled with mud, stained with blood, laden

with chains, dragged amid the hooting of Europe by the police, the

Senate, the Corps Législatif and the Council of State, all newly shod.

He takes as a triumphal car, and would drive under the Arc de l'Étoile,

that sledge, standing on which, hideous, with whip in hand, he parades

the ensanguined corpse of the republic!

CONCLUSION--PART SECOND

FAITH AND AFFLICTION

I

Providence brings to maturity men, things, and events, by the single

fact of universal life. To cause the disappearance of an old world it

is sufficient that civilization, ascending majestically towards its

solstice, should shine upon old institutions, upon old prejudices, upon

old laws, and upon old customs. This radiation burns and devours the

past. Civilization enlightens, this is the visible fact; and at the

same time it consumes, this is the mysterious fact. Under its

influence, gradually and without a shock, that which should decline

declines, and what should grow old grows old; wrinkles appear upon

things condemned, on castes, on codes, on institutions, and on

religions. This work of decrepitude is, in some sort, self-acting. A

fruitful decrepitude, under which germinates the new life. Little by

little the ruin progresses; deep crevices, which are not visible,

ramify in the darkness, and internally reduce to powder the venerable

structure, which still appears a solid mass without; and suddenly, some

fine day, this ancient _ensemble_ of worm-eaten things, of which

decaying societies are composed, becomes shapeless, the nails come out,

the structure becomes disjointed, and overhangs. Then it no longer has

any solidity. Let one of those giants peculiar to revolutions appear;

let him raise his hand, and all is said. There was a moment in history

when a nudge of Danton's elbow would have shaken all Europe to its

foundations.

The year 1848 was such a moment. Ancient Europe, feudal, papal, and

monarchical, replastered so disastrously for France, in 1815, tottered.

But there was no Danton. The crash did not take place.

It has often been said, in the commonplace phraseology used on similar

occasions, that 1848 opened a gulf. Not at all. The corpse of the past

lay upon Europe; it lies there still at this moment. The year 1848

opened a grave wherein to throw that corpse. It is this grave that has

been taken for a gulf.

In 1848 all that still held to the past, all that still survived of the

body, had a close view of this grave. Not only the kings upon their

thrones, the cardinals under their hats, the judges in the shadow of

their guillotines, the captains on their war-horses, were thrown into

commotion; but he who had any interest whatever in what was about to

disappear; he who was cultivating for his own profit a social fiction,

and had an abuse to let out on hire; he who was guardian of some

falsehood, doorkeeper of some prejudice, or farmer of some

superstition; he who was taking advantage of another, or dealing in

usury, oppression and falsehood; he who sold by false weights, from

those who falsify a balance to those who falsify the Bible; from the

cheating merchant to the cheating priest; from those who manipulate

figures to those who traffic in miracles,--all, from the Jew banker who

feels that he is more or less Catholic, to the bishop who becomes more

or less of a Jew,--all the men of the past inclined their heads towards

one another and trembled.

This grave, which was gaping, and into which had nearly fallen all the

fictions--their treasure--which have weighed upon men for so many ages,

they resolved to fill up. They determined to wall it up, to pile rocks

and stones upon it, and to erect upon the pile a gibbet, and to hang

upon this gibbet, all bleeding and dejected, that mighty culprit,

Truth.

They determined, once for all, to make an end of the spirit of freedom

and emancipation, and to drive back and repress for ever the upward

tendency of mankind.

The enterprise was formidable. What the nature of it was we have

already indicated, more than once, in this book and elsewhere.

To undo the labour of twenty generations; to kill in the nineteenth

century, by strangulation, three centuries, the sixteenth, the

seventeenth, and the eighteenth, that is to say, Luther, Descartes, and

Voltaire, religious scrutiny, philosophical scrutiny, universal

scrutiny; to crush throughout all Europe this immense vegetation of

free thought, here a tender blade, there a sturdy oak; to marry the

knout and the holy-water-sprinkler; to put more of Spain in the South,

and more of Russia in the North; to resuscitate all they could of the

Inquisition, and to stifle all they could of intelligence; to stultify

youth, in other words to brutalize the future; to make the world a

witness of the _auto-da-fé_ of ideas; to throw down the tribune, to

suppress the newspaper, the placard, the book, the spoken word, the

cry, the whisper, the breath; to make silence; to pursue thought into

the case of the printer, into the composing-stick, into the leaden

type, into the stereotype, into the lithograph, into the drawing, upon

the stage, into the street-show, into the mouth of the actor, into the

copy-book of the schoolmaster, into the hawker's pack; to hold out to

each man, for faith, for law, for aim in life, and for God, his selfish

interest; to say to nations: "Eat and think no more;" to take man from

the brain, and put him in the belly; to extinguish individual initiative,

local life, national impulse, all those deep-rooted instincts which

impel man to that which is right; to annihilate that _ego_ of nations

which is called the fatherland; to destroy nationality among

partitioned and dismembered peoples, constitutions in constitutional

states, the republic in France, and liberty everywhere; to plant the

foot everywhere upon human effort.

In one word, to close that abyss which is called Progress.

Such was the plan, vast, enormous, European, which no one conceived,

for not one of those men of the old world had had genius for it, but

which all followed. As for the plan in itself, as for that

all-embracing idea of universal repression, whence came it? who could

tell? It was seen in the air. It appeared in the past. It enlightened

certain souls, it pointed to certain routes. It was a gleam issuing

from the tomb of Machiavelii.

At certain moments of human history, from the things which are plotted

and the things which are done, it would seem that all the old demons of

humanity, Louis XI, Philip II, Catherine de Medicis, the Duke of Alva,

Torquemada, are somewhere or other in a corner, seated around a table,

and taking counsel together.

We look, we search, and instead of the colossi, we find abortions.

Where we expected to see the Duke of Alva, we find Schwartzenberg;

where we expected to see Torquemada we find Veuillot. The old European

despotism continues its march, with these little men, and goes on and

on; it resembles the Czar Peter when travelling:--"_We relay with

what we can find," he wrote; "_when we had no more Tartar horses, we

took donkeys." To attain this object, the repression of everything and

everybody, it was necessary to pursue an obscure, tortuous, rugged,

difficult path; they pursued it. Some of those who entered it, knew

what they were doing.

Parties are kept alive by watchwords; those men, those ringleaders,

whom 1848 frightened and assembled, had, as we have said above, adopted

theirs: religion, family, property. With that commonplace adroitness

which suffices when one speaks to fear, they exploited certain obscure

aspects of what was called socialism. It was a question of "saving

religion, property, and the family."--"Save the flag!" they exclaimed.

The vulgar herd of terrified selfish interests threw themselves into

the current.

They coalesced, they made a stand, they formed in mass. They had a

crowd around them. This crowd was composed of diverse elements. The

landed proprietor entered it because his rents had fallen; the peasant,

because he had paid the forty-five centimes; he who did not believe in

God thought it necessary to save religion, because he had been forced

to sell his horses. They extracted from this crowd the force it

contained, and made use of it. They made everything contribute to

repression: the law, despotism, the assemblies, the tribune, the jury,

the magistracy, the police; in Lombardy the sabre, at Naples the

convict prison, in Hungary the gibbet. To remuzzle men's intellects, to

replace the fetters on men's minds, these runaway slaves, to prevent

the past from disappearing, to prevent the future from being born, to

remain kings, powerful, privileged and happy, all means were good, all

just, all legitimate. For the exigencies of the struggle, they

manufactured and spread throughout the world a sort of ambuscade-morality

against liberty, which Ferdinand put in action at Palermo, Antonelli at

Rome, Schwartzenberg at Milan and at Pesth, and later, at Paris, those

wolves of state, the men of December.

There was a nation among the nations, which was a sort of elder brother

in this family of the oppressed, a prophet in the human tribe. This

nation took the initiative of the whole human movement. It went on,

saying, "Come!" and the rest followed. As a complement to the

fraternity of men, in the Gospel, it taught the fraternity of nations.

It spoke by the voice of its writers, of its poets, of its

philosophers, of its orators, as by a single mouth, and its words flew

to the extremities of the earth, to rest, like tongues of fire, upon

the brow of all nations. It presided over the communion of intellects.

It multiplied the bread of life to those who were wandering in the

desert. One day it was enveloped in a tempest; it marched over the

abyss, and said to the frightened nations: "Why are you afraid?" The

wave of the revolutions it had excited subsided under its footsteps,

and, far from engulfing it, increased its glory. The suffering, infirm,

and diseased nations pressed around it; one was limping, for the chain

of the Inquisition, riveted to its foot for three centuries, had lamed

it; to this one it said, "Walk!" and it walked. Another was blind, the

old Roman papistry had filled its eyes with mist and darkness; to this

one it said, "Receive thy sight!" it opened its eyes and saw. "Throw

away your crutches, that is to say, your prejudices," it said; "throw

away your bandages, that is to say, your superstitions; stand upright,

raise your head, look at the sky, look at God. The future is yours. O

nations! you have a leprosy, ignorance; you have a plague, fanaticism;

there is not one of you but is afflicted with that frightful malady

called a despot; go, march, break the bonds of evil; I deliver you, I

cure you!" Throughout the earth a grateful clamour arose among the

nations which these words made sound and strong. One day it accosted

dead Poland; it raised its finger, and exclaimed, "Arise!" and dead

Poland arose.

This nation, the men of the past, whose fall it announced, dreaded and

hated. By dint of stratagem, of tortuous patience, and of audacity,

they ended by seizing it, and succeeded in throttling it.

For three years and more, the world has witnessed a tremendous agony

and a frightful spectacle. For three years and more, the men of the

past, the scribes, the Pharisees, the publicans, the princes of the

priests, have crucified, in presence of the human race, the Christ of

nations, the French people. Some furnished the cross, others the nails,

others the hammer. Falloux placed upon its forehead the crown of

thorns. Montalembert placed upon its mouth the sponge, dipped in gall

and vinegar. Louis Bonaparte is the miserable soldier who struck his

lance into its side, and caused it to utter the supreme cry: _Eli!

Eli! Lama Sabachthani_!

Now it is all over. The French nation is dead. The great tomb is about

to open.

For three days!

II

Let us have faith.

No, let us not be cast down. To despair is to desert.

Let us look to the future.

The future,--no one knows what tempests still separate us from port,

but the port, the distant and radiant port, is in sight; the future, we

repeat, is the republic for all men; let us add, the future is peace

with all men.

Let us not fall into the vulgar error, which is to curse and to

dishonour the age in which we live. Erasmus called the sixteenth

century "the excrement of the ages," _fex temporum_. Bossuet thus

qualified the seventeenth century: "A wicked and paltry age." Rousseau

branded the eighteenth century, in these terms: "This great rottenness

amidst which we live." Posterity has proved these illustrious men in

the wrong. It has said to Erasmus: "The sixteenth century was great;"

it has said to Bossuet: "The seventeenth century was great;" it has

said to Rousseau: "The eighteenth century was great."

Even had the infamy of those ages been actual, those great men would

have been wrong to complain. The man who thinks should accept simply

and calmly the surroundings in which Providence has placed him. The

splendour of human intelligence, the loftiness of genius, shine no less

by contrast than by harmony with the age. The stoic and profound

philosopher is not diminished by an external debasement. Virgil,

Petrarch, Racine are great in their purple; Job is still greater on his

dunghill.

But we can say, we men of the nineteenth century, that the nineteenth

century is not the dunghill. However deep the shame of the present,

whatever blows we receive from the fluctuation of events, whatever the

apparent desertion or the momentary lethargy of mental vigour, none of

us, democrats, will repudiate the magnificent epoch in which we live,

the virile age of mankind.

Let us proclaim it aloud, let us proclaim it in our fall and in our

defeat, this is the greatest of all ages! and do you know the reason

why? because it is the mildest. This age, the immediate issue, the

firstborn offspring, of the French Revolution, frees the slave in

America, raises from his degradation the _pariah_ in Asia, abolishes

the suttee in India, and extinguishes in Europe the last brands of the

stake, civilizes Turkey, carries the Gospel into the domain of the

Koran, dignifies woman, subordinates the right of the strongest to that

of the most just, suppresses pirates, mitigates sentences, makes the

galleys healthy, throws the red-hot iron into the sewer, condemns the

penalty of death, removes the ball and chain from the leg of the

convict, abolishes torture, degrades and brands war, stifles Dukes of

Alva and Charles the Ninths, and extracts the claws of tyrants.

This age proclaims the sovereignty of the citizen, and the

inviolability of life; it crowns the people, and consecrates man.

In art, it possesses all varieties of genius,--writers, orators, poets,

historians, publicists, philosophers, painters, sculptors, musicians;

majesty, grace, power, force, splendour, colour, form, style; it renews

its strength in the real and in the ideal, and bears in its hand the

two thunderbolts, the true and the beautiful. In science it

accomplishes unheard-of miracles; it makes of cotton saltpetre, of

steam a horse, of the voltaic battery a workman, of the electric fluid

a messenger, of the sun a painter; it waters itself with subterranean

streams, pending the time when it shall warm itself with the central

fire; it opens upon the two infinites those two windows, the telescope

upon the infinitely great, the microscope upon the infinitely little,

and it finds stars in the first abyss, and insects in the second, which

prove to it the existence of God. It annihilates time, it annihilates

space, it annihilates suffering; it writes a letter from Paris to

London, and has an answer in ten minutes; it cuts off a man's leg, the

man sings and smiles.

It has now only to realize--and it has nearly done it--a progress which

is nothing compared to the miracles it has already wrought; it has only

to find the means of directing through a mass of air a bubble of

lighter air; it has already obtained the bubble of air, and keeps it

imprisoned; it has now only to find the impulsive force, only to cause

a vacuum before the balloon, for instance, only to burn the air before

the aerostat, as the rocket does before itself; it has only to solve

this problem in some way or other; and it will solve it, and do you

know what will happen then? At that instant frontiers will vanish, all

barriers will be swept away; everything that constitutes a Chinese wall

round thought, round commerce, round industry, round nationalities,

round progress, will crumble; in spite of censorships, in spite of

_index expurgatorius_, it will rain books and journals upon every

country under the sun; Voltaire, Diderot, Rousseau, will fall like hail

upon Rome, Naples, Vienna, St. Petersburg; the human word is manna, and

the serf will gather it in the furrows; fanaticism will die, oppression

will be impossible; man dragged himself along the ground,--he will

escape; civilization changes itself into a flock of birds, and flies

away, and whirls about and alights joyously at the same moment upon

every point of the globe. Lo! yonder it passes; aim your cannons, old

despotisms, it disdains you; you are only the bullet, it is the

lightning; no more hatreds, no more mutually devouring interests, no

more wars; a sort of new life, composed of concord and light, pervades

and soothes the world; the fraternity of nations soars through space,

and holds communion in the eternal azure; men mingle in the skies.

While we await this final progress, let us consider the point to which

this age had brought civilization.

Formerly there was a world in which people walked slowly, with bent

back, and eyes cast down; in which the Comte de Gouvon was served at

table by Jean-Jacques; in which the Chevalier de Rohan belaboured

Voltaire with a stick; in which Daniel Defoe was placed in the pillory;

in which a city like Dijon was separated from a city like Paris by the

necessity of making one's will, by robbers at every corner, and ten

days by stage; in which a book was a sort of infamy and filth which the

hangman burned upon the steps of the Palais de Justice; in which

superstition and ferocity shook hands; in which the Pope said to the

Emperor: "_Jungamus dexteras, gladium gladio copulemus_;" in which

one met at every step crosses hung with amulets, and gibbets hung with

men; in which there were heretics, Jews, and lepers; in which houses

had battlements and loop-holes; in which streets were closed with a

chain, rivers with a chain, and even camps with a chain (as at the

battle of Tolosa), cities with walls, kingdoms with prohibitions and

penalties; in which, with the exception of force and authority, which

stuck tightly together, everything was penned up, distributed, divided,

cut into fragments, hated and hating, scattered and dead; men were as

dust, power a solid block. But now we have a world in which everything

is alive, united, combined, coupled, mingled together; a world in which

thought, commerce, and industry reign; in which politics, more and more

firmly fixed, tends to an intimate union with science; a world in which

the last scaffolds and the last cannon are hastening to cut off their

last heads and to vomit forth their last shells; a world in which light

increases every instant; a world in which distance has disappeared, in

which Constantinople is nearer to Paris than Lyons was a hundred years

ago, in which Europe and America pulsate with the same heart-throb; a

world all circulation and all love, of which France is the brain, the

railroads the arteries, and the electric wires the fibres. Do you not

see that simply to set forth such a state of affairs is to explain, to

demonstrate, and to solve everything? Do you not feel that the old

world had an aged soul, tyranny, and that into the new world is about

to descend, necessarily, irresistibly, and divinely, a youthful soul,

liberty?

This was the work that the nineteenth century had done among men, and

was continuing in glorious, fashion to do,--that century of sterility,

that century of domination, that century of decadence, that century of

degradation, as it is called by the pedants, the rhetoricians, the

imbeciles, and all that filthy brood of bigots, of knaves, and of

sharpers, who sanctimoniously slaver gall upon glory, who assert that

Pascal was a madman, Voltaire a coxcomb, and Rousseau a brute, and

whose triumph it would be to put a fool's-cap upon the human race.

You speak of the Lower Empire; are you serious? Had the Lower Empire

behind it John Huss, Luther, Cervantes, Shakespere, Pascal, Molière,

Voltaire, Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Mirabeau? Had the Lower Empire

behind it the taking of the Bastile, the Federation, Danton,

Robespierre, the Convention? Did the Lower Empire possess America? Had

the Lower Empire universal suffrage? Had the Lower Empire those two

ideas, country and humanity: country which enlarges the heart, humanity

which expands the horizon? Do you know that, under the Lower Empire,

Constantinople fell in ruins, and finally had only thirty thousand

inhabitants? Has Paris fallen so low? Because you have witnessed the

success of a pretorian _coup de main_, you liken yourselves to the

Lower Empire! 'Tis quickly said, and meanly thought. But reflect, if

you can. Had the Lower Empire the compass, the electric battery, the

printing press, the newspaper, the locomotive, the electric telegraph?

So many wings to bear man aloft, which the Lower Empire did not

possess! The nineteenth century soars, where the Lower Empire crawled.

Are you aware of this? What! Shall we see once more the Empress Zoé,

Roman Argyrio, Nicephorus Logothetes, Michael Calafates? Nonsense! Do

you imagine that Providence repeats itself so tamely? Do you believe

that God keeps repeating himself?

Let us have faith! Let us speak with decision! Self-irony is the

beginning of baseness. It is by speaking with decision that we become

good, that we become great. Yes, the enfranchisement of intellects, and

the consequent enfranchisement of nations, this was the sublime task

that the nineteenth century was performing in conjunction with France;

for the twofold providential work of the time and of men, of maturation

and of action, was blended in the common labour, and the great epoch

had for its true home the great nation.

O my country! it is at this moment, when I see you bleeding, inanimate,

your head hanging, your eyes closed, your mouth open, and no words

issuing therefrom, the marks of the whip upon your shoulders, the nails

of the executioner's shoes imprinted upon your body, naked and ashamed,

and like a thing deprived of life, an object of hatred, of derision,

alas! it is at this moment, my country, that the heart of the exile

overflows with love and respect for you!

You lie there motionless. The minions of despotism and oppression

laugh, and enjoy the haughty illusion that you are no longer to be

feared. Fleeting joy! The peoples that are in the dark forget the past;

they see only the present, and despise you. Forgive them, they know not

what they do. Despise you! Great Heaven! despise France? And who are

they? What language do they speak? What books have they in their hands?

What names do they know by heart? What is the placard pasted on the

walls of their theatres? What forms do their arts assume, their laws,

their manners, their clothing, their pleasures, their fashions? What is

the great date for them, as for us? '89! If they take France from out

their hearts, what remains to them? O my people! Though it be fallen

and fallen for ever, is Greece despised? Is Italy despised? Is France

despised? Look at those breasts, they are your nurse; look at that

womb, it is your mother.

If she sleeps, if she is in a lethargy, silence, and off with your hat.

If she is dead, to your knees!

The exiles are scattered; destiny has blasts which disperse men like a

handful of ashes. Some are in Belgium, in Piedmont, in Switzerland,

where they do not enjoy liberty; others are in London, where they have

no roof to shelter them. One, a peasant, has been torn from his native

field; another, a soldier, has only a fragment of his sword, which was

broken in his hand; another, an artisan, is ignorant of the language of

the country, he is without clothes and without shoes, he knows not if

he shall eat food to-morrow; another has left behind him a wife and

children, a dearly loved group, the object of his labour, and the joy

of his life; another has an old mother with grey hairs, who weeps for

him; another an old father, who will die without seeing him again;

another is a lover,--he has left behind him some adored being, who will

forget him; they raise their heads and they hold out their hands to one

another; they smile; there is no nation that does not stand aside with

respect as they pass, and contemplate with profound emotion, as one of

the noblest spectacles which destiny can offer to men, all those serene

consciences, all those broken hearts.

They suffer and are silent; in them the citizen has sacrificed the man;

they look with firmness on adversity, they do not cry out even under

the pitiless rod of misfortune: _Civis Romanus sum!_ But at eve, when

one dreams,--when everything in the strange city of the stranger is

involved in melancholy, for what seems cold by day becomes funereal in

twilight,--but at night, when sleep does not close one's eyes, hearts

the most stoical open to mourning and dejection. Where are the little

ones? who will give them bread? who will give them their father's kiss?

where is the wife? where is the mother? where is the brother? where are

they all? And the songs which at eventide they used to hear, in their

native tongue, where are they? where is the wood, the tree, the forest

path, the roof filled with nests, the church tower surrounded by tombs?

Where is the street, the faubourg, the lamp burning bright before the

door, the friends, the workshop, the trade, the customary toil? And the

furniture put up for sale, the auction invading the domestic sanctuary!

Oh! these eternal adieux! Destroyed, dead, thrown to the four winds,

that moral existence which is called the family hearth, and which is

composed not only of loving converse, of caresses and embraces, but of

hours, of habits, of friendly visits, of joyous laughter, of the

pressure of the hand, of the view from certain windows, of the position

of certain furniture, of the arm-chair where the grandsire used to sit,

of the carpet on which the first-born used to play! Flown away for ever

are those objects which bore the imprint of one's daily life! Vanished

are the visible forms of one's souvenirs! There are in grief private

and secret recesses, where the most lofty courage bends. The Roman

orator put forth his head without flinching to the knife of the

centurion Lenas, but he wept when he thought of his house demolished by

Clodius.

The exiles are silent, or, if they complain, it is only among

themselves. As they know one another, and are doubly brothers, having

the same fatherland and sharing the same proscription, they tell one

another their sufferings. He who has money shares it with those who

have none, he who has firmness imparts it to those who lack it. They

exchange recollections, aspirations, hopes. They turn, their arms

extended in the darkness towards those they have left behind. Oh! how

happy they who think no more of us! Every man suffers and at times

waxes wroth. The names of all the executioners are engraven in the

memory of all. Each has something to curse,--Mazas, the hulk, the

dungeon, the informer who betrayed, the spy who watched, the gendarme

who arrested him, Lambessa, where one has a friend, Cayenne, where one

has a brother; but there is one thing that is blessed by all, and that

is thou, France!

Oh! a complaint, a word against thee, France! No! no! one's country is

never so deeply fixed in the heart as when one is torn from it by

exile.

They will do their whole duty, with a tranquil brow and unshaken

perseverance. Never to see thee again is their sorrow, never to forget

thee their joy.

Ah, what grief! And after eight months it is in vain that we say to

ourselves that these things are so; it is in vain that we look around

us and see the spire of Saint-Michael's instead of the Pantheon, and

Saint-Gudule instead of Notre-Dame,--we cannot believe it.

It is, however, true, it cannot be denied, we must admit it, we must

acknowledge it, even though we expire of humiliation and despair,--that

which is lying there, on the ground, is the nineteenth century, is

France!

And it is this Bonaparte who has caused all this ruin!

And it is in the very centre of the greatest nation upon earth! it is

in the midst of the greatest century of all history, that this man has

suddenly risen and has triumphed! To seize upon France as his prey,

great Heaven! What the lion would not dare to do, the ape has done!

what the eagle would have dreaded to seize in his talons, the parrot

has taken in his claws! What! Louis XI failed! Richelieu destroyed

himself in the attempt! Even Napoleon was unequal to it! In a single

day, between night and morning, the absurd became the possible! All

that was axiomatic has become chimerical. All that was false has become

living fact. What! the most brilliant concourse of men! the most

magnificent movements of ideas! the most formidable sequence of events!

a thing that no Titian could have controlled, that no Hercules could

have turned aside,--the human flood in full course, the French wave

sweeping onward, civilization, progress, intelligence, revolution,

liberty,--he stopped it all one fine morning, stopped it short, he,

this mask, this dwarf, this aborted Tiberius, this nothing!

God was advancing. Louis Bonaparte, his plume on his head, blocked his

path and said to God: "Thou shalt go no farther!"

God halted.

And you fancy that this is so! and you imagine that this plebiscite

exists, that this constitution of some day or other in January exists,

that this Senate exists, that this Council of State and this Corps

Législatif exist! You fancy that there is a lackey who is called

Rouher, a valet who is called Troplong, a eunuch who is called Baroche,

and a sultan, a pacha, a master who is called Louis Bonaparte! You do

not see, then, that all this is a chimera! you do not see that the

2nd of December is nothing but an immense illusion, a pause, a

breathing-space, a sort of drop-curtain behind which God, that

marvellous scene-shifter, is preparing and constructing the last act,

the supreme, triumphal act of the French Revolution! You gaze stupidly

at the curtain, at the things painted on the coarse canvas, this one's

nose, that one's epaulettes, the great sabre of a third, those belaced

venders of _eau de Cologne_ whom you call generals, those _poussahs_

whom you call magistrates, those worthy men whom you call senators,

this mixture of caricatures and spectres, and you take them all for

realities! And you do not hear beyond them, in the shadow, that hollow

sound! you do not hear some one going and coming! you do not see that

curtain quiver in the breath of Him who is behind!

THE END.

Napoleon the Little · 第 8 / 8 章