JOHN MUIR

I believe that John Muir’s name is destined to be immortal through his

writings on mountains, forests, rivers, meadows and the sentiment of the

animal and plant life they contain. I believe that no one else has ever

lived with just the same sentiment toward trees and flowers and the

works of nature in general as that which John Muir manifested in his

life, his conversations and his writings.

In the splendid journey which I had the privilege of taking with him to

Alaska in 1896 I first became aware of his passionate love of nature in

all its forms and his reverence for it as the direct handiwork of the

Creator. He retained from his early religious training under his father

this belief, which is so strongly expressed in the Old Testament, that

all the works of nature are directly the works of God. In this sense I

have never known any one whose nature-philosophy was more thoroughly

theistic; at the same time he was a thorough-going evolutionist and

always delighted in my own evolutionary studies, which I described to

him from time to time in the course of our journeyings and

conversations.

It was in Alaska that he quoted the lines from Goethe’s “Wilhelm

Meister” which inspired all his travels:

Keep not standing fixed and rooted,

Briskly venture, briskly roam;

Head and hand, where’er thou foot it,

And stout heart are still at home.

In each land the sun doth visit,

We are gay whate’er betide,

To give room for wandering is it

That the world was made so wide.

Another sentiment of his regarding trees and flowers always impressed

me: that was his attributing to them a personality, an individuality,

such as we associate with certain human beings and animals, but rarely

with plants. To him a tree was something not only to be loved but to be

respected and revered. I well remember his intense indignation over the

proposal by his friend Charles S. Sargent to substitute the name

_Magnolia fœtida_ for _Magnolia grandiflora_ on the ground of priority.

He quoted Sargent as saying, “After all, ‘what’s in a name?’” and

himself as replying, “There is everything in the name; why inflict upon

a beautiful and defenseless plant for all time the stigma of such a name

as _Magnolia fœtida_? You yourself would not like to have your own name

changed from Charles S. Sargent to ‘the malodorous Sargent.’”

John Muir’s incomparable literary style did not come to him easily, but

as the result of the most intense effort. I observed his methods of

writing in connection with two of his books upon which he was engaged

during the years 1911 and 1912. He came to our home on the Hudson in

June, 1911, after the Yale commencement, where he had received the

degree of LL.D. on June 21. He brought with him his new silken hood, in

which he said he had looked very grand in the commencement parade. On

Friday, June 21, he was established in Woodsome Lodge, a log cabin on a

secluded mountain height, to complete his volume on the Yosemite. Daily

he rose at 4.30 o’clock, and after a simple cup of coffee labored

incessantly on his two books, “The Yosemite” and “Boyhood and Youth.” It

was very interesting to watch how difficult it was for him. In my diary

of the time I find the following notes: “Knowing his beautiful and easy

style it is very interesting to learn how difficult it is for him; he

groans over his labors, he writes and rewrites and interpolates. He

loves the simplest English language and admires most of all Carlyle,

Emerson, and Thoreau. He is a very firm believer in Thoreau and starts

my reading deeply of this author. He also loves his Bible and is

constantly quoting it, as well as Milton and Burns. In his attitude

toward nature, as well as in his special gifts and abilities, Muir

shares many qualities with Thoreau. First among these is his mechanical

ability, his fondness for the handling of tools; second, his close

identification with nature; third, his interpretation of the religious

spirit of nature; fourth, his happiness in solitude with nature; fifth,

his lack of sympathy with crowds of people; sixth, his intense love of

animals.” Thoreau’s quiet residence at Walden is to be contrasted with

Muir’s world-wide journeyings from Scotland to Wisconsin; his penniless

journey down the Mississippi to Louisiana, Florida, across Panama, and

northward into California in its early grandeur; his establishment of

the sawmill, showing again his mechanical ability, as a means of

livelihood in the Yosemite; his climbs in the high Sierras and discovery

of still living glaciers; his eagerness to see the largest glaciers of

Alaska and his several journeys and sojourns there; his wandering all

over the great western and eastern forests of the United States; his

visits to special forests in Europe; his world tour, without

preconceived plan, including the wondrous forests of Africa, Australia,

New Zealand and Asia. Finally, his very last great journey.

When starting out on this South American journey, from which I among

other friends tried to dissuade him, he often quoted the phrase, “I

never turn back.” Although he greatly desired to have a comrade on this

journey and often urged me to accompany him, he finally was compelled to

start out alone, quoting Milton: “I have chosen the lonely way.” On July

26 I said good-by to this very dear friend, leaving him to work on his

books and prepare for the long journey to South America, especially to

see the forests of Araucaria. I know that at this time he had little

intention of going on to Africa. It was impulse that led him from the

east coast of South America to take a long northward journey in order to

catch a steamer for the Cape of Good Hope.

Among the personal characteristics which stand out like crystal in the

minds and hearts of his friends were his hatred of shams and his scorn

of the conventions of life, his boldness and fearlessness of attack,

well illustrated in his assault on the despoilers of the Hetch Hetchy

Valley of the Yosemite, whom he loved to characterize as “thieves and

robbers.” It was a great privilege to be associated with him in this

campaign. But certainly his chief characteristic was his intimacy with

nature and passionate love of its beauties; also, I believe, his

marvelous insight into the creative powers of nature, closely interwoven

with his deep religious sentiments and beliefs. Like John Burroughs in

many of his characteristics, in others he was totally different, and

these differences I attribute to the racial antecedents of the two men,

as studied in the “Racial Soul of John Burroughs.”

There were published in the New York _Evening Mail_ some verses by

Charles L. Edson with which I would close this all too brief tribute:

John o’ the mountains, wonderful John,

Is past the summit and traveling on:

The turn of the trail on the mountain side,

A smile and “Hail!” where the glaciers slide,

A streak of red where the condors ride,

And John is over the Great Divide.

John o’ the mountains camps to-day

On a level spot by the Milky Way;

And God is telling him how He rolled

The smoking earth from the iron mold,

And hammered the mountains till they were cold,

And planted the Redwood trees of old.

And John o’ the mountains says: “I knew,

And I wanted to grapple the hand o’ you;

And now we’re sure to be friends and chums

And camp together till chaos comes.”

[Illustration:

HOWARD CROSBY BUTLER

]

HOWARD CROSBY BUTLER

1872–1922

Like Theodore Roosevelt, Butler was a man of many talents and each

talent was in the nature of a surprise to his friends. Under his

extremely quiet and gentle personality lay force of idealism and of

resolution, of courage and persistence which led him to great heights

as investigator, teacher, and explorer. It is in respect to this last

talent only that this “Impression” is written, because I spoke in the

memorial service at Graduate College with others who dwelt on his

other talents. As an archæological explorer Butler showed his

resourcefulness and powers of command in the most remarkable way.

Bedouins, Arabs, native Turks yielded to his quiet and persuasive

power, though he rarely raised his voice above a low monotone. Again

we turn to the language of Dante and of Homer to express appreciation

of this great man.

Impressions of great naturalists · 第 29 / 31 题