The foreboding soon came to be justified. On the 1st of March, 1894,

Gladstone delivered his last speech in the House of Commons. The speech

dealt with the action of the House of Lords on a subject of

comparatively slight importance. The Lords had rejected a measure

dealing with the constitution of parish councils, which had been passed

by the House of Commons. Gladstone spoke with severity in condemnation

of the course taken by the House of Lords. Towards the close of his

speech he said: "My duty terminates with calling the attention of this

House to a fact which it is really impossible to set aside, that we are

considering a part--an essential and inseparable part--of a question

enormously large, a question which has become profoundly a truth, a

question that will demand a settlement, and must at an early date

receive that settlement, from the highest authority." No one who was

present in the House when this declaration was made is ever likely to

lose the memory of the scene, although not all or even most of those

then present quite realized the full significance of Gladstone's words.

There were many in the House who did not at once understand that in the

words I have quoted the greatest Parliamentary leader of modern times

was speaking his farewell to public life. I remember well that a few

moments after Gladstone had finished his speech I met John Morley in one

of the lobbies, and I asked him if this was really to be taken as the

close of Gladstone's career, and he told me, with as much composure as

he could command, that in that speech we had heard the last of

Gladstone's Parliamentary utterances. That was indeed a memorable day in

the history of England, and a day at least equally memorable in the

history of Ireland.

I have had to dwell for a while on these historical facts, facts of

course known already to all my readers, as a prelude to the most

important passages in the Parliamentary career of Campbell-Bannerman.

When Gladstone resigned office and withdrew from public life, the

question of reconstituting the Liberal administration had to be taken

into account. There could be no doubt whatever that the Liberal

administration had been much weakened and even discredited by the manner

in which it had put up with the domineering action of the House of

Lords. The effect on public opinion was all the greater and the more

disheartening because it was generally understood that the absence of

any such action must have been due to the fact that some of Gladstone's

leading colleagues were not prepared to sustain him in the policy he was

anxious to carry out. There was therefore a state of something like

apathy in the minds of advanced Radicals with regard to any arrangements

which seemed likely to be made for the reconstruction of the Ministry.

The new administration was formed under the leadership of Lord Rosebery,

as Prime Minister, in the House of Lords, and that of Sir William

Harcourt, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons. There

can be little doubt that the composition of the new Ministry was

regarded as unsatisfactory by the more advanced Liberals in and outside

Parliament. The Liberal party is never of late years quite content with

an administration which has its Prime Minister in the House of Lords.

The real work must always be done in the House of Commons, and it is

obviously most inconvenient that the leader of the Government should be

one whose position will not allow him to have a seat in the

representative chamber. The condition of things is something like that

of an army whose Commander-in-Chief can never make his appearance in the

encampment or take part in any of the great battles. Even at that time

Lord Rosebery, although a most brilliant debater and a capable

administrator, was beginning to be regarded as one whose Liberalism

was somewhat losing color and whose whole heart was by no means in

the advanced policy of Gladstone. There was nothing better to be

done, however, at the time than to make the most of the altered

conditions, and the new Ministry went to work as well as it could.

Campbell-Bannerman, as Secretary for War, had an opportunity of proving

his genuine capacity for the duties of his important office. He

introduced a new and complete scheme of army reform, which, among other

and even more important changes, proposed to bring about the retirement

of the Duke of Cambridge from the post of Commander-in-Chief. The Duke

of Cambridge was even then a man far advanced in years, who had never in

his life shown any real capacity for the work of commanding an army, and

whose chief recommendation for so great a position must have been found

in the fact that he was a member of the royal family. The new measure

was making its way steadily enough through the House of Commons, and

every one was beginning to see that in Campbell-Bannerman the country

had found an administrator of a very high order. Suddenly, however, the

progress of the measure was interrupted by what seemed to be at first

only a trivial accident, of which the public in general were inclined to

take but little account. The army reform scheme had arrived at what is

known as the committee stage of its progress.

I do not desire to occupy the attention of my readers more than is

actually necessary with the mere technical details of Parliamentary

procedure, and I shall only explain that when a Bill reaches the

committee stage its general principle must have been already accepted by

the majority in the House, and the House then forms itself into

Committee for the purpose of discussing the mere details of the proposed

arrangements. During one of the sittings a Conservative member proposed

a motion declaring that the Government, or at least the War Office, had

not made proper provision for the supply of the material of cordite to

the army. This was so purely a technical question, concerning which only

soldiers and scientific men could be supposed to have had any means of

forming an opinion, that the House troubled itself very little about the

whole discussion. But when the House came to take a division on the

proposal, the Government was defeated by a majority of seven. This

defeat produced at first only a very slight effect on the House in

general. During the committee stage of a measure it is quite a matter of

ordinary occurrence that a Ministry should be defeated on some question

of mere arrangement and detail, and very few in the House of Commons

suspected on that occasion that such a vote was likely to bring with it

an important Parliamentary crisis. Campbell-Bannerman, however, took a

very different view of the event. He appears to have made up his mind

that the decision of the House was a distinct vote of censure on his

administration, and that he could not continue to hold office after so

marked a declaration of disapproval. Now, it may be taken for granted

that Campbell-Bannerman was not merely actuated by any personal feeling,

by any sense of mere grievance to himself, when he made up his mind to

this resolve. He saw clearly that the Government had lost the confidence

and the support of the country, and that the sooner the whole futile

attempt at administration under such conditions came to an end the

better it would be for the business of the State. He knew perfectly well

that the Liberal administration was falling to pieces, that its leading

members were no longer inspired alike by one great policy, that some of

its leaders had ceased to be Liberals in the traditional meaning of the

word, and that sooner or later the catastrophe must come. Those of

Campbell-Bannerman's colleagues who were as genuine and stanch Liberals

as he soon came into agreement with him as to the course that ought to

be pursued, and it was known before long in the House of Commons that

the Liberal Ministers had resigned their offices and that the

long-postponed appeal to the country was to be made at last. Thus for

the first time it became known to the public that Campbell-Bannerman was

already a power in political life.

Parliament was dissolved and the appeal to the country was made at the

general election which necessarily followed. Few Liberals had the

slightest doubt as to the result of the appeal. Some of the very

measures introduced by the fallen Government which had the strong

approval of many advanced Liberals had put certain powerful interests

and classes against those who represented this policy. Sir William

Harcourt's "death duties" had aroused the indignation of rich men here,

there, and everywhere. The measures which the same statesman had

endeavored to carry for putting the liquor trade under the control of

"local option" had turned the publicans into an organized opposition

against Liberal administrators. The result of the general election was

the defeat of the Liberal party, and the formation of a Conservative

Government with Lord Salisbury at its head holding office as Prime

Minister and Foreign Secretary at once, and with Arthur Balfour as First

Lord of the Treasury and leader of the House of Commons. The Liberals

were weakened in every sense, not merely by the fact that they had come

back to Parliament no longer as a Government but only as an Opposition.

They were rendered by their internal divisions too weak for effective

work as an Opposition. Lord Rosebery continued for the time to act as

leader of the Liberal party, while Sir William Harcourt of course became

leader of the Opposition in the House of Commons. It soon was quite

clear that the Liberal party could not work together so far as its

leaders were concerned. It was evident that men like Harcourt and John

Morley and Campbell-Bannerman could not act in any cordial union with

Lord Rosebery and those Liberals who accepted Lord Rosebery's policy.

The result of all this was that Lord Rosebery resigned the leadership of

the party and has ever since seemed inclined to start a Liberal party of

his own, and that Sir William Harcourt did not believe he was likely to

receive such a united support in the House of Commons as would enable

him to maintain the leadership of the party with any satisfaction to

himself or the country. Harcourt therefore ceased to hold that position;

and now came for the first time the opportunity for Campbell-Bannerman.

He was chosen leader of the Liberal party in the House of Commons, and

he had before him, under all the conditions, a task which might well

have seemed hopeless. Lord Rosebery has, from that time to this,

delivered speeches all over the country which could only be interpreted

as the expression of his desire to call into being a new Liberal party

professing a political creed differing in its main characteristics from

that which had been proclaimed and carried on by Gladstone. Rosebery

renounced Home Rule for Ireland, and refused to act on Gladstone's

principles with regard to the protection of Christians in the East

against the alternating tyranny and neglect of the Ottoman Government.

Never within my recollection had any leader of a Liberal party in

the House of Commons come into a position of such difficulty and

disheartenment as that which Campbell-Bannerman had now to maintain. It

has often been the lot of the Liberal party to come into the House

of Commons with diminished numbers, and have to carry on as best

it could be done the battle against a Conservative Government of

overwhelming numerical strength. But the peculiar trouble which beset

Campbell-Bannerman was that he could not count upon the allegiance of

all his nominal followers. He knew that so long as he showed himself

determined to maintain the policy of Gladstone he could reckon without

fear on the support of such men as Harcourt and John Morley and Bryce.

But there were able men among those who occupied the front bench of

Opposition on whom he could not always count, men who were publicly

displaying themselves as the political associates or followers of Lord

Rosebery. Campbell-Bannerman went boldly and steadfastly on, never

faltering in the least. He upheld the time-honored creed of genuine

Liberalism, "never doubted clouds would break," and by his words and his

bearing inspired with fresh courage many a true Liberal whose faith was

not faltering, but whose hopes were sinking low. He proved himself quite

equal to the incessant work put upon him by his new position as leader

of the Liberal party in the House of Commons. He developed a capacity

for debate which only those who knew him well had ever before believed

him to possess. During all the wild excitement of Jingoism which

followed the movements of the war against the two South African

Republics, he never yielded to the temptation which overcame so many

other Liberals, the temptation to evade a passing unpopularity by

suppressing for the time his opinions on the policy of the war. He must

have been sorely tried again and again by the sayings and doings of some

who still professed to be members of the Liberal party in Parliament. A

new Liberal League was actually formed under the inspiration of Lord

Rosebery, and its object apparently was to create a new school of

Liberalism which should have nothing to do with the traditions of the

party and with the doctrines of men like Gladstone.

Now, if all this had been done in open and avowed antagonism to the

existing Liberal party, Campbell-Bannerman might have had a

comparatively easy task to undertake. He could have braced himself to do

sturdy battle against the promoters of internal disunion; could have set

the whole question plainly and squarely before the Liberal public

opinion of the country, and demanded a decisive judgment. But the

promoters of the new Liberal League did nothing of the kind. They

disclaimed any intention to create disunion in the party. They declared

that they were the very best of Liberals, and that nothing could exceed

their loyalty to the elected leaders of the Liberal party, and protested

that in whatever they did they were only trying to help and not to

hinder the work of these leaders. When one of the seceders, or supposed

seceders, delivered a speech at some public meeting in which he appeared

to repudiate the main principles of the Liberal creed, and an open split

in the party seemed to be imminent, some other member of the Liberal

League hastened to explain that the meaning of his noble friend or his

right honorable colleague had been totally misunderstood. He insisted

that the only motive of the previous orator was to promote the cordial

union of the Liberal party, and, to paraphrase the words of the medical

student in "Pickwick" after his quarrel with a fellow-student, that he

rather preferred Campbell-Bannerman to his own brother.

Campbell-Bannerman took all these performances with serene good humor.

As I have already said, those who know him are well aware that he has a

keen, quiet sense of humor, and I feel sure that he must often have

been much amused by the odd vagaries of those who would neither fall

into the ranks nor admit that they wanted to keep out of the ranks. He

has gone steadily on as he began since it became his duty to lead the

Liberal Opposition in the House of Commons. He has done the work of

leader honorably, patiently, consistently, and fearlessly, and he is

recognized as leader by all true Liberals, English, Scotch, and Welsh.

He has never fallen away in the slightest degree from the principles of

Gladstone where Home Rule and the other just claims of the Irish people

are concerned. He has kept the Liberal flag flying, and the whole

Liberalism of the country is already beginning to rally round him and to

recognize his leadership. Increasing responsibility has only developed

in him new capacity to maintain the responsible place. We may well

believe that he is destined to do great service yet to the Liberal

cause, and to win an honorable place in British history. When he first

became leader of the Liberal party in the House of Commons, he might

almost have seemed to be the leader of a lost cause, but he has fought

the fight bravely and will see the victory before long.

The Gresham Press,

UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED,

WOKING AND LONDON

* * * * *

BOOKS FOR RECREATION AND STUDY

PUBLISHED BY

T. FISHER UNWIN,

11, PATERNOSTER

BUILDINGS, LONDON

E.C.

F. C. GOULD'S FROISSART.

[Illustration: SIR BLUNDELL DE MAPLE PROTESTETH THAT TOWEL-HORSES WOULD

HAVE BETTER SERVED THE ARMY THAN THE HORSES THAT HAD BEEN BOUGHT IN

HUNGARY.]

TWO VOLUMES.

1. FROISSART'S MODERN CHRONICLES, 1901.

2. FROISSART'S MODERN CHRONICLES, 1902.

TOLD AND PICTURED BY F. C. GOULD.

_Each volume Cloth, foolscap 4to, 3s. 6d._

_Also a Fine Edition of Vol. II., limited to 50 copies, on Japan Paper,

numbered and signed, 21s. net._

"The second volume of Mr. F. C. Gould's 'Froissart's Modern

Chronicles' is fully equal to the first. The rich vein of pure

gold, which the artist-author has struck, is far from exhausted.

F. C. G. ranks easily first among English political

caricaturists; we doubt, indeed, if he is surpassed by any

living exponent of his very special craft."--_Daily Telegraph._

"Mr. Gould, I think, may well be 'orgulous' in having written a

delightful work of light satire, in which, as in all he does,

there is never a foul stroke. No words of mine can paint the joy

of the lover of humorous pencil-work, who shall get hold of the

'Modern Chronicles.' It is, after all, as a picture-maker that

F. C. G. stands entirely alone."--_Vanity Fair._

"The drollest, most ingenious, and most versatile of living

political caricaturists."--_World._

T. FISHER UNWIN, 11 PATERNOSTER BUILDINGS, LONDON, E.C.

Recent Volumes in the

STORY OF THE NATIONS

A SERIES OF POPULAR HISTORIES.

_Each Volume complete with Maps, many Illustrations, and an Index. Large

crown 8vo, fancy cloth, gold lettered, or Library Edition, dark cloth,

burnished red top, 5s. each. Or may be had in half Persian, cloth sides,

gilt tops: Price on Application._

49. Austria. By SIDNEY WHITMAN

50. Modern England before the Reform Bill. By JUSTIN McCARTHY.

51. China. With a New Chapter on Recent Events. By Prof. R. K.

DOUGLAS.

52. Modern England under Queen Victoria. By JUSTIN McCARTHY.

53. Modern Spain, 1878-1898. By MARTIN A. S. HUME, F.R.H.S., Author of

"Sir Walter Ralegh," &c.

54. Modern Italy, 1758-1898. By PIETRO ORSI, Professor of History in

the R. Liceo Foscarini, Venice. With over 40 Illustrations and Maps.

55. Norway. By Professor HJALMAR H. BOYESEN, Author of "Idylls of

Norway."

56. Wales. By OWEN EDWARDS.

_IN PREPARATION._

The United States of America, 1783-1900. By A. C. M'LAUGHLIN. In 2

Volumes.

The Papal Monarchy: From Gregory the Great to Boniface VIII. By Rev.

W. BARRY.

Mediæval Rome. By WILLIAM MILLER.

Buddhist India. By T. W. RHYS DAVIDS.

The Story of Greece (to the Roman Occupation). By E. S. SHUCKBURGH.

The Story of Greece (from the Roman Occupation to A.D. 1453). By E. S.

SHUCKBURGH.

CLARA HOPGOOD

BY MARK RUTHERFORD

_Edited_ BY REUBEN SHAPCOTT

_Second Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

(_The Third and Cheaper Edition is now ready, Crown 8vo, cloth_, 3s.

6d.)

"The writer who goes by the name of Mark Rutherford is not the most

popular novelist of his time by any means. There are writers with names

which that recluse genius has never heard of, probably, whose stories

give palpitations to thousands of gentle souls, while his own are

quietly read by no more than as many hundreds. Yet his publisher never

announces a new story by the Author of 'Mark Rutherford's

Autobiography,' and 'The Revolution in Tanner's Lane,'--which we believe

to be one of the most remarkable bits of writing that these times can

boast of--without strongly exciting the interest of many who know books

as precious stones are known in Hatton Garden.... 'Clara Hopgood' is

entirely out of the way of all existing schools of novel-writing.... Had

we to select a good illustration of 'Mark's way' as distinguished from

the way of modern storytellers in general, we should point to the

chapter in which Baruch visits his son Benjamin in this narration.

Nothing could be more simple, nothing more perfect."--_Pall Mall

Gazette._

A FIRST FLEET FAMILY: BEING A HITHERTO UNPUBLISHED NARRATIVE OF CERTAIN

REMARKABLE ADVENTURES COMPILED FROM THE PAPERS OF SERGEANT WILLIAM DEW,

OF THE MARINES

BY

LOUIS BECKE and WALTER JEFFERY

_Second Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"As convincingly real and vivid as a narrative can be."--_Sketch._

"No maker of plots could work out a better story of its kind,

nor balance it more neatly."--_Daily Chronicle._

"A book which describes a set of characters varied and so

attractive as the more prominent figures in this romance, and a

book so full of life, vicissitude, and peril, should be welcomed

by every discreet novel reader."--_Yorkshire Post._

"A very interesting tale, written in clear and vigorous

English."--_Globe._

"The novel is a happy blend of truth and fiction, with a purpose

that will be appreciated by many readers; it has also the most

exciting elements of the tale of adventure."--_Morning Post._

THE TALES OF JOHN OLIVER HOBBES

With a Frontispiece Portrait of the Author

_Second Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"The cleverness of them all is extraordinary."--_Guardian._

"The volume proves how little and how great a thing it is to

write a 'Pseudonym.' Four whole 'Pseudonyms' ... are easily

contained within its not extravagant limits, and these four

little books have given John Oliver Hobbes a recognized position

as a master of epigram and narrative comedy."--_St. James's

Gazette._

"As her star has been sudden in its rise so may it stay long

with us! Some day she may give us something better than these

tingling, pulsing, mocking, epigrammatic morsels."--_Times._

"There are several literary ladies, of recent origin, who have

tried to come up to the society ideal; but John Oliver Hobbes is

by far the best writer of them all, by far the most capable

artist in fiction.... She is clever enough for

anything."--_Saturday Review._

THE HERB MOON

BY JOHN OLIVER HOBBES

_Third Edition, Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"The jaded reader who needs sauce for his literary appetite

cannot do better than buy 'The Herb Moon.'"--_Literary World._

"A book to hail with more than common pleasure. The epigrammatic

quality, the power of rapid analysis and brilliant presentation

are there, and added to these a less definable quality, only to

be described as charm.... 'The Herb Moon' is as clever as most

of its predecessors, and far less artificial."--_Athenæum._

THE STICKIT MINISTER AND SOME COMMON MEN

BY S. R. CROCKETT

_Eleventh Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"Here is one of the books which are at present coming singly and

at long intervals, like early swallows, to herald, it is to be

hoped, a larger flight. When the larger flight appears, the

winter of our discontent will have passed, and we shall be able

to boast that the short story can make a home east as well as

west of the Atlantic. There is plenty of human nature--of the

Scottish variety, which is a very good variety--in 'The Stickit

Minister' and its companion stories; plenty of humour, too, of

that dry, pawky kind which is a monopoly of 'Caledonia, stern

and wild'; and, most plentiful of all, a quiet perception and

reticent rendering of that underlying pathos of life which is to

be discovered, not in Scotland alone, but everywhere that a man

is found who can see with the heart and the imagination as well

as the brain. Mr. Crockett has given us a book that is not

merely good, it is what his countrymen would call 'by-ordinar

good,' which, being interpreted into a tongue understanded of

the southern herd, means that it is excellent, with a somewhat

exceptional kind of excellence."--_Daily Chronicle._

THE LILAC SUN-BONNET

BY S. R. CROCKETT

_Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"Mr. Crockett's 'Lilac Sun-Bonnet' 'needs no bush.' Here is a

pretty love tale, and the landscape and rural descriptions carry

the exile back into the Kingdom of Galloway. Here, indeed, is

the scent of bog-myrtle and peat. After inquiries among the

fair, I learn that of all romances, they best love, not

'sociology,' not 'theology,' still less, open manslaughter, for

a motive, but just love's young dream, chapter after chapter.

From Mr. Crockett they get what they want, 'hot with,' as

Thackeray admits that he liked it."--Mr. ANDREW LANG in

_Longman's Magazine_.

THE RAIDERS

BY S. R. CROCKETT

_Eighth Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth_, 6s.

"A thoroughly enjoyable novel, full of fresh, original, and

accurate pictures of life long gone by."--_Daily News._

"A strikingly realistic romance."--_Morning Post._

"A stirring story.... Mr. Crockett's style is charming. My

Baronite never knew how musical and picturesque is

Scottish-English till he read this book."--_Punch._

British Political Leaders · 第 14 / 15 段