CHAPTER VIL

SCHOOLBOYS' BLUNDERS.

THE blunders of the examined

form a fruitful source of

amusement for us all, and many

comical instances have been published.

The mistakes which are constantly

occurring must naturally be innumerable, but

only a few of them rise to the dignity of

a blunder. If it be difficult to define a

blunder, probably the best illustration of

what it is will be found in the answers of

the boys under examination. All classes

of blunders may be found among these.

There are those which show confusion of

knowledge, and those which exhibit an

insight into the heart of the matter while

blundering in the form. Two very good

examples occur to one's mind, but it is to

be feared that they owe their origin to

some keen spirit of mature years. ``What

<p 158>is Faith?--The quality by which we are

enabled to believe that which we know is

untrue.'' Surely this must have

emanated from a wit! Again, the whole

Homeric question is condensed into the

following answer: ``Some people say that

the Homeric poems were not written by

Homer, but by another man of the same

name.'' If this is a blunder, who would

not wish to blunder so?

A large class of schoolboys' blunders

consist in a confusion of words somewhat

alike in sound, a confusion that is apt to

follow some of us through life. ``Matins''

has been mixed up with ``pattens,'' and

described as something to wear on the

feet. Nonconformists are said to be

persons who cannot form anything, and

a tartan is assumed to be an inhabitant

of Tartary. The gods are believed by

one boy to live on nectarines, and by

another to imbibe ammonia. The same

desire to make an unintelligible word

express a meaning which has caused the

recognised but absurd spelling of _sovereign_

(more wisely spelt _sovran_ by Milton)

shows itself in the form ``Tea-trarck''

<p 159>explained as the title of Herod given to

him because he invented or was fond of

tea.[13] A still finer confusion of ideas is to

be found in an answer reported by Miss

Graham in the _University Correspondent_:

``Esau was a man who wrote fables, and

who sold the copyright to a publisher for

a bottle of potash.''

[13] _Cornhill Magazine_, June 1888, pp. 619-28.

The following etymological guesses are

not so good, but they are worthy of

registration. One boy described a blackguard

as ``one who has been a shoeblack,'' while

another thought he was ``a man dressed

in black.'' ``Polite'' is said to be derived

from ``Pole,'' owing to the affability of the

Polish race. ``Heathen'' means ``covered

with heath''; but this explanation is

commonplace when compared with the

brilliant guess--``Heathen, from Latin

`h<ae>thum,' faith, and `en,' not.''

The boy who explained the meaning of

the words _fort_ and _fortress_ must have had

rather vague ideas as to masculine and

feminine nouns. He wrote: ``A fort is

a place to put men in, and a fortress a

place to put women in.''

<p 160>

The little book entitled _English as she

is Taught_, which contains a considerable

number of genuine answers to examination

questions given in American schools, with

a Commentary by Mark Twain, is full of

amusing matter. A large proportion of

these answers are of a similar character

to those just enumerated, blunders which

have arisen from a confusion caused by

similarity of sound in the various words,

thus, ``In Austria the principal occupation

is gathering Austrich feathers.'' The

boy who propounded this evidently had

much of the stock in trade required

for the popular etymologist. ``Ireland is

called the Emigrant Isle because it is

so beautiful and green.'' ``Gorilla warfare

was where men rode on gorillas.'' ``The

Puritans found an insane asylum in the

wilds of America.''

Some of the answers are so funny that

it is almost impossible to guess at the

train of thought which elicited them, as,

``Climate lasts all the time, and weather

only a few days.'' ``Sanscrit is not used

so much as it used to be, as it went out

of use 1500 B.C.'' The boy who affirmed

<p 161>that ``The imports of a country are the

things that are paid for; the exports are

the things that are not,'' did not put the

Theory of Exchange in very clear form.

The knowledge of physiology and of

medical subjects exhibited by some of the

examined is very amusing. One boy

discovered a new organ of the body called

a chrone: ``He had a chronic disease--

something the matter with the chrone.''

Another had a strange notion of how to

spell _craniology_, for he wrote ``Chonology

is the science of the brane.'' But best

of all is the knowledge of the origin of

Bright's disease, shown by the boy who

affirms that ``John Bright is noted for an

incurable disease.''

Much of the blundering of the

examined must be traced to the absurd

questions of the examiners--questions

which, as Mark Twain says, ``would

oversize nearly anybody's knowledge.''

And the wish which every examinee

has to bring in some subject which he

supposes himself to know is perceptible

in many answers. The date 1492 seems

to be impressed upon every American

<p 162>child's memory, and he cannot rest until

he has associated it with some fact, so

we learn that George Washington was

born in 1492, that St. Bartholomew

was massacred in that year, that ``the

Brittains were the Saxons who entered

England in 1492 under Julius C<ae>sar,''

and, to cap all, that the earth is 1492

miles in circumference.

Many of the best-known examination

jokes are associated with Scriptural

characters. One of the best of these, if also

one of the best known, is that of the man

who, paraphrasing the parable of the Good

Samaritan, and quoting his words to the

innkeeper, ``When I come again I will

repay you,'' added, ``This he said knowing

that he should see his face again no more.''

A School Board boy, competing for one

of the Peek prizes, carried this confusion

of widely different events even farther.

He had to write a short biography of

Jonah, and he produced the following:

``He was the father of Lot, and had two

wives. One was called Ishmale and the

other Hagher; he kept one at home, and

he turned the other into the dessert, when

<p 163>she became a pillow of salt in the daytime

and a pillow of fire at night.'' The sketch

of Moses is equally unhistoric: ``Mosses

was an Egyptian. He lived in an ark

made of bullrushes, and he kept a golden

calf and worshipped braizen snakes, and

et nothing but kwales and manna for forty

years. He was caught by the hair of his

head, while riding under the bough of a

tree, and he was killed by his son Absalom

as he was hanging from the bough.'' But

the ignorance of the schoolboy was quite

equalled by the undergraduate who was

asked ``Who was the first king of Israel?''

and was so fortunate as to stumble on

the name of Saul. Finding by the face

of the examiner that he had hit upon

the right answer, he added confidentially,

``Saul, also called Paul.''

The American child, however, managed

to cover a larger space of time in his

confusion when he said, ``Elijah was a good

man, who went up to heaven without

dying, and threw his cloak down for

Queen Elizabeth to step over.''

A boy was asked in an examination,

``What did Moses do with the tabernacle?''

<p 164>and he promptly answered, ``He chucked

it out of the camp.'' The scandalised

examiner asked the boy what he meant,

and was told that it was so stated in the

Bible. On being challenged for the verse,

the boy at once repeated ``And Moses

took the tabernacle and _pitched_ it without

the camp'' (Exod. xxxiii. 7).

The book might be filled with

extraordinary instances of school translation,

but room must be found for one beautiful

specimen quoted by Moore in his

_Diary_. A boy having to translate

``they ascended by ladders'' into Latin,

turned out this, ``ascendebant per

adolescentiores'' (the comparative degree of

lad, _i.e_., ladder).

The late Mr. Barrett, Musical Examiner

to the Society of Arts, gave some curious

instances of blundering in his report on

the Examinations of 1887, which is printed

in the _Programme of the Society's

Examinations for_ 1888:--

``There were occasional indications that

the terms were misunderstood. `Presto'

signifies `turn over,' `Lento' `with style.'

`Staccato' was said to mean `stick on

<p 165>the notes,' or `notes struck and at once

raised.'

``The names of composers in order of

time were generally correctly done, but

the particulars concerning the musicians

were rather startling. Thus Purcell was

said to have written, among other things,

an opera called _Ebdon and Eneas_; one

stated that he was born 1543 and died

1595, probably confusing him with Tallis,

that he wrote masses and reformed the

church music; another that he was the

organist of King's College Chapel, and

wrote madrigals. One stated that he was

born 1568 and died 1695; another, not

knowing that he had so long passed the

allotted period of man's existence, gave

his dates 1693, 1685, thus giving him no

limit of existence at all. One said he

was a German, born somewhere in the

nineteenth century, which statement

another confirmed by giving his dates as

1817-1846; and, further, credited him

with the composition of _The Woman of

Samaria_, and as having transposed plain-

song from tenor to bass. Bach is said to

have been the founder of the `Thames

<p 166>School Lipsic,' the composer of the

_Seasons_, the celebrated writer of opera

comique, born 16--, and having gone

through an operation for one of his fingers,

turned his attention to composition, wrote

operas, and, lastly, that he was born in

1756, and died 1880, and that his fame

rests on his passions.

``The facts about Handel are pretty

correct; but we find that Weber wrote

_Parsifal, The Flying Dutchman, Der Ring

der Nibulengon_. His dates are 1813-1883.

Mendelssohn was born 1770, died 1827

(Beethoven's dates), studied under Hadyn

(_sic_), and that he composed many operas.

Gounod is said to be `a rather modern

musician'; he wrote _Othello, Three Holy

Children_, besides _Faust_ and other works.

Among the names given as the composer

of _Nozze di Figaro_ are Donizetti, William

Sterndale Bennett, Gunod, and Sir Mickall

Costa. The particulars concerning the

real composer are equally interesting.

(1) His name is spelt Mozzart, Mosarde,

etc. (2) He was a well-known Italian, wrote

_Medea_, and others. (3) His first opera

was _Idumea, or Idomeo_. (4) He composed

<p 167>_Lieder ohne worte, Don Pasquale, Don

Govianna_, the _Zauberfloat, Feuges_, and

his _Requiem_ is the crowning glory of his

`marvellious carere.' (5) He was a

German, `born 1756, at a very early age.'

If the dates given by another writer be

true (born 1795, died 1659), it is certain

that he must have died before he was

born.''

Mr. Barrett again reported in 1889

some of the strange opinions of those

who came to him to be examined:--

``The answers to the question `Who was

Rossini? What influence did he exercise

over the art of music in his time?' brought

to light much curious and interesting

intelligence. His nationality was various.

He was `a German by birth, but was born

at Pesaro in Italy'; `he was born in

1670 and died 1826'; he was a `Frenchman,'

`a noted writer of the French,'

the place of nativity was `Pizzarro in

Genoa'; he was `an Italian, and made

people feel drunk with the sparke and

richness of his melody'; he composed

_Oberon, Don Giovanni; Der Fri<e:>schutz_,

and _Stabet Matar_. He was `an accom<p 168>plished

writer of violin music and produced

some of the prettiest melodies';

it is `to him we owe the extension of

chords struck together in ar peggio'; he

was `the founder of some institution or

another'; `the great aim of his life was

to make the music he wrote an interpretation

of the words it was set to'; he

`broke many of the laws of music'; he

`considerable altered the stage'; he

`was noted for using many instruments

not invented before'; in his `composition

he used the chromatic scale very

much, and goes very deep in harmony';

he `was the first taking up the style, and

therefore to make a great change in

music'; he was `the cause of much censure

and bickering through his writings';

he `promoted a less strict mode of writing

and other beneficial things'; and, finally,

`Giachono Rossini was born at Pezarro

in 1792. In the year 1774 there was war

raging in Paris between the Gluckists and

Piccinists. Gluck wanted to do away with

the old restraint of the Italian aria, and

improve opera from a dramatic point of

view. Piccini remained true to the old

<p 169>Italian style, and Rossini helped him to

carry it on still further by his operas,

_Tancredi, William Tell_, and _Dorma del

Lago_.' ''

The child who gave the following brilliant

answer to the question, ``What was

the character of Queen Mary?'' must

have suffered herself from the troubles

supposed to be connected with the

possession of a stepmother: ``She was wilful

as a girl and cruel as a woman, but'' (adds

the pupil) ``what can you expect from any

one who had had five stepmothers?''

The greatest confusion among the

examined is usually to be found in the

answers to historical and geographical

questions. All that one boy knew about

Nelson was that he ``was buried in

St. Paul's Cathedral amid the groans of

a dying nation.'' The student who mixed

up Oliver Cromwell with Thomas Cromwell's

master Wolsey produced this strange

answer: ``Oliver Cromwell is said to have

exclaimed, as he lay a-dying, If I had

served my God as I served my king, He

would not have left me to mine enemies.''

Miss Graham relates in the _University

<p 170>Correspondent_ an answer which contains

the same confusion with a further one

added: ``Wolsey was a famous general

who fought in the Crimean War, and who,

after being decapitated several times, said

to Cromwell, Ah! if I had only served

you as you have served me, I would

not have been deserted in my old age.''

``The Spanish Armada,'' wrote a young

man of seventeen, ``took place in the

reign of Queen Anne; she married Philip

of Spain, who was a very cruel man.

The Spanish and the English fought very

bravely against each other. The English

wanted to conquer Spain. Several battles

were fought, in which hundreds of the

English and Spanish were defeated. They

lost some very large ships, and were at a

great loss on both sides.''

The following description of the Nile

by a schoolboy is very fine: ``The Nile is

the only remarkable river in the world.

It was discovered by Dr. Livingstone, and

it rises in Mungo Park.'' Constantinople

is described thus: ``It is on the Golden

Horn; a strong fortress; has a University,

and is the residence of Peter the Great.

<p 171>Its chief building is the Sublime Port.''

Amongst the additions to our geographical

knowledge may be mentioned that Gibraltar

is ``an island built on a rock,'' and

that Portugal can only be reached through

the St. Bernard's Pass ``by means of

sledges drawn by reindeer and dogs.''

``Turin is the capital of China,'' and

``Cuba is a town in Africa very difficult

of access.''

One of the finest answers ever given in

an examination was that of the boy who

was asked to repeat all he knew of Sir

Walter Raleigh. This was it: ``He introduced

tobacco into England, and while

he was smoking he exclaimed, `Master

Ridley, we have this day lighted such a

fire in England as shall never be put

out.' '' Can that, with any sort of justice,

be styled a blunder?

The rule that ``the King can do no

wrong'' was carried to an extreme length

when a schoolboy blunder of Louis XIV.

was allowed to change the gender of

a French noun. The King said ``un

carosse,'' and that is what it is now.

In Cotgrave's _Dictionary carosse_ appears

<p 172>as feminine, but M<e'>nage notes it as

having been changed from feminine to

masculine.

It has already been pointed out that

some of the blunders of the examined

are due to the absurdity of the questions

of the examiner. The following excellent

anecdote from the late Archdeacon Sinclair's

_Sketches of Old Times and Distant

Places_ (1875) shows that even when the

question is sound a difficulty may arise

by the manner of presenting it:--

``I was one day conversing with Dr.

Williams about schools and school

examinations. He said: `Let me give you

a curious example of an examination at

which I was present in Aberdeen. An

English clergyman and a Lowland Scotsman

visited one of the best parish schools

in that city. They were strangers, but the

master received them civilly, and inquired:

``Would you prefer that I should _speer_

these boys, or that you should _speer_ them

yourselves?'' The English clergyman

having ascertained that to _speer_ meant to

question, desired the master to proceed.

He did so with great success, and the

<p 173>boys answered numerous interrogatories

as to the Exodus from Egypt. The

clergyman then said he would be glad

in his turn to _speer_ the boys, and began:

``How did Pharaoh die?'' There was

a dead silence. In this dilemma the

Lowland gentleman interposed. ``I think,

sir, the boys are not accustomed to your

English accent,'' and inquired in broad

Scotch, ``Hoo did Phawraoh dee?'' Again

there was a dead silence, till the master

said: ``I think, gentlemen, you can't _speer_

these boys; I'll show you how.'' And he

proceeded: ``Fat cam to Phawraoh at his

hinder end?'' _i.e_., in his latter days. The

boys with one voice answered, ``He was

drooned''; and a smart little fellow added,

``Ony lassie could hae told you that.''

The master then explained that in the

Aberdeen dialect ``to dee'' means to die

a natural death, or to die in bed: hence

the perplexity of the boys, who knew that

Pharaoh's end was very different.' ''

The author is able to add to this chapter

a thoroughly original series of answers to

certain questions relating to acoustics,

light and heat, which Professor Oliver

<p 174>Lodge, F.R.S., has been so kind as to

communicate for this work, and which

cannot fail to be appreciated by his readers.

It must be understood that all these answers

are genuine, although they are not

given _verbatim et literatim_, and in some

instances one answer is made to contain

several blunders. Professor Lodge

expresses the opinion that the questions

might in some instances have been worded

better, so as to exclude several of the

misapprehensions, and therefore that the

answers may be of some service to future

setters of questions. He adds that of late

the South Kensington papers have become

more drearily correct and monotonous,

because the style of instruction now

available affords less play to exuberant

fancy untrammelled by any information

regarding the subject in hand.

1880.--ACOUSTICS, LIGHT AND HEAT

PAPER.

_Science and Art Department_.

The following are specimens of answers

given by candidates at recent examinations

in Acoustics, Light and Heat, held in

<p 175>connection with the Science and Art

Department, South Kensington. The

answers have not of course all been

selected from the same paper, neither

have they all been chosen for the same

reason.

_Question_ I.--State the relations existing

between the pressure, temperature, and

density of a given gas. How is it proved

that when a gas expands its temperature

is diminished?

_Answer_.--Now the answer to the first

part of this question is, that the square

root of the pressure increases, the square

root of the density decreases, and the

absolute temperature remains about the

same; but as to the last part of the

question about a gas expanding when its

temperature is diminished, I expect I am

intended to say I don't believe a word

of it, for a bladder in front of a fire

expands, but its temperature is not at all

diminished.

_Question_ 2.--If you walk on a dry path

between two walls a few feet apart, you

hear a musical note or ``ring'' at each

footstep. Whence comes this?

<p 176>

_Answer_.--This is similar to

phosphorescent paint. Once any sound gets

between two parallel reflectors or walls,

it bounds from one to the other and

never stops for a long time. Hence it is

persistent, and when you walk between

the walls you hear the sounds made by

those who walked there before you. By

following a muffin man down the passage

within a short time you can hear most

distinctly a musical note, or, as it is more

properly termed in the question, a ``ring''

at every (other) step.

_Question_ 3.--What is the reason that

the hammers which strike the strings of

a pianoforte are made not to strike the

middle of the strings? Why are the bass

strings loaded with coils of wire?

_Answer_.--Because the tint of the clang

would be bad. Because to jockey them

heavily.

_Question_ 4.--Explain how to determine

the time of vibration of a given tuning-

fork, and state what apparatus you would

require for the purpose.

_Answer_.--For this determination I

should require an accurate watch beating

<p 177>seconds, and a sensitive ear. I mount the

fork on a suitable stand, and then, as

the second hand of my watch passes the

figure 60 on the dial, I draw the bow

neatly across one of its prongs. I wait.

I listen intently. The throbbing air

particles are receiving the pulsations; the

beating prongs are giving up their original

force; and slowly yet surely the sound

dies away. Still I can hear it, but faintly

and with close attention; and now only

by pressing the bones of my head against

its prongs. Finally the last trace

disappears. I look at the time and leave

the room, having determined the time of

vibration of the common ``pitch'' fork.

This process deteriorates the fork

considerably, hence a different operation must

be performed on a fork which is only _lent_.

_Question_ 6.--What is the difference

between a ``real'' and a ``virtual'' image?

Give a drawing showing the formation of

one of each kind.

_Answer_.--You see a real image every

morning when you shave. You do not

see virtual images at all. The only people

who see virtual images are those people

<p 178>who are not quite right, like Mrs. A.

Virtual images are things which don't

exist. I can't give you a reliable drawing

of a virtual image, because I never saw

one.

_Question_ 8.--How would you disprove,

experimentally, the assertion that white

light passing through a piece of coloured

glass acquires colour from the glass? What

is it that really happens?

_Answer_.--To disprove the assertion (so

repeatedly made) that ``white light passing

through a piece of coloured glass acquires

colour from the glass,'' I would ask the

gentleman to observe that the glass has

just as much colour after the light has

gone through it as it had before. That is

what would really happen.

_Question_ 11.--Explain why, in order to

cook food by boiling, at the top of a high

mountain, you must employ a different

method from that used at the sea level.

_Answer_.--It is easy to cook food at the

sea level by boiling it, but once you get

above the sea level the only plan is to fry

it in its own fat. It is, in fact, impossible

to boil water above the sea level by any

<p 179>amount of heat. A different method,

therefore, would have to be employed to

boil food at the top of a high mountain,

but what that method is has not yet been

discovered. The future may reveal it to

a daring experimentalist.

_Question_ 12.--State what are the

conditions favourable for the formation of dew.

Describe an instrument for determining the

dew point, and the method of using it.

_Answer_.--This is easily proved from

question 1. A body of gas as it ascends

expands, cools, and deposits moisture; so

if you walk up a hill the body of gas inside

you expands, gives its heat to you, and

deposits its moisture in the form of dew

or common sweat. Hence these are the

favourable conditions; and moreover it

explains why you get warm by ascending

a hill, in opposition to the well-known

law of the Conservation of Energy.

_Question_ 13.--On freezing water in a

glass tube, the tube sometimes breaks.

Why is this? An iceberg floats with

1,000,000 tons of ice above the water

line. About how many tons are below

the water line?

<p 180>

_Answer_.--The water breaks the tube

because of capallarity. The iceberg

floats on the top because it is lighter,

hence no tons are below the water line.

Another reason is that an iceberg cannot

exceed 1,000,000 tons in weight: hence

if this much is above water, none is

below. Ice is exceptional to all other

bodies except bismuth. All other bodies

have 1090 feet below the surface and

2 feet extra for every degree centigrade.

If it were not for this, all fish would die,

and the earth be held in an iron grip.

P.S.--When I say 1090 feet, I mean

1090 feet per second.

_Question_ 14.--If you were to pour a

pound of molten lead and a pound of

molten iron, each at the temperature of

its melting point, upon two blocks of ice,

which would melt the most ice, and why?

_Answer_.--This question relates to

diathermancy. Iron is said to be a

diathermanous body (from _dia_, through, and

_thermo_, I heat), meaning that it gets heated

through and through, and accordingly

contains a large quantity of real heat.

Lead is said to be an athermanous body

<p 181>(from _a_, privative, and _thermo_, I heat),

meaning that it gets heated secretly or in

a latent manner. Hence the answer to

this question depends on which will get

the best of it, the real heat of the iron or

the latent heat of the lead. Probably the

iron will smite furthest into the ice, as

molten iron is white and glowing, while

melted lead is dull.

_Question_ 21.--A hollow indiarubber ball

full of air is suspended on one arm of a

balance and weighed in air. The whole

is then covered by the receiver of an air

pump. Explain what will happen as the

air in the receiver is exhausted.

_Answer_.--The ball would expand and

entirely fill the vessell, driving out all before

it. The balance being of greater density

than the rest would be the last to go, but

in the end its inertia would be overcome

and all would be expelled, and there would

be a perfect vacuum. The ball would

then burst, but you would not be aware of

the fact on account of the loudness of a

sound varying with the density of the place

in which it is generated, and not on that

in which it is heard.

<p 182>

_Question_ 27.--Account for the delicate

shades of colour sometimes seen on the

inside of an oyster shell. State and

explain the appearance presented when a

beam of light falls upon a sheet of glass

on which very fine equi-distant parallel

lines have been scratched very close to

one another.

_Answer_.--The delicate shades are due

to putrefaction; the colours always show

best when the oyster has been a bad one.

Hence they are considered a defect and

are called chromatic aberration.

The scratches on the glass will arrange

themselves in rings round the light, as any

one may see at night in a tram car.

_Question_ 29.--Show how the hypothenuse

face of a right-angled prism may be

used as a reflector. What connection is

there between the refractive index of a

medium and the angle at which an emergent

ray is totally reflected?

_Answer_.--Any face of any prism may

be used as a reflector. The connexion

between the refractive index of

a medium and the angle at which an

emergent ray does not emerge but is

<p 183>totally reflected is remarkable and not

generally known.

_Question_ 32.--Why do the inhabitants

of cold climates eat fat? How would you

find experimentally the relative quantities

of heat given off when equal weights of

sulphur, phosphorus, and carbon are

thoroughly burned?

_Answer_.--An inhabitant of cold climates

(called Frigid Zoans) eats fat principally

because he can't get no lean, also because

he wants to rise is temperature. But if

equal weights of sulphur phosphorus and

carbon are burned in his neighbourhood

he will give off eating quite so much. The

relative quantities of eat given off will

depend upon how much sulphur etc. is

burnt and how near it is burned to him.

If I knew these facts it would be an easy

sum to find the answer.

1881.

_Question_ 1.--Sound is said to travel

about four times as fast in water as in air.

How has this been proved? State your

reasons for thinking whether sound travels

faster or slower in oil than in water.

<p 184>

_Answer_(_a_).--Mr. Colladon, a gentleman

who happened to have a boat, wrote to a

friend called Mr. Sturm to borrow another

boat and row out on the other side of the

lake, first providing himself with a large

ear-trumpet. Mr. Colladon took a large

bell weighing some tons which he put

under water and hit furiously. Every time

he hit the bell he lit a fusee, and Mr.

Sturm looked at his watch. In this way

it was found out as in the question.

It was also done by Mr. Byott who sang

at one end of the water pipes of Paris,

and a friend at the other end (on whom he

could rely) heard the song as if it were a

chorus, part coming through the water and

part through the air.

(_b_) This is done by one person going into

a hall (? a well) and making a noise, and

another person stays outside and listens

where the sound comes from. When Miss

Beckwith saves life from drowning, her

brother makes a noise under water, and

she hearing the sound some time after can

calculate where he is and dives for him;

and what Miss Beckwith can do under

water, of course a mathematician can do

<p 185>on dry land. Hence this is how it is

done.

If oil is poured on the water it checks

the sound-waves and puts you out.

_Question_ 2.--What would happen if

two sound-waves exactly alike were to

meet one another in the open air, moving

in opposite directions?

_Answer_.--If the sound-waves which

meet in the open air had not come from

the same source they would not recognise

each others existence, but if they had they

would embrace and mutually hold fast, in

other words, interfere with and destroy

each other.

_Question_ 9.--Describe any way in

which the velocity of light has been

measured.

_Answer_ (_a_).--A distinguished but

Heathen philosopher, Homer, was the first

to discover this. He was standing one day

at one side of the earth looking at Jupiter

when he conjectured that he would take

16 minutes to get to the other side.

This conjecture he then verified by careful

experiment. Now the whole way across

the earth is 3,072,000 miles, and dividing

<p 186>this by 16 we get the velocity 192,000

miles a second. This is so great that it

would take an express train 40 years to

do it, and the bullet from a canon over

5000 years.

P.S.--I think the gentlemans name was

Romer not Homer, but anyway he was

20% wrong and Mr. Fahrenheit and Mr.

Celsius afterwards made more careful

determinations.

(_b_) An Atheistic Scientist (falsely so

called) tried experiments on the Satellites

of Jupiter. He found that he could

delay the eclipse 16 minutes by going to

the other side of the earths orbit; in fact

he found he could make the eclipse

happen when he liked by simply shifting

his position. Finding that credit was

given him for determining the velocity

of light by this means he repeated it

so often that the calendar began to

get seriously wrong and there were

riots, and Pope Gregory had to set things

right.

_Question_ 10.--Explain why water pipes

burst in cold weather.

_Answer_.--People who have not studied

<p 187>Acoustics think that Thor bursts the pipes,

but we know that it is nothing of the kind

for Professor Tyndall has burst the

mythologies and has taught us that it is the

natural behaviour of water (and bismuth)

without which all fish would die and the

earth be held in an iron grip,

CHAPTER VIII.

FOREIGNERS' ENGLISH.

IT is not surprising that foreigners

should make mistakes when

writing in English, and Englishmen,

who know their own deficiencies in

this respect, are not likely to be

censorious when foreigners fall into these

blunders. But when information is printed

for the use of Englishmen, one would

think that the only wise plan was to have

the composition revised by one who is

thoroughly acquainted with the language.

That this natural precaution is not always

taken we have ample evidence. Thus, at

Havre, a polyglot announcement of certain

local regulations was posted in the harbour,

and the notice stood as follows in French:

``Un arrangement peut se faire avec le

pilote pour de promenades <a!> rames.'' The

following very strange translation into

<p 189>English appeared below the French:

``One arrangement can make himself

with the pilot for the walking with roars.''

The papers distributed at international

exhibitions are often very oddly worded.

Thus, an agent in the French court of

one of these, who described himself as

an ``Ancient Commercial Dealer,'' stated

on a handbill that ``being appointed by

Tenants of the Exhibition to sell Show

Cases, Frames, &c., which this Court

incloses, I have the honour to inform

Museum Collectors, Librarians, Builders,

Shopkeepers, and business persons in

general, that the fixed prices will hardly be

the real value of the Glasses which adorn

them.''

In 1864 was published in Paris a

pretentious work, consisting of notices of

the various literary and scientific societies

of the world, which positively swarms with

blunders in the portion devoted to England.

The new forms into which well-known

names are transmogrified must be seen to

be believed. Wadham College is printed

_Washam_, Warwick as _Worwick_; and one

of our metropolitan parks is said to be

<p 190>dedicated to a saint whose name does

not occur in any calendar, viz., _St. Jam's

Park_. There is the old confusion respecting

English titles which foreigners

find so difficult to understand; and

monsieur and esquire usually appear

respectively before and after the names of

the same persons. The Christian names

of knights and baronets are omitted, so

that we obtain such impossible forms as

``Sir Brown.''

The book is arranged geographically,

and in all cases the English word ``shire''

is omitted, with the result that we come

upon such an extremely curious monster

as ``le Comt<e'> de Shrop.''

On the very first page is made the

extraordinary blunder of turning the Cambrian

Arch<ae>ological Association into a _Cambridge_

Society; while the Parker Society,

whose publications were printed at the

University Press, is entered under

_Canterbury_. It is possible that the Latin name

_Cantabrigia_ has originated this mistake.

The Roxburgh Society, although its

foundation after the sale of the magnificent

library of the Duke of Roxburgh is cor<p 191>rectly

described, is here placed under the

county of Roxburgh. The most amusing

blunder, however, in the whole book is

contained in the following charmingly

na<i:>ve piece of etymology _<a!> propos_ of the

Geological and Polytechnic Society of the

West Riding of Yorkshire: ``On sait qu'en

Anglais le mot _Ride_ se traduit par

voyage <a!> cheval ou en voiture; on pourrait

peut-<e^>tre penser, d<e!>s le d<e'>but, qu'il s'agit

d'une Soci<e'>t<e'> hippique. II n'en est rien;

<a!> l'exemple de l'Association Britannique,

dont elle,'' etc. This pairs off well with

the translation of _Walker, London_, given

on a previous page.

The Germans find the same difficulty

with English titles that the French do,

and confuse the Sir at the commencement

of our letters with Herr or Monsieur.

Thus, they frequently address Englishmen

as _Sir_, instead of mister or esquire. We

have an instance of this in a publication

of no less a learned body than the Royal

Academy of Sciences of Munich, who

issued in 1860 a ``Rede auf Sir Thomas

Babington Macaulay.''

An hotel-keeper at Bale translated

<p 192>``limonade gazeuse'' as ``gauze lemonads";

and the following delightful entry

is from the Travellers' Book of the Drei

Mohren Hotel at Augsburg, under date

Jan. 28th, 1815: ``His Grace Arthur

Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, &c., &c.,

&c. Great honour arrived at the beginning

of this year to the three Moors. This

illustrious warrior, whose glorious

atchievements which cradled in Asia have filled

Europe with his renown, descended in it.''

It may be thought that, as this is not

printed, but only written, it is scarcely fair

to preserve it here; but it really is too

good to leave out.

The keepers of hotels are great sinners

in respect to the manner in which they

murder the English language. The following

are a few samples of this form of

literature, and most readers will recall

others that they have come across in their

travels.

The first is from Salzburg:--

``George Nelb<o:>ck begs leave to recommand

his hotel to the Three Allied, situated

_vis-<a!>-vis_ of the birth house of Mozart, which

offers all comforts to the meanest charges.

<p 193>

The next notice comes from Rastadt:--

``ADVICE OF AN HOTEL.

``The underwritten has the honour of

informing the publick that he has made

the acquisition of the hotel to the Savage,

well situated in the middle of this city.

He shall endeavour to do all duties which

gentlemen travellers can justly expect;

and invites them to please to convince

themselves of it by their kind lodgings at

his house.

``BASIL

``JA. SINGESEM.

``Before the tenant of the Hotel to

the Stork in this city.''

Whatever may be the ambition of mine

host at Pompeii, it can scarcely be the

fame of an English scholar:--

``Restorative Hotel Fine Hok,

Kept by Frank Prosperi,

Facing the military quarter

at Pompei.

That hotel open since a very few days is

renowned for the cheapness of the Apart<p 194>ments

and linen, for the exactness of the

service, and for the excellence of the true

French cookery. Being situated at proximity

of that regeneration, it will be propitious

to receive families, whatever, which

will desire to reside alternatively into that

town to visit the monuments now found

and to breathe thither the salubrity of the

air. That establishment will avoid to all

travellers, visitors of that sepult city and

to the artists (willing draw the antiquities)

a great disorder occasioned by tardy and

expensive contour of the iron whay people

will find equally thither a complete sortment

of stranger wines and of the kingdom,

hot and cold baths, stables, coach houses,

the whole at very moderated prices. Now

all the applications and endeavours of the

Hoste will tend always to correspond to

the tastes and desires of their customers

which will require without doubt to him

into that town the reputation whome, he

is ambitious.''

On the occasion of the Universal

Exhibition of Barcelona in 1888 the _Moniteur

de l'Exposition_ printed a description of

Barcelona in French, German, Spanish,

<p 195>and English. The latter is so good that

it is worthy of being printed in full:--

``Then there will be in the same Barcelona

the first universal Exposition of

Spain. It was not possible to choose a

more favorable place, for the capital-

town of Catalonia is a first-rate city open

to civilization.

``It is quite out of possibility to deny it

to be the industrial and commercial capital

of the peninsula and a universal Exposition

could not possibly meet in any other

place a more lively splendour than in this

magnificent town.

``Indeed what may want Barcelona to

deserve to be called great and handsome?

Are here not to be found archeological

and architectural riches, whose specimens

are inexhaustible?

``What are then those churches whose

style it is impossible to find elsewhere,

containing altars embellished with truly

spanish magnificence, and so large and

imposing cloisters, that there feels any

man himself exceedingly small and little?

What those shaded promenades, where

the sun cannot almost get through with

<p 196>the golden tinge of its rays? what this

Rambla where every good citizen of

Barcelona must take his walk at least

once every day, in order to accomplish the

civic pilgrimage of a true Catalanian?

``And that Paseo Colon, so picturesque

with its palmtrees and electric light,

which makes it like, in the evening, a

theatrical decoration, and whose ornament

has been very happily just finished?

``And that statue of Christopher

Colomb, whose installation will be

accomplished in a very short time, whose price

may be 500,000 francs?

``Are not there still a number of proud

buildings, richly ornamented, and splendid

theaters? one of them, perhaps the

most beautiful, surely the largest (it

contains 5000 places) the Liceo, is truly

a master-pi<e!>ce, where the spectators are

lost in admiration of the riches, the

ornaments, the pictures and feel a true

regret to turn their eyes from them to

look at the stage.

``You will see coffee houses, where have

been spent hundreds of thousands to

change their large rooms in enchanted

<p 197>halls with which it would be difficult to

contest even for the palaces of east.

``And still in those little streets, now

very few, so narrow that the inhabitants

of their opposite houses can shake hands

together, do you not know that doors

may be found which open to yards and

staircases worthy of palaces?

``Do you not know there are plenty of

sculptures, every one of them masterpieces,

and that, especially the town

and deputation house contain some halls

which would make meditate all our great

masters?

``If we walk through the Catalonia-

square to reach the Ensanche, our

astonishment becomes still greater.

``In this Ensanche, a newly-born, but

already a great town, there are no streets:

there are but promenades with trees on

both sides, which not only moderate the

rays of the sun through their follage, but

purify the surrounding atmosphere and

seem to say to those who are walking

beneath their shade: You are breathing

here the purest air!

``There display the houses plenty of

<p 198>the rarest sorts of marble. Out and

indoors rules marble, the ceilings of the

halls, the staircases, the yards command

and force admiration to the spectator,

who thought to see only houses and finds

monumental buildings.

``Join to that a Paseo de Gracia with

immense perspective; the promenade of

Cortes, 10 kil. long; some free squares

by day- and night-time, in which the rarest

plants and the sweetest flowers enchant

the passengers eyes and enbalm his

smell.

``Join lastly the neighbourhoods, but a

short way from the town and put on all

sides in communication with it by means

of tramways-lines and steam-tramways

too; those places show a very charming

scenery for every one who likes natural

beauties mingled with those which are

created by the genius of man.

``After that all there is Monjuich, whose

proud fortress seems to say: I protect

Barcelona: half-way the slope of the

mountain, there are Miramar, Vista

Alegre, which afford one of the grandest

panorama in the world: on the left side,

<p 199>the horizon skirting, some hills which

form a girdle, whose indented tops detach

them selves from an ever-blue sky; at

the foot of those mountains, the suburbs

we have already mentioned, created for

the rest and enjoyment of man after his

accomplished duty and finished work;

on the lowest skirt Barcelona in a flame

with its great buildings, steeples, towers,

houses ornamented with flat terraces, and

more than all that, its haven, which had

been, to say so, conquered over the

Mediterranean and harbors daily in itself

a large number of ships.

``All this ideal Whole is concentrated

beneath an enchanting sky, almost as

beautiful as the sky of Italy. The climate

of Barcelona is very much like Nice, the

pretty.

``Winter is here unknown; in its place

there rules a spring, which allows every

plant to bud, every most delicate flower

to blossom, orangetrees and roses, throughout

the whole year.

``In one word, Barcelona is a magnificent

town, which is about to offer to the

world a splendid, universal Exposition,

<p 200>whose success is quite out of doubt

determined.''

At the Paris Exhibition of 1889 a

_Practical Guide_ was produced for the

benefit of the English visitor, which is

written throughout in the most astonishing

jargon, as may be seen from the

opening sentences of the ``Note of the

Editor,'' which run as follows: ``The

Universal Exhibition, for whom who comes

there for the first time, is a true chaos

in which it is impossible to direct and

recognize one's self without a guide.

What wants the stranger, the visitor who

comes to the Exhibition, it is a means

which permits him to see all without

losing uselessly his time in the most part

vain researches.''

This is the account of the first

conception of the Exhibition: ``Who was

giving the idea of the Exhibition? The

first idea of an Exhibition of the

Centenary belongs in reality not to anybody.

It was in the air since several years, when

divers newspapers, in 1883, bethought

them to consecrate several articles to it,

and so it became a serious matter. The

<p 201>period of incubation (brooding) lasted

since 1883 till the month of March 1884;

when they considered the question they

preoccupied them but about a National

Exhibition. Afterwards the ambition

increased. The ministery, then presided

by Mr. Jules Ferry, thought that if they

would give to this commercial and industrial

manifestation an international character

they would impose the peace not

only to France, but to the whole world.''

The Eiffel Tower gives occasion for

some particularly fine writing: ``In order

to attire the stranger, to create a great

attraction which assured the success of

the Exhibition, it wanted something

exceptional, unrivalled, extraordinary. An

engineer presented him, Mr. Eiffel, already

known by his considerable and keen

works. He proposed to M. Locroy to

erect a tower in iron which, reaching the

height of three hundred metres, would

represent, at the industrial sight, the

resultant of the modern progresses. M.

Locroy reflected and accepted. Hardly

twenty years ago, this project would have

appeared fantastic and impossible. The

<p 202>state of the science of the iron

constructions was not advanced enough, the

security given by the calculations was not

yet assured; to-day, they know where

they are going, they are able to count the

force of the wind. The resistance which

the iron opposes to it. Mr. Eiffel came

at the proper time, and nevertheless how

many people have prophetized that the

tower would never been constructed.

How many critics have fallen upon this

audacious project! It was erected,

however, and one perceives it from all Paris;

it astonishes and lets in extasy the

strangers who come to contemplate it.''

The figures attached to the fountain

under the tower are comically described

as follows:--

``Europe under the lines of a woman,

leaned upon a printing press to print and

a book, seems deeped in reflections.

``America is young woman, energetic and

virginal however, characterising the youth

and the audacies of the American people.

``Asia, the cradle of the human kind,

represents the volupty and the sensualism.

Her posture, the expression of her figure,

<p 203>render well the abandonment of the passion

with the oriental people.

``Africa represented by a figure of a

woman in a timid attitude, is well the

symbol of the savage people enslaved by

the civilisation.

``Australia finally is figured by a woman

buttressed on herself, like an animal not

yet tamed, ready to throw itself on its

prey, without waiting to be attacked. . . .

``Above Asia and Africa, the Love and

the Sleep, in the shade of a floating

drapery. Finally, between Europe and

America, a young girl symbolises the

History.''

The author commences the account

of his first walk as follows: ``Thus we

begin, at present as we have let him see

these two wonderworks which fly at the

eyes, the Tower and the fountain, to return

on his steps to retake with order this walk

of recognition which will permit him,

thanks to our watchfulness, to see all in

a short time.''

``The History of the human dwelling''

is introduced thus: ``It is the moment

or never to walk among the surprising

<p 204>restitution, of which M. Garnier the

eminent architect of the Opera has made

him the promoter. On our left going

along the flower-beds from the Tower till

here, the constructions of the History of

the human Dwelling is unfolded to our

eyes. The human Dwelling in all countries

and in all times, there is certainly

an excellent subject of study. Without

doubt the great works do not fail, where

conscientious plates enable us to know

exactly in which condition where living

our ancestors, how their dwellings where

disposed in the interior. But nothing

approaches the demonstration by the

materiality of the fact, and it is struck

with this truth that the organisators of

the Exhibition resolved to erect an

improvisated town, including houses of all

countries and all latitudes.''

The author finishes up his little work

in the same self-satisfied manner, which

shows how unconscious he was that he

was writing rubbish:--

``There is finished our common walk,

and in a happy way, after six days which

we dare believe it did not seem to you

<p 205>long, and tiresome, your curiosity finding

a constant aliment at every step which we

made you do, in this exhibition without

rivalry, where the beauties succeed to

the beauties, where one leaves not one

pleasure but for a new one. As for us,

our task of cicerone is too agreeable

to us, that we shall do our best to

retain you still near us, in efforcing us

to discover still other spectacles, and to

present you them after all those you

know already.''

If it be absurd to give information to

Englishmen in a queer jargon which it is

difficult for him to understand, what must

be said of those who attempt to teach a

language of which they are profoundly

ignorant? Most of us can call to mind

instances of exceedingly unidiomatic

sentences which have been presented to

our notice in foreign conversation books;

but certainly the most extraordinary of

this class of blunders are to be found in

the _New Guide of the Conversation in

Portuguese and English_, by J. de Fonseca

and P. Carolino, which created some

stir in the English press a few years

<p 206>ago.[14] The authors do not appear to

have had even the most distant acquaintance

with either the spoken or written

language, so that many of the sentences

are positively unintelligible, although

the origin of many of them may be

found in a literal translation of certain

French sentences. One chapter of this

wonderful book is devoted to _Idiotisms_,

which is a singularly appropriate title

for such odd English proverbs as the

following:--

[14] A selection from this book was printed by

Messrs. Field & Tuer under the title of _English

as she is spoke_.

``The necessity don't know the low.''

``To build castles in Espaguish.''

``So many go the jar to spring, than at

last rest there.''

(A little further on we find another

version of this well-known proverb: ``So

much go the jar to spring that at last it

break there.'')

``The stone as roll not heap up not

foam.''

``He is beggar as a church rat.''

``To come back at their muttons.''

<p 207>

``Tell me whom thou frequent, I will

tell you which you are.''

The apparently incomprehensible sentence

``He sin in trouble water'' is explained

by the fact that the translator

confused the two French words _p<e'>cher_,

to sin, and _p<e^>cher_, to fish.

The classification adopted by the

authors cannot be considered as very

scientific. The only colours catalogued

are _white, cray, gridelin, musk_ and _red_;

the only ``music's instruments''--_a

flagelet, a dreum_, and a _hurdy-gurdy_.

``Common stones'' appear to be _loadstones,

brick, white lead_, and _gumstone_.

But probably the list of ``Chastisements''

is one of the funniest things in this Guide

to Conversation. The list contains _a fine,

honourable fine, to break upon, to tear off

the flesh, to draw to four horses_.

The anecdotes chosen for the instruction

of the unfortunate Portuguese youth are

almost more unintelligible than the rest

of the book, and probably the following

two anecdotes could not be matched in

any other printed book:--

``The Commander Forbin of Janson,

<p 208>being at a repast with a celebrated

Boileau, had undertaken to pun upon

her name:--`What name, told him, carry

you thither? Boileau: I would wish

better to call me Drink wine.' The poet

was answered him in the same tune:--

`And you, sir, what name have you choice?

Janson: I should prefer to be named

John-meal. The meal don't is valuable

better than the furfur.'''

The next is as good:--

``Plato walking one's self a day to the

field with some of their friends. They

were to see him Diogenes who was in

water untill the chin. The superficies

of the water was snowed, for the rescue

of the hole that Diogenes was made.

Don't look it more told them Plato, and

he shall get out soon.''

A large volume entitled _Polugl<o^>ssos_ was

published in Belgium in 1841, which is

even more misleading and unintelligible

than the Portuguese School Book. The

English vocabulary contains some amazing

words, such as _agridulce, ales of troops,

ancientness sign, bivacq fire, breast's pellicule,

chimney black money, infatuated compass,

<p 209>iug_ (vocal), _window, umbrella_, etc. At

the end of this vocabulary are these

notes:--

``Look the abridged introduction

exeptless for the english editions, foregoing

the french postcript, next after the title

page. Just as the numbers, the names

of cities, states, seas, mountains and

rivers, the christian names of men and

woman, and several synonimous, who

enter into the composition of many

english words, suppressed in the former

vocabulary, are explained by the respective

categorys and appointed at the general

index, look also by these, what is not

found here above.''

``_Version alternative_. See for the shorter

introduction exeptless for the english

editions, foregoing the french postscript

next after the title page. Just as the

numbers &c. . . . their expletives are

be given by the respective categorys, and

appointed at the general index, to wich

is sent back!''

We are frequently told that foreigners

are much better educated than we are,

and that the trade of the world is slipping

<p 210>through our fingers because we are not

taught languages as the foreigners are.

This may be so, but one cannot help

believing that the dullest of English

clerks would be able to hold his own

in competition with the ingenious youths

who are taught foreign languages on the

system adopted by Senhors Fonseca

and Carolino, and by the compiler of

_Polugl<o^>ssos_.

Guides to a foreign town or country

written in English by a foreigner are

often very misleading; in fact, sometimes

quite incomprehensible. A contributor

to the _Notes and Queries_ sent to that

periodical some amusing extracts from a

Guide to Amsterdam. The following few

lines from a description of the Assize

Court give a fair idea of the language:--

``The forefront has a noble and sublime

aspect, and is particularly characteristical

to what it ought to represent. It

is built in a division of three fronts in

the corinthic order, each of them consists

of four raising columns, resting upon a

general basement from the one end of

the forefront to the other, and supporting

<p 211>a cornish, equalling running all over the

face.''[15]

[15] _Notes and Queries_, First Series, iii 347.

When it was known that Louis XVIII.

was to be restored to the throne of France,

a report was circulated that the Duke of

Clarence (afterwards William IV.) would

take the command of the vessel which was

to convey the king to Calais. The people

of that town were in a fever of expectation,

and having decided to sing _God save

the King_ in honour of their English visitor,

they thought that it would be an additional

compliment if they supplemented it with

an entirely new verse, which ran as

follows:--

``God save noble Clar<e'>nce,

Who brings our King to France,

God save Clar<e'>nce;

He maintains the glor<y'>

Of the British nav<y'>,

Oh God, make him happ<y'>,

God save Clar<e'>nce.''[16]

[16] _Ibid_., iv. 131.

In continuation of the story, it may be

said that the Duke did not go to Calais,

<p 212>and that therefore the anthem was not

sung.

The composer of this strange verse

succeeded in making pretty fair English,

even if his rhymes were somewhat deficient

in correctness. This was not the case

with a rather famous inscription made by

a Frenchman. Monsieur Girardin, who

inscribed a stone at Ermenonville in

memory of our once famous poet Shenstone,

was not stupid, but rather preternaturally

clever. This inscription is

above all praise for the remarkable manner

in which the rhymes appeal to the eye

instead of the ear; and moreover it shows

how world-famous was that charming

garden at Leasowes, near Halesowen,

which is now only remembered by the

few:--

``This plain stone

To William Shenstone.

In his writings he display's

A mind natural.

At Leasowes he laid

Arcadian greens rural.''

Dr. Moore, having on a certain occasion

excused himself to a Frenchman for using

<p 213>an expression which he feared was not

French, received the reply, ``Bon monsieur,

mais il m<e'>rite bien de l'<e^>tre.'' Of these

lines it is impossible to paraphrase this

polite answer, for we cannot say that they

deserve to be English.

INDEX.

Adder _for_ nadder, 7.

Afghan _for_ Anglican, 148.

Agassiz, _Zoological Biography_, blunder in, 64.

Alison's (Sir Archibald) blunder, 34.

Ampulle (Sainte), 35

Amsterdam, Guide to, 210.

Anderson (Andrew), his disgraceful printing of the Bible, 141.

Apostrophe, importance of an, 121.

Apron _for_ napron, 7.

_Arabian Nights_, translations of, 45.

Arden (Pepper), 60.

Arlington (Lord), his title taken from the village of Harlington, 8.

Artaxerxes, 54.

Ash's Dictionary, 9, 10.

Averrhoes, 54.

Babington's (Bishop) _Exposition of the Lord's Prayer_, 92.

_Bachaumont, M<e'>moires de_, 33.

Baly's (Dr.) translation of M<u:>ller's _Physiology_, 51.

<p 216>

Barcelona Exhibition (1883), 194

Barker (Robert) and Martin Lucas fined for

leaving _not_ out of the Seventh Commandment, 136.

Bellarmin, misprints in his works, 79.

Benserade's joke, 97.

Bible, blunders in the printing of the, 135.

----incorrect translations of passages in, 58.

----the ``Wicked'' Bible, 136.

_Bibliographical Blunders_ 63 - 77

Bismarck's (Prince) endeavours to keep on good

terms with all the Powers, 145.

Blades's (W.) _Shakspere and Typography_, 104.

Blunder, knowledge necessary to make a, 2.

Blunders, amusing mistakes, 1.

_Blunders in General_, 1-30.

----_of Authors_, 31 -46.

----_of Translators_, 47-62.

----(_Bibliographical_), 63-77.

----(_Schoolboys_'), 157-187.

Boehm's tract on the Boots of Isaiah, 71.

Boyle (Robert) becomes Le Boy, 72.

Brandenburg (Elector of) and Father Wolff, 20.

Brathwaite's (R.) _Strappado for the Divell_, 94.

Breton's (Nicholas) tracts, 81.

----_Wit of Wit_, 93.

_Bride (La) de Lammermuir_, 49.

Brigham le jeune _for_ Brigham Young, 67.

Britton's _Tunbridge Wells_, 37.

Broch (J. K.), an imaginary author, 64.

Buckingham's (J. Silk) anecdote of a wilful

misprint, 140.

<p 217>

Bulls, a sub-class of blunders, 24.

----made by others than Irishmen, 25.

----(Negro), 26.

Burton (Hill) on bulls, 29.

Butler's (S.) allusion to corrupted texts, 135.

----misprints in his lines, 127.

Byron's _Childe Harold_, persistent misprint in, 134.

C<ae>soris (Mr. C. J.), 73.

Calamities _for_ Calamites, 116

Calpensis (Flora) not an authoress, 68.

Campbell's (Lord) supposed criticism of _Romeo and Juliet_, 46.

_Campion, Death and Martyrdom of_, 81.

Camus, an imaginary author, 65.

Canons _for_ chanoines, 48.

Capo Basso, 48.

Cardan's treatise _De Subtilitate_ without a misprint, 97

Careme, _Le Patissier Pittoresque_, 74.

Cartwright (Major), 60.

Castlemaine's (Lord) _English Globe_, 87.

Chaucer's works, misprints in, 153.

Chelsea porcelain, 43.

Chernac's _Mathematical Tables_, 144.

Cicero's (Mr. Tul.) _Epistles_, 72.

----_Offices_, 51.

Cinderella and the glass slipper, 57.

Classification, blunders in, 73.

Clement XIV. (Pope), 26.

Clerk (P. K.) _for_ Rev. Patrick Keith, 69.

Cockeram's _English Dictionarie_, 11.

<p 218>

Collier (John Payne), blunder made in a

newspaper account of his burial, 127.

Contractions, ignorant misreading of, 124.

Coquilles, specimens of, 147.

Correspondence, etymology of, 9.

Cow cut into _calves_, 129.

Cowley's allusion to corrupted texts, 135,

Cromwells, confusion of the two, 169.

Cross readings, 24.

Cruikshank's (George) real name supposed to be

Simon Pure, 70.

Curmudgeon, etymology of, 10.

_Damn<e'> et Calive_, 49.

Darius, 54

Dekker's _Satiro-Mastix_, errata to, 80.

Deleted _for_ delited in Shakespeare, 115.

De Morgan, on authors correcting their own

proofs, 89.

D'Israeli's _Curiosities of Literature_, 68, 69.

Do part _for_ depart, 8.

Donis (Nicholas), an imaginary author, 66.

Dorus Basilicus, an imaginary author, 65.

Dotet in trouble, 55.

Drayton, misreading of, 6.

Edgeworth's _Essay on Irish Bulls_, 28.

Emendations of editors, 23.

_English as she is Spoke_, 206.

_English as she is Taught_, 160.

Enrichi de Deux Listes (Mons.), 68.

Erekmann-Chatrian's _Conscript_, 56.

<p 219>

_Errata (lists of_), 78-99.

Estienne's (Henri) joke over a misprint, 152.

Etymologies (absurd), 9.

Ewing's (Bishop) _Argyllshire Seaweeds_, 74.

Examined, blunders of the, 157.

Faith, definition of, 158

Faraday (_Sir_ Michael), 41.

Featley's (Dr. Daniel) _Romish Fisher Caught in

his own Net_, 96.

Field the printer's blunders, 139.

_Finis Coronat opus_, 61.

Fitzgerald (Fighting), 32.

Fletcher's _The Nice Valour_, 96.

Fonseca and Carolino, _Guide of the Conversation_, 205.

_Foreigners' English_, 188-213.

Foulis's edition of Horace, 98.

French kings, anointing of the, 35.

Galt's _Lives of the Players_, 45

Garnett's _Florilegium Amantis_, 75.

Gascoigne's (George) _Droomme of Doomes Day_, 91.

Ghost words, 2.

Girardin's epitaph on Shenstone at Ermenonville, 212.

Gladstone's (Mr.) _Gleanings of Past Years_, 38.

Glanvill's (Joseph) _Essays_, 86.

``God save the King,'' new verse by a Frenchman, 211.

Goldsmith's blunders, 31,

<p 220>

Goldsmith's _Deserted Village_, translation of a line in, 56.

Gordon (J. E. H.) and B. A. Cantab, 69.

Greatrakes (Valentine), blunder in his name, 118.

Greeley's (Horace) bad writing, 126.

Grolier not a binder, 19.

Haggard 's (Rider) _King Solomon's Mines_, 74.

Hales's (Prof.) observations on misprints, 131.

Hall's (John) _Hor<ae> Vaciv<ae>_, 117.

Halliwell-Phillipps' _Dictionary of Misprints_, 80, 101.

Harrison's (Peter) bull, 29.

Henri II. not a potter, 19.

Herodote et aussi Jazon, 49.

Heywood's (Thomas) _Apology for Actors_, 83.

Hirudo _for_ hirundo, 48.

_Hit or Miss_, 53.

Holy Gruel _for_ Holy Grail, 149.

Homeric poems, author of the, 158.

Hood's lines on misprints, 151.

Hood (Thomas), _Geometricall Instrument called a Sector_, 82.

Hook's (Dean) bad writing, 123.

Hooker's _Ecclesiastical Polity_, corrections by the author, 93.

Hopton's (Arthur) _Baculum Geod<oe>ticum Viaticum_, 83.

Horse-shoeing husbandry _for_ horse hoeing, 149.

Hotel-keepers' English, 192.

Howell's (J.) _Deudrologia_, 75.

Huet, ``ancient'' Bishop of Avranch, 51.

<p 221>

Hugo's (Victor) translation, 50.

Hunt's (Leigh) specimens of misprints, 148.

Hyett s{sic} _Flowers from the South_, 74.

Ibn Roshd = Averrhoes, 54

Immoral _for_ immortal, 120.

_Independent Whig_, 53.

``Indifferent justice,'' 42.

Insurrection _for_ resurrection, 133.

Jefferies (Judge) said to have presided at the trial

of Charles I., 37.

Job's wish that his adversary had written a book, 58.

Jonson's (Ben) _Every Man in his Humour_, 95.

Juvenal, edition of, with the first printed errata, 78.

Lamartine's _Girondins_, translation of, 54.

Lamb's _Tales from Shakespeare_, 45.

Lane's (E. W.) good writing, 123.

La Rochefoucauld _as_ Ruchfucove, 53.

Layamon's Brat _for_ Brut, 149.

Le Berceau, an imaginary author, 67

Leigh's (Edward) table of errata, 79.

Leviticus supposed to be a man, 17.

Leycester's (Sir Peter) _Historical Antiquities_, 97.

Littleton's Latin Dictionary, 10.

Lodge's (Prof. Oliver) series of examination papers 174

Logotypes, 113.

<p 222>

London (William) not a bishop, 67.

Louis XIV., blunder of, 171.

----_Secret Memoirs of the Court of_, blunder in 55

_Louis XVIII., M<e'>moires de_, blundes in, 33.

_Love's Last Shift_, 52.

Macaulay's blunder as to the _Faerie Queene_, 39.

----opinion of Goldsmith's blunders, 31.

Malherbe's epitaph on Rosette, 145.

Mantissa, an imaginary author, 67.

Marmontel's _Moral Tales_, 51.

Maroni's (P. V.) _The Opera_, 73.

Marriage Service, misprint in, 8.

Marvell's _Rehearsal Transprosed_, 122.

_Men of the Time_, misFrint in, 155.

M<e'>nage on bad writirlg, 122.

Mephistopheles, 151.

Milton said to have written the _Inferno_, 42

_Misprints_, 100-156.

----(intentional), 155.

Mispronunciations, 22.

Misquotations, 21.

_Miss<ae> ac Misselis Anatomia_, 1561, book with

fifteen pages of errata, 79.

_Mistakes, A New Booke of_, 1637, 24.

Monosyllabic titles, 40.

Morgan's (Silvanus) _Horologiographia Optica_, 85.

Morton's _Natural History of Northamptonshire_, 89.

_Mourning Bride_, 52.

Murray's (Dr.) ghost words, 6.

<p 223>

Murrell's _Cookery_, 1632, 112.

Musical Examinations, blunders in, 164

Napier's bones, 38.

Napoleon III. said to be Consul in 1853, 35

Nash's _Lenten Stuffe_, 93.

Nicholson (Dr. Brinsley) on authors correcting

their own proofs, go, 95.

Nicolai a man not a place, 65.

Nova Scotia _for_ New Caledonia, 51.

Oxford Music Hall supposed to be at Oxford, 17.

Paine (Tom) confused with Thomas Payne, 67.

Paris Exhibition 1889, English guide to, 200.

Passagio (G.) not an author, 68.

Peacham's (Henry) _The Mastive_, 95.

Pickle (Sir Peregrine), 34.

Picus of Mirandula, edition of his works has the

longest list of errata on record, 78.

Playford's John) _Vade Mecum_, 87.

Poluglossos, 208.

Pope's lines, misprint in, 125.

Porcelain, etymology of, 9.

Porson's _Catechism of the Swinish Multitude_, 130.

Printers' upper and lower cases, 110, 111.

Proofs corrected by authors in the sixteenth and

seventeenth centuries, 89.

Prynne's _Brevia Parliamentaria_, 60.

Pythagoras as Peter Gower, {no page #}

Rabelais' blunder, 146.

<p 224>

Raleigh (Sir Walter), 171.

Ray's (John) _Remains_, 118.

Render, a bad translator; 47.

Richardson's (S.) etymology of correspondence, 9

Ridings of Yorkshire, 7, 191.

Robertson's _Scotland_, translation of, 49.

Robinson (Otis H.), on ``Titles of Books,'' 75.

Roche's (Sir Boyle) bull of the bird that was in

two places at once, 29.

Rogue Croix _for_ Rouge Croix, 130.

Ruskin's _Notes on Sheepfolds_, 73.

Saints (Imaginary), 13.

Sala's (Mr.) opinion on misprints, 128.

San Francisco, Florence, mistaken _for_ San

Francisco, California, 18.

Saroom (Jean), 66.

_Schoolboys' Blunders_, 157-187,

Scot's _Hop-Garden_, 90.

Scott (Sir Walter), ghost word. 5.

----his real name said to be William, 71.

Scylla and Charybdis, 43.

Shakespeare's text improved by attention to the

technicalities of printing, 105, 113.

Sharp's (William) misprint, 120.

Shelley's _Prometheus Unbound_, a copy in whole calf, 72.

Shenstone, epitaph on, by a Frenchman, 212.

Shirley's lines, misprints in, 125.

Sinclair's (Archdeacon) anecdote of an examination, 172.

<p 225>

Sixtus V. (Pope), misprints in his edition of the

Vulgate, 135.

Skeat's (Prof.) ghost words, 2.

----On misprints in Chaucer's works, 153.

Skimpole (Harold), 34.

Smith's (Sydney) ghost word, 4.

Souza's edition of Camoens, 98.

Stanyhurst's translation of Virgil (1582), 59, 91.

Stevens (Henry) on the ``Wicked'' Bible, 136.

Susannah called a maiden, 41.

Swinburne's _Under the Microscope_, 73.

Tellurium, supposed magnetic qualities of, 52.

``Thisms'' _for_ this MS., 119.

Tongs, strife of, 150.

Topography _for_ typography, 121.

Translations, humorous, 61.

Translators said to be traitors, 47

Tressan (Comte de), 47.

Trinity (Master of), 60.

Twain (Mark) on schoolboys' blunders, 160.

Unite _for_ untie, 149.

Ussher (Archbishop), 141.

Vagabond (Mr.) _for_ Mr. Rambler, 60.

Vedast (St.), _alias_ Foster, 13.

Venus _for_ Venns, 130.

Viar (S.), 16.

Vieta's _Canon Mathematicus_, 144.

Virtuous Rocks _for_ Vitreous Rocks, 150.

Viscontian snakes, 48.

<p 226>

Vitus (Saint), 16.

Wade's (Marshal) roads, 26.

_Walker, London_, 53.

Walpole's (Horace) specimen of a bull, 29.

W<a:>lsch _for_ Welsh, 51.

Warburton's (Bishop) blunder in quoting _Cinthio_ 34.

Watt's _Bibliotheca Britannica_, blunder in, 63.

Welsh rabbit, 52.

Wigorn (Bishop), 66.

William IV. when Duke of Clarence, 211.

Winton (George), 66.

Witt's (Richard) _Arithmetical Questions_, 90.

Words that never existed, 3.

Writing (bad) of authors, 122.

Xerxes, 54.

Xinoris (Saint), 13.

Ye _for_ the, 6.

Yonge's _Dynevor Terrace_, misprint in, 120.

_Yvery, History of the House of_, 19.

Zoile (Mons.) et Mdlle. Lycoris, 59.

Zollverein, 40.

End of Project Gutenberg's Literary Blunders, by Henry Benjamin Wheatley

Literary Blunders: A Chapter in the "History of Human Error" · 第 7 / 7 章