Here we come to another stage, another step forward. The instant society

becomes organized in clans, natural selection cannot let these clans be

broken up and die out,--the clan becomes the chief object or care of

natural selection, because if you destroy it you retrograde again, you

lose all you have gained; consequently, those clans in which the

primeval selfish instincts were so modified that the individual conduct

would be subordinated to some extent to the needs of the clan,--those

are the ones which would prevail in the struggle for life. In this way

you gradually get an external standard to which man has to conform his

conduct, and you get the germs of altruism and morality; and in the

prolonged affectionate relation between the mother and the infant you

get the opportunity for that development of altruistic feeling which,

once started in those relations, comes into play in the more general

relations, and makes more feasible and more workable the bonds which

keep society together, and enable it to unite on wider and wider terms.

So it seems that from a very small beginning we are reaching a very

considerable result. I had got these facts pretty clearly worked out,

and carried them around with me some years, before a fresh conclusion

came over me one day with a feeling of surprise. In the old days before

the Copernican astronomy was promulgated, man regarded himself as the

centre of the universe. He used to entertain theological systems which

conformed to his limited knowledge of nature. The universe seemed to be

made for his uses, the earth seemed to have been fitted up for his

dwelling place, he occupied the centre of creation, the sun was made to

give him light, etc. When Copernicus overthrew that view, the effect

upon theology was certainly tremendous. I do not believe that justice

has ever been done to the shock that it gave to man when he was made to

realize that he occupied a kind of miserable little clod of dirt in the

universe, and that there were so many other worlds greater than this. It

was one of the first great shocks involved in the change from ancient to

modern scientific views, and I do not doubt it was responsible for a

great deal of the pessimistic philosophizing that came in the

seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Now, it flashed upon me a dozen years or so ago--after thinking about

this manner in which man originated--that man occupies certainly just

as exceptional a position as before, if he is the terminal in a long

series of evolutionary events. If at the end of the long history of

evolution comes man, if this whole secular process has been going on to

produce this supreme object, it does not much matter what kind of a

cosmical body he lives on. He is put back into the old position of

theological importance, and in a much more intelligent way than in the

old days when he was supposed to occupy the centre of the universe. We

are enabled to say that while there is no doubt of the evolutionary

process going on throughout countless ages which we know nothing about,

yet in the one case where it is brought home to us we spell out an

intelligible story, and we do find things working along up to man as a

terminal fact in the whole process. This is indeed a consistent

conclusion from Wallace's suggestion that natural selection, in working

toward the genesis of man, began to follow a new path and make psychical

changes instead of physical changes. Obviously, here you are started

upon a new chapter in the history of the universe. It is no longer going

to be necessary to shape new limbs, and to thicken the skin and make new

growths of hair, when man has learned how to build a fire, when he can

take some other animal's hide and make it into clothes. You have got to

a new state of things.

After I had put together all these additional circumstances with regard

to the origination of human society and the development of altruism, I

began to see a little further into the matter. It then began to appear

that not only is man the terminal factor in a long process of evolution,

but in the origination of man there began the development of the higher

psychical attributes, and those attributes are coming to play a greater

and greater part in the development of the human race. Just take this

mere matter of "altruism," as we call it. It is not a pretty word, but

must serve for want of a better. In the development of altruism from the

low point, where there was scarcely enough to hold the clan together, up

to the point reached at the present day, there has been a notable

progress, but there is still room for an enormous amount of improvement.

The progress has been all in the direction of bringing out what we call

the higher spiritual attributes. The feeling was now more strongly

impressed upon me than ever, that all these things tended to set the

whole doctrine of evolution into harmony with religion; that if the past

through which man had originated was such as has been described, then

religion was a fit and worthy occupation for man, and some of the

assumptions which underlie every system of religion must be true. For

example, with regard to the assumption that what we see of the present

life is not the whole thing; that there is a spiritual side of the

question beside the material side; that, in short, there is for man a

life eternal. When I wrote the "Destiny of Man," all that I ventured to

say was, that it did not seem quite compatible with ordinary common

sense to suppose that so much pains would have been taken to produce a

merely ephemeral result. But since then another argument has occurred to

me: that just at the time when the human race was beginning to come upon

the scene, when the germs of morality were coming in with the family,

when society was taking its first start, there came into the human

mind--how one can hardly say, but there did come--the beginnings of a

groping after something that lies outside and beyond the world of sense.

That groping after a spiritual world has been going on here for much

more than a hundred thousand years, and it has played an enormous part

in the history of mankind, in the whole development of human society.

Nobody can imagine what mankind would have been without it up to the

present time. Either all religion has been a reaching out for a phantom

that does not exist, or a reaching out after something that does exist,

but of which man, with his limited intelligence, has only been able to

gain a crude idea. And the latter seems a far more probable conclusion,

because, if it is not so, it constitutes a unique exception to all the

operations of evolution we know about. As a general thing in the whole

history of evolution, when you see any internal adjustment reaching out

toward something, it is in order to adapt itself to something that

really exists; and if the religious cravings of man constitute an

exception, they are the one thing in the whole process of evolution that

is exceptional and different from all the rest. And this is surely an

argument of stupendous and resistless weight.

I take this autobiographical way of referring to these things, in the

order in which they came before my mind, for the sake of illustration.

The net result of the whole is to put evolution in harmony with

religious thought,--not necessarily in harmony with particular religious

dogmas or theories, but in harmony with the great religious drift, so

that the antagonism which used to appear to exist between religion and

science is likely to disappear. So I think it will before a great while.

If you take the case of some evolutionist like Professor Haeckel, who is

perfectly sure that materialism accounts for everything (he has got it

all cut and dried and settled; he knows all about it, so that there is

really no need of discussing the subject!); if you ask the question

whether it was his scientific study of evolution that really led him to

such a dogmatic conclusion, or whether it was that he started from some

purely arbitrary assumption, like the French materialists of the

eighteenth century, I have no doubt the latter would be the true

explanation. There are a good many people who start on their theories of

evolution with these ultimate questions all settled to begin with. It

was the most natural thing in the world that after the first assaults of

science upon old beliefs, after a certain number of Bible stories and a

certain number of church doctrines had been discredited, there should be

a school of men who in sheer weariness should settle down to scientific

researches, and say, "We content ourselves with what we can prove by the

methods of physical science, and we will throw everything else

overboard." That was very much the state of mind of the famous French

atheists of the last century. But only think how chaotic nature was to

their minds compared to what she is to our minds to-day. Just think how

we have in the present century arrived where we can see the bearings of

one set of facts in nature as collated with another set of facts, and

contrast it with the view which even the greatest of those scientific

French materialists could take. Consider how fragmentary and how lacking

in arrangement was the universe they saw compared with the universe we

can see to-day, and it is not strange that to them it could be an

atheistic world. That hostility between science and religion continued

as long as religion was linked hand in hand with the ancient doctrine of

special creation. But now that the religious world has unmoored itself,

now that it is beginning to see the truth and beauty of natural science

and to look with friendship upon conceptions of evolution, I suspect

that this temporary antagonism, which we have fallen into a careless way

of regarding as an everlasting antagonism, will come to an end perhaps

quicker than we realize.

There is one point that is of great interest in this connection,

although I can only hint at it. Among the things that happened in that

dim past when man was coming into existence was the increase of his

powers of manipulation; and that was a factor of immense importance.

Anaxagoras, it is said, wrote a treatise in which he maintained that the

human race would never have become human if it had not been for the

hand. I do not know that there was so very much exaggeration about

that. It was certainly of great significance that the particular race of

mammals whose intelligence increased far enough to make it worth while

for natural selection to work upon intelligence alone was the race which

had developed hands and could manipulate things. It was a wonderful era

in the history of creation when that creature could take a club and use

it for a hammer, or could pry up a stone with a stake, thus adding one

more lever to the levers that made up his arm. From that day to this,

the career of man has been that of a person who has operated upon his

environment in a different way from any animal before him. An era of

similar importance came probably somewhat later, when man learned how to

build a fire and cook his food; thus initiating that course of culinary

development of which we have seen the climax in our dainty dinner this

evening. Here was another means of acting upon the environment. Here was

the beginning of the working of endless physical and chemical changes

through the application of heat, just as the first use of the club or

the crowbar was the beginning of an enormous development in the

mechanical arts.

Now, at the same time, to go back once more into that dim past, when

ethics and religion, manual art and scientific thought, found

expression in the crudest form of myths, the æsthetic sense was

germinating likewise. Away back in the glacial period you find pictures

drawn and scratched upon the reindeer's antler, portraitures of mammoths

and primitive pictures of the chase; you see the trinkets, the personal

decorations, proving beyond question that the æsthetic sense was there.

There has been an immense æsthetic development since then. And I believe

that in the future it is going to mean far more to us than we have yet

begun to realize. I refer to the kind of training that comes to mankind

through direct operation upon his environment, the incarnation of his

thought, the putting of his ideas into new material relations. This is

going to exert powerful effects of a civilizing kind. There is something

strongly educational and disciplinary in the mere dealing with matter,

whether it be in the manual training school, whether it be in carpentry,

in overcoming the inherent and total depravity of inanimate things,

shaping them to your will, and also in learning to subject yourself to

their will (for sometimes you must do that in order to achieve your

conquests; in other words, you must humour their habits and

proclivities). In all this there is a priceless discipline, moral as

well as mental, let alone the fact that, in whatever kind of artistic

work a man does, he is doing that which in the very working has in it an

element of something outside of egoism; even if he is doing it for

motives not very altruistic, he is working toward a result the end of

which is the gratification or the benefit of other persons than himself;

he is working toward some result which in a measure depends upon their

approval, and to that extent tends to bring him into closer relations to

his fellow man.

In the future, to an even greater extent than in the recent past, crude

labour will be replaced by mechanical contrivances. The kind of labour

which can command its price is the kind which has trained intelligence

behind it. One of the great needs of our time is the multiplication of

skilled and special labour. The demand for the products of intelligence

is far greater than that for mere crude products of labour, and it will

be more and more so. For there comes a time when the latter products

have satisfied the limit to which a man can consume food and drink and

shelter,--those things which merely keep the animal alive. But to those

things which minister to the requirements of the spiritual side of a man

there is almost no limit. The demand one can conceive is well-nigh

infinite. One of the philosophical things that have been said, in

discriminating man from the lower animals, is that he is the one

creature who is never satisfied. It is well for him that he is so, that

there is always something more for which he craves. To my mind, this

fact most strongly hints that man is infinitely more than a mere animate

machine.

_May, 1895._

V

THE ORIGINS OF LIBERAL THOUGHT IN AMERICA[17]

In approaching the subject of the origins of liberal thought in America,

one cannot help remembering that the discovery of the new continent was

itself such a stimulus to free thinking as the world had never before

witnessed. From time immemorial, the trade between Europe and the remote

parts of Asia had followed certain customary routes. From ancient days,

long before Olympiads were heard of, when Assyrian kings with curly

beards commemorated their victories in arrow-headed inscriptions, men

had used those same routes. Up the Red Sea, in the early prime of

hundred-gated Thebes, came ships from the Indian Ocean, with gems and

spices to exchange for Egyptian fine linens and amulets of amber from

the Baltic; and five thousand years later Venetian argosies at

Alexandria were laden with just such gems and spices to distribute to

the merchants of Augsburg, the royal household at Paris, the lords and

ladies of Haddon Hall. Empires rose and fell, creeds and pantheons came

and went, stately temples reared their heads for centuries and slowly

crumbled in ruins, and still amid all the secular change the world's

great stream of trade flowed through the same unshifting channels, and

there was nothing to show that this state of things, to which men's

ideas and habits had always been adjusted, was not to endure forever. So

it was in that recent time when Henry V. of England was smiting the

French chivalry at Agincourt, and his cousin Prince Henry of Portugal

was beginning the search for an ocean route to the Indies. Never did the

human mind get such a wrench out of its ancient grooves, never were such

vistas of new possibilities laid open, never was beheld such glorious

hardihood, such startling romance, as in the time when Columbus sailed

westward to find the East, and Cortes met warriors of the Stone Age face

to face. The men of Europe suddenly found themselves placed in new and

unsuspected relations to the planet on which they lived; worlds of

barbarism and savagery, unheard of and unspeakably bizarre, were brought

to their notice; strange constellations arose in the firmament; strange

beasts and birds were encountered amid outlandish trees and shrubs in

new climates beyond unknown seas. The old familiarity with nature's

aspects received an abrupt shock. On every side loomed up new questions

to be answered, new practical problems to be solved. All man's inventive

faculty, all his patient inquisitiveness, all the courage he could

summon, were forthwith called into play. The dreams of boundless riches,

the eager thirst for new knowledge, the superhuman bravery, which

characterized the epoch of maritime discovery, are symptoms that reveal

to us the highly wrought condition of the European mind at the time. A

study of contemporary chronicles and letters cannot fail to bring home

to us the singular intensity with which the thrill of venturesome

romance was felt in every fibre of man's being.

The impulse thus given to free thinking must have been extremely

powerful. It is customary to attribute the brilliant efflorescence of

the human mind in the sixteenth century to the revival of Greek

learning. Without seeking to diminish the respect due to that mighty

cause, it may be contended that the influence of maritime discovery was

equally important. While the Greek renaissance brought men into

wholesome and stimulating intercourse with the highest achievements of

literature, art, and philosophy, the discovery of the New World

impressed upon them, as nothing had ever done before, the feasibleness

of doing things in novel ways. With the wholesale displacement of

commercial relations, the European mind burst the bounds of the snug

little world to which its habits and theories, its politics civil and

ecclesiastical, its science and its theology, had been adapted. The

sudden and unprecedented widening of the environment soon set up a

general fermentation of ideas. There was nothing accidental in Martin

Luther's coming in the next generation after Columbus. Nor was it

strange that in the following age the English mind, wrought to its

highest tension under the combined influences of Renaissance,

Reformation, and maritime adventure, should have put forth a literature

the boldest and grandest that had ever appeared; that the era of Raleigh

and Frobisher and the early Puritans should have seen even the highest

mark of Greek achievement surpassed by Shakespeare. The gigantic

revolution set on foot by Copernicus was already in full progress, the

era of Descartes was just arriving, and the next century was to see

modern scientific method receive its supreme illustration at the hands

of Newton, while the principles of freedom in thought and speech were to

find invincible champions in Milton and Locke.

Such was the age in which the work of English colonization in America

was beginning. In looking for the origins of liberal thought in America,

it is chiefly with English-speaking America that we are concerned. The

Spanish mind, indeed, felt strongly the stimulus of the maritime

discoveries and the contact with strange races of men, until an age of

chivalrous enterprise bloomed forth in the literature of Calderon and

Lope de Vega and Cervantes; but the new spirit was not strong enough to

prevail over an ecclesiastical organization that had been growing in

power since the Visigothic times. The higher intellectual life of Spain

perished in the fires of the Inquisition, and art and song failed to

lead the way to science and free thought; no Spanish Locke or Newton

followed in the train of a Lope and a Murillo, but so lately as the year

1771 the University of Salamanca prohibited the teaching of the law of

gravitation as discordant with revealed religion.[18] With such a state

of things in the mother country, liberal thought in the Spanish colonies

was a plant of very slow growth. As for France at the end of the

sixteenth century, there was a sturdy intellectual life there which no

efforts of tyranny could more than partially repress; but circumstances

threw the work of colonization into the hands of the Jesuits, and

accordingly the history of New France, while eminent for devoted bravery

and heroic endurance, shows scarcely a trace of liberal thinking either

in politics or in matters pertaining to religion. Not with the French

and Spanish portions of America, therefore, but with the colonies that

developed into the United States, is our inquiry concerned.

The first and most obvious consideration which strikes us is that while

the two centuries following the discovery of America witnessed an

unprecedented awakening of the European mind, yet it was only with those

nations that had retained self-government that this intellectual

awakening was to come to prompt and full fruition. From the British

islands and the Netherlands came the kind of public policy that allowed

free thinking to take deep root and send up a thrifty tree of liberty.

The planting of such seed in the spacious virgin soil of the New World

was doubtless the greatest of all the manifold unforeseen results for

which Columbus opened the way. It made political freedom the strongest

power on earth, and thus favoured the attainment of that equable

flexibility of mind which allows the thought to play freely about the

facts which are laid before it. Not in a moment was such a grand result

achieved; its complete realization has not yet come, and none of us may

live to see it, yet toward that goal the whole impetus of men's

civilizing work is tending, and there is no power that can prevent the

consummation. Year by year, no matter how grave the questions with which

we have to deal, we are becoming more and more able to let our minds

play freely with them, to turn them hither and thither till all sides be

seen and all aspects duly considered.

Not all in a moment, I say, has such a desirable result been achieved.

So far is it, moreover, from having been brought about by conscious

human effort that mankind have in general struggled desperately against

it. Compared with the mass of men, it is only a few minds that have

learned to regard absolute freedom of thought as something to be

desired. Though the colonization of America came at a time when men's

minds were stirred by novel ideas as never before, though the men of

that generation were moving irrepressibly toward liberality of thought,

yet there were very few who had any liking for liberal thought, or any

good word to bestow upon it. There were few who doubted that absolute

truth was attainable concerning the most abstruse questions of

philosophy and religion, and an exactly true belief on minute points of

theology was deemed necessary for one's personal salvation. Changes in

opinion simply wrought a transfer of allegiance from one orthodoxy to

another, and the new orthodoxy felt bound as much as the old one to

persecute all who refused such allegiance. From this point of view the

history of the progress of liberal thought becomes curiously

interesting, for it shows how one of the most momentous revolutions in

human life has steadily gone on in spite of the inveterate antagonism of

the very men concerned in bringing it about! To a considerable extent,

the history has been the same over a large part of the globe. The causes

which have been at work in America have also been at work in Europe, and

even beyond; and the liberal thought with which we are familiar is

characteristic not so much of America as of the latter part of the

nineteenth century. But along with the general causes there have been

local causes which have especially concerned the New World, and a clear

account of the matter requires us to indicate both the one and the

other.

A Century of Science, and Other Essays · 第 6 / 25 段