OUTLINE OF THE RECONSTITUTION

Inasmuch as the dream is one of my own, I may be permitted to testify that

it was unmistakably connected with a scratching sensation at my ear, as I

distinctly perceived on awaking. This stimulation proceeded obviously from a

mouse, which I had time to observe in close proximity, as it remained

perched on the bedclothes, until my own startled movements put it to flight.

Tracing the stimulation from this external source, I shall try to maintain

the following interpretation:--

First, that the dream is an associative reaction to the sensation of

scratching, in the form of evocations of imagery related in experience to

this sensory element; and that the dream-process was a part of the

perception, or recognition or apperception of the stimulus.

Second, that this reaction--let us name it apperception of the stimulus--

took place slowly and imperfectly, owing to the state of sleep, so that the

reaction was, to begin with, only remotely relevant to the stimulus, but

improved in relevancy with successive evocations, until the mental

representation closely approximated the character of the stimulus.

Third, that in and among the secondary images[27] so evoked, incidental

processes of thought, tertiary compoundings of these images, were

immediately set up; the selection and re-arrangement of these secondary and

tertiary features, constituting the revelation of a significant state of

mind which had preceded the dream.

Specifically, in addition to the mental response to the external stimulus,

there was a phantasy representing an imaginary wish-fulfilment: namely the

desire to forsake the study of histology, with the eye-straining search

through the microscope, in favor of the study of reflex-action or

reflexology.

My contention is that this blended response[28] to a physical and to a

psychic cue arose very naturally and simply out of a single context,

prepared by events of the night before; and I would show that by comparing

the phantasy with this context, it is possible to reconstitute the dream in

a way that amounts to a refutation of the two other interpretations, which I

have essayed in accordance with the methods of Freud and of Jung,

respectively.

The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Volume 10 · 第 130 / 162 题