THE PERSONALITY OF SOCRATES

It is difficult to construct a biographic sketch of Socrates in a

chronological and systematic order. He was born in the year 469 B. C. His

father was Sophroniscus, a sculptor, and his mother Phaenarete, a midwife.

He followed his father's vocation and it is believed that he showed poor

skill in the profession. We know nothing of his early intellectual and moral

development. Since he was bred in Athens, he most probably received the

usual education peculiar to that age. He was a soldier and took part in

military campaigns and wars. It is maintained that in military life he

displayed considerable bravery, endurance and fortitude. The exact date of

his appearance in public arena is difficult to ascertain, however, "in the

traditions of his followers he is almost uniformly represented as an old, or

as a gray-headed man."[5.]

There are distinctive traits in the personality of Socrates that are worthy

of emphasis because of their dynamic import.

He was described as eccentric in his general mode of conduct. He "strutted

proudly barefoot along the streets of Athens; he was careless and shabby in

his dress; in his manner he was affected and haughty and was subject to

ecstatic trances and visions. During these trances he would maintain a

standing posture for hours, buried in his thoughts, and was quite oblivious

to the external world. There was a celebrated occasion in the camp at

Poteidaice, when Socrates was not quite forty; on that occasion he stood

motionless from early morning on one day till sunrise on the next, right

through a night when there was a very hard frost. When the sun rose he said

his prayer and went about his business." [6.] It is also claimed that he

would give vent to bursts of anger and fiery passion.

Ever since early boyhood Socrates is supposed to have heard an inner voice,

which he called a divine sign. It came to him quite often both on important

and on insignificant occasions. According to Xenophon, this voice gave him

both negative and positive warnings; however, Plato holds that this voice

only exercised its influence in opposing the execution of certain things.

"And not only was he generally convinced" says Zeller, "that he stood and

acted in the service of God, but he also held that supernatural suggestions

were communicated to him, not only through the medium of public oracles, but

also in dreams, and more particularly by a peculiar kind of higher

inspiration which goes by the name of the Socratic daimoviov."[7.]

Even by his contemporaries he was regarded as singular and eccentric and his

general behavior was ever foreign to his compatriots. Indeed Lelut [(8)]

boldly asserts that Socrates was "un fou." Nevertheless "attempts were not

wanting to excuse him," so writes Zeller, "either on the ground of the

universal superstition of his age and nation, or else of his having a

physical tendency to fanaticism."[9.]

Another interesting feature in the life of Socrates is that he married late

and that his matrimonial life was far from being happy, and in the words of

Schwegler, "He nowhere shows much regard for his wife and children; the

notorious, though altogether too much exaggerated ill-nature of Xantippe,

leads us to suspect, however, that his domestic relations were not the most

happy."[10.] It is also important to note that there was a turning point in

the history of his life when he took up the preaching of philosophy. It must

be borne in mind that he took no money for his teaching and at the same time

he left his wife and children destitute. In regard to this Draper remarks,

"There is surely something wrong in a man's life when the mother of his

children is protesting against his conduct, and her complaints are

countenanced by the community."[11.]

It is also significant that Socrates displayed a certain degree of

masochism; our historians tell us that Socrates would deny himself bodily

comforts and insist on enduring hardship. Xenophon in Memorabilia says:

"But they knew that Socrates lived with the utmost contentment on very small

means, that he was most abstinent from every kind of pleasure, and that he

swayed those with whom he conversed just as he pleased by his

arguments."[12.] Again, "Is it not the duty of every man to consider that

temperance is the foundation of every virtue, and to establish the

observance of it in his mind before all things? For who, without it, can

either learn anything good or sufficiently practice it? Who, that is a

slave to pleasure is not in an ill condition both as to his body and his

mind? It appears to me, by Juno, that a free man ought to pray that he may

never meet with a slave of such a character, and that he who is a slave to

pleasure should pray to the gods that he may find well-disposed masters; for

by such means only can a man of that sort be saved."[13.] And, "He appeared

also to me, by such discourses as the following, to exhort his hearers to

practice temperance in their desires for food, drink, sensual gratification,

and sleep, and endurance of cold, heat and labor."[14.]

Although he condemned poederastia, yet he was always fond of the male sex,

particularly of the young. This, however, may be explained on the ground

that his object was to appeal to the young. Nevertheless, dynamic psychology

demands a deeper meaning for such a motive. In this connection it would be

interesting to quote Xenophon: "As to love, his counsel was to abstain

rigidly from familiarity with beautiful persons; for he observed that it was

not easy to be in communication with such persons, and observe continence.

Hearing, on one occasion, that Critobulus, the son of Criton, had kissed the

son of Alcibiades, a handsome youth, he asked Xenophon, in the presence of

Critobulus, saying, "Tell me, Xenophon, did you not think that Critobulus

was one of the modest rather than the forward, one of the thoughtful rather

than of the thoughtless and inconsiderate?" Certainly," replied Xenophon.

"You must now, then, think him extremely headstrong and daring; one who

would even spring upon drawn swords, and leap into the fire." "And what,"

said Xenophon, "have you seen him doing, that you form this opinion of him?"

"Why, has he not dared," rejoined Socrates, "to kiss the son of Alcibiades,

a youth extremely handsome, and in the flower of his age?" "If such a deed,"

returned Xenophon, "is one of daring and peril, I think that even I could

undergo such peril." "Unhappy man!" exclaimed Socrates, "and what do you

think that you incur by kissing a handsome person? Do you not expect to

become at once a slave instead of a freeman? To spend much money upon

hurtful pleasures? To have too much occupation to attend to anything

honourable and profitable? And to be compelled to pursue what not even a mad

man would pursue?" "By Hercules," said Xenophon, "what extraordinary power

you represent to be in a kiss!" "Do you wonder at this?" rejoined Socrates;

"are you not aware that the Tarantula, an insect not as large as half an

obolus, by just touching a part of the body with its mouth, wears men down

with pain, and deprives them of their senses?" "Yes, indeed," said

Xenophon, "but the Tarantula infuses something when it bites." "And do you

not think, foolish man," rejoined Socrates, "that beautiful persons infuses

something when they kiss, something which you do not see? Do you not know

that the animal, which they call a handsome and beautiful object, is so much

more formidable than the Tarantula, as those insects instil something when

they touch, but this creature, without even touching, but if a person only

looks at it, though from a very great distance, instils something of such

potency, as to drive people mad? Perhaps indeed Cupids are called archers

for no other reason but because the beautiful wound from a distance. But I

advise you, Xenophon, whenever you see any handsome person, to flee without

looking behind you; and I recommend to you, Critobulus, to absent yourself

from hence for a year, for perhaps you may in that time, though hardly

indeed, be cured of your wound." Thus he thought that those should act with

regard to objects of love who were not secure against the attractions of

such objects; objects of such a nature, that if the body did not at all

desire them, the mind would not contemplate them, and which, if the body did

desire them, should cause us no trouble. For himself, he was evidently so

disciplined with respect to such matters, that he could more easily keep

aloof from the fairest and most blooming objects than others from the most

deformed and unattractive. Such was the state of his feelings in regard to

eating, drinking, and amorous gratification; and he believed that he

himself, with self-restraint, would have no less pleasure from them, than

those who took great trouble to pursue such gratifications, and that he

would suffer far less anxiety."[15.]

There is another interesting anecdote which is worthy of mention: "The

Syrian soothsayer and physiognomist, Zopyrus, saw in the countenance of

Socrates the imprint of strong sensuality. Loud protests were raised by the

assembled disciples, but Socrates silenced them with the remark: 'Zopyrus is

not mistaken; however, I have conquered those desires.' "[16.]

It is also evident that Socrates' mother must have played some role in his

mental life. It should be recalled that at first he followed his father's

profession, which seemingly made no impression upon him, and later he took

up his new vocation, preaching philosophy, which he loved to identify with

that of his mother, and indeed by reason of this the positive side of the

Socratic method is known as "the art of intellectual midwifery." "Socrates

compared himself," writes Schwegler, "with his mother, Phaenarete, a

midwife, because his office was rather to help others bring forth thoughts

than to produce them himself, and because he took upon himself to

distinguish the birth of an empty thought from one rich in content."[17.]

Further evidence of the deep reverence for his mother is seen in Memorabilia

where his eldest son, Lamprocles, finds fault with his mother, and Socrates,

though apparently entertaining very little love for his wife, yet takes up a

defensive attitude towards her and offers the following argument to his son:

"Yet you are displeased at your mother, although you well know that whatever

she says, she not only says nothing with intent to do you harm, but that she

wishes you more good than any other human being. Or do you suppose that your

mother meditates evil towards you?" "No indeed," said Lamprocles, "that I do

not imagine." "Do you then say that this mother," rejoined Socrates, "who is

so benevolent to you; who, when you are ill, takes care of you to the utmost

of her power that you may recover your health, and that you may want nothing

that is necessary for you, and who, besides, entreats the gods for many

blessings on your head, and pays vows for you, is a harsh mother? For my

part, I think that if you cannot endure such a mother, you cannot endure

anything that is good." [18.]

And in Crito, Socrates relates a dream shortly before his death, in which

his mother appeared, and to quote Plato: "Crito says, 'And what can this

dream have been?' Socrates replied, 'I thought a woman came to me, tall and

fair, and clothed in white, and she called me and said 'Socrates, Socrates,

in three days' time you will come to the fertile land, Phthia.' "[19.]

To sum up briefly, the personality of Socrates showed some psychopathic

traits. It must also be borne in mind that in that critical period, middle

age, a sudden change occurred in his mental life when he suddenly commenced

to exhibit profound interest in preaching philosophy. Moreover, it must be

emphasized that he apparently reacted to hallucinations of an auto psychic

nature. The self-asceticism, and most probably the mother-complex cannot be

passed without mention. Although he presented these negative qualities,

nevertheless he left a great school of philosophy, which beyond doubt is

still felt in the intellectual and moral world. Despite this, Athens

committed an unpardonable crime in putting Socrates to death. He, like

other martyrs, shared the same fate of the mob. Lowell's verse very justly

applies to Socrates:

"Truth forever on the scaffold; Wrong forever on the throne."[20.]

With this characterization of Socrates, we are now in a position to discuss

that part of his philosophy which has a definite bearing on modern

psychopathology. Three important phases of his philosophy come under

consideration:

The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Volume 10 · 第 46 / 162 题