Some progress has been made in the treatment of manure piles

LITTLE BLUE BOOK NO. 860

Edited by E. Haldeman-Julius

Our Insect Enemies

Vance Randolph

Drawings by Peter Quinn

HALDEMAN-JULIUS COMPANY

GIRARD, KANSAS

Copyrighted, 1925,

Haldeman-Julius Company

CONTENTS

Page

Houseflies and Their Kindred 4

Mosquitoes and Disease 28

Life Among the Bedbugs 43

Lice, Crabs and Cooties 47

Our Friend the Cockroach 54

Chiggers, Ticks and Fleas 57

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Page

Fig. I. The Metamorphosis of the Housefly (_Musca domestica_). 12

Fig. II. Malaria and its Carrier. 33

Fig. III. Three kinds of Lice. 51

Fig. IV. Some Common Cockroaches. 58

Fig. V. Chiggers and Ticks. 61

OUR INSECT ENEMIES

HOUSEFLIES AND THEIR KINDRED

The common housefly (_Musca domestica_) is perhaps more thoroughly

domesticated than any other insect; it lives and flourishes wherever

man has established his settlements, and does not thrive elsewhere. It

is mentioned by many of the ancient writers, and has evidently been

associated with man from the remotest antiquity, doubtless adapting

itself gradually to his changing modes of life. It still breeds in the

refuse which accumulates about his buildings, and still invades his

home to partake of his food. When one considers the number of flies

which get into modern dwellings despite glass and wire and modern

insecticides, it is difficult to understand how our sturdy fathers

managed to survive the summers in mediaeval Europe. Picture Thomas

Aquinas battling with swarms of flies for his food! The housefly’s

favorite breeding place has always been in horse manure, and man has

until recent years had great quantities of this nutritious substance

about him; with the coming of the automobile this condition has been

changed somewhat, but even the cleanest of American cities still

affords sufficient decaying matter to assure a bountiful crop of flies.

At some future day perhaps we shall have cities so spotless that there

will be nowhere a speck of garbage large enough to nourish a maggot,

but that day is still to come, and it doth not yet appear what we shall

be.

Meanwhile, as Herrick says, the housefly is with us always. “They are

present from early spring to late fall, even remaining far into the

winter. They are troublesome in kitchens and dining rooms because of

their abundance, their proneness to get into food, and their generally

filthy habits. Until recent years the housefly has been generally

regarded as somewhat of a scavenger and has been considered of value

to humanity because of its aid in the removal of wastes that are a

menace to human welfare. The eggs of the housefly are often deposited

on decaying vegetable matter that is allowed to accumulate in the

vicinity of human habitations and the maggots that hatch from the eggs

live on this decaying matter and aid in destroying it. Thus it must be

conceded, perhaps, that houseflies do assist somewhat in the removal of

foul and dangerous waste matters and, to this extent, are of benefit.

On the other hand, it has been conclusively shown that this modicum

of benefit is greatly overbalanced by their role in disseminating

dangerous diseases. It has been shown that houseflies carry the germs

of cholera, typhoid fever, cholera infantum, and tropical dysentery on

their feet, legs, bodies and in their digestive tracts. There can be no

doubt of the responsibility of the housefly for much sickness and many

deaths.”

Although the adult housefly is equally fond of fresh and putrid matter,

flitting from filth to food and back again, the eggs are always laid in

decaying substances, preferably horse manure. In the absence of this

delicacy the eggs may be deposited in human excrement, or even cow

manure if it is not too dry. A single female fly often deposits one

hundred and fifty eggs at a single sitting, and lays as many as six or

seven hundred in the course of a season.

The egg is white and shaped like a grain of wheat; it measures

about one-twentieth of an inch in length, and hatches in from ten

to twenty-four hours, the period of incubation varying with the

temperature. The second or larval stage is represented by a wormlike

creature called a maggot, which crawls about and devours great

quantities of nourishing manure. When the maggot is about five or six

days old it has attained a length of nearly three-eighths of an inch,

and transforms into the pupa; it is no longer active, ceases to take

food, and the outer skin turns into a hard, brown, dry case called a

puparium. After five or six days of rest the puparium is burst open and

the adult fly crawls out.

The newly emerged flies mate within two or three days, and the young

females are soon laying their first batch of eggs. Thus the whole

development may occur in about fourteen days, and Herrick thinks that

in Washington, D. C., it may be complete in ten days or less, according

to the temperature, with ten or twelve generations in a summer. “One

can hardly realize,” says Herrick, “the enormous numbers that such

rapid development is capable of producing. Inside of two months, one

female fly can give rise to many millions of progeny. For the purpose

of illustration, we will assume that a female fly lays 100 eggs. If

these hatch and all the larvae come to maturity, about one-half will

probably be males and the other half females. Then at the end of the

first generation there will be fifty egg-laying females. At this rate,

at the end of the eighth generation there would be produced about

1,875,000,000,000 adults. Of course, in nature, a very large part of

these would die before reaching maturity, so that actually one female

would probably never produce such an enormous number of individuals.

However, even under normal conditions tremendous numbers are produced.”

The adult housefly is unhappily too familiar to require a lengthy

description. The total length is about one-fourth of an inch, there are

two membranous wings and six hairy legs, while the thorax is gray with

four dark longitudinal stripes above. Besides the hairs and bristles on

the body and legs, which entangle great numbers of germs, the sticky

_pulvilli_ of the feet gather bacteria as if they had been especially

developed for that purpose. Thus every housefly scatters bacteria

broadcast wherever he goes; one has only to allow a fly to walk

across a plate of sterile gelatin to see large colonies of bacteria

produced in every foot-print. Esten and Mason’s examination of some 400

specimens showed that the number of bacteria carried ranged from 550 to

6,600,000 per fly, with an average of nearly a million and a quarter.

The general impression is that the housefly does not travel any great

distance from its birth-place, but there is considerable doubt

about this matter. Hewitt has taken them flying at least eighty feet

above the ground, and it is obvious that small insects which rise

so high may be carried long distances by the wind. Copeman, Howlett

and Merriman have attacked the problem by marking large numbers of

specimens, releasing them, and then watching for them in traps set at

various distances; they recovered several which had travelled more than

three-fourths of a mile. Dr. Hodge found plenty of houseflies on the

cribs of the Cleveland waterworks, which are located six miles out in

Lake Erie, and which offer no breeding places for flies. He naturally

concluded that they were blown six miles by the wind.

It has been pretty well established that adult flies do not retain

and disseminate disease germs which they swallowed as maggots in the

manure, but only those which they acquire in the adult state. It has

been definitely proved, however, that the bacilli of typhoid fever are

carried on the bodies and legs of houseflies, and also that the bacilli

are often swallowed and survive the passage through the body, as living

bacilli have frequently been demonstrated in flyspecks. The most

important practical consideration is, of course, the actual frequency

with which houseflies do transfer pathogenic organisms from filth to

food intended for human consumption, thus spreading disease, and this

is in its very nature a difficult matter to investigate.

Typhoid fever is a disease affecting the intestines, and the bacilli

which cause it frequently remain in the body for long periods after

the patient has apparently recovered. The germs are passed out in the

urine and fecal matter. As Herrick puts it: “If the excreta or urine

containing these bacilli are deposited where they are accessible to

flies, for instance in open privies, the chances are high that the

bacilli will be carried on the bodies of these insects back to the

kitchens and dining rooms and be deposited on our food. During the

Spanish-American War, flies were traced by their whitened feet from

the lime-sprinkled, open latrines or privies to the dining tables of

the soldiers in camp. It makes one shudder to think of the thousands

of open closets in the small towns of the United States to which flies

have access and in which they breed and from which they may come direct

to our kitchens and dining rooms.”

Excluding the greater variability of the water supply, the fact that

typhoid is so much more prevalent in country districts than in the

city may be due almost entirely to the abundance of flies, since

other opportunities for infection are no greater than in the city.

Certain South American cities have very good water, but typhoid rages

nevertheless, because the natives expose their excreta within a few

feet of the street markets, and myriads of flies carry the bacilli

from the dunghill to the food. “In our own country,” says Brues, “the

seasonal incidence of typhoid fever corresponds to some extent with fly

prevalence, and still more significant is its greater summer prevalence

in regions where systems for sewage disposal are not generally

installed.... The greater uniformity throughout the year in New York,

where the opportunities for fly-borne infection are curtailed, is very

marked. Another way in which the housefly can aid in the spread of

typhoid is through infecting milk on dairy farms where carriers are

present and offer the flies a chance to become infected.”

The vessels in an ordinary country dairy are nearly always more or less

accessible to flies, and warm milk is an excellent medium in which to

cultivate bacteria. When a fly which has been feeding on the excreta

of a typhoid patient falls into a can of milk, there is a very good

chance that the disease may be spread all along the milkman’s route.

Dr. Taylor, of the Colorado State Board of Health, reports a case of

this sort: “In the city of Denver we had a very sad as well as a plain

demonstration of the transmission of typhoid fever by flies and milk.

Early in August of this year the wife of a dairyman was taken with

typhoid fever, remaining at home about three weeks before her removal

to the hospital, August 28. During the first two weeks of September we

received reports of numerous cases of typhoid fever in the northern

portion of Denver, and upon investigation found that all these cases

had been securing their milk from this dairy.

“An inspection of the dairy was then made, and in addition to learning

of the illness of the dairyman’s wife, we also found the dairyman

himself suffering with a mild case of typhoid, but still up and

delivering milk. The water supply of the dairy was fairly good.

However, we found that the stools of both the wife and husband

had been deposited in an open privy vault located only thirty-five

feet from the milk house, which was unscreened and open to flies.

The gelatin cultures exposed for thirty minutes in the rear of the

privy vault and in the milk house among the milk cans gave numerous

colonies of typhoid bacilli, as well as colon bacilli and the ordinary

germ-life. The source of infection in the dairyman’s wife’s case is

unknown, but I am positive that in all the cases which occurred on this

milk route the infection was due to bacilli carried from this vault by

flies and deposited upon the milk cans, separator and utensils in the

milk house, thereby contaminating the milk. The dairyman supplied milk

to 143 customers. Fifty-five cases of typhoid fever occurred and three

deaths resulted therefrom.”

As long ago as 1873 Dr. Nichols noted that the number of cholera cases

on his ship seemed to vary directly with the abundance of flies. Later

experiments demonstrated the presence of the cholera bacillus upon the

bodies and in the excreta of flies fed upon cholera-infected material,

and it has been shown that flies sometimes transfer the cholera bacilli

from human excreta to milk. Dr. Tsuzuki, of the Japanese Army Medical

Service, found the germs of cholera upon flies taken in cholera-ridden

houses, and demonstrated that flies carry the organisms from place

to place. Macrae, commenting on an outbreak of cholera in a jail in

India, remarked that the place was infested with “a plague of flies ...

which were present in swarms when the disease broke out, and it was

an observation of daily experience to see them settling on cholera

stools whenever possible.” Dr. Macrae goes on to say that the flies

undoubtedly carried the cholera germs to the prisoners’ food, and adds:

“The practical lesson is, that flies should be looked upon in the light

of poisonous agencies of the worst kind during cholera epidemics, and

it is clear that if they find access to poison they will carry and

distribute it, and every possible means should be taken to prevent

their getting into contact with either food or drink of any kind, and

to those having to deal with large bodies of men it is a lesson more

easily learnt than put into practice.”

Because of the flies’ liking for expectorated saliva, it has long been

suspected that tuberculosis may be carried about by these insects.

Several investigators have carried out experiments in which flies have

been fed upon the sputa of consumptives, and the tuberculosis bacilli

have been found in their intestines and fly specks. Frederick T. Lord,

after a long series of laboratory investigations, concluded that: “(1)

Flies may ingest tubercular sputum and excrete tubercle bacilli, the

virulence of which may last for at least fifteen days. (2) The danger

of human infection from tubercular fly specks is by the ingestion

of the specks on food. Spontaneous liberation of tubercle bacilli

from fly specks is unlikely. If mechanically disturbed, infection

of the surrounding air may occur.” Dr. Lord goes on to suggest that

“tubercular material (sputum, pus from discharging sinuses, fecal

matter from patients with intestinal tuberculosis, etc.) should be

carefully protected from flies, lest they act as disseminators of

the tubercle bacilli. During the fly season greater attention should

be paid to the screening of rooms and hospital wards containing

patients with tuberculosis and laboratories where tubercular material

is examined. As these precautions would not eliminate fly infection by

patients at large, foodstuffs should be protected from flies which may

already have ingested tubercular material.”

[Illustration:

Fig. I. The Metamorphosis of the Housefly (_Musca domestica_). A,

eggs, considerably enlarged; B, young maggot; C, puparium; D, pupa;

E, adult.

]

Numerous British army surgeons long ago hazarded the guess that flies

carry dysentery, but the first clear case is that of an epidemic which

occurred in the Worcester State Hospital in 1910. Houseflies were

especially abundant at the time, and Dr. Orton, after a painstaking

experimental study of the affair, concluded that flies were entirely

responsible for the epidemic.

There is now a fairly general agreement that flies spread the organisms

which cause the infantile diarrhea known as summer complaint, which

kills more infants than any other single cause except lack of

sufficient and proper food. Fraser, Nash and others have noted that the

more flies the more cases of summer complaint, and Sandilands explains

the immunity of the children of the rich by the smaller number of flies

in their houses. It is certainly true that the mortality of bottle-fed

infants is very much higher than of breast-fed babies, but whether

Jackson is justified in attributing this mainly to the infection of

cow’s milk by flies is a question.

Lucian Howe has long contended that purulent ophthalmia--the sore-eye so

common up and down the valley of the Nile--is distributed mainly by

the housefly. The disease is always most prevalent where the flies are

most abundant, and in flyless desert regions there is practically no

ophthalmia. The natives are singularly dirty and indolent, and flies are

often seen to settle undisturbed about a pair of badly infected eyes.

Dr. Howe has captured a number of these flies, and found that their

feet were covered with the same bacilli found in the secretion of the

inflamed conjunctiva.

Braun, Demetriades and others report that gonorrheal and other eye

infections are often carried by houseflies. Welander, in 1896,

according to Howard, “observed an interesting case where an old

bed-ridden woman in a hospital became infected. It seems that her bed

was along side that of another patient who had blennorrhea, but that

a screen which did not reach the ceiling separated the beds. Thus all

means of infection except through the agency of flies was apparently

absent. The investigator found that flies bore living gonococci upon

their feet three hours after they had been soiled with secretion, since

they infected sterilized plates with which they came in contact.”

Nuttall and Jepson, after reviewing the entire literature of the

subject, think that “the evidence regarding the spread of Egyptian

ophthalmia by flies appears to be conclusive, and the possibility of

gonorrheal secretions being conveyed by flies cannot be denied.”

Bubonic plague is now definitely known to be spread by fleas which are

parasitic on rats, but many observers still cling to the view that the

housefly also acts as a distributor. It is certainly true that flies

are killed by feeding upon the bodies of persons who die of the plague,

and Yersin, at Hong Kong in 1894, showed that these dead flies contain

active plague bacilli. Whether the fly plays any serious part in the

actual spread of bubonic plague is still a mooted question.

The housefly has plenty of natural enemies, but they do not seem to

reduce the number to any material extent. One of the most destructive

is a minute fungus which grows inside the fly’s body until it finally

causes death. The dead flies one finds on window panes in the fall,

surrounded by a whitish ring, are the victims of these fungus growths.

There are several species of these fungi; in some cases at least the

attack begins with a spore which attaches itself to the outside of the

body, and grows a long thread-like root which enters the body through

one of the spiracles or breathing pores.

Several species of protozoan parasites have been found in the

intestines of flies, along with a few minute parasitic worms, but

they are not known to cause any great amount of inconvenience. Small

red mites are often seen fastened to flies’ bodies; some of them are

true parasites which suck the juices from the body of their host, and

look very much like the chiggers which annoy the higher animals in the

Southern States. With other mites, according to Howard, “the flies

simply act as aeroplanes to carry the mites from one place to another.

A free ride seems to be the only object for which they have attached

themselves to the fly.”

Spiders, if given an opportunity, destroy a great many flies, but as

the webs are usually destroyed by the housekeeper’s broom they do very

little execution. The little centipede known as the water bug kills a

great many flies, but as it works at night gets little credit for its

good offices.

Hornets are sometimes seen to capture and carry off houseflies, but

it is doubtful if any great number of the pests are killed by these

insects. An English entomologist named Westwood once circulated a story

to the effect that “the Americans, aware of their service in destroying

flies, sometimes suspend a hornet’s nest in their parlors.” A little

later one Benjamin D. Walsh, an American, wrote that “some persons in

America have turned the insect-devouring propensity of the hornets to

good purpose by suspending one of their nests in a house much infested

by the common housefly. In such a situation we have been told that they

soon make a clearance of the obnoxious flies; and so long as you do

not meddle with them they will not meddle with you.” To me these two

quotations are the sheerest nonsense; any one who has any acquaintance

with hornets will find it difficult to visualize an American farmer

intentionally filling his house with hornets for any reason whatsoever.

I have never been able to find anybody who has tried out this method;

if there are any such among my readers I should like very much to hear

from them. Please address me in care of the publisher of this booklet.

The logical way to combat the housefly would be to destroy the eggs and

maggots as we do in the case of the mosquito, but it is not practical

at present. In rural districts, where the dung of livestock is always

lying about, and the human excreta exposed in shallow open closets,

very little progress has been made. Of course, the danger of typhoid

may be avoided by keeping the excreta of typhoid patients where flies

cannot get at it, and the flies certainly could not spread tuberculosis

if no tubercular sputum was exposed. These facts are taken advantage

of in the cities, where there are plenty of flies, but very little

typhoid, because the water closet system is such that flies cannot get

access to the excreta. In communities where there is no adequate sewage

disposal and where flies are plentiful, the individual can only screen

them out of his own dwelling as best he can. Howard estimates that more

than $10,000,000 are spent every year for screen wire in the United

States alone.

Many ingenious devices for destroying flies inside houses are on the

market--poisons, sticky fly paper, fly traps and fly swatters. One

of the most useful of these is sticky fly paper cut in strips and

suspended from the ceiling. This will often clear a room of flies

when the ordinary sheets of the same paper lying flat on a table are

quite inefficacious. In Japanese hospitals, says Howard, “they take

a whole potato and stick it full of toothpicks, put fly paste on the

toothpicks, and hang the potatoes from the ceiling over the patient’s

bed on a cord. The flies all gather on the potato, and when it is full

they throw the potato away and make a new trap. The toothpicks are

placed about one-fourth of an inch apart, and the potato presents the

appearance of a porcupine.”

C. F. Hodge is all for building large traps and placing them out of

doors in early Spring, arguing that a great many newly emerged flies

are thus caught before they reproduce, and that it is better to catch

one fly in the Spring than thousands in the Autumn. Brues even says

that “practical traps whereby fly-larvae in stored manure may be caught

and destroyed before transformation have also been devised.”

Some progress has been made in the treatment of manure piles with

poisons. Howard found that either chloride of lime or kerosene kill

the maggots all right, but the cost of both is prohibitive. Davis

worked with iron sulphate and reported that manure could be cleaned

of maggots and deodorized at a cost of about two cents per horse per

day. Howard, Herns and others have advocated fly-tight pits or bins for

the reception of manure, and these have been adopted in many places,

particularly in California. The regulations of the District of Columbia

specify that all manure must be kept in “covered receptacles,” and it

has been found that a tight-covered barrel suffices for a one-horse

stable. Some workers in the Federal Department of Agriculture have

carried out a series of experiments indicating that borax, hellebore,

and calcium cyanide are highly destructive to maggots in horse manure,

and it is quite probable that some very cheap and simple treatment will

soon be developed.

The proper disposal of human excreta is another problem that is vitally

connected with the checking of germ-laden flies. As Howard says, “the

average person in the large city has no idea of the fact that there

are many comparatively intelligent citizens who in sanitary matters

have not even reached the grade of civilization which demands the

sanitary privy. Stiles, in the course of his great work in the Southern

States, has brought together some startling figures. He is responsible

for the statement that of 4,825 farm houses in six different states

2,664, or fifty-five per cent, have no privies of any kind; of 2,499

houses inhabited by white people, thirty-five and three-tenths per cent

have absolutely none, and of 2,326 inhabited by negroes seventy-six

and eight-tenths per cent have none. And what shall be said of the

condition of a large part--the very great majority--of those which

do exist? The uncared-for privy is still a most important factor all

over the United States, even in portions of our most cleanly cities.”

Herrick points out that “there is no longer any excuse for the old

open box privy, cleaned out once a year. It is a menace to every house

in the vicinity as well as to individuals living perhaps hundreds of

miles away because of its possibilities in contaminating milk. Some

form of sanitary closet must be substituted.” One of the very best is

that designed by Stiles, and described in Farmer’s Bulletin 463, U. S.

Department of Agriculture. The bulletin is free, and the privy can be

built at a cost of five or six dollars.

Another fly which looks almost exactly like the ordinary housefly

is _Stomoxys calcitrans_, usually known as the biting housefly, but

sometimes called the stable fly because of its great abundance about

horses and cattle. The stable fly may be recognized by the fact that it

holds its head higher than the housefly, but Howard says that “the best

way to distinguish between the two flies is to allow them to walk over

your hand; if it bites it is _Stomoxys_; if it does not it is probably

the housefly.” The housefly has no mouthparts adapted for biting, but

the stable fly is provided with a sharp awl-like proboscis, and sucks

the blood from its victims. It is a great lover of direct sunshine,

and, when not engaged about cattle and horses may be seen sunning

itself on walls and fences. In damp weather it invades houses and

verandas, and it is then that the silk-clad ankles suffer. This habit

has given rise to the popular idea that houseflies bite just before a

storm. The bite is painful at the moment, but there is no subsequent

swelling or irritation; the puncture, according to Howard, does not

seem to be poisonous to man, and aside from the pain given it is far

less dangerous than a mosquito bite.

The life history of _Stomoxys_ has been worked out by Newstead, who

found that the creamy-white eggs are laid about sixty at a time in

irregular clusters, usually in manure of some kind, but frequently

in piles of decaying grass or straw. Howard reared the fly from cow

manure, and says that the egg usually hatches in two or three days.

“The larva need not be described,” he says, “because it is so similar

to that of the housefly.” Newstead found that in this stage they lived

from fourteen to twenty-one days, but that the absence of excessive

moisture and the admission of a little light materially retarded

development, which then extended over a period of thirty-one to

seventy-eight days. In the puparium the insect remained from nine to

thirteen days. The development of the species is therefore much slower

than that of the true housefly. It is Newstead’s opinion that the

winter is passed chiefly in the pupal condition.

The stable fly is considered by Austern and others to distribute

various diseases among cattle, but is probably not dangerous to

man. Brues remarks that it was once “thought to be a carrier of

poliomyelitis (infantile paralysis) but it now seems probable that

such is not the case.” Howard says, “I judge from the fact that it is

attracted to human excreta that it may become a carrier of intestinal

diseases,” but it has never been proved to be more than an accidental

agent in this matter.

Bishop reports a great outbreak of this pest in Texas, where they were

found breeding in straw stacks, and caused serious injury to cattle and

horses. A similar case recorded by Lucian Iches of Santa Fe, Argentina,

is described by Howard: “The biting flies swarmed on a large estate

in almost incredible numbers. The cattle were driven nearly crazy by

them. Certain valuable Durham bulls which were observed were covered

with the flies. They had lost their hair in large spots and the skin

was cracking. Monsieur Iches naturally sought at once for the principal

breeding places of the flies, and found them to be in the stacks

of debris from the threshing of wheat and flax. Larvae and puparia

were found by the millions in the lower portions of these piles of

straw, where some fermentation had already begun. The sensible measure

which he recommended was to have this debris burnt within forty-eight

hours after the completion of the threshing, the ashes being used for

fertilizing purposes. It turned out that there was an old provincial

law in the province of Santa Fe ordering the burning of all debris

after threshing, but it had not been carried out during recent years,

and therefore the _Stomoxys_ multiplied until this veritable plague

ensued.”

Another plague of stable flies occurred some years ago in Oregon, but

the life history was not known there and the breeding places were never

found. The severity of the pest’s bite is remarked by Osborne: “It

causes a great deal of annoyance to horses, cattle and other domestic

animals, and is frequently very troublesome to people working in places

where it abounds: Its bite is not poisonous and aside from the pain

given and the possibility of its disseminating disease, it is less

injurious than some other members of the group. When abundant, however,

the annoyance may be very great.” Bold describes the pitiable condition

of cattle bitten by the stable fly: “In some of the severe cases the

joints were so much swollen that the poor animals could not bend their

legs to lie down; and in them the inflammation rose so high as to

cause the loss of the outer skin and hair.”

The cluster fly (_Pollenia rudis_) is a little larger than the

housefly, and appears longer because the wings overlap in such a

fashion as to make the body appear very slender. The thorax bears

many short, yellow hairs, and the grayish abdomen inclines to be

iridescent. During the Summer this fly lives upon flowers and fruits,

and does not come near houses, but the adults seek sheltered places

in the Fall, and spend the Winter in large groups or clusters--hence

the name. When the clustering process happens to take place within a

human habitation the flies become a nuisance. Howard quotes one of his

correspondents from Illinois: “They seem to prefer to occupy the rooms

on the north side of the house and those that are used but little.

They gather in large bunches in the corners and along the edges of the

ceiling. They cannot be driven out like other flies, but must be killed

outright to get rid of them, and when you mash them the odor is like

that of honey. We have tried nearly everything that was recommended to

us, with no effect. It seems impossible to get rid of them, or to keep

them out of the house, for they crawl in through the smallest places in

the windows.”

They enter one by one through small cracks or crevices, and, as one of

Herrick’s correspondents writes, “screens and other devices which work

perfectly in excluding the ordinary fly are useless in keeping these

out.” W. H. Dall, describing the pest at Geneva, New York, states that

“people soon learned to look everywhere; in beds, in pillow-slips,

under table covers, behind pictures, in wardrobes, nestled in bonnets

and hats, under the edge of carpets, etc.”

We are singularly ignorant of the life history of this insect. Macquart

and Desvoidy have found _Pollenia_ larvae in manure, and the Bureau

of Entomology people reared a single specimen from cow dung. Keilin,

however, claims to have discovered the maggot living as a parasite

in certain species of earth-worms. It is said that the adults are

particularly susceptible to the same fungous diseases which attack the

housefly.

The lesser housefly (_Homalomyia canicularis_) is generally regarded by

laymen as an immature specimen of the common housefly, but is really

a distinct species, belonging to a different family altogether. The

housefly, or any other fly for that matter, does not grow at all in the

winged state--the newly emerged adult is quite as large as it will ever

be. The _Homalomyia_ maggot is very different from that of the ordinary

housefly; it measures only about one-fifth of an inch in length, and is

covered with spiny processes, to which the dirt clings and gives the

creature a mottled, dirty appearance. They develop in various kinds of

garbage and manure, being especially partial to human excrement. Hewitt

has found them very abundant in privies, and Herrick remarks that “this

habit of breeding in excreta of various kinds makes the flies dangerous

inhabitants of our rooms. They may act as conveyers of disease germs

quite as readily as the housefly. They are rapid breeders, for a

generation may be produced in two weeks in hot weather.”

The blue-bottle fly (_Calliphora erythrocephala_) has a dull-colored

thorax and a dark metallic blue abdomen. It is sometimes known as the

blow-fly, and lays its eggs on meat and dead animals, or even in sores

upon living creatures. A single female has been known to lay more than

six hundred eggs, and Hewitt says that twenty-three days is sufficient

to produce a generation. The blow-fly ordinarily lives in the open air,

but occasionally gets into houses, particularly in stormy weather.

Herrick remarks that “it has been found frequenting human feces and

for this reason may be suspected of bearing intestinal bacteria, thus

making it a fly to be dreaded.”

The so-called cheese fly (_Prophila casei_) is a little shiny black

fellow which develops in cheese, bacon, ham, chipped beef and the like.

The larva is known as the cheese skipper because of its remarkable

agility. Howard says that it will sometimes jump three or four inches,

and I have myself seen these vigorous little maggots, stimulated by

the heating of their home in a piece of Southern bacon, leap clear out

of the frying pan into the camp fire. The cheese fly is not native to

America and was probably imported in an early shipment of Swiss cheese.

The insect is not particularly dangerous, but as Howard says “it is

well to remember that not only has it been reared from dead bodies, but

that it is also attracted to excreta of all kinds.”

The moth fly (_Psychoda minuta_) is a very fragile little insect whose

broad wings are hairy like those of a moth. It is very common among

weeds, clinging to the under surfaces of leaves, and often enters

houses, passing easily through the ordinary fly screen. According to

Herrick, “the larvae of some of these flies live in cow dung, others in

decaying vegetation, while some live in water, especially sewage water

or drain water from kitchens. We have often seen hundreds of these

moth flies among the weeds overhanging a ditch carrying the drainage

water from a kitchen. We have also seen them in abundance along ditches

carrying sewage water from houses. In the first-mentioned instance they

were always present on the window panes of the kitchen, readily passing

through the ordinary wire screen. Judging them from the places in which

they breed, we would consider them unwelcome guests in our houses.” The

moth flies of Southern Europe bite human beings, and are carriers for a

disease called phlebotomus fever, but the species so far identified in

the United States probably do no particular damage.

The tsetse fly (_Glossina palpalis_), the sole distributor of the

deadly sleeping sickness which has decimated the native population

of equatorial Africa, is a near relative of our common housefly. The

reproduction of the tsetse fly is very different from that of most

insects, however. According to Brues, “the female does not deposit her

eggs, but a single one develops to the fully grown larval condition

before being deposited. This larva soon pupates in the shade beneath

the brush bordering the water where it has been dropped by the parent

fly, and later emerges in the winged adult condition. The pupae

requires such moist shade, and it is apparently for this reason alone

that the flies never occur away from the immediate vicinity of the

water. As a result of their method of development, the tsetse flies

do not multiply rapidly, and even under favorable conditions only one

larva is produced in a ten-day period.... It was thought at first

that by moving all the natives back from the edges of the water, the

flies thus left without opportunities for reinfection, would become

free from trypanosomes (the organisms causing the disease) and that

by isolating and treating cases of the disease in fly-free areas it

would be possible to eliminate them entirely. In conjunction with

this, the cutting of brush, especially about boat landings and

watering places, has been practiced as far as possible. Contrary to

expectations, it has been found that even after three or four years,

infected flies still occur along the uninhabited shores. This led to

experimentation upon animals and it is now known that various wild

antelopes as well as certain domestic animals may act as reservoirs for

the virus of sleeping sickness, which may thus persist in the complete

absence of any human subjects. As a result of this discovery the great

difficulties of combating the disease ... have been vastly increased.”

MOSQUITOES AND DISEASE

The mosquito is nothing more than a small, slender fly, very similar

to the housefly in every essential detail of its structure. There

are about sixty species and varieties in America, but the three

most common and important species are: the ordinary house mosquito

(_Culex pipiens_) which does not carry disease, the malarial mosquito

(_Anopheles quadrimaculatus_) which disseminates malaria, and the tiger

mosquito (_Aedes calopus_) which is a carrier of yellow fever.

The common house mosquito has perhaps no equal as a persistent and

universally damned destroyer of human tranquility. Heartily detested

everywhere, even by entomologists, no serious studies of the life

history were made until comparatively recent years. The female deposits

her eggs upon the surface of still water in boat-shaped masses, each

mass containing from fifty to two hundred eggs. The floating egg-mass

is always large enough to be seen with the naked eye, and often

measures a quarter of an inch in length. The eggs usually hatch in two

or three days, and the larva is the well-known wiggler which swims with

a peculiar jerky motion in every rain-barrel and roadside pool in the

country. The wiggler breathes through a tube near the caudal end of

its body, and usually hangs head downward at the surface of the water,

with the tip of the breathing tube in contact with the air. The food

consists largely of minute organisms collected by two vibrating tufts

of hair about the mouth. After a week or so of this wriggling life, the

larva is transformed into another stage called the pupa, which has a

larger head and thorax, and rides differently in the water because the

breathing tubes have shifted to the upper part of the body. In five or

six days more the skin of the pupa splits open and the adult mosquito

slowly emerges. It usually rests quietly on the floating pupa-skin for

a few moments, and then, as soon as its wings are sufficiently dried,

flies away in search of food and mates.

The male _Culex_ is much handsomer than the female, being provided

with large plume-like feelers or antennae, by which he may be easily

recognized. Another important sex-difference is that the _male doesn’t

bite_, but lives by sucking the nectar of flowers, like a bee. The

female of the species is deadlier than the male, even among mosquitoes,

and it is the female that does the blood-sucking. The mosquito’s beak

consists of several sharp lances inside a sheath, the whole apparatus

admirably adapted to pierce the human skin and transfer human blood to

the stomach of the mosquito. Incidentally some poisonous substance,

probably a salivary secretion, flows into the wound and produces more

or less inflammation and swelling. The _Culex_ or house mosquito, so

far as is known, does not transmit any disease to human beings--it is

detested only because of the pain which follows its bites, and its

intolerable buzzing.

The malarial mosquito (_Anopheles quadrimaculatus_) deposits its eggs

singly on the surface of the water, never in rafts like those of the

house mosquito. The eggs are very seldom found in barrels or tubs about

houses--the _Anopheles_ prefers ditches, or creeks, or the shallows of

slowly flowing rivers. The malarial larvae do not hang head downward at

the surface as the _Culex_ wigglers do, but lie flat just beneath the

surface film, and may be identified by this characteristic horizontal

position. The _Anopheles_ pupa does not differ greatly in appearance

from that of the house mosquito. The adult is somewhat larger than

_Culex_, and the wings are gray-spotted instead of clear. Another

important difference is this: _Culex_ alights and rests with its body

parallel to the surface which supports it, while _Anopheles_ rests with

its body at an angle--head down, tail up. Herrick says that he has seen

them “clinging to the ceiling of a horse stall by their four front

legs, with their bodies hanging almost straight downward.”

It has been known for a long time that malaria, otherwise known as

ague, or chills-and-fever, was connected in some way with stagnant

water. It was obvious enough to everybody that the disease was most

prevalent in low, swampy regions, and most people regarded it as a

result of poisonous gases which somehow arose from the surface of the

waters. The word _malaria_ means _bad air_. It was later discovered

that the real cause of the disease is a microscopic bit of jelly-like

protoplasm--a protozoan parasite which lives in the red cells of the

blood. Brues tells us that “the protozoan blood parasites which cause

malaria were first demonstrated many years ago, in 1880, by a French

surgeon, Laveran, who discovered them in the blood of persons suffering

from malaria. Five years later an Italian, Golgi, distinguished

three kinds, each associated with one of the more familiar types of

malaria. They were found to go through a regular life cycle in the red

blood corpuscles and, from analogy with other known protozoa, it was

suspected that in addition to their non-sexual generations in the human

blood there must be a sexual development in some cold-blooded animal.

Manson was led to suspect that some insect might be the secondary

host and, working on this hypothesis, Ross in India first found the

malarial parasites in a certain kind of mosquito in 1898. He had

worked for nearly three years with a common mosquito belonging to the

genus _Culex_ without result, but finally in a mosquito of the genus

_Anopheles_ was able to trace the development of the parasite. His

epoch-making discovery has since been amply confirmed and extended by

experimental proof until we now know that the various types of malarial

blood parasites complete their life cycles in anopheline mosquitoes,

the latter acting as the sole carriers of the disease.”

Malaria, then, is acquired in one way only, and that is through the

bite of the malarial mosquito. A mosquito sucks a little blood from a

malarial patient, this blood containing some of the protozoan germs

which are the immediate cause of the disease. In the stomach of the

mosquito the parasites reproduce sexually, penetrate the stomach

walls, and proceed finally to the salivary glands, from which position

they are injected into the blood of the next victim of the mosquito’s

blood-lust. The parasites reproduce asexually in the man’s red blood

corpuscles, and then burst out by millions into the liquid part of the

blood. This happens simultaneously in all parts of the body, and the

patient is shaken by the chills characteristic of the disease. Some

varieties of the germs reproduce every two days, producing what is

known as tertian fever; other types form spores every three days, and

the resulting disturbance is known as quartan fever. After a while male

and female germs appear in the patient’s blood plasma, but these never

develop unless the sufferer is bitten by another mosquito. When this

occurs, the sexual germs pass into the mosquito’s stomach, reproduce

sexually, and are distributed as described above. Another man bitten,

more non-sexual reproduction, more chills and fever, and so on _ad

infinitum_.

A healthy person may, of course, be bitten by _Anopheles_ and have

a great many malarial germs in his body without developing malarial

fever, as they sometimes lie dormant in the blood without reproducing

at all. Ross has estimated that “something like a quarter of a billion

of them must be present to produce fever.” The more infected mosquitoes

that bite one, the larger the number of germs that will be introduced,

and the more severe the disease. The essential result of all the

investigations is concisely stated by Herrick: “Malaria is caused by a

minute animal parasite that lives within the red blood corpuscles of

human beings. The parasite destroys millions of the red blood cells

that are so necessary to life, and, in addition, secretes certain

poisonous substances known as toxins, which lodge in various parts of

the body.... Since this parasite lives only in man and the mosquito,

it can get from one person to another only through the agency of these

insects. In other words, a person once free from the malarial parasite

will remain free just so long as the bites of certain species of

mosquitoes can be avoided.” One acquires malaria in one way only, and

that is by being bitten by _Anopheles_ mosquitoes.

[Illustration:

Fig. II. Malaria and its Carrier. A, the malarial mosquito,

_Anopheles quadrimaculatus_. B, chart showing the seasonal prevalence

of malaria in the United States.

]

The tiger mosquito (_Aedes calopus_) is not native to the United

States, but has been introduced from the tropics. Today, however, it

is widely distributed in the Southern States, and has been found as

far north as New York. The eggs are laid singly or in small groups in

stagnant water, and hatch in from twelve hours to three or four days.

The larval life lasts about nine days, and the larvae are much more

active than the other mosquito wigglers. The tiger mosquito is not

often found in the country, but always near human dwellings, and it

prefers to deposit its eggs about houses, in vessels containing only a

little water--tubs, cisterns, rain barrels, old tin cans and the like.

The pupa state lasts only about two days, and the whole development

from egg to adult is sometimes passed in less than a fortnight. The

adult is considerably smaller than the other mosquitoes described here,

and is conspicuous for its white banded legs, and the prominent white

stripes on the thorax.

In 1881 a man named Carlos Finlay claimed that yellow fever was

transmitted by mosquitoes, but nobody paid any serious attention

to this novel theory, as everybody thought yellow fever was highly

contagious--carried about in the clothing like smallpox. In 1900 a

commission of United States army officers--Drs. Reed, Carroll, Lazear

and Agramonte--went to Cuba to make an experimental study of the

situation there. The procedure and results are concisely summarized by

Herrick:

Our insect enemies · 第 1 / 3 段