CHAPTER XXI

WOOD’S SECOND ADMINISTRATION

1856-1859

Under Wood’s second administration city affairs went from bad to worse.

The departments reeked with frauds. The city paid Robert W. Lowber

$196,000 for a lot officially declared to be worth only $60,000 and to

two-thirds of which, it was proved, Lowber had no title. Controller

Flagg charged that both the Mayor and the Common Council were parties

to it.[1] Fraudulent computations and illegitimate contracts were

covered by false entries.[2] Amounts on the ledger were revised so

as to steal considerable sums from the city outright.[3] To Bartlett

Smith had been awarded a contract for grading certain streets. Before

beginning work, however, the Legislature created Central Park out of

that very territory.[4] Smith demanded $80,000 from the city “for

trouble in arranging to do the grading”--a claim the Common Council

allowed, but Flagg refused to pay.

It was generally charged that Wood sold the office of Street

Commissioner to the notorious Charles Devlin[5] for $50,000 cash, with

certain reservations as to the patronage and profits. Devlin recouped

himself; for an investigation revealed that he spent half a million

dollars on contracts of which he was either the real contractor or

surety, and on which he made the prices 75 per cent higher than they

ought to have been.[6] Of how much the city was plundered it was

impossible to find out, since no reliable accounts of expenditures were

kept in the Finance Department.[7] Not a few officials, relinquishing

offices paying about $2,500 a year, retired loaded with riches and

surrounded by friends whom they had enriched. Wood himself was now

reputed to be worth $400,000.

Even the Judiciary was held in general contempt. The Lowber fraud (see

previous page) was promptly excused and the defendant exonerated by

the courts. In November, 1855, a City Judge was tried for corruption

in having entered a _nolle prosequi_ in a certain case. The verdict

was “not guilty,” with this remarkable addition: “And the jury are

unanimously of opinion that in the entry of the _nolle prosequi_ by

the City Judge he has been guilty of irregularity, and it is the

unanimous recommendation of the jury that Judge ---- resign.” He

resigned.[8] In December, 1855, during a trial for murder in the

Supreme Court, counsel for the defendant exclaimed: “I know the jury

have too much intelligence to pay any regard to the assumptions of

the Court.”[9] A man was killed at a prize fight. The Coroner, after

stating the evidence at the inquest, concluded: “If the persons

implicated are tried before our Court of Sessions they will have reason

to congratulate themselves, as it is a difficult matter in this city

to convict a person charged with any other crime than theft.”[10] In

January, 1856, the seat of one of the Judges of the Supreme Court was

contested by two candidates, both claiming to have been elected by

popular vote. Both asserted the right to sit; in opposition to the

opinions of the Judges sitting, one of the contestants took and kept

his seat by pure “nerve.”[11]

A new city charter, adopted in 1857, changed the date of municipal

elections to the first Tuesday in December, and provided for an

election for Mayor and Common Council in December, 1857. The change was

aimed partly at Wood. He had probably expected severe opposition of

some kind, for he had early begun planning for the continued control of

the Tammany General Committee, so as to secure a renomination.

In the primary elections, late in 1856, for delegates to this committee

for 1857, a majority favorable to Wood had been elected, after violence

and ballot-box stuffing in every ward. The Wood men took possession of

the Wigwam and elected Wilson Small chairman. The rival party met in

another place and organized a general committee. Each put forward the

claim of “regularity.”

As the “usages” of the party required that the “regular” committee

should have legal possession of Tammany Hall, it was necessary to

determine which that committee was. Then the Sachems stepped in. Seven

of them--a majority of one--were Wood’s personal enemies. By a vote

of seven to five the Sachems concluded to order the election of a new

general committee, which was to have all known Democrats enrolled into

associations.

“Tammany Society,” said the “seven Sachems’” report,

“is the undisputed owner of Tammany Hall; and the right to

control the use of that building which is inherent in its

ownership has been fully secured by the lease. The Council is

determined that their action shall vindicate fully the rights

and powers of the venerable society of which they are officers;

and also, prove a safe and efficient barrier against the tide

of corruption and fraud which is sapping the power of the great

party to which the society has adhered during the whole period

of its existence.”

At the society’s annual election, on May 20, the Isaac V. Fowler, or

“reform” ticket, had the names of some men of note--Samuel J. Tilden,

Elijah F. Purdy, Peter B. Sweeny, Edward Cooper, William H. Cornell,

John McKeon and Emanuel B. Hart--while Wood’s candidates were inferior

hack politicians and nonentities. The “seven Sachems” had previously

managed to get into the Wigwam unobserved by the Wood men, and had

rapidly elected nearly sixty new members, all their own partizans, to

the society.[12] These voted at the election, enabling Wood’s opponents

to beat him by a majority of sixty.[13] Then the “seven Sachems” turned

Wood and his men out of the Wigwam.

In a public address, the Wood men thereupon declared the society an

irresponsible body of less than four hundred members, one-third of

whom held no communication with the Democratic party, and that of

its thirteen Sachems seven were “Libby bolters.” “What, then, is

the issue?” asked the address. “Shall the Sachems rule the people;

or shall the people rule themselves? Shall the Sachems of this

close corporation, to procure offices for themselves and friends,

be permitted, unrebuked by the people, to exercise this omnipotent,

dictatorial, supervisory power over the great Democratic party, its

organization and interests, to rule out or rule in your general

committees whenever it suit their caprice or selfish purposes?”

The control of the police force was considered as necessary as ever

to success at the election. The changes of 1853, from which much

was hoped, had proved of little benefit. The force was in a chaotic

state. Political and pecuniary reasons alone guided the appointment

of policemen. No record of merit was kept; there was no systematic

instruction of policemen in their duties except as to drill. Some

Captains wore uniforms, others refused. When an applicant appointed to

the force was tested for qualifications in reading, a large newspaper

was given to him, and he was told to read the title. Murder abounded,

and the city was full of escaped convicts.[14] One of the most

important provisions of a special act of 1857 was the transfer of the

police from city control to that of the State. Unwilling to surrender

so effective a hold, Wood resisted the Legislature’s action. For a time

there were two police departments--the Metropolitan force, under the

State Commissioners, and the municipal police, under the Mayor--each

contending for supremacy. One day a part of the two forces came into

collision in the City Hall, and twelve men were wounded. It was found

necessary to summon the militia to quell the disturbances, and Wood was

arrested. Finding resistance useless, he submitted grudgingly to the

new order.[15]

The police being so disorganized, the criminal classes ran the town.

Chief among Wood’s supporters were the “Dead Rabbits” or “Black

Birds,”--a lawless “gang” who overawed certain portions of the city

and who had a rival in the “Bowery Boys,” whose sole profession seems

to have been to pack primaries, break ballot boxes and fight the “Dead

Rabbits.” On July 4, 1857, the “Dead Rabbits,” presumably having

nothing else to do, attacked a body of police in Jackson street. A band

of “Bowery Boys” hurried to the front, and a pitched street battle

ensued, pistols and muskets being procured from neighboring places.

Barricades were thrown up in the most approved Parisian style. The

result was the killing of ten and the wounding of eighty persons, some

of whom were innocent bystanders. This was the most deadly of the

numerous collisions of these “gangs.” As they had a powerful political

influence, the police did not molest them.[16]

As a member of the Metropolitan Police Commission, Mayor Wood about

this time was instrumental in giving out a contract for 4,000 glass

ballot boxes, at $15 apiece. It was disclosed in James Horner’s

affidavit before Judge Davis, in the Supreme Court, in November of this

year, that the city needed no more than 1,200 of the boxes; that Wood’s

brother had secured the 4,000 boxes at a cost of less than $5 apiece

and that the Mayor was to share in the $40,000 of expected profits.

Wood neglected no means of ingratiating himself with the masses. The

panic of 1857 suddenly deprived over 30,000 mechanics and laborers in

the city of employment. Wood proposed the employment of the idle on

public works, and the buying by the city of 50,000 barrels of flour

and an equal amount of other provisions to be disposed of to the

needy at cost.[17] The Common Council failed to see the value of this

plan, but did appropriate a sum for public works in Central Park, the

better share of which went to contractors and petty politicians. To

win the good will of the Roman Catholics, becoming more and more a

power, the Common Council gave over to the Roman Catholic Orphan Asylum

a perpetual lease of the entire plot from Fifth to Fourth avenue,

Fifty-first to Fifty-second street, at a rental of $1 a year.[18]

So resourceful was Wood and so remarkable his political ingenuity that

though he and his general committee were driven out by the Tammany

Society, he nevertheless brought things about so that the Democratic

convention in Tammany Hall, on October 15, renominated him for Mayor,

by 75 votes to 12. The Tammany General Committee thereupon openly

repudiated him, and the curious complication was presented of a

candidate who was the Tammany “regular” nominee, yet opposed by both

the society and the general committee.

Instantly a determined citizen’s movement to defeat him sprang up.

The city taxes had nearly doubled in the three years of Wood’s

administration and were now over $8,000,000, of which over $5,000,000

had already been signed away in contracts or spent in advance of

collection. Yet the Common Council had recently resolved to spend the

exorbitant sum of $5,000,000 on a new City Hall. The Mayor vetoed the

resolution only when the most intense public opposition was manifested.

A committee of citizens, representative of the Republicans, Democrats

and Native Americans, nominated Daniel F. Tiemann, a paint dealer, and

a member of Tammany Hall, but who was an Alderman and as Governor of

the Almshouse had made a good record.

To Wood’s support there concentrated the preponderance of the foreign

born, the native rowdies and the usual mass blinded into voting for

the “regular” ticket. The gamblers, brothel-keepers, immigrant runners

and swindlers of every kind bought and cheated for him in the belief

that the reformers would drive them from the city. Wood had taken

the precaution to manufacture thousands of voters. From the Wigwam,

where the Wood partizans backed up their right to meet with fists,

drummers-up were sent to bring in prospective citizens. Upon promising

faithfully to vote the Tammany ticket, a card, valued at fifty cents,

was furnished gratuitously to each. It was addressed to a Judge who

owed his election to Tammany, and read:

“Common Pleas:

“Please naturalize the bearer.

“N. Seagrist, chairman.”[19]

From 3,000 to 4,000 voters, it was estimated, were turned out by this

process.

The sentiment of certain politicians may be taken from John

Cochrane’s[20] remark that “he would vote for the devil incarnate if

nominated by Tammany Hall.” Meanwhile they took care to make out Wood

to be a much-abused man. At the ratification meeting in Tammany Hall,

on November 23, long resolutions were passed, fulsomely flattering Wood

and asking voters to remember that if Wood was assailed, so Jefferson,

Jackson and Daniel Webster were pursued to their graves by harpies. The

voters were asked not to be deceived by the abuse of the graceless,

godless characters and disappointed demagogues.

Wood and his partizans strained every nerve for success. But it was a

futile effort. The opposition won, Tiemann receiving 43,216 votes, to

40,889 for Wood. His large vote, however, showed the dangerous strength

of the worst classes of the city, and boded ill for the years to come.

The opposition of the Tammany Society and the general committee having

been responsible for his defeat, Wood made renewed efforts to regain

sway over both. On their part, elated at his supposed downfall, the

Anti-Wood members of the general committee decided to expel Daniel E.

Sickles and C. Godfrey Gunther, two of his supporters, and met for that

purpose in the Wigwam on December 9, 1857.

Wood’s followers thought proper to impress upon the general committee a

sense of their strength. Accordingly, their fighting men were present

in full force, awaiting an opportunity to mingle in the proceedings.

The probability of a violent row increasing momentarily, the

Metropolitan police were summoned to Tammany Hall. For a time they kept

the hostiles within bounds; but the bar was well patronized, and large

delegations of the “Dead Rabbits” and “shoulder-hitters” from the wards

were flowing in constantly.

At 9 o’clock a desperate fight was begun in the center of the bar-room,

amid intense excitement. By using their clubs unsparingly, the forty

policemen succeeded in separating the combatants, though not before a

young man, Cornelius Woods, had been shot in the shoulder with a slug.

Unwilling to draw upon themselves the resentment of the influential

ward politicians, the police made no arrests. The meeting broke up

without definite action being taken in the matter of expelling the two

supporters of Wood.

The first and chief point in the struggle for the control of the

organization was, as usual, the control of the Tammany Society. Both

factions were alive to this necessity. On April 13, 1858, 150 members

of the society met at the Westchester House, Bowery and Broome streets,

where it was announced that 212 members were pledged to vote for

Anti-Wood Sachems. Some of these members were seeking the ascendency

for their own benefit, while others were not active in politics at all,

but had become disgusted with Wood’s methods and men. At the election,

six days later, the Anti-Wood ticket, headed by Isaac V. Fowler and

Nelson J. Waterbury, won by a majority of nearly 100, 378 members

voting. More than twenty members who had not been at an election of the

society for twenty years or more, and a large number who had eschewed

voting for ten years, hastened, some from distances, to deposit

their votes. Three came from Hudson, a number from Albany, two from

Washington, and one from Cincinnati.

The result was Wood’s forced withdrawal from the organization. He

immediately started a Democratic organization opposed to Tammany and

upon the same lines. It was known generally as “Mozart Hall,” from the

name of the assembly room in which it met. Wood denounced Tammany,

declaring that its nominees were chosen by five members of the Tammany

Society, in a parlor, and ferociously expressed his determination to

wage war upon the society as long as he lived until (this reservation

was added) “it opened its doors.”

Each hall, as a matter of political business, made the most virtuous

and the strongest claims of being the true Democratic organization.

Each execrated the other and announced itself as the sole, valiant,

sincere upholder of Democracy.

Wood’s enemies made haste to guarantee their ascendency when, on

December 28, the Sachems ordered elections for the committees to be

held on December 30, thus giving but _one day’s_ notice of the event.

Moreover, they forced upon all persons accepting membership in the

committees, a pledge that in case of their election they would support

the Tammany organization and all nominations made under its authority,

and disclaim allegiance to any other organization, party or clique.

The election of delegates to the various nominating conventions, in the

Fall of 1858, was attended by the customary disorder. Wood’s partizans

were everywhere inciting trouble. At O’Connell’s Hall, on Mulberry

street, a crowd, seeing that the result was unfavorable to their side,

split the ballot boxes and threw them into the street. The “Dead

Rabbits,” scenting trouble, appeared hastily, and a fight ensued on

Hester street, in which two of them were shot.

This municipal election was the first in which the Democratic voters

of Irish nativity or lineage insisted on a full share of the best

places on the party’s ticket. Previously they had seldom been allowed

any local office above Coroner. Their dominance on the Tammany ticket

again roused the “Know-Nothing” sentiment, and a combination of Native

Americans, Republicans and independents resulted. The combination

secured 16 of the 24 Councilmen.

The politicians were now confronted with a registry act, which omitted

the blunder of that of 1840 in applying only to New York City. This

measure became a law in 1859, despite the stubborn opposition of

Tammany, some of whose leaders, Isaac V. Fowler and others, issued an

address asking Democrats to arise and defeat it. Failing to defeat it,

they resolved to circumvent it by means of the Board of Supervisors,

which was required to appoint the registry clerks. This body was by

law divided equally as to politics, the Legislature calculating that

this would insure fair dealing. But by the purchase of the vote of one

of the Republican Supervisors for $2,500,[21] the Tammany members

were enabled not only to redistrict the city to their own advantage,

but to appoint trusted tools as registrars. For appearances’ sake

they allowed a Republican registry clerk here and there. Of 609

registrars appointed, the Republicans secured about 75; and of the

whole 609, 68 were liquor-sellers, 92 were petty office-holders, 34

were supposed gamblers, and 50 of the names were not in the city

directory. The Tammany leaders held daily private caucuses, and made

a list of henchmen with extreme care, in order to exclude Wood from

any influence with the registry clerks. William M. Tweed, a member of

the board, generally named the men, and Elijah F. Purdy boasted that

Tammany demanded the appointment of none but Democrats, and that they

(the Tammany Supervisors) meant to sustain their party at any and all

hazards. Having the registry clerks, Tammany Hall could revel in false

registry and repeating. Good citizens, dejected at the outlook, were

sure of a repetition of the frauds of former years.

Seeking to satisfy all parties, Mayor Tiemann failed to satisfy any.

He was accused of using the official patronage for the advantage of

Tammany Hall, in the hope of getting a renomination from it in 1859. He

and his chief office-holders appointed to the office the most notorious

fighting men and ruffians in the city. The Tammany leaders did not

favor him, possibly because they thought William F. Havemeyer a man of

more weight, popularity and respectability.

Accordingly they nominated the latter. Wood had himself nominated by

Mozart Hall, and the Republicans chose George P. Opdyke, a millionaire.

In this triangular contest the Tammany men felt that the force of

Havemeyer’s good record would put them in power. Singularly, however,

with all its manipulation of the registry lists, and the excellent

character of its nominee, Tammany lost. The Irish voters sided almost

solidly with Wood, and the lowest classes of the city, fearing the

election of a man so distasteful to them as Havemeyer or Opdyke, used

all their effectiveness for Wood, who received 29,940 votes, against

26,913 for Havemeyer, and 21,417 for Opdyke.

It was conceded that much of the worst part of Tammany’s strength had

gone over to Wood. This fact was suggestive, to a degree, of Wood’s

assurance, considering the declaration in his letter of acceptance of

the nomination that he favored “excluding the bullies and rowdies from

public employment and of dealing summarily with that class of outlaws.”

Although Tammany had nominated a good man, for the sake of sliding into

power upon the strength of his reputation, its lesser candidates were

generally incompetent or of bad character; half a dozen of its nominees

for Councilmen were under indictment for various crimes.

FOOTNOTES

[1] _Documents of the Board of Aldermen_, 1859, No. 16. The courts

decided later in favor of Lowber. As Controller Flagg refused to

pay the claim on the ground of no funds being “applicable,” Lowber

caused the Sheriff to sell at auction, in October, 1858, the City Hall

with its equipment and paintings to satisfy a judgment of $228,000,

including damages, costs and interest. Mayor Tiemann bid the City

Hall in for the sum of $50,000, and turned it over to the city when

reimbursed. _Documents of the Board of Aldermen_, 1859, Vol. XXVI, No.

1.

[2] _Ibid._, Vol. XXIII, No. 42; also _Ibid._, Vol. XXV, No. 10.

[3] _Ibid._

[4] The Act was passed July 21, 1853. This was one of the very few

public-spirited measures of the time. Tammany, however, immediately

began to utilize the measure, through contracts for the clearing and

improvement of the park, to the profit of its leaders and followers.

[5] Devlin was appointed by Mayor Wood to succeed Joseph S. Taylor,

deceased. At the same time Daniel D. Conover was selected for the post

by the Governor, who claimed the right of appointment. The Mayor used

inflammatory language, a turbulent mob gathered, and the militia had

to be ordered out to prevent serious violence between the partizans of

each. (_Assembly Documents_, 1858, No. 80.) The courts later decided in

favor of Devlin.

[6] Devlin was removed from office by Mayor Tiemann in April, 1858.

[7] _Report of Special Common Council Committee_, October 22, 1857.

[8] _Harper’s New Monthly Magazine_, November, 1856.

[9] _Ibid._

[10] _Ibid._

[11] _Ibid._

[12] Statement to the author by Douglas Taylor, one of the “seven

Sachems.”

[13] Of this action Talcott Williams (_Tammany Hall_, G. P. Putnam’s

Sons, 1898) says: “For the first time, the Tammany Society, which

is only the landlord of the political body which leases its hall,

exercised its singular power of deciding between rival organizations.”

This, of course, is a decided error. Repeated instances of the activity

of the society in this direction have been given in this work.

[14] _Assembly Documents_, 1857, II, part 2, No. 127.

[15] _Assembly Documents,_ 1858, No. 80. The chaos produced during this

dispute was extreme. Members of one force would seize and liberate

prisoners taken by the other force, combats were frequent, and

peaceable citizens were often unable to secure protection.

[16] This riot is briefly treated in Document No. 80.

[17] _Proceedings of the Board of Aldermen_, Vol. LXVII, pp. 157-60.

[18] _Ibid._, Vol. LXVIII, p. 140.

[19] This reference to Seagrist was handed down in an Aldermanic

committee’s report some years before: “… Thomas Munday, Nicholas

Seagrist, Captain Norris, Mackellar and others were charged with

_robbing the funeral pall of Henry Clay_, when his sacred person passed

through this city.” _Documents of the Board of Aldermen_, Vol. XXII:

No. 43.

[20] Cochrane later followed Wood into Mozart Hall, but subsequently

returned to Tammany Hall. He was elected to Congress, serving one term.

He raised a regiment at the outbreak of the Civil War, and in June,

1862, was made a Brigadier-General. He was elected Attorney-General

of the State in 1863. In 1872 he joined the Greeley movement. He held

various local offices, both in 1872 and in 1883 being elected to the

Presidency of the Board of Aldermen. As late as 1889 he was a Sachem.

He died in 1898, in his 85th year.

[21] Statement of William M. Tweed before a special investigating

committee of the Board of Aldermen, 1877 (_Document No. 8_, _Documents

of the Board of Aldermen,_ Vol. II, pp. 15-16). Isaac V. Fowler, Tweed

testified, furnished the $2,500 which was paid to Peter R. Voorhis, a

Republican member. Tweed further stated, that besides himself there

were in the conspiracy Elijah F. Purdy, William C. Conner, Isaac Bell,

Jr. (a Sachem) and John R. Briggs.

The History of Tammany Hall Second Edition · 第 21 / 37 章