Jacopo possessed few disciples beyond his two children, though he

profited in some measure from these few. Paolo Franceschi, or de'

Freschi, a Fleming, and Martino de Vos d'Anversa, were artists he

employed to draw his landscapes. The former was esteemed one of the best

landscape painters of his time, while he succeeded also in figures. He

was engaged to paint for the Palazzo Publico, and several churches in

Venice, where he terminated his days. The second resided also at Rome;

and, in the church of San Francesco a Ripa, painted his _Concezione_, a

picture, indeed, abounding with too many figures, but beautiful and

exquisite in its tints. With still greater felicity he depicted the four

seasons for the Colonna family, very pleasing little pictures,

presenting a happy union of various schools, fine perspective, fine

relief, with correct and graceful design. Passing into Germany, and

increasing in reputation no less by his works than by the engravings

made of them by Sadeler, there, full of years and fame, he died.

Lamberto Lombardo has been just before recorded as the assistant of

Tintoretto, but not his disciple.

Odofardo Fialetti, a native of Bologna, was educated in the school of

Tintoretto, where he acquired a reputation for good design, and a

thorough acquaintance with all the precepts of the art, yet he was still

far from emulating his master, not possessing vivacity of genius equal

to the task. To avoid a competition with the Caracci he long continued,

and died at Venice, where many of his works are highly esteemed, and in

particular his picture of the Crucifixion, painted for the Croce.

Among the imitators of Tintoretto appears the name of Cesare dalle

Ninfe, an artist who aimed at reaching the sharp expression of ridicule,

the novelty of ideas, and the rapidity of hand, so remarkable in his

prototype; though unequal in his design. Flaminio Floriano seems to have

been ambitious of imitating only the more correct parts of his model; so

uniformly exact, temperate, and precise does he appear in his picture of

San Lorenzo, to which he affixed his name.

The name of Melchior Colonna also occurs, though hardly known in Venice,

and some perhaps would add that of Bertoli, a Venetian, to be met with

affixed to a picture at the chapel of San Niccola, in Tolentino. It

represents the Plague that visited that city, if I mistake not, and

which disappeared at the solicitation of the patron saint. There is also

an account of another artist, who from his age might have received the

instructions of Tintoretto, or at all events obtained them from his

works; his name was Gio. Rothenamer di Monaco. Arriving in Italy with

but a small fund of knowledge, acquired in the studio of a poor national

artist, he distinguished himself at Rome, and perfected his style in

Venice, adopting in a great measure the maxims of Tintoretto. There, at

the Incurabili, he left a Santa Cristina, a Nunziata at San Bartolommeo,

and, as we have reason to believe, other works in private possession, by

which he obtained some degree of credit. Subsequently arriving at a

handsome practice in England, he nevertheless contrived to die there in

poverty, his funeral expenses being defrayed by the alms of some

Venetians. But few others, observes Zanetti, pursued the same path,

probably because at that period more pleasing and popular styles were in

vogue. Ridolfi, on the other hand, asserts, that all young artists

towards the end of the century were anxious to study him for their

model; and we shall find, in treating of the _mannerists_, that he was

acknowledged by them as their sovereign master. We must, in the next

place, enter upon a consideration of the school of Bassano.

Jacopo da Ponte, son to that Francesco, who, in the preceding epoch, was

commended as one of the better artists who flourished during the

fourteenth century, was nearly contemporary with Tintoretto, and was

instructed by his father in the art. His earliest efforts, that are seen

in the church of San Bernardino, in his native place, bear the impress

of such an education. On resorting to Venice he was recommended to

Bonifazio, a master no less jealous of his art than Titian or

Tintoretto; insomuch that Jacopo never obtained the advantage of seeing

him colour, except by secretly watching him through a crevice in the

door of his studio. He resided but a little time in Venice, employed in

designing the cartoons of Parmigianino, and in taking copies of the

pictures of Bonifazio and Titian, whose scholar, upon the authority of

some manuscript, he had also been. And, if conformity of manner were

sufficient evidence, by no means always a certain guide, we might admit

the truth of such supposition; his second style being altogether that of

Titian. A few of his pictures are met with in his native place, such as

his Flight into Egypt, at San Girolamo, and a Nativity of the Redeemer,

in possession of Sig. Dottor Larber, both youthful productions, but

which seemed to promise another Titian; so richly were they imbued with

his sweetness of taste.

Upon his father's death Jacopo was compelled to return, and settle in

his own province, whose city is at this day both rich and populous, and

in those times it was esteemed by no means despicable; its situation

delightful, abounding with flocks and herds, and well adapted for the

sale of merchandize, and for fairs. From these elements arose by degrees

his formation of a third style, full of simplicity and grace, and which

gave the first indications in Italy of a taste altogether foreign; that

of the Flemish. In the use of his pencil, Jacopo may be said to have

pursued two different methods. The first of these is much softened with

a fine union of tints, and at last determined with free strokes. The

second, resulting in a great measure from the other, was formed by

simple strokes of the pencil, with clear and pleasing tints, and with a

certain command, or rather audacity of art, that, nearly viewed, appears

a confused mixture, but forms in the distance an enchanting effect of

colouring. In both of these he displays the originality of his own

style, chiefly consisting in a certain soft and luscious composition. It

partakes at once of the triangular and the circular form, and aims at

certain contrast of postures; so that if one of the figures is in full

face, the other turns its shoulders; and at the same time at a kind of

analogy, so that a number of heads shall meet in the same line, or in a

want of these, some other form elevated in the same direction. In regard

to his lights, he appears partial to such as are confined to one part,

and displayed masterly power in rendering it subservient to the harmony

of the whole; for with these rare lights, with the frequent use of

middle tints, and the absence of deep obscure, he succeeded admirably in

harmonizing the most opposite colours. In the gradation of lights he

often contrives that the shadow of the interior figure shall serve as a

ground for one more forward; and that the figures should partake of few

lights, but extremely bold and vivid at their angles; as for instance,

on the top of the shoulder, on the knee, and on the elbow; for which

purpose he makes use of a flow or sweep of folds, natural to all

appearance, but in fact highly artificial, to favour his peculiar

system. In proportion to the variety of his draperies, he varies the

folds with a delicacy of judgment that falls to the share of few. His

colours every where shine like gems; in particular his greens, which

display an emerald tinge peculiar to himself. Whoever would become more

familiar with the mechanism, and at the same time peruse a very full

analysis, of Bassano's style, may refer to Sig. Verci, the able

historian of the Marca Trevigiana, who drew it up from the _MS.

Volpati_, cited by us in another epoch, and in the index to the writers.

At the outset Jacopo aspired to a grandeur of style, which is apparent

from some of his pictures remaining in the facade of the Casa Michieli.

Among these, a Samson slaying the Philistines meets with much praise,

and indeed they all partake of the boldness of Michel Angiolo. But,

whether the result of disposition or of judgment, he afterwards confined

himself to smaller proportions, and to subjects of less power. Even the

figures in his altarpieces are generally less than life, and so little

animated, that it was observed by some one, that in Tintoretto even his

old men were spirited, but that the youths of Bassano were mere dotards.

We do not meet with any of that noble architecture in his paintings,

that adds so much dignity to those of the Venetian School. He appears

rather anxious to find subjects in which to introduce candlelight,

cottages, landscape, animals, copper vessels, and all such objects as

passed under his eye, and which he copied with surprising accuracy. His

ideas were limited, and he often repeated them, a fault to be attributed

to his situation, it being an indisputable fact, that the conceptions

both of artists and of writers become enlarged and increased in great

capitals, and diminish in small places. All this may be gathered from

his pictures produced for private ornament, the most familiar occupation

of his life, inasmuch as he executed very few large altarpieces. He

conducted them at leisure in his studio, and, assisted by his school, he

prepared a great number of various dimensions. He then despatched them

to Venice, and sometimes to the best frequented fairs, thus rendering

the number so very great, as to make it rather a disgrace for a

collection not to possess copies by his hand, than an honour to have

them. In these may be viewed, almost invariably, the same subjects;

consisting of acts of the Old and New Testament; the Feasts of Martha,

of the Pharisee, of the Glutton, with a splendid display of brazen

vessels; the Ark of Noah, the Return of Jacob, the Annunciation of the

Angel to the Shepherds, with great variety of animals. To these we may

add, the Queen of Sheba; the three Magi, with regal pomp of dress, and

the richest array; the Deposition of our Lord from the Cross, by

torchlight. His pieces upon profane subjects exhibit the sale of beasts

and of brazen vessels; sometimes rural occupations, corresponding to the

seasons of the year; and sometimes without human figures, merely a

kitchen, furniture, a fowl yard, or similar objects. Nor is it only the

histories or the compositions themselves that recur in every collection

to the eye; but even countenances taken from individuals of his own

family; for instance, arraying his own daughter either as a Queen of

Sheba, or a Magdalen; or as a villager, presenting fowls to the infant

Jesus. I have likewise seen entire pieces, with the title of the _Family

of Bassano_, sometimes in small size, and sometimes in larger. Of the

former, I remarked a specimen in Genoa, in possession of Signor Ambrogio

Durazzo, where the daughters of the painter are seen intent upon their

feminine occupations, a little boy playing, and a domestic in the act of

lighting a candle. One of the second kind may be seen in the _Medicean

Museum_, a picture which represents an academy of music.

By this method he seemed to confess the poverty of his imagination,

though he derived from it a very remarkable advantage. By dint of

continually repeating the same things, he brought them to the utmost

point of perfection of which they were susceptible; as we may gather

from his picture of the Nativity of our Lord, placed at San Giuseppe, in

Bassano; the master not only of Jacopo, but in point of force of colours

and the chiaroscuro, of every thing that modern painting has to boast.

The same is seen in his Burial of Christ, at the Seminario of Padua, a

picture of which an engraving was taken by order of Madame Patin, among

the portraits of celebrated painters; having met with no other that

seemed to breathe such a spirit of pity and holy terror. Finally, in his

Sacrifice of Noah, at Santa Maria Maggiore in Venice, in which he

collected specimens of all the birds and animals he had drawn elsewhere,

he preserved the same character; and by this production so far won the

regard of Titian, that he wished to purchase a copy for the ornament of

his own studio.

Hence it happens, that the works of Bassano, conducted at a certain age

and with singular care, are estimated very highly, and purchased at

large sums, though not altogether exempt from some errors of

perspective, from some awkwardness of posture, and some fault in

composition, particularly in point of symmetry. Indeed it was the

general belief, that he possessed little practical skill in designing

the extremities, thus avoiding, as much as lay in his power, the

introduction of feet and hands into his pictures. These accusations,

with others before alluded to, might be greatly extenuated by producing

such examples of Bassano as would fully prove, that he could, when he

pleased, draw much better than he was accustomed to do. He knew how to

vary his compositions, as we perceive in his Nativity, at the Ambrosiana

in Milan; and he might as easily have varied his other pieces. He was

capable also of conceiving with equal novelty and propriety, as we

gather from his San Rocco, at Vicenza; and he might thus have shone on

other occasions. Moreover, he knew how to draw the extremities, as

appears from his picture of S. Peter, at Venice, adorning the church of

the Umilta; and he could give dignity to his countenances, as in his

Queen of Sheba, which I have seen in Brescia; and he might have

displayed the same dignity in other pieces. But whether he found such a

task too irksome, or from whatever other cause, he displayed his powers

rarely; content with having arrived at his peculiar method of colouring,

of illuminating, and of shading, with a sovereign skill. So universally

was he admired, that he received innumerable commissions from various

courts, and an invitation to that of Vienna. What is more honourable,

notwithstanding his defects, he extorted the highest praises, if not

from Vasari, from many of the most renowned artists; from Titian, from

Annibal Caracci, who was so much deceived by a book painted upon a

table, that he stretched out his hand to take it up; and from

Tintoretto, who commended his colouring, and in some measure wished to

imitate him. Above all, he was highly honoured by Paul Veronese, who

entrusted him with his son Carletto, for a pupil, to receive his general

instructions, "and more particularly in regard to that just disposition

of lights reflected from one object to another, and in those happy

counterpositions, owing to which the depicted objects seem clothed with

a profusion of light." Such is the flattering testimony given by

Algarotti to the style of Jacopo da Ponte.

Bassano educated four of his sons to the same profession, which thus

became transmitted to others, so that the Bassanese school continued for

the length of a century, though still declining and departing fast from

its primitive splendour. Francesco and Leandro were the two members of

Jacopo's family best disposed to pursue his footsteps, and he was

accustomed to pride himself upon the inventive talents displayed by the

former, and the singular ability of the latter for portrait painting, Of

his two other sons, Giambatista and Girolamo, he used to observe, that

they were the most accurate copyists of his own works. All of these,

more especially the two latter, were instructed by their father in those

refinements of the art he himself practised, and they so far succeeded,

that many of their copies, made both during and after the lifetime of

their father, very frequently imposed upon professors, being received

for the originals of Jacopo. The whole of them, however, produced

original works, and Francesco the eldest, having established himself in

Venice, gave ample proof of it in those histories drawn from Venetian

records, which he painted for the Palazzo Grande. They are placed near

those of Paul Veronese, and appear to advantage even in such

competition. His father here assisted him with his advice; himself

attending upon the spot, and instructing him where he found occasion,

how to add force to his tints, to improve his perspective, and to bring

the whole work to the most perfect degree of art. His pencil may be very

clearly traced in that of his son, as well as his style, which in the

opinion of critics is somewhat too much loaded, especially in his

shades. Francesco, likewise, produced several beautiful altarpieces, in

which, on the other hand, he appears less vigorous than his father; as

may be seen in his Paradiso, at the Gesu, in Rome, or in his San

Apollonio, at Brescia, one of the most beautiful pieces in the church of

S. Afra, and much admired by foreigners. And he would have achieved

still greater things, had he not been afflicted with severe fits of

melancholy, such as to deprive him of the use of his faculties and his

time, until he was driven by sudden desperation to throw himself from a

window, and, by this accident, still in the prime of his days, he lost

his life.

The works which he left imperfect in the Ducal Palace, and in other

places, were completed by Leandro, the third son of Jacopo, and a

professor in high repute. He followed the same maxims in the art, except

that by his practice in portrait taking, he acquired more originality of

countenance; and in the use of his pencil approaches nearer to the first

than to the second style of Jacopo. He is, moreover, more variable in

it, and inclines somewhat to the mannerism of his age. One of his best

performances perhaps, is to be seen at San Francesco, in Bassano; Santa

Caterina crowned by our Lord; amidst various saints, distributed upon

the steps of the throne, with figures larger than customary in the

Bassanese school. His pictures likewise of the Resurrection of Lazarus,

placed at the Carita; and of the Nativity of the Virgin, at Santa Sofia;

besides others he produced at Venice, as well as for the state, are

distinguished by their large proportions. If familiar with the father's

productions, we may often detect domestic plagiarisms in Leandro; who

often repeats the family of da Ponte, copied in innumerable pieces by

Jacopo, by his sons, and by their descendants. Even in his pictures for

private ornament, conducted according to his own style and fancy, he was

fond of adopting paternal subjects and examples; being skilful in

drawing animals of every kind from nature. But nothing proved so

favourable to his reputation, both in Italy and throughout Europe, as

the immense number of his portraits, admirably executed, and not

unfrequently with a certain original fancy, both for private persons and

for princes. Those that he executed for the Imperial Palace were

particularly relished; insomuch that he received an invitation from

Rodolph II., to accept the place of his court painter; an honour which

Leandro thought fit to refuse. He was more ambitious of enjoying fame at

Venice than at Vienna; for the Doge Grimani, the better to obtain a

noble portrait of himself, had already created him his cavalier. And

Leandro supported his dignity with an imposing demeanour: he lodged,

dressed, and maintained his table in a noble manner. He appeared in

public ornamented with a collar of gold, and with the insignia of St.

Mark, accompanied by a train of disciples, who dwelt at his house. One

of these bore his gold cane, another the repertory, in which he noted

down all that was to be done during the day. The same were bound to

attend upon him at table; and as he was suspicious of poison, he was

accustomed, like the great, to have his tasters, who took something of

every dish he eat; but they were ordered not to taste much, as in such

case the great man became little, and gave rise to much mirth. Like his

brother, he was subject to fits of melancholy, but he contrived to

manage them so well, as only to give birth to comic, never to tragic

scenes.

Giambatista da Ponte, is a name almost unmentioned in history; nor is

there any production attributed to him, besides an altarpiece in Gallio,

with his name, and which by some writer has been given, from its style,

to Leandro. Girolamo, the last of the family, is better known by an

altarpiece which he conducted in Venice, after the composition of

Leandro, as well as for others executed in Bassano and its vicinity. He

cannot be denied a certain graceful air in his countenances; and in some

of his works, displaying the simplest composition, very graceful

colouring. Such is his picture of S. Barbara, adorning the church of S.

Giovanni, at Bassano, where the saint is seen between two upright virgin

figures, with their eyes fixed upon heaven, where the holy virgin is

represented in the usual manner of the times.

Not only was Jacopo attached to the soil and very walls of his native

country, from which no prospects of honour or of profit could tempt him

away; but he liberally granted his instructions to his fellow citizens,

which both his sons and their family continued after his decease. The

best disciple whom they produced, was Jacopo Apollonio, the offspring of

Jacopo's daughter. Though only acquainted with the two least celebrated

of his uncles, he made rapid progress in his art, a case in which he may

be compared to certain writers, who have wholly made use of their native

dialect, without mingling it with any of a foreign growth. In like

manner he is _Bassanese_ in his ideas, in his draperies, in his

architecture, and more than all, in his landscape, which he touched with

a master's hand. He might easily at times be mistaken for the real

Bassani, were he not inferior to them in the vigour of his tints, in the

delicacy of his contours, and in the strokes of his pencil. Some of his

best works consist of a Magdalen, seen in the Dome of Bassano, a San

Francesco at the Riformati, which present fair examples by which to

judge of his style. Yet above all, his picture of the Titular with

various other saints at San Sebastiano, is one of the most exquisite

finish, and possesses every estimable quality in the art, except that of

softness. Some have considered him the only artist among the disciples

of this school worthy of commemoration. Yet the natives of Bassano set

some store by two brothers named Giulio and Luca Martinelli, very

estimable scholars of Jacopo. They also hold in some esteem Antonio

Scaiario, son-in-law to Giambatista da Ponte, as well as his heir, owing

to which he sometimes signs himself _Antonio da Ponte, Antonio Bassano_.

Nor do they omit the name of Jacopo Guadagnini, the offspring of a

daughter of Francesco da Ponte, who acquired some merit in face

painting, and in copying, however feebly, the works of his ancestors.

Upon his decease in 1633, every vestige of the manner and of the school

of Jacopo became extinct in Bassano. There nevertheless arose about the

same period in Cittadella, a place adjacent to Bassano, a young genius

of the name of Gio. Batista Zampezzo, who, directed by Apollonio, and

having concluded his studies at Venice, devoted himself to copying the

works of Jacopo. So well did he imitate his Santa Lucilla baptized by

San Valentino, a piece at the Grazie in Bassano, that Bartolommeo

Scaligero pronounced it comparable with the original. He flourished

about 1660;[66] and subsequent to him appeared the noble Gio. Antonio

Lazzari, a Venetian, who succeeded in deceiving the most skilful

artists, says Melchiori, by dint of copying Jacopo, and passing for him.

It will not have been irksome, I trust, to my readers, thus to have

connected together a series of the school of Bassano, by aid of which

the copies taken by so many artists, at different periods, and with

various degrees of merit, may be better distinguished.[67]

The History of Painting in Italy, Vol. 3 (of 6) From the Period of the Revival of the Fine Arts to the End of the Eighteenth Century · 第 12 / 24 段