III

OUR COUNTRY, OUR HOMES AND OUR DUTY. A PLEA FOR THE HOME AGAINST THE

SALOON.

The sweetest word in the language we speak is home. No matter in what

clime or country, whether where sunbeams dance and play or frost fiend

rules the air, there's no place like home. At the World's Fair in

Chicago I visited the Eskimo village. To a woman who could speak

English I said: "How do you like this country?"

"Beautiful, beautiful country. Oh, the flowers, the green grass, the

lovely homes!" was her reply.

But when I ventured to ask: "Will you remain here after the fair and

not return to your land of ice and snow," she shook her head and said:

"No, I want to go home. I am so homesick."

"Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home." In Lexington,

Kentucky, there is a modest looking house, nestled mid linden and

locust trees. Visitors who pass in quest of historic spots about the

far-famed city, seldom give even a glance at that humble abode. Yet

when I am far away, whether in the wonderful west with its scenic

grandeur, or in the east surrounded by mansions of millionaires, my

heart goes back in memory's aeroplane to the old Blue Grass town,

where six generations of my family sleep, the dearest spot on earth to

me--"home, sweet home." When years ago I was nearing the end of a

three months' lecture tour in California, a friend invited me to join

him on a visit to Yosemite Valley, saying: "You will see the grandest

scenery and biggest trees in the world." My reply was: "I thank you

very much, but my engagements in the golden west close on the eighth

and I will start east on the ninth; my old Kentucky home is grander to

me than Yosemite Valley and my baby bigger than any tree in

California."

Someone has said the nearest spot to heaven in this world is a happy

home, where the parents are young and the children small. I don't know

about that. It seems to me a little nearer heaven is the home where

husband and wife have lived long together, where children honor

parents and parents honor God; where the aged wife can look her

husband in the face and give him the sentiment of the dame of John

Anderson:

"John Anderson, my jo John,

When we were first acquent;

Your locks were like the raven,

Your bonnie brow was brent;

But now your brow is beld, John,

Your locks are like the snaw;

But blessings on your frosty pow,

John Anderson, my jo.

"John Anderson, my jo, John,

We clamb the hill thegither;

And mony a cantie day, John,

We've had wi' one anither:

Now we maun totter down, John,

And hand in hand we'll go,

And sleep thegither at the foot,

John Anderson, my jo."

James A. Garfield said: "It's by the fireside, where calm thoughts

inspired by love of home and love of country, the history of the past,

the hope of the future, God works out the destiny of this republic."

A Spartan general pointing to his army said: "There stand the walls of

Sparta and every man's a brick." Can I not point to the homes of our

country and say: "There stand the walls of this republic and every

home's a brick." Suppose a battery, planted on some eminence outside

this city, were to send a shell through some building every hour; how

long until your beautiful city would be one of crumbling walls and

flying population? On yonder heights of law are planted two hundred

thousand rum batteries, sending shells of destruction through the

homes of the people and every day hundreds of homes are knocked out of

the walls of the republic.

Do you realize what it means when an American home is destroyed by

drink? Some years ago on Sunday afternoon I visited an eastern

penitentiary by invitation of the chaplain. Passing a row of cells my

attention was called to a man whose face bore the marks of

intelligence and refinement. The chaplain said: "That man is an ideal

prisoner and a born gentleman, though here for life. He is the

graduate of an eastern college. He married an accomplished young

woman. In social life he was led into the drink habit, and it grew

upon him until at times he became intoxicated. When under the

influence of liquor his reason was dethroned, and one night in a brawl

he killed a man. He was given a life sentence. Asking permission to

speak he said: 'I have no complaint to make of the verdict, but beg

the privilege of saying, God who knows the secrets of all hearts,

knows I am not a murderer at heart, for I don't know how nor when I

killed my friend.' A few days after he entered this prison his wife

came to visit him. She had with her a sweet little golden-haired

child. As he entered the office in his striped prison garb his wife

fell into his arms; the agony on that man's face I can never forget.

The child shrank from him at first, then recognizing her father, she

ran to him. As he hugged her to his bosom the little one twined her

arms about his neck and said: 'Papa, please come home with us. Mama

cries so much cause you don't come home.' The man sinking into a chair

said: 'O God, am I never to see my home again?'"

This is but one of the thousands of homes destroyed every year by the

drink curse. If I could draw aside the veil and let you look into the

desolate homes of your own city tonight, you would feel Ex-Governor

Hanley of Indiana did not give an overwrought picture when he said:

"Personally, I have seen so much physical ruin, mental blight and

moral corruption from strong drink that I hate the traffic. I hate it

for its arrogance; I hate it for its hypocrisy; I hate it for its

greed and avarice; I hate it for its domination in politics; I hate it

for its disregard of law; I hate it for the load it straps on labor's

back; I hate it for the wounds it has given to genius, for the human

wrecks it has wrought, for the alms-houses it has peopled, for the

prisons it has filled, for the crimes it has committed, the homes it

has destroyed, the hearts it has broken, the malice it has planted in

the hearts of men, and the dead sea fruit with which it starves

immortal souls." With proof of the truth of this phillipic on every

hand, it is a strange anomaly in our government that the degrading

influence of the saloon is linked by law to the elevating influence of

school, church and home.

When Jesus was on earth He came to a fig tree, dressed in rich leaves

but barren of fruit; it was in fig season but the tree had only

leaves. We read that Jesus cursed the tree and it withered. We have in

this country a upas tree named the liquor traffic. It is not a barren

tree, but far worse than barren. Its branches bend with the weight of

its fruit, but not a pint, nor a quart, nor gallon, nor barrel from

its boughs ever benefited a single mortal by its use as a beverage.

Its leaves drip with poison and the bones of its dead victims would

build a pyramid as high as Appenines piled on the Alps. Jesus withered

the tree that produced nothing. We license and cultivate the tree

whose fruitage the Bible compares to the bite of a serpent, the sting

of an adder and the poison of asps.

In the earlier days of the temperance movement, when we discussed the

question along moral lines, the license advocates made it an economic

question, but since the commercial world is fast becoming a great

temperance league, and great industries are blacklisting the saloon as

an enemy of legitimate business, the liquor advocates are taking

refuge behind the Bible, and claiming that He who cursed the tree that

was barren, planted the one whose root and heart, bark and branches

are poisoning the blood of the nation. They pervert scripture, take

isolated passages and present an ominum gatherum of quotations to

prove the Bible indorses the use of strong drink. By the same process

I can prove one of these Bible license scholars should hang himself

and be in haste about it. I read on one page of the Bible, "Judas went

out and hanged himself." On another page I read, "Go thou and do

likewise." And on another, "Whatsoever thou doest, do it quickly."

Against these sacrilegious uses of scripture, I place the estimate of

the fruit of this upas tree from one whose words are unmistakable, and

whose wisdom none can question. Solomon said: "Wine is a _mocker_."

Was there ever a word of more weight in its application? When a boy in

school nothing so vexed me and made me want to fight, as for a boy to

_mock_ me. I remember when one of the prettiest girls in school made

faces at me and _mocked_ me; from that hour I could never see any

beauty in that girl's face, nor have I quite forgiven her to this day.

When the Jews wanted to heap the greatest indignity possible upon

Jesus, when they had driven the nails in His hands, pierced His side,

placed the crown of thorns upon His head and pressed the bitter cup to

His lips, they stood off and _mocked_ Him.

Is wine a mocker? Did Solomon know what he was talking about when he

gave it that detestable name? He added still another word and called

it a deceiver. Does it deceive and mock? It meets a young man at a

social feast, garlands itself with the graces of hospitality, sparkles

in the brilliant jewels of fashion, smiles through the faces of female

beauty, furnishes inspiration for the dance and mingles with music,

mirth and hilarity. Gently it takes the young man by the hand, leads

him down the green, flowery sward of license, filled with the rich

aroma of the wild flowers of life. When it has firmly fixed itself in

his appetite, it begins to strip him of his manhood as hail strips the

trees, and when, with will-power gone, nerves shattered, eyes bleared

and face bloated, he stands with the last vestige of manly beauty

swept from the shattered temple of the soul, it stands off and _mocks_

him. It goes to a home, tramples upon the pure unselfish love of a

wife, enthrones the shadow of a drunkard's poverty upon the

hearth-stone, makes the empty cupboard echo the wail of hungry

children for bread, with its bloody talons marks the door lintels with

the death sentence of an immortal soul, and then stands off and

_mocks_ the home. It goes to the Congress of the United States and

says: "Put upon me the harness of taxation and I'll pull you out of

the mire of national debt, and make the administration of the party in

power a financial success." Then with a government permit, it proceeds

to take out of the pockets of the people five times as much as it pays

the government; creates three-fourths of the country's crimes,

four-fifths of its pauperism, sixty per cent. of its divorces, dooms

to poverty and shame a great army of children, blights rosebuds of

beauty on cheeks of innocence, shatters oaks of manhood, leaves its

polluting taint upon all that it touches, and then stands off and

mocks the republic. Was there ever more meaning condensed into one

brief utterance than in Solomon's warning, "Wine is a mocker, strong

drink is raging, and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise?" Is it

wisdom in this republic to deliberately, for revenue, set in motion

causes that neutralize its progress, waste its forces and destroy the

fireside nurseries of the nation's destiny?

If I were an artist I would now place before you a picture of an ideal

American home. I would not make it the fine mansion on the avenue, nor

would I make it "the old log cabin in the lane." I would make it a

neat country home with garden of flowers, orchard of fruits, a barn

lot with bubbling spring and laughing brook. In the door of this home

I would place an American mother with the youngest of four children in

her arms; the oldest son driving his tired team to the barn, the

second one the cows to the cupping, the daughter spreading the cloth

for tea, and the head of the house sinking the iron-bound bucket in

the well for a draught of cold water when day's work for loved ones is

o'er. Approaching the door a commission appointed by Congress on

political economy lift their hats as the spokesman says: "Madam, are

you mistress of this mansion?"

"I am the wife and mother of this humble home, gentlemen; the man at

the well is my husband."

"Madam, we are commissioned by Congress to investigate the home life

of the country and would like to learn what this home is doing for the

republic."

"Come in, gentlemen, and be seated, while I call my husband. We feel

honored by your visit and would be pleased to have you take tea with

us."

The invitation is readily accepted and after a good country supper the

investigation proceeds. In answer to the question as to the relation

of the home to the welfare of the republic, the head of the house

says: "Gentlemen, we are trying to keep our home pure; it is our

purpose to make our boys patriotic American citizens and our daughters

true American women. We love God and endeavor to keep His

commandments, and this is about all I can say about our home."

"That is well so far, but may we ask what sacrifice would this home be

willing to make for the republic if its flag were in peril?"

The wife exclaims: "You alarm us by your question. Is our country in

danger?"

"Yes, madam. The combined forces of the Old World are nearing our

shores and the republic is in peril."

"Wait, gentlemen, until we talk it over."

The family retires for consultation and soon the mother appears, and

with tears in her eyes says: "Gentlemen, we've decided. Take our

oldest boy, who is eager to go. Take him to the battlefield; if he

falls in defense of his country's flag, come back, we'll kiss the

second one and tell him, 'go fill your brother's place.' Gentlemen, we

love our country next to our God and this home is pledged to this

country's honor."

I say, any country that has such mothers for its patriotism, such

guardians for its homes, should protect these homes and mothers with

all the power of police, all the majesty of law, and any evil that

attempts to destroy these homes ought not to be licensed, but should

be buried as the old Scotch woman would bury the devil--with "face

down, so the more he scratched the deeper he would go."

I am sick of the hollow sentiment, "the hand that rocks the cradle

rules the world," insofar as it relates to the drink problem. If the

hand that rocks the cradle did rule the world, there would not be two

hundred thousand rum-fiend vultures soaring over the cradle homes of

our country today. If a mother could keep her boy in the cradle she

might rule the world, but the trouble is, the boy gets too big for the

cradle and jumps out. In the cradle he's mama's child, coos if mama

coos, and laughs when mama laughs; but out of the cradle he's papa's

boy, swears if papa swears, smokes if papa smokes, drinks if papa

drinks. If papa does none of these things, then the world, ruled by

hands that don't rock cradles, steps in with licensed schools of vice

to teach him to drink.

When General Grant was President of the United States he appointed an

old colored man mail-carrier over a route in the mountains of

Virginia. One day, when in a lonely spot, two robbers faced the negro

and demanded the mail. The old man, lifting himself in his saddle

said:

"Gentlemen, I is de mail-carrier of de United States; you touch dis

darkey and you'll have de whole army of dis government on you in

twenty fo' hours."

Blessed will be the day when every mother in our land can say to the

saloon: "You touch my home and you'll have the police power of this

republic on your heels in twenty-four hours."

But, who is the government? We are told that in the early history of

this country, a country magistrate rode horseback from Maryland to

Washington to consult the government. Going to the White House he was

informed the government was not there. At the Capitol he was informed

the people are the government. He returned home, called the voters of

his county to a meeting in the courthouse and said: "Gentlemen, I have

a very important question I want to present to the government." So I

desire to talk to the government, you voters who are to decide the

policy of this republic regarding the liquor traffic.

An Irishman brought before the court for an assault upon a saloon

keeper was questioned by the judge, who said: "Mr. Dolan, what have

you to say; are you guilty or innocent of the charge made against

you?"

The Irishman replied: "By me soul, judge, I couldn't tell ye. I was

blind, stavin' drunk on the manest whiskey ye iver tasted, yer honor."

"I do not use whiskey of any kind," said the judge.

"Ye don't. Thin I don't think ye are doin' yer duty by such

constituents as meself. Ye license men to sell the stuff; ye ought to

taste the stuff ye license men to sell, thin ye would know how it

makes a gintlemen behave himself."

The judge rapped for order in the court and repeated the question,

"Are you guilty or innocent of the charge?"

"Judge, I'll state the case and let yer honor decide for me, which ye

are hired to do anyway. I was standin' by the corner of the strate on

me way home from work, when I spied the bottles in the window of the

saloon. The sight of thim bottles made me thirsty, so I wint in and

took a drink. Jist thin three other thirsty ones came in and I took a

drink with thim; thin they took a drink with me and we kept on

drinkin' till we thought we were back in auld Ireland at Donnybrook

Fair. Whenever we saw a head we struck it and I suppose this

gintlemin's head came my way. Now here's the case, judge. If I hadn't

taken the whiskey, I wouldn't a been in the row, for I'm always

paceable whin sober; if the saloon hadn't been there I wouldn't have

taken the whiskey; and if the Court hadn't licensed the saloon it

wouldn't have been there. Ye can take the case, sir."

What makes the drunkard? The drink. What supplies the drink? The

saloon. What makes the saloon? The law. Who makes the law? The

legislator. Who makes the legislator? The voter. It's the "House that

Jack built," only I will change the verbage a little. Intemperance is

the fire the devil built. Strong drink is the fuel that feeds the fire

the devil built. Distilleries, breweries and saloons are the axes that

cut the fuel that feeds the fire the devil built. License laws are

molds that cast the axes, that cut the fuel that feeds the fire the

devil built. License voters and legislators are the patentees who

invented the molds that cast the axes that cut the fuel that feeds the

fire the devil built. Prohibition ballots are the sledge hammers

destined to destroy the molds that cast the axes that cut the fuel

that feeds the fire the devil built.

There is a chain of responsibility running through the drink question

which many good men fail to recognize. You know a chain is made up of

links welded together. The drunkard is only one link; he is not a

chain. When you link him to the drink then you begin the chain; the

drunkard comes from the drink. That is not all of the chain however;

the drink is linked to the saloon. If you have the saloon, you have

the drink, you have the drunkard. This is not all of the chain; you

have the license law. If you have the license law, you have the

saloon, you have the drink, you have the drunkard. There is yet

another link; the license law is linked to the license voter. The

drunkard comes from the drink, the drink comes from the saloon, the

saloon from the law, and law from the license voter. Who are the

license voters? Many of them are Christian men on their way to heaven;

but the trouble with them is the other end of the chain is going

another road. "No drunkard can enter the kingdom of heaven."

I know it is a common remark that this is a free country, and if a man

chooses to drink, let him do so and take the consequences. If one

could take alone the consequences of his sin there might be some claim

to personal liberty. But when a man's liberty involves another life

the scene changes. A young man may commit a sin in social life and by

reform be forgiven, but when that other life involved in his sin, is

seen in after years, walking the streets in painted shame, reproducing

the consequences of that man's sin, memory and conscience will combine

to give him waking hours while the world sleeps. A man may never enter

a saloon, never take a drink of intoxicating liquor, but if he votes

for the saloon his life becomes involved in the consequences of the

saloon. What are the consequences? Here is a sample. After a three

days' blizzard in one of our large cities a reformer visited a morgue

and seeing a large clothes-hamper full of dead babies he said: "What

does this mean?"

The reply came: "They were gathered from the drunkards' hovels of the

city this morning."

The visitor tells us: "Their bodies were frozen, and several arms were

sticking up out of the basket as if reaching out after life and love."

The streets of our city slums are rivers along whose shores at

midnight can be heard the death gurgle of helpless little ones, while

poverty's row is full of children cursed by inheritance, who are not

living but merely existing by scraping the moss of bare subsistence

from empty buckets in wells of poverty; and the air is freighted with

oaths and obscenities from demonized men and demi-monde women who pour

the poison of their blood into the social life of city slums.

I was both grieved and amazed when I read from the pen of a brilliant

Kentucky editor an editorial denouncing as tyrannical a sumptuary law

that "denies to a citizen the right to order his home, his meat, his

drink, his clothing, according to his conscience." I wonder if the

great editor ever considered the sumptuary law of the saloon. Every

woman who fills the holy office of wife and mother has a right to a

home. The sumptuary law of the saloon says to hundreds of thousands of

such women: "You shall not have a home; you shall live in a hovel. You

shall not order your home, your food, your drink, your clothing,

according to your conscience, but according to the best interest of

the saloon these comforts shall be ordered. You shall work all day in

the harness of oppression and when night comes instead of restful

sleep, you shall watch the stars out and wait the return of husband

and sons." What about this inhuman denial of the right to order meat,

drink, clothing and home life? Such is the sumptuary law of the

saloon.

Every child in this country has a right to an education and a chance

in the world. The saloons say to hosts of children: "You shall have

neither education nor opportunity. You shall go to the streets and

sweat-shops to earn bread. You shall live in ignorance and mid evil

environment that we may gather in the wages of your fathers." How does

this sumptuary law of the saloon compare with a sumptuary law that

forbids the sale of what is of no earthly or eternal benefit to any

one who uses it.

The same distinguished editor said: "When women gather around voting

booths on election days with sandwiches and coffee, they present an

indecent spectacle to the public." The man who goes with gun in hand

and shoots down another in defense of his country is a hero. The

mother lion or bear that defies the hunter's bullets and dies in

defense of her young we can but respect; but when woman, who has

suffered so long in silence, goes near where the welfare of her home

is at stake and out of the sore, sad sorrow of her heart appeals to

men for protection to her home from the ravages of the saloon, she is

not paid the respect given to a mother hen or bird or bear by the

advocate of the liquor traffic. When the niece of Cardinal Richelieu

was demanded by a licentious king, the Cardinal said: "Around her form

I draw the awful circle of our kingly church; set a foot within and on

thy head, aye, though it wear a crown, shall fall the curse of Rome."

Shall the crown of gold on the distiller's and brewer's brow hush into

silence the lion-hearted manhood of our republic when its sons and

daughters are demanded to feed the maw of the liquor traffic?

One of the famous pictures of the masters is of a woman bound fast to

a pillar within the tide-mark of the ocean. The waves are curling

about her feet. A ship is passing under full sail but no one seems to

see or heed the woman in peril. Birds of prey hover above her, but she

sees neither bird, nor ship, nor sea; knowing her doom is sealed, she

lifts her eyes to heaven and prays. This picture represents thousands

of women tied fast to their doom within the tide-waves of the ocean of

intemperance. The ship of state passes by, bearing its share of the

ill-gotten gains of the liquor traffic, but heeds not the moans and

cries of struggling, strangling, dying woman. Oliver Cromwell said:

"It is relative misgovernment that lashes nations into fury." The long

suffering in silence by the womanhood of this country from the

misgovernment that has heaped upon woman the woes of strong drink by

the licensed saloon, whether a tribute to the patience of woman or

not, is to the eternal shame of man, whose inhumanity to woman through

the liquor traffic is making "countless millions mourn."

To this misgovernment is due the unrest among women and the impetus

behind the equal suffrage movement today. There needs to be a saving

influence brought into our political life, and I have faith to believe

that woman's ballot will provide that influence. Having proved her

dignity in every new field of activity she has entered, I believe the

same flowers of refinement will adorn the ballot box when she holds in

her hand the sacred trust of franchise. Her life-long habit of

house-cleaning will be carried to the dirty pool of politics, where

the saloon is entrenched, and the demagogue and demijohn will be

carted away to the garbage pile of discarded rubbish.

Now and then I am asked: "What will become of the men who are engaged

in the liquor business if the country goes dry? What will become of

their families?" I answer by asking: What becomes of the men the

saloons put out of business? What becomes of their families? When

prohibition puts a man out of business, it leaves him his brain,

blood, bone, muscle, nerves and whatever manhood he has left in store,

while his long rest from active toil has given him a reserve force for

active, useful business. When the saloon puts a man out of business,

he goes out with shattered nerves, weak will, poisoned blood and so

unfitted for service no place is open for him to earn a living.

Recently a man put out of business by prohibition said to me: "This

town went dry seven years ago, and going out of the saloon business

has been such a benefit to me and to my family, I shall work and vote

to put all other saloon-keepers in this state out of business for

their own good."

On the other hand, I have in mind a man who once chained the Congress

of the United States by his eloquence. Clients clamored for his

service, and prosperity crowned his practice in the courts. In

drinking saloons he lost his clientage and in penniless poverty he

died--unwept, unhonored, unsung. The ex-saloon-keeper to whom I

referred is city marshall and very popular, while the man put out of

business by the saloon has no chance:

"Where he goes and how he fares,

Nobody knows and nobody cares."

Along with the question of what will become of the men put out of

business by prohibition, comes the question, what will the farmers do

with their corn if distilleries are closed? Less consumption of

whiskey means more consumption of cornbread and that means more corn.

Less consumption of whiskey means greater consumption of bacon, and

more bacon means more corn to feed hogs. When a liquor advocate said

to an audience of farmers: "If this state goes dry what will you

farmers do with your corn," an old, level-headed farmer shouted:

"We'll raise more hogs and less hell."

Prohibition means more of everything good, and less of everything bad;

more manhood, less meanness; more gain, less groans; more bread, less

brawls; more clothing, less cussedness; less heartaches and more

happiness. Turn saloons into bake shops and butcher stalls,

distilleries into food factories, breweries into stock pens, and the

country will be a thousandfold better off than feeding its finances by

starving its morality.

This question lifts itself head and shoulders above every other

question touching practical politics today. You nowhere read of a

nation going to destruction because of too much gold or too little

silver, too much tariff or too little tariff, but always because of

the vices of its people. The nation that bases perpetuity upon moral

character will endure with the stars, while walls thick and high as

Babylon's will not save a drunken republic.

"Vain mightiest fleets of iron found,

Vain all her conquering guns,

Unless Columbia keeps unstained

The true hearts of her sons."

Beautiful Constance of France was dressing for a court ball. While

standing before a mirror, clasping a necklace of pearls, a spark from

the fireplace caught in the folds of her gown. Absorbed in her attire,

she did not detect the danger until a blaze started. Soon, rolling on

the floor in flames, she burned to death. When the news reached the

ballroom the music hushed, the dance halted, and "Poor Constance! Poor

Constance!" went from lip to lip, but soon the music started and the

dance went on. While I am talking now the youth, beauty and sweetness

of American life is in peril from the flames that are kindled by the

licensed saloon. From an inward fire men are being consumed and homes

destroyed. Will we say, "Poor Columbia!" and keep step to the

_mocker's_ march to the nation's death; or will we put out every

distillery and brewery fire and make this in reality "the land of the

free and the home of the brave?"

In the name of all that is pure and true and vital in national life, I

plead with every lover of home and country to come to the help of the

cause that must succeed if this republic is to live. I plead with

Christians in the name of the church, bleeding at every pore because

of the curse of drink. If everyone whose name is on a church roll

would step out in line of duty on this question, very soon God would

stretch out His arm and save this republic from the liquor traffic.

God has been ready a long time; His people have not been ready to do

their part. Too many Christians are like the horse Sam Jones used to

tell of.

He said: "We have a horse in my neighborhood in Georgia, which if

hitched to a load of stone or cotton balks and won't go a step; but in

light harness in the shafts of a race cart he will pace a mile in

two-thirty. We have too many Christians who are like this horse; they

trot out to church Sunday morning, but hitch them to a prayer meeting

and they won't pull a pound."

Dr. McLeod, the stalwart Scotch preacher, on his way to a session of

his church had with him a small hunch-back member of his church, a

dwarf in size but an earnest worker. Crossing a certain stream a storm

struck the boat and the waves were sending it toward the rocks. A

boatman at one end said:

"Let the big preacher pray for us."

The helmsman at the other end said: "No, let that little fellow pray

and the big one take an oar."

Oliver Cromwell, going through a cathedral, came upon twelve silver

statues. Turning to the guide he said: "Who are these?"

The guide replied: "Those are the twelve apostles, life-size and solid

silver."

Cromwell said: "What good are they doing as silver apostles? Melt them

down into money and let them be of some service to the country."

We have too many silver statue church members who need melting down

and sending out to help save our republic from the fate of other

nations that have perished through their vices. We need more men with

moral courage to voice and vote their convictions. When the slavery

question was agitating the country Henry Clay stood for a compromise

he believed would help to solve the question. Many of his friends in

the South censured him, and sent him letters calling him a traitor. He

arose in the Senate to speak, it is said, looking pale from the effect

of the censure he was then receiving day by day. Addressing the Senate

he said: "I suppose what I shall say in this address will cost me many

dear friends." A reporter said: "He hesitated as if choked with

emotion at the thought of losing his friends." Then with the majesty

of greatness and magnetism of manner he proceeded, saying: "I am

charged with being ambitious. If I had listened to the soft

whisperings of ambition I would have stood still, gazed upon the

raging storm and let the ship of state drift on with the winds. I seek

no office at the cost of courage or conviction. Pass this bill.

Restore affection to the states of this Union and I will go back to my

Ashland home; there in its groves, on its lawns, 'mid my flocks and

herds, and in the bosom of my family, I will find a sincerity I have

not found in the public walks of life. Yes, I am ambitious, but my

ambition is that I may become the humble instrument in the hands of

God, in restoring harmony to a distracted nation, and behold the

glorious spectacle of a true, united happy and prosperous people."

There is a grandeur in the mountain that lifts itself above the

hamlets at its base, and bearing its brow to the threatening storm

clouds says to the forked lightning, "Strike me!" but grander is the

man who can stand 'mid the allurements of the world's honors and say:

"I would rather be right than President." Dare to do right and what

you do will have its reward.

"Shamgar, what's that in thy hand?"

"Only an ox-goad."

"Come dedicate it to God, and go slay those Philistines."

"David, what's that in thy hand?"

"Only a sling and a little stone from the brook."

"Come dedicate them to God, and go kill the giant."

"My little lad, what's that you have?"

"Only five loaves and two little fishes."

"Come, dedicate them to God; they'll feed thousands and you will have

baskets full left."

My brother, what's that in thy hand? Only a little American ballot.

Come dedicate it to God and home and native land, go cast it against

the licensed liquor traffic and your life will bear fruit which the

angels will gather when you have "finished your course" and "kept the

faith."

You are soon to have the local option test in your county. If I could

do one thing I could make the victory for the home overwhelming. You

know if the saloons continue they will have their victims in the

future as they have had in the past. You know too their victims will

come from the youth of your county. Those who are victims now will

soon be dead bodies, or "dead broke." The men in the saloon business

do not look to men who are drunkards now, for future use nor do they

intend to use horses or cattle or dogs, but _boys_. If I could

announce that on the evening before the vote is to be taken I would

present to the public the future victims of the saloons in this

county. If I had a prophet's eye and could select these victims, how

many homes I would enter where I would not only be an unwelcome but an

unexpected visitor. When the hour would arrive for the exhibition,

what an audience I would have! Nothing like it ever gathered in this

county; from every corner of it parents would come. When placed in

line on an elevated platform so all could see, I would speak through a

megaphone saying: "I present to you the future victims of the liquor

traffic in your county; here are the boys who will be your future

drunkards and here are the girls who will be the wives of drunkards."

I imagine some father, who thinks regulation the best policy, would

exclaim:

"There's my boy. I never thought the saloon would take my son. Don't

talk to me about regulation. Come, you fathers whose sons are not

here, and help me save my boy."

Another would press through the crowd to be sure that he was not

mistaken and say: "There's my daughter. I never dreamt she would be a

drunkard's wife. I have said prohibition won't prohibit, but I will

say it no more. Come, good fathers who love your children, and help me

save my child."

This is but the forecast for some parents in this audience. Would it

be wrong if I should say: "O God, if the saloons are to continue in

this county, if they are to have their victims in the future as in the

past, let the fathers who vote the curse on the county furnish the

victims." I do not offer up any such prayer, but I do say: "O God,

give to the home the protection of a prohibition law, and may the

victims not be anybody's boy or anybody's girl. Go out of this hall

tonight resolved you will link your faith in principle with your work.

Faith and work!"

I like that story of the mother in New England, who on a visit from

home, received a message calling her to the bedside of a daughter who

was hopelessly ill. Hurrying to the nearest railroad station she said

to the conductor: "Sir, do you connect at the junction with the train

that will take me to my sick child," at the same time handing him the

message.

"No, madam, we do not run our trains to connect with trains on that

road. The train will be gone some little time before we reach the

junction."

"Sir, are you a Christian?"

"No, madam, I'm a railroad conductor."

"Have you a Christian man with the train?"

"Yes, that man you see oiling the engine claims to be a Christian, and

I think he is; you might consult him if you like."

Going to the engineer she said: "Please read this message and tell me

if you can catch that train at the junction."

The engineer read the message and said: "I'm sorry, madam, but that

train goes fifteen minutes before we get there."

"Please sir, catch that train and let me see my daughter before she

dies."

"I would give a whole month's wages if I could," said the tender

hearted engineer.

"Then don't you think God can hold the train fifteen minutes till we

get there," said the distressed mother.

"Oh yes, God can do anything," was the reply.

"Won't you ask God to hold that train? And I will ask Him."

Wit, humor, reason, rhetoric, prose, poetry and story woven into eight popular lectures · 第 25 / 40 题