CHAPTER I.

Produced by Joshua Hutchinson, Gary Rees and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by Cornell University Digital Collections)

THE

INTERNATIONAL

MONTHLY

MAGAZINE

Of Literature, Science, and Art.

VOLUME II.

DECEMBER TO MARCH, 1850-51.

NEW-YORK:

STRINGER & TOWNSEND, 222 BROADWAY.

FOR SALE BY ALL BOOKSELLERS.

BY THE NUMBER, 25 CTS.; THE VOLUME, $1; THE YEAR, $3.

PREFACE.

On completing the second volume of the International Magazine, the

publishers appeal to its pages with confidence for confirmation of all

the promises that have been made with regard to its character. They

believe the verdict of the American journals has been unanimous upon the

point that the _International_ has been the best journal of literary

intelligence in the world, keeping its readers constantly advised of the

intellectual activity of Great Britain, Germany, France, the other

European nations, and our own country. As a journal of the fine arts, it

has been the aim of the editor to render it in all respects just, and as

particular as the space allotted to this department would allow. And its

reproductions of the best contemporary foreign literature bear the names

of Walter Savage Landor, Mazzini, Bulwer, Dickens, Thackeray, Barry

Cornwall, Alfred Tennyson, R.M. Milnes, Charles Mackay, Mrs. Browning,

Miss Mitford, Miss Martineau, Mrs. Hall, and others; its original

translations the names of several of the leading authors of the

Continent, and its anonymous selections the titles of the great Reviews,

Magazines, and Journals, as well as of many of the most important new

books in all departments of literature. But the _International_ is not

merely a compilation; it has embraced in the two volumes already issued,

original papers, by Bishop Spencer of Jamaica, Henry Austen Layard,

LL.D., the most illustrious of living travellers and antiquaries, G.P.R.

James, Alfred B. Street, Bayard Taylor, A.O. Hall, R.H. Stoddard,

Richard B. Kimball, Parke Godwin, William C. Richards, John E. Warren,

Elizabeth Oakes Smith, Mary E. Hewitt, Alice Carey, and other authors of

eminence, whose compositions have entitled it to a place in the first

class of original literary periodicals. Besides the writers hitherto

engaged for the _International_, many of distinguished reputations are

pledged to contribute to its pages hereafter; and the publishers have

taken measures for securing at the earliest possible day the chief

productions of the European press, so that to American readers the

entire Magazine will be as new and fresh as if it were all composed

expressly for their pleasure.

The style of illustration which has thus far been so much approved by

the readers of the _International_, will be continued, and among the

attractions of future numbers will be admirable portraits of Irving,

Cooper, Bryant, Halleck, Prescott, Ticknor, Francis, Hawthorne, Willis,

Kennedy, Mitchell, Mayo, Melville, Whipple, Taylor, Dewey, Stoddard, and

other authors, accompanied as frequently as may be with views of their

residences, and sketches of their literary and personal character.

Indeed, every means possible will be used to render the _International

Magazine_ to every description of persons the most valuable as well as

the most entertaining miscellany in the English language.

CONTENTS:

VOLUME II. DECEMBER TO MARCH, 1850-51.

Adams, John, upon Riches, 426

Ambitious Brooklet, The.--_By A.O. Hall_, 477

Accidents will Happen.--_By C. Astor Bristed_, 81

Anima Mundi.--_By R.M. Milnes_, 393

Astor Library, The. (Illustrated,) 436

Attempts to Discover the Northwest Passage, On the, 166

Audubon, John James.--_By Rufus W. Griswold_, 469

Age, Old.--_By Alfred B. Street_, 474

_Arts, The Fine._--Munich and Schwanthaler's "Bavaria," 26.--Art in

Florence, 27.--W.W. Story's Return from Italy, 27.--Les Beautes de la

France, 27.--History of Art Exhibitions, 28.--Enamel Painting at

Berlin, 28.--Portrait of Sir Francis Drake, 28.--The Vernets,

28.--Leutze, Powers, &c., 28.--Kaulbach, 28.--Illustrations of Homer,

28.--Old Pictures, 29.--Michael Angelo, 29.--Conversations by the

Academy of Design, 29.--David's Napoleon Crossing the Alps, 29.--Gift

from the Bavarian Artists to the King, 190.--Charles Eastlake,

190.--New Picture by Kaulbach, 190.--Russian Porcelain, 190.--Mr.

Healey, 191.--Von Kestner on Art, 191.--Russian Music in Paris,

191.--The Goethe Inheritance, 191.--Art Unions; their True Character

Considered, 191.--Waagner's "Art in the Future," 313.--Thorwaldsen,

313.--Heidel's "Illustrations of Goethe," 313.--A New Art,

313.--Albert Durer's Illustrations of the Prayer Book, 313.--Moritz

Rugendus, and his Sketches of American Scenery, 314.--An Art Union in

Vienna, 314.--New Picture by Kaulbach, 314.--Powers's "America,"

314.--Dr. Baun's Essay on the two Chief Groups of the Friese of the

Parthenon, 314.--Victor Orsel's Paintings in the Church of Notre Dame

de Lorelle, 314.--Ehninger's Illustrations of Irving, 314.--Wolff's

Paris, 314.--M. Leutze's "Washington Crossing the Delaware,"

460.--Discovery of a Picture by Michael Angelo, 460.--The Munich Art

Union, 460.

_Authors and Books._--A Visit to Henry Heine, 15.--Dr. Zirckel's

"Sketches from and concerning the United States," 16.--Aerostation,

17.--New Works by M. Guizot, 17.--Works on the German Revolution,

18.--Dr. Zimmer's Universal History, 18.--Schlosser, 18.--MS. of Le

Bel Discovered, 19.--M. Bastiat alive, and plagiarizing,

19.--Caesarism, 19.--Songs of Carinthia, 20.--Mr. Bryant, 20.--Dr.

Laing, 20.--French Reviewal of Mr. Elliot's History of Liberty,

20.--Dr. Bowring, 21.--Henry Rogers and Reviews, 21.--Rabbi Schwartz

on the Holy Land, 21.--Mr. John R. Thompson, 21.--German Reviewal of

"Fashion," 22.--Ruskin's New Work, 21.--Oehlenschlager's Memoirs,

22.--Planche on Lamartine, 22.--Prosper Merimee, his Book on America,

&c., 22.--Hawthorne, 22.--Matthews, the American Traveller,

23.--Professor Adler's Translation of the Iphigenia in Taurus,

23.--The Pekin Gazette, 23.--New Book by the author of "Shakespeare

and his Friends," 23.--Vaulabelle's French History, 23.--Sir Edward

Belcher, 23.--Guizot an Editor again, 23.--Life of Southey,

23.--Bulwer's _Ears_, 23.--The Count de Castelnau on South America,

23.--Diplomatic and Literary Studies of Alexis de Saint Priest,

24.--Mrs. Putnam's Review of Bowen, 24.--Herr Thaer, 24.--New Work

announced in England, 24.--"Sir Roger de Coverley; by the Spectator,"

25.--Memoir of Judge Story, 25.--Garland's Life of John Randolph,

25.--Sir Edgerton Brydges's edition of Milton's Poems, 25.--The

Keepsake, 25.--Gray's Poems, 25.--Rev. Professor Weir, 25.--Douglas

Jerrold's Complete Works, 25.--Memoirs of the Poet Wordsworth, by his

Nephew, 25.--New German books on Hungary, 173.--"Polish Population in

Galicia," 173.--Travels and Ethnological works of Professor Reguly,

174.--Works on Ethnology, published by the Austrian Government,

174.--Karl Gutzlow, 174.--Neandar's Library, 174.--Karl Simrock's

Popular Songs, 175.--Belgian Literature, 175.--Prof. Johnston's Work

on America, 175.--Literary and Scientific Works at Giessen,

175.--Beranger, 175.--The House of the "Wandering Jew," 176.--The

Count de Tocqueville upon Dr. Franklin, &c., 176.--Audubon's Last

Work, 176.--Book Fair at Leipsic, 176.--Baroness von Beck,

177.--Berghaus's Magazine, Albert Gallatin, &c., 177.--Auerback's

Tales, 177.--Baron Sternberg, 177.--"The New Faith Taught in Art,"

177.--Freiligrath, 177.--New Adventure and Discovery in Africa,

178.--French Almanacs, 178.--The _Algemeine Zeitung_ on Literary

Women, 178.--Cormenin on War, 178.--Writers of "Young France,"

179.--George Sand's Last Works, 179.--New Books on the French

Revolution, Mirabeau, Massena, &c., 179.--Cousin, 179.--Tomb of

Godfrey of Bouillon, 179.--Maxims of Frederic the Great, 179.--New

Poems by Elizabeth Barrett Browning, 180.--Rectorship of Glasgow

University, 180.--Tennyson, 180.--Mayhew, D'Israeli, Leigh Hunt, The

Earl of Carlisle, &c., 180.--New Work by Joseph Balmes, 180.--The late

Mrs. Bell Martin, 181.--The _Athenaeum_ on Mrs. Mowatt's Novels,

181.--New work by Mrs. Southworth, 181.--Charles Mackay, sent to

India, 182.--Pensions to Literary Men, 182.--German Translation of

Ticknor's History of Spanish Literature, 182.--David Copperfield,

183.--D.D. Field and the English Lawyers, 183.--Louisiana Historical

Collections, 183.--Elihu Burritt's Absurdities, 184.--John Mills,

184.--Dr. Latham's "Races of Men," 184.--Homoeopathic Review,

184.--Bohn's Publications, 184.--Professor Reed's Rhetoric, 185.--Mr.

Bancroft's forthcoming History, 185.--Dr. Schoolcraft, 185.--MS. of

Dr. Johnson's Memoirs, 185.--Literary "Discoveries," 185.--M.

Girardin, 185.--Vulgar Lying of the last English Traveller in America,

186.--The Real Peace Congress, 186.--Milton, Burke, Mazzini, Webster,

187.--Sir Francis Head, 187.--Dr. Bloomfield, 187.--New Book by Mr.

Cooper, 187.--Mr. Judd's "Richard Edney," 187.--E.G. Squier,

Hawthorne, &c., 187.--The Author of "Olive," on the Sphere of Woman,

188.--Flemish Poems, 188.--"Lives of the Queens of Scotland,"

188.--John S. Dwight, 188.--History of the Greek Revolution, 188.--New

Edition of the Works of Goethe, 188.--W.G. Simms, Dr. Holmes, &c.,

188.--The Songs of Pierre Dupont, 189.--Arago and Prudhon,

189.--Charles Sumner, 189.--"The Manhattaner in New Orleans,"

189.--"Reveries of a Bachelor," "Vala," &c., 189.--Of Personalities,

297.--Last Work of Oersted, 298.--New Dramas, 299.--German Novels,

300.--Hungarian Literature, 301.--New German Book on America,

301.--Ruckert's "Annals of German History," 301.--Zschokke's Private

Letters, 301.--Works by Bender and Burmeister, 301.--The Countess

Hahn-Hahn, 302.--"Value of Goethe as a Poet," 302.--Hagen's History of

Recent Times, 302.--Cotta's Illustrated Bible, 302.--Wallon's History

of Slavery, 302.--Translation of the Journal of the U.S. Exploring

Expedition into German, 302.--Richter's Translation of Mrs. Barbauld,

302.--Bodenstet's New Book on the East, 302.--Third Part of Humboldt's

"Cosmos," &c., 303.--Dr. Espe, 303.--The Works of Neander, 303.--Works

of Luther, 303.--_L'Universe Pittoresque_, 303.--M. Nisard,

303.--French Documentary Publications, 303.--M. Ginoux, 303.--M.

Veron, 304.--Eugene Sue's New Books, 304.--George Sand in the Theatre,

304.--Alphonse Karr, 304.--Various new Publications in Paris,

304.--The Catholic Church and Pius IX., 305.--Notices of Hayti,

305.--Work on Architecture, by Gailhabaud, 305.--Italian Monthly

Review, 305.--Discovery of Letters by Pope, 305.--Lord Brougham,

305.--Alice Carey, 305.--Mrs. Robinson ("Talvi"), 306.--New Life of

Hannah More, 306.--Professor Hackett on the Alps, 306.--Mrs. Anita

George, 307.--Life and Works of Henry Wheaton, 308.--R.R. Madden,

308.--Rev. E.H. Chapin on "Woman," 308.--Discovery of Historical

Documents of Quebec, 308.--Professor Andrews's Latin Lexicon,

309.--"Salander," by Mr. Shelton, 309.--Prof. Bush on Pneumatology,

309.--Satire on the Rappers, by J.R. Lowell, 309.--Henry C. Phillips

on the Scenery of the Central Regions of America, 310.--Sam. Adams no

Defaulter, 310.--Mr. Willis, 310.--Life of Calvin, 310.--Notes of a

Howadje, 310.--Mr. Putnam's "World's Progress," 310.--Mr. Whittier,

310.--New Volume of Hildreth's History of the United States, 311.--The

Memorial of Mrs. Osgood, 311.--Fortune Telling in Paris,

311.--Writings of Hartley Coleridge, 311.--New Books forthcoming in

London, 312.--Mr. Cheever's "Island World of the Pacific," 312.--Works

of Bishop Onderdonk, 312.--Moreau's _Imitatio Christi_, 312.--New

German Poems, 312.--Schroeder on the Jews, 312.--Arago on Ballooning,

312.--Books prohibited at Naples, 312.--Notices of Mazzini,

313.--Charles Augustus Murray, 313.--New History of Woman,

313.--Letters on Humboldt's Cosmos, 446.--German Version of the

"Vestiges of Creation," 447.--Hegel's _Aesthetik_, 447.--New Work in

France on the Origin of the Human Race, 448.--Lelewel on the Geography

of the Middle Ages, 448.--More German Novels, 448.--"Man in the Mirror

of Nature," 449.--Herr Kielhau, on Geology, 449.--Proposed Prize for a

Defence of Absolutism, 449.--Werner's Christian Ethics, 449.--William

Meinhold, 449.--Prize History of the Jews, 449.--English Version of

Mrs. Robinson's Work on America, 449.--Poems by Jeanne Marie,

449.--General Gordon's Memoirs, 449.--George Sand's New Drama,

449.--Other New French Plays, 451.--M. Cobet's History of France,

451.--Rev. G.R. Gleig, 451.--Ranke's Discovery of MSS. by Richelieu,

451.--George Sand on Bad Spelling, 451.--Lola Montes,

451.--Montalembert, 451.--Glossary of the Middle Ages, 451.--A Coptic

Grammar, 451.--The Italian Revolution, 452.--Italian Archaeological

Society, 452.--Abaddie, the French Traveller, 452.--The Vatican

Library, 452.--New Ode by Piron, 452.--Posthumous Works of Rossi,

452.--Bailey, the Author of "Festus," 453.--Clinton's _Fasti_,

453.--Captain Cunningham, 453.--Dixon's Life of Penn, 453.--Literary

Women in England, 453.--Miss Martineau's History of the Last Half

Century, 453.--The Lexington Papers, 453.--Captain Medwin, 453.--John

Clare, 454.--De Quincy's Writings, 454.--Bulwer's Poems,

454.--Episodes of Insect Life, 454.--Dr. Achilli, 454.--Samuel Bailey,

454.--Major Poussin, and his Work on the United States, 454.--French

Collections in Political Economy, 455.--Joseph Gales, 456.--Rev. Henry

T. Cheever, 456.--Job R. Tyson on Colonial History, 456.--Henry James,

456.--Torrey and Neander, 457.--Works of John C. Calhoun,

457.--Historic Certainties respecting Early America, 457.--Mr.

Schoolcraft, 457.--Dr. Robert Knox, 458.--Mr. Boker's Plays, 458.--The

_Literary World_ upon a supposed Letter of Washington, 458.--Dr.

Ducachet's Dictionary of the Church, 458.--Edith May's Poems,

458.--The American Philosophical Society, 458.--Professor Hows,

458.--Mr. Redfield's Publications, 458.--Rev. William W. Lord's New

Poem, 450.

Battle of the Churches in England, 327

Ballad of Jessie Carol.--_By Alice Carey_, 230

Barry Cornwall's Last Song, 392

Bereaved Mother, To a.--_By Hermann_, 476

Biographies, Memoirs, &c., 425

Black Pocket-Book, The, 89

Bombay, A View of.--_By Peter Leicester_, 130

Boswell, The Killing of Sir Alexander, 329

Bronte and her Sisters, Sketches of Miss, 315

Burke, Edmund, His Residences and Grave.--_By Mrs. S.C. Hall._

(Illustrated.) 145

Bunjaras, The, 377

Burlesques and Parodies, 426

Byron, Scott, and Carlyle, Goethe's Opinions of, 461

Camille Desmoulins, 326

Carey, Henry C.--_By Rufus W. Griswold_, 402

Castle in the Air, The.--_By R.H. Stoddard_, 474

Chatterton, Thomas. (Illustrated.) 289

Classical Novels, 161

Count Monte-Leone. Book Second, 45

" " " Third, 216

" " " Third, concluded, 349

" " " Fourth, 495

Cow-Tree of South America, The, 128

Correspondence, Original: A Letter from Paris, 170

Cyprus and the Life Led There, 216

Davis on the Half Century: Etherization, 317

Dacier, Madame, 332

Dante.--_By Walter Savage Landor_, 421

Death, Phenomena of, 425

_Deaths, Recent._--Hon. Samuel Young, 141.--Robinson, the

Caricaturist, 141.--The Duke of Palmella, 142.--Carl Rottmann,

142.--The Marquis de Trans, 142.--Ch. Schorn, 142.--Hon. Richard M.

Johnson, 142.--Wm. Blacker, 142.--Mrs. Martin Bell, 142.--Signor

Baptistide, 142.--Gen. Chastel, 142.--Dr. Medicus, and others,

142.--Rev. Dr. Dwight, 195.--Count Brandenburgh, 196.--Lord Nugent,

196.--M. Fragonard, 196.--M. Droz, 197.--Professor Schorn,

197.--Gustave Schwab, 197.--Francis Xavier Michael Tomie,

427.--Governors Bell and Plumer, 427.--Birch, the Painter,

427.--Professor Sverdrup, W. Seguin, Mrs. Ogilvy, 427.--W. Howison,

428.--H. Royer-Collard, 428.--Col. Williams, 428.--William Sturgeon,

428.--J.B. Anthony, 428.--Mr. Osbaldiston, 428.--Professor Mau,

428.--Madame Junot, Mrs. Wallack, &c., 428.--Herman Kriege,

429.--Madame Schmalz, 429.--George Spence, 429.--General Lumley,

429.--Robert Roscoe, 429.--Richie, the Sculptor, 429.--Martin d'Auch,

429.--Rev. Walter Colton, 568.--Major d'Avezac, 569.--M. Asser,

569.--M. Lapie, 569.--Professor Link, 569.--General St. Martin,

570.--Frederick Bastiat, 570.--Benjamin W. Crowninshield,

571.--Professor Anstey, 571.--Donald McKenzie, 572.--Horace Everett,

LL.D., 572.--James Harfield, 572.--Wm. Wilson, 572.--Professor James

Wallace, 572.--Joshua Milne, 572.--General Bem, 573.--T.S. Davies,

F.R.S., 573.--H.C. Schumacher, 573.--W.H. Maxwell, 573.--Alexander

McDonald, 573.

Dickens, To Charles.--_By Walter Savage Landor_, 75

Drive Round our Neighborhood, in 1850, A.--_By Miss Milford_, 270

Duty.--_By Alfred B. Street_, 332

Duchess, A Peasant, 169

Edward Layton's Reward.--_By Mrs. S.C. Hall_, 201

Editorial Visit, An, 421

Egypt under the Pharaohs.--_By John Kinrick_, 322

Encouragement of Literature by Governments, 160

Exclusion of Love from the Greek Drama, 123

Fountain in the Wood, The, 129

French Generals of To-Day, 334

Gateway of the Oceans, 124

Ghetto of Rome, 393

Gleanings from the Journals, 285

Grief of the Weeping Willow, 31

Haddock, Charles B., Charge d'Affaires to Portugal. (With a

Portrait on steel.) 1

Hecker, Herr, described by Madame Blaze de Bury, 30

_Historical Review._--The United States, 560.--Europe, 564.--Mexico,

565.--British America, 566.--The West Indies, 566.--Central America,

the Isthmus, 566.--South America, 567.--Africa, 567.

Hunt, Leigh, upon G.P.R. James, 30

Ireland in the Last Age: Curran, 519

Journals of Louis Philippe, 377

Kellogg's, Mr., Exploration of Mt. Sinai, 462

Kimball, Richard B., the Author of "St. Leger." (Illustrated.) 156

Layard's Recent Gifts from Nimroud. (Illustrated.) 4

Layard, Austen Henry, LL.D. (With a Portrait,) 433

Lafayette, Talleyrand, Metternich, and Napoleon.--_Sketched

by Lord Holland_, 465

Last Case of the Supernatural, 481

Lectures, Popular, 319

Life at a Watering Place.--_By C. Astor Bristed_, 240

Lionne at a Watering Place, The, 533

Lost Letter, The, 522

Mazzini on Italy, 265

Mackay, Charles, Last Poems by, 348

Marvel, Andrew. (Illustrated.) 438

Mother's Last Song, The.--_By Barry Cornwall_, 270

_Music and the Drama.--The Astor Place Opera, Parodi, 29.--Mrs. Oake

Smith's New Tragedy, 30.

Mystic Vial, The, Part i. 61

" " Part ii. 249

" " Part iii. 378

My Novel, Or Varieties in English Life.--_By Sir Edward

Bulwer Lytton_, Book II. Chapters i. to vi. 109

Book II. Chapters vii. to xii. 273

Book III. Chapters i. to xii. 407

Book III. Chapters xiii. to xxvii. 542

Murder Market, The, 126

New Tales by Miss Martineau--The Old Governess, 163

Novelist's Appeal for the Canadas, A, 443

Old Times in New-York, 320

Osgood, The late Mrs.--_By Rufus W. Griswold_, 131

Paris Fashions for December. (Illustrated.) 144

" " January. (Illustrated.) 286

" " February. (Illustrated.) 431

" " March. (Illustrated.) 567

Peace Society, The First, 321

Penn, (William,) and Macaulay, 336

Pleasant Story of a Swallow, 123

Poet's Lot, The.--_By the author of "Festus,"_ 45

Power's, Hiram, Greek Slave.--_By Elizabeth Barret Browning_, 88

Poems by S.G. Goodrich, A Biographical Review. (Illustrated.) 153

Public Libraries, Ancient and Modern, 359

Recent Deaths in the Family of Orleans, 122

Reminiscences of Paganini, 167

Responsibility of Statesmen, 127

Rossini in the Kitchen, 321

Scandalous French Dances in American Parlors, 333

_Scientific Miscellany._--Hydraulic Experiments in Paris,

430.--French Populations, 430.--African Exploring Expedition,

430.--The Hungarian Academy, 430.--Gas from Water, &c., 430.--The

French "Annuaire," 573.--Sittings of the Academy of Sciences,

573.--New Scientific Publications, 574.--Sir David Brewster, 574.

Sir Nicholas at Marston Moor.--_By Winthrop M. Praed_, 80

Sliding Scale of Inconsolables. From the French, 162

Smiths, The Two Miss.--_By Mrs. Crowe_, 76

Song of the Season.--_By Charles Mackay_, 128

Sounds from Home.--_By Alice G. Neal_, 332

Spencer, Aubrey George, LL.D., Bishop of Jamaica, 157

Spirit of the English Annuals for 1851, 197

Stanzas.--_By Alfred Tennyson_, 273

Statues.--_By Walter Savage Landor_, 126

Story Without a Name, A.--_By G.P.R. James_, 32

" " Chapters vi. to ix. 205

" " Chapters x. to xiii. 337

" " Chapters xiv. to xvii. 482

Story of Calais, A.--_By Richard B. Kimball_, 231

Story of a Poet, 88

Swift, Dean, and his Amours. (Illustrated.) 7

Temper of Women, 437

Theatrical Criticism in the Last Age, 334

To a Celebrated Singer.--_By R.H. Stoddard_, 86

To one in Affliction.--_By G.R. Thompson_, 541

Troost, of Tennessee, The Late Dr. 332

Twickenham Ghost, The, 60

Valetudinarian, The Confirmed.--_By Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton_, 203

Vampire, The Last.--_By Mrs. Crowe_, 107

Voltigeur.--_By W.H. Thackeray_, 197

Voisenen, The Abbe de, and his Times, 511

Wane of the Year, The, 129

Webster, LL.D., Horace, and the Free Academy. (Portrait.) 444

Wearing the Beard.--_Dr. Marcy_, 130

Wiseman, Dr., Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster (Illustrated.) 143

Wild Sports in Algeria.--_By Jules Gerard_, 121

Wolf Chase, The.--_By C. Whitehead_, 86

[Illustration: _C.B. Haddock_]

THE INTERNATIONAL MAGAZINE

of Literature, Art, and Science.

Vol. II. NEW YORK, DECEMBER 1, 1850. No. I.

OUR DIPLOMATIC SERVANTS.

CHARLES B. HADDOCK,

CHARGE D'AFFAIRES FOR PORTUGAL.

[With a Portrait, Engraved by J. Andrews.]

Old notions of diplomacy are obsolete. The plain, straightforward, and

masterly manner in which Daniel Webster and Lord Ashburton managed the

difficult affairs which a few years ago threatened war between this

country and England have taught mankind a useful lesson on this subject.

We perceive that the London _Times_ has been engaged in a controversy

whether there should be diplomatists or no diplomatists, whether, in

fact, the profession should survive; arguing from this case conducted by

our illustrious Secretary and Lord Ashburton, that negotiation in

foreign countries is plain sailing for great men, and that common agents

would do the necessary business on ordinary occasions. We are not

prepared to accept the doctrine of the _Times_, though ready enough to

admit that it is to be preferred to the employment of such persons as

many whom we have sent abroad in the last twenty years--many who now in

various capacities represent the United States in foreign countries.

Upon this question however we do not propose now to enter. It is one

which may be deferred still a long time--until the means of

intercommunication shall be greater than steam and electricity have yet

made them, or until the evils of unworthy representation shall have

driven people to the possible dangers of an abandonment of the system

without such a reason. We design in this and future numbers of the

_International_ simply to give a few brief personal sketches of the most

honorably distinguished of the diplomatic servants of the United States

now abroad, and we commence with the newly-appointed _Charge d'Affaires_

to Lisbon.

Charles Brickett Haddock was born at Salisbury (now Franklin), New

Hampshire, on the 20th of June, 1796. His father, William Haddock, was a

native of Haverhill, Massachusetts. His paternal grandfather removed

from Boston to Haverhill, and married a sister of Dr. Charles Brickett,

an eminent physician of that town. The family, according to a tradition

among them, are descended from Admiral Sir Richard Haddocke, one of ten

sons and eleven daughters of Mr. Haddocke, of Lee, in England. Richard

Haddocke was an eminent officer in the Royal Navy. He was knighted

before 1678, and returned a member of Parliament the same year, and

again in 1685. He died in 1713, and was buried in the family vault at

Lee, where there is a gravestone, with brass plates on which are

engraved portraits of his father, his father's three wives, and thirteen

sons and eleven daughters.

The mother of Dr. Haddock was Abigail Webster, a favorite sister of

Ezekiel and Daniel Webster, who, with Sarah, were the only children of

the Hon. Ebenezer Webster by his second wife, Abigail Eastman, who

survived her husband and all her daughters. Mrs. Haddock was a woman of

strong character, and greatly beloved in society. She died in December,

1805, at the age of twenty-seven, leaving two sons, Charles and William,

one about nine and the other seven years of age. Her last words to her

husband were, "I leave you two beautiful boys: my wish is that you

should educate them both." The injunction was not forgotten; both were

in due time placed at a preparatory school in Salisbury, both entered

Dartmouth College, and without an academic censure or reproof graduated

with distinction.

The younger, having studied the profession of the law, married a

daughter of Mills Olcott, of Hanover, and after a few years, rich in

promise of professional eminence, died of consumption at Hanover, in

1835.

The elder, Charles B. Haddock, was born in the house in which his

grandfather first lived, after he removed to the river, in Franklin;

though his childhood was chiefly spent at Elms Farms, in the mansion

built by his father, and now the favorite residence of his uncle, Daniel

Webster,--a spot hardly equaled for picturesque and tranquil beauty in

that part of New England. How much of his rural tastes and gentle

feelings the professor owes to the place of his nativity it is not for

us to determine. It is certain that a fitter scene to inspire the

sentiments for which he is distinguished, and which he delights to

refresh by frequent visits to these scenes, could not well be imagined.

Every hill and valley, every rock and eddy, seem to be familiar to him,

and to have a legend for his heart. His earliest distinct recollections,

he has often been heard to say, are the burial of a sister younger than

himself, his own baptism at the bedside of his dying mother, and the

death of his grandfather; and the first things that awakened a romantic

emotion were the flight of the night-hawk and the note of the

whippoorwill, both uncommonly numerous and noticeable there in summer

evenings.

From 1807 he was in the academy during the summer months, and attended

the common school in winter, until 1811, when, in his sixteenth year, he

taught his own first winter school. It had been his fortune to have as

instructors persons destined to unusual eminence: Mr. Richard Fletcher,

now one of the justices of the Superior Court of Massachusetts; Justice

Willard, of Springfield; the Rev. Edward L. Parker, of Londonderry; and

Nathaniel H. Carter, the well-known poet and general writer. It was

under Mr. Carter that he first felt a genuine love of learning; and he

has always ascribed more of his literary tastes, to his insensible

influence, as he read to him Virgil and Cicero, than to any other living

teacher. His earliest Latin book was the AEneid, over the first half of

which he had, summer after summer, fatigued and vexed himself, before

the idea occurred to him that it was an epic poem; and that idea came to

him at length not from his teachers, but from a question of his uncle,

Daniel Webster, about the descent of the hero into the infernal regions.

When a proper impression of its design was once formed, and some

familiarity with the language was acquired, Virgil was run through with

great rapidity: half a book in a day. So also with Cicero: an oration at

a lesson. There was no verbal accuracy acquired or attempted; but a

ready mastery of the current of discourse--a familiarity with the point

and spirit of the work. In August, 1812, he was admitted a freshman in

Dartmouth College. It was a small class, but remarkable from having

produced a large number of eminent men, among whom we may mention George

A. Simmons, a distinguished lawyer in northern New York, and one of the

profoundest philosophers in this country; Dr. Absalom Peters; President

Wheeler, of the University of Vermont; Governor Hubbard, of Maine; and

Professor Joseph Torrey, of the University of Vermont, since so

honorably known as the learned translator of Neander, and as being

without a superior among American scholars in a knowledge of the

profounder German literature. The late illustrious and venerated Dr.

James Marsh, the editor of Coleridge, and the only pupil of that great

metaphysician who was the peer of his master, was of the class below

his, and was an intimate companion in study.

From the beginning of his college life it was his ambition to

distinguish himself. By the general consent of his classmates, and by

the appointment of the faculty, he held the first place at each public

exhibition through the four years in which he was a student, and at the

last commencement was complimented with having the order of the parts,

according to which the Latin salutatory had hitherto been first, so

changed that he might still have precedence and yet have the English

valedictory. During his junior year, his mind was first decidedly turned

toward religion, and with Wheeler, Torrey, Marsh, and some forty others,

he made a public profession. The two years after he left college were

spent at Andover, in the study of divinity. While here, with Torrey,

Wheeler, Marsh, and one or two more, he joined in a critical reading of

Virgil--an exercise of great value in enlarging a command of his own

language, as well as his knowledge of Latin. At the close of the second

year he was attacked with hemorrhage of the lungs, and advised to try a

southern climate for the winter. He sailed in October, 1818, for

Charleston, and spent the winter in that city and in Savannah, with

occasional visits into the surrounding country. The following summer he

traveled, chiefly on horseback, and in company with the Rev. Pliny Fisk,

from Charleston home. To this tour he ascribes his recovery. He soon

after took his master's degree, and was appointed the first Professor of

Rhetoric and Belles-Lettres in Dartmouth College. From that time a

change was obvious in the literary spirit of the instruction given at

the institution. The department to which he was called became very soon

the most attractive in the college, and some of the most distinguished

orators of our country are pleased to admit that they obtained their

first impressions of true eloquence and a correct style from the

youthful professor. He introduced readings in the Scriptures, and in

Shakspeare, Milton, and Young, with original criticisms by his pupils on

particular features of the principal works of genius, as the hell of

Virgil, Dante, and Milton; and the prominent characters of the best

tragedies, as the Jew of Cumberland and of Shakspeare; and

extemporaneous discussions of aesthetical and political questions, as

upon the authenticity of Ossian, the authorship of Homer, the sincerity

of Cromwell, or the expediency of the execution of Charles. He also

exerted his influence in founding an association for familiar written

and oral discussions in literature, in which Dr. Edward Oliver, Dr.

James Marsh, Professor Fiske, Mr. Rufus Choate, Professor Chamberlain,

and others, acted a prominent part.

He retained this chair until August, 1838, when he was appointed to that

of Intellectual Philosophy and Political Economy, which he now holds,

but, which, of course, will be occupied by another during his absence in

the public service--the faculty having declined on any account to accept

his resignation or to appoint a successor.

Dr. Haddock has been invited to the professorship of rhetoric in

Hamilton College, and to the presidency of that institution, the

presidency and a professorship in the Auburn Theological Seminary, the

presidency of Bowdoin College, and, less formally, to that of several

other colleges in New England.

In public affairs, he has for four successive years been a

representative in the New Hampshire Legislature, and in this period was

active in introducing the present common school system of the State, and

was the first commissioner of common schools, originating the course of

action in that important office which has since been pursued. He was one

of the fathers of the railroad system in New Hampshire, and his various

speeches had the effect to change the policy of the State on this

subject. He addressed the first convention called at Lebanon to consider

the practicability of a road across the State, and afterward a similar

convention at Montpelier. For two years he lectured every Sabbath

evening to the students and to the people of the village, on the

historical portions of the New Testament. For several years he held

weekly meetings for the interpretation of Scripture, in which the ladies

of the village met at his house. And for twenty years he has constantly

preached to vacant parishes in the vicinity. He has delivered

anniversary orations before the Phi Beta Kappa Societies of Dartmouth

and Yale, the Rhetorical Societies of Andover and Bangor, the Religious

Society of the University of Vermont, the New Hampshire Historical

Society, and the New England Society of New York; numerous lyceum

lectures, in Boston, Lowell, Salem, Portsmouth, Manchester, New Bedford,

and other places; and of the New Hampshire Education Society he was

twelve or fifteen years secretary, publishing annual reports. The

principal periodicals to which he has contributed are the _Biblical

Repository_ and the _Bibliotheca Sacra_. A volume of his _Addresses and

Miscellaneous Writings_ was published in 1846, and he has now a work on

rhetoric in preparation.

He has been twice married--the last time to a sister of Mr. Kimball, the

author of "St. Leger," &c. He has three children living, and has buried

seven.

In agriculture, gardening, and public improvements of all kinds, he has

taken a lively interest. The rural ornaments of the town in which he

lives owe much to him. He may be said to have introduced the fruit and

horticulture which are now becoming so abundant as luxuries, and so

remarkable as ornaments of the village.

In 1843 he received the degree of D.D. from Bowdoin College. Of

Dartmouth College nearly half the graduates are his pupils. While

commissioner of common schools, he published a series of letters to

teachers and students which were more generally republished in the

various papers of the country than anything else of the kind ever before

written. Perhaps no one in this country has discussed so great a variety

of subjects. His essays upon the proper standard of education for the

pulpit, addresses on the utility of certain proposed lines of railway,

orations on the duties of the citizen to the state, lectures before

various medical societies, speeches in the New Hampshire House of

Representatives, letters written while commissioner of common schools,

contributions to periodicals, addresses before a great variety of

literary associations, writings on agriculture and gardening, yearly

reports on education, lectures on classical learning, rhetoric and

belles-lettres, and sermons, delivered weekly for more than twenty

years, illustrate a life of remarkable activity, and dedicated to the

best interests of mankind. Unmoved by the calls of ambition, which might

have tempted him to some one great and engrossing effort, his aim has

been the general good of the people.

The following extract from the dedication, to his pupils, of his

_Addresses and Miscellaneous Writings_, evinces something of his

purpose:

"It is now five-and-twenty years since I adopted the resolution never to

refuse to attempt anything consistent with my professional duties, in

the cause of learning, or religion, which I might be invited to do. This

resolution I have not at any time regretted, and perhaps I may say, I

have not essentially violated it. However this may be, I have never

suffered from want of something to do."

Professor Haddock's style is remarkable for purity and correctness. His

sentences are all finished sentences, never subject to an injurious

verbal criticism, without a mistake of any kind, or a grammatical error.

We have not written of Dr. Haddock as a politician; but he is a

thoroughly informed statesman, profoundly versed in public law, and

familiar with all the policy and aims of the American government. He is

of course a Whig. He has been educated, politically, in the school of

his illustrious uncle, and probably no man living is more thoroughly

acquainted with Mr. Webster's views, or more capable of their

application in affairs. It is therefore eminently suitable that he

should be on the list of our representatives abroad, while the foreign

department is under Mr. Webster's administration. The Whig party in New

Hampshire have not been insensible of Dr. Haddock's surpassing

abilities, of his sagacity, or his merits. Could they have done so, they

would have made him Governor, or a senator in Congress, on any of the

occasions in many years in which such officers have been chosen.

Considered without reference to party, we can think of no gentleman in

the country who would be likely to represent the United States more

worthily at foreign courts, or who by his capacities, suavity of manner,

or honorable nature, would make a more pleasing and desirable impression

upon the most highly cultivated society. Those who know him well will

assent to the justness of a classification which places him in the same

list of intellectual diplomats which embraces Bunsen, Guizot, and our

own Everett, Irving, Bancroft and Marsh.

[Illustration: No. I.--WINGED HUMAN-HEADED BULL.]

DR. LAYARD'S RECENT GIFTS FROM NIMROUD.

The researches of no antiquary or traveler in modern times have excited

so profound an interest as those of Austen Henry Layard, who has

summoned the kings and people of Nineveh through three thousand years to

give their testimony against the skeptics of our age in support of the

divine revelation. In a former number of _The International_ we

presented an original and very interesting letter from Dr. Layard

himself, upon the nature and bearing of his discoveries. Since then he

has sent to London, where they have arrived in safety, several of the

most important sculptures described in his work republished here last

year by Mr. Putnam. Among them are the massive and imposing statues of a

human-headed bull and a human-headed lion, of which we have engravings

in some of the London journals. The _Illustrated London News_ describes

these specimens of ancient art as follows:

"No. I. is the Human-Headed and Eagle-Winged Bull. This animal would

seem to bear some analogy to the Egyptian sphynx, which represents the

head of the King upon the body of the lion, and is held by some to be

typical of the union of intellectual power with physical strength. The

sphynx of the Egyptians, however, is invariably sitting, whereas the

Nimroud figure is always represented standing. The apparent resemblance

being so great, it is at least worthy of consideration whether the head

on the winged animals of the Ninevites may not be that of the King, and

the intention identical with that of the sphynx; though we think it more

probable that there is no such connection, and that the intention of the

Ninevites was to typify their god under the common emblems of

intelligence, strength and swiftness, as signified by the additional

attributes of the bird. The specimen immediately before us is of gypsum,

and of colossal dimensions, the slab being ten feet square by two feet

in thickness. It was situated at the entrance of a chamber, being built

into the side of the door, so that one side and a front view only could

be seen by the spectator. Accordingly, the Ninevite sculptor, in order

to make both views perfect, has given the animal five legs. The four

seen in the side view show the animal in the act of walking; while, to

render the representation complete in the front view, he has repeated

the right fore leg again, but in the act of standing motionless. The

countenance is noble and benevolent in expression; the features are of

true Persian type; he wears an egg-shaped cap, with three horns and a

cord round the base of it. The hair at the back of the head has seven

ranges of curls; and the beard, as in the portraits of the King, is

divided into three ranges of curls, with intervals of wavy hair. In the

ears, which are those of a bull, are pendent ear-rings. The whole of the

dewlap is covered with tiers of curls, and four rows are continued

beneath the ribs along the whole flank; on the back are six rows of

curls, and upon the haunch a square bunch, ranged successively, and down

the back of the thigh four rows. The hair at the end of the tail is

curled like the beard, with intervals of wavy hair. The hair at the knee

joints is likewise curled, terminating in the profile views of the limbs

in a single curl of the kind (if we may use the term) called _croche

coeur_. The elaborately sculptured wings extend over the back of the

animal to the very verge of the slab. All the flat surface of the slab

is covered with cuneiform inscription; there being twenty-two lines

between the fore legs, twenty-one lines in the middle, nineteen lines

between the hind legs, and forty-seven lines between the tail and the

edge of the slab. The whole of this slab is unbroken, with the exception

of the fore-feet, which arrived in a former importation, but which are

now restored to their proper place.

[Illustration: No. II.--WINGED HUMAN-HEADED LION.]

"No. II. represents the Human-Headed and Winged Lion--nine feet long,

and the same in height; and in purpose and position the same as the

preceding, which, however, it does not quite equal in execution. In this

relievo we have the same head, with the egg-shaped three-horned

head-dress, exactly like that of the bull; but the ear is human, and not

that of a lion. The beard and hair of the head are even yet more

elaborately curled than the last; but the hair on the legs and sides of

the animal represents that shaggy appendage of the animal. Round the

loins is a succession of numerous cords, which are drawn into four

separate knots; at the extremities are fringes, forming as many distinct

tassels. At the end of the tail, the claw--on which we commented in a

former article--is distinctly visible. The strength of both animals is

admirably and characteristically conveyed. Upon the flat surface of this

slab, as in the last, is a cuneiform inscription; twenty lines being

between the fore legs, twenty-six in the middle, eighteen between the

hind legs, and seventy-one at the back."

On the subject of Eastern languages, an understanding of which is

necessary to the just apprehension of these inscriptions, that most

acute antiquary, Major Rawlinson, remarks:

"My own impression is that hundreds of the languages at one time current

through Asia are now utterly lost; and it is not, therefore, to be

expected that philologists or ethnologists will ever succeed in making

out a genealogical table of language, and in affiliating all the various

dialects. Coming to the Assyrian and Babylonian languages, we were first

made acquainted with them as translations of the Persian and Parthian

documents in the trilingual inscriptions of Persia; but lately we have

had an enormous amount of historical matter brought to light in tablets

of stone written in these languages alone. The languages in question I

certainly consider to be Semitic. I doubt whether we could trace at

present in any of the buildings or inscriptions of Assyria and Babylonia

the original primitive civilization of man--that civilization which took

place in the very earliest ages. I am of opinion that civilization first

showed itself in Egypt after the immigration of the early tribes from

Asia. I think that the human intellect first germinated on the Nile, and

that then there was, in a later age, a reflux of civilization from the

Nile back to Asia. I am quite satisfied that the system of writing in

use on the Tigris and Euphrates was taken from the Nile; but I admit

that it was carried to a much higher state of perfection in Assyria than

it had ever reached in Egypt. The earliest Assyrian inscriptions were

those lately discovered by Mr. Layard in the north-west Palace at

Nimroud, being much earlier than anything found at Babylon. Now, the

great question is the date of these inscriptions. Mr. Layard himself,

when he published his book on Nineveh, believed them to be 2500 years

before the Christian era; but others, and Dr. Hincks among the number,

brought them down to a much later date, supposing the historical tablets

to refer to the Assyrian kings mentioned in Scripture--(Shalmaneser,

Sennacherib, &c.). I do not agree with either one of these calculations

or the other. I am inclined to place the earliest inscriptions from

Nimroud between 1350 and 1200 before the Christian era; because, in the

first place, they had a limit to antiquity; for in the earliest

inscriptions there was a notice of the seaports of Phoenicia, of Tyre

and Sidon, of Byblus, Arcidus, &c.; and it was well known that these

cities were not founded more than 1500 years before the Christian era.

We have every prospect of a most important accession to our materials,

for every letter I get from the countries now being explored announces

fresh discoveries of the utmost importance. In Lower Chaldea, Mr.

Loftus, the geologist to the commission appointed to fix the boundaries

between Turkey and Persia, has visited many cities which no European had

ever reached before, and has everywhere found the most extraordinary

remains. At one place (Senkereh) he had come on a pavement, extending

from half an acre to an acre, entirely covered with writing, which was

engraved upon baked tiles, &c. At Wurka (or Ur of the Chaldees), whence

Abraham came out, he had found innumerable inscriptions; they were of no

great extent, but they were exceedingly interesting, giving many royal

names previously unknown. Wurka (Ur or Orchoe) seemed to be a holy city,

for the whole country, for miles upon miles, was nothing but a huge

necropolis. In none of the excavations of Assyria had coffins ever been

found, but in this city of Chaldea there were thousands upon thousands.

The story of Abraham's birth at Wurka did not originate with the Arabs,

as had sometimes been conjectured, but with the Jews; and the Orientals

had numberless fables about Abraham and Nimroud. Mr. Layard in

excavating beneath the great pyramid at Nimroud, had penetrated a mass

of masonry, within which he _had discovered the tomb and statue of_

Sardanapalus, accompanied by full annals of the monarch's reign engraved

on the walls! He had also found tablets of all sorts, all of them being

historical; but the crowning discovery he had yet to describe. The

palace at Nineveh, or Koynupih, had evidently been destroyed by fire,

but one portion of the building seemed to have escaped its influence;

and Mr. Layard, in excavating in this part of the palace, had found a

large room filled with what appeared to be the archives of the empire,

ranged in successive tablets of terra cotta, the writings being as

perfect as when the tablets were first stamped. They were piled in huge

heaps from the floor to the ceiling. From the progress already made in

reading the inscriptions, I believe we shall be able pretty well to

understand the contents of these tablets; at all events, we shall

ascertain their general purport, and thus gain much valuable

information. A passage might be remembered in the book of Ezra where the

Jews, having been disturbed in building the Temple, prayed that search

might be made in the house of records for the edict of Cyrus permitting

them to return to Jerusalem. The chamber recently found there might be

presumed to be the house of records of the Assyrian kings, where copies

of the royal edicts were duly deposited. When these tablets have been

examined and deciphered, I believe that we shall have a better

acquaintance with the history, the religion, the philosophy, and the

jurisprudence of Assyria, 1500 years before the Christian era, than we

have of Greece or Rome during any period of their respective histories."

Besides the gigantic figures of which we have copied engravings in the

preceding pages, Dr. Layard has sent to the British Museum a large

number of other sculptures, some of which are still more interesting for

the light they reflect upon ancient Assyrian history. For these, as for

the Grecian marbles and Egyptian antiquities, a special gallery is being

fitted up.

[Illustration: JONATHAN SWIFT.]

DEAN SWIFT'S CHARACTER AND HIS AMOURS.

The name of Swift is one of the most familiar in English history. Of the

twenty octavo volumes in which his works are printed, only a part of one

volume is read; but this part of a volume is read by everybody, and

admired by everybody, though singularly enough not one in a thousand

ever thinks of its real import, or appreciates it for what are and what

were meant to be its highest excellences. As the author of "Gulliver's

Travels," Swift is a subject of general interest; and this interest is

deepened, but scarcely diffused, by the chain of enigmas which has

puzzled so many of his biographers.

The most popular life of Dean Swift is Mr. Roscoe's, but since that was

written several works have appeared, either upon his whole history or in

elucidation of particular portions of it: one of which was a careful

investigation and discussion of his madness, published about two years

ago. In the last number of _The International_ we mentioned the curious

novel of "Stella and Vanessa," in which a Frenchman has this year

essayed his defense against the common judgment in the matter of his

amours, and we copy in the following pages an article from the London

_Times_, which was suggested by this performance.

M. De Wailly's "Stella and Vanessa" is unquestionably a very ingenious

and brilliant fiction--in every sense only a fiction--for its hypotheses

are all entirely erroneous. Even Mr. Roscoe, whose Memoir has been

called an elaborate apology, and who, as might have been expected from a

man of so amiable and charitable a character, labors to put the best

construction upon all Swift's actions,--even he shrinks from the

vindication of the Dean's conduct toward Miss Vanhomrigh and Mrs.

Johnson. In treating of the charges which are brought against Swift

while he was alive, or that have since been urged against his

reputation, the elegant historian calls to his aid every palliating

circumstance; and where no palliating circumstances are to be found,

seeks to enlist our benevolent feelings in behalf of a man deeply

unfortunate, persecuted by his enemies, neglected by his friends, and

haunted all his life by the presentiment of a fearful calamity, by which

at length in his extreme old age he was assaulted and overwhelmed. On

some points Mr. Roscoe must be said to have succeeded in this advocacy,

so honorable alike to him and to its subject; but the more serious

charges against Swift remain untouched, and probably will forever remain

so, by whatever ability, or eloquence, or generous partiality, combated.

To speak plainly, Swift was an irredeemably bad man, devoured by vanity

and selfishness, and so completely dead to every elevated and manly

feeling, that he was always ready to sacrifice those most devotedly

attached to him for the gratification of his unworthy passion for power

and notoriety.

Swift's life, though dark and turbulent, was nevertheless romantic. He

concealed the repulsive odiousness of an unfeeling heart under manners

peculiarly fascinating, which conciliated not only the admiration and

attachment of more than one woman, but likewise the friendship of

several eminent men, who were too much dazzled by the splendor of his

conversation to detect the base qualities which existed in the

background. But these circumstances only enhance the interest of his

life. At every page there is some discussion which strongly interests

our feelings: some difficulty to be removed, some mystery to keep alive

curiosity. We neither know, strictly speaking, who Swift was, what were

the influences which raised him to the position he occupied, by what

intricate ties he was connected with Stella, or what was the nature of

that singular grief, which, in addition to the sources of sorrow to

which we have alluded, preyed on him continually, and at last

contributed largely to the overthrow of his reason. On this account it

is not possible to proceed with indifference through the circumstances

of his life, though very few careful examiners will be able to interpret

them in a lenient and charitable spirit.

Mr. Roscoe appears to believe that everybody who regards unfavorably

Swift's genius and morals, must be actuated by envy or party spirit, but

very few of the later or earlier critics are of his opinion. In the

first place, most honorable men would rather remain unknown through

eternity than accept the Dean's reputation. As Savage Landor says, he

was "irreverential to the great and to God: an ill-tempered, sour,

supercilious man, who flattered some of the worst and maligned some of

the best men that ever lived." Whatever services he performed for the

party from which he apostatized, there is nothing in his more permanent

writings which can be of the slightest advantage to English toryism.

Indeed, in politics and in morals, he appears never to have had any

fixed principles. He served the party which he thought most likely to

make him a bishop, and deserted it when he discovered that it was losing

ground. He studied government not as a statesman but as a partisan, as a

hardy, active, and unscrupulous Swiss, who could and would do much dirty

work for a minister, if he saw reason to anticipate a liberal

compensation. He however always extravagantly exaggerated his own

powers, and so have his biographers, and so has the writer of the

following article from _The Times_, who seems to have accepted with too

little scrutiny the estimate he made of himself. The complacency with

which he frequently refers to his supposed influence over the ministers

is simply ludicrous. He entirely loses sight of both his own position

and theirs. Shrewd as he shows himself under other circumstances, he is

here as verdant as the greenest peasant from the forest. "I use the

ministers like dogs," he says in a letter to Stella, but in reality the

ministers made a dog of him, employing him to fetch and carry, and bark,

and growl, and show his sharp teeth to their enemies; and when the noise

he had made had served their purpose,--when he had frightened away many

of their assailants, and by the dirt and stench he had raised had

compelled even their friends to stand aloof, they cashiered him, as they

would a mastiff grown toothless and incapable of barking. With no more

dirty work for him to do, they sent him over to Dublin, to be rid of his

presence.

When fairly settled down in a country which he had always hitherto

affected at least to detest, he began to feel perhaps some genuine

attachment for its people, and on many occasions he exerted himself

vigorously for their advantage; though it is possible that the real

impulse was a desire to vex and embarrass the administration, which had

so galled his self-conceit. Whatever the motive, however, he undoubtedly

worked industriously and with great effect, for the benefit of Ireland.

His style was calculated to be popular: it was simple, transparent, and

though copious, pointed and energetic. His pamphlets, in the midst of

their reasoning, sarcasm, and solemn banter, displayed an extent, a

variety and profundity of knowledge altogether unequaled in the case of

any other writer of that time. But the action of his extraordinary

powers was never guided by a spark of honorable principle. The giant was

as unscrupulous as the puniest and basest demagogue who coined and

scattered lies for our own last election. He would seem to be the model

whom half a dozen of our city editors were striving with weaker wing to

imitate. He never acknowledged any merit in his antagonists, he

scattered his libels right and left without mercy, threw out of sight

all the charities and even decencies of private life, and affirmed the

most monstrous propositions with so cool, calm and solemn an air, that

in nine cases out of ten they were sure to be believed.

Without further observation we proceed with the interesting article of

_The Times_, occasioned by M. Leon de Wailly's curious and very clever

romance of "Stella and Vanessa."

[Illustration: "VANESSA." (MISS VANHOMRIGH.)]

[From the London Times.]

THE AMOURS OF DEAN SWIFT.

Greater men than Dean Swift may have lived. A more remarkable man never

left his impress upon the age immortalized by his genius. To say that

English history supplies no narrative more singular and original than

the career of Jonathan Swift is to assert little. We doubt whether the

histories of the world can furnish, for example and instruction, for

wonder and pity, for admiration and scorn, for approval and

condemnation, a specimen of humanity at once so illustrious and so

small. Before the eyes of his contemporaries Swift stood a living

enigma. To posterity he must continue forever a distressing puzzle. One

hypothesis--and one alone--gathered from a close and candid perusal of

all that has been transmitted to us upon this interesting subject, helps

us to account for a whole life of anomaly, but not to clear up the

mystery in which it is shrouded. From the beginning to the end of his

days Jonathan Swift was more or less MAD.

Intellectually and morally, physically and religiously, Dean Swift was a

mass of contradictions. His career yields ample materials both for the

biographer who would pronounce a panegyric over his tomb and for the

censor whose business it is to improve one generation at the expense of

another. Look at Swift with the light of intelligence shining on his

brow, and you note qualities that might become an angel. Survey him

under the dark cloud, and every feature is distorted into that of a

fiend. If we tell the reader what he was, in the same breath we shall

communicate all that he was not. His virtues were exaggerated into

vices, and his vices were not without the savour of virtue. The

originality of his writings is of a piece with the singularity of his

character. He copied no man who preceded him. He has not been

successfully imitated by any who have followed him. The compositions of

Swift reveal the brilliancy of sharpened wit, yet it is recorded of the

man that he was never known to laugh. His friendships were strong and

his antipathies vehement and unrelenting, yet he illustrated friendship

by roundly abusing his familiars and expressed hatred by bantering his

foes. He was economical and saving to a fault, yet he made sacrifices to

the indigent and poor sternly denied to himself. He could begrudge the

food and wine consumed by a guest, yet throughout his life refuse to

derive the smallest pecuniary advantage from his published works, and at

his death bequeath the whole of his fortune to a charitable institution.

From his youth Swift was a sufferer in body, yet his frame was vigorous,

capable of great endurance, and maintained its power and vitality from

the time of Charles II. until far on in the reign of the second George.

No man hated Ireland more than Swift, yet he was Ireland's first and

greatest patriot, bravely standing up for the rights of that kingdom

when his chivalry might have cost him his head. He was eager for reward,

yet he refused payment with disdain. Impatient of advancement, he

preferred to the highest honors the State could confer the obscurity and

ignominy of the political associates with whom he had affectionately

labored until they fell disgraced. None knew better than he the stinging

force of a successful lampoon, yet such missiles were hurled by hundreds

at his head without in any way disturbing his bodily tranquillity.

Sincerely religious, scrupulously attentive to the duties of his holy

office, vigorously defending the position and privileges of his order,

he positively played into the hands of infidelity by the steps he took,

both in his conduct and writings, to expose the cant and hypocrisy which

he detested as heartily as he admired and practiced unaffected piety. To

say that Swift lacked tenderness would be to forget many passages of his

unaccountable history that overflow with gentleness of spirit and mild

humanity; but to deny that he exhibited inexcusable brutality where the

softness of his nature ought to have been chiefly evoked--where the want

of tenderness, indeed, left him a naked and irreclaimable savage--is

equally impossible. If we decline to pursue the contradictory series

further, it is in pity to the reader, not for want of materials at

command. There is, in truth, no end to such materials.

Swift was born in the year 1667. His father, who was steward to the

Society of the King's Inn, Dublin, died before his birth and left his

widow penniless. The child, named Jonathan after his father, was brought

up on charity. The obligation due to an uncle was one that Swift would

never forget, or remember without inexcusable indignation. Because he

had not been left to starve by his relatives, or because his uncle would

not do more than he could, Swift conceived an eternal dislike to all who

bore his name and a haughty contempt for all who partook of his nature.

He struggled into active life and presented himself to his fellow-men in

the temper of a foe. At the age of fourteen he was admitted into Trinity

College, Dublin, and four years afterward as _a special grace_--for his

acquisitions apparently failed to earn the distinction--the degree of

Bachelor of Arts was conferred upon him. In 1688, the year in which the

war broke out in Ireland, Swift, in his twenty-first year, and without a

sixpence in his pocket, left college. Fortunately for him, the wife of

Sir William Temple was related to his mother, and upon her application

to that statesman the friendless youth was provided with a home. He took

up his abode with Sir William in England, and for the space of two years

labored hard at his own improvement and for the amusement of his patron.

How far Swift succeeded in winning the good opinion of Sir William may

be learnt from the fact that when King William honored Moor Park with

his presence he was permitted to take part in the interviews, and that

when Sir William was unable to visit the King his _protege_ was

commissioned to wait upon His Majesty, and to speak on the patron's

authority and behalf. The lad's future promised better things than his

beginning. He resolved to go into the church, since preferment stared

him in the face. In 1692 he proceeded to Oxford, where he obtained his

Master's degree, and in 1694, quarreling with Sir William Temple, who

coldly offered him a situation worth L100 a year, he quitted his patron

in disgust and went at once to Ireland to take holy orders. He was

ordained, and almost immediately afterward received the living of

Kilroot in the diocese of Connor, the value of the living being about

equal to that of the appointment offered by Sir William Temple.

Swift, miserable in his exile, sighed for the advantages he had

abandoned. Sir William Temple, lonely without his clever and keen-witted

companion, pined for his return. The prebend of Kilroot was speedily

resigned in favor of a poor curate for whom Swift had taken great pains

to procure the presentation; and with L80 in his purse the independent

clergyman proceeded once more to Moor Park. Sir William welcomed him

with open arms. They resided together until 1699, when the great

statesman died, leaving to Swift, in testimony of his regard, the sum of

L100 and his literary remains. The remains were duly published and

humbly dedicated to the King. They might have been inscribed to His

Majesty's cook for any advantage that accrued to the editor. Swift was a

Whig, but his politics suffered severely by the neglect of His Majesty,

who derived no particular advantage from Sir William Temple's "remains."

Weary with long and vain attendance upon Court, Swift finally accepted

at the hands of Lord Berkeley, one of the Lords Justices of Ireland, the

rectory of Agher and the vicarages of Laracor and Rathbeggan. In the

year 1700 he took possession of the living at Laracor, and his mode of

entering upon his duty was thoroughly characteristic of the man. He

walked down to Laracor, entered the curate's house, and announced

himself "as his master." In his usual style he affected brutality, and

having sufficiently alarmed his victims, gradually soothed and consoled

them by evidences of undoubted friendliness and good will. "This," says

Sir Walter Scott, "was the ruling trait of Swift's character to others;

his praise assumed the appearance and language of complaint; his

benefits were often prefaced by a prologue of a threatening nature."

"The ruling trait" of Swift's character was morbid eccentricity. Much

less eccentricity has saved many a murderer in our days from the

gallows. We approach a period of Swift's history when we must accept

this conclusion or revolt from the cold-blooded doings of a monster.

During Swift's second residence with Sir William Temple he had become

acquainted with an inmate of Moor Park very different to the

accomplished man to whose intellectual pleasures he so largely

ministered. A young and lovely girl--half ward, half dependent in the

establishment--engaged the attention and commanded the untiring services

of the newly-made minister. Esther Johnson had need of education, and

Swift became her tutor. He entered upon his task with avidity,

condescended to the humblest instruction, and inspired his pupil with

unbounded gratitude and regard. Swift was not more insensible to the

simplicity and beauty of the lady than she to the kind offices of her

master; but Swift would not have been Swift had he, like other men,

returned everyday love with ordinary affection. Swift had felt tender

impressions in his own fashion before. Once in Leicestershire he was

accused by a friend of having formed an imprudent attachment, on which

occasion he returned for answer, that his "cold temper and unconfined

humor" would prevent all serious consequences, even if it were not true

that the conduct which his friend had mistaken for gallantry had been

merely the evidence "of an active and restless temper, incapable of

enduring idleness, and catching at such opportunities of amusement as

most readily occurred." Upon another occasion, and within four years of

the Leicestershire pastime, Swift made an absolute offer of his hand to

one Miss Waryng, vowing in his declaratory epistle that he would forego

every prospect of interest for the sake of his "Varina," and that "the

lady's love was far more fatal than her cruelty." After much and long

consideration Varina consented to the suit. That was enough for Swift.

He met the capitulation by charging his Varina with want of affection,

by stipulating for unheard-of sacrifices, and concluding with an

expression of his willingness to wed, "_though she had neither fortune_

_nor beauty_," provided every article of his letter was ungrudgingly

agreed to. We may well tremble for Esther Johnson, with her young heart

given into such wild keeping.

[Illustration: "STELLA." (ESTHER JOHNSON.)]

As soon as Swift was established at Laracor it was arranged that Esther,

who possessed a small property in Ireland, should take up her abode near

to her old preceptor. She came, and scandal was silenced by a

stipulation insisted upon by Swift, that his lovely charge should have a

matron for a constant companion, and never see him except in the

presence of a third party. Esther was in her seventeenth year. The vicar

of Laracor was on his road to forty. What wonder that even in Laracor

the former should receive an offer of marriage, and that the latter,

wayward and inconsistent from first to last, should deny another the

happiness he had resolved never to enjoy himself? Esther found a lover

whom Swift repulsed, to the infinite joy of the devoted girl, whose fate

was already linked for good or evil to that of her teacher and friend.

Obscurity and idleness were not for Swift. Love, that gradually consumed

the unoccupied girl, was not even this man's recreation. Impatient of

banishment, he went to London and mixed with the wits of the age.

Addison, Steele, and Arbuthnot became his friends, and he quickly proved

himself worthy of their intimacy by the publication in 1704 of his _Tale

of a Tub_. The success of the work, given to the world anonymously, was

decisive. Its singular merit obtained for its author everlasting renown,

and effectually prevented his rising to the highest dignity in the very

church which his book labored to exalt. None but an inspired madman

would have attempted to do honor to religion in a spirit which none but

the infidel could heartily approve.

Politicians are not squeamish. The Whigs could see no fault in raillery

and wit that might serve temporal interests with greater advantage than

they had advanced interests ecclesiastical; and the friends of the

Revolution welcomed so rare an adherent to their principles. With an

affected ardor that subsequent events proved to be as premature as it

was hollow, Swift's pen was put in harness for his allies, and worked

vigorously enough until 1709, when, having assisted Steele in the

establishment of the _Tatler_, the vicar of Laracor returned to Ireland

and to the duties of a rural pastor. Not to remain, however! A change

suddenly came over the spirit of the nation. Sacheverell was about to

pull down by a single sermon all the popularity that Marlborough and his

friends had built up by their glorious campaigns. Swift had waited in

vain for promotion from the Whigs, and his suspicions were roused when

the Lord-Lieutenant unexpectedly began to caress him. Escaping the

damage which the marked attentions of the old Government might do him

with the new, Swift started for England in 1710, in order to survey the

turning of the political wheel with his own eyes, and to try his fortune

in the game. The progress of events was rapid. Swift reached London on

the 9th of September; on the 1st of October he had already written a

lampoon upon an ancient associate; and on the 4th he was presented to

Harley, the new Minister.

The career of Swift from this moment, and so long as the government of

Harley lasted, was magnificent and mighty. Had he not been crotchety

from his very boyhood, his head would have been turned now. Swift

reigned; Swift was the Government; Swift was Queen, Lords, and Commons.

There was tremendous work to do, and Swift did it all. The Tories had

thrown out the Whigs and had brought in a Government in their place

quite as Whiggish to do Tory work. To moderate the wishes of the people,

if not to blind their eyes, was the preliminary and essential work of

the Ministry. They could not perform it themselves. Swift undertook the

task and accomplished it. He had intellect and courage enough for that,

and more. Moreover, he had vehement passions to gratify, and they might

all partake of the glory of his success; he was proud, and his pride

reveled in authority; he was ambitious, and his ambition could attain no

higher pitch than it found at the right hand of the Prime Minister; he

was revengeful, and revenge could wish no sweeter gratification than the

contortions of the great who had neglected genius and desert, when they

looked to them for advancement and obtained nothing but cold neglect.

Swift, single-handed, fought the Whigs. For seven months he conducted a

periodical paper, in which he mercilessly assailed, as none but himself

could attack, all who were odious to the Government and distasteful to

himself. Not an individual was spared whose sufferings could add to the

tranquillity and permanence of the Government. Resistance was in vain;

it was attempted, but invariably with one effect--the first wound

grazed, the second killed.

The public were in ecstasies. The laughers were all on the side of the

satirist, and how vast a portion of the community these are, needs not

be said. But it was not in the _Examiner_ alone that Swift offered up

his victims at the shrine of universal mirth. He could write verses for

the rough heart of a nation to chuckle over and delight in.

Personalities to-day fly wide of the mark; then they went right home.

The habits, the foibles, the moral and physical imperfections of

humanity, were all fair game, provided the shaft were tipped with gall

as well as venom. Short poems, longer pamphlets--whatever could help the

Government and cover their foes with ridicule and scorn, Swift poured

upon the town with an industry and skill that set eulogy at defiance.

And because they did defy praise, Jonathan Swift never asked, and was

ever too grand to accept it.

But he claimed much more. His disordered yet exquisite intellect

acknowledged no superiority. He asked no thanks for his labor, he

disdained pecuniary reward for his matchless and incalculable

services--he did not care for fame, but he imperiously demanded to be

treated by the greatest as an equal. Mr. Harley offered him money, and

he quarreled with the Minister for his boldness. "If we let these great

Ministers," he said, "pretend too much, _there will be no governing

them_." The same Minister desired to make Swift his chaplain. One

mistake was as great as the other. "My Lord Oxford, by a second hand,

proposed my being his chaplain, which I, by a second hand, refused. I

will be no man's chaplain alive." The assumption of the man was more

than regal. At a later period of his life he drew up a list of his

friends, ranking them respectively under the heads "Ungrateful,"

"Grateful," "Indifferent," and "Doubtful." Pope appears among the

grateful. Queen Caroline among the ungrateful. The audacity of these

distinctions is very edifying. What autocrat is here for whose mere

countenance the whole world is to bow down and be "grateful!"

It is due to Swift's imperiousness, however, to state that, once

acknowledged as an equal, he was prepared to make every sacrifice that

could be looked for in a friend. Concede his position, and for fortune

or disgrace he was equally prepared. Harley and Bolingbroke, quick to

discern the weakness, called their invulnerable ally by his Christian

name, but stopped short of conferring upon him any benefit whatever. The

neglect made no difference to the haughty scribe, who contented himself

with pulling down the barriers that had been impertinently set up to

separate him from rank and worldly greatness. But, if Swift shrank from

the treatment of a client, he performed no part so willingly as that of

a patron. He took literature under his wing and compelled the Government

to do it homage. He quarreled with Steele when he deserted the Whigs,

and pursued his former friend with unflinching sarcasm and banter, but

at his request Steele was maintained by the Government in an office of

which he was about to be deprived. Congreve was a Whig, but Swift

insisted that he should find honor at the hands of the Tories, and

Harley honored him accordingly. Swift introduced Gay to Lord

Bolingbroke, and secured that nobleman's weighty patronage for the poet.

Rowe was recommended for office, Pope for aid. The well-to-do, by

Swift's personal interest, found respect, the indigent, money for the

mitigation of their pains. At Court, at Swift's instigation, the Lord

Treasurer made the first advances to men of letters, and by the act made

tacit confession of the power which Swift so liberally exercised, for

the advantage of everybody but himself. But what worldly distinction, in

truth, could add to the importance of a personage who made it a point

for a Duke to pay him the first visit, and who, on one occasion,

publicly sent the Prime Minister into the House of Commons to call out

the First Secretary of State, whom Swift wished to inform that he would

not dine with him if he meant to dine late?

A lampoon directed against the Queen's favorite, upon whose red hair

Swift had been facetious, prevented the satirist's advancement in

England. The see of Hereford fell vacant in 1712. Bolingbroke would now

have paid the debt due from his Government to Swift, but the Duchess of

Somerset, upon her knees, implored the Queen to withhold her consent

from the appointment, and Swift was pronounced by Her Majesty as "too

violent in party" for promotion. The most important man in the kingdom

found himself in a moment the most feeble. The fountain of so much honor

could not retain a drop of the precious waters for itself. Swift, it is

said, laid the foundations of fortune for upward of forty families who

rose to distinction by a word from his lips. What a satire upon power

was the satirist's own fate! He could not advance himself in England one

inch. Promotion in Ireland began and ended with his appointment to the

Deanery of St. Patrick, of which he took possession, much to his disgust

and vexation, in the summer of 1713.

The summer, however, was not over before Swift was in England again. The

wheels of government had come to a dead lock, and of course none but he

could right them. The Ministry was at sixes and sevens. Its very

existence depended upon the good understanding of the chiefs,

Bolingbroke and Harley, and the wily ambition of the latter, jarring

against the vehement desires of the former, had produced jealousy,

suspicion, and now threatened immediate disorganization. A thousand

voices called the Dean to the scene of action, and he came full of the

importance of his mission. He plunged at once into the vexed sea of

political controversy, and whilst straining every effort to court his

friends, let no opportunity slip of galling their foes. His pen was as

damaging and industrious as ever. It set the town in a fever. It caused

Richard Steele to be expelled from the House of Commons, and it sent the

whole body of Scotch peers, headed by the Duke of Argyle, to the Queen,

with the prayer that a proclamation might be issued for the discovery of

their libeller. Swift was more successful in his assaults than in its

mediation. The Ministers were irreconcilable. Vexed at heart with

disappointment, the Dean, after his manner, suddenly quitted London, and

shut himself up in Berkshire. One attempt he made in his strict

seclusion to uphold the Government and save the country, and the

composition is a curiosity in its way. He published a proposition for

the exclusion of all Dissenters from power of every kind, for

disqualifying Whigs and Low Churchmen for every possible office, and for

compelling the presumptive heir to the throne to declare his abomination

of Whigs, and his perfect satisfaction with Her Majesty's present

advisers. Matters must have been near a crisis when this modest pamphlet

was put forth; and so they were. By his intrigues Bolingbroke had

triumphed over his colleagues, and Oxford was disgraced. The latter,

about to retire into obscurity, addressed a letter to Swift, entreating

him, if he were not tired of his former prosperous friend, "to throw

away so much time on one who loved him as to attend him upon his

melancholy journey." The same post brought him word that his own victory

was won. Bolingbroke triumphant besought his Jonathan, as he loved his

Queen, to stand by her Minister, and to aid him in his perilous

adventure. Nothing should be wanting to do justice to his loyalty. The

Duchess of Somerset would be reconciled, the Queen would be gracious,

the path of honor should lie broad, open, and unimpeded before him.

Bolingbroke and Harley were equally the friends of Swift. What could he

do in his extremity? What would a million men, taken at random from the

multitude, have done, had they been so situated, so tempted? Not that

upon which Swift in his chivalrous magnanimity, at once decided. He

abandoned the prosperous to follow and console the unfortunate. "I

meddle not with Lord Oxford's faults," is his noble language, "as he was

a Minister of State, but his personal kindness to me was excessive. He

distinguished and chose me above all men when he was great." Within a

few days of Swift's self-denying decision Queen Anne was a corpse,

Bolingbroke and Oxford both flying for their lives, and Swift himself

hiding his unprotected head in Ireland amidst a people who at once

feared and hated him.

During Swift's visit to London in 1710 he had regularly transmitted to

Stella, by which name Esther Johnson is made known to posterity, an

account of his daily doings with the new Government. The journal

exhibits the view of the writer that his conduct invariably presents. It

is full of tenderness and confidence, and not without coarseness that

startles and shocks. It contains a detailed and minute account, not only

of all that passed between Swift and the Government, but of his

changeful feelings as they arose from day to day, and of his physical

infirmities, that are commonly whispered into the ear of a physician. If

Swift loved Stella in the ordinary acceptation of the term, he took

small pains in his diary to elevate the sentiments with which she

regarded her hero. The journal is not in harmony throughout. Toward the

close it lacks the tenderness and warmth, the minuteness and

confidential utterance, that are so visible at the beginning. We are

enabled to account for the difference. Swift had enlarged the circle of

his female acquaintance whilst fighting for his friends in London. He

had become a constant visitor, especially, at the house of a Mrs.

Vanhomrigh, who had two daughters, the eldest of whom was about twenty

years of age, and had the same Christian name as Stella. Esther

Vanhomrigh had great taste for reading, and Swift, who seems to have

delighted in such occupation, condescended, for the second time in his

life, to become a young lady's instructor. The great man's tuition had

always one effect upon his pupils. Before Miss Vanhomrigh had made much

progress in her studies she was over head and ears in love, and, to the

astonishment of her master, she one day declared the passionate and

undying character of her attachment. Swift met the confession with a

weapon far more potent when opposed to a political foe than when

directed against the weak heart of a doting woman. He had recourse to

raillery, but, finding his banter of no avail, endeavored to appease the

unhappy girl by "an offer of devoted and everlasting friendship, founded

on the basis of virtuous esteem." He might with equal success have

attempted to put out a conflagration with a bucket of cold water. There

was no help for the miserable man. He returned to his deanery at the

death of Queen Anne with two love affairs upon his hands, but with the

stern resolution of encouraging neither, and overcoming both.

Before quitting England he wrote to Esther Vanhomrigh, or Vanessa, as he

styles her in his correspondence, intimating his intention to forget

everything in England and to write to her as seldom as possible. So far

the claims of Vanessa were disposed of. As soon as he reached his

deanery he secured lodgings for Stella and her companion, and reiterated

his determination to pursue his intercourse with the young lady upon the

prudent terms originally established. So far his mind was set at rest in

respect of Stella. But Swift had scarcely time to congratulate himself

upon his plans before Vanessa presented herself in Dublin, and made

known to the Dean her resolution to take up her abode permanently in

Ireland. Her mother was dead, so were her two brothers; she and her

sister were alone in the world, and they had a small property near

Dublin, to which it suited them to retire. Swift, alarmed by the

proceeding, remonstrated, threatened, denounced--all in vain. Vanessa

met his reproaches with complaints of cruelty and neglect, and warned

him of the consequences of leaving her without the solace of his

friendship and presence. Perplexed and distressed, the Dean had no other

resource than to leave events to their own development. He trusted that

time would mitigate and show the hopelessness of Vanessa's passion, and

in the meanwhile he sought, by occasional communication with her, to

prevent any catastrophe that might result from actual despair. But his

thoughts for Vanessa's safety were inimical to Stella's repose. She

pined and gradually sunk under the alteration that had taken place in

Swift's deportment toward her since his acquaintance with Vanessa.

Swift, really anxious for the safety of his ward, requested a friend to

ascertain the cause of her malady. It was not difficult to ascertain it.

His indifference and public scandal, which spoke freely of their

unaccountable connection, were alone to blame for her sufferings. It was

enough for Swift. He had passed the age at which he had resolved to

marry, but he was ready to wed Stella provided the marriage were kept

secret and she was content to live apart. Poor Stella was more than

content, but she overestimated her strength. The marriage took place,

and immediately afterward the husband withdrew himself in a fit of

madness, which threw him into gloom and misery for days. What the

motives may have been for the inexplicable stipulations of this wayward

man it is impossible to ascertain. That they were the motives of a

diseased, and at times utterly irresponsible, judgment, we think cannot

be questioned. Of love, as a tender passion, Swift had no conception.

His writings prove it. The coarseness that pervades his compositions has

nothing in common with the susceptibility that shrinks from disgusting

and loathsome images in which Swift reveled. In all his prose and

poetical addresses to his mistresses there is not one expression to

prove the weakness of his heart. He writes as a guardian--he writes as a

friend--he writes as a father, but not a syllable escapes him that can

be attributed to the pangs and delights of the lover.

Married to Stella, Swift proved himself more eager than ever to give to

his intercourse with Vanessa the character of mere friendship. He went

so far as to endeavor to engage her affections for another man, but his

attempts were rejected with indignation and scorn. In the August of the

year 1717 Vanessa retired from Dublin to her house and property near

Cellbridge. Swift exhorted her to leave Ireland altogether, but she was

not to be persuaded. In 1720 it would appear that the Dean frequently

visited the recluse in her retirement, and upon such occasions Vanessa

would plant a laurel or two in honor of her guest, who passed his time

with the lady reading and writing verses in a rural bower built in a

sequestered part of her garden. Some of the verses composed by Vanessa

have been preserved. They breathe the fond ardor of the suffering maid,

and testify to the imperturbable coldness of the man. Of the innocence

of their intercourse there cannot be a doubt. In 1720 Vanessa lost her

last remaining relative--her sister died in her arms. Thrown back upon

herself by this bereavement, the intensity of her love for the Dean

became insupportable. Jealous and suspicious, and eager to put an end to

a terror that possessed her, she resolved to address herself to Stella,

and to ascertain from her own lips the exact nature of her relations

with her so-called guardian. The momentous question was asked in a

letter, to which Stella calmly replied by informing her interrogator

that she was the Dean's wife. Vanessa's letter was forwarded by Stella

to Swift himself, and it roused him to fury. He rode off at once to

Cellbridge, he entered the apartment in which Vanessa was seated, and

glared upon her like a tiger. The trembling creature asked her visitor

to sit down. He answered the invitation by flinging a packet on the

table, and riding instantly away. The packet was opened; it contained

nothing but Vanessa's letter to Stella. Her doom was pronounced. The

fond heart snapped. In a few weeks the hopeless, desolate Vanessa was in

her grave.

Swift, agonized, rushed from the world. For two months subsequently to

the death of Vanessa his place of abode was unknown. But at the end of

that period he returned to Dublin calmer for the conflict he had

undergone. He devoted himself industriously again to affairs of State.

His pen had now a nobler office than to sustain unworthy men in

unmerited power. We can but indicate the course of his labors. Ireland,

the country not of his love, but of his birth and adoption, treated as a

conquered province, owed her rescue from absolute thraldom to Swift's

great and unconquerable exertions on her behalf. He resisted the English

Government with his single hand, and overcame them in the fight. His

popularity in Ireland was unparalleled even in that excited and

generous-hearted land. Rewards were offered to betray him, but a million

lives would have been sacrificed in his place before one would have

profited by the patriot's downfall. He was worshiped, and every hair of

his head was precious and sacred to the people who adored him.

In 1726 Swift revisited England, for the first time since the death of

Queen Anne, and published, anonymously as usual, the famous satire of

_Gulliver's Travels_. Its immediate success heralded the universal fame

that masterly and singular work has since achieved. Swift mingled once

more with his literary friends, and lived almost entirely with Pope.

Yet courted on all sides he was doomed again to bitter sorrow. News

reached him that Stella was ill. Alarmed and full of self-reproaches, he

hastened home to be received by the people of Ireland in triumph, and to

meet--and he was grateful for the sight--the improved and welcoming

looks of the woman for whose dissolution he had been prepared. In March,

1727, Stella being sufficiently recovered, the Dean ventured once more

to England, but soon to be resummoned to the hapless couch of his

exhausted and most miserable wife. Afflicted in body and soul, Swift

suddenly quitted Pope, with whom he was residing at Twickenham, and

reaching his home, was doomed to find his Stella upon the verge of the

grave. Till the last moment he continued at her bedside, evincing the

tenderest consideration, and performing what consolatory tasks he might

in the sick chamber. Shortly before her death part of a conversation

between the melancholy pair was overheard. "Well, my dear," said the

Dean, "if you wish it, it shall be owned." Stella's reply was given in

fewer words. "_It is too late._" "On the 28th of January," writes one of

the biographers of Swift, "Mrs. Johnson closed her weary pilgrimage, and

passed to that land where they neither marry nor are given in marriage,"

the second victim of one and the same hopeless and consuming passion.

Swift stood alone in the world, and for his punishment was doomed to

endure the crushing solitude for the space of seventeen years. The

interval was gloomy indeed. From his youth the Dean had been subject to

painful fits of giddiness and deafness. From 1736 these fits became more

frequent and severe. In 1740 he went raving mad, and frenzy ceased only

to leave him a more pitiable idiot. During the space of three years the

poor creature was unconscious of all that passed around him, and spoke

but twice. Upon the 19th of October, 1745, God mercifully removed the

terrible spectacle from the sight of man, and released the sufferer from

his misery, degradation, and shame.

The volumes, whose title is found below,[1] and which have given

occasion to these remarks, are a singular comment upon a singular

history. It is the work of a Frenchman who has ventured to deduce a

theory from the _data_ we have submitted to the reader's notice. With

that theory we cannot agree: it may be reconcilable to the romance which

M. de Wailly has invented, but it is altogether opposed to veritable

records that cannot be impugned. M. de Wailly would have it that Swift's

marriage with Stella was a deliberate and rational sacrifice of love to

principle, and that Swift compensated his sacrificed love by granting

his principle no human indulgences; that his love for Vanessa, in fact,

was sincere and ardent, and that his duty to Stella alone prevented a

union with Vanessa. To prove his case M. de Wailly widely departs from

history, and makes his hypothesis of no value whatever, except to the

novel reader. As a romance, written by a Frenchman, _Stella and Vanessa_

is worthy of great commendation. It indicates a familiar knowledge of

English manners and character, and never betrays, except here and there

in the construction of the plot, the hand of a foreigner. It is quite

free from exaggeration, and inasmuch as it exhibits no glaring

anachronism or absurd caricature, is a literary curiosity. We accept it

as such, though bound to reject its higher claims. The mystery of

Swift's amours has yet to be cleared up. We explain his otherwise

unaccountable behavior by attributing his cruelty to prevailing

insanity. The career of Swift was brilliant, but not less wild than

dazzling. The sickly hue of a distempered brain gave a color to his acts

in all the relations of life. The storm was brewing from his childhood;

it burst forth terribly in his age, and only a moment before all was

wreck and devastation, the half-distracted man sat down and made a will,

by which he left the whole of his worldly possessions for the foundation

of a lunatic asylum.

[1: _Stella and Vanessa: A Romance from the French. By Lady Duff

Gordon. In two vols. Bentley. 1850.]

AUTHORS AND BOOKS.

We find in the _Deutsche Zeitung aus Boehmen_, an account of a visit to

the great German satirist and poet Henry Heine, who lives at Paris,

where, as is known, he has long been confined to his bed with a

lingering illness. We translate the following for the _International_:--

"It is indeed a painful or rather a terrible condition in which Heine

now is and has been for the past year; though the paralysis has made no

progress, it has at least experienced no alleviation. He has now lain

near two years in bed, and during that time has not seen a tree nor a

speck of the blue sky. He cannot raise himself, and scarcely moves. His

left eye is blind, his right can just perceive objects, but cannot bear

the light of day. His nights are disturbed by fearful torments, and only

morphine can produce him the least repose. Hope of recovery has long

been given up, and he himself entertains no illusions on that subject.

He knows that his sufferings can end only with death. He speaks of this

with the utmost composure."

The writer goes on to contradict, as calumnious, the report that Heine

had become religious, saying, that he bears his tortures without "the

assistance of saints of any color, and by the inward power of the free

man." He does not regard himself as a sinner, and has nothing to repent

of, since he has but rejoiced like a child, in everything

beautiful--chasing butterflies, finding flowers by the way-side, and

making a holiday of his whole life. He has, however, often called

himself religious, by way of contradiction, and from antipathy to a

certain clique who openly proclaim themselves atheists, and under that

sonorous title seek to exercise a certain terror on others.

It seems that Heine has lost a great deal of property through various

speculators who have persuaded him to join in their schemes. The writer

says: "Heine's friends are enraged at many of these individuals, and

urge him to attack them publicly, and show them up in their true light.

He owes this satisfaction to himself and to us; at the same time it

would conciliate many who have not pardoned him the cavalier air with

which he has turned off the most respectable notabilities of literature

and patriotism, in order to amuse himself in the company of some

adventurer." By this love for out-of-the-way characters, the writer

thinks that Heine must have collected the materials for a humorous

novel, which could equal the best productions of Mendoza, Smollett, or

Dickens; his experiences in this line have cost him a great deal of

money. We translate the conclusion of the article:--

"We shall be asked if Heine really continues to write? Yes; he writes,

he works, he dictates poems without cessation; perhaps he was never in

his whole life as active as now. Several hours a day he devotes to the

composition of his memoirs which are rapidly advancing under the hand of

his secretary. His mind still resembles, in its wonderful fullness and

vigor, those fantastic ball-nights of Paris, which, under the open sky,

unfold an endless life and variety. There rings the music, there rushes

the dance, and the loveliest and grotesquest forms flit hither and

thither. There are silent arbors for tears of happiness and sorrow, and

places for dancing, with light, full of loud bold laughter. Rockets

after rockets mount skyward, scattering millions of stars, and endless

extravagance of art, fire, poesy, passion, flames up, showing the world

now in green, now in purple light, till at last the clear silver stars

come out, and fill us with infinite delight, and the still consciousness

of life's beauty. Yes, Heine lives and writes incessantly. His body is

broken, but not his mind, which, on the sick bed rises to Promethean

power and courage. His arm is impotent; not so his satire, which still

in its velvet covering bears the fearful knife that has flayed alive so

many a Maryas. Yes, his frame is worn away, but not the grace in every

movement of his youthful spirit. Along with his memoirs, a complete

volume of poems has been written in these two years. They will not

appear till after the death of the poet; but I can say of them that they

unite in full perfection all the admirable gifts which have rendered his

former poems so brilliant. So struggles this extraordinary man against a

terrible destiny, with all the weapons of the soul, never despairing in

this vehement suffering, never descending to tears--bidding defiance to

the worst. As I stood before that sick bed, it seemed as if I saw the

sufferer of the Caucasus bound in iron chains, tortured by the vulture,

but still confronting fate unappalled, and there alone on the sea-shore

caressed by sea-nymphs. Yes, this is the sick-bed and the death-bed of a

great and free man; and to have come near him is not only a great

happiness but a great instruction."

Heine has never been well known in this country. The only work

by him we have seen in English is his _Beitrage zur Deutschen

Literatur-Geschichte_, translated by Mr. G.W. Haven, and published in

Boston, in 1846. It is remarkably clever, and audacious, as the

productions of this German-Frenchman generally are. He is now

fifty-three years of age, having been born at Dusseldorff, in 1797. As

several wealthy bankers, and other persons of substance, in Paris, are

related to him, and he has a pension from the French Government, he is

not likely to suffer very much from the losses of property referred to

in the _Zeitung aus Boehmen_.

* * * * *

Dr. Otto Zirckel has just published at Berlin a volume called "Sketches

from and concerning the United States," which has some curious

peculiarities to the eyes of an American. It is intended as a guide for

Germans who wish either to emigrate to this country or to send their

money here for investment. It begins with a description of the voyage to

America and of the East, West and South of the Union; next it describes

the position of the farmer, physician, clergyman, teacher, jurist,

merchant, and editor, and the chance of the emigrant in each of these

professions. It is written with spirit and humor, and a good deal of

practical judgment and wisdom are concisely and clearly expressed. The

curious part is the advice given to speculators who wish to invest their

money here at a high rate of interest. The author seems to think America

a perfect Eldorado for money lenders, and his book cannot fail to

produce a considerable increase in the amount of German capital employed

in this country. The various state and national loans are described

correctly, showing that Dr. Zirckel might venture safely into the mazes

of Wall Street. The history of repudiation he has studied with care, and

the necessity of final resumption of payments even in Mississippi he

estimates with justice. He suggests as the safest means of managing

matters, that a number of wealthy families should combine their funds

and send over a special agent in whom they can confide, to manage the

same in shaving notes, speculating in land, lending on bond and

mortgage, and making money generally. Thus they can get a high return

and live comfortably in Europe on the toil of Americans, all of which

will be much more grateful to the capitalists than useful to this

country. Better for us to have no foreign capital at all than to have

the interest thereon carried away and consumed in Europe.

* * * * *

Emile Silvestre has sent forth a new volume, _Un Philosophe sous les

Toits_.

* * * * *

The work on Aerostation, by Mr. Green, recently published in

Philadelphia, has been much noticed in Europe, where--particularly in

France--the subject has attracted large attention, in consequence of the

death of Gale, (formerly a player at our Bowery Theater,) near Bordeaux,

and the recent wicked and ridiculous ascents with horses, ostriches, &c.

from the Hippodrome in Paris, and some experiments in ballooning at

Madrid. In an interesting paper in the _Revue des Deux Mondes_, for the

fifteenth of October, we have an account of numerous theories,

experiments, and accidents, constituting an entertaining _resume_ of the

whole matter. Few instances of intrepidity, danger, and escape, excite

livelier emotion than the crossing from England to France by Blanchard,

and Dr. Jeffries, an American, on the seventh of January, 1785. When, by

the loss of gas, the balloon descended rapidly over the channel, and

approached near the surface of the sea, after everything had been thrown

out, even to their clothes, Jeffries offered to leap into the sea, and

by thus lightening the balloon further, afford Blanchard a chance of

safety. "We must both be lost as the case is," said he; "if you think

your preservation is possible, I am ready to sacrifice my life." The

French military ascents are particularly described. Companies of

aeronauts were formed and trained, and Bonaparte took one of them with

him to Egypt, but the British captured all the apparatus for the

generation of gas. The First Consul caused ascents in picturesque

balloons to be made on occasions of public rejoicing for victories, in

order to strike the imaginations of the Egyptians, and an aerostatic

academy was established near Paris. The writer mentions that Lieutenant

Gale, like poor Sam Patch, so famous for a similar absurdity, and for a

similar and not less miserable end, had drank too much brandy for

self-possession in a dangerous predicament. He thinks that the problem

of the direction or government of balloons cannot possibly be solved

with the mechanical means which science now commands; and that, as they

may be usefully employed for the study of the great physical laws of the

globe, all experiments should be restricted to the object of advancing

science. He dwells on what might be accomplished toward ascertaining the

true laws of the decrease of temperature in the elevated regions of the

air, of the decrease of density of the atmosphere, of the decrease of

humidity according to atmospheric heights, and of the celerity of sound.

After all the experiments, and all that has been written upon the

subject, we are confident that the direction of a balloon is quite

impossible, except by a process which we have never yet seen suggested;

that is, by the rapid decomposition of the air in its way, so that a

tube extended in the direction in which it is desired to move, shall

open continually a vacuum into which the pressure of the common

atmosphere shall impel the carriage.

* * * * *

The _Journal des Debats_ announces for publication two works from the

pen of Guizot. The hero of the first is General Monk. Its title is _The

Downfall of the Republic in England in 1660, and the Reestablishment of

the Monarchy: A Historic Study_. It may be regarded as new, though part

has been published before in the form of articles in the _Revue

Francaise_. These articles appeared in 1837. M. Guizot has carefully

revised them, and added a great deal of new matter. The work is also to

be enriched with a number of curious documents never before published,

such as a letter from Richard Cromwell to General Monk, and seventy

dispatches from M. de Bordeaux, then French Ambassador at London, to

Cardinal Mazarin. These dispatches have been found in the archives of

the Foreign Office at Paris. The work has a new preface, which the

_Debats_ says will prove to be no less important in a political than a

historical point of view. The second book is that so well known in this

country upon Washington. We do not understand that anything new is added

to it. It was in the first place issued as the introduction of the

translation into French of Sparks's _Life of Washington_, which the

French journalist says is the most exact and complete work yet published

on the war of independence and the foundation of the United States.

"Monk and Washington," adds the _Debats_: "on the one side a republic

falling and a monarchy rising again into existence, on the other a

monarchy giving birth to a republic; and M. Guizot, formerly the prime

minister of our monarchy, now amid the perplexities of our own republic

the historian of these two great men and these two great events! Were

contrasts ever seen more striking, and more likely to excite a powerful

interest?"

This is very well for the _Debats_. But the omissions by Mr.

Sparks--sometimes from carelessness, sometimes from ignorance, and

sometimes from an indisposition to revive memories of old feuds, or to

cover with disgrace names which should be dishonored; and his occasional

verbal alterations of Washington's letters prevent that general

satisfaction with which his edition of Washington would otherwise be

regarded. We are soon to have histories of the Revolution, from both

Sparks and Bancroft, in proper form. The best documentary history is

not, as the _Debats_ fancies, this collection of Washington's letters,

but Mr. Force's "Archives,"--of which, with its usual want of sagacity

or regard for duty, Congress is publishing but one tenth of the edition

necessary, since every statesman in our own country, and every writer on

American history at home or abroad, needs a copy of it, and from its

extent and costliness it will never be reprinted.

* * * * *

The Rabbi Cahen has published at Paris the Book of Job, which concludes

his learned version of the Hebrew Bible.

* * * * *

Works on the German Revolution and German Politics.--An excellent book

on the Prussian revolution is now being published at Oldenburg. It is

from the pen of Adolf Stahr, a writer of remarkable force and clearness.

He belongs to the party most bitterly disappointed by the turn affairs

have taken in Germany. We mean the democratic monarchists, who labored

under the illusion that they might see Prussia converted into a sort of

republic with a hereditary chief, like Belgium. They desired a monarchy,

with a parliament elected by universal suffrage, and democratic

institutions of every kind. Stahr's book breathes all the bitterness of

their rage at the success of absolutism in snatching from them every

slightest vestige of hope. His book is published serially, four parts

having already been issued. As a record of facts it deserves the praise

of great industry and lucidity in collection and arrangement, while on

every page there glows in suppressed eloquence the indignation of a

generous and manly heart. Of course Stahr cannot be called a historian

in the usual sense of the term. He is rather a political pamphleteer,

maintaining at length the ideas and chastising the foes of his party.

Another and a more permanently valuable work on this subject is the

_Revolutions-Chronik_ (Revolutionary Chronicle) of Dr. Adolf Wolff,

published by Hempel of Berlin. This is a collection of authentic

documents, such as proclamations, placards, letters, legislative acts,

&c., connected with the revolution. They are not only arranged in due

order, but are combined with a clear and succinct narrative of the

events and circumstances to which they relate. We know of no man more

competent than Dr. Wolff to the successful execution of so important an

undertaking. Without being a partisan, his sympathies are decidedly on

the popular side, and the clearness of his judgment cannot be blinded by

any of the feints and stratagems in which the period abounded. He is now

engaged upon the revolution in Prussia, but intends to treat all the

manifestations of the time throughout Germany in the same thorough and

reliable manner. His work will be invaluable to future historians of

this eventful period; at the same time it reads like a romance, not only

from the nature of the events, but from the spirit and keenness of the

style.

Two other striking contributions to the history of this stormy epoch

have been made by Bruno Bauer, the well known rationalist. Bauer treats

the political and religious parties of modern Germany with the same

scornful satire and destructive analysis which appear in his theological

writings. He delights in pitting one side against the other and making

them consume each other. His first book is called the _Buergerliche

Revolution in Deutschland_, (the Burghers' Revolution in Germany); it

was published above a year ago, and attracted a great deal of attention

from the fact that it took neither side, but with a sort of

Mephistophelian superiority, showed that every party had been alike

weak, timid, hesitating, short-sighted, and useless. The New-Catholics

of Ronge's school were especially treated with unsparing severity. Bauer

has now just brought out his second book, which is particularly devoted

to the Frankfort Parliament. In this also the Hegelian Logic is applied

with the same result. The author proves that all that was done in that

body was worth nothing and produced nothing. There is not a particle of

sympathetic feeling in the whole book; but only cold and contemptuous

analysis. It has not made very much of an impression in Germany. Both

these works, and, indeed, the whole school of ultra-Hegelian skeptics

generally, are a singular reaction upon the usual warmth and

sentimentality of German character and literature. They are the very

opposite extreme, and so a very natural product of the times. For our

part we like them quite as well as the other side of the contrast.

* * * * *

Germany is the richest of all countries in historical literature.

Nowhere have all the events of human experience been so variously,

profoundly, or industriously investigated. Ancient history especially

has been most exhaustively treated by the Germans. One of the best and

most comprehensive works in this category is that of Dr. Zimmer, the

seventh edition of which, revised and enlarged, has just been published

at Leipzic. Dr. Zimmer does not proceed upon the hypotheses of Niebuhr

and others, but conceives that the writing of history and romance ought

to be essentially different. The whole work is in one volume of some 450

pages, and of course greatly condensed. It discusses the history of

India, China, and Japan; the western Asiatic States, Assyria, Babylonia,

Syria, Phoenicia, India, down to the fall of Jerusalem; the other

parts of Asia; Egypt to the battle of Actium, with a dissertation on

Egyptian culture; Carthage; Greece to the fall of Corinth; Rome under

the emperors down to the year 476; and concludes with an account of the

literature of classical antiquity.

As we have no manual of this sort in English, that is written up to the

latest results of scholarship, we hope to see some American undertaking

a version of Dr. Zimmer's book. There is considerable learning and

talent in the two octavos on the same subject by Dr. Hebbe, and

published last year by Dewitt & Davenport; but we strongly dislike some

of the doctrines of the work, which are _not_ derived from a thorough

study.

* * * * *

The seventh volume of Professor Schlosser's History of the Eighteenth

Century, and of the Nineteenth till the overthrow of the French Empire,

appeared, in translation, in London, on the first of November. Volume

eighth, completing the work, with a copious index, is preparing for

early publication.

* * * * *

The Discovery of a lost MS. of Jean Le Bel is mentioned in the Paris

papers, as having been made by M. Polain, keeper of the Archives at

Liege, among the MSS. in the _Bibliotheque de Bourgogne_, at Brussels.

It is on the eve of publication, and will be comprised in an octavo

volume, in black letter. This work was supposed to be irretrievably

lost. It was found by M. Polain, transcribed and incorporated into a

prose _Chronicle de Liege_, by Jean des Pres, dit _d'Ontremeuse_. It

comprises a period between 1325 and 1340, which are embraced in one

hundred and forty-six chapters of the first book of _Froissart_. It

therefore contains only the first part of Le Bel's Chronicle:

nevertheless it is a fragment of much importance. Froissart cannot be

considered as a contemporary historian of the events recorded in his

first book, but Le Bel was connected with the greater portion of them,

and was acquainted with them either from personal knowledge or through

those who had authentic sources of information.

* * * * *

Monsieur Bastiat, the political economist, (who has shown more economy

in the matter of credit for the best ideas in his books, than in

anything else we know of,) is not dead, as in the last _International_

was stated. The _Courier and Enquirer_ correspondent says:

"I am glad to say that the report which reached Paris from Italy,

of the death of F. Bastiat, a noted writer on political economy, is

unfounded. That gentleman is recovering his health, and it is now

believed will be able, at the opening of the session, to resume his

seat in the Assembly."

Since his return from Italy he has published at Paris a new edition of

his latest production, the _Harmonies Economiques_, in which he has

availed himself in so large a degree and in so discreditable a manner of

the ideas of Mr. Henry C. Carey, of New Jersey, who, since he first gave

to the public the essentials of M. Bastiat's performance, has himself,

in a volume, entitled _The Harmony of Interests_, published some three

or four months ago in Philadelphia, largely and forcibly illustrated his

just and admirable doctrines. In the _Harmonies Economiques_ M. Bastiat

seeks to prove that the interests of classes and individuals in society,

as now constituted, are harmonious, and not antagonistic as certain

schools of thinkers maintain. Commercial freedom he avers, instead of

urging society toward a state of general misery, tends constantly to the

progressive increase of the general abundance and well being. In

sustaining this proposition M. Bastiat teaches the optimism of the

socialists, and holds that injustice is not a necessary thing in human

relations, that monopoly and pauperism are only temporary, and that

things must come right at last. The powers of nature, the soil,

vegetation, gravitation, heat, electricity, chemical forces, waters,

seas, in short the globe and all the endowments with which God has

enriched it, are the common property of the entire race of man, and in

proportion as society advances this common property is more equally

distributed and enjoyed. Capital assists men in their efforts to improve

this magnificent inheritance; competition is a powerful lever with which

they set in movement and render useful the gratuitous gifts of God; the

social instinct leads them to make a continual exchange of services; and

even now, though the powers of nature enter into these services, those

who receive them pay only for the labor of their fellows, not for

natural products; and the accumulation of capital constantly diminishes

the rate of interest and enables the laborer to derive a greater return

from his toil. M. Bastiat also gives a new definition of value, which he

says is _the relation of two services exchanged_. This is all, we

believe, that he _claims_ to offer as perfectly new,--the main part of

his book appearing as a clearer exposition of the doctrine of Adam

Smith. It will be seen that the theory of the book is infinitely

superior to that of Ricardo or Malthus; it has borrowed truths from the

advanced thinkers of the age; but he would be a bold critic who should

affirm that it had not mingled far-reaching errors with them.

* * * * *

M. Romieu's book in defense of despotism, (lately published in France,)

sounds as if it had been written for the _North American Review_, but it

never could have been sent to its editor, or it would have been adopted

and published by him. It is entitled "The Era of the Caesars," and its

argument is, that history, ancient and modern, and the situation of the

contemporary world, prove that force, the sword, or _Caesarism_, has

ultimately decided, and will prevail, in the affairs of the nations.

Representative assemblies, Monsieur Romieu considers ridiculous, and

mischievous, and in the end fatal: such, at least, he contends, is the

experience of France; and as for the liberty of the press, it means a

form of tyranny which destroys all other liberty. At the beginning of

the century, M. de Fontanes said what (he thinks) multitudes of the

soundest minds would reecho, "I shall never deem myself free in a

country where freedom of the press exists." He would convert all

journals into mere chronicles, and have them strictly watched. Force, he

says, is the only principle, even in governments styled free. He

includes Switzerland and the United States. The condition and destinies

of France he handles with special hardihood. Caesarism is here already

desired and inaugurated--not monarchy, which requires faith in it, nor

constitutional government, which is an expedient and an illusion, but a

supreme authority capable of maintaining itself, and _commanding_

respect and submission. Mr. Walsh reviews the work in one of his letters

to the _Journal of Commerce_; and judging from Mr. Walsh's

correspondence on the recent attempts to establish free institutions in

Europe, we might suspect him of a hearty sympathy with M. Romieu, whom

he describes as an erudite, conscientious personage, formerly a prefect

of a department, and a member of the Assembly.

* * * * *

The German poet, Anastasius Gruen, has just published, at Leipzic a

collection of the _popular songs of Carinthia_, translated from the

original. Carinthia, as, perhaps, all our readers are not aware, is one

of the southerly provinces of the Austrian empire, on the borders of

Turkey; and, during all the wars of Austria with the Moslems, had to

bear the brunt of the fighting. And even after peace was concluded the

Carinthians kept up a sort of minor war on their own account, being

constantly exposed to incursions from the other side of the frontier.

Thus for centuries their country was one extended fortification, and the

whole population in constant readiness to rush to arms when the signal

fires blazed upon the hills. Then every house was a fortress, and even

the churches were surrounded with palisades and ditches, behind which

the women and children sought refuge with their movables when the alarm

came too near. From this period of constant and savage warfare the

popular songs of the country date their origin. Curious to say, many of

their heroes are borrowed from the traditions and history of neighboring

lands. Thus the Servian champion Marko figures a good deal in this

poetry, while the figure which has more importance than all the others

is a foreign and almost fabulous being, called King Mathias; wherever

this mystic personage can be laid hold of and historically identified,

he appears to be Mathias Corvin, king of Hungary. The Carinthians

attribute to him not only all the exploits of a variety of notable

characters, but also the vices of some celebrated illustrations of

immorality. Nor is his career accomplished; according to the tradition

of the southern Slavonians, King Mathias is not yet dead, but sleeps in

a grotto in the interior of Hungary, waiting for the hour of waking,

like Frederick the Redbeard in the Kyffhaeuser, Charlemagne in the

Untersberg at Salzburg, Holger the Dane near Kronburg, and King Arthur

in a mountain of his native country. There sits King Mathias with his

warriors, by a table under a linden tree. Another song makes him, like

Orpheus with Eurydice, go down to hell with his fiddle in his hand to

bring thence his departed bride. But he has no better luck than Orpheus;

on the way out she breaks the commanded silence by saying a word to her

companion, and so is lost forever. These songs are still sung by the

Carinthian soldiers at night, around their watch-fires. There are others

of more modern origin, but they are weak and colorless compared with

these relics of the old heroic time.

* * * * *

Mr. Bryant's delightful "Letters of a Traveler," of which we have

heretofore spoken, has been issued by Mr. Putnam in a new and very

beautiful edition, enriched with many exquisite engravings, under the

title of "The Picturesque Souvenir." It is a work of permanent value,

and in the style of its publication is hardly surpassed by any of the

splendid volumes of the season.

* * * * *

Dr. Laing, one of those restless English travelers who have printed

books about the United States, is now a prominent personage in

Australia, where he has been elected a member of the newly instituted

Legislature, for the city of Sidney. Upon the conclusion of the canvass

he made a speech, after which he was dragged home in his carriage by

some of the more energetic of his partisans, the horses having been

removed by them for that purpose. He is opposed to the Government.

* * * * *

The History of Liberty, by Mr. Samuel Elliot, of Boston, is examined at

considerable length and in a very genial spirit, in the last number of

the _Revue des Deux Mondes_--a review, by the way, in which much more

attention appears to be paid to our literature than it receives in the

_North American_. The writer observes, in the beginning, that the two

initial volumes of Mr. Elliot's great work, now published, in which the

_Liberty of Rome_ is treated, would be a superhuman performance, if

Niebuhr, Muller, Heeren, Grote, and Thirlwall, had not written, and

compares the work of our countryman with the poem on the same subject by

Thomson, the author of "The Seasons." He says:

"Mr. Elliot's work breathes a lofty morality; a grave and masculine

reserve; a deep and constant fear of not having done the best. He

may be subject,--like other Americans more or less _ideologists_

and system-mongers,--to illusions; but he has the true remedy: his

_ideal_ is well placed; he can sympathize fervently with all the

pursuits and employments of human activity; he cherishes a profound

respect for prudence, and moderation; for an enlarging survey and

indulgence of human necessities; for that generosity and virtue

which is tender above all of what has life, and seeks to conciliate

a complete transformation in the ideas of men. Until now, it would

have been difficult to find a thinker who, in judging the Romans,

would not have celebrated their inordinate patriotism, as their

chief glory. Their heroes were admired precisely for the ardor with

which they sacrificed everything--even their children or their

conscience--to the interests of country or party. Mr. Elliot, on

the contrary, discovers in this heroism only a lamentable

deficiency of true virtue and honor; of a sound moral sense and

equitable liberality. To our apprehension, a great reform--an

historical event--is to be recognized in this new moral

repugnance--this new tendency to deem the spirit of _party_ an evil

and a danger. Formerly, nothing was conceived to be nobler than to

serve your party, without stint or reservation;--nothing more

disgraceful than to abandon it even when you could not entertain

the same opinions. The condemnation and reversal of this doctrine

would be a moral advancement more important for human futurity,

than many of the occurrences or the revolutions of the last sixty

years, that have made the most noise."

We believe Mr. Elliot's leisure is not to be seriously interrupted by

public employments, and trust, therefore, that he will proceed, with as

much rapidity as possible, with his grand survey of the advance of

Liberty, down even to our own day--which it is not unlikely will

conclude a very important era of his subject.

* * * * *

Dr. Bowring, who is now, we believe, British Consul at Canton, was the

editor of the last and only complete edition of Jeremy Bentham's works;

he has been one of the most voluminous contributors to the Westminster

Review, and he is eminent as a linguist, though if we may judge by some

of his performances, not very justly so. He translated and edited

specimens of the poetry of several northern nations, and it has often

been charged as an illustration of his dishonesty, that he omitted a

stanza of the sublime hymn of Derzhaven, a Russian, to the Deity,

because it recognized the divinity of Christ, as it is held by

Trinitarians--the Doctor being a Unitarian. He is sharply satirized, and

treated frequently with extreme and probably quite undeserved contempt,

in the Diaries and Correspondence of the late Hugh Swinton Legare.

* * * * *

Mr. Henry Rogers, of Birmingham, has published in London two stout

volumes of his contributions to the _Edinburgh Review_. They are not the

best things that ever appeared under the old "buff and blue," though

they are neat and very readable. Hitherto Professor Rogers has not been

known in literature, except by an edition of the works of Burke. The

reviewals or essays in this collection are divided into biographical,

critical, theological, and political. The first volume consists

principally of a series of sketches of great minds,--in the style,

half-biographical, half-critical, of which so many admirable specimens

have adorned the literature of this age. Indeed, such _demonstrations_

in mental anatomy have been a favorite study in all ages. Among Mr.

Rogers's subjects, are Pascal, Luther, Leibnitz, and Plato, and he

promises sketches of Descartes, Malabranche, Hobbes, Berkeley, and

Locke. The first article, on Thomas Fuller, may look rather dry at

first; but the interest increases, we admire the quaintness of old

Fuller, and not less the fine, accurate, and complete picture given of

his life, character, and works. In this, as in the other biographical

articles, Mr. Rogers tells his story fluently. If he has not the wit of

Sydney Smith, nor the brilliance of Macaulay, he has not the prosiness

of Alison, nor the bitterness of Gifford. He is witty with Fuller,

sarcastic with Marvell, energetic with Luther, philosophical and precise

with Leibnitz, quietly satirical with Pascal, and reflective and

intellectual with Plato. "Dead as a last year's reviewal" is no longer

among the proverbs. Books are too numerous to be read, and people make

libraries of the quarterlies,--thanks to the facilities afforded by Mr.

Leonard Scott! And reviews, properly written,--evincing some knowledge

of the books which furnish their titles, are very delightful and useful

reading, frequently more so than the productions which suggest them, of

which they ought always to give an intelligible description. And this

condition is fulfilled almost always by the reviews published in London

and Edinburgh. Our _North American_ sometimes gives us tolerably

faithful abstracts, and its readers would be glad if its writers would

confine themselves to such labors. But we read an article in it not long

ago, under the title of Mr. Carey's "Past and Present," which contained

no further allusion to this book, nor the slightest evidence that the

"reviewer" had ever seen it. On the other hand, the last number contains

a paper on the Homeric question, purporting to have been occasioned by

Mr. Grote's History of Greece, but deriving its learning, we understand,

altogether from Mr. Mure's History of Greek Literature, a work so

extensive that it is not likely to be reprinted, or largely imported.

This custom which now obtains, of reprinting reviewals, we believe was

begun in this country, where Mr. Emerson brought out a collection of

Carlyle's Essays, Andrews Norton one of Macaulay's, Dr. Furness one of

Professor Wilson's, Mr. Edward Carey one of Lord Jeffrey's, &c. several

years before any such collections appeared in England.

* * * * *

Respecting the Holy Land, no work of so much absolute value has appeared

since Dr. Robinson's, as the Historical and Geographical Sketch by Rabbi

Joseph Schwartz, in a large and thick octavo, with numerous

illustrations, lately published in Philadelphia by Mr. Hart. Rabbi

Schwartz resided in Palestine sixteen years, and he is the only Jew of

eminence who has written of the country from actual observation, since

the time of Benjamin of Tudela. The learned author wrote his work in

Hebrew, and it has been translated by Rabbi Isaac Leeser, one of the

ablest divines in Philadelphia. It is addressed particularly to Jewish

readers, to whom the translator remarks in his preface, "It is hoped

that it may contribute to extend the knowledge of Palestine, and rouse

many to study the rich treasures which our ancient literature affords,

and also to enkindle sympathy and kind acts for those of our brothers

who still cling to the soil of our ancestors and love the dust in which

many of our saints sleep in death, awaiting a glorious resurrection and

immortality."

* * * * *

Mr. John R. Thompson, the accomplished and much esteemed editor of the

_Southern Literary Messenger_, whose genuine and intelligent love of

literature is illustrated in every number of his excellent magazine, has

just published a wise and eloquent address on the present state of

education in Virginia, which was delivered before the literary societies

of Washington College, at Lexington. It discloses the causes of the

ignorance of reading and writing by seventy thousand adults in Virginia,

and forcibly and impressively urges the necessity of a thorough literary

culture to the common prosperity.

* * * * *

A New Play by Mr. Marston, founded on the story of Philip Augustus of

France and Marie de Meranie, has been put into rehearsal at the Olympic

Theater in London.

* * * * *

The Leipzic _Grenzboten_ notices Mrs. Maberly's new romance of "Fashion"

(which we believe has not yet been republished in America) with great

praise, as a work of striking power and artistic management.

Nevertheless, says the critic, this romance has excited in England as

much anger as attention, and this he attributes to the truth with which

the authoress has depicted the aristocratic world. He then makes the

following remarks, which are curious enough to be translated: "The

meaning of the word 'fashion' cannot be rendered in a foreign language.

_La mode_ and its tyranny approach somewhat to the sense, but still it

remains unintelligible to us Germans, because we have no idea of the

capricious, silly, and despotic laws of fashion in England. They do not

relate, as with us, to mere outward things, as clothes and furniture,

but especially to position and estimation in high society. In order to

play a part on that stage it is necessary to understand the mysterious

conditions and requirements which the goddess Fashion prescribes. High

birth and riches, wit and beauty, find no mercy with her if her

whimsical laws are not obeyed. In what these laws consist no living soul

can say: they are double, yes three-fold, the _je ne sais quoi_ of the

French. The exclusiveness of English society is well known, a

peculiarity in which it is only excelled by its copyist the American

society of New York and Boston. But it is not enough to have obtained

admission into the magic circle: there, too, fashion implacably demands

its victims, and to her as to Moloch earthly and heavenly goods, wealth,

and peace of soul, are offered up."

* * * * *

John Ruskin, who has written of painting, sculpture and architecture, in

a manner more attractive to mere amateurs than any other author, will

soon publish his elaborate work, "The Authors of Venice."

Notwithstanding his almost blind idolatry of Turner, and his other

heresies, Ruskin is one of the few writers on art who open new vistas to

the mind; vehement, paradoxical, and one-sided he may be, but no other

writer _clears_ the subject in the same masterly manner--no other writer

suggests more even to those of opposite opinions.

* * * * *

The first two volumes of Oehlenschlager's _Lebens Erinnerungen_ have

appeared at Vienna, and attract more observation than anything else in

the late movements in the German literature. The poet's early struggles

give one kind of interest to this work, and his friendship with

illustrious litterateurs another. Madame de Stael, Goethe, Schiller, the

Schlegels, Steffens, Hegel, and other representatives of German thought,

pass in succession through these pages, mingled with pictures of Danish

life, and criticisms on the Danish drama. Like most German biographies,

this deals as much with German literature as with German life.

* * * * *

Gustave Planche, a clever Parisian critic, has in the last number of _La

Revue des Deux Mondes_, an article on Lamartine's novels and

Confessions, issued within the year. He spares neither the prose nor

poetry of the romantic statesman. He classes the _History of the

Girondists_ with the novels. On the whole he thinks there is less of

fact, or more of transmutation of fact, than in Sir Walter Scott's

Waverley series: as in Scott's Life of Napoleon there was less of

veracity than in any even of his professed fictions founded upon

history. These romancists are never to be trusted, except in their own

domains.

* * * * *

Prosper Merimee, known among the poets by his _Theatre de Clara Gazul_,

and who by his _Chronique du Temps de Charles IX._ and _Colomba_, was

entitled to honorable mention in literature, has written a very clever

book about the United States--the fruit of a visit to this country last

year--which an accomplished New-Yorker is engaged in translating. His

last previous performance was a Life of Pedro the Cruel, which has been

translated and published in London, and is thus spoken of in the

_Literary Gazette_:--

"The subject hardly yields in romantic variety, strange turns of

fortune, characters of strong expression, and tragedies of the

deepest pathos, to anything created by the imagination. Within the

period and in the land which was marked by the fortunes of Pedro of

Castile, the scene is crowded with figures over which both history

and song have thrown a lasting interest. The names of Planche of

France, Inez de Castro of Portugal, Du Guesclin,--the Black Prince,

the White Company--belong alike to romance and to reality. The very

'Don Juan' of Mozart and Byron plays his part for an hour as no

fabulous gallant at the court of Seville; Moors and Christians join

in the council or in the field here, as well as in the strains of

the Romancero; and the desperate game played for a crown by the

rival brothers whose more than Theban strife was surrounded by such

various objects of pity, admiration or terror, wants no incident,

from its commencement to its climax, to fill the just measure of a

tragic theme. One more striking could scarcely have been desired by

a poet; yet M. Merimee, who claims that character, has handled it

with the judgment and diligence of an historian."

* * * * *

Nathaniel Hawthorne, the greatest living American writer born in the

present century, has just published, through Ticknor, Reed and Fields, a

volume for juvenile readers, in the preface to which he says:

"It has not been composed without a deep sense of responsibility.

The author regards children as sacred, and would not for the world

cast anything into the fountain of a young heart that might

embitter and pollute its waters. And even in point of the literary

reputation to be aimed at, juvenile literature is as well worth

cultivating as any other. The writer, if he succeed in pleasing his

little readers, may hope to be remembered by them till their own

old age--a far longer period of literary existence than is

generally attained by those who seek immortality from the judgments

of full grown men."

* * * * *

An attentive correspondent of the _International_, at Vienna, mentions

that letters have been received there from the eccentric but daring and

intelligent American, Dr. Mathews, formerly of Baltimore, who, some

years since, assumed the style of the Arabs, with a view to discovery in

Northern and Central Africa. We hope to obtain further information of

Dr. Mathews, respecting whose adventures there has not hitherto been

anything in the journals for several years.

* * * * *

Professor G.J. Adler, of the New York University, the learned author of

the German and English Dictionary, is now printing a translation which

he has just completed, of the _Iphigenia in Taurus_, by Goethe. Of the

eighteen that remain of the sixty to ninety plays of Euripides, the

_Iphigenia at Tauri_ is one of the most remarkable. When Goethe returned

from Italy, his spirit was infused with the love of ancient art, and his

ambition tempting him to a rivalry of its masters, he selected this

subject, to which he brought, if not his finest powers, his severest

labor; and the drama of Iphigenia--which is in many respects very

different from that of Euripides,--is, next to Faust, perhaps the

noblest of his works. We are not aware that it has hitherto appeared in

English. The forthcoming translation, (which is in the press of the

Appletons,) strikes us very favorably. It is exact, and is generally

flowing and elegant.

* * * * *

The Official Paper of China has a name which means the _Pekin Gazette_.

It is impossible to ascertain when its publication was first commenced,

but it seems to be the oldest newspaper in the world. There is a

tradition that it began under the Sung dynasty in the latter part of the

tenth century. It is originally a sort of handbill, containing official

notices, posted up on the walls of the Capital and sent in manuscript to

provincial officers. At Canton it is printed for the public at large and

sold. It appears every other day in the form of a pamphlet of ten or

twelve pages. It consists of three parts; the first is devoted to Court

news, such as the health and other doings of the Imperial family; the

second gives the decrees of the Sovereign; the third contains the

reports and memorials of public functionaries made to the imperial

government on all subjects concerning the interests of the country. The

decrees are concise in style; the reports and memorials are the

perfection of verbiage. The former have the force of laws, the Emperor

being both legislative and executive. As a record of materials for

history the _Gazette_ is of little value, for a little study shows that

lies are abundant in it, and that its statements are designed as much to

conceal as to make known the facts. Since the English war the number of

documents published relating to affairs with foreign nations is very

small. Something is given respecting the finances, but that too, is of

very little value.

* * * * *

Mr. Williams, who wrote "Shakspeare and his Friends," &c., has just

published a novel entitled "The Luttrells." It was very high praise of

his earlier works that they were by many sagacious critics attributed to

Savage Landor. His novels on the literature of the Elizabethan age

evince taste and feeling, and his sketches of the Chesterfield and

Walpole period in "Maids of Honor," are happily and gracefully done.

"The Luttrells" has passages occasionally more powerful but hardly so

pleasing as some in the books we have named. In mere style it is an

improvement on his former efforts. In the early passages of the story

there is nice handling of character, and frequent touches of genuine

feeling.

* * * * *

The fifth volume of Vaulabelle's _Histoire de la Restauration_, a

conscientious and carefully written history of France and the Bourbon

family, from the restoration in 1815 down to the overthrow of Charles

X., has just been published at Paris. It receives the same praise as the

preceding volumes. M. Vaulabelle it may be remembered was for a brief

period, in 1848, General Cavaignac's Minister of Education and Public

Worship.

* * * * *

Captain Sir Edward Belcher, C.B., R.N., &c., whose presence in New York

we noted recently, is now in Texas, superintending the settlement of a

large party of first class English emigrants. A volume supplemental to

his "Voyage of H.M.S. Samarang," illustrative of the zoology of the

expedition, has been published in London by Arthur Adams, F.L.S.

* * * * *

M. Guizot, it is said, is going back to his old profession of editor. He

is to participate in the conduct of the _Journal des Debats_, in which,

of course, he will sign his articles. We do not always agree with M.

Guizot, but we cannot help thinking him, upon the whole, the most

respectable man who for a long time has been conspicuous in affairs in

France.

* * * * *

The sixth and concluding volume of the life and correspondence of Robert

Southey, edited by C.C. Southey--illustrated with a view of Southey's

Monument in Crosthwaite Church, and a view of Crosthwaite, from Greta

Hill--was published in London, early in November, and will soon be

reissued by Harpers.

* * * * *

Somebody having said that Bulwer had lost his hearing, and was in a very

desponding way in consequence, he has written to the _Morning Post_ to

say he is by no means deaf, but that if he were he should not much

despond on that account, "for the quality and material of the talk

that's going is not calculated to cause any great regret for the

deprivation of one's ears."

* * * * *

The second volume of the Count de Castelnau's Expedition into the

Central Regions of South America, under the auspices of the French

government, has just been published in Paris.

* * * * *

An eminent diplomatist of France has just published two volumes of most

interesting revelations drawn from his own note-books and personal

knowledge. We allude to the _Etudes Diplomatiques et Litteraires_ of

Count Alexis de Saint Priest. On the partition of Poland especially, it

casts an entirely new and conclusive light. M. Saint Priest shows that

apart from the internal anarchy and weakness of Poland, the catastrophe

was the work not of Russia as has been commonly supposed, but of

Frederic the Great of Prussia. Russia had no interest in dividing

Poland; in fact she was already supreme in that country; and besides,

her policy has never been that of an active initiative,--she waits for

the fruit to fall, and does not take the trouble of shaking the tree

herself. The great criminal then in this Polish affair was Prussia, and

the cause was the historic antagonism between Germany and Poland. M.

Saint Priest sketches the character of Frederic with the hand of a

master. "We shall see him," he says in approaching that part of his

subject, "we shall see him as he was, both adventurous and patient,

ardent and calm, full of passion yet perfectly self-possessed, capable

of embracing the vastest horizon and of shutting himself up for the

moment in the most limited detail, his eyes reaching to the farthest

distance, his hand active in the nearest vicinity, approaching his aim

step by step through by-paths, but always gaining it at last by a single

bound. We shall see him employing the most indefatigable, the most

tenacious, the most persevering will in the service of his idea,

preparing it, maturing it by long and skillful reparation, and imposing

it on Europe not by sudden violence, but by the successive and cunning

employment of flattery and intimidation. And finally, when all is

consummated, we shall see him succeed in avoiding the responsibility and

throwing it altogether upon his coadjutors, with an art all the more

profound for the simplicity under which its hardihood was concealed, and

the indifference which masked its avidity. To crown so audacious a

maneuver, he will not hesitate to declare, that "since he has never

deceived any one, he will still less deceive posterity! And in fact he

has treated them with a perfect equality: he made a mock of posterity as

well as of his contemporaries." With regard to the part of France in the

division of Poland, M. Saint Priest attempts to prove that the French

monarchy could not prevent the catastrophe; but that it was in the

revolutionary elements then fermenting in France and opposed to the

monarchy, that Frederic found his most powerful allies. Of course he

defends the monarchy from blame in the matter, and we shall not

undertake to say that he is wrong in so doing. Certainly the downfall of

Poland cannot be regarded as an isolated event, but as a part of the

great series of movements belonging to the age, in which causes the most

antagonistic in their nature often cooperated in producing the same

effect. M. Saint Priest further reasons that the providential mission of

Poland was to oppose Turkey and Islamism, and when the latter ceased to

rise the former necessarily declined. But our space will not permit us

to follow this interesting work any farther. The careful students of

history will not fail to consult it for themselves.

* * * * *

Mary Lowell Putnam, a daughter of the Rev. Dr. Lowell of Boston, and

sister of James Russell Lowell, the poet, is the author of an

annihilating reviewal, in the last _Christian Examiner_, of Mr. Bowen on

the Hungarian Struggle for Independence. The _Tribune_ contains a

_resume_ of the controversy, in which it had itself been honorably

distinguished, and furnishes the following sketch of Professor Bowen's

antagonist:

"Without any ambition for literary distinction, leading a life of

domestic duties and retirement, and pursuing the most profound and

various studies from an insatiate thirst for knowledge, this

admirable person has shown herself qualified to cope with the

difficulties of a complicated historical question, and to vanquish

a notorious Professor on his own ground. The manner in which she

has executed her task (and her victim) is as remarkable for its

unpretending modesty as for its singular acuteness and logical

ability. She writes with the graceful facility of one who is

entirely at home on the subject, conversant from long familiarity

with its leading points, and possessing a large surplus of

information in regard to it for which she has no present use. If

she exhibits a generous sympathy with the cause of the oppressed,

she does not permit the warmth of her feelings to cloud the

serenity of her judgment. She conducts the argument with an almost

legal precision, and compels her opponent to submit to the force of

her intellect."

Harvard would certainly be a large gainer if Mrs. Putnam could succeed

Mr. Bowen as professor of _History_, or,--as the libeller of Kossuth

_fills_ so small a portion of the chair,--if she could be made associate

professor; but to this she would have objections.

* * * * *

In Leipsic a monument has been erected by the German agriculturists to

Herr Thaer, who has done so much amongst them for agricultural science.

It consists of a marble column nine feet high, on which stands the

statue of Thaer, life size. It is surrounded by granite steps and an

iron balustrade. The column bears the inscription, "To their respected

teacher, Albert Thaer, the German Agriculturists--1850."

* * * * *

A New Novel by Bulwer Lytton is announced by Bentley, to appear in three

volumes. Dickens, having completed his "David Copperfield," will

immediately commence a new serial story. Thackeray, it is rumored, has a

new work in preparation altogether different from anything he has yet

published. The Lives of Shakspeare's Heroines are announced to appear in

a series of volumes.

* * * * *

"Sir Roger de Coverly: By the Spectator," is one of the newest and most

beautiful books from the English press. It is illustrated by Thompson,

from designs by Frederick Tayler, and edited with much judgment by Mr.

Henry Wills. The idea of the book is an extremely happy one. It is not

always easy to pick out of the eight volumes of the _Spectator_ the

papers which relate to _Sir Roger de Coverley_, when we happen to want

them. Here we have them all, following close upon each other, forming so

many chapters of the Coverley Chronicle, telling a succinct and charming

story, with just so much pleasing extract from other papers as to throw

light upon the doings of Sir Roger, and enough graceful talk about the

London of Queen Anne's time (by way of annotation) to adapt one's mind

completely to the de Coverley tone of sentiment. The _Spectator_--we

mean the modern gazette of that name--says of it:--

"The character of Sir Roger de Coverley is a creation which, in its

way, has never been surpassed; never perhaps equaled except by the

_Vicar of Wakefield_. The de Coverley establishment and the Vicar's

family have a strong general likeness. They are the same

simple-minded, kind-hearted English souls, in different spheres of

society. The thirty papers of the _Spectator_ devoted to Sir Roger

and his associates, now that we have them together, form a perfect

little novel in themselves, from the reading of which we rise as we

rise from that of Goldsmith, healthier and happier. There never was

so beautiful an illustration of how far mere genuine heartiness of

disposition and rectitude of purpose can impart true dignity to a

character, as Sir Roger de Coverley. He is rather beloved than

esteemed. He talks all the way up stairs on a visit. He is a

walking epitome of as many vulgar errors as Sir Thomas Browne

collected in his book. He has grave doubts as to the propriety of

not having an old woman indicted for a witch. He is brimful of the

prejudices of his caste. He has grown old with the simplicity of a

child. Captain Sentry must keep him in talk lest he expose himself

at the play. And yet about all he does there is an unassuming

dignity that commands respect; and for strength and consistency in

the tender passion Petrarch himself does not excel him. Sir Roger's

unvarying devotion to his widow, his incessant recurrence to the

memory of his affection to her, the remarks relating to her which

the character of Andromache elicits from him at the play, and the

little incident of her message to him on his death-bed, form as

choice a record of passionate fidelity as the sonnets of the

Italian. How beautiful, too, is that death-scene--how quietly

sublime! Let us add that the good Sir Roger is surrounded by people

worthy of him. Will. Wimble, with his good-natured, useless

services; Captain Sentry, brave and stainless as his own sword, and

nearly as taciturn; the servant who saved him from drowning; the

good clergyman who is contented to read the sermons of others; the

innkeeper who must needs have his landlord's head for a sign; the

_Spectator_ and his cronies: and then, and still, the Widow!"

* * * * *

Mr. William W. Story, to whose sculptures we have referred elsewhere, is

engaged in the preparation of a memoir of his father, the great jurist.

* * * * *

The Life of John Randolph, by Hugh A. Garland, has been published by the

Appletons in two octavos. It is interesting--as much so perhaps as any

political biography ever written in this country--but the subject was so

remarkable, and the materiel so rich and various, that it might have

been made very much more attractive than it is. Mr. Garland's style is

decidedly bad--ambitious, meretricious and vulgar--but it was impossible

to make a dull work upon John Randolph's history and character.

* * * * *

The Best Edition of Milton's Poems ever published in America--a reprint

of the best ever published in England--that of Sir Edgerton Brydges, has

just been printed by George S. Appleton of Philadelphia, and the

Appletons of New York. It is everything that can be desired in an

edition of the great poet, and must take the place, we think, of all

others that have been in the market. We are also indebted to the same

publishers for an admirable edition of Burns, which if not as

judiciously edited as the Milton of Sir Edgerton Brydges, is certainly

very much better than any we have hitherto possessed.

* * * * *

The Keepsake: a Gift for the Holidays, is one of the most

splendid--indeed is the _most_ richly executed annual of the season. We

have not had leisure to examine its literary contents, but they are for

the most part by eminent writers. In unique and variously beautiful

bindings, "The Keepsake" is desirable to all the lovers of fine art.

* * * * *

Gray's Poems, with a Life of the author by Professor Henry Reed, has

been published by Mr. Henry C. Baird, of Philadelphia, in a volume the

most elegant that has been issued this year from the press of that city.

The engravings are specimens of genuine art, and the typography is as

perfect as we have ever seen from the printers of Paris or London.

* * * * *

The Rev. Duncan Harkness Weir, a distinguished _alumnus_ of the

university and author of an essay "On the tenses of the Hebrew verb,"

which appeared in "Kitto's Journal of Sacred Literature" for October

last, has been elected Professor of Oriental Languages, in the College

and University of Glasgow, in room of the late Dr. Gray.

* * * * *

Douglass Jerrold announces a republication of all his writings for the

last fifteen years, in weekly numbers, commencing on the first of

January next--"a most becoming contribution to the Industry of Nations

Congress of 1851."

* * * * *

The Rev. Christopher Wordsworth, a nephew of William Wordsworth, has

nearly completed the memoirs of the poet, which will be reprinted, with

a preface by Professor Henry Reed, by Ticknor, Reed and Fields, of

Boston.

The Fine Arts.

Schwanthaler's Bavaria, and the Theresienwiese at Munich.--On the

western side of Munich several streets converge in a plain which is the

arena of the great popular festival that takes place every October.

Around this plain, which is called the Theresienwiese, as well as around

the whole district in which the city is placed, the land rises some

thirty or forty feet. Near the spot where the green waters of the Iser

break through this ridge, King Louis founded the Hall of Fame, which is

to transmit to posterity the busts of renowned natives of the country.

This edifice is in Doric style, and with its two wings forms a

court-yard, opening toward the city. In the center of this court is

placed upon a granite pedestal, thirty feet high, a colossal statue of

bronze, fifty-four feet high, representing Bavaria, to which we have

several times referred in _The International_--our European

correspondence enabling us to anticipate in regard to subjects of

literature and art generally even the best-informed foreign journals.

The Hall of Fame will not be completed for some years, but the statue is

finished, and was first exposed to view on the 9th of October. The

execution of this statue was committed by King Louis to Schwanthaler,

who began by making a model of thirteen feet in height. In order to

carry out the work a wooden house was erected at the royal foundry, and

a skeleton was built by masons, carpenters, and smiths, to sustain the

earth used in the mould for the full-sized model. This was begun in

1838, and ere long the figure stood erect. The subsequent work on the

model occupied two years. The result was greatly praised by the critics,

who wondered at the skill which had been able to give beauty as well as

dignity to a statue of so large dimensions. It holds up a crown of

oak-leaves in the left hand, while the right, resting upon the hip,

grasps an unsheathed sword twined with laurel, beneath which rests a

lion. The breast is covered with a lion's skin which falls as low as the

hips; under it is a simple but admirably managed robe extending to the

feet. The hair is wreathed with oak-leaves, and is disposed in rich

masses about the forehead and temples, giving spirit to the face and

dignity to the form. Such was the model, and such is the now finished

statue. But the subsequent steps in its completion are worthy of a

particular description.

The model was in gypsum, and the first thing done was to take a mould

from it in earth peculiarly prepared for the reception of the melted

metal. The first piece, the head, was cast September 11th, 1844. It

weighs one hundred and twenty hundred-weight, and is five or six feet in

diameter: the remainder was cast at five separate times. When the head

was brought successful out of the mould, King Louis and many of the

magnates of Germany were present. The occasion was in fact a festival,

which Mueller, the inspector of the royal bronze foundry and probably the

first living master of the art of casting in bronze, rendered still more

brilliant by illuminations and garlands of flowers. Vocal music also was

not wanting, as the artists of Munich were present in force, and their

singing is noted throughout Germany. Since last July workmen have been

constantly engaged in transporting the pieces of bronze weighing from

200 to 300 cwt. to the place where the statue was to be erected. For

this purpose a wagon of peculiar construction was used, with from

sixteen to twenty horses to draw it. On the 7th of August the last

piece, the head, was conveyed; it was attended by a festal procession.

The space within the head is so great that some twenty-eight men can

stand together in it. The body, the main portions of which were made in

five castings, weighs from 1300 to 1500 cwt., and has a diameter of

twelve feet; the left arm, which is extended to hold the wreaths, from

125 to 130 cwt.; its diameter is five feet, and the diameter of its

index finger six inches. The nail of the great toe can hardly be covered

with both a man's hands. A door in the pedestal leads to a cast-iron

winding stairway which ascends to the head, within which benches have

been arranged for the comfort of visitors, several of whom can sit there

together with ease. The light enters through openings arranged in the

hair, whence also the eye can enjoy the view of the city and the

surrounding country with the magical Alps in the background. The entire

mass of bronze, weighing about 2600 cwt., was obtained from Turkish

cannon lost in the sea at Navarino and recovered by Greek divers. The

value of the bronze is about sixty thousand dollars. The sitting lion

has a height of near thirty feet. It was cast in three pieces, and

completes the composition in the most felicitous manner.

The statue having been completed, the final removing of the scaffolding

around it and its full exposure to the public took place on the 9th of

October. This was a day of great festivity at Munich and its vicinity. A

platform had been erected directly in front of the statue for the

accommodation of King Maximilian and his suite. The festivities began

with an enormous procession of carriages, led by bands of music and

bearing the representatives of the different industrial and agricultural

trades, with symbols of their respective occupations. As they passed

before the King's platform each carriage stopped, saluted his majesty,

and received a few kindly words in reply. The procession was closed by

the artists of Munich. The carriages took their station in a half circle

around the platform. Soon after, accompanied by the thunder of cannon,

the board walls surrounding the scaffold were gradually lowered to the

ground. The admiration of the statue (which by the way is exactly

fifty-four feet high), was universal and enthusiastic. All beholders

were delighted with the harmony of its parts and the loveliness of its

expression notwithstanding its colossal size. The ceremonies of the day

were closed with speeches and music; the painter Tischlein made a speech

lauding King Louis as the creator of a new era for German art. A very

numerous chorus sung several festive hymns composed for the occasion,

after which the multitude dispersed.

* * * * *

The Dominican Monastery of San Marco at Florence has for centuries been

regarded with special interest by the lovers of art for the share it has

had in the history of their favorite pursuit. Nor has its part been of

less importance in the sphere of politics. The wanderer through its

halls is reminded not only of Fra Angelico da Fiesole and Fra

Bartolommeo, to whose artistic genius the monastery is indebted for the

treasures which adorn its halls, refectory, corridors, and cells, but of

Cosimo de Medici, Lorenzo his great descendant, of Savonarola, and the

long series of contests here waged against temporal and spiritual

tyranny. The works of Giotto and Domenico Ghirlandajo are likewise to be

found in the monastery, and there also miniature pictures of the most

flourishing period of art may be seen ornamenting the books of the

choir. Every historian who has written upon Florence has taken care not

to omit San Marco and its inhabitants.

We are glad to announce that a society of artists at Florence has

undertaken to give as wide a publicity as possible to the noblest

productions of art in this monastery. A former work by the same men is a

good indication of what may now be expected from them. Some years since

they published copies of the most important pictures from the collection

of the Florentine Academy of Art. They gave sixty prints with

explanations. Among engravings from galleries this was one of the best,

containing in moderate compass a history of Tuscan art from Cimabue to

Andrea del Sarto. The new work, which has long been in preparation but

has been delayed by unfavorable circumstances, will now be carried

through the press without delay. Its title is, _San Marco Convento dei

Padri Predicatori in Firenze illustrato e inciso principalmente nei

dipinti del B. Giovanni Angelico_. Antonio Parfetti, the successor of

Morghen and Garavaglia as professor of the art of engraving on copper at

the Florentine Academy, has the artistic supervision of the enterprise.

Father Vincenzo Marchese, to whom the public are indebted for the work

well known to all students, on the artists of the Dominican order, is to

furnish a history of the monastery, a biography of Fra Angelico,

together with explanations of the engravings. Everything is thus in the

most capable hands. The execution of the copperplates leaves nothing to

be desired. The draughtsmen and engravers having had the best

preparatory practice in the above-mentioned series from the Academy,

have fully entered into the spirit of the originals; both outlines and

shading are said by the best critics to combine the greatest delicacy

with exactness, and to reproduce the expression of feeling which is the

difficulty in these Florentine works, with tact and truth. As yet they

have finished only the smaller frescoes which adorn almost every cell;

but they will soon have ready the larger ones, which will show how this

painter, whose sphere was mainly the pious emotions of the soul, was

also master of the most thrilling effects. The same is proved by the

powerful picture of the Crucifixion in the chapter hall, with its heads

so full of expression, a selection from which has just been published by

G.B. Nocchi, who some years since issued the well-known collection of

drawings from the Life of Jesus in the Academy. The impression of the

frescoes on Chinese paper has been done with the greatest care. Forty

plates and forty printed folio sheets will complete the work, which is

to be put at a moderate price. These illustrations of San Marco will be

universally welcomed with delight by the admirers of the beautiful, for

there the painter who most purely represented Christian art passed the

greater part of his life, leaving behind him an incomparable mass of the

most characteristic and charming creations.

* * * * *

Mr. William W. Story, who some time since abandoned a lucrative

profession to devote himself to art, has recently returned from Rome,

where he had been practicing sculpture during the past three years. Mr.

Story, we understand, has brought home with him to Boston several models

of classical subjects, the fruits of his labors abroad, which are spoken

of in the highest terms by those who have had the privilege of

inspecting them. Mr. Story is the only son of the late Justice Story of

Massachusetts. Before going abroad he had distinguished himself by some

of his attempts at sculpture, one of which was a bust of his father,

which he executed in marble. A copy of this work has been purchased or

ordered by some of his father's admirers in London, to be placed in one

of the Inns of Court. Mr. Story also made himself known by a volume of

miscellaneous poems, published in 1845. It is his intention, we learn,

to return to Italy in the spring.

* * * * *

Les Beautes de la France is the title of a splendid new work now

publishing at Paris. It consists of a collection of engravings on steel,

representing the principal cities, cathedrals, public monuments,

chateaux, and picturesque landscapes of France. Each engraving is

accompanied by four pages of text, giving the complete history of the

edifice or locality represented. What is curious about it is that the

engravings are made in London, for what reason we are not informed.

* * * * *

The first exhibition of paintings, such as is now given annually by our

academies, was at Paris in the year 1699. In September of that year, at

the suggestion of Mansart, the first was held in the Louvre. It

consisted of two hundred and fifty-three paintings, twenty-four pieces

of sculpture, and twenty-nine engravings. The second and last during the

reign of Louis XIV. was opened in 1704. That was composed of five

hundred and twenty specimens. During the reign of Louis XV., from 1737,

there were held twenty-four expositions. That of 1767 was remarkable for

the presence of several of the marine pieces of Claude Joseph Vernet.

During the reign of Louis XVI., from 1775 to 1791 there were nine

expositions. The _Horatii_, one of the master pieces of David, figured

in that of 1785. His first pieces had appeared in that of 1782. The

former Republic, too, upon stated occasions "exposed the works of the

artists forming the general commune of the arts." It was in these that

David acquired his celebrity as a painter which alone saved his head

from the revolutionary axe. The Paris exhibition will this year commence

on the fifteenth of December.

* * * * *

The largest specimen of Enamel Painting probably in the world, has

recently been completed by Kloeber and Martens at Berlin. It is four and

a half feet high, and eight feet broad, and it is intended for the

castle church at Wittenberg. The subject is Christ on the Cross, and at

his feet, on the right, stands Luther holding an open bible and looking

up to the Savior; and, on the left, Melancthon, the faithful cooperator

of the great reformer. The tombs of both are in this church, and it is

known that to those who, after the capture of the town, desired to

destroy these tombs, the emperor, Charles V., answered, "I war against

the living, not against the dead!" It was to the portal of this church

that Luther affixed the famous protest against indulgences which

occasioned the first movement of the Reformation. The king has caused

two doors to be cast in bronze, with this protest inscribed on them, so

that it will now be seen there in imperishable characters.

* * * * *

The original portrait of Sir Francis Drake wearing the jewel around his

neck which Queen Elizabeth gave him, is now in London for the purpose of

being copied for the United Service Club. Sir T.T.F.E. Drake, to whom it

belongs, carried to London at the same time, for the inspection of the

curious in such matters, the original jewel, which, beyond the interest

of its associations with Elizabeth and Drake, is valuable as a work of

art. On the outer case is a carving by Valerio Belli, called Valerio

Vincentino, of a black man kneeling to a white. This is not mentioned by

Walpole in his account of Vincentino. Within is a capital and

well-preserved miniature of Queen Elizabeth, by Isaac Oliver, set round

with diamonds and pearls.

* * * * *

The Family of Vernet--the "astonishing family of Vernet"--is thus

referred to by a Paris correspondent of the _Courier and Enquirer_:

"History, probably, does not show another instance of so remarkable

a descent from father to son, through four generations, of the

possession, in an eminent degree, of a special and rare talent.

Claude Joseph was born in 1714, and was the son of a distinguished

painter of his day, Antoine Vernet. He excelled all his

contemporaries in sea pieces. His son, Antoine Charles Horace

Vernet, was, after David, one of the first painters of the empire,

excelling especially in battle scenes. His Rivoli, Marengo,

Austerlitz, Wagram, and his twenty-eight plates illustrative of the

campaign of Bonaparte in Italy, have secured a very high reputation

for A.C.H. Vernet. The greatest living French painter--perhaps it

may be truly said, the greatest painter of the day--is Horace

Vernet, son of the last named. He was born in 1789 _in the Louvre_.

He, like his father, excels in battle scenes and is remarkable for

the vivacity and boldness of his conceptions. He is now covering

the walls of the historic gallery at Versailles with canvas, which

will cause him to descend to posterity as the greatest of his

family. None of your readers who have visited Versailles, but have

stood before and admired till the picture seemed almost reality,

his living representations of recent military events in Africa. His

last admirable picture of Louis Napoleon on _horseback_ will, it is

stated, be one of the greatest attractions of the approaching

exposition."

* * * * *

M. Leutze is expected home from Germany in the spring. He left

Philadelphia, the last time, nearly ten years ago. He will accompany his

great picture of "Washington crossing the Delaware." Powers's statue of

Calhoun, with the left arm broken off by the incompetent persons who at

various times were engaged in attempting to recover it, upon being

removed from the sea under which it had lain nearly three months was

found as fresh in tone as when it came from the chisel of the sculptor.

It has been placed in the temple prepared for it in Charleston. Mr.

Ranney has completed a large picture representing Marion and his Men

crossing the Pedee.

* * * * *

Kaulbach, according to a letter from Berlin in the November _Art

Journal_, was to leave that city about the middle of October, in order

to resume for the winter his duties as Director of the Academy of

Munich. The sum which he will receive for his six great frescoes and the

ornamental frieze, will be 80,000 thalers (12,000_l._ sterling) and this

is secured to him, as the contract was made before the existence of a

constitutional budget.

* * * * *

Homer's Odyssey furnishes the subjects for a series of frescoes now

being executed in one of the royal palaces at Munich. Six halls are

devoted to the work; four of them are already finished, sixteen cantos

of the poem being illustrated on their walls. The designs are by

Schwanthaler, and executed by Hiltensperger. Between the different

frescoes are small landscapes representing natural scenes from the same

poem.

* * * * *

If we credit all the accounts of pictures by the old masters, we must

believe that they produced as many works as with ordinary energy they

could have printed had they lived till 1850. The _Journal de Lot et

Garonne_ states that in the church of the Mas-d'Agenais, Count Eugene de

Lonley has discovered, in the sacristy, concealed beneath dust and

spiders' webs, the 'Dying Christ,' painted by Rubens in 1631. The head

of Christ is said to be remarkable for the large style in which it is

painted, for drawing, color, and vigorous expression.

* * * * *

A picture painted on wood, and purchased in 1848 at a public sale in

London, where it was sold as the portrait of an Abbess by Le Brozino,

has been examined by the Academy of St. Luke at Rome, to whose judgment

it was submitted by the purchaser, and unanimously recognized as the

work of Michael Angelo, and as representing the illustrious Marchesa de

Pescara, Victoria Colonna.

* * * * *

The National Academy of Design has resolved, that the entire body of

artists in this city should be invited to assemble for social

intercourse, in the saloons of the Academy, on the first Wednesday

evening of every month, commencing in December, and continuing until the

season of the annual exhibition.

* * * * *

The French President has presented to the Museum of the Louvre David's

celebrated painting of Napoleon Bonaparte crossing the Alps. This work

was for many years at Bordentown, New Jersey, in possession of Joseph

Bonaparte.

* * * * *

The _Art Journal_ for November contains an engraving on steel of the

marble bust by Mr. Dunham of Jenny Lind. This bust, we believe, was

recently sold in New York, by Mr. Putnam, for four hundred dollars.

* * * * *

Herman's series of pictures called Illustrations of German History,

which gained great praise in Southern Germany some two years since, are

now being engraved on steel at Munich, and will soon be published.

Music and the Drama.

THE ASTOR PLACE OPERA

We have watched with interest the attempts which have been made for

several years to establish permanently the Italian opera in New York.

Although we disapprove of some of the means which have been used to

accomplish this object, yet, upon the whole, those who have been

efficient in the matter, both amateurs and artists, are entitled to the

hearty commendation of our musical world. To the enterprising Maretzek

belongs the palm, for his energy, liberality, and discrimination, in

bringing forward, in succession, so many great works, and so many

artists of superior excellence. No man could have accomplished what has

been accomplished by Maretzek, without a combination of very rare

endowments. Let the public then see to it that one who has done so much

for the cultivation and gratification of a taste for the most refining

and delightful of the arts, does not remain unappreciated and

unrewarded. Of the last star which has been brought forward by M.

Maretzek, the musical critic of _The International_ (who has been many

years familiar with the performances of the most celebrated artists in

London, Paris, St. Petersburgh and Vienna, and who, it is pertinent to

mention, never saw M. Maretzek or Mlle. Parodi except in the orchestra

or upon the stage) gives these opinions.

As an artist, Parodi ranks among the very best of Europe.

Notwithstanding so few years have elapsed since her first appearance

upon the stage, she has attained a reputation second only to that of

Grisi and Persiani. We have often had the pleasure of listening to both

of these last-named celebrities, in their principal roles, and have

dwelt with rapture upon their soul-stirring representations. We have

also listened to the Norma and the Lucrezia Borgia of Parodi, and have

been equally delighted and astonished. Her excellences may be briefly

summed up as follows: With an organ of very great compass and of perfect

register, she combines immense power and endurance, and a variety and

perfection of intonation unsurpassed by any living artist. When she

portrays the softer emotions--affection, love, or benevolence--nothing

can be more sweet, pure, and melodious, than her tones; when rage,

despair, hate, or jealousy, seize upon her, still is she true to nature,

and her notes thrill us to the very soul, by their perfect truthfulness,

power, and intensity of expression. If gayety is the theme, no bird

carols more blithely than the Italian warbler. What singer can sustain a

high or a low tone, or execute a prolonged and varied shake, with more

power and accuracy than Parodi? What prima donna can run through the

chromatic scale, or dally with difficult cadenzas, full of unique

intervals, with more ease and precision than our charming Italian? Who

can execute a musical tour de force with more effect than she has so

recently done in Norma and Lucrezia?

Persiani has acquired her great reputation by husbanding her powers for

the purpose of making frequent points, and on this account she is not

uniform, but by turn electrifies and tires her audience. She passes

through the minor passages, undistinguished from those around her, but

in the concerted pieces, and wherever she can introduce a cadenza or a

_tour de force_, she carries all before her. Parodi is good

_everywhere_--in the dull recitative, and in the secondary and

unimportant passages. Her magnificent acting, combined with her superb

vocalization, enchain through the entire opera.

Grisi, like Parodi, is always uniform and accurate in her

representations, and upon the whole should be regarded as the queen of

song; but with these exceptions we know of no person who deserves a

higher rank as a true artist than Parodi. As yet she is not sufficiently

understood. She electrifies her hearers, and secures their entire

sympathies, but they have still to learn that silvery and melodious

tones, and cool mechanical execution, do not alone constitute a genuine

artist or a faultless prima donna. When the public understand how

perfectly Parodi identifies herself with the emotions and passions she

has to portray,--when they appreciate the immense variety of intonations

with which she illustrates her characters, and the earnestness and

intensity with which she throws her whole nature into all she does--then

she will be hailed as the greatest artist ever on this continent, and

one of the greatest in the world.

* * * * *

Mrs. E. Oakes Smith's new tragedy called "The Roman Tribute," has been

produced in Philadelphia for several nights in succession, with very

decided success. The leading character in this play, a noble old Roman,

is quite an original creation. He is represented as a mixture of antique

patriotism, heroic valor, sublime fidelity, and stern resolution, tinged

with a beautiful coloring of romance which softens and relieves his more

commanding virtues. Several feminine characters of singular loveliness

are introduced. The play abounds in scenes of deep passion and thrilling

pathos, while its chaste elegance of language equally adapts it for the

closet or the stage. It was brought out with great splendor of costume,

scenery, proscenium, and the other usual accessories of stage effect,

and presented one of the most gorgeous spectacles of the season. We are

gratified to learn that the dramatic talent of this richly-gifted lady,

concerning which we have before expressed ourselves in terms of high

encomium, has received such a brilliant illustration from the test of

stage experiment. Mrs. Oakes Smith's admirable play of "Jacob Leisler"

will probably be acted in New York during the season.

* * * * *

LEIGH HUNT UPON G.P.R. JAMES.

I hail every fresh publication of James, though I half know what he is

going to do with his lady, and his gentleman, and his landscape, and his

mystery, and his orthodoxy, and his criminal trial. But I am charmed

with the new amusement which he brings out of old materials. I look on

him as I look on a musician famous for "variations." I am grateful for

his vein of cheerfulness, for his singularly varied and vivid

landscapes, for his power of painting women at once lady-like and loving

(a rare talent,) for making lovers to match, at once beautiful and

well-bred, and for the solace which all this has afforded me, sometimes

over and over again, in illness and in convalescence, when I required

interest without violence, and entertainment at once animated and mild.

* * * * *

HERR HECKER DESCRIBED BY MADAME BLAZE DE BURY.

We have heretofore given in the _International_ some account of Madame

Blaze de Bury, and have made some extracts from her piquant and

otherwise remarkable book, "Germania."[2] Looking it over we find

considerable information respecting Herr Hecker, who, since his

unfortunate attempt to revolutionize Germany, has lived in the United

States, being now, we believe, a farmer somewhere in the West. According

to the adventurous Baroness, Hecker was the first man in Germany to

declare for revolution. He was born, near Mannheim, in 1811; he took a

doctor's degree in the University of Heidelberg, followed the profession

of the law, and was elected a member of the Lower House in his 31st

year. Thenceforth he was active in opposition. He possessed all the

chief attributes of a popular leader, and his person was graceful and

commanding, his temperament ardent, his eloquence impassioned. Although

the Grand Duke Leopold was the "gentlest and most paternal of

sovereigns," according to Madame de Bury, still there were many radical

defects in the constitution of Baden. Against these defects Hecker waged

war, and with some success, which instigated him to further efforts

against the government. At length he was beaten on a motion to stop the

supplies, and he retired into France disgusted with his countrymen.

After some time he returned impregnated with the reddest republicanism.

He found sympathy in Baden, and when the revolution broke out in Paris,

he resolved to raise the standard of Republicism in Germany. In April,

1848, he set out for Constance, with four drummers and eight hundred

Badeners. He and they, extravagantly dressed and armed, proceeded

unopposed, singing "Hecker-songs," and comparing their progress to the

march of the French over the Simplon! They arrived at Constance, and

called the people to arms, but the people would not come. The slouched

hats and huge sabers of the patriots did not produce the desired

impression, and then _it rained_. In short, the movement failed.

Finally, having beaten up all the most disaffected parts of the country

for recruits, Hecker arrived at Kandern with twelve hundred men. Here

Gagern met him with a few hundred regular troops. Hecker attempted to

gain them over with the cry of "German brotherhood," but Gagern kept

them steady until he fell, mortally wounded, on the bridge. Then there

was a slight skirmish; both parties retreated, and act the first of the

drama closed. Meanwhile the _Vor Parlament_ had been summoned, and the

National Assembly of Frankfort had met in the Paulskircke, to the number

of four hundred deputies; their self-constituted task was simply to

reform all Germany. Frankfort was stirring and joyous upon this

occasion, as it had used to be in former days, when within its walls

was elected the Head of the Holy Roman Empire. Bells were rung, cannon

fired, triumphal arches raised, green boughs and rainbow-colored banners

waved, flowers strewn in the streets, tapestries hung from windows and

balconies, hands stretched forth in greeting, voices strained to call

down blessings; all that popular enthusiasm could invent was there, and

one immense cry of rejoicing saluted what was fondly termed the

"Regeneration of Germany." The tumults, the misery, the bloodshed, and

the disappointment that followed, until the Rump of this "magniloquent

Parliament" sought shelter at Stuttgardt, are fresh in our memory.

[2: Germania: its Courts, Camps, and People. By the Baroness Blaze

de Bury. London: Colburn.]

Hecker, having done his utmost to "agitate" his country, and having

failed "to inspire a dastard populace with the spirit of the ancient

Roman people," as Madame expresses it, he fled to America. But his name

was still a tower of strength to his Red brethren and the _Freicorps_ of

the Schwartzwald and the Rhine. In Western Germany a year ago last

summer his return was enthusiastically expected by the revolutionary

army. "When Hecker comes," said they, "we shall be invincible." He came:

his followers crowded round him and implored him at once to lead them on

to victory! "Victory be d--d," was the reply of the returned exile; "go

home to your plows and your vines and your wives and children, and leave

me to attend to mine." Hecker had only come to Europe for his family,

and he returned almost immediately to America. Meanwhile the war blazed

up for a little while and then expired, leaving behind it the _Deutsche

Verwirrung_[3] as it now presents itself in Germania.[4]

[3: Literally, the _German entanglement_.]

[4: Hecker seems to have been a sincere enthusiast; and it is

always observed by his friends that he renounced ease and comfort

for the cause that he espoused. We append a single verse from one

of the "Hecker songs" that were in 1849 in the mouth of every

Badish republican:--

"Look at Hecker wealth-renouncing,

O'er his head the red plume waves,

Th' awakening people's will announcing,

For the tyrant's blood he craves!

Mud boots thick and solid wears he,

All round Hecker's banner come,

And march at sound of Hecker's drum."]

Original Poetry.

THE GRIEF OF THE WEEPING WILLOW.

Round my cottage porch are wreathing

Creeping vines, their perfume breathing

To the balmy breeze of Spring.

Near it is a streamlet flowing,

Where old shady trees are growing;

But of _one alone_ I sing.

O'er the water sadly bending,

With the wave its leaflets blending,

Stands a lonely willow tree.

And the shadow seems e'erlasting,

That its boughs are always casting

O'er the tiny wavelets' glee.

Oft I've wondered what the sorrow,

That ne'er know a gladsome morrow,

In the mourner's heart was sealed;

But no bitter wail of sadness,

Nor low tone of chastened gladness,

Had the willow tree revealed.

When the breeze its leaves was lifting;

When the snows were round it drifting,

Seemed it still to grieve the same.

Round its trunk a vine is twining,

But its tendrils too seem pining

For a hand to tend and claim.

Type of love that bears life's testing,

They earth's rudest storms are breasting;

Harmed not--so together borne;

And like girl to lover clinging,

Passing time is only bringing

Strength for every coming morn.

Of one summer eve I ponder,

When I musing chanced to wander

By the streamlet's margin bright.

Moonbeams thro' the leaves were streaming,

And each leaping wave was gleaming

With a paly, astral light.

O'er me hung the weeping willow;

Mossy bank was balmy pillow,

And in slumber sweet I dreamed:

Dreamed of music round me gushing,

That as winds o'er harp-strings rushing,

E'er like angel's whisper seemed.

Oh, those low-breathed tones of sorrow;

Would that mortal tongue could borrow

Power to sing their sweetness o'er;

Here and there a sentence gleaming,

Soon my spirit caught the meaning

That the mournful numbers bore.

Sleeper, who beneath my shade,

Hath thy couch of dreaming made;

Listen as I breathe to thee

All my mournful history.

Childhood, youth, and womanhood,

Have beneath my branches stood;

And of each as pass thy slumbers,

Speak my melancholy numbers.

Of a fair-haired child I tell,

Who, one evening shadows fell,

Many a bright and gladsome hour

Passed mid haunt of bird and flower;

O'er the grassy meadow straying,

By the streamlet's margin playing,

Free from thoughts of care and sadness,

Full of life, and joy, and gladness.

Where my branches lowly hung

Oft her fairy form hath swung,

And methinks her laugh I hear,

Gaily ringing sweet and clear,

As with fading light of day,

Tripped her dancing feet away,

With many smiles and fewer tears,

Thus flew childhood's sunny years.

Soon she in my shadow stood,

On the verge of womanhood:

O'er her pale and thoughtful brow

Sunny tress was braided now;

Softer tones her lips were breathing,

Calmer smiles around them wreathing,

Than in childhood's gayer day,

Sported from those lips away.

Often with her came another;

But more tender than a brother

Seemed he in the care of her

Who was his perfect worshiper.

His the hand that trained the vine

Round my mossy trunk to twine;

'Twas the parting gift of one,

Whom no more I looked upon.

Memories of bygone hours

Seemed to her its fragile flowers.

And each bursting, fragrant blossom

Wore she on her gentle bosom,

'Till like them in sad decay,

Passed her maiden life away.

Once, and only once again,

To the trysting place she came:

Sad and tearful was her eye,

And I heard a mournful sigh,

Breathed from out the parted lips,

Whose smile seemed quenched by grief's eclipse.

Leaf and flower were fading fast,

'Neath the autumn's chilling blast.

And all nature seemed to be

Kindred with her misery.

Winter passed--but spring's warm sun

Brought not back the long-missed one.

And though vainly, still I yearn

For that stricken one's return.

HERMANN

_Riverside, Nov. 10, 1850._

A STORY WITHOUT A NAME.[5]

WRITTEN FOR THE INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY MAGAZINE BY

G.P.R. JAMES, ESQ.

[5: Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1850, by

G.P.R. James, in the Clerk's office of the District Court of the

United States, for the Southern District of New York.]

CHAPTER I.

Let me take you into an old-fashioned country house, built by architects

of the early reign of James the First. It had all the peculiarities--I

might almost say the oddities--of that particular epoch in the building

art. Chimneys innumerable had it. Heaven only knows what rooms they

ventilated; but their name must have been legion. The windows were not

fewer in number, and much more irregular: for the chimneys were gathered

together in some sort of symmetrical arrangement, while the windows were

scattered all over the various faces of the building, with no apparent

arrangement at all. Heaven knows, also, what rooms they lighted, or were

intended to light, for they very little served the purpose, being

narrow, and obstructed by the stone mullions of the Elizabethan age.

Each too had its label of stone superincumbent, and projecting from the

brick-work, which might leave the period of construction somewhat

doubtful--but the gables decided the fact.

They, too, were manifold; for although the house had been built all at

once, it seemed, nevertheless, to have been erected in detached masses,

and joined together as best the builder could; so that there were no

less than six gables, turning north, south, east, and west, with four

right angles, and flat walls between them. These gables were

surmounted--topped, as it were, by a triangular wall, somewhat higher

than the acute roof, and this wall was constructed with a row of steps,

coped with freestone, on either side of the ascent, as if the architect

had fancied that some man or statue would, one day or another, have to

climb up to the top of the pyramid, and take his place upon the crowning

stone.

It was a gloomy old edifice: the bricks had become discolored; the

livery of age, yellow and gray lichen, was upon it; daws hovered round

the chimney tops; rooks passed cawing over it, on the way to their

conventicle hard by; no swallow built under the eaves; and the trees, as

if repelled by its stern, cold aspect, retreated from it on three sides,

leaving it alone on its own flat ground, like a moody man amidst a gay

society.

On the fourth side, indeed, an avenue--that is to say, two rows of old

elms--crept cautiously up to it in a winding and sinuous course, as if

afraid of approaching too rapidly; and at the distance of some five or

six hundred yards, clumps of old trees, beeches and evergreen oaks, and

things of somber foliage, dotted the park, only enlivened by here and

there a herd of deer.

Now and then, a milk-maid, a country woman going to church or market, a

peasant, or a game-keeper, might be seen traversing the dry brown

expanse of grass, and but rarely deviating from a beaten path, which led

from one stile over the path wall to another. It was all somber and

monotonous: the very spirit of dullness seemed to hang over it; and the

clouds themselves--the rapid sportive clouds, free denizens of the sky,

and playmates of the wind and sunbeam--appeared to grow dull and tardy,

as they passed across the wide space open to the view, and to proceed

with awe and gravity, like timid youth in the presence of stern old age.

Enough of the outside of the house. Let me take you into the interior,

reader, and into one particular room--not the largest and the finest;

but one of the highest. It was a little oblong chamber, with one window,

which was ornamented--the only ornament the chamber had--with a decent

curtain of red and white checked linen. On the side next the door, and

between it and the western wall, was a small bed. A walnut-tree table

and two or three chairs were near the window. In one corner stood a

washing-stand, not very tidily arranged, in another a chest of drawers;

and opposite the fire-place, hung from nails driven into the wall, two

or three shelves of the same material as the table, each supporting a

row of books, which by the dark black covers, brown edges, and thumbed

corners, seemed to have a right to boast of some antiquity and much use.

At the table, as you perceive, there is seated a boy of some fifteen

years of age, with pen and ink and paper, and an open book. If you look

over his shoulder, you will perceive that the words are Latin. Yet he

reads it with ease and facility, and seeks no aid from the dictionary.

It is the "Cato Major" of Cicero. Heaven! what a book for a child like

that to read! Boyhood studying old age!

But let us turn from the book, and examine the lad himself more closely.

See that pale face, with a manlike unnatural gravity upon it. Look at

that high broad brow, towering as a monument above the eyes. Remark

those eyes themselves, with their deep eager thought; and then the gleam

in them--something more than earnestness, and less than wildness--a

thirsty sort of expression, as if they drank in that they rested on, and

yet were unsated.

The brow rests upon the pale fair hand, as if requiring something to

support the heavy weight of thought with which the brain is burdened. He

marks nothing but the lines of that old book. His whole soul is in the

eloquent words. He hears not the door open; he sees not that tall,

venerable, but somewhat stiff and gaunt figure, enter and approach him.

He reads on, till the old man's Geneva cloak brushes his arm, and his

hand is upon his shoulder. Then he starts up--looks around--but says

nothing. A faint smile, pleasant yet grave, crosses his finely cut lip;

but that is the only welcome, as he raises his eyes to the face that

bends over him. Can that boy in years be already aged in heart?

It is clear that the old man--the old clergyman, for so he evidently

is--has no very tender nature. Every line of his face forbids the

supposition. The expression itself is grave, not to say stern. There is

powerful thought about it, but small gentleness. He seems one of those

who have been tried and hardened in some one of the many fiery furnaces

which the world provides for the test of men of strong minds and strong

hearts. There has been much persecution in the land; there have been

changes, from the rigid and severe to the light and frivolous--from the

light and frivolous to the bitter and cruel. There have been tyrants of

all shapes and all characters within the last forty years, and fools,

and knaves, and madmen, to cry them on in every course of evil. In all

these chances and changes, what fixed and rigid mind could escape the

fangs of persecution and wrong? He had known both; but they had changed

him little. His was originally an unbending spirit: it grew more tough

and stubborn by the habit of resistance; but its original bent was still

the same.

Fortune--heaven's will--or his own inclination, had denied him wife or

child; and near relation he had none. A friend he had: that boy's

father, who had sheltered him in evil times, protected him as far as

possible against the rage of enemies, and bestowed upon him the small

living which afforded him support. He did his duty therein

conscientiously, but with a firm unyielding spirit, adhering to the

Calvinistic tenets which he had early received, in spite of the

universal falling off of companions and neighbors. He would not have

yielded an iota to have saved his head.

With all his hardness, he had one object of affection, to which all that

was gentle in his nature was bent. That object was the boy by whom he

now stood, and for whom he had a great--an almost parental regard.

Perhaps it was that he thought the lad not very well treated; and, as

such had been his own case, there was sympathy in the matter. But

besides, he had been intrusted with his education from a very early

period, had taken a pleasure in the task, had found his scholar apt,

willing, and affectionate, with a sufficient touch of his own character

in the boy to make the sympathy strong, and yet sufficient diversity to

interest and to excite.

The old man was tenderer toward him than toward any other being upon

earth; and he sometimes feared that his early injunctions to study and

perseverance were somewhat too strictly followed--even to the detriment

of health. He often looked with some anxiety at the increasing paleness

of the cheek, at the too vivid gleam of the eye, at the eager nervous

quivering of the lip, and said within himself, "This is overdone."

He did not like to check, after he had encouraged--to draw the rein

where he had been using the spur. There is something of vanity in us

all, and the sternest is not without that share which makes man shrink

from the imputation of error, even when made by his own heart. He did

not choose to think that the lad had needed no urging forward; and yet

he would fain have had him relax a little more, and strove at times to

make him do so. But the impulse had been given: it had carried the youth

over the difficulties and obstacles in the way to knowledge, and now he

went on to acquire it, with an eagerness, a thirst, that had something

fearful in it. A bent, too, had been given to his mind--nay, to his

character, partly by the stern uncompromising character of him to whom

his education had been solely intrusted, partly by his own peculiar

situation, and partly by the subjects on which his reading had chiefly

turned.

The stern old Roman of the early republic; the deeds of heroic

virtue--as virtue was understood by the Romans; the sacrifice of all

tender affections, all the sensibilities of our nature to the rigid

thought of what is right; the remorseless disregard of feelings

implanted by God, when opposed to the notion of duties of man's

creation, excited his wonder and his admiration, and would have hardened

and perverted his heart, had not that heart been naturally full of

kindlier affections. As it was, there often existed a struggle--a sort

of hypothetical struggle--in his bosom, between the mind and the heart.

He asked himself sometimes, if he could sacrifice any of those he knew

and loved--his father, his mother, his brother, to the good of his

country, to some grave duty; and he felt pained and roused to resistance

of his own affections when he perceived what a pang it would cost him.

Yet his home was not a very happy one; the kindlier things of domestic

life had not gathered green around him. His father was varying and

uneven in temper, especially toward his second son; sometimes stern and

gloomy, sometimes irascible almost to a degree of insanity. Generous,

brave, and upright, he was; but every one said, that a wound he had

received on the head in the wars, had marvelously increased the

infirmities of his temper.

The mother, indeed, was full of tenderness and gentleness; and doubtless

it was through her veins that the milk of human kindness had found its

way into that strange boy's heart. But yet she loved her eldest son

best, and unfortunately showed it.

The brother was a wild, rash, reckless young man, some three years

older; fond of the other, yet often pleased to irritate--or at least to

try, for he seldom succeeded. He was the favorite, however, somewhat

spoiled, much indulged; and whatever was done, was done for him. He was

the person most considered in the house; his were the parties of

pleasure; his the advantages. Even now the family was absent, in order

to let him see the capital of his native land, to open his mind to the

general world, to show him life on a more extended scale than could be

done in the country; and his younger brother was left at home, to pursue

his studies in dull solitude.

Yet he did not complain; there was not even a murmur at his heart. He

thought it all quite right. His destiny was before him. He was to form

his fortune for himself, by his own abilities, his own learning, his own

exertions. It was needful he should study, and his greatest ambition for

the time was to enter with distinction at the University; his brightest

thoughts of pleasure, the comparative freedom and independence of a

collegiate life.

Not that he did not find it dull; that gloomy old house, inhabited by

none but himself and a few servants. Sometimes it seemed to oppress him

with a sense of terrible loneliness; sometimes it drove him to think of

the strange difference of human destinies, and why it should be

that--because it had pleased Heaven one man should be born a little

sooner or a little later than another, or in some other place--such a

wide interval should be placed between the different degrees of

happiness and fortune.

He felt, however, that such speculations were not good; they led him

beyond his depth; he involved himself in subtilties more common in those

days than in ours; he lost his way; and with passionate eagerness flew

to his books, to drive the mists and shadows from his mind. Such had

been the case even now; and there he sat, unconscious that a complete

and total change was coming over his destiny.

Oh, the dark workshop of Fate! what strange things go on therein,

affecting human misery and joy, repairing or breaking shackles for the

mind, the means of carrying us forward in a glorious cause, the

relentless weights which hurry us down to destruction! While you sit

there and read--while I sit here and write, who can say what strange

alterations, what combinations in the most discrepant things may be

going on around--without our will, without our knowledge--to alter the

whole course of our future existence? Doubtless, could man make his own

fate, he would mar it; and the impossibility of doing so is good. The

freedom of his own actions is sufficient, nay, somewhat too much; and it

is well for the world, aye, and for himself--that there is an overruling

Providence which so shapes circumstances around him, that he cannot go

beyond his limit, flutter as he will.

There is something in that old man's face more than is common with

him--a deeper gravity even than ordinary, yet mingled with a tenderness

that is rare. There is something like hesitation, too--ay, hesitation

even in him who during a stormy life has seldom known what it is to

doubt or to deliberate: a man of strict and ready preparation, whose

fixed, clear, definite mind was always prompt and competent to act.

"Come, Philip, my son," he said, laying his hand, as I have stated, on

the lad's shoulder, "enough of study for to-day. You read too hard. You

run before my precepts. The body must have thought as well as the mind;

and if you let the whole summer day pass without exercise, you will soon

find that under the weight of corporeal sickness the intellect will flag

and the spirit droop. I am going for a walk. Come with me; and we will

converse of high things by the way."

"Study is my task and my duty, sir," replied the boy; "my father tells

me so, you have told me so often, and as for health I fear not. I seem

refreshed when I get up from reading, especially such books as this. It

is only when I have been out long, riding or walking, that I feel

tired."

"A proof that you should ride and walk the more," replied the old man.

"Come, put on your hat and cloak. You shall read no more to-day. There

are other thoughts before you; you know, Philip," he continued, "that by

reading we get but materials, which we must use to build up an edifice

in our own minds. If all our thoughts are derived from others gone

before us, we are but robbers of the dead, and live upon labors not our

own."

"Elder sons," replied the boy, with a laugh, "who take an inheritance

for which they toiled not."

"Something worse than that," replied the clergyman, "for we gather what

we do not employ rightly--what we have every right to possess, but upon

the sole condition of using well. Each man possessed of intellect is

bound to make his own mind, not to have it made for him; to adapt it to

the times and circumstances in which he lives, squaring it by just

rules, and employing the best materials he can find."

"Well, sir, I am ready," replied the youth, after a moment of deep

thought; and he and his old preceptor issued forth together down the

long staircase, with the slant sunshine pouring through the windows upon

the unequal steps, and illuminating the motes in the thick atmosphere we

breathe, like fancy brightening the idle floating things which surround

us in this world of vanity.

They walked across the park toward the stile. The youth was silent, for

the old man's last words seemed to have awakened a train of thought

altogether new.

His companion was silent also; for there was something working within

him which embarrassed and distressed him. He had something to tell that

young man, and he knew not how to tell it. For the first time in his

life he perceived, from the difficulty he experienced in deciding upon

his course, how little he really knew of his pupil's character. He had

dealt much with his mind, and that he comprehended well--its depth, its

clearness, its powers; but his heart and disposition he had not scanned

so accurately. He had a surmise, indeed, that there were feelings strong

and intense within; but he thought that the mind ruled them with

habitual sway that nothing could shake. Yet he paused and pondered; and

once he stopped, as if about to speak, but went on again and said

nothing.

At length, as they approached the park wall, he laid his finger on his

temple, muttering to himself, "Yes, the quicker the better. 'Tis well to

mingle two passions. Surprise will share with grief--if much grief there

be." Then turning to the young man, he said, "Philip, I think you loved

your brother Arthur?"

He spoke loudly, and in plain distinct tones; but the lad did not seem

to remark the past tense he used. "Certainly, sir," he said, "I love him

dearly. What of that?"

"Then you will be very happy to hear," replied the old man, "that he has

been singularly fortunate--I mean that he has been removed from earth

and all its allurements--the vanities, the sins, the follies of the

world in which he seemed destined to move, before he could be corrupted

by its evils, or his spirit receive a taint from its vices."

The young man turned and gazed on him with inquiring eyes, as if still

he did not comprehend what he meant.

"He was drowned," said the clergyman, "on Saturday last, while sailing

with a party of pleasure on the Thames;" and Philip fell at his feet as

senseless as if he had shot him.

The International Monthly, Volume 2, No. 1, December, 1850 · 第 1 / 9 章