CHAPTER XV.

The Service of Prayer. III. The Litany . . . . . . . . . 153

Ancient Litanies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

Rogation Litanies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

Structure of the Litany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

i. Our cry to Christ, 159. ii. Our cry to the Father, 170.

iii. Appeal for help, 171. iv. Pressing anxieties of

the moment, 172. v. Final Commendation of our

prayers to Christ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

_Appendix C. Lessons in the Day Hours_ . . . . . . . . . . 173

_Appendix D. Pliny's Letter to Trajan_ . . . . . . . . . . 174

_Appendix E. The addition of Filioque_ . . . . . . . . . 176

_Appendix F. Greek origin of Litanies_ . . . . . . . . . . 177

_Tables of Dates_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179

Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183

{1}

CHAPTER I.

EXTEMPORE WORSHIP AND FORMS OF WORSHIP.

There is no such special merit in monotony as to require that the

worship of God should be conducted wholly in one method rather than in

several. Rather it must be acknowledged that there is merit in variety

if it be subjected to dignity and order. For a certain measure of

variety arrests and engages the attention of the worshippers and

sustains their interest.

VARIATIONS OF WORDS AND PHRASES. Much has been said from time to time

concerning Extempore Prayers and Extempore Praise, as opposed to those

which are more carefully prepared and agreed upon.

The discussion has been somewhat confused by the misuse of the word

Extempore. Prior to the invention of Printing every one who had to

conduct Services was required to know them by heart, so as to be able

to say them without book. The fact that he used no book did not make

the prayers extempore. In like manner one who is about to conduct the

prayers of a Congregation may carefully prepare his subjects, phrases,

and words, so as to avoid disorder in the subjects and unfitness in the

words. His prayers in that case are not strictly extempore.

{2}

If however he determines to leave the order of subjects and the choice

of words and phrases to the impulse of the moment, his thoughts may

travel too fast, or too slowly, or too irregularly for the essential

result: for the blessing which Christ promised is to those who _unite_

in worship. (S. Matth. xviii. 19, 20.)

When a few people gather together with the same difficulties,

temptations, dangers, sins, successes, a truly extempore prayer may be

made by one of them without creating any discord of desire amongst the

rest: but as soon as the congregation begins to include men and women

of different occupations, tempers, ideas, talents--if moreover the

persons for whom intercessions should be made are widely scattered and

very variously employed--it becomes necessary to supplement by careful

preparation the impulses of any one who leads the worship of a

congregation. There is also great advantage in choosing the best

phrases for expressing and including the worship of all.

We cannot doubt that the earliest prayers of the Collect form had local

colouring; but those which have survived for our use are so expressed

as to include many local applications, and a very great variety of

circumstances.

Further, it will be clear that an extempore prayer may be part of a

form of Service, just as much as a printed prayer. If the Service is

composed of, The short Prayer, a Lesson, the long Prayer, the Sermon

and several Hymns at fixed, or unfixed, places, the Service is a form.

The description of the Holy Communion in the time immediately after the

death of S. John the Evangelist (Justin Martyr, _Apology_ i. 65-67, {3}

see p. 58) shows us a form which provided for the essentials of such a

service, with prayers, praises, lessons, offertory, Consecration,

Communion, in order, although he who conducted the Service had a

certain amount of liberty in using parts of it.

We may assume then that forms are good, and that it is good to have

preparation and order and chosen phrases. The next question is how to

provide for that Variety which shall sustain interest and engage the

mind of the worshipper in the great business of his Service.

We may consider Variety of method, Variety of singing, and Variations

in the component parts of the Service.

(_a_) Variety of Method. The worshippers are divided into two or more

parties who take up their parts alternately, or together. It is

evident that such a division may be made in many ways. Those which

have been adopted in former times have resulted in the survival of five

Varieties for general Congregations [see chap. III. f.].

(_b_) Variety in Singing. There were of old four methods of singing

the Psalms:

1. Direct or Choral. 2. Antiphonal. 3. Responsorial. 4. Continuous.

1. The _Direct_ or Choral Singing was done by the whole choir:

2. The _Antiphonal_ by the two halves of the choir alternately:

3. The _Responsorial_ by the Priest and choir alternately:

4. The _Continuous_ by the Priest alone.

{4}

A careful study of the Rubrics will show that great liberty is allowed

in the Prayer Book in respect to the singing.

There is a Rubric in the Morning Service which prescribes the manner of

saying or singing Gloria Patri, viz. that it is to be Responsorial.

The order is that after the Morning and Evening Canticles _As it was in

the beginning_, &c. is to be an answer to _Glory be to the Father_, &c.

And this order may be found also after the Versicles of Mattins and

Evensong, _O Lord, open thou our lips_. It might be inferred from this

that the Psalms and Canticles were intended to be sung in the same way.

But it is more likely that it was designed to continue an ancient

freedom of choice which is now represented in our custom of using the

Antiphonal Method when we sing, and the Responsorial when we say them.

The division of Gloria Patri into two verses was, no doubt, intended in

any case. The Prayer Book does not recommend the fourth method; many

rubrics indicate that the congregation should take a substantial share

in the services with voice and heart.

(_c_) Variations in the Component Parts of Services.

1. Praise and Prayer.

2. Variations;

from Service to Service,

" Day to Day,

" Week to Week,

" Morning to Evening,

" Season to Season.

{5}

CHAPTER II.

ORIGIN OF MORNING AND EVENING PRAYER.

The Services in the Prayer Book may be roughly classed as (1) those

which are used every week: and (2) those which are used more rarely.

The principal service is the Holy Communion; which is provided with a

special Collect, Epistle and Gospel for each week, and for Holy Days of

special importance as being connected with the Lord's life on earth, or

with His immediate disciples.

The weekly Collection, enjoined by S. Paul in the churches of Galatia

and Corinth (1 Cor. xvi. 2), suggests that the Holy Communion was from

the first the usual Sunday Service. And this is confirmed when we find

S. Paul making a rapid journey from Greece to Jerusalem (Acts xx. 16),

but waiting seven days at Troas so as to be with the disciples there

upon the _first day of the week, when they came together to break

bread_ (Acts xx. 6, 7): cf. also a similar sojourn at Tyre on the same

voyage (Acts xxi. 4). But the Holy Communion was not the only regular

Service. Peter and John went to the Temple (Acts iii. 1) _at the hour

of prayer, being the ninth hour_. _Peter went up upon the housetop to

pray_ (Acts x. 9) _about the sixth hour_.

{6}

Cornelius saw the vision _about the ninth hour_ (Acts x. 3). _They

were all together in one place_ (Acts ii. 1) upon the day of

Pentecost--and it was _the third hour of the day_ (Acts ii. 15). These

hours may have been suggested to them as Christians by the solemn

scenes of the crucifixion of our Lord (S. Mark xv. 25, 33, &c.)[1].

The constant sense of responsibility and danger tended, of course, to

the frequent assembling for united prayer. It was natural to adopt

some such method as that in Psalm lv. 17, evening, morning and noon

(cf. Daniel vi. 10).

To these were added others: in the 3rd century for example we hear of

one at dawn and one at sunset: the former, being especially a praise

service, came to be known as _Lauds_ or _Mattin-lauds_; the latter was

soon called _Vespers_ (vesper=evening).

In the 4th century we hear of two more, making up the _seven times a

day_ of Psalm cxix. 164. During this growth of daily services there is

sometimes a {7} doubt whether the night Service is included in the

reckoning: but eventually we find for the daytime Mattin-lauds, Prime,

Terce, Sext, None, Vespers, and Compline.

The precise time of each is not defined by its name. If Mattins (i.e.

Lauds) was not finished when Prime was due, these two Services were

united.

But the office for Terce might be said at the 2nd hour or at the 3rd:

and in like manner Sext belonged to any of the three hours before 12;

and None to the three hours between 12 and 3.

Thus the day was divided into portions of three hours each: each

portion had its own Service, named from its close, but said at a

variable time according to the appointment of the Ordinary[2]. The

tendency was to appoint an early part of the three hours for the

Service; and this is visible in the word 'noon,' if it is true that 12

o'clock is so named from the custom of saying None at that time.

_Compline_ (completorium) is so called from its completing the services

of the day.

It will be noted that many of the names of Church Officers and many

other terms having a technical Church meaning are Greek in their

derivation. Archangel, Angel, Bishop, Priest, Deacon, Church,

Ecclesiastical, Apostle, Prophet, Martyr, Baptism, Epistle,

Evangelical, are instances of this; and many languages show by these

and other terms that Christian Churches derive much of their

organization from times and places where the Greek tongue was prevalent.

{8}

It might be thought perhaps that the Latin derivation of the names of

the Day Hour services would imply a more local and a Western Source for

these Hours of Prayer. But some of them are, as we have shown, very

early in their origin, and indeed there is evidence from books that

something of the same order was very early observed in the Eastern

parts of Christendom also.

This frequency of Services had a great charm for men who lived together

and worked together in communities, with no great distance between

their work and their Church, and who were able to fit their day's tasks

and necessary meals to the intervals between the Services.

It was not so suitable for mixed occupations or for isolated houses:

and as populations increased, it became evident that a less frequent

assembly would be more conducive to united worship.

GENERAL SCHEME OF THE DAY HOURS.

We will not enter into the minute differences of structure which are

found in one or other of the Day Hours. The following list will show

the order of a Service which is nearly identical with each of them.:

Our Father, &c.

Versicles.

Hymn.

Several Psalms divided into portions by

_Glorias_ and _Antiphons_.

{9}

Several Lessons divided by Responses.

Canticles.

Lesser Litany. Our Father, &c.

Versicles.

Creed.

Versicles.

Confession.

Collects.

Thus they followed the general division of worship into Praise and

Prayer. By enlarging one portion and diminishing another a special

character was given to certain Services. Thus Lauds was made joyful by

having many psalms.

The chief Lessons from the Bible were read in the Mattins Service when

it was said before Lauds. The union of those two Services resulted in

the omission of many of the Psalms. (See Preface "Concerning the

Service of the Church" in our Prayer Book.)

The Day Hour Services were not precisely alike even in their outline:

but they had a certain similarity which suggested the plan which has

been adopted in the Morning and Evening Services of the Book of Common

Prayer.

There were always two parts,--Praise: and Prayer.

[3]Each of these parts began with the Lord's Prayer. The Praise part

always had something of the nature of Psalms and Lessons: the Prayers

always had Collects. The Praises had Praise-versicles and the Prayers

had Prayer-versicles. Also as time went on Litanies became usual for

special days of the week.

{10}

It was easy therefore to recast the seven Services in the shape which

they now have.

_Praise_. The Lord's Prayer.

Versicles.

Psalms.

Lessons.

Creed.

_Prayers_. The Lord's Prayer.

Versicles.

Collects.

Thanksgivings.

NAMES AND TITLES.

The Services of our Church were translated into English in 1549. Many

alterations were made at that time.

The seven Day Hours were combined into two Services--Mattins and

Evensong: the Holy Communion Service was assimilated in some respects

to Eastern Liturgies: the rules of variation for days and seasons were

simplified: interruptions were avoided by the omission of many Verses

and Responds, Antiphons, &c.: better provision was made for continuous

reading of Holy Scripture.

The change from Latin, which had once been a commonly-spoken language,

to the language spoken in England is the alteration which produced the

greatest effect upon congregational worship, and the smallest amount of

difference in the worship itself: for if you understood both languages

it would not matter to you which of them you used.

{11}

The Latin prayers had been known by their first words. Just as we now

know a prayer as _Our Father_, or a doxology as _Glory be to the

Father_, so formerly they were known as _Pater Noster_, and _Gloria

Patri_. Some of these titles have survived. _Credo_ (_I believe_) has

been shortened into _Creed_. We use as a Creed the Hymn _Quicunque

vult_ (Whosoever will). The Canticles still are known by their first

words in Latin, _Te Deum, Benedicite_, &c., and so is the 95th Psalm,

_Venite, exultemus Domino_.

The _Lesser Litany_ is a name given to the three petitions,

_Lord, have mercy upon us._

_Christ, have mercy upon us._

_Lord, have mercy upon us._

They are used before the Lord's Prayer as an Invocation of the Holy

Trinity.

We proceed to examine the foundation of this order in worship.

The model bequeathed to us by Our Lord is known to us as _The Lord's

Prayer_, often called "_Our Father_" from the first words.

[1] Haec sunt septenis propter quae psallimus horis:

Matutina legat Christum qui crimina purgat.

Prima replet sputis. Causam dat Tertia mortis.

Sexta cruci nectit. Latus ejus Nona bipertit.

Vespera deponit. Tumulo Completa reponit;

which may be translated:

Seven are the hours at which we sing and pray;

Mattins for Christ who takes our sins away,

Prime shows Him mocked, and Terce says why He died.

Sext shows His Cross, and None His pierced side.

Vespers His taking down commemorates,

And Compline how they buried Him relates.

Thus day by day we sing and pray Christ and Him crucified.

[2] The Ordinary, i.e. the Ordinary judge in such matters, viz. the

Bishop.

[3] See p. 16.

{12}

CHAPTER III.

THE MODEL.

THE LORD'S PRAYER.

"After this manner therefore pray ye." S. Matth. vi. 9.

The pronouns used in the Lord's Prayer are 'Thy,' 'us,' 'our.' It is

the voice of a people speaking to God. Even in private we may not pray

for self alone; we must include our friends, neighbours, and all others.

For this reason the Lord's Prayer is singularly adapted to the services

of a congregation. Its petitions are short and direct, and therefore

easily thought by every one at the same moment. This is an important

point, because unity of intention is the essence of congregational

worship. (S. Matth. xviii. 19, 20.)

Notice the order of the pronouns in the seven petitions:

( Hallowed be Thy Name.

Thy. ( Thy Kingdom come.

( Thy Will be done.

( Give us this day our daily bread.

( Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive

Us, our. ( them that trespass against us.

( Lead us not into temptation.

( Deliver us from evil.

{13}

There are, it appears, two motives which prompt a man to worship God.

One of these is God; Man himself is the other.

a. Two Kinds of Worship.

Worship means 'worthiness,' and thence 'regarding anyone as worthy.'

For this reason a magistrate is called 'his worship'; and a guild or

company is called 'worshipful.' In the Marriage Service the man says

to his wife "I thee worship" because he sets her before all else. In

Wyclif's Bible (S. Matth. xix. 19) we find "Worschipe thi fadir and thi

moder." In old days _any act of mind or body acknowledging the

worthiness of another was an Act of Worship_. In later days the word

'Worship' has been limited.

_Limitation_ 1. Since God alone is perfectly worthy, worship is now

ascribed usually to God alone: _any act of mind or body acknowledging

the worthiness of God may still be called an Act of Worship_. For

instance, in Col. iii. 17-iv. 1, the duties of mankind in daily life

are set forth as a constant acknowledgment of the presence of God. The

repetition of the word (_kurios_) meaning 'Lord' and 'master'--10 times

in 10 verses--falls on the ear like a peal of bells, calling us to make

daily life an unbroken Worship of God.

_Limitation_ 2. We ought not to forget that life is all one piece; and

that the word Worship should describe what we do and say outside our

prayers, as well as what we say and think in prayer and praise. The

word is, however, more commonly limited to words and thoughts. These

two limitations lead us {14} to a second definition of worship as

_words and thoughts which acknowledge the worthiness of God_. We have

nearly abandoned the word as describing the honour paid by one creature

to another, and but rarely use it of acts of the body.

God is always the object of Worship: but the subject of worship is

two-fold--we may speak of ourselves or we may speak of our God. When

we chiefly think of God in worship we call it Praise: when we chiefly

think of ourselves we call it Prayer.

These are then the two kinds of Worship--Praise and Prayer. It is

evident that the Lord's Prayer teaches us to put Praise in the higher

place.

b. Praise and Prayer.

Praise. There are two ways in which respect is paid to a man, viz. (1)

Outspoken praise, (2) Deference to his words. In like manner we praise

God (1) by dwelling with joy and gladness on His perfections; and (2)

by listening with reverence to His Word.

Prayer, on the other hand, is that kind of worship which acknowledges

God as the Source of all our help. Our needs are necessarily in our

minds when we pray. We think of them in order to ask Him to help us;

and we think of them again when we thank Him for the help which we have

already had.

Thanksgiving might be coupled with Praise because its aim is to glorify

God: but as its motive is the thought of human wants which have been

already supplied, Thanksgiving is placed with the Prayers, which also

relate to human wants.

{15}

We must therefore expect to find in Worship;

I. Praise. (1) Declaration of God's excellence.

(2) Attention to His Word.

II. Prayer (3) Petitions for grace and help.

(4) Thanksgivings for grace and help.

c. Intention and Setting.

The same words may serve for Praise and for Prayer. The plainest

meaning of "Hallowed be Thy Name" is Praise to God. But it may be also

a Prayer to Him to cause His Name to be hallowed. If we have no reason

to the contrary, we shall use the Lord's Prayer as an act of Praise and

Prayer--Praise in its first three petitions, Prayer in its last four.

If, however, we want to ask Him to cause His Name to be hallowed and

His Kingdom to come and His Will to be done, we can turn it all into a

prayer.

This direction of our minds into a certain channel is called

'Intention'.

We have already said that Unity of Intention is the essence of

congregational worship. Hence the Intention must be the same in all

the worshippers if they use words suitable for both Praise and Prayer.

If one is saying "Hallowed be Thy Name" and thinking chiefly of God's

holiness, his Intention will be different from that of a neighbour who

is thinking chiefly of the wickedness of sin. We need some agreement,

that our intention may be the same.

This agreement might have been left to the knowledge of those who take

part in the Service. They might have been expected to learn what the

intention is, at each place when the Lord's Prayer is said. Or it

might {16} have been stated in a Rubric, or direction, at the head of

the Prayer. Neither of these methods is adopted in the Book of Common

Prayer. Instead of them, the Prayer itself is so arranged as to

proclaim the Intention.

When it is to be used for Praise, the words "_for thine is the kingdom,

the power, and the glory, for ever and ever_" are placed at the end:

when it is to be used for Prayer, the Lesser Litany "_Lord have mercy

upon us, Christ have mercy upon us, Lord have mercy upon us_" is placed

at the beginning.

It is convenient to call this the 'setting'.

When the Lord's Prayer is 'set' for Praise, every petition in it is to

be said with that _intention_. We shall then unite in praising God for

the glory of His holy Name, the majesty of His Kingdom, the power of

His Will, and also as the Giver, the Forgiver, the Leader and

Deliverer. The thought of our weaknesses will be as much as possible

left out, that we may rejoice in the perfections of God.

In like manner, when the Lord's Prayer is 'set' for Prayer, the thought

of human wants will be present in every petition. We have great need

to pray that God will cause His Name to be hallowed, His Kingdom to

come, and His Will to be done, on earth as in heaven, as well as to ask

Him for the necessaries of life, the forgiveness of sins, guidance, and

deliverance from evil.

d. The key-note of Prayer and Praise.

"When ye pray, say, Our Father, &c." S. Luke xi. 2.

We can now understand why the Lord's Prayer is used twice in the same

Service. The Praises begin with it and the Prayers begin with it. The

setting of {17} the Lord's Prayer will always proclaim what kind of

Service is beginning[1]. Thus the Lord's Prayer is made to strike the

key-note of the Service, or part of a Service, to which it is prefixed.

e. Forms of Worship.

We have seen that Unity of Intention is necessary to congregational

worship. When a few people, animated by the same sentiments, are drawn

together by one motive, and incur the same dangers, it matters little

whether they use a form of worship or not. Whatever words are used in

their name, their unity of intention is secured by the fact that they

have no diversity of desires.

If the small body becomes a large one and times grow peaceful,

diversity of desires will destroy unity of worship unless they adopt a

form.

Forms of worship should, if possible, unite the most diverse features

of character, occupation, danger, trial, suffering, joy, &c. in the

expressions of Praise or Prayer which are common to them all. Local

colouring and personal references are admissible only when they arouse

a common emotion. The Lord's Prayer {18} is in this, as in other

respects, an ideal Form of Worship.

Christian Worship began amongst people who were already accustomed to

Forms. The Jews had Psalms for Worship (1 Chron. xvi. 4-43), and two

Lessons in their Synagogue Service (Acts xv. 21, First Lesson: Acts

xiii. 27, Second Lesson). The two Lessons were followed by the

Exhorter (Acts xiii. 15; St Luke iv. 16, 17).

The word _Amen_, being Hebrew, gives further evidence of the derivation

of the first Christian forms from the Synagogue Services, with, of

course, a Christian character infused into them (1 Cor. xiv. 15, 16;

cf. Deut. xxvii. 15-26).

Amen, as a Hebrew adjective, means _firm, faithful_; and, as an adverb,

_verily_, or, as the Catechism explains it, _so be it_. "Its proper

place is where one person confirms the words of another, and adds his

wish for success to the other's vows and predictions" (Gesenius). Each

of the first four Books of the Psalms ends with it--see Psalms xli.,

lxxii., lxxxix., cvi.

For some time the first Christians were able to resort to the Temple

and Synagogues, and both worship and teach there (Acts ii. 46, iii. 1,

3, 8, 11, v. 12, 21, 25, 42: xiii. 5, 14, xiv. 1, xvii. 1, 2, xix. 8).

They were joined by a number of the Priests (Acts vi. 7) whose help in

arranging the services would bring a considerable influence in the same

direction. At Ephesus (Acts xix. 9) a division arose in the Synagogue,

causing S. Paul and the Christian disciples to remove into a school.

At Corinth, for a similar {19} reason, they set up the Christian

worship in the next house to the Synagogue, and the Ruler of the

Synagogue went with them (Acts xviii. 7, 8). It is not very surprising

that under these circumstances they derived some of their forms of

Worship from the Synagogue.

Forms assist the mind to take its due part in the worship which we

offer to the Almighty. Worship is offered with body, mind and spirit.

If one of these encroaches on the others, their share is in danger. If

the tongue and the knees and the hands are too much engaged in it, the

mind grows weary or idle. If the mind is too busily employed, the

spirit has a diminished share, or the body is indolent. It is

necessary to provide occupation for the mind, but not to occupy it in

following great mental efforts for which it is unprepared. If the mind

is unprepared, it no sooner reaches one point than it has to follow the

speaker to another; and thereby the spirit loses its power of speeding

the utterance to the throne of God.

f. Worship-Forms.

(See Table, p. 21. Cf. Chap. I, p. 3.)

We find that, in the Services, shares are distributed to the

worshippers in five different ways, which may be called Worship-forms.

The Table on p. 21 should be carefully studied. Hooker's description

of them (E. P. v. xxxix. 1) is a little difficult to make out; but it

will be found to verify our table. (See Appendix A, pp. 22, 23.)

{20}

Walter Travers was Reader at the Temple Church in London, when (1585)

Richard Hooker was appointed to be Master of the Temple. Travers had

been a friend and favourite of Thomas Cartwright, a severe critic of

the Order and Discipline of the Church of England. Travers took up the

criticisms, and so attacked Hooker that the latter in self-defence

wrote his Books on _The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity_ (1592), wherein

he replies to Cartwright's and Travers' criticisms.

The Worship-forms have been in use for so long that it is scarcely

possible to discuss their origin. The traces of them in the Bible are

interesting:

1. Amen. 1 Cor. xiv. 16; Rev. xxii. 20.

2. Responsorial or Interjectional. S. Luke ii. 13, 14.

3. Anthem. Exodus xv. 21; Isaiah vi. 3.

4. Litany.

5. Preceded. Exodus xxiv. 7, xix. 7, 8, xx. 18-21.

The Prayer Book furnishes examples of Praise and Prayer in each Form,

excepting the Litany Form, which is used only for Prayer. But there is

no reason why that also should not be used for Praise: the 136th Psalm

will show how this might be done.

{21}

THE FIVE KINDS OF WORSHIP FORMS

(See Hooker, _Eccl. Pol._ v. xxxix. 1.)

Examples-- Examples--

Prayer Praise

1. The Minister AMEN form The Collects Prayer of

offers and the Consecration

People endorse in Holy

it Communion (see

1 Cor. xiv. 16)

2. Minister and Responsorial, Hymn at Sursum Corda

People pursue or Ordination of in Holy

different lines INTERJECTIONAL Priests Communion

interrupting form Preces before Versicles

one another Collects before

Psalms

3. The Congregation Antiphonal, "From our The Psalms

form two or ANTHEM enemies, &c." in Mattins

companies which form --8 verses in and

reply to one the Litany Evensong

another

4. The Minister LITANY The main body

names the subject form of the Litany

and the People

offer the prayer

(or praise)

5. A portion of PRECEDED The Lesson and

Holy Scripture prayer or Commandments Canticle

is read and the praise in Holy

prayer or praise Communion

completes it as

an Act of Worship

{22}

APPENDIX A.

Cartwright, attacking the Prayer Book, 1572 or later, wrote--

"For the singing of Psalms by course and side after side, although it

be very ancient yet it is not commendable, and so much the more to be

suspected for that the Devil hath gone about to get it so great

authority, partly by deriving it from Ignatius' time, and partly in

making the world believe that this came from heaven, and that the

Angels were heard to sing after this sort," &c.

To this Hooker (_Eccl. Polity_, v. xxxix. 1) replies--

"And if the prophet David did think that the very meeting of men

together and their accompanying one another to the House of God should

make the bond of their love insoluble, and tie them in a league of

inviolable amity (Ps. lv. 14); how much more may we judge it reasonable

to hope that the like effects may grow _in each of the people towards

other_, in them [Sidenote: Anthem] all towards their pastor, and in

their pastor towards every of them, between whom there daily and

interchangeably pass, in the hearing of God Himself, and in the

presence of His holy Angels, so many heavenly acclamations,

exultations, provocations, petitions, songs of {23} comfort, psalms of

praise and thanksgiving: in all which [Sidenote: Amen] particulars, as

when _the pastor maketh their suits and they with one voice testify a

general assent thereunto; or when he joyfully beginneth, and they with

like alacrity follow_, dividing [Sidenote: Interjection] between them

the sentences wherewith they strive which shall most show his own and

stir up others' zeal, to the glory of that God whose name they magnify;

[Sidenote: Litany] or _when he proposeth unto God their necessities,

and they their own requests for relief in every of them; or when he

lifteth up his voice like a trumpet_ to proclaim unto them the laws

[Sidenote: Preceded] of God, _they adjoining_, though not as Israel did

by way of generality, a cheerful promise, 'All that the Lord hath

commanded we will do,' yet that which God doth no less approve, that

which savoureth more of meekness, that which testifieth rather a

feeling knowledge of our common imbecility, _unto the several branches

thereof several lowly and humble requests_ for grace at the merciful

hands of God to perform the thing which is commanded; or when they wish

reciprocally each other's ghostly happiness, or when he by exhortation

raiseth them up, and they by protestation of their readiness declare he

speaketh not in vain unto them; these interlocutory forms of speech,

what are they else, but most effectual, partly testifications, and

partly inflammations, of all piety?"

[1] There are two or three apparent exceptions which on examination

prove the rule. At the beginning of the Communion Service the

intention is so plain and the _Lord have mercy_ is repeated so often

with the Commandments, that it is left out before the Lord's Prayer.

At Baptism and Confirmation there is no setting, probably because the

Thanksgiving close of those services has the character of both Praise

and Prayer: and this certainly is the effect of the double setting in

the Churching Service.

{24}

CHAPTER IV.

MORNING AND EVENING PRAYER.

It must not be supposed that these Services were composed suddenly in

their present shape. They are indeed formed on the pattern given by

the Lord's Prayer; and they make use of the methods which we have

described--Intention, Setting, Key-note, Worship-forms--which have

always been the methods used by the Church as far back as we have any

evidence. But from time to time alterations have been made in the

details. The Lord's Prayer has, for example, been used as a key-note

for Praise without its Doxology; or Confession has been placed amongst

the Prayers; or Psalms have been more used, and Lessons less used. In

spite of such variations, the general principles may be traced in all

Church Services; and much interesting study may be spent on the

comparison of our Services with those which preceded them.

We have already said something (Chap. II.) about this, and when we

study these two Services in detail, it is very important to remember

that they grew out of the older Services. The daily Psalms and Lessons

{25} might be rearranged, the number of versicles increased or

diminished, the rule about varying the saying of a Creed, or an

Alleluia, might be altered: but it is the same pattern with the same

methods of worship now, as it was when the Services were all said in

Latin and when each Diocese in this country had some differences from

all the other Dioceses.

We will now proceed to consider these two Services in their details.

THE ORDER FOR

MORNING AND EVENING PRAYER,

DAILY TO BE SAID AND USED THROUGHOUT

THE YEAR.

_The Morning and Evening Prayer shall be used in the accustomed Place

of the Church, Chapel, or Chancel: except it shall be otherwise

determined by the Ordinary of the Place. And the Chancels shall remain

as they have done in times past._

_And here is to be noted, that such ornaments of the Church, and of the

Ministers thereof, at all times of their Ministration, shall be

retained, and be in use, as were in this Church of England, by the

authority of Parliament, in the second year of the reign of King Edward

the Sixth._

The importance of the above heading has been lost sight of, through the

manner of its printing. In most Prayer Books it will be found on a

page by itself or at the foot of a Table of the Golden Numbers. It is

really the heading of a chapter which contains both {26} Morning and

Evening Service. Until the last Revision of the Book in 1662, the

chapter containing Morning and Evening Prayer was closed after the

Athanasian Creed with a Rubric _Thus endeth the Order of Morning and

Evening Prayer throughout the whole Year_. Although that Rubric has

been omitted, this heading includes both Services in one Chapter.

EVENING PRAYER] This part of the chapter, prior to 1662, was not

printed out in full; only the variations from Morning Prayer were set

forth.

DAILY TO BE SAID AND USED] See Preface--_And all Priests and Deacons

are to say daily the Morning and Evening Prayer, either privately or

openly . . . the Curate . . . shall say the same in the Parish Church

or Chapel where he ministereth_.

ornaments of the Church] The Canons of 1604 order a number of things

to be provided at the charges of the parish, which may be included

under this head, such as Communion Table, Pulpit, Reading-desk, Font,

Alms-chest, Alms-basin, Vessels for Holy Communion, Bible, Common

Prayer Book, Book of Homilies, Parchment Register Book and Coffer. It

would not be easy to make a complete list of things authorised by this

Rubric and elsewhere.

and of the Ministers thereof] The discussion of the meaning of the

Ornaments of the Ministers belongs chiefly to the Communion Service.

There has been no question that for Morning and Evening Service a

Surplice and Hood are ordered to be worn.

the second year of the reign of King Edward the Sixth] The reference

is to the {27} statute of the year 1548-9, whereby the first (English)

Revision was enabled to be enforced by law. Edward VI.'s reign began

on Jan. 29, 1547. This statute passed the House of Lords on Jan. 15th,

1548-9, and is referred to in the statute of 1552 as belonging to the

second year of King Edward VI., although the session lasted into his

third year.

THE ORDER FOR MORNING PRAYER, DAILY THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

This fresh heading is necessary because the former included the Order

for Evening Service. Morning and Evening Prayer (called also Mattins

and Evensong: see Table of Proper Lessons) are two divisions of the

same chapter.

These two Services are very much alike. The map on the next page shows

their construction.

An examination of this map will show that the plan of the Lord's Prayer

is closely followed. There are two parts and an introduction. Of the

two parts Praise comes first, as in the Lord's Prayer.

Each of the two parts begins with the Lord's Prayer, which is arranged

with a setting so as to mark the character of what follows.

Every piece of the Praise portion is set with a Praise-Termination, or

Doxology: and this portion includes both kinds of Praise, viz.

Outspoken Praise, and Reverent Hearing of God's Word. In like manner

the Prayer portion includes the two kinds of Prayer, viz. Petition for

the wants of men, and Thanksgiving for what they have received.

{28}

Thus these two Services are formed in obedience to the rule that we are

to take the Lord's Prayer as our model (S. Matth. vi. 9).

INTRODUCTION.

TEXT and SERMON on Confession.

The act of CONFESSION.

GOD'S ANSWER to Confession.

PRAISE.

_Praise-terminations_

THE LORD'S PRAYER . . . . . . Thine is the kingdom.

( 1. Interjected Verses )

PSALMS ( 2. xcv. (at Mattins) ) Gloria Patri.

( 3. Special, i.--cl. (as )

( appointed) )

LESSONS ( 1. Old Testament . . . Canticle 1 or 2,

( 2. New Testament . . . Canticle 3 or 4.

THE APOSTLES' CREED . . . . . . Amen.

PRAYER.

THE LORD'S PRAYER.

PRECES or Interjected Verses anticipating the Collects.

( 1. for spiritual needs,

COLLECTS ( ANTHEM or Choral Prayer uniting the

( two kinds of Collect,

( 2. for physical needs and earthly relations.

{29}

In 1552 the Introductory portion was prefixed. _Confession_, which

formerly occurred in the Prayers, had been omitted in 1549. It now

forms the Introduction.

The reason for this beginning is set forth in a short sermon which is

usually known as the _Exhortation_, and has, like other sermons, a

Text, commonly known as a _Sentence_ (see Rubric at the head of the

Sentences). This is in accordance with very ancient custom[1], and

with the very natural sense that man must receive permission before he

approaches God.

God's answer to Confession is The _Absolution_ or _Remission_ of Sins.

As an illustration of this we may think of Esther, when she went to

make her petition of the King (Esther iv. 2, v. 1-3). The King

extending his sceptre gave her permission to speak.

The Sentences

are 11 verses, chosen, 5 from the Psalms, 4 from the Prophets, 2 from

the Gospels, 1 from the Epistles. They represent either man's cry to

God (Nos. 2, 3, 7, 9, 10) or God's call to man (Nos. 1, 4, 5, 8, 11) or

both (No. 6).

{30}

The Exhortation.

_The Scripture moveth us_] The Sentences supply 11 such places, but

there are many more to be found in the Bible. The word "moveth" has

the same meaning as when a resolution is moved at a meeting.

_When we assemble and meet together_ in Church] Four reasons are

given, viz. the four great occupations of Worship, without regard to

their order in the Service. We have already pointed out that

_Thanksgiving_ and _Prayer_ spring from the sense of man's wants and

his dependence on God; and that the _Reading of God's Word_ in these

Services is not for study but for _Praise_. We shall therefore find

the Thanksgiving after the Prayers, and the Lessons (or Lections) of

Holy Scripture amongst the Praises.

The Confession.

The capital letters indicate that this was to be, as it were, dictated

to the people, sentence by sentence: and the Rubric implies the same.

It will be remembered that books were scarce when this Rubric was

prepared. Literal obedience to it is often very impressive, and a real

addition to the solemnity of the act. On ordinary occasions in some

Churches, the Minister leads the Confession without the formal

separation of each clause from the next.

The expressions, used here to acknowledge the wickedness of sin and the

defects of human life, will seem to be excessive whenever we are making

light of {31} our faults. But in proportion as we realise the

perfection of God's holiness, we shall find them suitable to every

shade of defect and sin.

The comprehensive humility of this Confession is designed to include

both modified faults and grave offences--whether by commission,

omission or indolence. The full acknowledgment of the different forms

of sin is followed by prayer for mercy and recovery, relying upon the

promises declared in Jesus Christ.

The Absolution.

As God's answer to Confession, this is pronounced by God's own

messenger. The messenger must have full credentials; i.e. a Deacon

must not say the Absolution.

Both here and in the Confession, the _Titles and Attributes_ of God

should be noticed. His power and mercy were made the grounds of our

appeal to Him. His mercy and authority are now made the grounds of His

answer. The fulness of the declaration of them gives emphasis to the

declaration of pardon which follows.

We find four parts in the Confession and the same parts in the

Absolution, viz.

1. The Title and Attributes of God.

2. The substantial part, i.e. Confession or Absolution.

3. The prayer which is founded thereon.

4. The appeal through our Lord.

{32}

Rubrics.

Before the invention of printing (15th century), the directions in Law

Manuscripts had been written in red, in order to distinguish them from

the Statutes. This distinction had been made also in Service Books and

it has been continued to our own time. But every sheet which contains

both black and red letters requires to be twice passed over a printing

press. Hence, for cheap books, italics are used instead of red letters

to distinguish the directions from the prayers, &c. The directions are

called Rubrics (from Lat. _ruber_=red) whether the distinction is made

by the colour or the type.

The rubrics about the Confession and the Absolution were in 1662 made

more clear. The habit had grown up in some churches for the Priest to

say the Absolution kneeling. The word _all_ was therefore inserted in

the rubric about Confession, and the words _standing, the people still

kneeling_ were added to the rubric about Absolution. Thus _all

kneeling_ includes the minister.

This Introductory Part of the Service was composed for the Revision of

1552, and was then printed only in the Morning Service, with a rubric

ordering it to be used _at the beginning of Morning Prayer, and

likewise of Evening Prayer_. In 1662 it was first printed out in full

in the Evening Service, and the rubric was altered to agree therewith.

_Simplification of rubrics_. One aim of the Revisers was simplicity of

rules. As they sought Variety of worship without excess, so they

desired Order of {33} worship without complexity of regulations.

Anyone, looking casually over the Prayer Books of the Sarum and other

Uses before 1549, will be struck at once by the redness of many of the

pages. This redness indicates rubrics, and helps us to realise what is

meant in the Prayer Book Preface (Concerning the Service of the Church,

Section 2) by _the number and hardness of the rules called the Pie, and

the manifold changings of the Service_[2].

In order to provide for the many occasions when a difference was to be

made, rubrics had been multiplied and inserted at the places to which

they applied. The Revisers (1) collected as many as possible at the

beginning of each Service, or at the end; and (2) reduced the number of

rubrics thus collected together, by reducing the number of variations

which were to be provided for.

Duplication of Phrases.

It has often been noticed that pairs of words having nearly the same

meaning frequently occur in the Prayer Book. This doubling of an idea

may be called 'Duplication'.

Duplication is of two kinds: either the words coupled together are so

nearly identical in meaning that one is but a repetition of the other;

or else the {34} second word shows an advance upon the first. The

former kind may be called 'parallel duplication' and is used for

emphasis: the latter kind may be called 'progressive duplication',

because it is used to represent the living idea which advances even

while it is being uttered. Instances of both abound in this part of

the Service, as well as in the Collects and other prayers which we

shall notice later on.

Examples of Duplication.

1. _Exhortation_.

Parallel. _goodness_ and _mercy_.

_assemble_ and _meet together_.

Progressive.

( _acknowledge_ . . . . . suggesting reluctance.

( _confess_ . . . . . . . " willingness.

( _sins_ . . . . . . . . . the outward act.

( _wickedness_ . . . . . . the inward fault.

( _dissemble_ . . . . . . pretend they are not there.

( _cloke_ . . . . . . . . cover them up.

( _requisite_ . . . . . . what we should like.

( _necessary_ . . . . . . what we must have.

( _pray_ . . . . . . . . . ask earnestly.

( _beseech_ . . . . . . . " more earnestly.

( humble, lowly ( attitude with regard ) Distrust

( ( to the past ) of Self.

(

( penitent ( attitude with regard ) Shame for

( ( to the present ) sin.

(

( obedient ( attitude with regard ) Resolution

( ( to the future ) to leave

( ) the sin.

{35}

2. _Confession_.

Parallel. _erred_ and _strayed_.

Progressive.

( _device_ . . . . . . . . . . an act of the mind.

( _desire_ . . . . . . . . . . an act of the heart.

( _left undone_ . . . . . . . Omission.

( _done_ (wrongly) . . . . . . Commission.

Cf. _sins, negligences and ignorances_ Litany.

( _spare_ . . . . . . . . . . with regard to the past.

( _restore_ . . . . . . . . . " " " the future.

( _godly_ . . . . . . . . . . duty to God.

( _righteous_ . . . . . . . . " " man.

( _sober_ . . . . . . . . . . " " self.

3. _Absolution_.

Parallel. _declare_ and _pronounce_.

_truly_ (with truth), _unfeignedly_ (without pretence).

Progressive.

( _death_ . . . . . . . . . . Life is something more than

( _turn and live_ . . . . . . the absence of death.

( _power_ . . The Priest . . may pronounce.

( _commandment_ . . must "

( _Absolution_ . . . . . . . . unloosing.

( _Remission_ . . . . . . . . putting away.

( _pardoneth_ . . . . . . . . (Fr. _pardonner_) God forgiveth.

( _absolveth_ . . . . . . . . (Lat. _absolvo_) God looseth the

sinner.

( _repent_ . . . . . . . . . . looking at Self.

( _believe_ . . . . . . . . . " " God.

{36}

( _pure_ . . . . . . . . . . . absence of evil.

( _holy_ . . . . . . . . . . . presence of good.

( _repentance_ . . . . . that our present lives may

( please God.

( _God's Holy Spirit_ " our remaining lives

( may please Him.

It will be clear that if we keep from sin repentance is more intimately

connected with our present lives than with the future. Yet both

repentance and the gift of the Holy Spirit are required for life now

and hereafter.

[1] S. Basil, _ad Clerum Neoc. Ep._ 63, Tom. 2, 843 D, quoted by

Wheatley, says that "the primitive Christians in all Churches,

immediately upon their entering into the House of Prayer, made a

confession of their sins to God with much sorrow and concern and tears,

every man pronouncing his own confession with his own mouth."

So Ezra (ix. 5, 6, &c.) and Daniel (ix. 1-19) approached God with

Confession.

[2] The Pie. Three explanations are offered of this word. (1)

_pi_=the first letter of the word _pinax_ _a chart_, i.e. the Table of

Lessons, &c. (2) Pie,--as in magpie, piebald,--from the two colours of

the page. (3) Litera picata--the pitch-coloured letter--which began

each several order in the rules.

The title of the Sarum Breviary makes Pie equivalent to Breviary or

Portiforium. The most attractive derivation is that which associates

it with the Greek word for a chart or map.

{37}

CHAPTER V.

PRAISE.

I. The Psalms.

Every part of the Praise portion of the Service has a

Praise-Termination. We have already seen that the "intention" of the

Lord's Prayer is marked for praise by a Termination, viz. _for thine is

the kingdom, the power and the glory for ever and ever_.

This praise-termination belongs to the Lord's Prayer, and is not used

for anything else. In like manner, other forms of praise have their

own terminations. Thus Psalms and Lessons are used for praise and have

praise-terminations.

When a Psalm is used for praise, its termination is _Glory be to the

father_, &c.

When a Lesson is used for praise, its termination is a Canticle--i.e.

one of the Bible songs of praise (from the Latin _canticulum_, a little

song, a sonnet).

When the Creed is used for praise, since nothing can be added to the

facts of God's Being and Work except the will to recite them devoutly,

its praise-termination is _Amen_.

{38}

The first Lord's Prayer.

The Lord's Prayer may be regarded as a brief summary of the acts of

worship which come after it. Much care is required in order to use its

familiar words with due devotion. When it is used, as here, for

Praise, the following may be taken as examples of the thoughts which

should accompany its several phrases.

Our Father, God is Love.

Which art in heaven, God is a spirit.

Hallowed be Thy Name, God's Holiness.

Thy Kingdom come, God's Power.

Thy Will be done, God's Perfectness.

In earth as it is in heaven, Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord

God Almighty.

Give us this day our daily Every good gift is from

bread, above.

Forgive us our trespasses, The mercy of the Lord

is from everlasting to

everlasting.

Lead us not into temptation, Thou art about my path

and about my bed.

Deliver us from evil, With power He commandeth

the unclean spirits, &c.

The Ladder of Praise.

The various parts of the Praise portion of the Service are not

repetitions of the same ideas. We {39} have first, in the Psalms, the

simpler thoughts about God. The First Lesson, taken from the Old

Testament, advances to higher or more complex thoughts in Praise of

Him. The next stage is reached in the Second Lesson; and the Apostles'

Creed crowns the whole. Thus a _Ladder_ of praise is made whereby we

climb up to the thought of God in His Perfect Being, which is the very

essence of Real Worship.

The first steps in this ladder are made by the use of the Book of

Psalms, which is divided into sections for these daily Services, and so

arranged that they supply different Psalms for 30 mornings and 30

evenings. If there are 31 days in the month, those for the 30th day

are repeated on the 31st: in February, the (29th and) 30th are omitted.

There are many words which originally meant a Song, but in course of

time have come to mean a special kind of song, or the music which

belongs to a song. Thus _Cantus_, a song, gives us _Chant_, the music

of a psalm verse; and _Canticle_, a psalm after a Lesson. _psalmos_, a

song, gives us _psalm_, a hymn, but not metrical, _hymnos_, a song,

gives us _hymn_, a song in metre.

Versicles and Psalms.

Before the Psalms begin there is an injunction to praise the Lord

exchanged between the Minister and the People. Four other Versicles

and Gloria Patri are interposed after the Lord's Prayer--all in the

form of Verse and Respond.

{40} Ps. li. 15 is the Psalmist's grateful cry when his sin was

forgiven and his praises began to break forth.

Ps. lxx. 1 supplies the second couplet.

The _Gloria Patri_ follows these Psalm verses.

The Venite exultemus Domino, briefly called _Venite_, is the 95th

Psalm. The Rubric provides that it is to be said every day, but not

twice on the 19th day[1]. It is the first of the Morning Psalms, and

formerly was sung with an Anthem (see Chapter XIII.) which was known as

the Invitatory, and varied with the Season.

Antiphonal, i.e. alternate, singing dates from the services described

in 1 Chronicles vi. 31-33, 39, 44, from which it appears that there

were three choirs of singers--one in the centre, and one on either

hand. Thus the interchange of replies from either side and a chorus of

all the voices were provided, 1 Chron. xvi. 7-9 makes it clear that the

Psalms were sung, as indeed the word Psalm (from Gr. _psallo_, I sing)

implies. See also Neh. xii. 24.

The Authorised Version (A.V.) of the Bible is a translation made at the

beginning of James I.'s reign, after the Hampton Court Conference (Jan.

1604). It was published in 1611 with a title-page stating that it was

"appointed to be read in churches." There is, however, no evidence of

any formal adoption of it until the statement made in the Preface of

the {41} Prayer Book (1662) that "such portions of Holy Scripture as

are inserted into the Liturgy," "in the Epistles and Gospels

especially, and in sundry other places . . . are now ordered to be read

according to the last Translation." It is evident that this "last

Translation" is the Version of 1611: for the Epistles and Gospels are

quoted from it in the Prayer Book of 1662. The Translation of 1611,

then, is that from which are to be taken "such portions of Holy

Scripture as are inserted into the Liturgy." This appears to be the

_general_ rule of the Prayer Book of 1662. But that Prayer Book gives

authority to various exceptions. The most notable of these is the

provision, in a footnote to _The order how the Psalter is appointed to

be read_, "that the Psalter followeth the division of the Hebrews and

the translation of the great English Bible, set forth and used in the

time of King Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth."

If it be asked why the words of the Psalms should be sung as in the

Great Bible when other translations have superseded it for Lessons,

there is an easy answer. Books were not cheap or common in the 16th

and 17th centuries. Many people had sung them so often as to know them

by heart. A comparison of the Bible and Prayer Book translations will

show that there was no large gain to be set against the loss of

congregational worship which must have resulted from changes. The

Bishops' Bible supplanted the Great Bible in 1568, and the Authorised

Version was made in 1611. Both in 1604 and in 1662 the Revisers

decided to retain the Version of 1539-40 (the Great Bible) so far as

the Psalms and Canticles {42} were sung in the Churches. This is

plainly not an oversight in 1662, for the Revisers altered the words of

the note in the Preface, without changing the sense.

Psalms in Daily Services.

The Preface, "Concerning the Service of the Church," states that "the

ancient Fathers have divided the Psalms into seven portions, whereof

every one was called a Nocturn," and that "the same was . . . ordained

. . . of a good purpose and for a great advancement of godliness"; but

"of late time a few of them have been daily said and the rest utterly

omitted." A writer of the ninth century says that S. Jerome, at the

bidding of the Pope on the request of Theodosius, arranged the Psalms

for the Services of day and night in order to avoid the confusion

arising from variety of uses[2]. S. Ambrose was a contemporary of S.

Jerome but died more than 20 years before him. There are considerable

differences between the plan which S. Ambrose gave to his diocese of

Milan, and the plan which we may believe was generally given at the

same time to the Churches of the rest of Western Europe. But they are

similar in many respects. In both, a division was made between the

first 109 psalms,--which were mainly allotted to the night services,

i.e. to those which were afterwards called Mattins,--and the rest which

were mainly allotted to the Evening Service (Vespers). We suppose that

the division, mentioned in the {43} Preface, "into seven portions"

refers to those 109 Psalms.

Of these 109, 18 were used at other Services, leaving 91 for Mattins,

viz. 19 on Sunday and 12 each for the week days. The Ambrosian

arrangement of them was for a fortnight.

The Greek Church divides the whole Book into 20 portions and takes

them, two portions at Mattins and one at Vespers, beginning on Saturday

night, omitting Sunday Vespers, and taking, on Friday, the 19th, 20th

and 18th portions.

Thus we see that a weekly singing of the Book of Psalms is derived from

a very ancient time, when the division of the Eastern and Western

Churches of Europe had not occurred.

The Sarum order, which we suppose was that which is referred to in the

Preface as having been "corrupted" by omissions, had the 109 Psalms

allotted to Mattins, as above described. For Vespers, there were five

each day from cx.-cxlvii., omitting the 118th and 119th, 134th, 143rd

and, as explained below[3], reckoning the 147th as two. All these were

taken in order as they stand in the Bible. Those which were left out

were allotted to other Services, as, for instance, iv. to Compline,

lxiii. to Lauds, &c., &c. Psalm cxix. was to be said through every

day, 32 verses at Prime, and 48 verses each, at Terce, Sext and None.

{44}

Lauds was the great Praise Service of the day, and had a very beautiful

arrangement of its Psalms which always ended with one of the O.T. hymns

followed by Psalms cxlviii.-cl. The O.T. hymns on the seven days of

the week were _Benedicite_: Isaiah xii.: Isaiah xxxviii. 10-20: 1 Sam.

ii. 1-10: Exodus xv. 1-19: Hab. iii.: Deut. xxxii. 1-43.

The beauty of many of these arrangements is undeniable: but they were

rather intricate; and in practice they broke down.

Our revisers retained the underlying principles. By spreading the

course over 30 days they made it possible to use it all. They retained

the 95th Psalm as the first Psalm of every day; and also the principle

of having two daily Services at which Psalms occupied an important

place.

There are Special Psalms for six days in the year--the four great

Festivals, Christmas, Easter, Ascension, and Whitsun Day, and the two

great prayer-days, Ash-Wednesday and Good Friday. The Preface explains

that these Special Psalms are to be sung instead of the ordinary Psalms

on those days; and authorises the use of Special Psalms approved by the

Ordinary on other days.

In using the Book of Psalms as a book of worship we must remember what

was said of the _Intention_ of our minds in respect to parts of the

Services. There are many Psalms which supply us with the best Prayers

in trouble, penitence or any anxiety. But when using them in these

Services our Intention is not Prayer but Praise, and the thought of God

must inspire our devotions.

{45}

It will often help us if we remember that God's Righteousness is

infinite, as well as His Mercy. It is impossible for man in his

present state to reconcile perfect Righteousness and perfect Mercy: for

Righteousness will have nothing to do with sin, while Mercy forgives

it. These two characteristics of God are revealed to us through Christ

in Whom Righteousness and Peace are united; cf. Ps. lxxxv.

The Psalms, composed by various people at different times, very

frequently are the utterances of men in trouble: and they often sketch

the thoughts or actions of the Ideal Man, in one or other of the four

characters which answer to God's Righteousness and God's Mercy. For,

in response to God's Righteousness, man must be (1) perfectly

_penitent_, and (2) in imitation of God, must _detest sin_: in

imitation of God, (3) he must be perfectly _forgiving_, and in response

to God's mercy, (4) he must have _trust and peace_. The Psalmists

exhibit human nature at its best, but it is human nature all the

time--human nature finding God and associating itself with the Ideal

Man.

Thus the Psalms often rise to the conception of the Messiah; and, even

when that is not their thought, they proceed from other thoughts to

Rest in God and Praise of His Holy Name.

The most difficult Psalms for worship are those which regard sin with

horror, but express the horror without mercy. Man is unable to hold

the two qualities of Righteousness and Mercy simultaneously. We find

it difficult in these days to detest sin because we are learning the

quality of mercy.

{46}

Much of the poetic force of these songs depends on the local incidents

of Israel's history and the scenery of Jerusalem and the Holy Land.

While we use the words, we must also use our imaginations to transfer

the great thoughts to our own experience: for those local colours are

the clothing of thoughts which belong to all men in their relation to

God.

Over all these endeavours to use the Psalms properly in the Praise part

of our Services, the ruling idea is that which we have already stated,

viz. that God in these things is to be glorified.

[1] A practice is found, in some churches, of singing this Psalm on

Sundays but not when it is read in the ordinary course of the Psalms.

We believe that this is due to a misinterpretation of the Rubric.

There is just as much reason for singing it on the 19th as on any other

day.

[2] _Dict. of Chr. Antiq_. "Psalmody." H. J. Hotham.

[3] The "division of the Hebrews" (see Note in Preface on the Order of

the Psalter) is followed in our Prayer Book and Bible. The Septuagint

and Vulgate unite Psalms ix. and x. and divide cxlvii. into two psalms,

viz. _vv._ 1-11, _vv._ 12-20.

{47}

CHAPTER VI.

PRAISE.

II. The Lessons.

A. The Study of the Bible a help to worship.

The Bible is read in Church as an incentive to the praise of God. It

supplies thoughts of God which are then offered up to Him, as Praise,

in the words of the Canticles. It is therefore necessary that we

should _understand_ the Bible Lessons as well as our abilities will

allow, and that we should _endeavour_ to find in those Lessons

everything which will inspire us to honour and love God.

There are two distinct requirements. A book may help us to

_understand_, but the _endeavour_ to find God in the Bible depends on

ourselves: our Lord has described it in the words _He that hath ears to

hear let him hear_.

In order to understand the Bible when we hear it read, we should study

it at home. Some elementary aids to the study of it may be useful

here; for further help we shall want books specially prepared for that

{48} purpose, such as the Cambridge Companion to the Bible and The

Cambridge Bible for Schools, &c.

1. The Old Testament and the New Testament agree together: they have

the same principles of morality, worship and doctrine. God's guidance

of the writers is seen in this--the Old Testament, written at different

times in the centuries before our Lord was Born, was such that the

Gospel of the Revelation in Jesus was able to fit into it. As S.

Augustine says,

"Novum Testamentum in Vetere latet,

Vetus Testamentum in Novo patet."

See also Article VII.

2. The failure of man to live well is shown in the Old Testament.

Though he had favourable conditions and a holy law of life, a pure

system of worship, and the discipline of warning and correction, the

Israelite failed. Hence the Old Testament continually teaches (_a_)

that God governs, (_b_) that man needs a Saviour.

3. The Old Testament consists of 3 parts (_a_) the Law and History,

(_b_) the Psalms and Proverbs, (_c_) the Prophets.

(_a_) The Law and History part includes the books from Genesis to

Esther, and relates the progress of the people of God from its

separation as a family and its growth to be an important nation, to the

downfall of its independence, and its partial recovery. The writers

were a succession of prophets, who continually point to the hand of God

in the events which they record.

(_b_) The Psalms and Proverbs part includes the books from Job to the

Song of Solomon, and contains {49} many Hymns of prayer and praise;

also discussions of deep problems of human nature and our relation to

God (Job and Ecclesiastes); together with other things which stir us to

a life of goodness and worship.

(_c_) The Prophets are not arranged in order of time at which they

lived. The four Books which come first are called the Four Greater

Prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel: and are followed by the

Twelve Lesser Prophets. To find the place in the Lesser Prophets it is

sufficient to remember Hosea, Joel, Amos as the three which are placed

first; and Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi as the three prophets after

the Captivity, and therefore placed last. Isaiah should be read with

parts of Kings and Chronicles, and Haggai and Zechariah with the Books

of Ezra and Nehemiah; and others in like manner according to their

period.

4. The New Testament consists of 3 parts--(_a_) The History, (_b_) The

Epistles, (_c_) The Revelation of St John.

(_a_) _S. Luke's_ History is in two volumes--the Gospel, which recounts

our Lord's Life from His Birth to His Ascension (note here the number

of His Parables): and the Acts of the Apostles, which continues the

history from His Ascension to the (first) imprisonment of S. Paul at

Rome. _S. Matthew's_ Gospel corresponds to S. Luke's Gospel,

recounting our Lord's Life from His Birth, with many of His sayings

about the Kingdom of Heaven, and especially the Sermon on the Mount.

_S. Mark's_ Gospel is similar to the two former. It recounts

particularly the details of the various scenes of our Lord's Life, {50}

and shows how frequently He retired for meditation,--"a living picture

of a living man[1]." _S. John's_ Gospel, written long after the

others, shows the three witnesses--the spirit and the water and the

blood--that bear record that Jesus is the Son of God (1 S. John v. 8).

(_b_) The Epistles are not in chronological order. S. Paul's Epistles

are placed first, then S. James, S. Peter, S. John and S. Jude. Of S.

Paul's Epistles, those to Churches come before those to Timothy, Titus

and Philemon. Of his Epistles to Churches, the order in the Bible is

Rom., Cor., Cor., Gal., Ephes., Philip., Col., Thess., Thess. They fit

into the History in the following groups: (I) Acts xvii.,--1 and 2

Thess,, (II) Acts xix. 22 to xx.,--1 and 2 Cor., Gal., Romans, (III)

Acts xxviii.,--Philip., Col., Ephes., Philemon, (IV) _after_ the

imprisonment described in Acts xxviii.,--1 and 2 Tim. and Titus. The

Epistles to Colossians, Ephesians and Philemon (a Colossian Christian)

seem to have been sent by the same messenger. The Epistle to the

Hebrews may have been written by S. Paul; but, as that is doubtful, it

has been placed after those which are surely his. The Epistles which

follow are called "General," because they are addressed to Christians

scattered about in various countries. S. James and S. Peter have many

references to the Sermon on the Mount. S. John dwells upon Love as the

foundation upon which a Christian builds his life--the Love which God

has shown us, and the Love which we have for Him and for one another.

{51}

(c) The Revelation of S. John, written perhaps before the time when

Jerusalem was besieged (A.D. 68-69), carries our thoughts away from the

glories of the Jerusalem which was about to be destroyed, to the New

Jerusalem and its glories, in Jesus Christ and His Church.

5. The Apocrypha supplies First Lessons for 21 days between Oct. 27 and

Nov. 18; and also for the evenings of Innocents' Day and S. Luke's Day.

Article VI. quotes S. Jerome's description of the Apocrypha, where he

says "the other books the Church doth read for example of life and

instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any

doctrine."

These notes will, we hope, prompt the reader to make a study of the

Bible not only for the guidance of his life, but also for the amendment

of the offering which he makes to God in the Services of the Church.

B. Lessons and Lectionaries.

Acts xv. 21. "Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach

him, being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath Day." The reference is

to the Mosaic regulations which were to a certain extent to be observed

by all Christians, out of consideration for those Christians who were

also Jews: _be sure that thou eat not the blood, for the blood is the

life_ was a precept which would create a difficulty in a Jewish

Christian's mind if a Gentile Christian disregarded it. Similarly as

to meats offered to idols (cf. 1 Cor. viii. 10-13).

There was then in the Synagogues of the first century a "First Lesson"

from the Law.

{52} Acts xiii. 27. "The voices of the prophets which are read every

Sabbath Day." There was then in the Synagogues a "Second Lesson" from

the Prophets.

Acts xiii. 15. "After the reading of the Law and the Prophets the

rulers of the Synagogue sent unto (Paul and his companions), saying, Ye

men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people,

say on."

The passage selected from the Law was associated with a passage

selected from the Prophets--there was a Lectionary for Sabbath

Services. The present Jewish Lectionary associates Isaiah i. 1-28 with

Deut. i. 1-iii. 22 as the Lessons for the Sabbath of Temple

Desolation[2].

In S. Paul's Exhortation which followed (_vv._ 16-41) there are, in

_vv._ 17-19, three words rarely found in the Bible, but of their rare

use one ("exalted") is found in Is. i. 2, and the others in Deut. i.

31, 38 ("suffered their manners" and "gave for an inheritance").

The reference, in _v._ 20, to "judges" is also to be noted in

connection with Is. i. 26. Bengel reasons that we may safely conclude

that the two Lections on that day were those which we have just

mentioned as associated together in the present Jewish Lectionary[3].

S. Luke iv. 15-20. Jesus . . . taught in their Synagogues--came to

Nazareth--"entered, as his custom was, into the synagogue on the

sabbath day, and stood {53} up for to read. And there was delivered

unto him the book of the prophet Esaias." It appears from what follows

(_vv._ 17-20) that the Lord read Isaiah lxi. 1, 2, either instead of

the appointed passage from Isaiah, or after He had read the appointed

passage. For Isaiah lxi. does not now appear in the Jewish Lectionary,

and we know no reason for its omission now, if it was included before.

In any case what He said about it, He said as the Exhorter[4]. They

divided the Law into 53 or 54 portions, and read the whole of them

between one Feast of Tabernacles and the next, whether the Sabbaths

were 50 or more. Each portion was divided into seven parts, read by

seven different Readers (a Priest and a Levite being the first two).

This Lesson apparently stood alone until in B.C. 163 Antiochus

Epiphanes forbade the use of the Pentateuch. Lessons from the Prophets

were used instead, and were not discontinued when the use of the

Pentateuch was restored. Thus arose a practice of having a First

Lesson from the Law, which they called Parascha (or, _Division_), and a

Second Lesson from the Prophets, called Haphtarah (or, _Conclusion_).

The word _Holy_ was said before and after the First Lesson and a

Doxology before and after the Second Lesson--an arrangement similar to

our own. We may, indeed, believe that we derived from the Jews this

and other uses of our Services. For we read in Acts vi. 7 that a great

company of the priests were obedient to the faith, and {54} in Acts

xviii. 7, 8 that at Corinth, when they ceased to be able to go to the

Synagogue, the ruler of the Synagogue himself went with them to the

worship and teaching which they carried on in a house hard by. It

would not be surprising, then, if the worship thus begun was arranged

after the old pattern to which they were all accustomed. For there

are, not a few, proofs in the Acts of the Apostles that in those early

days they attended the Services of the Temple at Jerusalem, and of the

Synagogues in other places.

Justin Martyr[5], writing in defence of Christianity to the Emperor of

Rome, describes the Holy Communion Service of his time as comprising

two Lessons--one from the Prophets and the other from the Apostles,

i.e., we suppose, the Gospels; a stage nearer to the two New Testament

Lessons which are read at the Communion now. The use of an Old

Testament and a New Testament Lesson at Daily Prayers may be a survival

of the intermediate stage as described by Justin.

A Lectionary is a Table of Lessons arranged for a year. Our Table of

Epistles and Gospels is derived from one which has been attributed to

S. Jerome. The Sermons of his age show that there were stated Lessons

for particular days[6]. Moreover, certain variations in the

manuscripts of the New Testament are explained by the early use of

books in {55} which the Lessons for the days were written out in

full[7], called Lectionaries or Evangelistaria.

The principle which governs our own Lectionary is that the Bible shall

be read through[8]. The books are taken in order, beginning with

Genesis, S. Matthew, and Acts on January 2, and going straight on, with

two exceptions. First exception: Isaiah's clear prophecies of Messiah

are deferred to Nov. 18 &c., so as to be read in Advent. Second

exception: Revelation is read in the latter half of December.

The effect of beginning the New Testament in two places on Jan. 2 is

that it is read twice through in the year--once at Morning Prayer and

once at Evening Prayer.

For Sundays a different arrangement is made with regard to the Old

Testament. The Sunday year begins with Advent, which is the season

occupying twenty-eight days before Christmas. Selections from Isaiah

are read on these four Sundays, on Christmas Day, and on the four or

five Sundays which usually follow Christmas before Septuagesima. At

Septuagesima we are anticipating Lent and the Passion: Genesis

therefore supplies the Lessons, followed by Exodus at Passion-tide, and

the other books in regular course.

To this brief description we may add that Proper Lessons, specially

chosen from Old and New Testament, are appointed for special Sundays

and special {56} Holy Days. These take the place of those which appear

in the regular list for the same days. If two special days coincide,

the minister may read the Lessons of either, except that, on Advent

Sunday, Easter Day, Whitsunday and Trinity Sunday, the Lessons for

those days are to be read.

The principles of this arrangement have been in use since 1549;

alterations in its details were made in 1559, 1604, and 1871.

In 1559 the Apocrypha was appointed for many of the Saints' Days, which

nevertheless were left with their Old Testament Lessons in the

Calendar. Thus these latter were invariably unread.

In 1604 this defect of the Calendar was corrected by moving the Lessons

forward to make room for the Proper Lessons, and omitting some few of

those which "might best be spared."

Until 1871 the New Testament was read through _thrice_ in the year, the

Lessons being usually whole chapters. And the Gospels were always

Morning Lessons, and the Epistles and Acts always Evening Lessons.

Revelation was almost altogether omitted.

From 1604 till 1871 the First Lessons from Sept. 28 until Nov. 23 were

from the Apocrypha--eight weeks. The Apocrypha Lessons continue now

only from Oct. 27 to Nov. 18.

The principle of selection has in all these changes been recognised;

but always subordinate to a larger principle of reading in Church the

whole Bible. Prior to 1871 the two Books of Chronicles were not read,

being regarded as sufficiently represented by the corresponding

chapters from the Books of the Kings. In {57} 1871 eighteen Lessons

from the Chronicles were introduced in place of the corresponding

passages in the Kings.

We shall find in the next chapter that all these Lessons in Church are

to be thought of in connection with their attendant Canticles--so that

a Lesson and its Canticle form an act of Praise: "as after one angel

had published the Gospel (S. Luke ii. 10-12) a multitude joined with

him in praising God, so when one minister hath read the Gospel, all the

people glorify God" (S. Luke ii. 13, 14)[9].

Rubric. _Then shall be read distinctly_, &c.] The words of this

rubric were altered to some extent in 1662, the only notable change

being the alteration of "The minister that readeth" to "He that

readeth." The object of the change seems to be that one who is not

'the minister' may read the Lessons. The minister is still directed to

declare where they begin and end.

He is to turn himself so as to be heard: and Canon 80 requires the

churchwardens to provide a "Bible of the largest volume." A desk or

Lectern is therefore implied as one of the 'Ornaments of the Church.'

It is usually assumed that the Congregation sits during the Lessons

except when the Gospel is read in the Communion. Probably there were

not seats for them when the rubrics were drawn up: custom has

authorised their addition to the list of 'ornaments.' The movable

seats, bequeathed by incumbents to their successors or others as they

thought fit, are not recognised by any words in the Prayer Book.

{58}

APPENDIX B.

JUSTIN MARTYR, _Apol._ I. 61-67.

61. * * * We bring them where there is water; and after the same

manner of regeneration as we also were regenerated ourselves, they are

regenerated; for, in the Name of God, the Father and Lord of all

things, and of our Saviour Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Ghost, they

then receive the washing of water: for, indeed, Christ also said,

_Except ye be born again, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of

heaven_. * * * *

65. But after thus washing him who has professed, and given his assent,

we bring him to those who are called brethren; where they are assembled

together, to offer prayers in common both for ourselves, and for the

person who has received illumination, and all others everywhere, with

all our hearts, that we might be vouchsafed, now we have learnt the

truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the

commandments, that we may obtain everlasting Salvation. We salute one

another with a kiss when we have concluded the prayers: then is brought

to the President of the brethren, bread, and a cup of water and wine,

which he receives; and offers up praise and glory to the Father of all

things, through the Name of His Son, and of the Holy Ghost; and he

returns thanks at length, for our being vouchsafed these things by Him.

[Here follows a brief description of this special Eucharist after a

Baptism which we omit in order to give the longer description below.]

{59}

67. * * * And on the day which is called Sunday, there is an assembly

in the same place of all who live in cities, or in country districts;

and the records of the Apostles, or the writings of the Prophets, are

read as long as we have time. Then the Reader concludes: and the

President verbally instructs, and exhorts us, to the imitation of these

excellent things: then, we all together rise and offer up our prayers;

and, as I said before, when we have concluded our prayer, bread is

brought, and wine, and water; and the President, in like manner, offers

up prayers, and thanksgivings, with all his strength; and the people

give their assent by saying Amen: and there is a distribution, and a

partaking by every one, of the eucharistic elements (_ton

eucharistethenton_); and to those who are not present, they are sent by

the hands of the deacons * * *.

_Library of the Fathers. S. Justin's Works._

[Antoninus Pius, to whom Justin addressed his two Defences, was Emperor

of Rome from 138 to 161. The first of the two is that from which the

above quotation is taken: its date has been placed as early as A.D.

139, and as late as A.D. 150. Justin's Martyrdom has been dated A.D.

166. His description of Services refers therefore to the 50 years

which followed the death of S. John the Apostle.]

[1] Cambridge Companion.

[2] Speaker's Commentary on Isaiah, Appendix A.

[3] _etropophorese_ and _etrophophorese_. These two rare Greek words

differ from one another by a single letter which is _p_ in one and _ph_

in the other. The former has the best MS. authority: the latter ('bore

as a nurse') is probably right. But, in either case, S. Paul must have

had the Deut. passage in his thoughts.

[4] See Reland's _Hebrew Antiquities_.

[5] See Appendix B, p. 58.

[6] Thus S. Chrysostom regards Genesis as belonging to Lent, and

preached a homily to explain why the Acts are read in public between

Easter and Whitsunday. He also advises that the Saturday and Sunday

Lessons should be privately read during the previous week.

[7] Thus a few MSS. read "The end is enough" in S. Mark xiv. 41; "the

end" having been placed in a Book of Lessons, after the word "(It) is

enough," because the Lesson ended there. See Prebendary Scrivener's

Art. in _Dict. of Christian Antiq._ s.v. Lectionary.

[8] See Appendix C.

[9] S. Ambrose quoted by Hook, _Ch. Dict._ s.v. Hymn.

{60}

CHAPTER VII.

PRAISE.

III. Hymns in the Daily Services.

We are about to explain how Hymns are attached to Lessons for purposes

of worship. It will be well therefore to consider what a Hymn is, and

how we arrived at the present arrangement. We will defer to the

chapter on Anthems the consideration of those Hymns that may be

described as Prayers set to music. Many Psalms may be described in

this way, and in the Commination the 51st Psalm is used as a Prayer

(see the Rubric there). But if our intention be Praise, most of those

Prayer-psalms lend themselves to Praise, and are so used in this

Service before the Lessons, as we have just seen. In like manner

metrical Hymns are to be found in our Hymn-books which are in their

plain sense prayers rather than praises.

In the Day Hour Services we find metrical Hymns--at Lauds, Vespers and

Compline after the Bible "Chapter," and, at the other Services, before

the Psalms. They were in Latin, and some of them have been translated

and are known to us in our Hymn-books.

{61}

Of the Office Hymns well known in modern Hymn-books, _Now that the

daylight fills the sky is a good example_.

We have, moreover, in the Prayer Book itself, two translations of the

Hymn _Veni, Creator Spiritus_ formerly sung at Lauds throughout Whitsun

week.

The longer form of it, more a paraphrase than a translation, appeared

in the Ordination Services in 1550; the shorter translation, which is

so well known, in a Book of Devotions made by John Cosin in 1627, where

are found also translations of other Day Hour Hymns, the book being

designed from the Breviary.

When in 1661 Cosin had become Bishop of Durham and was taking a leading

part in the last revision of the Prayer-Book, his translation of _Veni,

Creator Spiritus_ was placed before the older paraphrase in the

Ordination Services.

It is interesting to compare the Day Hour Hymns with the translations

which are to be found in Hymn-books.

In _Hymns Ancient and Modern_, the following examples are found:--1, 9,

10, 11, 14, 15, 38, 45, 47, 55, 75, 85, 87, 88, 90, 95, 96, 97, 125,

128, 144, 152, 153, 156, 157, 158, 430, 483, 509, 622. The renderings

are not equally close; but they give a good idea of the place in

worship which they occupied in the Day Hours. They will be found to

dwell on the thoughts of praise to God called forth (_a_) by the

sunshine and the beauties of nature, (_b_) by the work of the Holy

Spirit. When the Hymn followed the Capitulum, a Canticle came next.

The Capitulum, or Little Chapter, was one or two verses from the Bible

specially {62} chosen for the day; and the Hymn was directly connected

in subject with it.

Thus, at Lauds on Whitsunday, the Capitulum was, _When the Day of

Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place_

(Acts ii. 1), and the Hymn which followed immediately was _Come, Holy

Ghost_ (H. A. and M. 157); and _Benedictus_, which came next, had an

Antiphon, _Receive ye the Holy Ghost_, &c. (S. John xx. 22, 23).

These beautiful combinations show us that the Canticle after a Lesson

is designed to respond to the message of the Lesson, and to make with

it an act of Praise. We must dismiss from our minds all idea that our

Services were put together in a zigzag fashion, introducing something

different as soon as any Psalm or Lesson has been said. The

Service-makers valued variety of expression and method within

reasonable limits; but the Service itself proceeds from point to point

in a regulated progress. When the metrical Hymns were struck out, the

Canticles and the Lessons were left united together.

The Canticles.

The word Canticle means "little song" or "little chant," just as

versicle means "little verse," and particle "little part."

It has long been used to signify the Hymns from the Old and New

Testaments which were introduced into the Christian Services.

It will be seen that these Bible hymns are affixed {63} to the Lessons.

They are commonly known by the words with which they begin in Latin:

thus

_Te Deum laudamus_=Thee God we praise.

_Benedicite, omnia Opera_--Bless ye, O all Works.

_Benedictus_=Blessed.

_Jubilate_=O be joyful.

_Magnificat_ (_mea anima_)=(My soul) doth magnify.

_Cantate Domino_=O sing unto the Lord.

_Nunc dimittis_=Now thou lettest depart.

_Deus misereatur_=God be merciful.

The 1st and 2nd chapters of S. Luke supply three of these; viz.

Magnificat, Benedictus, and Nunc dimittis. The Psalms supply three,

viz. Jubilate (100th), Cantate Domino (98th), and Deus misereatur

(67th).

_Benedicite, omnia, Opera_ is part of the Hymn given in the Apocrypha

as sung by Shadrach (Ananias), Meshach (Misael), and Abed-nego

(Azarias), when they walked in the burning fiery furnace.

_Te Deum laudamus_ is a very ancient Latin Hymn which may have been

already very old when it became associated with the name of S. Ambrose,

Bishop of Milan (375-397). We show its Bible origins in Chapter VIII.

The Canticles have been sung in the Services for many centuries.

_Benedictus_ and _Benedicite_ are found in the Holy Communion

Service--supposed to date about 600--of the Gallican Church; in the Day

Hours _Benedictus_ was sung at Lauds; _Magnificat_ at Vespers; _Nunc

dimittis_ at Compline; _Te Deum_ at Mattin-Lauds; _Benedicite_ and

_Jubilate_ at Lauds on Sundays.

{64}

The rearrangement of the Day Hours in 1549 gave an opportunity to

associate the Canticles more closely with the Lessons.

We show in another chapter the connection which exists between the

Lessons of the Old and New Testaments, and the alternative Canticles

provided for each, both at Morning and Evening Prayer.

Meanwhile it will be well to learn the following table.

MAP OF THE LESSONS AND THEIR CANTICLES.

Character of the Lesson Mattins Evensong

O. T. Creation and Providence Benedicite Cantate*

Need of Redemption Te Deum Magnificat

laudamus

N. T. The Coming of Christ Benedictus Nunc dimittis

The Spread of the Gospel Jubilate* Deus

misereatur*

* Added in 1552.

* * * * * * * *

THE TE DEUM PRINTED SO AS TO SHOW ITS STRUCTURE.

[Transcriber's note: In the original book, each of the following 13

items was printed on a single line. In this e-book, they have been

split at a logical point, usually a colon (:).]

1. TE Deum[1] laudamus, TE Dominum confitemur:

TE Aeternum Patrem[1] omnis terra veneratur.

2. TIBI omnes angeli, TIBI caeli et universae potestates:

TIBI Cherubim et Seraphim[2] incessabili voce proclamant.

3. SANCTUS SANCTUS SANCTUS DOMINUS DEUS SABAOTH[2]:

PLENI SUNT CAELI ET TERRA MAJESTATIS GLORIAE TUAE[2].

4. TE gloriosus Apostolorum chorus, TE Prophetarum laudabilis numerus:

TE Martyrum candidatus laudat exercitus.

5. TE per orbem terrarum sancta confitetur ecclesia:

Patrem immensae majestatis.

Venerandum tuum verum et unicum Filium.

Sanctum quoque Paracletum Spiritum.

6. TU Rex gloriae, Christe: TU Patris sempiternus es Filius.

7. TU ad liberandum suscepturus hominem non horruisti Virginis uterum:

TU devicto mortis aculeo aperuisti credentibus regna caelorum.

8. TU ad dexteram Dei sede(n)s in gloria Patris:

Judex crederis esse venturus.

9. TE ergo quaesumus famulis tuis subveni quos pretioso

sanguine redemisti:

Aeterna fac cum sanctis tuis in gloria munerari.

10. Salvum fac populum tuum Domine et benedic haereditati tuae[3]:

et rege eos et extolle illos usque in aeternum[3].

The Prayer Book Explained · 第 15 / 17 章