Volume I

All the evidences of what was to be Nietzsche's final and complete

philosophical work in four volumes, are contained in two volumes

of desultory and often highly condensed notes which were recently

issued under the single caption of "The Will to Power" _("Die Wille

zur Macht")._ On this culminating work Nietzsche had laboured from

1883 until his final breakdown. He made two plans for "The Will to

Power"--one in 1886 and the other in 1887. As the 1887 plan was the

one ultimately adhered to, there seems no reason to hesitate about

accepting it as the right one. The titles of the four books which

comprised this final work as it stands to-day are "European Nihilism,"

"A Criticism of the Highest Values that Have Prevailed Hitherto,"

"The Principles of a New Valuation" and "Discipline and Breeding."

These headings are according to the last plan made at Nice in 1887,

and although, as I stated in the preceding chapter, there was some

hesitation between the general title of "The Will to Power" and "The

Transvaluation of All Values," "The Antichrist," which fell under the

latter heading, must not be considered as forming a part of "The Will

to Power." However, "The Antichrist" and also "Beyond Good and Evil,"

"The Genealogy of Morals" and "The Twilight of the Idols," are closely

related in thought to "The Will to Power." This fact is borne out not

only by internal evidence, by the manner in which the books overlap,

and by the constant redistribution of titles which sometimes prove

the unity of the last phase of his thought, but also by the testimony

of those who had Nietzsche's confidence and could watch him at close

quarters.

Nietzsche intended to embody in the four books of "The Will to Power"

the entire sweep of his philosophical teachings. This work was to be

a summary, not only in statement but also in analysis, of his ethical

system. His preceding books had been replete in repetitions, and lacked

both organisation and sequence. His health was such that he could

work only sporadically and in short shifts, with the result that he

was constantly trying to crowd an enormous amount of material into a

short space. He was able to deal with but one point at a time, and, as

his working period was frequently too short to develop that point as

fully as he desired, we find him constantly going back over old ground,

altering his syllogisms, making addenda, interpolating analogies, and

in numerous other ways changing and clarifying what he had previously

written. "The Will to Power" was to be, then, a colossal organisation

of all his writings, with every step intact, and every conclusion in

its place. And throughout the four volumes emphasis was to be put on

his motivating doctrine, the will to power, an oppositional theory to

Darwin's theory of struggle for mere existence. But although we have

two large volumes of notes, these jottings lack in a large degree the

co-ordination which would have characterised them had Nietzsche been

able to carry out his plan.

The notes of these two books are the work of many years, and the

putting together of them for publication has been done without any

attempt to alter their original text. They are just as Nietzsche

left them--in some cases completed and closely argued paragraphs, in

others mere notations and memoranda, elliptic and unelaborated. It is

possible, however, to gain a very adequate idea of what was to be the

contents of this final work, due to the copiousness of the material

at hand. From the time of finishing "Thus Spake Zarathustra" to 1889,

Nietzsche was constantly making notes for his great work, and there

is no phase of his thought which is not touched upon in these two

remaining volumes. By following their pages closely, in the light

of his foregoing works, one gets a very definite impression of the

synthesis of his thoughts. Especially true is this of the second volume

of "The Will to Power," for it is here that his cardinal doctrine is

most strongly and consistently emphasised and its relationship to all

human relationships most concisely drawn. Because of this fact I have

chosen to consider the two volumes separately. The first volume is full

of material more or less familiar to those who have followed Nietzsche

in his earlier works. The notes are, in the majority of cases,

elaborations and explanations of doctrines contained in those books

which followed "Thus Spake Zarathustra." As such they are important.

The first volume is divided into two sections--"European Nihilism" and

"A Criticism of the Highest Values that Have Prevailed Hitherto." Two

subdivisions are found under section one--"Nihilism" and "Concerning

the History of European Nihilism." In this first subdivision Nietzsche

defines Nihilism and attempts to trace its origin. He states that it

is an outcome of the valuations and interpretations of existence

which have formerly prevailed, namely: the result of the doctrines of

Christianity. For our adherence to Christian morality, Nietzsche says,

we must pay dearly: by this adherence we are losing our equilibrium

and are on the verge of adopting opposite valuations--those consisting

of Nihilistic elements. He defines the Nihilistic movement as an

expression of decadence, and declares that this decadence is spreading

throughout all our modern institutions. Under his second subdivision,

he explains that modern gloominess is a result of the "slow advance

and rise of the middle and lower classes," and asserts that this

gloominess is accompanied by moral hypocrisy and the decadent virtues

of sympathy and pity. In this connection he denies that the nineteenth

century shows an improvement over the sixteenth. No better analysis

of the effects of Christian morality on modern man is to be found in

any of Nietzsche's writings than in this treatise of Nihilism; and a

close study of this analysis will greatly help one in grasping the full

significance of the doctrine of the will to power. Although the notes

in this book are the least satisfactory of all the portions of "The

Will to Power," being both tentative and incomplete, I have been able

to select enough definite statements from them to give an adequate idea

of both Nietzsche's theories and conclusions in regard to Nihilism.

In the second section of Volume I, "A Criticism of the Highest Values

That Have Prevailed Hitherto," the notes are fuller and more closely

organised. This is due to the fact that the ground covered by them

is in the main the same ground covered by "The Antichrist," "The

Genealogy of Morals" and "Beyond Good and Evil." In fact, there is

in these notes much repetition of passages to be found in the three

previous volumes. The first subdivision of this second section is

called "Criticism of Religion," and there is little material in it

which does not appear in "The Antichrist." Even in the manner of

expression there exists so strong a similarity that I am inclined to

think Nietzsche used these notes in composing his famous philippic

against Christianity. Consequently I have made but few quotations from

this division, choosing in each instance only such passages as do not

possess a direct parallel in his earlier work. We find here the same

inquiry into the origin of religions, the same analysis of Christian

ideals, the same history of Christian doctrines, and the same argument

against the dissemination of Christian faiths as are contained in "The

Antichrist." However, these present notes are sufficiently different

from this previous book to interest the thorough student, and there

are occasional speculations advanced which are not to be encountered

elsewhere in Nietzsche's writings. For the casual reader, however,

there is little of new interest in this subdivision.

The same criticism holds true to a large extent when we come to the

second subdivision of the second section "A Criticism of Morality." In

"The Genealogy of Morals" we have a discussion of practically all the

subjects considered in the present notes, such as the origin of moral

valuations, the basis of conscience, the influence of the herd, the

dominance of virtue, the slander of the so-called evil man, and the

significance of such words as "improving" and "elevating." However,

there is sufficient new material in these notes to warrant a reading,

for although, despite a few exceptions, there are no new issues posed,

certain points which were put forth only in a speculative and abridged

manner in earlier books, are here enlarged upon. This is especially

true in regard to the doctrine of rank. Nietzsche has been accused of

advocating only an individualistic morality. But the truth is that he

advanced two codes. He preached a morality for the herd, a definite

system which suited the needs of the serving classes. For the superior

individuals, on the other hand, he taught another code, one which

fitted and met the needs of the rulers. The herd morality has always

sought to create and maintain a single type of mediocre man. Nietzsche

preached the necessity of the superior, as well as the inferior, type

of man; and in his present notes he goes into this doctrine more fully

than heretofore. Furthermore, he makes clear his stand in regard to

the weak. On page 291 he states, "I have declared war against the

anæmic Christian ideal (together with what is closely related to it),

not because I want to annihilate it, but only to put an end to its

_tyranny_ and clear the way for other _ideals,_ for _more robust_

ideals." It has been stated, even in quarters where we have a right

to look for more intelligent criticism, that Nietzsche favoured the

complete elimination of the weak and incompetent. No such advocacy is

to be found in his teachings. To the contrary, as will be seen from the

above quotation, he preached only against the _dominance_ of the weak.

He resented their supremacy over the intelligent man. Their existence,

he maintained, was a most necessary thing. This belief is insisted upon

in many places, and one should bear the point in mind when reading the

criticisms of socialism to be found throughout the present volume.

Another new point to be found in these notes relates to the immoral

methods used by the disseminators of morals. From the passages in

which these new points are raised I have taken the quotations which

follow at the end of this chapter.

In the third and last subdivision of this second section, "Criticism

of Philosophy," we have an extension of Chapter I in "Beyond Good

and Evil," "Prejudices of Philosophers," and of the two chapters in

"The Twilight of the Idols"--"The Problem of Socrates" and "Reason

in Philosophy." The notes (excepting a few pages of general remarks)

occupy themselves with a criticism of Greek philosophy and with

an analysis of philosophical truths and errors. These notes touch

only indirectly on Nietzsche's doctrines, and may be looked upon as

explanations of his intellectual methods.

Despite their fragmentariness, the notes in this volume, as I have

said, permit one to gain an adequate idea of Nietzsche's purpose. In

making my excerpts from this book, I have chosen those passages which

will throw new light upon his philosophy rather than those statements

of conclusions which have been previously encountered.

What Nietzsche Taught · 第 63 / 77 题