Environmental Factors Influencing Growth

Zones of epidermis formed in some years are wider or narrower than the

zones bordering them (Pl. 22). Zones notably narrower or wider than

the average, formed in certain years, constituted distinct landmarks

in the growth-histories of nearly all specimens; for example, turtles

of all ages grew faster than average in 1954 and zones of epidermis

formed in this year were always wider than those formed in 1953 and

1955.

An index to the relative success of growth in each calendar year was

derived. Records of growth for all specimens in each age group were

averaged; the figure obtained was used to represent "normal" or

average growth rate in each year of life (Fig. 12). The over-all

averages for the various age groups were then compared with records of

growth attained by individuals of corresponding age in each calendar

year, growth in a particular year being expressed as a percentage of

the over-all average. The percentages of average growth for all ages

in each calendar year were then averaged; the mean expressed the

departure from normal rate of growth for all turtles growing in a

particular calendar year. For example, the over-all average increment

in plastral length in the fifth year of life was 12.1 per cent, the

increment in the sixth year was 10 per cent, and so on (Fig. 11). In

1953, turtles in their fifth and sixth years increased in plastral

length by 11.4 and 9.1 per cent, or grew at 94.2 and 91.0 per cent of

the normal rate, respectively. The percentages of normal growth rate

for these age groups averaged with percentages of the other age groups

in 1953 revealed that turtles grew at approximately 86 per cent of the

normal rate in 1953.

Growth rates were computed for the twelve-year period, 1943-1954,

because of the concentration of records in these years. Scattered

records also were available for many of the years from 1901-1942.

Records for individuals in the season of hatching and the first full

season of growth were not considered.

Direct correlation exists between growth rate and average monthly

precipitation in the season of growth (April to September) (Fig. 12).

In nine of eleven years, the curve for growth rate followed the trend

of the curve for precipitation; but because other climatic conditions

also influenced growth, the fluctuations in the two curves were not

proportional to one another.

Grasshoppers form an important element in the diet of box turtles.

Smith (1954) traced the relative abundance of grasshoppers over a

period of 100 years in Kansas, and this information is of significance

for comparison with data concerning growth of box turtles. In general,

the growth index was higher when favorable weather and large

populations of grasshoppers occurred in the same year.

In the following summary, the numbers (1 to 5) used to express the

relative abundance of grasshoppers are from Smith (_op. cit._). Maxima

and minima refer to the twelve-year period, 1943-1954. The growth

index for each year (shown as a graph in Fig. 12) appears in brackets

and indicates the percentage of normal growth attained by all turtles

in that year.

_Years Favorable for Growth_

=1954= [126.3]: Growth was better than average for turtles of all

ages. Grasshopper populations were highest (4+) since 1948.

Continuously warm weather, beginning in the last few days of March,

permitted emergence in the first week of April; thereafter conditions

were more or less continuously favorable for activity until late

October. Although there was less than an inch of precipitation in

September, precipitation in August and October was approximately twice

normal and more or less evenly distributed. Warm weather in early

November permitted an additional two weeks of activity.

=1945= [125.5]: This was the second most favorable year for growth and

the second wettest year. Records of growth are all from young turtles

(one to four years old), all of which grew more than average. Daily

maximum temperatures higher than 60 degrees Fahrenheit on 18 of the

last 19 days of March, combined with twice the normal amount of

precipitation in the same period, stimulated early emergence. August

and October were both dry (each with less than one inch of

precipitation) but diurnal temperatures remained warm through the

first week in November and probably prolonged activity of box turtles

at least until then. Grasshoppers were more abundant (3.7) than

normal.

_Years Unfavorable for Growth_

=1944= [83.1]: This was the poorest growing year for the period

considered. The lack of a continuously warm, wet period in early

spring probably delayed emergence until the last week in April.

Temperatures remained warm enough for activity until early November,

but dry weather in September and October probably curtailed activity

for inducing long periods of quiescence; most of the precipitation

that occurred in the latter two months fell in a one-week period

beginning in the last few days of September. Grasshopper populations

were higher (4.0) than normal.

=1953= [85.6]: This was the second poorest growing year and the driest

year in the period considered. Intermittently cold weather in spring

delayed emergence until the last week in April when nearly an inch of

rain fell. Temperatures were higher than normal from June to October.

The period from September to the end of October was dry and the small

amount of precipitation that occurred was concentrated chiefly at the

beginning and end of that period. Temperatures in late October and

early November were lower than normal. Grasshopper populations were

low (2.2).

=1952= [88.3]: Environmental conditions were poor for growth and much

like the conditions described for 1953. In both years growth was much

less than normal in turtles of all ages except for one group (adults

that were 10 and 11 years old in 1952 and 1953, respectively) that was

slightly below normal in 1952 and slightly above normal in 1953.

The small number of records for 1955 were not considered in Figure

12. Warm weather in the last half of March lengthened the growing

season, and environmental conditions, as in 1954, were more or less

favorable throughout the rest of the summer; 1955 probably ranks with

1954 as an exceptionally good year for growth of box turtles.

Although the number of records available for turtles hatched in the

period from 1950 to 1954 is small, a few records are available for all

these years except 1951. In general, small samples of turtles hatched

in these years reflect only the difficulty of collecting hatchlings

and juveniles. In 1951, conditions for incubation and hatching were

poor and the lack of records for that year actually represents a high

rate of prenatal and postnatal mortality. Rainfall in the nesting

season was two to three times normal and temperatures were below

normal. Flooding occurred in low areas of Douglas County and many eggs

may have been destroyed when nests were inundated. Cold weather

probably increased the time of incubation for surviving eggs so that

only a few turtles could hatch before winter. Flooding and cold, wet

weather in the season of growth and reproduction, affecting primarily

eggs and hatchlings, may act as checks on populations of _T. ornata_

in certain years.

[Illustration: FIG. 12. The relation of growth rate in

_Terrapene o. ornata_ (solid line) to precipitation (dotted

line) in eastern Kansas. "Normal" rate of growth was determined

by averaging records of increase in length of plastron for

turtles in each age group. The growth index is expressed as a

percentage of normal growth and is the mean departure from

normal of all age groups in each calendar year. Precipitation

is for the period, April to September (inclusive), at Lawrence,

Douglas Co., Kansas. The means for precipitation (4.3) and

growth index (100) are indicated by horizontal lines at the

right of the graph.]

The environmental factors governing activity of terrestrial turtles

seem to differ at least in respect to threshold, from the factors

influencing the activity of aquatic turtles. A single month that was

drier or cooler than normal probably would not noticeably affect

growth and activity of aquatic emyids in northeast Kansas, but might

greatly curtail growth of box turtles.

Cagle (1948:202) found that growth of slider turtles (_Pseudemys

scripta_) in Illinois paralleled the growth of bass and bluegills in

the same lake; in the two years in which the fish grew rapidly, the

turtles did also, owing, he thought to "lessened total population

pressure" and "reduced competition for food." Growth of five-lined

skinks (_Eumeces fasciatus_) on the Natural History Reservation

paralleled growth of box turtles, probably because at least some of

the same environmental factors influence the growth of both species.

Calculations of departure from normal growth in _E. fasciatus_, made

by me from Fitch's graph (1954:84, Fig. 13), show that relative

success of growth in the period he considered can be ranked by year,

in descending order, as: 1951, 1949, 1948, 1950, 1952. This

corresponds closely to the sequence, 1951, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1952, for

_T. ornata_.

Natural History of the Ornate Box Turtle, Terrapene ornata ornata Agassiz · 第 54 / 88 题