Quarrels and combats between wild animals in a state of nature are

almost invariably due to one of two causes--attack and defense in

a struggle for prey, or the jealousy of males during the mating

season. With rare exceptions, battles of the former class occur

between animals of different Orders,--teeth and claws against

horns and hoofs, for instance; and it is a fight to the death.

Hunger forces the aggressor to attack something, and the intended

victim fights because it is attacked. The question of good or ill

temper does not enter in. On both sides it is a case of "must,"

and neither party has any option. Such combats are tests of

agility, strength, and staying powers, and, in a few cases, of

thickness of bone and hide.

How Orang-Utans Fight. Of the comparatively few animals which do

draw blood of their own kind through ill temper or jealousy, I

have never encountered any more given to internecine strife than

orang-utans. Their fighting methods, and their love of fighting,

are highly suggestive of the temper and actions of the human

tough. They fight by biting, and usually it is the fingers and

toes that suffer. Of twenty-seven orang-utans I shot in Borneo,

and twelve more that were shot for me by native hunters, five were

fighters, and had had one or more fingers or toes bitten off in

battle. Those specimens were taken in the days when the museums of

America were one and all destitute of anthropoid apes.

A gorilla, chimpanzee, or orang-utan, being heavy of body, short

of neck, and by no means nimble footed, cannot spring upon an

adversary, choose a vulnerable spot, and bite to kill; but what it

lacks in agility it makes up in length and strength of arm and

hand. It seizes its antagonist's hand, carries it to its own

mouth, and bites at the fingers. Usually, the bitten finger is

severed as evenly as by a surgeon's amputation, and heals quite as

successfully.

I never saw two big orang-utans fighting, but I have had several

captive ones seize my arm and try to bring my fingers within

biting distance. The canine teeth of a full grown male orang,

standing four feet four inches in height, and weighing a hundred

and fifty pounds or more, are just as large and dangerous as the

teeth of a bear of the same size, and the powerful incisors have

one quality which the teeth of a bear do not possess. A bear

pierces or tears an antagonist with his canines, but very rarely

bites off anything. An orang-utan bites off a finger as evenly as

a boy nips off the end of a stick of candy.

When orang-utans fight, they also attack each other's faces, and

often their broad and expansive lips suffer severely. My eleventh

orang bore the scars of many a fierce duel in the tree-tops. A

piece had been bitten out of the middle of both his lips, leaving

in each a large, ragged notch. Both his middle fingers had been

taken off at the second joint, and his feet had lost the third

right toe, the fourth left toe, and the end of one hallux. His

back, also, had sustained a severe injury, which had retarded his

growth. This animal we called "The Desperado."

Orang No. 34 had lost the entire edge of his upper lip. It had

been bitten across diagonally, but adhered at one corner, and

healed without sloughing off, so that during the last years of his

life a piece of lip two inches long hung dangling at the corner of

his mouth. He had also suffered the loss of an entire finger. No.

36 had lost a good sized piece out of his upper lip, and the first

toe had been bitten off his left foot.

All these combats must have taken place in the tree-tops, for an

adult orang-utan has never been known to descend to the earth

except for water. In some manner it has become a prevalent

belief that in their native jungles all three of the great apes--

gorilla, orang, and chimpanzee--are dangerous to human beings, and

often attack them with clubs. Nothing could be farther from the

truth. According to the natives of West Africa, a gorilla or

chimpanzee fights a hunter by biting his face and fingers, just as

an orang-utan does. I believe that no sane orang ever voluntarily

left the safety of a tree top to fight at a serious disadvantage

on the ground; and I am sure an orang never struck a blow with a

club, unless carefully taught to do so.

WILD ANIMALS ARE NOT QUARRELSOME. As a species, man appears to be

the most quarrelsome animal on the earth; and the same quality is

strongly reflected in his most impressionable servant and

companion, the domestic dog. Nearly all species of wild animals

have learned the two foundation facts of the philosophy of life--

that peace is better than war, and that if one must fight, it is

better to fight outside one's own species. To this rule, however,

wolves are a notable exception; for wherever wolves are abundant a

wounded wolf is a subject for attack, and usually it is killed and

eaten by the other members of the pack.

I have observed the daily habits of many kinds of wild animals in

their wild haunts, but in the field I never yet have seen either a

fight between animals of the same species, or between two of

different species. This may seem a very humiliating admission for

a hunter to make, but it happens to be true. In the matter of

finding big snakes, having exciting adventures, and witnessing

combats between wild animals, there are some men who never are in

luck.

Now there was the "Old Shekarry,"--whose elephants, tigers, bison,

bears, and sambar always were so much larger than mine. In his

book, "Sport in Many Lands," he describes an affair of honor

between a tiger and a bull bison, which was a truly ideal combat.

The champions met by appointment,--by the light of the moon, in

order to be safe from interference by the jungle police,--and they

fought round after round, in the most orthodox prize ring style,

under the Queensberry rules. So fairly did they fight that neither

claimed a foul, and at the finish the two combatants retired to

their respective corners and died simultaneously, "to the musical

twitter of the night bird."

Another writer has given a vivid description of a battle to the

death between a wild bull and a grizzly bear; and we have read of

several awful combats between black bears and alligators, in

Florida; but some of us have yet to find either a black bear or an

alligator that will stop to fight when he has an option on a line

of retreat. When he has lived long,--say to the length of twelve

feet,--the alligator is a hideous and terrorizing beast; but, for

all that, he knows a thing or two; and a full grown, healthy black

bear of active habit is about the last creature on earth that a

'gator would care to meddle with. Pigs and calves, fawns, stray

dogs, ducks and mud hens are antagonists more to his liking.

The Fighting Tactics of Bears. In captivity, bears quarrel and

scold one another freely, at feeding time, but seldom draw blood.

I have questioned many old hunters, and read many books by bear

hunters, but Ira Dodge, of Wyoming, is the only man I know who has

witnessed a real fight between wild bears. He once saw a battle

between a cinnamon and a grizzly over the carcass of an elk.

In attacking, a bear does three things, and usually in the same

order. First, he delivers a sweeping sidewise blow on the head of

his antagonist; then he seizes him by the cheek, with the

intention of shifting to the throat as quickly as it is safe to do

so. His third move consists in throwing his weight upon his foe

and bearing him to the earth, where he will have a better chance

at his throat. If the fighters are fairly matched, the struggle is

head to head and mouth to mouth. After the first onset, the paws

do little or no damage, and the attacks of the teeth rarely go as

far down as the shoulders. Often the assailant will seize his

opponent's cheek and hold on so firmly that for a full minute the

other can do nothing; but this means little.

In combats between bears, the one that is getting mauled, or that

feels outclassed, will throw himself upon the ground, flat upon

his back, and proceed to fight with all four sets of claws in

addition to his teeth. This attitude is purely defensive, and

often is maintained until an opportunity occurs to attack with

good advantage, or to escape. It is very difficult for a standing

bear to make a serious impression upon an antagonist who lies upon

his back, clawing vigorously with all four feet at the head of his

assailant.

Tiger Versus Grizzly Bear. Often is the question asked, "If a

grizzly bear and a tiger should fight, which would whip the

other?" One can answer only with opinions and deductions, not by

reference to the records of the ring; for it seems that the

terrors of the occident and the orient have never yet been matched

in a fight to a finish.

One of the heaviest tigers ever weighed, prior to 1878, scaled

four hundred and ninety five pounds, and was as free from surplus

flesh and fat as a prizefighter in the ring. He stood three feet

seven inches at the shoulder, measured thirty-six inches around

the jaws, and twenty inches around the forearm. Very few lions

have ever exceeded his weight or dimensions. So far as I know, a

wild grizzly bear of the largest size has never been scaled, but

it is not at all certain that any California grizzly has weighed

more than twelve hundred pounds. The silvertip of the Rocky

Mountain region is a totally different animal, being smaller, as

well as different in color.

In a match between a grizzly and a tiger of equal weights, the

activity of the latter, combined with the greater spread of his

jaws and length of his canine teeth, would insure him the victory.

The superior attack of the tiger would give him an advantage which

it would probably be impossible to overcome. The blow of a

tiger's paw is as powerful as that of a grizzly of the same size,

though I doubt if it is any quicker in delivery. The quickness

with which a seemingly clumsy bear can deliver a smashing blow is

astonishing. Moreover, nature has given the grizzly a coat of fur

which as a protection in fighting is almost equal to chain mail.

Its length, combined with its density, makes it difficult for

teeth or claws to cut through it, and in a struggle with a tiger,

protective fur is only a fair compensation for a serious lack of

leaping power in the hinder limbs. Though the tiger would win at

equal weights, it is extremely probable that an adult California

grizzly would vanquish a tiger of the largest size, for his

greater bulk would far outweigh the latter's agility.

The Great Cats as Fighters. Tigers, when well matched, fight head

to head and mouth to mouth, as do nearly all other carnivora, and

at the same time they strike with their front paws. One of the

finest spectacles I ever witnessed was a pitched battle between

two splendid tigers, in a cage which afforded them ample room.

With loud, roaring coughs, they sprang together, ears laid tight

to their heads, eyes closed until only sparks of green and yellow

fire flashed through four narrow slits, and their upper lips

snarling high up to clear the glittering fangs beneath. Coughing,

snarling, and often roaring furiously, each sprang for the

other's throat, but jaw met jaw until their teeth almost cracked

together. They rose fully erect on their hind legs, with their

heads seven feet high, stood there, and smashed away with their

paws, while tufts of hair flew through the air, and the cage

seemed full of sparks. Neither gave the other a chance to get the

throat hold, nor indeed to do aught else than ward off calamity;

and each face was a picture of fury.

This startling combat lasted a surprisingly long time, without

noticeable advantage to either side. Finally the tigers backed

away from each other, and when at a safe distance apart dropped

their front feet to the floor, growling savagely and licking their

lips wherever a claw had drawn blood.

Of all the wild animals that are preyed upon by lions, tigers,

leopards, jaguars, and pumas, only half a dozen species do

anything more than struggle to escape. The gaur and the wild

buffalo of India are sufficiently vindictive in dealing with a

human hunter whose aim is not straight, but both fly before the

tiger, and count themselves lucky when they can escape with

nothing worse to show than a collection of long slits on their

sides and hind quarters made by his knife-like claws. They do not

care to return to do battle for the sake of revenge, and seek to

put the widest possible stretch of jungle between themselves and

their dreaded enemy.

The same is true of the African buffalo and the lion. As to the

antelopes of Africa and the deer of India, what can they do but

make a desperate effort to escape, and fly like the wind whenever

they succeed? Of course many of these defenseless animals make a

gallant struggle for their lives, and not a few succeed in

throwing off their assailants and escaping. Even domestic cattle

sometimes return to the hill country villages of southern India

bearing claw marks on their sides--usually the work of young

tigers, or of rheumatic old ones.

Here is a deer and puma story. In the picturesque bad-lands of

Hell Creek, Montana, I saw my comrade, Laton A. Huffman, kill a

large mule deer buck that three months previously had been

attacked by a puma. From above it, the great cat had leaped upon

the back of the deer, and laid hold with teeth and claws. In its

struggle for life the buck either leaped or fell off the edge of a

perpendicular "cut bank," and landed upon its back, with the puma

underneath. Evidently the puma was so seriously injured that it

could not continue the struggle; but it surely left its ear-marks.

One ear of the buck was fearfully torn. There was a big wound on

the top of the neck, where the puma jaws had lacerated the skin

and flesh; and both hind legs had been badly clawed by the

assailant's hind feet. The main beam of the right antler had been,

broken off half-way up, while the antlers were still in the

velvet, which enabled us to fix the probable date of the

encounter.

In the great Wynaad forest I once got lost, and in toiling through

a five acre patch of grass higher than my head, and so dense that

it was not negotiable except by following the game trails, my

simple old Kuramber and I came suddenly upon the scene of a great

struggle. In the center of a space about twenty feet in diameter,

on which the tall grass had been trampled flat, lay the remains of

a sambar stag which had very recently been killed and eaten by a

tiger. The neck had not been dislocated, and the sambar had fought

long and hard. Evidently the tiger had lain in wait on the runway,

and had failed to subdue the sambar by his first fierce onslaught.

Now an angry stag with good antlers is no mean antagonist, and it

is strange if the tiger in the case went through that struggle

without a puncture in his tawny skin.

In South Africa, Vaughan Kirby once found the dead bodies of a

"patriarchal bull" sable antelope and a lion, "which had evidently

been a fine specimen," lying close together, where the two

animals had fallen after a great struggle. The sable antelope must

have killed its antagonist by a lucky backward thrust of its long,

curved horns as the lion fastened upon its back to pull it down.

Mr. Kirby's dogs once disturbed a sanguinary struggle between a

leopard and a wild boar, or "bush pig," which had well-nigh

reached a finish. The old boar, when bayed by the dogs, was found

to be most terribly mauled. Its tough skin hung literally in

shreds from its neck and shoulders, presenting ghastly open

wounds. The entrails protruded from a deep claw gash in the side,

and the head was a mass of blood and dirt. "On searching around,"

says Mr. Kirby, "we found unmistakable evidence of a life and

death struggle. The ground was covered with gouts of blood and

yellow hair, to some of which the skin (of the leopard) was still

attached. Blood was splashed plentifully on the tree stems and the

low brushwood, which for a space of a dozen yards around was

trampled flat." The leopard had fled upon the approach of the

dogs, leaving a trail of blood, which, though followed quickly,

was finally lost in bad ground. It is no wonder that from the

above and many other evidences equally good, Mr. Kirby considers

the bush pig a remarkably courageous animal. He says that it was

"never yet known to show the white feather," and declares that "a

pig is never defeated until he is dead."

The Combats of Male Deer. The sable antelope is one of the few

exceptions to the well-nigh universal rule against fighting

between wild animals of the same species. Of this species, Mr.

Kirby says: "Sable antelope bulls fight most fiercely amongst

themselves, and though I have never actually witnessed an

encounter between them, I have often seen the results of such,

evidenced by great gaping wounds that could have been made by

nothing else than the horns of an opponent. I once killed a large

bull with a piece of another's horn tip, fully three inches long,

buried in its neck. In 1889 I shot an old bull on the Swinya with

a terrible wound in its off shoulder, caused by a horn thrust."

During the jealous flashes of the mating season, the males of

several species of deer fight savagely. After a long period of

inaction while the new antlers are developing--from April to

September--the beginning of October finds the male deer, elk, or

moose of North America with a new suit of hair, new horns, a

swollen neck, and all his usual assertiveness. The crisp autumn

air promotes a disposition to fight something, precisely as it

inspires a sportsman to "kill something." During October and

November, particularly, it is well for an unarmed man to give

every antlered deer a wide berth.

At this period, fights between the males of herds of mule deer,

white-tailed deer and elk are of frequent occurrence, but in a

wild state they rarely end in bloodshed or death, save from locked

antlers. Many times, however, two bucks will come together, and

playfully push each other about without being angry. Many pairs of

bucks have been found with their antlers fast locked in death--and

I never see a death lock without a feeling of grim satisfaction

that neither of the quarrelsome brutes had had an opportunity to

attack some defenseless man, and spear him to death.

The antlers of the common white-tailed deer seem peculiarly

liable to become interlocked so tightly that it is well-nigh

impossible to separate them. And whenever this happens, the doom

of both deer is sealed. Unless found speedily and killed, they

must die of starvation. While it is quite true that two deer

playing with their antlers may become locked fast, it is safe to

say that the great majority meet their fate by charging each other

with force sufficient to spring the beams of their antlers, and

make the lock so perfect that no force they can exert will release

it. A deer cannot pull back with the same power it exerts in

plunging forward.

All members of the deer family that I know follow the same natural

law in regard to supremacy. Indeed, this is true of nearly all

animals. Leadership is not always maintained by the largest and

strongest member of a herd, but very often by the most pugnacious.

Sometimes a herd of elk is completely tyrannized by an old doe,

who makes the young bucks fly from her in terror, when one prod of

their sharp antlers would quickly send her to the rear.

When bucks in a state of freedom fight for supremacy, the weaker

does not stay to be overthrown and speared to death by the victor.

As soon as he feels that he is mastered he releases his antlers at

the first opportunity, flings himself to one side, and either

remains in the herd as an acknowledged subject of the victor, or

else seeks fresh fields and pastures new.

Battles in Zoological Parks. In captivity, where escape is

impossible, it is no uncommon thing for elk to kill each other.

In fact, with several adult males in a small enclosure, tragedies

may always be expected in the autumn and early winter. The process

is very simple. So long as the two elk can stand up and fight head

to head, there are no casualties; but when one wearies and weakens

before the other, its guard is broken. Then one strong thrust in

its side or shoulder sends it to the earth, badly wounded; and

before it can rise, it is generally stabbed to death with horn

thrusts into its lungs and liver. But, as I said before, I have

never known of a fatal duel between elk outside of a zoological

garden or park.

One of the most novel and interesting fights that has yet taken

place in the New York Zoological Park was a pitched battle between

two cow elk--May Queen and the Dowager. A bunch of black fungus

suddenly appeared on the trunk of a tree, about twelve feet from

the ground. My attention was first called to this by seeing May

Queen, a fine young cow, standing erect on her hind legs in order

to reach the tempting morsel with her mouth. A little later the

Dowager, the oldest and largest cow elk in the herd, met her under

the tree, whereupon the two made wry faces at each other, and

champed their teeth together threateningly. Suddenly both cows

rose on their hind legs, struck out viciously with their sharp

pointed front hoofs, and, after a lively sparring bout, they

actually clinched. The young cow got both front legs of the old

cow between her own, where they were held practically helpless,

and then with her own front hoofs she fiercely rained blows upon

the ribs of her assailant. The Dowager backed away and fled,

completely vanquished, with May Queen close upon her heels; and

thus was the tyrannical rule of the senior cow overthrown forever.

During the breeding season, our wild buffaloes of the great

vanished herds were much given to fighting, and always through

jealousy. The bulls bellowed until they could be heard for miles,

tore up earth and threw it into the air, rolled their eyes, and

often rushed together in a terrifying manner; but beyond butting

their heads, pushing and straining until the weaker turned and

ran, nothing came of it all. I have yet to find a man who ever saw

a wild buffalo that had been wounded to the shedding of blood by

another wild buffalo. It is probable that no other species ever

fought so fiercely and did so little damage as the American bison.

Elephants, Wolves, and Others. In ordinary life the Indian

elephant is one of the most even-tempered of all animals. I have

spent hours in watching wild herds in southern India, sometimes

finding the huge beasts all around me, and in dangerously close

proximity. Several times I could have touched a wild elephant with

a carriage whip, had I possessed one. So far from fighting, I

never saw an elephant threaten or even annoy another.

Elephants, being the most intelligent of all animals in the matter

of training, have been educated to fight in the arena, usually by

pushing each other head to head. A fighting tusker can lord it

over almost any number of tuskless elephants, because he can

pierce their vitals, and they cannot pierce his. A female fights

by hitting with her head, striking her antagonist amidships, if

possible. Once when the late G. P. Sanderson was in a keddah,

noosing wild elephants, and was assulted [sic] by a vicious

tusker, his life was saved by a tame female elephant, whose boy

driver caused her to attack the tusker with her head, and nearly

bowl him over by the force of her blows upon his ribs.

In captivity, wolves are the meanest brutes on earth, and in a

wild state they are no better. As a rule, the stronger ones are

ever ready to kill the weaker ones, and eat them, too. One night,

our male Russian wolf killed his mate, and ate nearly half of her

before morning. A fox or a wolf cub which thrusts one of its legs

between the partition bars and into a wolf's den almost invariably

gets it bitten off as close to the body as the biter can go. In

the arctic regions, north of the Great Slave Lake, "Buffalo" Jones

and George Rea fought wolves incessantly for several days, and

every wolf they wounded was immediately killed and devoured by its

pack mates.

In captivity, a large proportion of mammals fight, more or less;

and the closer the confinement, the greater their nervousness and

irritability, and the more fighting. Monkeys fight freely and

frequently. Serpents, lizards, and alligators rarely do, although

large alligators are prone to bite off the tails or legs of their

small companions, or even to devour them whole. Storks, trumpeter

swans, darters, jays, and some herons are so quarrelsome and

dangerous that they must be kept well separated from other

species, to prevent mutilation and murder. In 1900, when a pair of

trumpeter swans were put upon a lake in Prospect Park, Brooklyn,

with three brown pelicans for associates, they promptly assailed

the pelicans, dug holes in their backs, and killed all three. The

common red squirrel is a persistent fighter of the gray species,

and, although inferior in size, nearly always wins.

A Fight Between a Whale and a Swordfish. One of the strangest wild

animal combats on record was thus described in the Proceedings of

the Zoological Society of London, for 1909.

The Minds and Manners of Wild Animals: A Book of Personal Observations · 第 21 / 24 段