While many wonderful stories are related of the elephant's

sagacity and independent powers of reasoning, it must be admitted

that a greater number of more wonderful anecdotes are told on

equally good authority of dogs. But the circumstances in the case

are wholly to the advantage of the universal dog, and against the

rarely seen elephant. While the former roams at will through his

master's premises, through town and country, mingling freely with

all kinds of men and domestic animals, with unlimited time to lay

plans and execute them, the elephant in captivity is chained to a

stake, with no liberty of action whatever aside from begging with

his trunk, eating and drinking. His only amusement is in swaying

his body, swinging one foot, switching his tail, and (in a

zoological park) looking for something that he can open or

destroy. Such a ponderous beast cannot be allowed to roam at large

among human beings, and the working elephant never leaves his

stake and chain except under the guidance of his mahout. There is

no means of estimating the wonderful powers of reasoning that

captive elephants might develop if they could only enjoy the

freedom accorded to all dogs except the blood-hound, bull-dog and

a few others.

In the jungles of India the writer frequently has seen wild

elephants reconnoitre dangerous ground by means of a scout or spy;

communicate intelligence by signs; retreat in orderly silence from

a lurking danger, and systematically march, in single file, like

the jungle tribes of men.

Once having approached to within fifty yards of the stragglers of

a herd of about thirty wild elephants, which was scattered over

about four acres of very open forest and quietly feeding, two

individuals of the herd on the side nearest us suddenly suspected

danger. One of them elevated his trunk, with the tip bent forward,

and smelled the air from various points of the compass. A moment

later an old elephant left the herd and started straight for our

ambush, scenting the air with upraised trunk as he slowly and

noiselessly advanced. We instantly retreated, unobserved and

unheard. The elephant advanced until he reached the identical spot

where we had a moment before been concealed. He paused, and stood

motionless as a statue for about two minutes, then wheeled about

and quickly but noiselessly rejoined the herd. In less than half

a minute the whole herd was in motion, heading directly away from

us, and moving very rapidly, but _without the slightest

noise_. The huge animals simply vanished like shadows into the

leafy depths of the forest. Before proceeding a quarter of a mile,

the entire herd formed in single file and continued strictly in

that order for several miles. Like the human dwellers in the

jungle, the elephants know that the easiest and most expeditious

way for a large body of animals to traverse a tangled forest is

for the leader to pick the way, while all the others follow in his

footsteps.

In strong contrast with the stealthy and noiseless manner in which

elephants steal away from a lurking danger, or an ambush

discovered, from an open attack accompanied with the noise of

fire-arms they rush away at headlong speed, quite regardless of

the noise they make. On one occasion a herd which I was designing

to attack, and had approached to within forty yards, as its

members were feeding in some thick bushes, discovered my presence

and retreated so silently that they had been gone five minutes

before I discovered what their sudden quietude really meant. In

this instance, as in several others, the still alarm was

communicated by silent signals, or sign-language.

At the Zoological Park we reared an African pygmy elephant

(_Elephas pumilio_). When his slender little tusks grew to

eighteen inches in length he made some interesting uses of them.

Once when the keepers wished to lead him upon our large platform

scales, the trembling of the platform frightened him. He conceived

the idea that it was unsafe, and therefore that he must keep off.

He backed away, halted, and refused to leave solid ground. The men

pushed him. He backed, and trumpeted a shrill protest. The men

pushed harder, and forced him forward. Trumpeting his wild alarm

and his protest against what he regarded as murder, he fell upon

his knees and drove his tusks into the earth, quite up to his

mouth, to anchor himself firmly to the solid ground. It was

pathetic, but also amusing. When Congo finally was pushed upon the

scales and weighed, he left the trembling instrument of torture

with an air of disgust and disapproval that was quite as eloquent

as words. On several occasions when taken out for exercise in the

park, he endeavored to hinder the return to quarters by anchoring

himself to Mother Earth.

Congo once startled us by his knowledge of the usefulness of

doors. For a time he was kept in a compartment that had an outside

door running sidewise on a trolley track, and controlled by two

hanging chains, one to close it and one to open it. Each chain had

on its end a stout iron ring for a handle. One chilly morning when

I went to see Congo, I asked his keeper to open his door, so that

he could go out.

The keeper did so, by pulling the right hand chain. The moment the

draft of chilly outer air struck Congo, who stood in the centre of

his stall facing me, he impatiently wheeled about, walked up to

the left hand chain, grabbed it with his trunk, slipped the ring

over one of his tusks, then inclined his head downward and with an

irritated tug pulled the door shut with a spiteful slam. "Open

it again," I said to the keeper.

He did so, and in the same way, but with a visible increase in

irritation, Congo closed it in the same manner as before. Again

the keeper opened the door, and this time, with a real exhibition

of temper Congo again thrust the ring over his tusk, and brought

the door shut with a resounding bang. It was his regular habit to

close that door, or to open it, when he felt like more air or less

air; and who is there who will say that the act was due to

"instinct" in a jungle-bred animal, or anything else than original

thought. The ring on his tusk was his own invention, as a means to

a desired end.

Every elephant that we ever have had has become, through his own

initiative and experimenting, an expert in unfastening the latches

of doors and gates, and in untying chains and ropes. Gunda always

knew enough to attack the padlocks on his leg chains, and break

them if possible. No ordinary clevis would hold him. When the pin

was threaded at one end and screwed into its place, Gunda would

work at it, hour by hour, until he would start it to unscrewing,

and then his trunk-tip would do the rest. The only clevis that he

could not open was one in which a stout cotter pin was passed

through the end of the clevis-pin and strongly bent.

Through reasons emanating in his own savage brain, Gunda took

strong dislikes to several of our park people. He hated Dick

Richards,--the keeper of Alice. He hated a certain messenger boy,

a certain laborer, a painter and Mr. Ditmars. Toward me he was

tolerant, and never rushed at me to kill me, as he always did to

his pet aversions. He stood in open fear of his own keeper, Walter

Thuman, until he had studied out a plan to catch him off his guard

and "get him." Then he launched his long-contemplated attack, and

Thuman was almost killed.

Our present (1921) male African elephant, Kartoum, is not so

hostile toward people, but his insatiable desire is to break and

to smash all of his environment that can be bent or broken. His

ingenuity in finding ways to damage doors and gates, and to bend

or to break steel beams, is amazing. His greatest feat consisted

in breaking squarely in two, by pushing with his head, a 90-pound

steel railroad iron used as the top bar of his fence. He knows the

mechanism of the latch of the ponderous steel door between his two

box stalls, and nothing but a small pin that only human fingers

can manipulate suffices to thwart his efforts to control the

latch.

Kartoum has gone over every inch of surface of his two apartments,

his doors, gates and fences, to find something that he can break

or damage. The steel linings of his apartment walls, originally

five feet high, we have been compelled to extend upward to a

height of nine feet, to save the brick walls from being battered

and disfigured. He has searched his steel fences throughout, in

order to find their weakest points, and concentrate his attacks

upon them. If the sharp-pointed iron spikes three inches long that

are set all over his doors are perfectly solid, he respects them,

but if one is the least bit loose in its socket, he works at it

until he finally breaks it off.

I invite any Doubting Thomas who thinks that Kartoum does not

"think" and "reason" to try his own thinking and reasoning at

inventing for Kartoum's door a latch that a keeper can easily and

surely open and close at a distance of ten feet, and that will be

Kartoum-proof. As for ourselves, three or four seemingly

intelligent officers and keepers, and a capable foreman of

construction, have all they can do to keep ahead of that one

elephant, so great is his ingenuity in thwarting our ways and

means to restrain him.

In about two days of effort our elephant keepers taught Gunda to

receive a coin from the hand of a visitor, or pick it off the

floor, lift the lid of a high-placed cash-box, drop the coin into

it and ring a bell. This very amusing industry was kept up for

several years, but finally it became so popular that it had to be

discontinued.

Keeper Dick Richards easily taught Alice to blow a mouth organ,

and to ring a telephone, to take the receiver off its hook and

hold it to her ear and listen. For years Alice has rendered, every

summer, valuable services of a serious nature in carrying children

and other visitors around her yard, and only once or twice has she

shown a contrary or obstinate spirit.

Tame elephants never tread on the feet of their attendants or

knock them down by accident; or, at least, no instances of the

kind have come to my knowledge. The elephant's feet are large, his

range of vision is circumscribed, and his extreme and wholly

voluntary solicitude for the safety of his human attendants can

not be due to anything else than independent reasoning. The most

intelligent dog is apt to greet his master by planting a pair of

dirty paws against his coat or trousers. The most sensible

carriage-horse is liable to step on his master's foot or crowd him

against a wall in a moment of excitement; but even inside the

keddah, with wild elephants all about, and a captive elephant

hemmed in by three or four tame animals, the noosers safely work

under the bodies and between the feet of the tame elephant until

the feet of the captive are tied.

All who have witnessed the tying of captives in a keddah wherein a

whole wild herd has been entrapped, testify to the uncanny human-

like quality of the intelligence displayed by the tame elephants

who assist in tying, leading out and subjugating the wild

captives. They enter into the business with both spirit and

understanding, and as occasion requires will deceitfully cajole or

vigorously punish a troublesome captive. Sir Emerson Tennent

asserts that the tame elephants display the most perfect

conception of every movement, both of the object to be attained

and the means to accomplish it.

Memory in the Elephant. So far as memory may be regarded as an

index of an animal's mental capacity, the weight of evidence is

most convincingly creditable to the elephant. As a test of memory

in an animal, we hold that a trained performance surpasses all

others. During the past forty years millions of people have

witnessed in either Barnum's or Ringling Brothers' shows, or in

the two combined, an imitation military drill performed by from

twelve to twenty elephants which in animals of any other species

would be considered a remarkable performance. The following were

the commands given by one trainer, understood and remembered by

each elephant, and executed without any visible hesitation or

mistake. These we will call the

Accomplishments of Performing Elephants.

1. Fall in line.

2. Roll-call. (As each elephant's name is called, he takes his

place in the ranks).

3. Present arms. (The trunk is uplifted, with its tip curved

forward and held in that position for a short time.)

4. Forward, march.

5. File left, march.

6. Right about face, march.

7. Left about face, march.

8. Right by twos, march.

9. Double quick, march.

10. Single file, march.

11. File right.

12. Halt.

13. Ground arms. (All lie down, and lie motionless.)

14. Attention (All arise.)

15. Shoulder arms. (All stand up on their hind-legs.)

In all, fifteen commands were obeyed by the whole company of

elephants.

It being impossible, or at least impracticable, to supply so large

a number of animals with furniture and stage properties for a

further universal performance, certain individuals were supplied

with the proper articles when necessary for a continuation of the

performance, as follows:

16. Ringing bells.

17. Climbing up a step-ladder.

18. Going lame in a fore leg.

19. Going lame in a hind leg.

20. Stepping up on a tub turned bottom up.

[Illustration with

caption: TAME ELEPHANTS ASSISTING IN TYING A WILD CAPTIVE The

captive elephant is marked "C." The tame elephants have been

quietly massed around him to keep him still and to give the

noosers a chance to work at his legs from under the bodies of the

tame elephants. The black figures on the tame elephants are their

mahouts, wrapped in blankets and lying down. (From A. G. R.

Theobald, Mysore)]

21. Standing on a tub on right legs only.

22. The same, on opposite legs.

23. The same, on the fore legs only.

24. The same, on the hind legs only.

25. Using a fan.

26. Turning a hand-organ.

27. Using a handkerchief to wipe the eyes.

28. Sitting in a chair.

29. Kneeling, with the fore legs.

30. Kneeling with the hind legs.

31. Walking astride a man lying lengthwise.

32. Stepping over a man lying down.

33. Forming a pyramid of elephants, by using tubs of various

sizes.

While it is true that not all of the acts in the latter part of

this performance were performed by each one of the elephants who

went through the military drill, there is no reason to doubt the

entire ability of each individual to be trained to obey the whole

thirty-three commands, and to remember them all accurately and

without confusion. The most astonishing feature of the

performance, aside from the perfect obedience of the huge beasts,

was their easy confidence and accuracy of memory.

We come now to a consideration of the Accomplishments of Working

Elephants. In all the timber-forests of southern India every

captive elephant is taught to perform all the following acts and

services, as I have witnessed on many occasions:

1. To _salaam,_ or salute, by raising the trunk.

2. To kneel, to receive a load or a passenger.

3. When standing, to hold up a fore-foot, to serve the driver as a

step in climbing to his place.

4. To lie down to be washed, first on one side and then on the

other.

5. To open the mouth. 6. To "hand up" any article from the

ground to the reach of a person riding.

7. To pull down an obstructing bough.

8. To halt.

9. To back.

10. To pick up the end of a drag-rope and place it between the

teeth.

11. To drag a timber.

12. To kneel and with the head turn a log over, or turn it with

the tusks if any are present.

13. To push a log into position parallel with others.

14. To balance and carry timbers on the tusks, if possessing tusks

of sufficient size.

15. To "speak," or trumpet.

16. To work in harness.

Every working elephant in India is supposed to possess the

intelligence necessary to the performance of all the acts

enumerated above at the command of his driver, either by spoken

words, a pressure of the knees or feet, or a touch with the

driving goad. For the sake of generalization I have purposely

excluded from this list all tricks and accomplishments which are

not universally taught to working elephants. We have seen,

however, that performing elephants are capable of executing

nearly double the number of acts commonly taught to the workers;

and, while it is useless to speculate upon the subject, it must be

admitted that, were a trainer to test an elephant's memory by

ascertaining the exact number of commands it could remember and

execute in rotation, the result would far exceed anything yet

obtained. For my own part, I believe it would exceed a hundred.

The performance in the circus-ring is limited by time and space,

and not by the mental capacity of the elephants.

Comprehension under Training. When we come to consider the

comparative mental receptivity and comprehension of animals under

man's tuition, we find the elephant absolutely unsurpassed. On

account of the fact that an elephant is about eighteen years in

coming to anything like maturity, according to the Indian

Government standard for working animals, it is far more economical

and expeditious to catch full-grown elephants in their native

jungles, and train them, than it is to breed and rear them. About

ninety per cent of all the elephants now living in captivity were

caught in a wild state and tamed, and of the remainder at least

eighty per cent were born in captivity of females that were gravid

when captured. It will be seen, therefore, that the elephant has

derived no advantage whatever from ancestral association with man,

and has gained nothing from the careful selection and breeding

which, all combined, have made the collie dog, the pointer and the

setter the wonderfully intelligent animals they are. For many

generations the horse has been bred for strength, for speed, or

for beauty of form, but the breeding of the dog has been based

_chiefly_ on his intelligence as a means to an end. _With

all his advantages, it is to be doubted whether the comprehensive

faculties of the dog, even in the most exceptional individuals of

a whole race, are equal to those of the adult wild elephant fresh

from the jungle._

The extreme difficulty of teaching a dog _of mature age_ even

the simplest thing is so well known that it has passed into a

proverb: "It is hard to teach an old dog new tricks." In other

words, the conditions _must_ be favorable. But what is the

case with the elephant? The question shall be answered by G. P.

Sanderson. In his "Wild Beasts of India," he says: "_Nor are

there any elephants which can not be easily subjugated, whatever

their size or age. The largest and oldest elephants are frequently

the most easily tamed, as they are less apprehensive than the

younger ones._"

Philosophy of the Elephant in Accepting Captivity and Making the

Best of It. The most astounding feature in the education of an

elephant is the suddenness of his transition from a wild and

lawless denizen of the forest to the quiet, plodding, good-

tempered, and cheerful beast of draught or burden. I call it

astounding, because in comparison with what could _not_ be

done with other wild animals caught when adult, no other word is

adequate to express the difference. The average wild animal caught

fully grown is "a terror," and so far as training is concerned,

perfectly impossible.

There takes place in the keddah, or pen of capture, a mighty

struggle between the giant strength of the captive and the

ingenuity of man, ably seconded by a few powerful tame elephants.

When he finds his strength utterly overcome by man's intelligence,

he yields to the inevitable, and accepts the situation

philosophically. Sanderson once had a narrow escape from death

while on the back of a tame elephant inside a keddah, attempting

to secure a wild female. She fought his elephant long and

viciously, with the strength and courage of despair, but finally

she was overcome by superior numbers. Although her attack on

Sanderson in the keddah was of the most murderous description, he

states that her conduct after her defeat was most exemplary, and

she never afterward showed any signs of ill-temper.

Mr. Sanderson and an elephant-driver once mounted a full-grown

female elephant _on the sixth day after her capture, without

even the presence of a tame animal._ Sir Emerson Tennent

records an instance wherein an elephant fed from the hand on the

first night of its capture, and in a very few days evinced

pleasure at being patted on the head. Such instances as the above

can be multiplied indefinitely. To what else shall they be

attributed than philosophic reasoning on the part of the elephant?

The orang-utan and the chimpanzee, so often put forward as his

intellectual superior, when captured alive at any other period

than that of helpless infancy, are vicious, aggressive, and

intractable not only for weeks and months, but for the remainder

of their lives. Orangs captured when fully adult exhibit the most

tiger-like ferocity, and are wholly intractable.

If dogs are naturally superior to elephants in natural intellect,

it should be as easy to tame and educate newly-caught wild dogs or

wolves of mature age, as newly-caught elephants. But, so far from

this being the case, it is safe to assert that it would be

_impossible_ to train even the most intelligent company of

pointers, setters or collies ever got together to perform the

feats accomplished with such promptness and accuracy by all

regularly trained work elephants.

The successful training of all elephants up to the required

working point is so fully conceded in India that the market value

of an animal depends wholly upon its age, sex, build and the

presence or absence of good tusks. The animal's education is

either sufficient for the buyer, or, if it is not, he knows it can

be made so.

Promptness and Accuracy in the Execution of Man's Orders. This is

the fourth quality which serves as a key to the mental capacity

and mental processes of an animal.

To me the most impressive feature of a performance of elephants in

the circus-ring is the fact that every command uttered is obeyed

with true military promptness and freedom from hesitation, and so

accurately that an entire performance often is conducted and

concluded without the repetition of a single command. One by one

the orders are executed with the most human-like precision and

steadiness, amounting sometimes to actual nonchalance. Human

beings of the highest type scarcely could do better. To some

savage races--for example, the native Australians, the Veddahs of

Ceylon, or the Jackoons of the Malay Peninsula, I believe that

such a performance would be impossible, even under training. I do

not believe their minds act with sufficient rapidity and accuracy

to enable a company of them to go through with such a wholly

artificial performance as successfully as the elephants do.

The thoughtful observer does not need to be told that the brain of

the ponderous quadruped acts, as far as it goes, with the same

rapidity and precision as that of an intelligent man,--and this,

too, in a performance that is wholly artificial and acquired.

In the performance of Bartholomew's horses, of which I once kept a

record in detail, even the most accomplished members of his troupe

often had to be commanded again and again before they would obey.

A command often was repeated for the fifth or sixth time before

the desired result was obtained. I noted particularly that not one

of his horses,--which were the most perfectly trained of any ever

seen by me,--was an exception to this rule, or performed his

tasks with the prompt obedience and self-confidence so noticeable

in _each one_ of the sixteen Barnum elephants. The horses

usually obeyed with tardiness and hesitation, and very often

manifested nervousness and uncertainty.

In the mind of the elephant, e. g., _each_ elephant, there

was no confusion of ideas or lapses of memory, but, on the

contrary, the mental grasp on the whole subject was so secure and

comprehensive that the animal felt himself the master of the

situation.

I have never yet seen a performance of trained dogs which could be

considered worthy of serious comparison with the accomplishments

of either performing or working elephants. In the matter of native

educational capacity the dog can not on any grounds be considered

the rival of the elephant. The alleged mental superiority of the

dog is based almost wholly upon his powers of independent

reasoning and observation as exhibited in a state of almost

perfect _freedom._ Until the elephant who has grown to

maturity under man's influence, is allowed the dog's freedom to

plan and execute, no conclusive comparison between them can be

made.

The Minds and Manners of Wild Animals: A Book of Personal Observations · 第 8 / 24 段