Among those who, according to Landini, met together at Camaldoli on a

summer day of 1468, were several whose life-work was bound up in

revising, editing and translating the great works of antiquity. The

first to arrive were the two young Medici, Lorenzo, afterwards surnamed

the Magnificent, and his brother Giuliano, who was afterwards stabbed in

the rising organised by the Pazzi. They were accompanied by Alemanno

Rinuccini, who is known for his translation of some of Plutarch’s

Lives; by Donato Acciajuoli, the author of a commentary on Aristotle; by

Donato’s brother Piero; by Marco Parenti, and by Antonio Canegiano,

“most learned men,” Landini calls them, “who had studied eloquence for

years and who had gained proficiency in philosophical discussion by

means of arduous study.” They were resting at the hermitage when Landini

describes himself as arriving. He brought his brother with him. Landini

is chiefly remembered among us for his commentary on Dante, but he also

wrote commentaries on Horace and Virgil. He taught Latin at the

newly-founded Academy of Florence, and in later days he became

Chancellor of the Republic.

The party had barely exchanged greetings when the news was brought that

two other friends had arrived at the monastery, where they were leaving

their horses to come up to the Eremo on foot, led by the prior Mariotto.

The order of Camaldoli had recently lost a shining light in its general,

Ambrogio Traversari, known as _il famoso Greco_, who not only read Greek

but spoke it with fluency. Mariotto was his pupil. The men he was

conducting were Leone Battista Alberti, and Marsilio Ficino--men as

different as possible in appearance and bearing, but who stand as

representative figures of the Italian Renaissance, each in a special

direction.

Whoever came into contact with Leone Battista felt that the gods had

bestowed on him the fulness of their gifts, for he set the mark of

originality on whatever he handled. His many-sidedness in after days was

only excelled by that of Lionardo da Vinci. As a mere youth, Leon

Battista wrote a comedy which passed for a rediscovered classic; and he

is the author of the first treatises on painting, sculpture and

architecture that can lay claim to a scientific basis. He worked as an

architect, and the front of Santa Maria Novella at Florence was his

design. He was a famous talker, a man of clever sayings, and eloquent in

praise of beauty wherever he found it--in art, in nature and in man.

From youth upwards he was renowned for his agility, and increasing years

dealt kindly with his good looks. At the time of his coming to Camaldoli

he was in the sixties.

Marsilio Ficino, whom he is here described as having met on his way from

Rome, was the greatest Hellenist of his age and the keenest intellect

among the older Florentine humanists. Small, frail and visionary, he

combined in himself the qualities that distinguish and endear the

typical scholar--patience, sagacity, preciseness, extreme modesty and a

high tone of mental elevation. His fame rests on his translation into

Latin of the works of Plato, and he was the colleague of Landini at the

Florentine Academy, where he taught Greek. In the large fresco of

Domenico Ghirlandajo in Santa Maria Novella at Florence, Marsilio Ficino

and Landini are both represented among the painter’s distinguished

contemporaries.

Such were the men who met together at the hermitage of Camaldoli,

upwards of four hundred years ago, rejoicing in the thought of spending

a few days together. On the first day they rested. On the next they

attended mass, and then they sallied forth into the forest, and there,

under a spreading beech, they sat down and Leone Battista opened the

discussion. Starting from the fact that the responsibilities of public

life were about to devolve on the two young Medici owing to the

ill-health of their father, he spoke of the duties of a citizen, and

passed on to compare the respective merits of a life of activity and of

a life of contemplation. This was a favourite subject of discussion at

the time, and Leone Battista ended by pronouncing in favour of

contemplation, a view which was in accordance with Plato’s ideality and

with the Christian exaltation of Mary above Martha. On the following day

the same subject was discussed in the same company, and on the days

after they spoke of the greatest good and of the true aim of human

existence. No doubt these _Conversations_ are largely of Landini’s

making, but they were much appreciated by his contemporaries, and

Marsilio Ficino is known to have admired them greatly. They were often

reprinted at that period; now they have fallen into oblivion, and only

the student now and again disturbs the dust which accumulates round them

on the bookshelf.

On leaving the hermitage we had intended ascending to the _Prato al

Soglio_, from where there is a splendid view, and from there crossing

the mountains by a path which led to Badia a Prataglia. But owing to the

snow that lay behind the Eremo this was impossible, and we found

ourselves instead on a grassy road skirting the mountain always at about

the same level. From one point of this road we looked down on the huge

monastery of Camaldoli; further along and the outlook was over

apparently limitless masses of pine forest; further again and the slopes

below us were clothed with beeches, their leafless branches just touched

by the first tinge of red. Finally we were out again on the bare

mountain, with the panorama of the Apennines about us, and Serravalle

with its tower hanging far below in the blue mist like a bird. The road

now became a rough path over uneven, mountainous ground, such as we had

crossed on the previous day, but we were at a higher elevation, and the

surroundings of sky and scenery were proportionately grander.

I have often thought that the sky of different mountainous regions is

different, just as the sea along different lines of the coast varies.

Whether we have seen the Mediterranean in sunny weather or in rough, we

carry away with us the impression of its restless readiness to run to

froth be it counter to a breeze or against a jutting headland. Similarly

the North Sea stays with us in its glassy reluctance to break, and the

Atlantic in the mighty inherent roll of its waves. As great a difference

in character belongs to the sky of different mountainous regions, though

it is less easily fixed in word and thought. To me heaviness and

sullenness seemed to characterise the sky of the Apennines; once it sank

into the mountains, there it stayed. The obvious reason was the poor

clothing of the soil and the want of running water; there were none of

those surface currents which carry down and dissolve the mists of thick

weather elsewhere. For once outside the forest region of Camaldoli,

there was a marked want of trees and a marked want of water. The

denudation of the soil is something terrible, and already in April many

streams were running dry.

The path we followed had many beautiful outlooks, but there was a good

deal of snow, and we had come far out of our way. We were glad at last

to catch sight of the white line of the driving road into Romagna

winding in and out among the mountains below, for the days in April are

short. In this case a shower of rain caused us to put on additional

speed; we were down in the road before dark, and soon afterwards

established in comfortable quarters at the Casa Rossi. This is no inn,

in the ordinary sense of the word--the family let the upper part of

their house in summer--but they took us in for a couple of nights and

made us welcome.

Badia a Prataglia lies at about an hour’s distance below the pass of the

driving road from the Casentino into Romagna. The place boasted of one

of the oldest abbacies in the Apennines, which dated its foundation

further back than St Romuald and Camaldoli. But in course of time the

abbacy of Prataglia lost its standing, while that of the monastery of

Camaldoli increased, with the result that the older abbey became a

dependency of the newer monastery. At present nothing remains of the old

settlement but the convent church. But Prataglia itself is a growing

place. Its numerous houses lie scattered in groups up and down the

valley, and there are several new villa residences belonging to families

who come up from Romagna and Tuscany to escape the heat of the summer. A

_pension_ situated some distance above the place on the hills is fast

becoming a favourite summer resort.

The Rossi at whose house we stayed are the originators and the owners of

a home industry which has considerably raised the standard of comfort

throughout the district. The firm exports simple wooden furniture, the

different parts of which are cut and carved to certain patterns in the

various homes and fitted together on the premises. That evening being

Saturday, men were coming to the house bringing their week’s work, in

exchange for which they carried away payment in money or payment in kind

from the store kept by the Rossi. We were shown examples of the articles

manufactured--chairs, stools, cradles and such like, all of the simplest

shape. Among other things, we were shown a spinning-wheel, but we were

told that the attempt to introduce it has failed. The Italian women

prefer spinning from the distaff, and it seems obvious that they will

continue to do so till the use of machines supersedes hand-labour.

Rain, wind, hail, a thunderstorm and a snowstorm, we experienced them

all in the one day which we spent exploring the heights of the

neighbouring pass. But with a good road within reach and food awaiting

one under cover, battling with the elements for a time adds to one’s

enjoyment. Then the reflection came that the snow prevented progress

along the mountain paths, and we determined to return into the valley.

We left Prataglia white in its wintry garb, and in the short space of an

afternoon we passed from the nipping blasts of winter into the bright

geniality of spring. Below Serravalle the falling snowflakes changed

into driving mists. As the mountains receded, the valley of the Arno lay

before us, its vineyards and cornfields brown and golden in the light of

the afternoon sun. We were bound for Poppi, which lies at about an

hour’s distance up the valley from Bibbiena--“Poppi, the capital of the

Casentino,” as Vasari called it.

VI

_Poppi and Counts Guidi_

“Pupium agri Clusentini caput.”

(_Vasari._)

Poppi lies on a steep hill which rises abruptly from the valley of the

Arno, forming a vantage ground, as it were, in regard to the upper part

of the Casentino. The castle, its most notable feature, occupies the

highest part of this hill looking south. This is the ancient stronghold,

as it was rebuilt in the thirteenth century, curiously like the Palazzo

Vecchio at Florence, but more commanding in appearance owing to the

height on which it stands.

Poppi already in the tenth century was a centre of influence of the

Guidi, one of the most powerful families of Tuscany during the Middle

Ages. The property they owned extended far north and south of the

Apennines, and the Casentino bristled with their strongholds. Romena,

Porciano, Battifolle, Soci, all recall episodes in their history. With

the exception of Poppi, all these castles lie in ruins; their walls

stand desolate and their towers are open to wind and rain. Alone at

Poppi the palace with

[Illustration: CASTLE OF POPPI]

its soaring tower stands unbroken, a lasting monument of the power to

which the Guidi attained.

The annals of this family have engrossed the attention of historians

partly because the Guidi to some extent influenced the course of

Florentine history, partly because Dante repeatedly referred to them in

the _Divine Comedy_ and was in personal relation to several members of

the family. Their history goes back to the ninth century; in the

thirteenth the climax of their influence was reached. But in Dante’s

time the members of the family were still numerous, and in the

remoteness of the Casentino their power continued unimpaired.

Poppi nowadays is a town of some importance. A steep, paved path and a

driving road in wide zig-zags lead up into the town from Ponte di Poppi,

a suburb which has grown up on the Arno at the foot of the hill. The

paved path enters the town near the church, which lies on the point of

the ridge farthest away from the castle, and from the church one walks

up the main street with arcades and shops on either hand. And on either

hand, whenever a gap occurs between the houses, or a shop is thrown open

and a window appears in its depth, one looks right away across the dip

of the hill and the plains below into the green distance of the

mountains.

The place is first mentioned in the tenth century in connection with

Count Tegrimo Bevisangue, who, with his wife Gisla, founded the abbey of

Strumi in close proximity to the stronghold. The Guidi were of Langobard

descent. They were one of the noble families who had come into Italy as

part of a barbarian invasion, and who, in the course of time, came to

rank among the great feudatories of the Empire. A legendary colouring is

given to the opening chapter of their history, but its essentials are

corroborated by contemporary references. Count Tegrimo is the first

member of the family who figures in the annals of the Casentino. At the

time he was the sole surviving member of the family. His father, Count

Guido, married Engelrada, the daughter of Duke Martino of Ravenna. This

gave him a place of authority at Ravenna. But a dispute arose between

him and the archbishop; he caused the archbishop to be imprisoned. There

was a popular rising, and Count Guido and all his family were put to

death--all excepting Tegrimo, who was saved by his nurse. The name

Bevisangue afterwards attached to him either because of the revenge he

took on his father’s murderers, or else because he had contracted a

habit of licking his sword after he had spilt blood.

At the time when Tegrimo founded Strumi--the original site of which is

said to be marked by a church which is seen from Poppi lying in the

midst of dark cypresses--the family already owned strongholds near

Pistoja and Florence and the stronghold of Modigliana above Faenza,

which is identical with the Castrum Mutilum mentioned by Livy. One by

one the strongholds with which the counts fortified their possessions,

or which they snatched from their neighbours, appear in the annals of

the family. Tegrimo’s son Guido dated a charter from Porciano, which is

situated at the uppermost end of the Casentino, a proof that here also a

stronghold on a commanding site was in their possession.

Historians of a later date--Malespini and Villani, the contemporary of

Dante--state that the ancestor of the Guidi came into Italy with the

Saxon Emperor Otto I. and from him received the castle of Modigliana.

Also that Otto IV. on his passage through Florence saw Gualdrada, the

daughter of the rich citizen Berti, and that his follower, one of the

Guidi, married her and received the Casentino in dower. As the Guidi

owned Modigliana before Otto I. came to Italy, and held extensive

property in the Casentino long before the days of Gualdrada, these

stories in themselves are untrue, but a true estimation of facts

underlies them. The Saxon emperors, in order to strengthen their

authority over the greater barons of Italy, favoured the lesser, and

among them they favoured the Guidi. The Count Guido who married

Gualdrada was on good terms both with Florence and Otto IV.

After the time of Bevisangue we find the Guidi steadily increasing in

power, fighting against other lords and against rising communes,

sometimes on their own account, sometimes in support of the Imperial

policy. True representatives of the rural nobility, they were at once

turbulent and prosperous, and they made their influence felt in

ecclesiastical as well as in other matters. It was owing to protection

given him by a lady member of the Guidi family that Giovanni Gualberto

became the founder of Vallombrosa, and in three different generations a

member of the family was bishop of Pistoja. At the close of the eleventh

century a father and a son Guido were in frequent attendance on Countess

Matilda, the daughter and heir of the last margrave of Tuscany, whose

strenuous opposition to the Imperial policy and support of the claims of

Tuscany secured her lasting popularity. Probably to secure the father’s

interest she adopted the son, to whom the surname _il Marchese_ attached

in consequence. This Count Guido in his youth joined the first crusade,

and was imprisoned by Saladin. Property was mortgaged with the canons of

Pistoja to pay for his ransom. After his father’s death he bestowed land

on the faithful follower who had shared his hardships.

Count Guido _il Marchese_ favoured various schemes conducive to his

vassals’ welfare. He helped to carry out the plan of building the

aqueduct by which Pistoja is provided with water from the hills; he

became the founder of the city of Empoli; he built a leprosy near Poppi.

About the year 1106 the “Great” Countess Matilda gave up the plan of

constituting him her heir and bestowed her extensive property on the

Church. Matilda enjoyed such popularity throughout Tuscany, that songs

in praise of her were long sung in the churches of Florence according to

Boccaccio. In the _Divine Comedy_ she is described as guardian of the

earthly Paradise, in which she led the way to the triumph of the Church.

In remembrance of her the name Contessa or Tessa continues frequent to

this day. The reader will recall the sweet _contadina_ of Romola. In the

Casentino Matilda is popularly credited with building a number of

churches which are remarkable for the sculpture which adorns them.

One of these churches, that of San Martino di Vado, is about an hour’s

walk from Poppi up the valley of the Solano; another flanks the hill of

Romena; a third is at Stia, and another is at Montemignajo, high up a

side valley. The column capitals inside these churches deserve attention

for the place they claim in the history of early Tuscan sculpture. Not

two of them are alike, and the way the foliage and figures on them is

treated is always quaint and often beautiful. I have sometimes thought

what a gain it would be if some of the numerous amateur photographers

one meets would combine and systematically go over separate districts,

issuing a list of the views taken by them. In the Casentino only a few

general views were obtainable, and we in vain sought to procure

photographs of interesting remains; I ignore if any have been taken. In

this case one longed for photographs of these capitals to compare them

with the early sculptures of Pistoja and Arezzo. One of the columns in

the church of Romena bore the date 1152--the earliest sculptures at

Pistoja are dated 1166--and the erection of the parish church at Arezzo

belongs to the same period. As a direct connection existed between these

places at the time owing to the rights of overlordship held by the

Guidi, it may be owing to their influence that a style of sculpture

which has so much of the Langobard spirit came to be introduced into the

different parts of Tuscany.

The Count Guido, to whose lifetime the erection of these churches

belongs, was the son of Guido _il Marchese_, and was known himself as

Guidoguerra. In him the influence of the family reached its climax. The

vastness of his possessions was such that Sanzanome, the earliest

historian of Florence, spoke of them as

[Illustration: COURTYARD OF CASTLE, POPPI (CASENTINO)]

constituting a state or province in themselves. Moreover, he was a

shining representative of knighthood. His contemporary, the Bishop Otto

of Freysing, described him as the most powerful lord of Tuscany, and

Tolosanus, the chronicler of Faenza, who knew him, spoke of him as

holding the foremost place in honour and courtesy. “All Italy wept at

his death and especially Faenza,” he tells us, for the city of Faenza

had appealed to him for help on account of the encroachments made on its

territory by the city of Forli, and had found in him a powerful

protector. The acts of Count Guidoguerra argue in favour of his mental

horizon being wide. He joined the crusade of 1147, he stood in high

esteem with the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa, and the enterprises he led

in Italy were invariably successful. It was only by taking advantage of

his temporary absence that the citizens of Florence succeeded in

destroying Montedicroce, a most important stronghold of his which had

therefore become an object of hatred to Florence.

For the city of Florence, as it increased in importance, was bent on

improving the conditions of its trade. Florence is surrounded by hills,

and these hills in the twelfth century bristled with the strongholds of

nobles, who were ready to swoop down and plunder the trains of passing

traders on the slightest provocation. In the interest of its further

development the city was prompted to make war on the surrounding

nobility, attacks which went hand-in-hand with a policy that was

productive of important and unexpected changes.

The first attempts of the Florentines to subdue their troublesome

neighbours belonged to the lifetime of Guido _il Marchese_. Emboldened

by success, and encouraged by the inactivity of the margraves, they

attacked Fiesole, the ancient Etruscan city which towered high above

Florentine territory, for here, as Villani related, the rural nobles,

whom he designated as _cattani_, collected and harboured outlaws who did

damage to the trade and the territory of Florence. The undertaking

proved successful in the campaigns of 1123-1125, and large parts of

Fiesole were razed to the ground. Its “destruction” was followed by

attacks on Montegrifone, which belonged to the Ormanni, and on

Monteboni, which belonged to the Buondelmonti. A special significance

attached to the latter event. For the Florentines, intent on securing

friendly relations with their neighbours, made it a condition of peace

that the nobles they defeated should reside inside Florence during a

stated part of the year. The first to agree to the arrangement were the

Buondelmonti; they were followed by a number of others, including the

Guidi, who were nothing loth to gain a foothold inside the city. To the

older inhabitants of Florence, which included the greater citizens--the

_illustri cittadini_ of Dante--and the lesser citizens, a third element

was now added in the form of the rural nobles, who soon contracted a

taste for city life while they remained indifferent to its

responsibilities. They came into Florence with crowds of retainers; they

built themselves houses which were strongholds to all intents and

purposes; they fought out their private feuds inside the city walls, and

as soon as occasion offered they turned the balance of the constitution

in their favour. And more than this. They brought with them a taste for

display and splendour which subverted all accepted standards, and which

put an end to the simplicity and soberness of the older Florentines.

In the eye of Dante the influx of these rural nobles was a reason of the

city’s misfortune. “Ever was the confusion of persons the origin of the

city’s ills,” are the words which he put into the mouth of his ancestor

Cacciaguida. Cacciaguida in the _Comedy_ compares the state of Florence

as it was in Dante’s time with what it had been a century and a half

before, and he deplores the increased luxuriousness of the Florentines.

In those simpler days “Bellincion Berti went about in leathern belt with

bone clasp, and his dame came from the mirror unpainted.”

This Bellincion Berti and his wife were the parents of the lady

Gualdrada, through whom not the Casentino, as Villani recorded, but the

valuable Ravignani property in Florence near the Porta San Piero came

into the possession of the Guidi. Gualdrada was the second wife of Count

Guido, surnamed il Vecchio, and the epithet _buona_ which Dante bestowed

on her she doubtless owed to her attempts to soften her husband’s

fierceness. For Guido Vecchio in the eyes of the chronicler of Faenza

was the direct opposite of his father; knightly dignity and pride with

him took the form of wilfulness and overbearing.

The incidents which led up to the marriage and its outcome are worth

recording. Guido Vecchio began as the loyal supporter of the Imperial

cause; he entertained Frederick Barbarossa in his castle at Modigliana,

in 1167, and with the Imperial troops he marched on Rome, where

Frederick succeeded in establishing the anti-pope. But the desire for

municipal freedom was awakening in the smaller cities of Italy, and in

order to frustrate the Emperor’s influence they began to form alliances

among themselves and supported Pope Alexander. A struggle ensued which

lasted seventeen years and in which Guido sided with the Emperor,

thereby finding himself repeatedly plunged into war with Florence, and

into supporting her rival Siena. When the Emperor and the Pope finally

made peace at Venice, the relations between the cities of Tuscany were

readjusted. Among the representatives of Florence who arranged the peace

between this city and Siena was Bellincion Berti, the father of

Gualdrada. In what year Guido married her is unknown, but he divorced

his first wife Agnes in order to do so. His attitude towards Florence

underwent a complete change in consequence. Henceforth there was

friendship between them.

In other respects Guido lost ground. In opposing the growing

municipalities he was tempted to strain his authority, with the result

that he was defied more than once. Thus on one occasion he ordered his

vassals at Modigliana to pull down their houses and rebuild them on the

hill for greater safety. For five weeks they resisted, then they

destroyed their houses and went to Faenza, which was outside their

lord’s jurisdiction. This led to a war between the Count and the city of

Faenza which extended over years. On another occasion he went to

Camaldoli and carried off all the weapons which he found there to Poppi.

He restored them afterwards, but only in return for an enormous amount

of grain. Again he disputed with the nunnery of Rosano and won his

suit, but in this case Countess Gualdrada carried the decision in person

to Rosano, and declaring it annulled she tore it up. The acts of Guido

Vecchio were such that the Pope wrote to him in his old age urging him

to reform his ways, but even the warnings of a Pope were defied with

impunity by these barons.

When Count Guido Vecchio died in the year 1213, the family split into

five branches, each of his sons taking the name of count of the chief

stronghold which fell to his share. Poppi in the first instance fell to

Count Guido Magnifico of Bagno, then to his sons Guido Novello and

Simone. The acts of these brothers, and the enmity which arose between

them, take us into the very thick of the contentions which agitated

Florence in the thirteenth century.

The terms Guelf and Ghibelline were used in Florence since 1215, marking

the different tendencies of the citizens. The Guidi, like most other

rural nobles, were Ghibellines; they wished to see the power of the city

kept within certain limits, and in this they were opposed to the Guelf

or patriotic party. Guido Novello and Simone, with other Ghibellines,

left Florence for a time in 1248; ten years later they were altogether

banished from the city. Shortly afterwards they fought at the battle of

Montaperti, when the Florentines were beaten and the river Arbia, as

Dante has it, ran red with blood. It was then that Count Guido Novello

made the proposal that the city of Florence should be razed from the

face of the earth, an insult which the Florentine patriotic party never

forgave him. Farinate degli Uberti, also a Ghibelline, but one who felt

some affection for the city, successfully opposed him; he is represented

by Dante in Hell recalling this fact to the poet’s mind. Florence

remained standing, but for the next six years it was at the mercy of the

Ghibellines. Guido Novello, supported by the troops of King Manfred,

ruled in a spirit which was little calculated to soften the acrimony of

the Florentines against him. He caused Poppi to be fortified by a new

wall in 1260; he then built the Porta Ghibellina at Florence, and

constructed a new road out of it so as to be in direct communication

with the Casentino. This road (the paved path which leads over the

Consuma and along the valley of the Solano) he used to convey to Poppi

crossbows, bucklers and armour which he abstracted from the arsenal at

Florence. Villani tells how he showed his castle and these weapons to

his uncle Tegrimo, Count of Modigliana and Porciano, asking him what he

thought of them. Tegrimo replied that he liked them well enough, but

that he knew the Florentines only “lent at a high rate of usury.”

Subsequent events proved the truth of the remark. When King Manfred was

overthrown, Guido Novello lost his support and was obliged to leave

Florence. He did so without much dignity, and stones were thrown at him

as he left the city. Twenty years later, at the instigation of the

Bishop of Arezzo, he and other Ghibellines collected an army in the

Casentino to march upon Florence. The Florentines came over the

mountains and defeated them and ravaged the territory which belonged to

the Guidi. And in the following year they came back and made an assault

on Poppi, and finding the arms there which the Count had abstracted,

they carried them back to Florence in triumph.

The battle in which the Florentines fought the Ghibellines in the plain

of Campaldino below Poppi on June 11, 1289, is memorable since Dante, at

the time a youth of twenty-four, fought in the ranks of the victorious

Guelfs. He referred to the fact himself in a letter, in which he said

how he found himself “no mere child in the practice of arms, and was in

great fear, and in the end rejoiced greatly through the varying fortunes

of the battle.” For luck at first went against the Florentines; the

Ghibellines gained an advantage, but they did not follow it up. Guido

Novello, who was now an old man, backed upon Poppi, the Bishop of

Arezzo fell fighting, and Buonconte, another Ghibelline leader, was

wounded and fled. In the _Divine Comedy_ Buonconte is represented giving

an account of his flight to Dante--how with pierced and bleeding throat

he reached the point where the Archiano falls into the Arno, and how the

waters carried him away and his final resting-place was never known.

[Illustration: STATUE OF COUNT GUIDO, CASTLE OF POPPI]

Guido Novello, who backed upon Poppi, cannot have stayed there, as the

place was no longer his and no longer a stronghold of the Ghibellines.

It had passed to his brother Simone and his son Guido of Battifolle, and

Simone and his son, according to Villani, went over to the Guelfs

because of Guido Novello’s cruelty. When therefore the Florentines made

an assault on Poppi, they were damaging the property of a Guelf and an

ally. Guido of Battifolle, sometimes also called Guido Novello, the son

of Simone, pleaded in Florence for damage done to his property, and he

received the sum of twelve hundred lire, which he spent in re-building

his castle.

It is owing to this sequence of events that the remote little town of

Poppi came to boast of its remarkable castle. Vasari in his _Lives of

the Painters and Architects_ tells us that Jacopo Lapo, called il

Tedesco, “built many buildings in the Gothic style in Tuscany, among

them the palace at Poppi in the Casentino.” And in the life of Arnolfo,

whom Vasari wrongly called the son of Jacopo (he was his pupil), he adds

that Arnolfo built the palace of the Signory at Florence on the plan of

what his father had constructed at Poppi.

As one emerged from the streets and entered the open space before the

castle the contrast was striking between our peace-loving, law-abiding

age and that period when life was bound up with warfare. Trees veiled in

spring foliage cast a fitful shadow over what was formerly an open

ground for free fighting; near the ruined castle walls children played

and old people loitered in the sun. We entered the courtyard without let

or hindrance, and then the sound of a tinkling bell brought out a

Government _custode_. With him we ascended to the first floor by the

skilfully-constructed open-air staircase which leads from floor to floor

round the four sides of the court. He led the way into the large hall, a

beautiful room with carved and coloured beams and double arched windows

set high in the thickness of the wall. We wandered from room to room and

from storey to storey. Fragments of partitions taken down, of glaring

wall-papers torn from the walls, of brick and mortar, lay about here and

there--disfigurements of a later date which are now in course of being

removed. After centuries of concealment the ceiling construction and the

old fresco decorations of the walls were being bared to the light of

day, for the castle is now in the hands of the Government and is in

course of restoration as a national monument. The palace chapel

contained curious frescoes attributed to Spinello Aretino and Jacopo del

Casentino. Remains of old wall-painting in curious patterns and of

earlier date decorated the dining and other halls. We ascended to the

uppermost storey, and there in the way of a caryatide supporting a leafy

volute, on which rested the inner cornice of the roof, stood the figure

of Count Guido of Battifolle, the son of Simone, carved in stone. It is

a beautiful youthful figure, the uncovered head full of clustering

curls, the face strong and somewhat defiant in expression, the body

clad in plate-mail, with the one hand holding a short dagger, and the

other resting on the hilt of a long sword. Whose the thought thus to

place the owner of the palace, who the artist to carry it out, are not

recorded, but as it stands the figure may well have delighted him who

made it and him whom it represents.

[Illustration: ARMS OF THE GUIDI]

VII

_Capo d’Arno_

“Per mezzo Toscana si spazia

Un fiumicel che nasce in Falterona

E cento miglia di corso nol sazia.”

(_Purg._ 14, 18 ff.)

As one wandered about the palace and the streets of Poppi, the thought

arose if and under what circumstances Dante stayed here. He is known to

have come into the Casentino during the early part of his exile--that

is, about the year 1305; he was here again in March and April of 1311,

as is proved by the letters he wrote and dated from here. One of these

contains the fierce invective against Florence, the other expresses the

fears which the poet apprehended from the Emperor’s delay. They are

dated “on the confines of Tuscany near the springs of the Arno,” and on

the strength of this expression the strongholds of Poppi, Romena and

Porciano, besides Pratovecchio, claim to have harboured the poet.

These different strongholds, at the beginning of the fourteenth century,

were still in the possession of different branches of the Guidi family.

The castle of Pratovecchio was owned by Count Guido Selvatico, who

belonged to

[Illustration: CHURCH OF ROMENA (CASENTINO)]

the branch of the family which embraced Guelf sympathies. He fought on

the side of the Guelfs at Campaldino, at Florence he afterwards joined

the Neri, and his sympathies were therefore akin to those of Dante.

Boccaccio tells us that Dante enjoyed the hospitality of Guido

Selvatico, and this would be during the early part of his exile. The

wife of Guido Selvatico was Manessa, the daughter of Buonconte, who

perished at Campaldino, and it is generally supposed that Dante’s

relation to Manessa caused him to introduce the account of Buonconte’s

flight into the _Comedy_.

There is extant a letter of Dante, in which he describes how, after

setting foot by the streams of the Arno, he made the acquaintance of a

woman whom he thought in all respects suited to his inclination, his

character and his fortunes. This lady so inspired him that he gave up

his resolve to keep aloof from women and from songs about women. He

composed a canzone in her praise, a copy of which he appended to the

letter. But the lady’s name and her whereabouts have always remained a

mystery.

From which of the other strongholds Dante dated the letters of 1311 is

difficult to decide. The expression “Capo d’Arno” may well refer to

Poppi, which is the first place reached coming over the hills from

Florence by the old road. Its castle, as we have seen, was owned at this

time by the younger Count Guido of Battifolle, who, after his uncle’s

death, was called Guido Novello, and who, after re-building the castle,

quietly dwelt there. He was comparatively peace-loving, and lived on

friendly terms with his cousin of Pratovecchio; their sons too were

friends. When the Emperor, in 1312, summoned the Guidi to join him in

his march on Florence, Guido Novello the younger did not respond to the

call, but sent troops in aid of the city. He became _podestà_ of

Florence a few years later, and it was during the term of his rule that

the proposal was tendered to Dante to return to Florence, but on terms

which the poet felt unable to accept.

Villani tells us that this Count Guido caused a large part of the

Palazzo Vecchio to be rebuilt on the plan of his palace at Poppi.

Perhaps this act caused his portrait to be introduced in a fresco of the

Capella degli Spagnuoli, one of the greatest monuments of

fourteenth-century art. The Count, who stands as a beardless youth on

the staircase at Poppi, is here represented in manhood. He is seen in

profile, forming one of a group which includes Cimabue, Boccaccio,

Petrarch and Laura.

The wife of this Count Guido was Gherardesca, the daughter of Count

Ugolino, who with his sons died of starvation at Pisa. The description

of their sufferings is among the most terrible of the _Divine Comedy_.

Several letters have recently come to light addressed by Gherardesca to

Margaret, the consort of the Emperor, and, partly because these letters

are preserved with the letters of Dante, partly because of certain

peculiarities in their style, the opinion has been advanced that they

were drafted by Dante. One of them is of the year 1311 and is dated from

Poppi.

Among the _Novelle_, or short stories, which Sacchetti put into writing

in the fourteenth century, one (nr. 179) tells what befell one day when

Countess Gherardesca of Poppi, and Countess Manessa of Pratovecchio,

were crossing Campaldino together. It is intended to illustrate the

sharp tongue and ready wit of the female sex. Gherardesca was a proud

lady, and she attracted her companion’s attention to the promising state

of the harvest. With reference to the defeat of the Ghibellines there,

among whom Buonconte, Manessa’s father, had fought, she remarked that

the corn no doubt stood so high in consequence of the blood that had

been spilt there. But Manessa met her in the same spirit. Alluding to

the death by starvation of Ugolino, the father of Gherardesca, she

replied that they would no doubt enjoy a fine harvest provided they did

not die of starvation before it was ripe. Gherardesca pretended not to

understand, and so they continued their walk together in peace.

While Dante’s relations with the owner of Poppi leave room for

conjecture, his connection with the Counts of Romena rests on a firm

foundation. The stronghold of Romena, judging by the position and extent

of its ruins, was the most imposing castle of the Casentino.

There was a Count Alessandro of Romena who was a leader of the Guelfs of

Tuscany against the Ghibellines in 1288. He afterwards joined the

Bianchi and was expelled from Florence. Later we find him captain of the

exiles at Arezzo. He led the attack on Florence which ensued, and died

shortly afterwards. Dante then addressed a letter of condolence to his

nephews, the Counts Oberto and Guido of Romena, in which he deplored the

death of one who had such greatness of soul, and added much to his

praise. He would have come to the funeral but that, being an exile, he

was deprived of the necessary horses and arms.

The idea has been accepted by some scholars and rejected by others that

this Count Alessandro was identical with the Count of Romena of the same

name, who, with Guido and another brother, employed the forger Adamo of

Brescia to coin false florins at Romena. The reader of Dante is familiar

with the figure of Adamo, whom the poet found in Hell, suffering from

dropsy and terrible thirst. He told him how he was burnt alive for his

acts at Romena, and how he longed for the sight of those who employed

him--one of the counts, he has heard, is already in Hell. Falsified

florins were discovered in 1281; a cairn on the road above Romena is

popularly held to mark the spot where Adamo was burnt. It is locally

known as the “Maccia del Uomo Morto,” and travellers not many years back

were wont to throw a stone on it in passing. The genealogy of the owners

of Romena, however, remains a matter of dispute. On the face of it, it

seems improbable that Dante thought well of the abettor of a forger, or

relegated a man he admired to Hell. Still these were stirring times of

changing sympathies, and though the view has been advanced that there

were two Counts Alessandro, uncle and nephew, the evidence brought

forward by Passerini, who argues that there was but one, has never been

conclusively disproved.

Above Romena, at the head of the valley, lie the ruins of Porciano, and

the expression “Capo d’Arno,” if taken literally, would apply to it. But

Dante’s relation with its counts is based on legend only. They were a

set of lawless, changeful men. There was a Count Guido of Porciano who

was condemned in 1282 by the city of Florence to pay five thousand lire

for murder, theft and arson. He had eight sons, and several of them were

fined in 1291 for waylaying and robbing a merchant from Ancona. In 1311

five of the brothers received the ambassadors of the Emperor at San

Godenzo and swore fealty to the Imperial cause, but four of them

afterwards deserted it. If Dante thought favourably of those of Porciano

for their Imperial sympathies, it cannot have lasted. For in describing

the sources of the Arno in the _Comedy_ he says that the river takes its

rise among “foul hogs more worthy of galls than of any food made for

the use of man,” with obvious reference to the meaning of the word

_porci_ as contained in the place-name Porciano.

A tradition is preserved, according to which the poet was kept prisoner

at Porciano, possibly after the battle of Campaldino. An anecdote

intended to illustrate his ready wit is localised here. The poet, we are

told, had left the castle and was walking down the hill when he met some

men from Florence, who were sent to take him into custody. They did not

recognise him, and asked if Dante were at Porciano, and he replied, “He

was there while I was!”

There seemed no end to the stories associated with Dante which were

localised in this neighbourhood. Palmieri, a writer of the early

fifteenth century, described an incident, which he says befell Dante on

Campaldino. The poet and the triumphant Guelfs after the battle pursued

the enemy as far as Bibbiena and beyond it, and on the third day they

returned to look for their friends and to bury the dead. Dante found a

friend, who either “was not quite dead or else suddenly revived,” and

who proceeded to describe what he had seen during these days of Hell and

Purgatory, words through which the whole plan of the _Comedy_ was

revealed to Dante. The account contains expressions which recall Dante’s

description, still it is sufficiently distinct. It rambles on over

about half a dozen pages in print without definite plan or purpose.

It was with a feeling of regret that we left Poppi, which played so

important a part in the history of the district. We left it early one

morning and crossed Campaldino, now, as six hundred years ago, green

with sprouting corn. Beyond it the driving road over the Consuma begins

its steady ascent along a mountain spur which is formed by the Arno and

its tributary the Solano. The old road branched off, following the

course of the Solano, and up this we went to explore.

I presume that foreigners carrying knapsacks for their convenience do

not often walk in these parts. We had been accosted before and asked

what our _roba_ was, and women especially joined us along the road in

hopes of driving a bargain in needles and scissors. In the valley of the

Solano our appearance brought concern to the heart of a professional

pedlar, who eyed us askance. When we came down the valley again in the

afternoon we were met by a woman, who told us she had been looking out

for us ever since we went past in the morning; might she see our wares?

She too looked upon us as rivals of the pedlar.

We found the narrow, tortuous valley of the Solano oppressive and

unattractive, and we did not penetrate much beyond Strada San Niccolo,

a town of high houses built close between the mountain sides. Here too

the history of many centuries lay condensed, as it were, in a nutshell.

The ancient church near the castle, now deserted--the ruins of the

castle itself, long a stronghold of the Guidi, which the growing Commune

destroyed in the fifteenth century--the modern city with its

manufactories--each represented a special phase in the history of

growing civilisation.

The city of Borgo-alla-Collina on the Consuma road, to which we

returned, bore a very different character. Situated on a breezy height,

its wide streets were grass-grown, and its low, rambling houses looked

desolate. Here Christofero Landini, the author of the _Conversations of

Camaldoli_, spent the last years of his life. He had been the teacher of

Lorenzo the Magnificent; he afterwards became Chancellor of the Republic

of Florence, and a palace at Borgo was given him in acknowledgment of

his services. Ampère, in his _Voyages dantesques_, tells an amusing

incident which happened to him here. A priest offered to show him the

uncorrupted body of a saint, and he showed Ampère a dried mummy in a

sarcophagus. But when Ampère looked at the inscription on the

sarcophagus he saw that the holy man here displayed was none other than

Landini.

We did not stay to see the wonderful relic.

[Illustration: CASTEL SAN NICCOLO]

The crispness of the air outside and the panorama of the hills had

greater attractions. The road above Borgo commanded a wide field of

view, and the eye was free to roam across the valley where the Arno

flowed fed by many streams, and to the heights around. The valley was

closed in by the Falterona, which is the highest mountain of this part

of the Apennines; it rises to an elevation of 5434 ft.

After an hour’s walk we deviated to Romena, where we spent some time in

the ancient church which flanks the hill. We greatly admired the old

column capitals, one of which bears the date 1152. Beni’s guide-book

says that the church also possesses an ancient bell, with the date 1186,

and the words “Mentem Sanctam Deo Placentem.”

From Romena we left the road and descended by a path to Pratovecchio, a

large rambling place, which seemed to have no special attraction. We

then pushed on to Stia, which lies at the confluence of the Arno and the

Staggia; above it rise the ruins of the castle of Porciano.

Stia is a picturesque city. Its market-place, set on rising ground, with

houses jutting out from both sides, suggested the arrangements of scene

decoration. Its ancient church is unattractive from outside, but

beautiful within. Stia is a convenient centre for walks, but we thought

badly of its _Albergo Alpina_, and would give the preference another

time to the inn at Pratovecchio, the situation of which is quite as

convenient. The Falterona is usually ascended from Stia, but the snow

that had recently fallen made the ascent impossible. We were even

prevented from penetrating to the fir woods which have been planted in

honour of Dante near the sources of the Arno, a spot to which the

expression “Capo d’Arno” is now currently applied. Our walks were

limited to the valleys and the lower heights, but we thereby saw more of

the people than we should have done otherwise. They were courteous and

friendly and charmed us by their unaffected ways. In Dante’s ears the

speech of the inhabitants of the Casentino sounded harsh and ugly; to us

their Italian seemed correct and clear, and we were struck more than

once by their conversational ease.

With pleasure we recalled a homestead on the road to San Godenzo, in

which seemed to linger that unaffected rusticity of classic times which

the Georgics of Virgil have preserved for us. We were sheltering from a

shower in an outhouse when the woman of the farm came out and invited us

in. We entered a long low room with a window at each end, the further

one looking out into the distance of the hills. The room seemed dark at

first, but as one’s power of vision readjusted itself to the mellow

light, the wide hearth stood forth with its glowing embers with the

children hanging round. Earthenware pots and plates shone bright from

shelves against the wall; and the board and the benches, all rounded and

polished with use, also caught the reflection from the glow. One of the

children threw on some crackling sticks; two others, dark-haired and

red-cheeked, came and clung about their mother. Rickety chairs were

placed for us near the hearth, then the woman resumed her low seat and

went on winding her yarn. In her rough homespun, with her little ones

about her, she looked a picture of health and vigour. She readily talked

of her home and the children’s varying ways, and of the mill at Stia to

which she was sending the yarn which she had spun. Presently the husband

too came in, a figure such as one associates with the hills, tall and

well-made. He began cleaning his gun, and with the same friendliness

talked of the hares he had shot, and of the sport still in store for

him. They seemed a happy family, making us welcome with the simple

dignity which is so marked a feature in the Italian peasant, and

speeding us on our way with the wish that for our sake the weather might

improve.

Yet another interior remains with me, the workshop of a cobbler below

Porciano. Here a number of houses stood huddled together against the

slope of the hill. The word _vino_, roughly painted in red on a wall

that faced the road at an angle, attracted our attention, for we were

thirsty, as one often is in a country where one feels suspicious of the

water, and we entered. The hale, white-haired cobbler rose from his

stool and motioned us to a seat with a certain formality. He then

reached two glasses and a huge straw-covered flagon from the shelf, drew

out the bit of tow that closed its mouth, and flicked on the floor the

drops of oil that floated on the wine, and a little of the wine itself.

Here was a reasonable basis for the offer of a libation! Then he filled

our glasses, and resuming his work spoke of a son in America, and of the

love of change and the growing desire for travel in the younger

generation. We too were travelling: whence had we come, whither were we

bound? His caustic aptness of speech recalled the saying that the smell

of leather sharpens a man’s wits. We had been puzzled that day by a

roadside shrine dedicated to a saint Mona Giovanna, and I asked about

her, hazarding the remark that his trade was known to go with love of

reading. He seemed pleased, and pointing to a small store of books he

said he could oblige us, and drew forth the story of the saint in the

cheap form in which these stories circulate among the peasantry. In

this case it was the question of a woman whose claim to holiness the

folk endorsed, while the clergy refused to accept it. Finally the bells

at Stia tolled of their own accord as she entered the town, and the

candle she was carrying to the shrine was miraculously set alight. In

the pantheon of the saints Giovanna has found a place in connection with

Bagno on the further side of the hills, but the cobbler was sure about

the miracle happening at Stia, and the book confirmed his belief.

This was one of several occasions on which I engaged in conversation

with the people on their local saints. Many of the stories which have

been worked into legends, and now go to swell the bulk of the _Acta

Sanctorum_, are fresh in the mind of the folk, and a question or two

draws from them an account of most wondrous wonders which happened in

these districts. The incidents are related in sober earnest, but

sometimes the narrator ends with a smile and a shrug of the shoulders.

“This is what they say, as to when it happened, _chi lo sa?_” The chief

saint of the district, of whom many wonders are told, is St Torello, the

saint of Poppi, whose image faces that of the abbot Fedele of Strumi in

the chief church of the place. The wonders worked by Torello chiefly

refer to wolves, his power over them was such, that he succeeded in

taming one and turning him practically into a dog. In our British Isles

the wonder of taming the wolf and setting him to guard the sheep, “which

he does to this present day,” is attributed to the woman saint Modwen

who came into England from Ireland. Torello seems to have been content

to have the wolf as his companion, and those who called upon him against

wolves henceforth found protection. The learned editors of the _Acta

Sanctorum_ suggested that Torello lived in the eleventh century, but his

legend, as it was put into writing by an inhabitant of Poppi, contains

lingering pre-Christian superstitions. The great wolf locally called

“Moninus,” whom he put under a ban, seems to be unknown except in this

district. Torello is also called upon by the people to protect them

against famine and the plague.

The driving road over the Consuma to Florence is a well planned road,

which rises to a height of 3435 ft. On the day when we crossed the

mountains the weather gave a peculiar grandeur to the wildness of the

surroundings. We joined the road above Romena and cast a farewell look

back on the Casentino. It stretched away in a sunny morning haze, with

the hills of Poppi and Bibbiena just visible, and the heights of La

Verna overshadowed by clouds. The road went steadily rising through

scenery which became more and more bleak and desolate. We passed

Casaccia, a solitary inn, since turned into a private house, and

appropriated to some society. After passing Casaccia the road wound in

and out at about the same height till a gap in the hills was reached,

down which one looked down into the valley of the Solano; the old path

here joined the new road. In this valley a storm was brewing. Clouds

came rolling up, but they could not prevail against the strong wind

which blew from the pass. It was grand to see the masses of blue and

purple and black, rolled back on each other in the valley, more and more

densely packed. Every now and then a streak of cloud escaped and ran

under shelter of a rock till it met the wind, which seized it and

scattered it and dashed it towards us in the form of blinding snow. On

the further side of the pass the weather was settled and fine. The sun

shone clear and a blue sky spanned the distant view towards the

Mediterranean. This view was limited in the north only by the distant

mountains of Carrara; in the south it embraced Florence and all the

hills around it, spreading away to the flatness of the distant coast.

And in the glow of the late afternoon sun we once more caught sight of

the Arno in the near distance. We had left it a rushing mountain stream

at Stia; we now beheld it again a broad, shining river, flowing beneath

the city of Florence.

[Illustration]

HINTS FOR THE TRAVELLER

The Casentino is reached from Florence.

--by rail _via_ Arezzo (55 miles, 6 trains daily, in 1½-4 hours) and

Bibbiena (20 miles, 3 trains daily, in 1½ hours). The railway goes on to

Poppi, Pratovecchio and Stia, the terminus of the line lying midway

between the two latter towns which are about a mile apart.

--or by rail to Pontassieve, _Albergo del Vapore_, _Locanda della

Stazione_, _Restaurant Piselli_, and from there by carriage road over

the Consuma Pass to Stia or Pratovecchio. A diligence starts daily from

Pontassieve for Stia at 2.30 in the afternoon (3 lire), and for

Pontassieve from Stia at 11 o’clock in the morning. At Pontassieve

carriages in the inns mentioned above. To Stia one-horse carriage, 12

lire; two-horse carriage, 24 lire. Carriages from Pontassieve to

Camaldoli, 25 lire and 40 lire.

--or by rail to St Ellero, the station beyond Pontassieve, and on by

steep grade line to Saltino (trains vary according to the season) and

Vallombrosa. At Saltino _Hotel Vallombrosa_, _Hotel Croce di Savoia_,

and ten minutes further _Hotel Castello di Acquabella_ (all large and

with modern comforts). From Saltino carriage road 1½ miles to

Vallombrosa, _Albergo della Foresta_, _Villino Medici_ (recommended).

From Vallombrosa a road ending in a footpath across the mountains

reaches the Consuma road near Consuma, about two hours’ walk.

* * * * *

Convenient centres for excursions are Bibbiena, _Albergo Amorosi_;

Poppi, _Restaurant and pension Gelati_, _Albergo Vezzosi_, near the

station; Pratovecchio, _Albergo Spigliantini_, _Albergo Bastieri_; Stia,

_Albergo della Stazione Alpina_, _Albergo Falterona_.

=Bibbiena= is situated on a hill fifteen minutes’ walk from the station,

fare 50 c. In the church of San Lorenzo are two _della Robbias_.

* * * * *

Excursions from Bibbiena.

--to La Verna (inn) by road, 7½ miles. Two-horse carriage from Bibbiena,

15-20 lire. The monastery, which is visible from afar, consists of

several parts which date from different periods. The road on leaving

Bibbiena passes the interesting Dominican monastery Madonna del Sasso,

founded in 1347, and enlarged in 1486. It then passes Campi, crosses the

Corsalone and ascends through a wood and along rocky slopes. Outside the

monastery lies the Cappella degli Uccelli, where flocks of birds

welcomed St Francis on his first visit. The oldest part is the Cappella

degli Angeli, built in 1216. This contains three _della Robbias_. The

large church was begun in 1348 by Tarlato, Count of Pietramala. This

contains several _della Robbias_. The small church of the Stigmata was

built in 1263 by Count Simone of Battifolle, as is indicated by a

well-cut inscription at the entrance. It contains a very fine _della

Robbia_. Below this chapel is the Sasso Spicco, whence the devil hurled

St Francis, and the cave, called St Francis’s Bed, whence a raven used

to call him every night to matins. In the Luoghi Santi, St Francis

frequently stayed. A path leads to the chapel, three-quarters of an hour

above the convent, from which there is an extensive view, and beyond

ascends the Penna. Below lies Chiusi di Casentino, formerly looked upon

as _Clusium Novum_, mentioned by Pliny. Here Ludovico Buonarotti was

_podestà_ at the time when his son Michel Angelo was born at Caprera, a

short distance to the south-east.

--to Ortignano, an hour’s drive along the valley of the Teggina. A

beautiful view of Bibbiena looking back. A paved path leads from the

road up to Ortignano, and beyond to the church, which contains a

beautiful Virgin and Child by _Matteo di Giovanni_. Along the road

beyond Ortignano lies Raggiolo (inn), with the ruins of a castle which

was held by the Ubertini (1325), and passed from them to the Tarlati.

From Raggiolo the Prato Magno is sometimes ascended, about two and a

half hours’ walk, guide necessary.

--to Badia a Prataglia, a rising summer resort, _Albergo Mulinacci_, and

at Boscoverde, 2700 ft., a summer pension, 10 miles. Diligence from

Bibbiena, 2 lire; one-horse carriage, 8 lire. The road follows the

valley of the Archiano and passes Camprena. The ruins of Gressa

(formerly of the bishops of Arezzo and taken by the Florentines in 1259)

and of Marciano (granted to Badia a Prataglia in 1084) are visible on

the right. At Partina are ruins of a castle held by the Guidi till 1389.

Serravalle, with its tower of 1188, is visible on the left. A driving

road leading up to it from beyond the bridge is in course of

construction, and several new villas have been built near the old

village. The Archiano is here joined by the Fosso of Camaldoli. A path

this side of the bridge leads along the valley to Camaldoli. Another

path further up over the hills also leads through the woods to

Camaldoli. Badia a Prataglia, founded about the year 980, was associated

with Camaldoli in the twelfth century, and for a time suppressed. The

church has an interesting crypt with romanesque columns, now used as a

wood store. The old monastery adjoining the church is now a private

villa. Beyond Badia the road ascends, and from the height of the pass

Bagno in Romagna is visible. From Badia to Bagno 10, to Forli 58 miles.

Interesting short walks to the confluence of the Arno and Archiano, and

to Memmenano, where is a fine _della Robbia_.

* * * * *

=Poppi= lies on a hill, fifteen minutes’ walk from the station. The castle

is being restored. It is the work of Jacopo Lapo. On the top of the

staircase Count Guido of Battifolle. The chapel contains frescoes

attributed to Spinello Aretino and Jacopo da Casentino, and other fresco

decorations have been uncovered in the dining hall. In the church of the

Augustinians a poor _della Robbia_. Another _della Robbia_ outside the

Casa Bremasole. The parochial church, beautifully situated, contains

several good paintings, including a Virgin of Franciabigio, others

attributed to Guido da Siena, and the head of St Torello, the patron

saint of the district, in silver gilt casing.

Excursions from Poppi.

--to Camaldoli by road 8 miles. One-horse carriage, 7-10 lire. In summer

months a diligence. The older bad road is by Lierna, the new one leaves

Ragginopoli to the right. Both contain ruins of strongholds owned by the

Guidi. The monastery of Camaldoli lies in a wooded valley on a rocky

slope of the Apennines. A few of the more aged and infirm monks remain

here, but the greater part of the monastery is turned into a hotel,

_Grande Albergo_, with every comfort. The monastery founded by St

Romuald in 1018 was destroyed by fire in 1203, but the old convent court

remains unchanged. It owned an early printing press, and the famous

_Annali Camaldolensi_, 907-1764, were written here. The church, which

was injured in 1498 when the monastery was besieged by the Duke of

Urbino, was rebuilt in 1523, and contains three paintings by Vasari. It

was restored 1772-1776. The monastery was suppressed in 1866 and belongs

to the Woods and Forest Department of the State. The majority of the

monks have retired to the hermitage. This lies three-quarters of an hour

up the glen above the convent, along a paved path, at a height of 3700

ft. Visitors are shown over the church and the cell of St Romuald by one

of the monks. Beyond the hermitage a path leads to the Prato al Soglio,

fine and extensive view, and across the hills to Badia a Prataglia. In

the opposite direction a footpath to Lonnano and Poppiena. Fine walk

along the ridge to Monte Falterona.

--to Fronzola, with the remains of a castle besieged by Count Simone of

Battifolle in 1344. The road leads on to Raggiolo.

--to Borgo alla Collina and Strada San Niccolo (inn). The road follows

the valley and crosses Campaldino, the site of the famous battle. At

Certomondo there is a church and cloister of the fifteenth century. Near

here were found Etruscan remains in 1846. The road to the Consuma Pass

diverges to the left. Borgo alla Collina (inn), six miles from Poppi,

has an old church containing a Virgin and saints of 1423. The new church

contains the body of Cristofero Landini, Chancellor of the Republic of

Florence. From the road extensive views of the valley. To the left a

road leads to Strada. Interesting church of San Martino in Vado with

many curious column capitals, similar in style to those of Romena and

Stia. On the further side of the river lies the ruined Castel S.

Niccolo, one of the great strongholds of the Guidi, with church, also in

ruins. A road diverges to the right to Cajano. Of the Castle of

Battifolle only a few stones are left. From Cajano the paved road in a

steep ascent reaches the high road between Casaccia and Consuma. From

Strada the road along the Scheggia ends in a path by which it is

possible to reach Montemignajo, a stronghold of the Guidi, of which the

tower, a vast cistern, and part of the walls are left. In the church of

Santa Maria, are column capitals, similar in style to those of Romena,

etc. To reach Montemignajo driving, it is necessary to drive almost to

the height of the pass between Casaccia and Consuma, branching off to

the left. From Montemignajo a rough path leads to the Croce Vecchia and

on to Vallombrosa.

--to Pratovecchio (6 miles) the road follows the valley of the Arno. The

place, large and rambling, is closely connected with the history of the

Guidi. There are extant the ruins of towers and remains of the ancient

walls and fortifications. The convent church of the Dominican nuns

contains several seventeenth century paintings. From Pratovecchio three

different paths, the one _via_ Lonnano, the other _via_ Casalino, the

third _via_ Moggiona, lead to Camaldoli.

* * * * *

=Stia= lies on the confluence of the Staggia and the Arno. The church (La

Pieve) is of the twelfth century, partly modernised, but contains

interesting round arches and carved column capitals. It is said to have

been built by Countess Matelda. In the church several _della Robbias_.

In the town hall a beautiful _della Robbia_. Also in the _Oratorio della

Madonna del Ponte_ a polychrome _della Robbia_. In the bed of a small

lake north-east of Stia, during the drought of 1838, were discovered

many Etruscan antiquities.

Excursions from Stia and Pratovecchio.

--to Monte Falterona (5434 ft.) about four hours. Guide advisable (5

frs.). The usual way is by Porciano, an ancient stronghold of the Guidi.

From here following the path in a northerly direction to the Capo

d’Arno, from where by a steep ascent to the refuge _Ricovero Dante_

built by the Italian Alpine Club. (The key procurable at the house of

Signor Beni at Stia, or of the Secretary of the Club at Florence.) In

the club hut only bare bedsteads. On a clear day the view extends to the

Adriatic and the Tyrrhenian. From Falterona a splendid walk along the

mountain ridge to Camaldoli.

--to Santa Maria delle Grazie, at one time a dependency of Vallombrosa,

sometimes called Vallombrosella. The church, beautifully situated, dates

from the end of fifteenth century. Some good pictures and several

beautiful _della Robbias_. The ruins of Castel Castagnajo, and of Campo

Lombardo, strongholds of the Guidi, are seen on the further side of the

river. A path leads on to the mountain village Vallucciole. Another road

along the valley of the Staggia leads to Gaviserri branching off to the

left to Papiano, near which are the ruins of Urbech, a stronghold of the

Guidi.

--to the Castle and Church of Romena along the road which joins the main

road over the Consuma. The Castle ruins are in a commanding position and

are visible from afar. The site in 1034 was in the power of Count Guido

Alberti of Spoleto, and passed into the family of the Guidi through

marriage. It passed to Florence in 1357. An inscription records Dante’s

stay here during his exile. Half a mile below lie the ruins of the

church, built in 1152, as mentioned on one of the column capitals. The

road passes Fonte Branda. The church, which contains some good

paintings, has been restored. Beyond Romena the road returns to the main

road which rises to Omo Morto, a heap of stones that is popularly

associated with Maestro Adamo of Brescia, and beyond to Casaccia and the

pass over the Consuma.

INDEX

Adamo of Brescia, 118, 141.

Ampère, _Voyages dantesques_, 11, 122.

Apennines, 57, 77 ff.

Archiano, 57, 78, 109, 136.

Arezzo, trains from, 133.

Arno, valley of the, 1;

sources of, 113 ff.

Arnolfo Lapo, 110.

Badia a Prataglia, 10, 85, 87;

inns at and situation, 136.

Badia a Tega, 10.

Bagno, 56, 68, 136.

Battifolle, 90;

ruins of, 139.

Beni, guide book of, 49, 125;

address of, 141.

Bibbiena, 2, 13 ff.;

market-place, 14;

inns at and excursions from, 134.

Bibbiena, Cardinal, 13, 17, 21 ff.

Borgo alla Collina, 122;

situation of, 138.

Boscoverde, pension at, 136.

Buonconte, killed at Campaldino, 114, 117.

Cajano, 139.

_Calandra_, 26 ff.

Camaldoli, 2, 51 ff.;

views of, 53, 73;

landmark of, 76;

approaches of, 133, 136;

inns at and excursions from, 137;

paths to, 140.

Campaldino, 114, 120, 138.

Campi, 134.

Campo Lombardo, 141.

Camprena, 55.

Capo d’Arno, 113 ff.;

paths to, 140.

Cappella degli Uccelli, 134.

Caprera, 135.

Casaccia, 131, 139.

Casalino, 140.

Castel Castagnajo, 141.

Castel San Niccolo, 139;

view of, 123.

Castiglione on Cardinal Bibbiena, 22 ff.

Certomondo, 139.

Chiusi di Casentino, 135.

Consuma, 107, 121, etc.;

driving road over, 133;

paths leading to, 134, 139, 141.

_Conversations of Camaldoli_, 80 ff.

Corsalone, 35, 134.

_Cortegiano, il_, 24 ff.

Dante, on the Guidi, 7;

connection with the Guidi, 93, 113 ff.;

on St Francis, 44;

on St Romuald, 10.

Della Robbia, at Bibbiena, 17, 134;

at La Verna (frontispiece), 46, 49, 134;

at Memmenano, 137;

at Poppi, 137;

at Santa Maria, 141;

at Stia, 140.

Divizio, Angelo, 32;

Bernardo, _see_ Bibbiena, Cardinal.

Eremo, 63, 78 ff., 138.

Etruscan remains, 2, 18, 139.

Faenza at war with Guidi, 105.

Falterona, 1, 113, 125;

ascent of, 140.

Fedele of Strumi, 129.

Florence at war with Guidi, 105.

Fonte Branda, 63, 142.

Forli, road to, 101, 137.

Fosso of Camaldoli, 78, 136.

Francis, St, 5, 10, 11, 33 ff.;

portrait of (frontispiece).

Fronzola, 138.

Gaviserri, 141.

Gherardesca, Countess, 116, 117.

Giovio on Cardinal Bibbiena, 22, 29.

Gisla, Countess, 94.

Gressa, 55, 136.

Gualdrada, Countess, 95, 104 ff.

Guidi, Counts, 90 ff.;

Guido, 95;

Guido _il Marchese_, 97, 102;

Guidoguerra, 98, 101;

Guido Vecchio, 104, 106;

Guido Magnifico, 106;

Guido Novello, 106 ff.;

Guido Selvatico, 113;

Guido of Battifolle, 115,

his portrait, 109;

Guido Novello the younger, 115;

Tegrimo, 94;

Tegrimo Bevisangue, 94;

Tegrimo of Modigliana, 107;

Simone of Battifolle, 48, 106, 135;

Alessandro of Romena, 117 ff.;

Oberto and Guido of Romena, 118;

arms of, 112.

Jacopo del Casentino, 46, 111, 137.

Jacopo Lapo, 110, 137.

Landini, Cristofero, 11, 80 ff.;

relic of, 139.

La Verna, 5, 11, 33 ff.;

views of, 3, 34, 43;

description of, 134.

Lierna, 137.

Lonnano, 138, 140.

Maccia del Uomo Morto, 118.

Madonna del Sasso, 35, 134.

Maldolo, Count, 71.

Malespini on Guidi, 95.

Manessa, Countess, 114, 117.

Marciano, 55, 136.

Mariotto, 82.

Matelda, Countess, 96, 97, 140.

Medici in the Casentino, 21, 81 ff.;

princess at Eremo, 77.

Memmenano, 137.

Moggiona, 140.

Mona Giovanna, 128.

Montemignajo, 97, 139.

Orlando, Count, 46.

Ortignano, 135.

Otto of Freysing on Guidi, 101.

Ozanam on St Francis, 40, 41.

Pappiano, 141.

Passerini on Guidi, 119.

Penna, 33, 50;

ascent of, 135.

Peter Damian, 64, 65.

Pontassieve, inns at, 133.

Poppi, 75, 89, 90 ff.;

views of, 91, 99, 109;

inns at, 134;

excursions from, 137.

Poppiena, 138.

Porciano, 90, 95, etc.

Prato al Soglio, 85, 138.

Pratomagno, 18, 76;

ascent of, 135.

Pratovecchio, 46, 113, 125;

inns at, 134;

excursions from, 140.

Ragginopoli, 136.

Raggiolo, 135, 138.

Romena, 90, 97, 98;

view of, 114;

ways to, 141.

Romuald, St, 5, 10, 51 ff., 80, etc.

Ruskin on St Francis, 39, 41.

Sacchetti on Countesses at Poppi, 117.

Saltino, hotels at, 133.

San Martino di Vado, 97, 139.

Santa Maria delle Grazie, 141.

Sasso Spicco, 135.

Scheggia, 139.

Serravalle, 59, 85, 89, 136.

Soci, 55, 56, 57, 90.

Solano, 97, 121.

Staggia, 125, 141.

Stia, 97, 125, 133;

inns at, 134;

excursions from, 140.

Strava San Niccolo, 121;

situation of, 138.

Strumi, 94, 129.

Tarlati, 20, 22;

of Pietramala, 56.

Teggina, 135.

Tolosanus on Guidi, 101.

Torello, St, 129 ff., 137.

Urbech, 141.

Vallombrosa, inns at, 134.

Vallucciole, 141.

Vasari, 46, 89, 90, 110, 138.

Villani, 95, 109, 116.

THE END

_Colston & Coy., Limited, Printers, Edinburgh_

[Illustration: Map of Casentino]

* * * * *

A LIST OF DENT’S

COUNTY GUIDES

EDITED BY GEORGE A. B. DEWAR.

In issuing this series of books the publishers believe that they are

making a departure, no less welcome than needful, from the usual lines

on which such Handbooks are compiled. What they have endeavoured to do

for the historic Towns of Europe in their “Mediæval Town Series,” they

now hope to accomplish for the Counties of England, by presenting their

unrivalled attractions in such a way as shall no longer make a

guide-book a weariness to the flesh.

Their object is to produce a series of books at once thoroughly readable

and thoroughly efficient as tourist guides.

The volumes will be redolent of the fresh open air and the country side.

Natural History and Sport in their various branches will be in the hands

of experts living in the districts described. The Scenery and History of

each interesting spot will be written of by a man of letters who knows

and loves his own county.

Each volume is divided into three parts. PART I., dealing with the

“Story and Scenery” of the county, consists of Itineraries devoted to

its characteristic districts; and it is intended that these sections,

though independent of each other, may form a connected whole fit to be

read through as are the chapters of a book. To make the “Story and

Scenery” of the county readable as a whole, it has been necessary to

condense into PART III. “A County Gazetteer,” much antiquarian and other

information about towns, villages, and churches, together with

indispensable directions of a purely practical character about trains,

hotels and inns, and the like. PART II. consists of articles on the

Natural History and Sport of the county, contributed by writers who have

studied these subjects on the spot, together with a chapter specially

intended for the use of cyclists.

* * * * *

LIST OF VOLUMES

_Each with numerous Topographical Illustrations, Sectional Plans

accompanying the Itineraries, and a County Map. Fcap. 8vo (convenient

for the pocket), cloth gilt, tinted edges, 4s. 6d. net per volume._

THE LAKE COUNTIES. By W. G. COLLINGWOOD, with Special Articles on:

Birds, by MARY L. ARMITT; Butterflies and Moths, by Canon CREWDSON;

Flora, by S. L. PETTY; Geology, by Prof. E. HULL, LL.D.;

Fox-hunting, by Rev. E. M. REYNOLDS, M.F.H.; Mountaineering, by W.

P. HASKETT SMITH; Yachting, by ARTHUR SEVERN; Angling, by A.

SEVERN, Junr.; Shooting, by A. RUSKIN SEVERN; Cycling, by A. W.

RUMNEY.

[_Spring, 1902._

SURREY. By WALTER JERROLD, with Special Articles on: Birds, by J.

A. BUCKNILL, M.A.; Flowers, by EDWARD STEP, F.L.S.; Entomology, by

Rev. J. VERNON; Geology, by Prof. EDWARD HULL, LL.D.; Cycling, by

DUNCAN TOVEY.

_Athenæum._--“He writes with ample knowledge and enthusiasm,

and the volume may be recommended as fully maintaining the high

reputation which the series has already gained.... Besides Mr.

Jerrold’s main narrative, which is strong on the antiquarian and

literary side, we have special articles ... which seem excellent.”

_Field._--“Something more than a guide book, though in that

direction it would be hard to beat, for while the author is an

enthusiast, and writes very pleasantly, he is far from unmindful

of those details which, though they may be commonplace, are very

valuable.”

NORFOLK. By WILLIAM A. DUTT, with Special Articles on: Birds, by

Rev. R. C. NIGHTINGALE; Botany, by H. D. GELDART; Entomology, by

CLAUDE MORLEY, F.E.S.; Geology, by F. W. HARMER, F.G.S.; Shooting

and Fishing, by A. J. RUDD; Sea Fishing, by E. A. CROXON; Cycling,

by H. MORRISS.

_Academy._--“As near a model guide book as may be; the itineraries

are ample and well arranged, the maps good, and he discourses

pleasantly by the way of matters interesting to more than the mere

tourist.”

_Daily Chronicle._--“This little volume is so excellent as far as

it goes, has been written with so much cheeriness and love for the

Eastern county, is such a miracle of cheapness, and so exactly what

the tourist in Norfolk needs during his stay, that we can only

speak of it with cordial praise and admiration.”

HAMPSHIRE WITH THE ISLE OF WIGHT.

By GEORGE A. B. DEWAR, with Special Articles on: Botany, by JOHN

VAUGHAN; Entomology, by G. M. A. HEWETT; Birds, by G. B. CORBIN;

Geology, by Prof. EDWARD HULL, LL.D.; Fishing and Shooting, by the

EDITOR; Cycling, by W. M. HARMAN.

_Athenæum._--“_After a wide and practical experience of guide-books

for nearly forty years, we have no hesitation in saying that it is

the best of its size (350 pp.) that we have as yet seen. It is a

book that the general antiquary or lover of Nature as well as the

country resident will delight to have on their shelves._”

_Times._--“The authors have done their work extremely well, ... an

immense amount of information presented in an orderly and

attractive form.”

_County Gentleman._--“At once practical and romantic, useful and

ornamental.”

* * * * *

PRESS APPRECIATIONS

_Outlook._--“Many will bless Messrs. Dent for the happy idea embodied in

this series.”

_Athenæum._--“This seems to us an excellent plan, and should produce a

kind of volume decidedly superior to the ordinary run of handbooks.”

_Daily News._--“There is no reason why a guide-book should not be

artistic and literary, as well as an accurate production, but before the

issue of ‘Dent’s County Guides,’ we are not aware that anybody ever

thought of making it so.”

_Daily Chronicle._--“We rejoice that the writing of guide-books has come

into the hands of men of fine taste, large appreciation, and delicate

style, and has for ever escaped from those who, in the past, gave

guide-books a reputation for all that was commonplace, banal, and dull.

Messrs. Dent are to be much commended.”

_Scottish Geographical Magazine._--“These guide-books may be said to

inaugurate a new departure. Instead of bare statistics, dry details, and

unattractive forms of ordinary guide-books, we have here dainty little

volumes with interesting letterpress, clear maps, and exquisite woodcuts

from original sketches.... No lover of the beautiful could have more

delightful companions.”

J. M. DENT & CO., BEDFORD STREET, LONDON, W.C.

Through the Casentino with Hints for the Traveller · 第 8 / 8 章