COUNTER’S CREEK DISTRICT.

Since the last report the sum assessed by the metropolitan board of works

upon this portion of the parish has been, for the year 1861, four hundred

and seventy-nine pounds, eleven shillings and eleven pence; but the

vestry have abstained from issuing their order to the board of guardians

for its collection. They have, however, in consequence of the receipt of

the following letter, upon the recommendation of the Finance Committee,

paid the amount for 1858:—

Metropolitan Board of Works,

1, Greek Street, Soho, W.,

17th October, 1860,

Dear Sir,—I am directed by the metropolitan board of works to

acquaint you that they have directed their attention to the subject

of the amounts outstanding on their precepts issued to the vestries

and district boards of the metropolis, and they desire me to apprize

you for the information of the vestry of Chelsea, that having been

unsuccessful in their attempt to carry a measure through Parliament

in the past session for conferring upon the board the necessary

powers to deal with the question of the redistribution of the

Counter’s Creek charges, they have had under consideration the

subject of the payment of the amount due from the vestry on the

precept for the ordinary expenses of the board for the year 1858,

being the sum of £447 4_s._ 2_d._ payment of which was, as you will

recollect, allowed to stand over until the re-apportionments of the

debts of the Commissioners of Sewers had been discussed in

Parliament. The board now feel that the time has arrived when it is

necessary that they should adopt measures for obtaining payments of

the amounts outstanding, and after an attentive consideration of the

facts of the case, and having regard to the arrangement with the

vestry in reference to the parish contributing to the cost of the

Counter’s Creek diversion sewer, the conclusion they have arrived at

as to the most convenient course to be adopted is, that the board

should proceed to appoint persons to make a rate on the parish in

default, for the amount due on the precept, and in the event of the

vestry continuing their objection to the payment, that some ratepayer

should then raise the question of the liability of the parish by an

appeal against the rate, on which a special case might be reserved

for the opinion of the Court of Queen’s Bench. I am directed to add

that the Board have deferred further proceedings in the matter for a

fortnight from the date of their last meeting, the 12th instant, in

order to afford the vestry an opportunity of paying the amount in

question should they think proper so to do; and meanwhile I am to

request that you will be good enough to lay this letter before the

vestry, and to favor me with a reply with the least possible delay.

I am, dear sir, yours faithfully, JOHN POLLARD, Clerk of the Board.

The amount assessed for 1859, four hundred and fifty-six pounds, nine

shillings and one penny, was paid by order of the board on the sixth

December, 1859, before any portion of it was received from the board of

guardians.

January, 1861, the metropolitan board were very pressing for payment of

the amount for 1860 (five hundred and eighteen pounds, nineteen

shillings, and one penny), threatening immediate proceedings if it were

not made before the 25th of that month; the vestry, however, appealed

through Mr Tite against this undue pressure, contrasting with it, the

treatment received by the vestry of Kensington, who were in arrear many,

if not all, of their instalments, and eventually the metropolitan board

consented to receive the amount of the precept for their ordinary

expenses of 1860 less this sum which was included in it. Thus it is that

the sums assessed for the first four years have been collected in the

district, and paid to the metropolitan board; but for the two last, 1860

and 1861, they have not been paid to the metropolitan board, nor have any

steps been taken to collect the money in the district.

Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1 · 第 16 / 142 题