Tomochichi, chief of the Chickasaws, said to Wesley, "I will go up and

speak to the wise men of the nation, and I hope they will hear. But we

would not be made Christians as the Spaniards make Christians; we would

be taught before we are baptised." He felt the want unconsciously

acknowledged by the King of Siam, spoken of by John Locke in his chapter

on Probability. A Dutch ambassador, when entertaining the king with the

peculiarities of Holland, amongst other things told the sovereign that

the water in Holland would sometimes in cold weather be so hard that men

walked upon it, and that it would bear an elephant if he were there. To

which the king replied, "Hitherto I have believed the strange things you

have told me, because I looked upon you as a sober, fair man, but now I

am sure you lie." But Tomochichi had an eye that saw the faults of the

colonists, if he did not understand their religion. When urged to listen

to the doctrines of Christianity he keenly replied, "Why, these are

Christians at Savannah! these are Christians at Frederica! Christian

much drunk! Christian beat men! Christian tell lies! Devil Christian! Me

no Christian!" This recalls the pathetic story of the West Indian

cazique, who, at the stake, refused life, temporal or eternal, at the

price of conversion, asking where he should go to live so happily. He

was told--in heaven; and then he at once refused, on the ground that the

whites would be there; and he had rather live anywhere, or nowhere, than

dwell with such people as he had found the white Christians to be.

Almost the first word, says Dr. Medhurst, uttered by a Chinese, when

anything is said concerning the excellence of Christianity, is, "Why do

Christians bring us opium, and bring it directly in defiance of our

laws? The vile drug has destroyed my son, has ruined my brother, and

well-nigh led me to beggar my wife and children. Surely those who

import such a deleterious substance, and injure me for the sake of gain,

cannot wish me well, or be in possession of a religion better than my

own. Go first and persuade your own countrymen to relinquish their

nefarious traffic; and give me a prescription to correct this vile

habit, and then I will listen to your exhortations on the subject of

Christianity!" Dr. Livingstone says he found a tribe of men in the

interior of Africa so pure and simple that they seemed to have no idea

of untruthfulness and dishonesty until they were brought into contact

with Asiatics and Europeans. Some of Dr. Kane's men, "while resting at

Kalutunah's tent, had appropriated certain fox-skins, boots, and

sledges, which their condition seemed to require. The Esquimaux

complained of the theft, and Dr. Kane, after a careful inquiry into the

case, decided in their favor. He gave each five needles, a file, and a

stick of wood, and knives and other extras to Kalutunah and Shanghu, and

after regaling them with a hearty supper, he returned the stolen goods,

and tried to make them believe that his people did not steal, but only

took the articles to save their lives! In imitation of this Arctic

morality the natives, on their departure, carried off a few knives and

forks, which they deemed as essential to their happiness as the

fox-dresses were to the white men."

Among the airy visions which had been generated in the teeming brain of

Coleridge, says a writer in The London Quarterly, was the project of

pantisocracy--a republic to be founded in the wilds of America, of which

the fundamental principles were an equality of rank and property, and

where all who composed it were to be under the perpetual dominion of

reason, virtue, and love. Southey was inflamed by it and converted.

Through it he saw a way out of all his troubles. There he would enjoy

the felicity of living in a pure democracy, where he could sit unelbowed

by kings and aristocrats. "You," he wrote to his brother Tom, "are

unpleasantly situated, so is my mother, so were we all till this grand

scheme of pantisocracy flashed upon our minds, and now all is perfectly

delightful." Coleridge, contented to have delivered a glowing

description of Utopia, did nothing further, and departed on a pedestrian

tour through Wales, where, as the ridiculous will sometimes mingle

itself with the sublime, he feared he had caught the itch from an

admiring democratical auditor at an inn, who insisted upon shaking hands

with him. Some time after, Southey, having tried his panacea upon a few

select pantisocratic friends, wrote, "There was a time when I believed

in the persuadability of man, and had the mania of man-mending.

Experience has taught me better. The ablest physician can do little in

the great lazar-house of society. He acts the wisest part who retires

from the contagion."

"Nature goes her own way," said Goethe, "and all that to us seems an

exception is really according to order." He quoted the saying of

Rousseau, that you cannot hinder an earthquake by building a city near a

burning mountain. Peter the Great, he said, repeated Amsterdam so dear

to his youth, in locating St. Petersburg at the mouth of the Neva. The

ground rises in the neighborhood, and the emperor could have had a city

quite free from all the trouble arising from overflow if he had but gone

a little higher up. An old shipmaster represented this to him, and

prophesied that the people would be drowned every seventy years. There

stood also an old tree, with various marks from times when the waters

had risen to a great height. But all was in vain; the emperor stood to

his whim, and had the tree cut down, that it might not be witness

against him! Sydney Smith said of a certain fanatical member of

Parliament, that "he was losing his head. When he brings forward his

Suckling Act, he will be considered as quite mad. No woman to be allowed

to suckle her own child without medical certificates. Three classes,

viz., free-sucklers, half-sucklers, and spoon-meat mothers. Mothers,

whose supply is uncertain, to suckle upon affidavit! How is it possible

that an act of Parliament can supply the place of nature and natural

affection?"

"There is in nature," said Goethe to Soret, "an accessible and an

inaccessible. Be careful to discriminate between the two, be

circumspect, and proceed with reverence." "The sight of a primitive

phenomenon," he said to Eckermann, "is generally not enough for people;

they think they must go still further; and are thus like children who,

after peeping into a mirror, turn it round directly to see what is on

the other side." "When one," said he on another occasion, "has looked

about him in the world long enough to see how the most judicious

enterprises frequently fail, and the most absurd have the good fortune

to succeed, he becomes disinclined to give any one advice. At bottom, he

who asks advice shows himself limited; he who gives it gives also proof

that he is presumptuous. If any one asks me for good advice, I say, I

will give it, but only on condition that you will promise not to take

it.... Much is said of aristocracy and democracy; but the whole affair

is simply this: in youth, when we either possess nothing, or know not

how to value the tranquil possession of anything, we are democrats; but

when we, in a long life, have come to possess something of our own, we

wish not only ourselves to be secure of it, but that our children and

grandchildren should be secure of inheriting it. Therefore, we always

lean to aristocracy in our old age, whatever were our opinions in

youth."

Lord Eldon said in his old age, "that, if he were to begin life again,

he would be damned but he would begin as agitator." "I am no more

ashamed of having been a republican," said Southey, "than I am of having

been a child." Barere, who said that "the tree of liberty cannot

flourish unless it is watered by the blood of kings and

aristocrats"--who proposed the famous decree for the annihilation of

Lyons--devoted a great part of his later life to declaiming on the

necessity of entirely abolishing capital punishments.

Elliott, the Corn-Law Rhymer, being asked, "What is a communist?"

answered, "One who has yearnings for equal division of unequal earnings.

Idler or bungler, he is willing to fork out his penny and pocket your

shilling."

"Sir," said Johnson, "your levelers wish to level down as far as

themselves; but they cannot bear leveling up to themselves. They would

all have some people under them; why not then have some people above

them?"

Margaret Fuller, speaking of the greatest of German poets, says, "He

believes more in man than men, effort than success, thought than action,

nature than providence. He does not insist on my believing with him."

"He who would help himself and others," says Emerson, "should not be a

subject of irregular and interrupted impulses of virtue, but a

continent, persisting, immovable person,--such as we have seen a few

scattered up and down in time for the blessing of the world; men who

have in the gravity of their nature a quality which answers to the

fly-wheel in a mill, which distributes the motion equally over all the

wheels, and hinders it from falling unequally and suddenly in

destructive shocks. It is better that joy should be spread over all the

day in the form of strength, than that it should be concentrated into

ecstasies, full of danger, and followed by reactions." "It only needs

that a just man should walk in our streets, to make it appear how

pitiful and inartificial a contrivance is our legislation. The man whose

part is taken, and who does not wait for society in anything, has a

power which society cannot choose but feel."

What a character was Sir Isaac Newton! He is described as modest,

candid, and affable, and without any of the eccentricities of genius,

suiting himself to every company, and speaking of himself and others in

such a manner that he was never even suspected of vanity. "But this,"

says Dr. Pemberton, "I immediately discovered in him, which at once both

surprised and charmed me. Neither his extreme great age, nor his

universal reputation, had rendered him stiff in opinion, or in any

degree elated." His modesty arose from the depth and extent of his

knowledge, which showed him what a small portion of nature he had been

able to examine, and how much remained to be explored in the same field

in which he had himself labored. In a letter to Leibnitz, 1675, he

observes, "I was so persecuted with discussions arising out of my theory

of light, that I blamed my own imprudence for parting with so

substantial a blessing as my quiet, to run after a shadow." Nearly a

year after his complaint to Leibnitz, he uses the following remarkable

expression in a communication to Oldenburg: "I see I have made myself a

slave to philosophy; but if I get free of Mr. Linus's business, I will

resolutely bid adieu to it eternally, excepting what I do for my private

satisfaction, or leave to come out after me; for I see a man must either

resolve to put out nothing new, or to become a slave to defend it." His

assistant and amanuensis for five years (Humphrey Newton) never heard

him laugh but once in all that time: "'Twas upon occasion of asking a

friend, to whom he had lent Euclid to read, what progress he had made in

that author, and how he liked him. He answered by desiring to know what

use and benefit in life that study would be to him. Upon which Sir Isaac

was very merry." He was once disordered with pains, at the stomach,

which confined him for some days to his bed, but which he bore with a

great deal of patience and magnanimity, seemingly indifferent either to

live or to die. "He seeing me," said his assistant, "much concerned at

his illness, bid me not trouble myself; 'For if I die,' said Sir Isaac,

'I shall leave you an estate,' which he then for the first time

mentioned." Says Bishop Atterbury, "In the whole air of his face and

make there was nothing of that penetrating sagacity which appears in his

compositions. He had something rather languid in his look and manner,

which did not raise any great expectations in those who did not know

him." When Pope expressed a wish for "some memoirs and character of

Newton, as a private man," he did "not doubt that his life and manners

would make as great a discovery of virtue and goodness and rectitude of

heart, as his works have done of penetration and the utmost stretch of

human knowledge." When Vigani told him "a loose story about a nun," he

gave up his acquaintance; and when Dr. Halley ventured to say anything

disrespectful to religion, he invariably checked him with the remark, "I

have studied these things,--you have not." When he was asked to take

snuff or tobacco, he declined, remarking "that he would make no

necessities to himself." Bishop Burnet said that he "valued him for

something still more valuable than all his philosophy,--for having the

whitest soul he ever knew."

Slowly and modestly the great in all things is developed. "Though the

mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small." Look at the

Netherlands. "Three great rivers--the Rhine, the Meuse, and the

Scheldt--had deposited their slime for ages among the dunes and

sand-banks heaved up by the ocean around their mouths. A delta was thus

formed, habitable at last for man. It was by nature a wide morass, in

which oozy islands and savage forests were interspersed among lagoons

and shallows; a district lying partly below the level of the ocean at

its higher tides, subject to constant overflow from the rivers, and to

frequent and terrible inundations by the sea. Here, within a half

submerged territory, a race of wretched ichthyophagi dwelt upon mounds,

which they had raised, like beavers, above the almost fluid soil. Here,

at a later day, the same race chained the tyrant Ocean and his mighty

streams into subserviency, forcing them to fertilize, to render

commodious, to cover with a beneficent net-work of veins and arteries,

and to bind by watery highways, with the farthest ends of the world, a

country disinherited by nature of its rights. A region outcast of ocean

and earth wrested at last from both domains their richest treasures. A

race engaged for generations in stubborn conflict with the angry

elements was unconsciously educating itself for its great struggle with

the still more savage despotism of man."

In the central part of a range of the Andes, at an elevation of about

seven thousand feet, on a bare slope, may be observed some snow-white

projecting columns. These are petrified trees, eleven being silicified,

and from thirty to forty converted into coarsely crystallized white

calcaraeous spar. They are abruptly broken off, the upright stumps

projecting a few feet above the ground. The trunks measured from three

to five feet each in circumference. They stood a little way apart from

each other, but the whole formed one group. The volcanic sandstone in

which the trees were imbedded, and from the lower part of which they

must have sprung, had accumulated in successive thin layers around their

trunks, and the stone yet retained the impression of the bark. "It

required," says the eminent scientific man who visited the spot in 1835,

"little geological practice to interpret the marvelous story which this

scene at once unfolded. I saw the spot where a cluster of fine trees

once reared their branches on the shores of the Atlantic, when that

ocean, now driven back seven hundred miles, came to the foot of the

Andes. I saw that they had sprung from a volcanic soil which had been

raised above the level of the sea, and that subsequently this dry land,

with its upright trees, had been let down into the depths of the ocean.

In these depths, the formerly dry land was covered by sedimentary beds,

and these again by enormous streams of submarine lava--one such mass

attaining the thickness of a thousand feet; and these deluges of molten

stone and aqueous deposits five times alternately had been spread out.

The ocean which received such thick masses must have been profoundly

deep; but again the subterranean forces exerted themselves, and I now

beheld the bed of that ocean, forming a chain of mountains more than

seven thousand feet in height. Nor had those antagonist forces been

dormant which are always at work, wearing down the surface of the land;

the great piles of strata had been intersected by many wide valleys, and

the trees, now changed into silex, were exposed projecting from the

volcanic soil, now changed into rocks, whence formerly, in a green and

budding state, they had raised their lofty heads."

"The world," said Goethe, "is not so framed that it can keep quiet; the

great are not so that they will not permit misuse of power; the masses

not so that, in hope of a gradual amelioration, they will keep tranquil

in an inferior condition. Could we perfect human nature, we might expect

perfection everywhere; but as it is, there will always be this wavering

hither and thither; one part must suffer while the other is at ease."

"It is with human things," says Froude, "as it is with the great

icebergs which drift southward out of the frozen seas. They swim two

thirds under water, and one third above; and so long as the equilibrium

is sustained you would think that they were as stable as the rocks. But

the sea water is warmer than the air. Hundreds of fathoms down, the

tepid current washes the base of the berg. Silently in those far deeps

the centre of gravity is changed; and then, in a moment, with one vast

roll, the enormous mass heaves over, and the crystal peaks which had

been glancing so proudly in the sunlight are buried in the ocean

forever." "The secret which you would fain keep, as soon as you go

abroad, lo! there is one standing on the door-step to tell you the

same." The revolution is all at once ripe, and the bottom is at the top

again. Nobody and everybody is responsible. "It is seldom," says John

Galt, in his life of Wolsey, "that any man can sway the current of

national affairs; but a wide and earnest system of action never fails to

produce results which resemble the preexpected effects of particular

designs." At the gorgeous coronation of Napoleon, some one asked the

republican general Augereau whether anything was wanting to the splendor

of the scene. "Nothing," replied Augereau, "but the presence of the

million of men who have died to do away with all this."

You remember the value, to the cause of civil liberty and Christianity,

of the accidental epithet of "beggars," applied to the three hundred

nobles who petitioned Margaret of Parma for a stay of the edicts of

Philip and the Inquisition, about to be terribly executed upon the

rebellious Protestants under the leadership of William of Orange.

Motley, in his Dutch Republic, gives a vivid account of it. The duchess

was agitated and irritated by the petition. "The Prince of Orange

addressed a few words to the duchess, with the view of calming her

irritation. He observed that the confederates were no seditious rebels,

but loyal gentlemen, well-born, well-connected, and of honorable

character. They had been influenced, he said, by an honest desire to

save their country from impending danger,--not by avarice or ambition.

'What, madam,' cried Berlaymont in a passion, 'is it possible that your

highness can entertain fears of these beggars? Is it not obvious what

manner of men they are? They have not had wisdom enough to manage their

own estates, and are they now to teach the king and your highness how to

govern the country? By the living God, if my advice were taken, their

petition should have a cudgel for a commentary, and we would make them

go down the steps of the palace a great deal faster than they mounted

them!' Afterward, as the three hundred gentlemen and nobles passed by

the house of Berlaymont, that nobleman, standing at his window in

company with Count Aremberg, repeated his jest: 'There go our fine

beggars again. Look, I pray you, with what bravado they are passing

before us!' 'They call us beggars,' said Brederode to the three hundred

banqueting with him in the Calemburg mansion on that famous April night.

'Let us accept the name. We will contend with the Inquisition, but

remain loyal to the king, even till compelled to wear the beggar's

sack.' He then beckoned to one of his pages, who brought him a leathern

wallet, such as was worn at that day by professional mendicants,

together with a large wooden bowl, which also formed part of their

regular appurtenances. Brederode immediately hung the wallet around his

neck, filled the bowl with wine, lifted it with both hands, and drained

it at a draught. 'Long live the beggars!' he cried, as he wiped his

beard and set the bowl down. 'Long live the beggars!' Then for the first

time from the lips of those reckless nobles rose the famous cry, which

was so often to ring over land and sea, amid blazing cities, on

blood-stained decks, through the smoke and carnage of many a stricken

field. The humor of Brederode was hailed with deafening shouts of

applause. The count then threw the wallet round the neck of his nearest

neighbor, and handed him the wooden bowl. Each guest, in turn, donned

the mendicant's knapsack. Pushing aside his golden goblet, each filled

the beggar's bowl to the brim, and drained it to the beggars' health.

Roars of laughter and shouts of 'Long live the beggars!' shook the walls

of the stately mansion, as they were doomed never to shake again. The

shibboleth was invented. The conjuration which they had been anxiously

seeking was found. Their enemies had provided them with a spell which

was to prove, in after days, potent enough to start a spirit from palace

or hovel, forest or wave, as the deeds of the 'wild beggars,' the 'wood

beggars,' and the 'beggars of the sea' taught Philip at last to

understand the nation which he had driven to madness."

Johnny Appleseed, by which name Jonathan Chapman was known in every

log-cabin from the Ohio River to the Northern Lakes, is an interesting

character to remember. Barefooted, and with scanty clothing, he

traversed the wilderness for many years, planting appleseeds in the most

favorable situations. His self sacrificing life made him a favorite with

the frontier settlers--men, women, and especially children; even the

savages treated him with kindness, and the rattlesnakes, it was said,

hesitated to bite him. "During the war of 1812, when the frontier

settlers were tortured and slaughtered by the savage allies of Great

Britain, Johnny Appleseed continued his wanderings, and was never harmed

by the roving bands of hostile Indians. On many occasions the impunity

with which he ranged the country enabled him to give the settlers

warning of approaching danger, in time to allow them to take refuge in

their block-houses before the savages could attack them. An informant

refers to one of these instances, when the news of Hull's surrender came

like a thunderbolt upon the frontier. Large bands of Indians and British

were destroying everything before them, and murdering defenseless women

and children, and even the block-houses were not always a sufficient

protection. At this time Johnny traveled day and night, warning the

people of the impending danger. He visited every cabin and delivered

this message: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, and He hath anointed

me to blow the trumpet in the wilderness, and sound an alarm in the

forest; for behold, the tribes of the heathen are round about your

doors, and a devouring flame followeth after them!' The aged man who

narrated this incident said that he could feel even then the thrill that

was caused by this prophetic announcement of the wild-looking herald of

danger, who aroused the family on a bright moonlight midnight with his

piercing cry. Refusing all offers of food, and denying himself a

moment's rest, he traversed the border day and night until he had warned

every settler of the impending peril. Johnny also served as colporteur,

systematically leaving with the settlers chapters of certain religious

books, and calling for them afterward; and was the first to engage in

the work of protecting dumb brutes. He believed it to be a sin to kill

any creature for food. No Brahman could be more concerned for the

preservation of insect life, and the only occasion on which he destroyed

a venomous reptile was a source of long regret, to which he could never

refer without manifesting sadness. He had selected a suitable place for

planting appleseeds on a small prairie, and in order to prepare the

ground, he was mowing the long grass, when he was bitten by a

rattlesnake. In describing the event he sighed heavily, and said, 'Poor

fellow, he only just touched me, when I, in the heat of my ungodly

passion, put the heel of my scythe in him, and went away. Some time

afterward I went back, and there lay the poor fellow, dead!'" "He was a

man, after all,"--Hawthorne might have exclaimed of him, too,--"his

Maker's own truest image, a philanthropic man!--not that steel engine of

the devil's contrivance--a philanthropist!"

Library Notes · 第 8 / 32 段