Man, poor fellow, would be a curious object for microscopic study. If it

were possible to view him through powerful glasses, what humiliating

resemblances and infirmities would be discovered. He would be found to

have innumerable tentacula and appendages, for protection and warning,

and especially to possess unconceived of apparatus for making his way in

the dark,--necessities to him, it would appear, when further inspection

of the creature had shown him to be--blind. At last, he finds himself

obliged to rely upon such qualities and faculties as take the place of

powers and eyes. Cowardly, he is gregarious, and will not live alone;

weak, he consorts with weakness, to acquire strength; ignorant, he

contributes the least bit to the common stock of intelligence, and

escapes responsibility. One of many, he has the protection of the mob;

embodying others' weaknesses, he is strong in the bundle of sticks;

joining his voice with the million, it is lost in the confusion of

tongues. Attacked, he is fortified by his society; down, he will rise

again with his fellows; stupid with the rest, his shame is unfelt by

being diffused. In any extremity, there is safety in counsel; in the

ranks, he cannot run; in the crowd, it were vain to think. Weary of

stagnation or tired by the eddies, he goes with the current; unable to

stand an individual, he joins with a party; a poor creature of God, he

is afraid to trust Him on his Word, and flies to a sect with a creed for

protection. In the wake of thought, he may be thoughtless; voting the

ticket, he is a patriot; a stiff bigot, there can be no doubt about his

religion. He submits to be thought for as a child; to be cared for as an

invalid; to be subordinated as an idiot. Unequal to a scheme of his own,

he falls into one already devised for him; without independent views, he

relies upon his newspaper; without implicit trust in God, he leans upon

a broken reed in preference. Thus his business, his politics, his

religion, are defined for him, and are of easy reference; indeed it may

be said he knows them by heart, so little there is of them. Of the laws

of trade, political economy, essential Christianity, he may be as

ignorant as a barbarian, at the same time be complacent and respectable

in his ignorance. Acting for himself, he would be set down as eccentric

by his banker; thinking for himself, he would be thought to be too

uncertain to be trustworthy; living virtuously, walking humbly, and

trusting his Creator to take care of his creature, he would be an object

of suspicion, even if he escaped being called an infidel. His tailor

determines the cut of his coat; the street defines his manners and

morals; custom becomes his law, and compliance his gospel.

Addison, in The Spectator, gives an account of a gentleman who

determined to live and dress according to the rules of common sense, and

was shut up in a lunatic asylum in consequence. "Custom," says Carlyle,

"doth make dotards of us all. Philosophy complains that custom has

hoodwinked us from the first; that we do everything by custom, even

believe by it; that our very axioms, let us boast of free-thinking as we

may, are oftenest simply such beliefs as we have never heard

questioned." "In this great society wide lying around us," says Emerson,

"a critical analysis would find very few spontaneous actions. It is

almost all custom and gross sense." We play our parts so faithfully, not

to say conscientiously, that often we have difficulty in placing

ourselves, whether with the assumed or the natural. The little arts and

artifices we thrive by, become essentially a part of us; and in the

jostle and conflict--the greater to devour the lesser and the lesser the

least--we seem impelled to pursue the objects and ends which long habit

has somehow convinced us nature particularly suited us to pursue. When

an event occurs to attract attention to our follies or baseness, it has

not the effect to prompt repentance, but to excite our cunning, and set

us to work to find excuses, or to imagine some other course of conduct

which would have been more foolish or mischievous. "We keep on deceiving

ourselves in regard to our faults, until we, at last, come to look upon

them as virtues." Like Selwyn, the accomplished courtier and wit in the

time of George III., we get to think even our vices necessities. After a

night of elegant rioting and debauch, he tumbled out of his bed at noon

the next day, and reeling with both hands upon his head to a mirror in

his apartment, gazed at himself and soliloquized: "I look and feel most

villainously mean; but it's life--hang it, it's life!"

Lord Bacon, discoursing upon the "politic knowledge of ourselves," and

the "wisdom of business," in the Second Book of the Proficience and

Advancement of Learning, says: "The covering of defects is of no less

importance than the valuing of good parts; which may be done in three

manners, by caution, by color, and by confidence. Caution is when men do

ingeniously and discreetly avoid to be put into those things for which

they are not proper: whereas, contrariwise, bold and unquiet spirits

will thrust themselves into matters without difference, and so publish

and proclaim all their wants. Color is, when men make a way for

themselves, to have a construction made of their faults and wants, as

proceeding from a better cause, or intended for some other purpose: for

of the one it is well said, 'Vice often lurks in the likeness of

virtue,' and therefore whatsoever want a man hath, he must see that he

pretend the virtue that shadoweth it; as if he be dull, he must affect

gravity; if a coward, mildness; and so the rest: for the second, a man

must frame some probable cause why he should not do his best, and why he

should dissemble his abilities; and for that purpose must use to

dissemble those abilities which are notorious in him, to give color that

his true wants are but industries and dissimulations. For confidence, it

is the last but surest remedy; namely, to depress and seem to despise

whatsoever a man cannot attain; observing the good principle of the

merchants, who endeavor to raise the price of their own commodities, and

to beat down the price of others. But there is a confidence that passeth

this other; which is to face out a man's own defects, in seeming to

conceive that he is best in those things wherein he is failing; and, to

help that again, to seem on the other side that he hath least opinion of

himself in those things wherein he is best; like as we shall see it

commonly in poets; that if they show their verses, and you except to

any, they will say, that that line cost them more labor than any of the

rest; and presently will seem to disable and suspect rather some other

line, which they know well enough to be the best in the number."

"Few persons who talk of any virtue or quality," says Pascal, "are

inwardly acquainted or affected with it. We are all full of duplicity,

deceit, and contradiction. We love to wear a disguise, even within, and

are afraid of being detected by ourselves."

Infirmities and calamities have been made to serve important uses in the

designs of men. "It was necessary," says a writer upon Mahomet, "that

the religion he proposed to establish should have a divine sanction; and

for this purpose he turned a calamity with which he was afflicted to his

advantage. He was often subject to fits of epilepsy, a disease which

those whom it afflicts are desirous to conceal. Mahomet gave out,

therefore, that these fits were trances, into which he was miraculously

thrown by God Almighty, during which he was instructed in his will,

which he was commanded to publish to the world. By this strange story,

and by leading a retired, abstemious, and austere life, he easily

acquired a character for superior sanctity among his acquaintances and

neighbors. When he thought himself sufficiently fortified by the numbers

and enthusiasm of his followers, he boldly declared himself a prophet,

sent by God into the world, not only to teach his will, but to compel

mankind to obey it."

The world not only seems to be easily deceived, but seems to delight in

deception. "If you wish to be powerful," said Horne Tooke, "pretend to

be powerful." If you wish to be considered wise, systematically pretend

to be, and you will generally be acknowledged to be. We all know, for

instance, the influence of manner, as sometimes displayed by persons of

great assumed personal dignity. Every neighborhood is afflicted with

such pretenders. "Among those terms," says Whipple, indignantly, "which

have long ceased to have any vital meaning, the word dignity deserves a

disgraceful prominence. No word has fallen so readily into the designs

of cant, imposture, and pretense; none has played so well the part of

verbal scarecrow, to frighten children of all ages and both sexes. It is

at once the thinnest and most effective of all the coverings under which

duncedom sneaks and skulks. Most of the men of dignity, who awe or bore

their more genial brethren, are simply men who possess the art of

passing off their insensibility for wisdom, their dullness for depth,

and of concealing imbecility of intellect under haughtiness of manner.

Their success in this small game is one of the stereotyped satires upon

mankind. Once strip from these pretenders their stolen garments--once

disconnect their show of dignity from their real meanness--and they

would stand shivering and defenseless,--objects of the tears of pity,

or targets for the arrows of scorn.... Manner triumphs over matter; and

throughout society, politics, letters, and science, we are doomed to

meet a swarm of dunces and wind-bags, disguised as gentlemen, statesmen,

and scholars." When they open their mouths, it is to expand themselves

with a new inhalation of emptiness, or to depreciate or belittle what

they pretend is insignificant, when it only exceeds their capacity. They

put up their heads and expectorate with a smirky haughtiness, as if

everything worth knowing were known to them, when a single sensation of

modesty would envelop their moony faces with blushes. Every one has seen

such a character,--"an embodied tediousness, which society is apt not

only to tolerate, but to worship; a person who announces the stale

commonplaces of conversation with the awful precision of one bringing

down to the valleys of thought bright truths plucked on its summits; who

is so profoundly deep and painfully solid, on the weather, or some

nothing of the day; who is inexpressibly shocked if your eternal

gratitude does not repay him for the trite information he consumed your

hour in imparting; and who, if you insinuate that this calm, contented,

imperturbable stupidity is preying upon your patience, instantly stands

upon his dignity, and puts on a face." "A certain nobleman, some years

ago," says Bulwer, in one of his essays, "was conspicuous for his

success in the world. He had been employed in the highest situations, at

home and abroad, without one discoverable reason for his selection, and

without justifying the selection by one proof of administrative ability.

Yet at each appointment the public said, 'A great gain to the

government! Superior man!' And when from each office he passed away, or

rather passed imperceptibly onward toward offices still more exalted,

the public said, 'A great loss to the government! Superior man!' He was

the most silent person I ever met. But when the first reasoners of the

age would argue some knotty point in his presence, he would, from time

to time, slightly elevate his eyebrows, gently shake his head, or, by a

dexterous smile of significant complacency, impress on you the notion

how easily he could set those babblers right if he would but condescend

to give voice to the wisdom within him. I was very young when I first

met this superior man; and chancing on the next day to call on the late

Lord Durham, I said, in the presumption of early years, 'I passed six

mortal hours last evening in company with Lord ----. I don't think there

is much in him,' 'Good heavens!' cried Lord Durham, 'how did you find

that out? Is it possible that he could have--talked?'" Coleridge speaks

of a dignified man he once saw at a dinner-table. "He listened to me,"

says the poet, "and said nothing for a long time; but he nodded his

head, and I thought him intelligent. At length, toward the end of the

dinner, some apple dumplings were placed on the table, and my man had no

sooner seen them, than he burst forth with,--'Them's the jockies for

me!' I wish Spurzheim could have examined the fellow's head." The Duke

of Somerset is described as one of these dignified gentlemen. His second

wife was one of the most beautiful women in England. She once suddenly

threw her arms around his neck, and gave him a kiss which might have

gladdened the heart of an emperor. The duke, lifting his shoulders with

an aristocratic square, slowly said, "Madam, my first wife was a Howard,

and she never would have taken such a liberty!" If it were practicable

to expose the artifice and emptiness of such characters, the exhibition

would be as amusing as the scene once presented on the stage of a

theatre. The comedian was enveloped in a great India-rubber suit,

expanded by air to give it the proper proportions to represent Falstaff:

when just in the middle of one of the inimitable speeches of that

inimitable character, some wag of the stock insinuated a sharp-pointed

instrument into the immense windful garment: immediately the great

proportions of Falstaff began to diminish, attended by an audible

hissing noise; and before the discomposed actor, overwhelmed with the

laughter of the uproarious audience, could retire from the stage, he had

shrunk to an insignificant one hundred and fifty pounds avoirdupois,

with his deceptive covering hanging about his gaunt limbs in voluminous

folds! Such persons will generally be found in possession of good moral

habits--props they instinctively set up to sustain their pretenses. They

know by intuition that an affectation of wisdom and greatness would be

intolerable if attended by vicious propensities and practices; so they

cultivate with systematic carefulness all the forms of morality and

virtue. They know that their good habits will always insure the respect

of even those who detect and despise their emptiness. But they are never

heard to claim anything on the score of superior virtue; they demand to

be known as Solons--as abridgments of all that is profound and wonderful

known among men. Like the owl--that wise bird, sacred of old to

Minerva--they make their pretensions respected by the most commendable

propriety.

"Yorick had an invincible dislike and opposition in his nature to

gravity;--not to gravity as such;--for where gravity was wanted, he

would be the most grave or serious of mortal men for days and weeks

together; but he was an enemy to the affectation of it, and declared

open war against it, only as it appeared a cloak for ignorance, or

folly: and then, whenever it fell in his way, however sheltered and

protected, he seldom gave it any quarter. Sometimes, in his wild way of

talking, he would say, that gravity was an errant scoundrel, and, he

would add,--of the most dangerous kind too,--because a sly one; and that

he verily believed, more honest, well-meaning people were bubbled out of

their goods and money by it in one twelvemonth, than by pocket-picking,

and shoplifting in seven. In the naked temper which a merry heart

discovered, he would say there was no danger,--but to itself:--whereas

the very essence of gravity was design, and consequently deceit;--'twas

a taught trick, to gain credit of the world for more sense and knowledge

than a man was worth; and that, with all his pretensions,--it was no

better, but often worse, than what a French wit had long ago defined it,

viz.: A mysterious carriage of the body, to cover the defects of the

mind:--which definition of gravity, Yorick, with great imprudence, would

say, deserved to be wrote in letters of gold."

"Men in general," says Machiavelli, in his Prince, "judge more from

appearances than from reality. All men have eyes, but few have the gift

of penetration. Every one sees your exterior, but few can discern what

you have in your heart; and those few dare not oppose the voice of the

multitude."

A pretension to devoutness and asceticism was one of the fashions in

Moliere's time. In his play of Le Festin de Pierre, he makes Don Juan to

say: "The profession of hypocrite has marvelous advantages. It is an act

of which the imposture is always respected; and though it may be

discovered, no one dares do anything against it. All the other vices of

man are liable to censure, and every one has the liberty of boldly

attacking them; but hypocrisy is a privileged vice, which with its hand

closes everybody's mouth, and enjoys its repose with sovereign

impunity."

The absorbing desire for wealth--"that bad thing, gold," that "buys all

things good"--like ambition, "often puts men upon doing the meanest

offices: so climbing is performed in the same posture with creeping."

Almost every act may be a lie against the thought or motive which

prompted it. The great aim of the mere money-getter--to get and get

forever--involves him in false pretense and practical falsehood. He

advises to inveigle; he condoles and sympathizes to ruin. He talks of

liberalty, and never gives. He depreciates money and the love of it, at

the same time glows and dimples with the consciousness of his

possessions. He calls life a humbug or muck, and proves it by a

hypocritical exhibit of his gains. He puts a penny in the urn of

poverty, and sees clearly how he will get a shilling out. He whines for

wretchedness, forgetting the number he has made wretched. He gives to

religion, and plunders her devotees. He hires an expensive pew near the

pulpit, and cheats his woodsawyer and washerwoman. He builds costly

churches with tall steeples, and, writing the Almighty in his list of

debtors, formally bargains admission to heaven. "He falls down and

worships the god of this world, but will have neither its pomps, its

vanities, nor its pleasures, for his trouble. He begins to accumulate

treasure as a mean to happiness, and by a common but morbid association

he continues to accumulate it as an end. He lives poor to die rich, and

is the mere jailer of his house, and the turnkey of his wealth.

Impoverished by his gold, he slaves harder to imprison it in his chest

than his brother-slave to liberate it from the mine." "Some men," says

Chrysippus, in Athenaeus, "apply themselves with such eagerness to the

pursuit of money, that it is even related, that a man once, when near

his end, swallowed a number of pieces of gold, and so died. Another

person sewed a quantity of money into a tunic, and put it on, and then

ordered his servants to bury him in that dress, neither burning his

body, nor stripping it and laying it out." Foote, in endeavoring to

express the microscopic niggardliness of a miser of his acquaintance,

expressed a belief that he would be willing to take the beam out of his

own eye if he knew he could sell the timber. Doubtless, one source of

the miser's insane covetousness and parsimony is the tormenting fear of

dying a beggar--that "fine horror of poverty," according to Lamb, "by

which he is not content to keep want from the door, or at arm's-length,

but he places it, by heaping wealth upon wealth, at a sublime distance."

("All the arguments which are brought to represent poverty as no evil,"

impatiently exclaimed Dr. Johnson, "show it to be evidently a great

evil. You never find people laboring to convince you that you may live

very happily upon a plentiful fortune. So you hear people talking how

miserable a king must be; and yet they all wish to be in his place."

"One asks," says La Bruyere, "if, in comparing the different conditions

of men together, their sufferings and advantages, we cannot observe an

equal mixture, and a like assortment of good and evil, which settles

them on an equality, or at least makes one as desirable as the other:

the rich and powerful man, who wants nothing, may put the question, but

a poor man must answer it.") The hoarding habits of the miser remind one

of a device of American boatmen, at an early day, before the steamboat

was invented, and when the forest was infested with savages and robbers.

Receiving specie at New Orleans for their produce, they deposited it in

a wet buckskin belt, of sufficient length to surround the body, which,

as it dried, contracted and shrunk round the coin, till no amount of

shaking would cause it to jingle. So may the heart and soul of the

avaricious man shrink round his little heap of gold, until all healthy

circulation ceases, and his heart never jingles with a genuine,

generous, manly impulse.

Disraeli, in his Curiosities, gives an interesting philosophical sketch

of Audley,--the great Audley, as he was called in his time,--who

concentrated all the powers of a vigorous intellect in the accumulation

of wealth. He lived in England in the beginning of the seventeenth

century, through the reigns of James I. and Charles I., and, beginning

life with almost nothing, died worth four hundred thousand pounds

sterling. He "lived to view his mortgages, his statutes, and his

judgments so numerous, that it was observed, his papers would have made

a good map of England. This philosophical usurer never pressed hard for

his debts; like the fowler, he never shook his nets lest he might

startle, satisfied to have them, without appearing to hold them. With

great fondness he compared his 'bonds to infants, which battle best by

sleeping.' To battle is to be nourished, a term still retained at the

University of Oxford. His familiar companions were all subordinate

actors in the great piece he was performing; he too had his part in the

scene. When not taken by surprise, on his table usually laid open a

great Bible, with Bishop Andrews' folio Sermons, which often gave him an

opportunity of railing at the covetousness of the clergy! declaring

their religion was a 'mere preach,' and that 'the time would never be

well till we had Queen Elizabeth's Protestants again in fashion.' He was

aware of all the evils arising out of a population beyond the means of

subsistence, and dreaded an inundation of man, spreading like the spawn

of a cod. Hence he considered marriage, with a modern political

economist, as very dangerous; bitterly censuring the clergy, whose

children, he said, never thrived, and whose widows were left destitute.

An apostolic life, according to Audley, required only books, meat, and

drink, to be had for fifty pounds a year! Celibacy, voluntary poverty,

and all the mortifications of a primitive Christian, were the virtues

practiced by this Puritan among his money bags. Audley's was that

worldly wisdom which derives all its strength from the weaknesses of

mankind. Everything was to be obtained by stratagem, and it was his

maxim, that to grasp our object the faster, we must go a little round

about it. His life is said to have been one of intricacies and

mysteries, using indirect means in all things; but if he walked in a

labyrinth, it was to bewilder others; for the clew was still in his own

hand; all he sought was that his designs should not be discovered in

his actions. His word, we are told, was his bond; his hour was punctual;

and his opinions were compressed and weighty; but if he was true to his

bond-word, it was only a part of the system to give facility to the

carrying on of his trade, for he was not strict to his honor; the pride

of victory, as well as the passion for acquisition, combined in the

character of Audley, as in more tremendous conquerors. In the course of

time he purchased a position in the 'court of wards,' which enabled him

to plunder the estates of deceased persons and minors. When asked the

value of this new office, he replied that 'it might be worth some

thousands of pounds to him who after his death would go instantly to

heaven; twice as much to him who would go to purgatory, and nobody knows

what to him who would adventure to go to hell.'" What he thought of a

venture to the latter place, his four hundred thousand pounds must

speak.

Many and interesting as are the disguises of avarice, it is only in rank

and ancestry that you find perfect complacency and assurance. "We have

all heard," says Thackeray, "of the dying French duchess who viewed her

coming dissolution and subsequent fate so easily, because she said she

was sure that Heaven must deal politely with a person of her quality."

You recollect that other duchess, in Saint-Simon, who, on the death of a

sinner of illustrious race, said, "They may say what they like, but no

one shall persuade me that God does not think of it twice before he

damns a man of his birth." An old lady once said to De Tocqueville, "I

have been reading with great satisfaction the genealogies which prove

that Jesus Christ descended from David. It shows that our Lord was a

gentleman." "We are somewhat ashamed in general," said Senior to De

Tocqueville, "of Jewish blood; yet the Levis boast of their descent from

the Hebrew Levi." "They are proud of it," answered De Tocqueville;

"because they make themselves out to be cousins of the blessed Virgin.

They have a picture in which a Duke de Levi stands bareheaded before the

Virgin. 'Pray put your hat on, cousin,' she says. 'I had rather keep it

off,' he answered."

"Do we not every day meet with people," says Xavier de Maistre, "who

fancy they are ill because they are unshaven, or because some one has

thought they have looked poorly, and told them so? Dress has such

influence upon men's minds that there are valetudinarians who think

themselves in better health than usual when they have on a new coat and

well powdered wig. They deceive the public and themselves by their

nicety about dress, until one finds some fine morning they have died in

full fig, and their death startles everybody."

Library Notes · 第 5 / 32 段