“The auspicious occasion of my sixtieth birthday, occurring in

the 10th Moon of this year, was to have been a joyful event,

in which the whole nation would unite in paying to me loyal

and dutiful homage. It had been intended that His Majesty

the Emperor, accompanied by the whole Court, should proceed

to offer congratulations to me, and make obeisance at the

Summer Palace, and my officials and people have subscribed

funds wherewith to raise triumphal arches, and to decorate the

Imperial highway throughout its entire length from Peking to

the I-Ho Yüan; high altars have been erected where Buddhist

Sutras were to have been recited in my honour. I was not

disposed to be unduly obstinate and to insist on refusing these

honours, because, at the time that the celebration was planned,

my people were enjoying peace and prosperity; moreover, there

is precedent for such displays of pageantry and rejoicing in

the occasions on which the Emperors K’ang-Hsi and Ch’ien-Lung

celebrated their sixtieth birthdays. I, therefore, consented

to His Majesty’s filial request, and decided to receive

birthday congratulations at the Summer Palace. Who would ever

have anticipated that the Japanese (literally, ‘dwarf men’)

would have dared to force us into hostilities, and that since

the beginning of the summer they have invaded our tributary

State (Corea) and destroyed our fleet? We had no alternative

but to draw the sword and to commence a punitive campaign; at

this moment our armies are pressing to the front. The people

of both nations (China and Corea) are now involved in all the

horrors of war, and I am continually haunted by the thought

of their distress; therefore, I have issued a grant of three

million taels from my privy purse for the maintenance and

relief of our troops at the front.

“Although the date of my birthday is drawing close, how could

I have the heart, at such a time, to delight my senses with

revelries, or to receive from my subjects congratulations

which could only be sincere if we had won a glorious victory?

I therefore decree that the ceremonies to be observed on my

birthday shall be performed at the Palace in Peking, and all

preparations at the Summer Palace shall be abandoned forthwith.

The words of the Empress.”

To which the Emperor adds the filial remark on his own account: “That Her

Majesty had acted in accordance with the admirable virtue which always

distinguished her, and that, in spite of his own wishes, he was bound

reverently to obey her orders in the matter.”

China’s complete and ignominious defeat by the Japanese forces

undoubtedly inflicted no small loss of prestige on the Manchu Dynasty,

and was a direct cause of the violent agitation of the Southern Provinces

for reform, which led in turn to the _coup d’état_ and to the Boxer

rising. It is doubtful whether war could have been avoided without even

greater sacrifices and humiliation, and the Empress Dowager showed her

usual sagacity therefore in refraining from expressing any opinion or

taking any share of responsibility in the decision taken by the Emperor.

She knew, moreover, that, by the action and advice of her Chief Eunuch,

the Navy had for years been starved in order to provide her with funds

to rebuild and decorate the Summer Palace, a fact of which some of

China’s most distinguished advisers were at that time unaware.

As Viceroy of the Metropolitan Province, Li Hung-chang was generally

blamed for advising the Court to maintain China’s suzerainty over Corea

by force of arms, but, speaking from personal knowledge of this subject,

we may state that, like many other Ministers similarly situated, he

hesitated until the very last moment before taking risks which he knew to

be enormous in both directions. The documents upon which history might

have been written with full knowledge of the facts were unfortunately

destroyed in the Viceroy’s Yamên at Tientsin and in the Inspector-General

of Customs’ quarters at Peking, in 1900, so that the immediate causes

of that disastrous war will probably never be established with complete

accuracy. Li Hung-chang was aware that twice already Japan had been

bought off from a war of aggression against China, the first time (in

1874) by payment of an indemnity, and again (in 1885) by admitting her

to a share in the control of Corea, a concession which had led directly

to the present crisis. He realised that even had he been willing to

surrender China’s rights over Corea (which were of no real advantage to

the Chinese Government) the concession might have purchased peace for

the time being, but it would certainly have led before long to the loss

of the Manchurian Provinces; just as certainly, in fact, as the doom of

those provinces was sealed in 1905, on the day that China acquiesced in

the terms of the Portsmouth Treaty. Japan’s attack on China’s positions

was diplomatically as unjustifiable as the methods which she adopted in

commencing hostilities. Li Hung-chang was fully aware of the preparations

that Japan had been making for years, and equally aware of the

disorganised state of his own naval and military resources, but he was

surrounded by officials who, like the Manchus in 1900, were convinced of

China’s immense superiority, and he was assured by the Chinese Resident

in Corea (Yüan Shih-k’ai) that help would be forthcoming from England

in the event of Japan’s commencing hostilities. There was no doubt of

the British Government’s sympathy, which was clearly reflected in the

attitude and actions of the Consul-General at Seoul.[48]

Chinese historians have openly accused Li Hung-chang of instigating the

Court and the Emperor to a war of aggression, and the accusation has been

generally credited abroad. The truth is, that while Li was originally all

in favour of sending a Chinese force to suppress the Corean insurrection,

he became opposed to taking any steps that might lead to war with Japan,

as soon as he realised that war was Japan’s object; nevertheless, it is

certain that, in the last instance, he was persuaded against his better

judgment by the military enthusiasm of his German advisers, and that the

sending of the ill-fated “Kow-hsing” and her doomed crew to Corea was a

step which he authorised only after consultation with Peking and in full

knowledge of the fact that it meant war. No sooner had the “Kow-hsing”

been sunk, and the first military disasters of the campaign reported,

than he naturally endeavoured to minimise his own share of responsibility

in the matter.

Foreigners blamed him for making war on Japan, while his own countrymen

attacked him for betraying China to the Japanese, as they subsequently

attacked him for selling Manchuria to Russia. Tzŭ Hsi had no great love

for the Viceroy, although she admired his remarkable intelligence and

adroit methods: but when, after the war, he was fiercely attacked by

several of the Censors, and when she found her own name associated with

the blame imputed to him, she loyally defended him, as was her wont.

In 1895, a Censor named An Wei-chün boldly blamed Her Majesty and the

Viceroy for the disasters which had overtaken China. He said:—

“Li Hung-chang has invariably advanced himself because of his

relations with foreigners, and thus been led to conceive an

inflated opinion of his own merits. The ‘dwarf bandits’[49]

having rebelled, he seems to have been afraid that the large

sums of money, saved from numerous peculations, which he

had deposited in Japan might be lost; hence his objections

to the war. When the Decree declaring war reached him, his

disappointment was great, and he showed his resentment and

treachery by supplying the ‘dwarf bandits’ with supplies and

munitions of war. His only hope was that the ‘dwarfs’ would

prove victorious and his prophecy would thus be justified; to

this end he curtailed the supplies for our troops at the front,

diverting the funds for the same to his own pockets. He would

strongly oppose all those who urged a vigorous prosecution

of the campaign, rejoicing at our defeats and deploring our

successes. All the military commanders of the forces under his

orders humbly complied with his wishes, and invariably ran away

at the first sight of the enemy. The Censorate has been full of

Memorials denouncing the treacherous and unpatriotic action of

Li Hung-chang, so that there is no need for me to say anything

further on this subject.

“But I would like to add that Generals Yeh and Wei, who have

been cashiered and whose arrest has been decreed, are at this

very moment in hiding at Tientsin; they have made the Viceroy’s

Yamên itself a place of refuge for absconding criminals. This

is a matter of common knowledge and undoubtedly true. Then

again we have the case of Ting Ju-chang, who was ordered to

be arrested, but who persuaded Li Hung-chang to intercede for

him, on the plea that he was indispensable to China, being in

possession of a mysterious secret, an American invention which

he alone could manipulate, whereby all surrounding objects can

be rendered invisible. Li Hung-chang actually had the audacity

to make mention of this ridiculous invention in addressing

your Majesty, and it seems to me that if he is to be permitted

to refer to fables and unclean magic of this kind, he is

treating the Throne with shameless disrespect. Nevertheless,

none of your Majesty’s Councillors have ever dared to oppose

him, possibly because they themselves are too far gone in

senile decay to be able to bear any further burden of distress.

Their thoughts are far away, wool-gathering, or it may be that

they too have been smitten with fear at the thought of this

marvellous invention of Li Hung-chang’s whereby the landscape

may be completely befogged. If so, the fact would account

for the nebulous tendencies of their policy, and for their

remaining in ignorance of Li Hung-chang’s remarkable mendacity.

“The Imperial Decree whereby Shao Yu-lien and Chang Yin-huan

have been appointed Plenipotentiaries to discuss terms of

peace, has not yet been made public, because the Grand

Council are actually afraid openly to mention the word peace,

notwithstanding that they failed utterly in prosecuting the war

and in dignified insistence on our lawful rights. Their action

appears to me like that of a thief who having stolen a bell,

shuts his ears while carrying it away, blissfully forgetting

that everybody else can hear its tinkling. They do not seem to

be aware, these Councillors, that throughout the whole Empire

everybody is already aware of the fact that we are suing for

peace. Japan having objected to Shao on personal grounds, the

Grand Council has now actually gone so far as to suggest that

in his place Li Hung-chang’s son, Li Ching-fang[50] should be

appointed. This is simply an outrage. Li Ching-fang is nothing

more than the son-in-law of a Japanese traitor who calls

himself Chang Pang-chang, a man whom I have already impeached.

If such unspeakable traitors are permitted to go to Japan,

nothing will suit the Japanese better, and the negotiations

must inevitably result in our being badly cheated by these

pernicious robbers. Japan’s strength is purely superficial;

as a matter of fact, she is rotten to the core; if now we are

debarred from compelling Japan to fight a decisive battle, if

we meekly accept terms dictated by these low-born dwarfs, we

are simply in the position of a tributary State, and cannot

be described as equals in any treaty that may be made. In

other words, our glorious Empire is not only being ruined by

muddlers, but sold by traitors. There is not a single subject

of the Throne who does not gnash his teeth with rage, and long

to sink them in the flesh of Li Hung-chang.

“There are not lacking people who declare that this humiliating

policy of peace has been prompted by the Empress Dowager’s

Chief Eunuch, Li Lien-ying. For myself, I do not care to attach

undue importance to tea-house gossip, but as the Empress

Dowager has now handed over the reins of Government to your

Majesty, how can you possibly justify your position before

your ancestors and to your subjects, if you permit her still

to dictate to you, or to interfere in the business of the

State? What sort of a person is this Li Lien-ying who dares

to interfere in Government matters? If there be any truth

whatsoever in the rumour, it is assuredly incumbent upon your

Majesty to inflict severe punishment on this creature, if only

because of that House-law of your Dynasty which forbids eunuchs

to concern themselves in State affairs.

“The truth is that the Throne has been intimidated by Li

Hung-chang, and has taken his statements for granted, while the

Grand Council, chiefly composed of Li’s humble and obedient

servants, shields him from detection and punishment, fearing

that, if thwarted, he may raise the standard of rebellion. They

accordingly do their best to justify him in the eyes of your

Majesty, failing to realise that he has always been a traitor

at heart. His is the will, if not the power, to rebel. His army

is composed of corrupt and useless creatures quite devoid of

any military knowledge or instincts, while his troops are ever

on the verge of mutiny, because they are always defrauded of

their pay. They are quite deficient in _esprit de corps_, and

the small foreign forces lately organised at Tientsin would

more than suffice to overcome Li Hung-chang and all his host.

The truth of these statements can easily be verified. Long ago,

if he had had the power, he would surely have rebelled; but as

he cannot do so, he contents himself with bullying your Majesty

and disregarding your Imperial Decrees. He totally ignores

the existence of the Empress Dowager and of your Majesty,

a fact which may be inferred from his daring to insult

your intelligence with his mysterious powers of conferring

invisibility.

“I am covered with shame and amazement. My only hope is that

your Majesty will now display the majesty of your wrath, and,

after disclosing Li Hung-chang’s treason to all men, will

put this traitor to death. By this means our troops would at

once be inspired to valour, and the ‘dwarf bandits’ would be

completely annihilated. At the same time, I would ask you to be

so good as to behead me also, as a fitting punishment for this

plain speaking. Your Majesty’s Imperial ancestors are present

in the spirit, and they bear me witness. I am quite easy in my

mind as to the issue, and I therefore lay bare the innermost

thoughts of my heart and lay them before your Majesty,

anxiously begging for your Imperial decision.”

In reply to this outspoken document, the Emperor issued the following

Decree, which bears unmistakable signs of Tzŭ Hsi’s hand. The attack upon

her favourite, Li Lien-ying, was in itself sufficient to bring her to the

front, and there is no doubt that at the time she was keeping very close

watch on the Emperor’s proceedings, and regularly perusing all State

papers.

“Owing to the seriousness of recent events, we have been

particularly anxious of late to receive and attend to the

unprejudiced suggestions of our Censors, and we have abstained

from punishing any of them, even when they have made use of

improper expressions in addressing us. With the gracious

consent of Her Majesty the Empress Dowager, we have given

particular attention to all projects whereby the welfare of our

people may be advanced, and all our people must by this time

be aware of our sincere desire to promote good Government. In

spite of this the Censor, An Wei-chün, has to-day submitted

a Memorial based entirely upon rumours, and containing the

following sentence:—‘How can you possibly justify your position

before your ancestors and to your subjects if you permit the

Empress Dowager still to dictate to you, or to interfere in the

business of the State?’

“Language of this kind reveals depths of audacity unspeakable,

the unbridled licence of a madman’s tongue. Were we to fail in

inflicting stern punishment in a case of this kind, the result

might well be to produce estrangement between Her Majesty the

Empress and ourselves. The Censor is, therefore, dismissed from

office and sentenced to banishment at the post-roads, on the

western frontier where he shall expiate his guilt and serve as

a wholesome warning to others. His Memorial is handed back to

him with the contempt it deserves.”

Tzŭ Hsi felt deeply the humiliation of her country’s defeat by the

Japanese, a race which, as Chinese historians never fail to remind

themselves, took its first lessons in civilisation and culture from

Chinese scholars and artists. Anxious at all costs to avoid another

invasion of Chihli by the conquerors, she approved the Treaty of

Peace, especially when assured by Li Hung-chang that Russia and her

Continental allies would not allow Japan to annex any portion of the

Manchurian Provinces. As above stated, she declined to permit Li to be

made a scapegoat either by her chagrined Manchu kinsmen or by his fierce

critics in the south, for she recognised the difficulty of his position,

and the fact that he was not directly responsible for the deplorable

condition of China’s defences. But, woman-like, she had to blame someone

for the disasters that had deprived her and her capital of festivities

whose splendour should have gone down, making her name glorious, to all

posterity; and it was not surprising, therefore, if she heaped reproaches

on the Emperor for entering upon so disastrous a war without her full

knowledge and consent. It was at this time that began the estrangement

which thenceforward gradually grew into the open hostility and secret

plottings of 1898, the long bitterness between Tzŭ Hsi and her nephew

which was to divide the Palace into camps of strife, and to cease only

with their death. From this time also, as they aver who were in close

touch with the life of the Court, the Emperor’s Consort,[51] Tzŭ Hsi’s

niece, became openly alienated from him, and their relations grew more

severely strained as his reform tendencies developed and took shape.

From 1894 to 1896 there was no noticeable change in the attitude of

the Emperor to his august aunt, nor any diminution of his respectful

attentions, but the man in the street knew well, as he always knows in

China, of the rift in the lute, and when, in 1896, the Emperor’s mother

(Tzŭ’s sister) died, it was realised that the last bond of amity and

possible reconciliation between Kuang-Hsü and the Empress Dowager had

been severed.

XII

THE REFORM MOVEMENT OF 1898

At the beginning of 1898 the Grand Council was composed of the following

officials: Prince Kung, the Emperor’s uncle, Prince Li, whose son was

married to Jung Lu’s daughter, Kang Yi,[52] Liao Shou-heng and Weng

T’ung-ho, the Grand Secretary and ex-tutor to the Emperor. The Empress

Dowager was still leading her life of dignified leisure at the Summer

Palace, generally in company with her two confidential friends, the

wife of Jung Lu and her adopted daughter, the Princess Imperial. By all

accounts she was amusing herself with picnics on the K’un Ming lake,

elaborate theatrical performances and excursions to the neighbouring

temples and hill shrines, devoting her leisure from these pursuits to

verse-making and painting, but keeping herself fully informed, through

Kang Yi and Prince Li, of all that took place in the Forbidden City.

Although leaving the conduct of State affairs to the Emperor, she

occasionally visited the city for a day or two, while the Emperor, on

his side, punctiliously repaired to the Summer Palace five or six times

a month to pay his respects to the Old Buddha. Their relations at this

period were outwardly friendly. Kuang-Hsü never failed to consult Her

Majesty before the issue of any important Decree, and Tzŭ Hsi was usually

most cordial in her manner towards him. She had, it is true, occasion

to reprove him more than once on account of reports which reached her,

through the eunuchs, of his violent temper and alleged bad treatment of

his attendants, reports which were probably instigated and exaggerated by

Li Lien-ying for his own purposes. But Kuang-Hsü, as events subsequently

proved, was fully aware of the iron hand in the velvet glove. Whenever

the Empress came to Peking, he obeyed strictly the etiquette which

required him reverently to kneel at the Palace gates to welcome her. When

visiting her at the Summer Palace, he was not permitted to announce his

arrival in person, but was obliged to kneel at the inner gate and there

await the summons of admission from the Chief Eunuch. Li, who hated him,

delighted in keeping him waiting, sometimes as much as half an hour,

before informing the Old Buddha of his presence. At each of these visits

he was compelled, like any of the Palace officials, to pay his way by

large fees to the eunuchs in attendance on Her Majesty, and as a matter

of fact, these myrmidons treated him with considerably less respect than

they showed to many high Manchu dignitaries. Within the Palace precincts,

the Son of Heaven was indeed regarded as of little account, so that the

initiative and determination which he displayed during the hundred days

of reform in the summer of 1898 came as a disturbing surprise to many at

Court and showed that, given an opportunity, he was not wholly unworthy

of the Yehonala blood of his mother, Tzŭ Hsi’s sister.

The official who had hitherto exercised most influence over the Emperor

was Weng T’ung-ho, the Imperial tutor. He had only rejoined the Grand

Council in November 1894, at the critical time when the disastrous

opening of the war with Japan had brought about the dismissal of the

former Council; but as Imperial tutor he had had the _entrée_ of the

Palace ever since the Emperor was five years old. He was the leader of

the southern party in the capital. A native of Kiangsu (the birthplace

of all the greatest scholars of China during the present Dynasty, and

the centre of national culture), he hated the narrow conservatism of the

Manchus, and included in his dislike the Chinese of the Metropolitan

Provinces, whose politics and point of view are very similar to those of

the Manchus. The strife between north and south really dated from the

beginning of Kuang-Hsü’s reign. The two protagonists on the northern

side were Hsü T’ung, a well-educated Chinese Bannerman (for all

practical purposes, a Manchu at heart) who had been tutor to the Emperor

T’ung-Chih; and Li Hung-tsao, a native of Chihli, who had joined the

Grand Council at the same time as Weng T’ung-ho. The southern party was

led by Weng T’ung-ho and P’an Tsu-yin, the latter a native of Soochow and

a most brilliant scholar and essayist. It is necessary to dwell on this

party strife and its development, because it was the first cause of the

reform movement of 1898, of the subsequent resumption of the Regency by

Tzŭ Hsi, and, eventually, of the Boxer rising.

For more than twenty years these four high officials had been colleagues

in Peking, meeting one another constantly in social as well as official

circles. Their literary arguments, in which the quick-witted southerners

generally scored, were the talk of the capital. All four men bore good

reputations for integrity, so that literary graduates entering official

life were glad to become their _protégés_; but the adherents of the

southern party were the more numerous. This fact aroused the jealousy of

Li and Hsü, which grew until it found vent publicly at the metropolitan

examination for the “Chin Shih,” or Doctor’s, degree in 1899, on which

occasion Li was Grand Examiner and P’an Tsu-yin his chief Associate.

P’an, whose duty it was to select the best essays, recommended a native

of Kiangsu for the high honour of _optimus_, but Li declined to endorse

his decision, and gave the award to a Chihli man. P’an thereupon openly

accused Li of prejudice and unfairness towards the southerner, and

twitted him besides on his second-rate scholarship.

At the time of Russia’s seizure of Ili, in 1880, Hsü T’ung and Weng

T’ung-ho were respectively Presidents of the Boards of Ceremonies and

Works. At a conference of the highest officials, held in the Palace, Weng

declared himself in favour of war with Russia, but Hsü, after promising

to support him, left him in the lurch at the last moment, causing him

discomfiture and loss of face. Hence, bitter enmity between them,

which increased in intensity when they became the leaders of the rival

factions. Weng was also on bad terms with Jung Lu, who had never forgiven

him for the part he played in 1880, when Weng denounced his impious

_liaison_ to the Empress Dowager and brought about his dismissal. Jung

Lu, as a loyal Manchu, naturally favoured the northern faction and his

personal feelings prompted him in the same direction.

China under the Empress Dowager · 第 14 / 44 段