II. We get here the measure of acceptable work.

We have a long catalogue, very interesting in many respects, of the

various gifts that the people brought. Such sentences as these occur

over and over again--'And every man with whom was found' so-and-so

'brought it'; 'And all the women did spin with their hands, and brought

that which they had spun'; 'And the rulers brought' so-and-so. Such

statements embody the very plain truism that what we have settles what

we are bound to give. Or, to put it into grander words, capacity is the

measure of duty. Our work is cut out for us by the faculties and

opportunities that God has given us.

That is a very easy thing to say, but it is an uncommonly hard thing

honestly to apply. For there are plenty of people that are smitten with

very unusual humility whenever you begin to talk to them about work.

'It is not in my way,' 'I am not capable of that kind of service,' and

so on, and so on. One would believe in the genuineness of the excuse

more readily if there were anything about which such people said,

'Well, I _can_ do that, at all events'; but such an all-round modesty,

which is mostly observable when service is called for, is suspicious.

It might be well for some of these retiring and idle Christians to

remember the homely wisdom of 'You never know what you can do till you

try.' On the other hand, there are many Christians who, for want of

honest looking into their own power, for want of what I call sanctified

originality, are content to run in the ruts that other people's

vehicles have made, without asking themselves whether that is the gauge

that their wheels are fit for. Both these sets of people flagrantly

neglect the plain law that what we have settles what we should give.

The form as well as the measure of our service is determined thereby.

'She hath done what she could,' said Jesus Christ about Mary. We often

read that, as if it were a kind of apology for a sentimental and

useless gift, because it was the best that she could bestow. I do not

hear that tone in the words at all. I hear, rather, this, that duty is

settled by faculty, and that nobody else has any business to interfere

with that which a Christian soul, all aflame with the love of God,

finds to be the spontaneous and natural expression of its devotion to

the Master. The words are the vindication of the form of loving

service; but let us not forget that they are also a very stringent

requirement as to its measure, if it is to please Christ. 'What she

could'; the engine must be worked up to the last ounce of pressure that

it will stand. All must be got out of it that can be got out of it. Is

that the case about us? We talk about hard work for Christ. Have any of

us ever, worked up to the edge of our capacity? I am afraid that if the

principles that lie in this catalogue were applied to us, whether about

our gold and silver, or about our more precious spiritual and mental

possessions, _we_ could not say, 'Every man with whom was found' this,

that, and the other, 'brought it for the work.'

III. Notice, again, how in this list of offerings there comes out the

great thought of the infinite variety of forms of service and offering,

which are all equally needful and equally acceptable.

The list begins with 'bracelets, and earrings, and rings, and tablets,

all jewels of gold.' And then it goes on to 'blue, and purple, and

scarlet, and fine linen, and red skins of rams, and badgers' skins, and

shittim wood.' And then we read that the 'women did spin with their

hands, and brought that which they had spun'--namely, the same things

as have been already catalogued, 'the blue, and purple, and scarlet,

and fine linen.' That looks as if the richer gave the raw material, and

the women gave the labour. Poor women! they could not give, but they

could spin. They had no stores, but they had ten fingers and a distaff,

and if some neighbour found the stuff, the ten fingers joyfully set the

distaff twirling, and spun the yarn for the weavers. Then there were

others who willingly undertook the rougher work of spinning, not dainty

thread for the rich soft stuffs whose colours were to glow in the

sanctuary, but the coarse black goat's hair which was to be made into

the heavy covering of the roof of the tabernacle. No doubt it was less

pleasant labour than the other, but it got done by willing hands. And

then, at the end of the whole enumeration, there comes, 'And the rulers

brought precious stones, and spices, and oil,' and all the expensive

things that were needed. The large subscriptions are at the bottom of

the list, and the smaller ones are in the place of honour. All this

just teaches us this--what a host of things of all degrees of

preciousness in men's eyes go to make God's great building!

So various were the requirements of the work on hand. Each man's gift

was needed, and each in its place was equally necessary. The jewels on

the high-priest's breastplate were no more nor less essential than the

wood that made some peg for a curtain, or than the cheap goat's-hair

yarn that was woven into the coarse cloth flung over the roof of the

Tabernacle to keep the wet out. All had equal consecration, because all

made one whole. All was equally precious, if all was given with the

same spirit. So there is room for all sorts of work in Christ's great

house, where there are not only 'vessels of gold and of silver, but

also of wood and of earth,' and all 'unto honour ... meet for the

Master's use.' The smallest deed that co-operates to a great end is

great. 'The more feeble are necessary.' Every one may find a corner

where his special possession will work into the general design. If I

have no jewels to give, I can perhaps find some shittim wood, or, if I

cannot manage even that, I can at least spin some other person's yarn,

even though I have only a distaff, and not a loom to weave it in. Many

of us can do work only when associated with others, and can render best

service by helping some more highly endowed. But all are needed, and

welcomed, and honoured, and rewarded. The owner of all the slaves sets

one to be a water-carrier, and another to be his steward. It is of

little consequence whether the servant be Paul or Timothy, the Apostle

or the Apostle's helper. 'He worketh the work of the Lord, as I also

do,' said the former about the latter. All who are associated in the

same service are on one level.

I remember once being in the treasury of a royal palace. There was a

long gallery in which the Crown valuables were stored. In one

compartment there was a great display of emeralds, and diamonds, and

rubies, and I know not what, that had been looted from some Indian

rajah or other. And in the next case there lay a common quill pen, and

beside it a little bit of discoloured coarse serge. The pen had signed

some important treaty, and the serge was a fragment of a flag that had

been borne triumphant from a field where a nation's destinies had been

sealed. The two together were worth a farthing at the outside, but they

held their own among the jewels, because they spoke of brain-work and

bloodshed in the service of the king. Many strangely conjoined things

lie side by side in God's jewel-cases. Things which people vulgarly

call large and valuable, and what people still more vulgarly call small

and worthless, have a way of getting together there. For in that place

the arrangement is not according to what the thing would fetch if it

were sold, but what was the thought in the mind and the emotion in the

heart which gave it. Jewels and camel's hair yarn and gold and silver

are all massed together. Wood is wanted for the Temple quite as much as

gold and silver and precious stones.

So, whatever we have, let us bring that; and whatever we are, let us

bring that. If we be poor and our work small, and our natures limited,

and our faculties confined, it does not matter. A man is accepted

'according to that he hath, and not according to that he hath not.' God

does not ask how much we have given or done, if we have given or done

what we could. But He does ask how much we have kept back, and takes

strict account of the unsurrendered possessions, the unimproved

opportunities, the unused powers. He gives much who gives all, though

his all be little; he gives little who gives a part, though the part be

much. The motive sanctifies the act, and the completeness of the

consecration magnifies it. 'Great' and 'small' are not words for God's

Kingdom, in which the standard is not quantity but quality, and quality

is settled by the purity of the love which prompts the deed, and the

consequent thoroughness of self-surrender which it expresses. Whoever

serves God with a whole heart will render to Him a whole strength, and

will thus bring Him the gifts which He most desires.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers · 第 263 / 329 题