THE BREAD OF GOD

'Then said the Lord unto Moses, Behold, I will rain

bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out

and gather a certain rate every day, that I may prove

them, whether they will walk in My law, or no. 5. And

it shall come to pass, that on the sixth day they shall

prepare that which they bring in; and it shall be twice

as much as they gather daily. 6. And Moses and Aaron said

unto all the children of Israel, At even, then ye shall

know that the Lord hath brought you out from the land of

Egypt: 7. And in the morning, then ye shall see the glory

of the Lord; for that He heareth your murmurings against

the Lord: and what are we, that ye murmur against us?

8. And Moses said, This shall be, when the Lord shall give

you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread

to the full; for that the Lord heareth your murmurings

which ye murmur against Him: and what are we? your murmurings

are not against us, but against the Lord, 9. And Moses

spake unto Aaron, Say unto all the congregation of the

children of Israel, Come near before the Lord: for He

hath heard your murmurings. 10. And it came to pass, as

Aaron spake unto the whole congregation of the children

of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and,

behold, the glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud.

11. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 12. I have

heard the murmurings of the children of Israel: speak

unto them, saying, At even ye shall eat flesh, and in

the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall

know that I am the Lord your God.'--EXODUS xvi. 4-12.

Unbelief has a short memory. The Red Sea is forgotten in a month. The

Israelites could strike their timbrels and sing their lyric of praise,

but they could not believe that to-day's hunger could be satisfied.

Discontent has a slippery memory. They wish to get back to the

flesh-pots, of which the savour is in their nostrils, and they have

forgotten the bitter sauce of affliction. When they were in Egypt, they

shrieked about their oppression, and were ready to give up anything for

liberty; when they have got it, they are ready to put their necks in

the yoke again, if only they can have their stomachs filled. Men do not

know how happy they are till they cease to be so. Our present miseries

and our past blessings are the themes on which unbelief harps. Let him

that is without similar sin cast the first stone at these grumbling

Israelites. Without following closely the text of the narrative, we may

throw together the lessons of the manna.

I. Observe God's purpose in the gift, as distinctly expressed in the

promise of it.

'That I may prove them, whether they will walk in My law or no.' How

did the manna become a test of this? By means of the law prescribed for

gathering it. There was to be a given quantity daily, and twice as much

on the sixth day. If a man trusted God for to-morrow, he would be

content to stop collecting when he had filled his omer, tempting as the

easily gathered abundance would be. Greed and unbelief would masquerade

then as now, under the guise of prudent foresight. The old Egyptian

parallels to 'make hay while the sun shines,' and suchlike wise sayings

of the philosophy of distrust, would be solemnly spoken, and listened

to as pearls of wisdom. When experience had taught that, however much a

man gathered, he had no more than his omer full, after all,--and is not

that true yet?--then the next temptation would be to practise economy,

and have something over for to-morrow. Only he who absolutely trusted

God to provide for him would eat up his portion, and lie down at night

with a quiet heart, knowing that He who had fed him would feed. When

experience had taught that what was saved rotted, then laziness would

come in and say, 'What is the use of gathering twice as much on the

sixth day? Don't we know that it will not keep?' So the whole of the

gift was a continual training of, and therefore a continual test for,

faith. God willed to let His gifts come in this hand-to-mouth fashion,

though He could have provided at once what would have obviously lasted

them all their wilderness life, in order that they might be habituated

to cling to Him, and that their daily bread might be doubly for their

nourishment, feeding their bodies and strengthening that faith which,

to them as to us, is the condition of all blessedness. God lets our

blessings, too, trickle to us drop by drop, instead of pouring them in

a flood all at once upon us, for the same reason. He does so, not

because of any good to Him from our faith, except that the Infinite

love loves infinitely to be loved; but for our sakes, that we may taste

the peace and strength of continual dependence, and the joy of

continual receiving. He could give us the principal down; but He

prefers to pay us the interest, as we need it.

Christianity does not absolutely forbid laying up money or other

resources for future wants. But the love of accumulating, which is so

strong in many professing Christians, and the habit of amassing beyond

all reasonable future wants, is surely scarcely permitted to those who

profess to believe that incarnate wisdom forbade taking anxious care

for the morrow, and sent its disciples to lilies and birds to learn the

happy immunities of faith. We too get our daily mercies to prove us.

The letter of the law for the manna is not applicable to us who gain

our bread by God's blessing on our labour. But the spirit is, and the

members of great commercial nations have surely little need to be

reminded that still the portion put away is apt to breed worms. How

often it vanishes, or, if it lasts, tortures its owner, who has more

trouble keeping it than he had in getting it; or fatally corrupts his

own character, or ruins his children! All God's gifts are tests,

which--thanks be to Him--is the same as to say that they are means of

increasing faith, and so adding to joy.

II. The manna was further a disclosure of the depth of patient

long-suffering in God.

Very strikingly the 'murmurings' of the children of Israel are four

times referred to in this context, and on each occasion are stated as

the reason for the gift of the manna. It was God's answer to the

peevish complaints of greedy appetites. When they were summoned to come

near to the Lord, with the ominous warning that 'He hath heard your

murmurings,' no doubt many a heart began to quake; and when the Glory

flashed from the Shechinah cloud, it would burn lurid to their

trembling consciences. But the message which comes from it is sweet in

its gentleness, as it promises the manna because they have murmured,

and in order that they may know the Lord. A mother soothes her crying

infant by feeding it from her own bosom. God does not take the rod to

His whimpering children, but rather tries to win them by patience, and

to shame their unbelief by His swift and over-abundant answers to their

complaints. When He must, He punishes; but when He can, He complies.

Faith is the condition of our receiving His highest gifts; but even

unbelief touches His heart with pity, and what He can give to it, He

does, if it may be melted into trust. The farther men stray from Him,

the more tender and penetrating His recalling voice. We multiply

transgressions, He multiplies mercies.

III. The manna was a revelation in miraculous and transient form of an

eternal truth.

The God who sent it sends daily bread. The words which Christ quoted in

His wilderness hunger are the explanation of its meaning as a witness

to this truth: 'Man doth not live by bread alone, but by every word

that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.' To a Christian, the divine

power is present and operative in all natural processes as really as in

those which we call miraculous. God is separable from the universe, but

the universe is not separable from God. If it were separated, it would

cease. So far as the reality of the divine operation is concerned, it

matters not whether He works in the established fashion, through

material things, or whether His will acts directly. The chain which

binds a phenomenon to the divine will may be long or short; the

intervening links may be many, or they may be abolished, and the divine

cause and the visible effect may touch without anything between. But in

either case the power is of God. Bread made out of flour grown on the

other side of the world, and fashioned by the baker, and bought by the

fruits of my industry, is as truly the gift of God as was the manna.

For once, He showed these men His hand at work, that we all might know

that it was at work, when hidden. The lesson of the 'angel's food'

eaten in the wilderness is that men are fed by the power of God's

expressed and active will,--for that is the meaning of 'the word that

proceedeth out of the mouth of God,'--in whatever fashion they get

their food. The gift of it is from Him; its power to nourish is from

Him. It is as true to-day as ever it was: 'Thou openest Thine hand, and

satisfiest the desire of every living thing.' The manna ceased when the

people came near cornfields and settled homes. Miracles end when means

are possible. But the God of the miracle is the God of the means.

Commentators make much of what is supposed to be a natural substratum

for the manna, in a certain vegetable product, found in small

quantities in parts of the Arabian peninsula. No doubt, we are to

recognise in the plagues of Egypt, and in the dividing of the Red Sea,

the extraordinary action of ordinary causes; and there is no objection

in principle to doing so here. But that an exudation from the bark of a

shrub, which has no nutritive properties at all, is found only in one

or two places in Arabia, and that only at certain seasons and in

infinitesimal quantity, seems a singularly thin 'substratum' on which

to build up the feeding of two millions of people, more or less

exclusively and continuously for forty years, by means of a substance

which has nothing to do with tamarisk-trees, and is like the natural

product in nothing but sweetness and name. Whether we admit connection

between the two, or not, the miraculous character of the manna of the

Israelites is unaffected. It was miraculous in its origin--'rained from

heaven,' in its quantity, in its observance of times and seasons, in

its putrefaction and preservation,--as rotting when kept for greed, and

remaining sweet when preserved for the Sabbath. It came straight from

the creative will of God, and whether its name means 'What is it?' or

'It is a gift,' the designation is equally true and appropriate,

pointing, in the one case, to the mystery of its nature; in the other,

to the love of the Giver, and in both referring it directly to the hand

of God.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers · 第 217 / 329 题