1. Men become Christians by a great emigration.

'Get thee out from thy father's house, and from thy country, and from

thy kindred,' was the command to Abram. And he became the heir to God's

promises and the father of the faithful, because he did not hesitate a

moment to make the plunge and to leave behind him all his past, his

associations, his loves, much of his possessions, and, in a very

profound sense, his old self, and put a great impassable gulf between

him and them all.

Now I am not going to say anything so narrow or foolish as that the

Christian life must always begin with a conscious and sudden change;

but this I am quite sure of, that in the vast majority of cases of

thoroughly and out-and-out religious men, there must be a conscious

change, whether it has been diffused through months or years, or

concentrated in one burning moment. There has been a beginning; whether

it has been like the dawn, or whether it has been like the kindling of

a candle, the beginning of the flashing of the divine light into the

heart; and the men that are most really under the influence of

religious truth can, as a rule, looking back upon their past

experience, see that it divides itself into two halves, separated from

each other by a profound gulf--the time on the other side, and that on

this side, of the great river. We must take heed lest by insisting on

any one way of entrance into the kingdom we seem to narrow God's mercy,

or sadden true hearts, or make the method of approach a test of the

fact of entrance. God's city has more than twelve gates; they open to

all the thirty-two points of the compass, yet there is, in the

religious experience of the truest saints, always something analogous

to this change. And what I desire to press upon you is, that unless you

are only religious people after the popular superficial fashion of the

day, there will be something like it in your lives.

There will be a change in a man's deepest self, so that he will be a

'new creature,' with new tastes, new motives stirring to action, new

desires pressing for satisfaction, new loves sweetly filling his heart,

new insight into the meanings and true good of life and time guiding

his conduct, new aversions withdrawing him from old delights which have

become hateful now, new hopes pluming their growing wings, and new

powers bearing him along a new road. There will be a change in his

relations to God and to God's will. God in Christ will have become his

centre, instead of self, which was so before. He lives in a new world,

being himself a new man.

Our Lord uses this very illustration when He says, 'He that heareth My

Word, and believeth Him that sent Me, hath eternal life, and cometh not

into judgment, but hath passed out of death into life.' That is a great

migration, is it not, from the condition of a corpse to that of a

living man? Paul, too, gives the same idea with a somewhat different

turn of the illustration, when he gives 'thanks to the Father who

delivered us out of the power of darkness, and translated us into the

kingdom of,'--not, as we might expect to complete the antithesis, 'the

light,' but--the 'kingdom of the Son of His love,' which is the same

thing as the light. The illustration is probably drawn from the

practice of the ancient conquering monarchs, who, when they subjugated

a country, were wont to lead away captive long files of its inhabitants

as compulsory colonists, and set them down in another land. Thus the

conquering Christ comes, and those whom He conquers by His love, He

shifts by a great emigration out of the dominion of that darkness which

is at once tyranny and anarchy, and leads them into the happy kingdom

of the light.

Thus, then, all Christian men become such, because they turn their

backs upon their old selves, and crucify their affections and lusts;

and paste down the leaf, as it were, on which their blotted past is

writ, and turn over a new and a fairer one. And my question to you,

dear brethren, is, Are you men from the other side, who were not born

where you live now, and who have passed out of the native Chaldea into

the foreign--and yet to the new self home--land of union with God?

2. This designation may be taken as teaching that a Christian should be

known as a foreigner, a man from across the water.

Everybody in Canaan that knew Abram at all knew him as not one of

themselves. The Hebrew was the name he went by, because his unlikeness

to the others was the most conspicuous thing about him, even to the

shallowest eye. Abram found himself, when he had migrated into Canaan,

in no barbarous country, but plunged at once into the midst of an

organised and compact civilisation, that walled its cities, and had the

comforts and conveniences and regularities of a settled order; and in

the midst of it all, what did he do? He elected to live in a tent. 'He

dwelt in tabernacles, as the Epistle to the Hebrews comments upon his

history, 'because he looked for a city.' The more his expectations were

fixed upon a permanent abode, the more transitory did he make his abode

here. If there had been no other city to fill his eyes, he would have

gone and lived in some of those that were in the land. If there had

been no other order to which he felt himself to belong, he would have

had no objection to cast in his lot with the order and the people with

whom he lived on friendly terms. But although he bought and sold with

them, and fought for them and by their sides, and acquired from them

land in which to bury his dead, he was not one of them, but said, 'No!

I am not going into your city. I stay in my tent under this terebinth

tree; for I am here as a stranger and a sojourner.' No doubt there were

differences of language, dress, and a hundred other little things which

helped the impression made on the men of the land by this strange

visitor who lived in amity but in separation, and they are all

crystallised in the name which the popular voice gave him, 'The man

from the other side.'

That is the impression which Christian people ought to make in the

world. They should be recognised, by even unobservant eyes who know

nothing of the inner secret of their lives, as plainly belonging to

another order. If we seek to keep fresh in our own minds the

consciousness that we do so, it will make itself manifest in all our

bearing and actions. So that exhortation to cultivate the continual

sense that our true city--the mother city of our hearts and hopes--is

in heaven is ever to be reiterated, and as constantly obeyed, as the

necessary condition of a life worthy of our true affinities and of our

glorious hopes.

Nor less needful is the other exhortation--live by the laws of your own

land, not by those of the foreign country where you are for a time. If

you do that thoroughly, you will not need to say, 'I am from another

country.' Your conduct will say it for you. An English ship is a bit of

England, in whatever latitude it may be, and however far beyond the

three-mile limit of the King's authority upon the seas it may float.

And so, wherever there is a Christian man, there is a bit of God's

kingdom, and over that little speck in the midst of the ocean of the

world the flag with the Cross on it should fly, and the laws of the

Christ should be the only laws that have currency. If it could be said

of us as Haman said to his king about the Jews, that we were a people

with laws 'diverse from those of all people,' we should be doing more

than, alas! most of us do, to honour Him whom we profess to serve.

Follow Christ, and people will be quick enough to say of you 'The man

from the other side,' 'He does not belong to our city.' There is no

need for ostentation, nor for saying, 'Come and see my zeal for the

Lord,' nor for blowing trumpets before us at street corners or

elsewhere. The less of all that the better. The more we try to do the

common things done by the folk round us, but from another motive, the

more powerful will be our witness for our Master.

For instance, when John Knox was in the French galleys, he was fastened

to the same oar with some criminal, perhaps a murderer. The two men sat

on the same bench, did the same work, tugged at the same heavy sweep,

were fed with the same food, suffered the same sorrows. Do you think

there was any doubt as to the infinite gulf between them? We may be

working side by side, at the very same tasks, and under similar

circumstances, with men that have no share in our faith, and no

sympathy with our hopes and aspirations, and yet, though doing the same

thing, it will _not_ be the same thing. And if we keep Christ before

us, and follow His steps who has left us an example, depend upon it

people will very soon find out that we are men 'from across the water.'

Notice, further, how this dissimilarity and obvious aloofness from the

order of things in which we dwell is still perfectly compatible with

all sorts of helpful associations. The context shows us that. There had

come a flood of invasion, under kings with strange and barbarous names,

from the far East. They had swept down upon the fertile valley of

Siddim, and there had inflicted devastation. Amongst the captives had

been Lot, Abram's relative, and all his goods had been taken. One

fugitive, as it appears, had escaped, and the first thing he did was to

go straight to 'the man from the other side,' and tell him about it, as

if sure of sympathy and help. No doubt the relationship between Abram

and Lot was the main reason why the panting survivor made his way to

the hills where Abram's tent was pitched, but there was also confidence

in his willingness to help the Sodomites who had lost their goods. So

it was not to the sons of Heth in Mamre that the fugitive turned in his

extremity, but he 'told Abram the Hebrew.'

I need not narrate over again the familiar story of how, for once in

his peaceful life, the 'friend of God' girds on his sword and develops

military instincts in his prompt and well-planned pursuit, which show

that if he did not try to conquer some part of the land which he knew

to be his by the will of God, it was not for want of ability, but

because he 'believed God,' and could wait. We all know how he armed his

slaves, and made a swift march to the northern extremity of the land,

and then, by a nocturnal surprise, came down upon the marauders and

scattered them like chaff, before his onset, and recovered Lot and all

the spoil.

Let us learn that, if Christian men will live well apart from the

world, they will be able to sympathise with and help the world; and

that our religion should fit us for the prompt and heroic undertaking,

as it certainly does for the successful accomplishment, of all deeds of

brotherly kindness and sympathy, bringing help and solace to the weak

and the wearied, liberty to the captives, and hope to the despairing.

I do not believe that Christian men have any business to draw swords

now. Abram is in that respect the Old Testament type of a God-fearing

hero, with the actual sword in his hands. The New Testament type of a

Christian warrior without a sword is not one jot less, but more,

heroic. The form of sympathy, help, and 'public spirit' which the 'man

from the other side' displayed is worse than an anachronism now in the

light of Christ's law. It is a contradiction. But the spirit which

breathed through Abram's conduct should be ours. We are bound to 'seek

the peace of the city' where we dwell as strangers and pilgrims,

avoiding no duty of sympathy and help, but by prompt, heroic,

self-forgetting service to all the needy, sorrowful, and oppressed,

building up such characters for ourselves that fugitives and desperate

men shall instinctively turn to men from the other side for that help

which, they know full well, the men of the country are too selfish or

cowardly to give.

May I venture to suggest yet another and very different application of

this name? To the aboriginal inhabitants of heaven, the angels that

kept their first estate, redeemed men are possessors of a unique

experience; and are the 'men from the other side.' They who entered on

their pilgrimage through the Red Sea of conversion, pass out of it

through the Jordan of death. They who become Christ's, by the great

change of yielding their hearts to Him, and who live here as pilgrims

and sojourners, pass dryshod through the stream into His presence. And

there they who have always dwelt in the sunny highlands of the true

Canaan, gather round them, and call them, not unenvying, perhaps, their

experience, 'The men that have crossed.' The 'Hebrews of the Hebrews'

in the heavens are those who have known what it is to be pilgrims and

sojourners, and to whom the promise has been fulfilled in the last hour

of their journey, 'When thou passest through the river, I will be with

thee.' _They_ teach the angels a new song who sing, 'Thou hast led us

through fire and through water, and brought us into a wealthy place.'

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers · 第 83 / 329 题