In 1528 he entered the University of Paris, and there, with

a few associates, in 1534 he projected the new religious

order, which in 1540 was confirmed by the Pope. _The

Constitution of the Order_ and _Spiritual Exercises_ were

written by him in Spanish. The object of these comrades was

to battle for the Church in that time of religious warfare,

to stop the spread of heresy, and especially to stay the

progress of Protestantism and win back those who had

abandoned the old faith. Exempting themselves from the

routine of monastic duties, the members of the new order

were to have freedom for preaching, hearing confessions, and

educating the young.

After considering and abandoning various plans for work

abroad, the band of fathers at last decided to devote

themselves to serving the Church within its own domains, and

the first step was a visit of some members of the fraternity

to Rome for the purpose of obtaining papal confirmation.

Loyola himself, with his chosen colleagues, Faber and Lainez, undertook

the mission to Rome, while the eight others were to disperse themselves

throughout Northern Italy, and especially to gain a footing, if they

could, and to acquire influence at those seats of learning where the

youth of Italy were to be met with; such as Padua, Ferrara, Bologna,

Siena, and Vicenza. Surprising effects resulted, it is said, from these

labors; but we turn toward the three fathers, Ignatius, Lainez, and

Faber, who were now making their way on foot to Rome.

If Loyola's course of secular study, and if his various engagements as

evangelist and as chief of a society, had at all chilled his devotional

ardor, or had drawn his thoughts away from the unseen world, this fervor

and this upward direction of the mind now returned to him in full force:

we are assured that, on this pilgrimage, and "through favor of the

Virgin," his days and nights were passed in a sort of continuous

ecstasy. As they drew toward the city, and while upon the Siena road, he

turned aside to a chapel, then in a ruinous condition, and which he

entered alone. Here ecstasy became more ecstatic still; and, in a

trance, he believed himself very distinctly to see Him whom, as holy

Scripture affirms, "no man hath seen at any time." By the side of this

vision of the invisible appeared Jesus, bearing a huge cross. The Father

presents Ignatius to the Son, who utters the words, so full of meaning,

"I will be favorable to you at Rome."

It is no agreeable task thus to compromise the awful realities of

religion, and thus to perplex the distinctions which a religious mind

wishes to observe between truth and illusion; yet it seems inevitable to

narrate that which comes before us, as an integral and important portion

of the history we have to do with. And yet incidents such as these,

while they will be very far from availing to bring us over as converts

to the system which they are supposed supernaturally to authenticate,

need not generate any extreme revulsion of feeling in an opposite

direction. Good men, ill-trained, or trained under a system which to so

great an extent is factitious, demand from us often, we do not say that

which an enlightened Christian charity does not include, but a something

which is logically distinguishable from it; we mean a philosophic habit

of mind, accustomed to deal with human nature, and with its wonderful

inconsistencies, on the broadest principles.

Some diversities of language present themselves in the narratives that

have come down to us of this vision. In that which, perhaps, is worthy

of the most regard, the phraseology is such as to suggest the belief

that its _exact_ meaning should not easily be gathered from the words.

Loyola had asked of the blessed Virgin, "_ut eum cum filio suo

poneret_"; and during this trance this request, whatever it might mean,

was manifestly granted.

From this vision, and from the memorable words "_Ego vobis Romae

propitius ero_," the society may be said to have taken its formal

commencement, and to have drawn its appellation. Henceforward it was the

"Society of Jesus," for its founder, introduced to the Son of God by the

eternal Father, had been orally assured of the divine favor--favor

consequent upon his present visit to Rome. Here, then, we have exposed

to our view the inner economy or divine machinery of the Jesuit

Institute. The Mother of God is the primary mediatrix; the Father, at

her intercession, obtains for the founder an auspicious audience of the

Son; and the Son authenticates the use to be made of his name in this

instance; and so it is that the inchoate order is to be the "Society of

Jesus."

An inquiry, to which in fact no certain reply could be given, obtrudes

itself upon the mind on an occasion like this; namely, how far the

infidelity and atheism which pervaded Europe in the next and the

following century sprung directly out of profanation such as this?

Merely to narrate them, and to do so in the briefest manner, does

violence to every genuine sentiment of piety. What must have been the

effect produced upon frivolous and sceptical tempers when with sedulous

art such things were put forward as solemn verities not to be

distinguished from the primary truths of religion, and entitled to the

same reverential regard in our minds!

Loyola, although thus warranted, as he thought, in assuming for his

order so peculiar and exclusive a designation, used a discreet reserve

at the first in bringing it forward, lest he should wound the self-love

of rival bodies, or seem to be challenging for his company a superiority

over other religious orders. So much caution as this his experience

would naturally suggest to him; and that he felt the need of it is

indicated by what he is reported to have said as he entered Rome.

Although the words so recently pronounced still sounded in his ear,

"_Ego vobis Romae propitius ero_," yet as he set foot within the city he

turned to his companions and said, with a solemn significance of tone,

"I see the windows shut!"--meaning that they should there meet much

opposition, and find occasion for the exercise of prudence and of

patient endurance of sufferings; of prudence, not less than of patience.

But while care was to be taken not to draw toward themselves the envious

or suspicious regards of the religious orders or of ecclesiastical

potentates, there was even a more urgent need of discretion in avoiding

those occasions of scandal which might spring from their undertaking the

cure of the souls of the other sex. Into what jeopardy of their saintly

reputation had certain eminent men fallen in this very manner; and how

narrowly had they escaped the heaviest imputations! The fathers were not

to take upon themselves the office of confessors to women--"_nisi essent

admodum illustres_." That the risk must necessarily be less, or that

there would be none in the instance of ladies of high rank, is not

conspicuously certain; but if not, what were those special motives which

should warrant the fathers in incurring this peril in such cases? Mere

Christian charity would undoubtedly impel a man to meet danger for the

welfare of the soul of a poor sempstress as readily as for that of a

duchess or the mistress of a monarch. If, therefore, the peril is to be

braved in the one case which ought to be evaded in the other, there must

be present some motive of which Christian charity knows nothing. So

acutely alive was Loyola to the evils that might spring to his order

from this source that we find him at a later period not merely rejecting

ladies, "_admodum illustres_," but bearding the Pope and the cardinals,

and glaringly contravening his own vow of unconditional obedience to the

Vicar of Christ, rather than give way to the solicitations of fair and

noble penitents.

Soon after the arrival of the three--_i.e._, Loyola, Faber, and

Lainez--at Rome, in the year 1537, they obtained an audience of the

Pope, who welcomed their return, and gave anew his sanction to their

endeavors. Faber and Lainez received appointments as theological

professors in the gymnasium; while Loyola addressed himself wholly to

the care of souls and to the reform of abuses. To several persons of

distinction and to some dignitaries of the Church he administered the

discipline of the _Spiritual Exercises_, they, for this purpose,

withdrawing to solitudes in the neighborhood of Rome, where they were

daily conversed with and instructed by himself. At the same time he

labored in hospitals, schools, and private houses to induce repentance

and to cherish the languishing piety of those who would listen to him.

Among such, who fully surrendered their souls to his guidance, were the

Spanish procurator Peter Ortiz and Cardinal Gaspar Contarini, both of

whom were led by him into a course of fervent devotion in which they

persisted, and they, moreover, continued to use their powerful influence

in favor of the infant society.

The pulpits of many of the churches in the several cities where the

fathers had stationed themselves, and some in Rome, had been opened to

their use, and the energy and the freshness of their eloquence affected

the popular mind in an extraordinary manner; sometimes, indeed, they

brought upon themselves violent opposition, but in more frequent

instances, their zeal and patient assiduity triumphing over prejudice,

jealousy, ecclesiastical inertness, and voluptuousness, the tide of

feeling set in with this new impulse, and a commencement was effectively

made of that Catholic revival which spread itself throughout Southern

Europe, turned back the Reformation wave, saved the papacy, and secured

for Christendom the still needed antagonist influence of the Romish and

of the reformed systems of doctrine, worship, and polity.

At Rome, Loyola, by his personal exertions, effected great reforms in

liturgical services--induced a more frequent and devout attention to the

sacraments of confession and the eucharist; established and promoted the

catechetical instruction of youth; and, in a word, restored to Romanism

much of its vitality.

The author and mover of so much healthful change did not escape the

persecutions that are the lot of reformers. Such trials Loyola

encountered, and passed through triumphantly--so we are assured; but in

listening to the Jesuit writers, when telling their own story, where the

credit of the order and the reputation of its founder are deeply

implicated, it is with reservation that we follow them.

So fearful a storm--yet a storm long before descried, it is said, by

Loyola--fell suddenly upon him and his colleagues that it seemed as if

the infant society could by no means resist the impetuous torrent that

assailed it. The populace, as well as persons in authority, suddenly

gave heed to rumors most startling which came in at once from Spain,

from France, and from the North of Italy, and the purport of which was

to throw upon the fathers the most grievous imputations affecting their

personal character as well as their doctrine. These men were reported to

be heretics, Lutherans in disguise, seducers of youth, and men of

flagitious life.

The author or secret mover of this assault is said to have been a

Piedmontese monk of the Augustinian order, himself a secret favorer of

the Lutheran heresy and "a tool of Satan," and who at last, throwing off

the mask, avowed himself a Lutheran. This man, for the purpose of

diverting from himself the suspicions of which his mode of preaching had

made him the object at Rome, raised this outcry against Loyola and his

companions, affirming of them slanderously and falsely what was quite

true as to himself.

The Pope and the court having been absent for some time from Rome, this

disguised heresiarch had seized the opportunity for gaining the ear of

the populace by inveighing against the vices of ecclesiastics, and

insinuating opinions to which he gave a color of truth by citations from

Scripture and the early fathers. Two of Loyola's colleagues, Salmeron

and Lainez, who in their passage through Germany had become skilled in

detecting Lutheran pravity, were deputed to listen to this noisy

preacher; they did so, and reported that the audacious man was, under

some disguise of terms, broaching rank Lutheranism in the very heart of

Rome. Loyola, however, determined to treat the heresiarch courteously,

and therefore sent him privately an admonition to abstain from a course

which occasioned so much scandal, and which could not but afflict

Catholic ears. The preacher took fire at this remonstrance, and openly

attacked those who had dared thus to rebuke him.

Thus attacked, Loyola and his colleagues, on their side, loudly

maintained the great points of Catholic doctrine impugned by this

preacher, such as the merit and necessity of good works, the validity of

religious vows, and the supreme authority of the Church; and in

consequence it became extremely difficult on his part to ward off the

imputation of Lutheranism or to make it appear that he was anything

else than a self-condemned heretic. He, however, so far commanded the

popular mind that he maintained his reputation and his influence, and

actually succeeded in rendering his accusers the objects of almost

universal suspicion or hatred. Their powerful friends forsook them; all

stood aloof, or all but a Spaniard named Garzonio, who, having lodged

Loyola and some of his companions under his roof, knew well their

soundness in the faith and their personal piety. Through his timely

intervention the cardinal-dean of the sacred college was induced to

inform himself, by a personal interview, of their doctrine and life.

This dignitary was satisfied, and more than satisfied, of the innocence

and piety of the fathers. Nevertheless, Loyola, looking far forward, and

knowing well what detriment to his order might arise in remote quarters

from slanders not authoritatively refuted and disallowed, demanded to be

confronted with his accusers before the ecclesiastical authorities. He

would be content with no vague and irregular expression of approval--he

would accept no half acquittal. He sought, and at length obtained, an

official exculpation in the amplest terms, with an acknowledgment of his

orthodoxy on the part of the highest authority on earth, and this was

granted under circumstances that gave it universal notoriety.

In court the principal witness was confounded by proof, under his own

hand, of the falseness of the allegation he had advanced; and at the

same time testimonials from the highest quarters in favor of the

fathers, severally and individually, arrived opportunely; in a word, the

society, in this early and signal instance, triumphed over its

assailants, and thenceforward it occupied a position the most lofty and

commanding in the view of the Catholic world. Loyola and his colleagues

saw the ruin of their adversaries, two of whom, falling into the hands

of the inquisitors, were burned as heretics.

The time was now come for effecting a permanent organization of the

society and for installing a chief at its head. With these purposes in

view, Loyola summoned his colleagues to Rome from the cities of Italy

where they were severally laboring. The fathers being assembled, he

commended to them anew the proposal which they had already accepted, but

which he seemed anxious to fix irrevocably upon their consciences by

often-repeated challenges of the most solemn kind. To impart the more

solemnity to this repetition of their mutual engagements, and to

preclude, by all means, the possibility of retraction, he advised that

several days should be devoted to preliminary prayer and fasting, during

which season each should, with an absolute surrender of himself to the

will of God, await passively the manifestation of that will.

"Heaven," said Loyola to his companions, "heaven has forbidden Palestine

to our zeal--nevertheless that zeal burns with increasing intensity from

day to day. Should we not hence infer that God has called us--not,

indeed, to undertake the conversion of one nation or of a country, but

of all the people and of all the kingdoms of the world?"

Such was the founder's profession and such the limits of his ambition.

The spiritual mechanism which he had devised, and which he was now

putting in movement, intends nothing that is partial or circumscribed;

its very purport is universality; it is absolutism carried out until it

has embraced the human family and has brought every human spirit into

its toils.

But so small a band could hope for no success that should be indicative

of ultimate triumph unless they would surrender themselves individually

to a common will, which should be to each of them as the will of God,

articulately pronounced. After renewing, therefore, the vows of poverty,

of chastity, and of unconditional obedience to the Pope, the fathers

assented to the proposal that one of their number should, by the

suffrages of all, be constituted the superior or general of the order,

and as such be invested with an authority as absolute as it was possible

for man to exercise or for men to submit to. Yet to whose hands should

be assigned--and for life--this irresponsible power over the bodies,

souls, and understandings of his companions?

It had not been until after a lengthened preparation of fasting, prayer,

and night-watching that a resolution so appalling had been formed. Yet

it was easier to consent to the proposal, abstractedly placed before

them, than to yield themselves to all its undefined and irrevocable

consequences, when the awful surrender of what is most precious to

man--his individuality--was to be made, not to a chief unnamed, but to

this or that one among themselves. To whose hands could the ten consign

the irresponsible disposal of their souls and bodies? They had, however,

already advanced too far to recede. They had, as they believed, in

humble imitation of Christ the Lord, offered themselves as a living

sacrifice to God--so far as concerned the body--by the vow of poverty

and the vow of chastity. They had thus immolated the flesh, and had

reserved to themselves nothing of worldly possessions, nothing of

earthly solaces; all had been laid upon the altar. They, had, moreover

professed their willingness to deposit there their very souls. The vow

of unconditional obedience, as thus understood, was a holocaust of the

immortal well-being. Each now, as an offering acceptable to God, was to

pawn his interest in time and eternity, putting the pledge into the

hands of one to be chosen by themselves. It was debated whether this

absolute power should be conferred upon the holder of it for life or for

a term of years only, and whether in the fullest sense it should be

without conditions, or whether it should be limited by constitutional

forms. At length, however, the election of a general for life was

assented to, and especially for this reason--and it is well to note

it--that the new society had been devised and formed for the very

purpose of carrying forward vast designs which must demand a long course

of years for their development and execution; and that no one who must

look forward to the probable termination of his generalship at the

expiration of a few years could be expected to undertake, or to

prosecute with energy, any such far-reaching project. On the contrary,

he should be allowed to believe that the limits of his life alone need

be thought of as bounding his holy ambition. Provisions were made,

however, for holding some sort of control over the individual to whom so

much power was to be intrusted. The actual election of Loyola to the

generalship did not formally take place until after the time when the

order had received pontifical authentication. Meantime, all implicitly

regarded him as their master; from him emanated the acts of the body;

and to him was assigned the task--aided by Lainez--of preparing what

should be the constitutions of the society.

During the interval between the concerted organization of the order and

the formal recognition of Loyola as the general he found several

occasions highly favorable for extending and for enhancing his

influence, as well among the common people as among ecclesiastical

dignitaries. One such opportunity was afforded, soon after the

above-mentioned exculpation of the fathers, by the occurrence of a

famine during an unusually severe winter. The streets of Rome presented

the spectacle of hundreds of half-naked and starving wretches who

fruitlessly implored aid or who silently expired unaided. Loyola and his

colleagues, themselves subsisting from day to day on alms, felt

often--we are told--the nip of hunger, yet they needed no incitement

which these scenes of woe did not spontaneously supply. They were at

once alive to the claims of humanity and to the requirements of

Christian duty. They begged for the perishing, took them to such shelter

as was at their command, carefully and tenderly ministered to the sick,

and, withal, used the advantage which these offices of kindness afforded

them for purposes of religious instruction. Hundreds, rescued from death

through cold and hunger, were thus brought to repentance on the path

which the Church prescribes. A great impression in favor of the Jesuit

fathers was made upon all classes by this course of conduct. In

humanity, self-denying assiduity, and Christian zeal they had

immeasurably surpassed any who might have pretended rivalry with them.

It was now, therefore, that Loyola sought from the Pontiff that formal

recognition which his personal assurances of regard and approval seemed

to show he could not refuse. Paul III was, however, cautious in this

instance, and seemed unwilling to commit himself and the Church at this

critical moment, except so far as he knew himself to be supported by the

feeling and opinion of those of the cardinals whom he most regarded. He

referred Loyola's petition to three of them. The first of these was

Barthelemi Guidiccioni, who had often declared himself to be decisively

opposed to the multiplication of religious orders. The Church, he

thought, had too many of these excrescences already, and, instead of

adding another to the number, he would gladly have reduced them all to

four. His two colleagues were easily induced to concur with him in this

opinion, and thus it appeared as if the infant society, notwithstanding

the advances it had lately made in securing the good opinion of persons

of high rank, as well as in winning popular applause, was little likely

to receive what was indispensable to its permanent establishment--a

papal bull in its favor.

Personally, however, the Pope did not conceal his cordial feeling toward

Loyola and his companions. He seems to have perceived clearly that these

men, resolute in their punctilious adherence to the doctrine and ritual

of the Church, and committed by the most solemn engagements to its

service--deep-purposed as they were, full of a well-governed energy,

resolute in the performance of the most arduous duties, and, moreover,

highly accomplished in secular and sacred learning--were the very

instruments which the Church had need of in this crisis of its fate.

Northern Europe was irrecoverably lost; Germany and Switzerland were

held to Catholicism at points only; while France and Northern Italy were

listening to the seductions of heresy. Scarcely could it be said, even

of Spain, that it was clear of the same infection. The Church ought

then, at such a moment, to embrace cordially, and by all means to favor,

the efforts of men like Loyola and his distinguished companions.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 09 · 第 26 / 37 段