Supposing an original Bantu root, _tanda_, to love; this may become

_tandwa_ . . . . . . . . . . to be loved.

_tandeka_ or _tandika_ . . . to be lovable.

_tandila_ or _tandela_[18] . to love for, with, or by some other person.

_tandiza_ (or _-eza_) \ to cause to love.

_tandisa_ (or _-esa_)[19] / to cause to love.

_tandana_ . . . . . . . . . to love reciprocally.

The suffix _-aka_ or _-anga_ sometimes appears and gives a sense of

continuance to the verbal root. Thus _tanda_ may become _tandaka_ in the

sense of "to continue loving."[20]

The negative verbal particle in the Bantu languages may be traced back to

an original _ka_, _ta_ or _sa_, _ki_, _ti_ or _si_ in the Bantu

mother-tongue. Apparently in the parent language this particle had already

these alternative forms, which resemble those in some West African Negro

languages. In the vast majority of the Bantu dialects at the present day,

the negative particle in the verb (which nearly always coalesces with the

pronominal particle) is descended from this _ka_, _ta_ or _sa_, _ki_, _ti_

or _si_, assuming the forms of _ka_, _ga_, _nga_, _sa_, _ta_, _ha_, _a_,

_ti_, _si_, _hi_, &c. It has coalesced to such an extent in some cases with

the pronominal particle that the two are no longer soluble, and it is only

by the existence of some intermediate forms (as in the _Kongo_ language)

that we are able to guess at the original separation between the two.

Originally the negative particle _ka_, _sa_, &c., was joined to the

pronominal particles, thus:--

_Ka-ngi_ .................... not I.

(Therefore _Ka-ngi tanda_ = not I love.)

_Ka-ku_ or _ka-wu_ .......... not thou.

_Ka-a_ ...................... not he, she.

_Ka-tu_ ..................... not we.

_Ka-nu_ ..................... not ye.

_Ka-ba_ ..................... not they.

In like manner _sa_ would become _sa-ngi_, _sa-wu_, &c. But very early in

the history of Bantu languages _ka-ngi_, or _sa-ngi_, became contracted

into _kai_, _sai_, and finally, _ki_, _si_; _ka-ku_ or _ka-wu_ into _ku_;

and _kaa_ or _saa_ have always been _ka_ or _sa_. Sometimes in the modern

languages the negative particle (such as _ti_ or _si_) is used without any

vestige of a pronoun being attached to it, and is applied indifferently to

all the persons. Occasionally this particle has fallen out of use, and the

negative is expressed (1) by stress or accent; (2) by suffix (traceable to

a root _-pe_ or _-ko_) answering to the French _pas_, and having the same

sense; and (3) by the separate employment of an adverb. If not a few Bantu

languages, the verb used in a negative sense changes its terminal _-a_ to

_-i_. The subjunctive is very frequently formed by changing the terminal

_-a_ to _-e_: thus, tanda = love; -tand_e_ = may love.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--_A Comparative Grammar of South African Languages_ (in two

parts, left unfinished), by Dr W. I. Bleek (London, 1869); _A Sketch of the

Modern Languages of Africa_, by R. N. Cust (1882); _Comparative Grammar of

the South African Bantu Languages_, by Father J. Torrend (1894; mainly

composed on a study of the languages of the Central Zambezi, interesting,

but erroneous in some deductions, and incomplete). In Sir H. H. Johnston's

_The Kilimanjaro Expedition_ (1884), _British Central Africa_ (1898), and

_The Uganda Protectorate_ (1902-1904), there are illustrative vocabularies;

and in _George Grenfell and the Congo_ (1908) the Congo groups of Bantu

speech are carefully classified, also the Fernandian and Cameroon. In the

numerous essays of Carl Meinhof on the original structure of the Bantu

mother-speech, and on existing languages in East and South-East Africa, in

the _Mittheilungen des Seminaers fuer Orientalische Sprachen_, Berlin (also

issued separately through Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1899), and also in his

_Grundzuege einer vergleichenden Grammatik der Bantusprachen_ (Berlin,

1906), a vast amount of valuable information has been collected, but

Meinhof's deductions therefrom are not in every case in accord with those

of other authorities. The _Swahili-English Dictionary_, by Dr L. Krapf

(London, 1882), contains a mass of not well-sorted but invaluable

information concerning the Swahili language as spoken on the coast of East

Africa, especially regarding many words now becoming obsolete. A similar

mine of information is to be found in _An Encyclopaedic Dictionary of the

Mananja_ (Mang'anja) _Language of British Central Africa_, by the Rev.

D. C. Scott (1891). Other admirable works are the _Dictionary of the Congo

Language_, by the Rev. Holman Bentley (1891), and _The Folklore of Angola_,

and a _Grammar of Kimbundu_, by Dr. Heli Chatelain. The many handbooks and

vocabularies written and published by Bishop Steere on the languages of the

East African coast-lands are of great importance to the student, especially

as they give forms of the prefixes now passing out of use. The

_Introductory Handbook of the Yao Language_, by the Rev. Alexander

Hetherwick, illustrates very fully that peculiar and important member of

the East African group. Vocabularies of various Congo languages have been

compiled by Dr. A. Sims; more important works on this subject have been

published by the Rev. W. H. Stapleton (_Comparative Handbook of Congo

Languages_), and by Rev. John Whitehead (_Grammar and Dictionary of the

Bobangi Language_ (London, 1899). E. Torday has illustrated the languages

of the Western Congo basin (_Kwango_, _Kwilu_, northern _Kasai_) in the

_Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute_. There is a treatise on

the _Lunda_ language of the southwestern part of the Belgian Congo, in

Portuguese, by Henrique de Carvalho, who also in his _Ethnographia da

Expedica[o] portugueza [v.03 p.0363] ao Muata Yanvo_ goes deeply into

Bantu language questions. The _Duala_ language of Cameroon, has been

illustrated by the Baptist missionary Saker in his works published about

1860, and since 1900 by German missionaries and explorers (such as

Schuler). The German work on the Duala language is mostly published in the

_Mittheilungen des Seminaers fuer Orientalische Sprachen_ (Berlin); see

also Schuler's _Grammatik des Duala_. The Rev. S. Koelle, in his

_Polyglotta Africana_, published in 1851, gave a good many interesting

vocabularies of the almost unknown north-west Bantu borderland, as well as

of other forms of Bantu speech of the Congo coast and Congo basin. J. T.

Last, in his _Polyglotta Africana Orientalis_, has illustrated briefly many

of the East African dialects and languages, some otherwise touched by no

one else. He has also published an excellent grammar of the _Kaguru_

language of the East African highlands (Usagara). The fullest information

is now extant regarding the languages of _Uganda_ and _Unyoro_, in works by

the missionaries of the Church Missionary Society (Pilkington, Blackledge,

Hattersley, Henry Duta and others). Mr Crabtree, of the same mission, has

collected information regarding the _Masaba_ dialects of Elgon, and these

have also been illustrated by Mr C. W. Hobley, and by Sir H. H. Johnston

(_Uganda Protectorate_), and privately by Mr S. A. Northcote. Mr A. C.

Madan has published works on the _Swahili_ language and on the little-known

_Senga_ of Central Zambezia and _Wisa_ of North-East Rhodesia (Oxford

University Press). Jacottet (Paris, 1902) has in his _Grammaire Subiya_

provided an admirable study of the _Subiya_ and _Luyi_ languages of

Barotseland, and in 1907, Edwin W. Smith (Oxford University Press) brought

out a _Handbook of the Ila Language_ (Mashukulumbwe). The Rev. W. Govan

Robertson is the author of a complete study of the _Bemba_ language. Mrs

Sydney Hinde has illustrated the dialects of _Kikuyu_ and _Kamba_. F. Van

der Burgt has published a _Dictionary of Kirundi_ (the language spoken at

the north end of Tanganyika). _Oci-herero_ of Damaraland has chiefly been

illustrated by German writers, old and new; such as Dr Kolbe and Dr P. H.

Brincker. The northern languages of this Herero group have been studied by

members of the American Mission at Bailundu under the name of _Umbundu_.

Some information on the languages of the south-western part of the Congo

basin and those of south-eastern Angola may be found in the works of

Capello and Ivens and of Henrique de Carvalho and Commander V. L. Cameron.

The British, French and German missionaries have published many

dictionaries and grammars of the different _Secuana_ dialects, notable

amongst which is John Brown's _Dictionary of Secuana_ and Meinhof's _Study

of the T[vs]i-venda_. The grammars and dictionaries of Zulu-Kaffir are

almost too numerous to catalogue. Among the best are Maclaren's _Kafir

Grammar_ and Roberts' _Zulu Dictionary_. The works of Boyce, Appleyard and

Bishop Colenso should also be consulted. Miss A. Werner has written

important studies on the Zulu click-words and other grammatical essays and

vocabularies of the Bantu languages in the _Journal of the African Society_

between 1902 and 1906. The Tebele dialect of Zulu has been well illustrated

by W. A. Elliott in his _Dictionary of the Tebele and Shuna languages_

(London, 1897). The _Ronga_ (_Tonga_, _Si-gwamba_, _Hlengwe_, &c.) are

dealt with in the _Grammaire Ronga_ (Lausanne, 1896) of Henri Junod. Bishop

Smyth and John Mathews have published a vocabulary and short grammar of the

_Xilenge_ (Shilenge) language of Inhambane (_S.P.C.R._, 1902). The journal

_Anthropos_ (Vienna) should also be consulted.

(H. H. J.)

[1] _Bantu_ (literally _Ba-ntu_) is the most archaic and most widely spread

term for "men," "mankind," "people," in these languages. It also indicates

aptly the leading feature of this group of tongues, which is the governing

of the unchangeable root by prefixes. The syllable _-ntu_ is nowhere found

now standing alone, but it originally meant "object," or possibly "person."

It is also occasionally used as a relative pronoun--"that," "that which,"

"he who." Combined with different prefixes it has different meanings. Thus

(in the purer forms of Bantu languages) _muntu_ means "a man," _bantu_

means "men," _kintu_ means "a thing," _bintu_ "things," _kantu_ means "a

little thing," _tuntu_ "little things," and so on. This term _Bantu_ has

been often criticized, but no one has supplied a better, simpler

designation for this section of Negro languages, and the name has now been

definitely consecrated by usage.

[2] In Luganda and other languages of Uganda and the Victoria Nyanza, and

also in Runyoro on the Victoria Nile, the word for "fowl" is _enkoko_. In

Ki-Swahili of Zanzibar it is _kuku_. In Zulu it is _inkuku_. In some of the

Cameroon languages it is _lokoko_, _ngoko_, _ngok_, and on the Congo it is

_nkogo_, _nsusu_. On the Zambezi it is _nkuku_; so also throughout the

tribes of Lakes Nyasa and Tanganyika, and most dialects of South Africa.

[3] From this statement are excepted those tongues classified as

"semi-Bantu." In some languages of the Lower Niger and of the Gold Coast

the word for "fowl" is generally traceable to a root _kuba_. This form

_kuba_ also enters the Cameroon region, where it exists alongside of

_-koko_. _Kuba_ may have arisen independently, or have been derived from

the Bantu _kuku_.

[4] Whence the many _nyanza_, _nyanja_, _nyasa_, _mwanza_, of African

geography.

[5] In using the forms Uganda, Unyoro, the writer accepts the popular

mis-spelling. These countries should be called Buganda and Bunyoro, and

their languages Luganda and Runyoro.

[6] It is an important and recently discovered fact (delineated in the work

of the Baptist missionaries and of the Austrian traveller Dr. Franz

Thonner) that the Congo at its northern and north-eastern bend, between the

Rubi river and Stanley Falls, lies outside the Bantu field. The _Bondonga_

and _Wamanga_ languages are not Bantu. They are allied to the _Mbuba-Momfu_

of the Ituri and Nepoko, and also to the _Mundu_ of the Egyptian Sudan. The

Mundu group extends westward to the Ubangi river, as far south as 3deg 30'

N. See _George Grenfell and the Congo_, by Sir Harry Johnston; and _Dans la

Grande Foret de l'Afrique equatoriale_, by Franz Thonner (1899).

[7] These features are characteristic of almost all the Negro languages of

Africa.

[8] This does not preclude the _aspiration_ of consonants, or the

occasional local change of a palatal into a guttural.

[9] As already mentioned, a somewhat similar concord is also present as

regards the _suffixes_ of the Fula and the Kiama (_Tem_) languages in

Western Africa, and as regards the _prefixes_ of the Timne language of

Sierra Leone; it exists likewise in Hottentot and less markedly in many

Aryan, Semitic and Hamitic tongues.

[10] An apparent but not a real exception to this rule is in the second

person plural of the imperative mood, where an abbreviated form of the

pronoun is _affixed_ to the verb. Other phases of the verb may be

occasionally emphasized by the repetition of the governing pronoun at the

end.

[11] The full hypothetical forms of the prefixes as joined with definite

articles--_Ngumu_, _Mbaba_, _Ngimi_, _Ngama_ and so on--are added in

brackets. Forms very like these are met with still in the Mt. Elgon

languages (Group No. 3) and in _Subiya_ group (No. 32).

[12] This is prominently met with in East Africa, and also in the various

Bechuana dialects of Central South Africa, where it takes the form of _n_

at the end of words.

[13] Or perhaps _nga-ba-ntu_ (afterwards _na-ba-_, _aba-_); the form

_ngabantu_ is actually met with in Zulu-Kaffir: also _ngumuntu_.

[14] Likewise _ba-_ may have meant "two" (Bantu root _Bali_ = two); a dual

first and then a plural.

[15] _Wa-_ in Luganda. In Lusoga (north coast of Victoria Nyanza) _Wa-_

becomes _[Gamma]a_ (_Gha_).

[16] _Mi_ is possibly a softening of _ngi_, _ni_; _ngi_ becomes in some

dialects _nji_, _ndi_, _ni_ or _mbi_; there is in some of the coast

Cameroon languages, and in the north-eastern Congo, a word _mbi_, _mba_ for

"I," "me," which seems to be borrowed from the Sudanian Mundu tongues. The

possessive pronoun for the first person is devired from two forms, _-ami_

and _-angi_ (_-am_, _-angu_, _-anji_, _-ambi_, &c.).

[17] An exception to this rule is the verbal particle _li_ or _di_, which

means "to be."

[18] Or _-ira_, _-era_.

[19] This form may also appear as _[vs]a_, as for instance _aka_--to be on

fire becomes _a[vs]a_, to set on fire.

[20] In choosing this common root _tanda_, and applying it to the above

various terminations, the writer is not prepared to say that it is

associated with all of them in any one Bantu language. Although _tanda_ is

a common verb in Zulu, it has not in Zulu _all_ these variations, and in

some other language where it may by chance exhibit all the variations its

own form is changed to _londa_ or _randa_.

BANVILLE, THEODORE FAULLAIN DE (1823-1891), French poet and miscellaneous

writer, was born at Moulins in the Bourbonnais, on the 14th of March 1823.

He was the son of a captain in the French navy. His boyhood, by his own

account, was cheerlessly passed at a lycee in Paris; he was not harshly

treated, but took no part in the amusements of his companions. On leaving

school with but slender means of support, he devoted himself to letters,

and in 1842 published his first volume of verse (_Les Cariatides_), which

was followed by _Les Stalactites_ in 1846. The poems encountered some

adverse criticism, but secured for their author the approbation and

friendship of Alfred de Vigny and Jules Janin. Henceforward Banville's life

was steadily devoted to literary production and criticism. He printed other

volumes of verse, among which the _Odes funambulesques_ (Alencon, 1857)

received unstinted praise from Victor Hugo, to whom they were dedicated.

Later, several of his comedies in verse were produced at the Theatre

Francais and on other stages; and from 1853 onwards a stream of prose

flowed from his industrious pen, including studies of Parisian manners,

sketches of well-known persons (_Camees parisiennes_, &c.), and a series of

tales (_Contes bourgeois_, _Contes heroiques_, &c.), most of which were

republished in his collected works (1875-1878). He also wrote freely for

reviews, and acted as dramatic critic for more than one newspaper.

Throughout a life spent mainly in Paris, Banville's genial character and

cultivated mind won him the friendship of the chief men of letters of his

time. He was also intimate with Frederick-Lemaitre and other famous actors.

In 1858 he was decorated with the legion of honour, and was promoted to be

an officer of the order in 1886. He died in Paris on the 15th of March

1891, having just completed his sixty-eighth year. Banville's claim to

remembrance rests mainly on his poetry. His plays are written with

distinction and refinement, but are deficient in dramatic power; his

stories, though marked by fertility of invention, are as a rule

conventional and unreal. Most of his prose, indeed, in substance if not in

manner, is that of a journalist. His lyrics, however, rank high. A careful

and loving student of the finest models, he did even more than his greater

and somewhat older comrades, Victor Hugo, Alfred de Musset and Theophile

Gautier, to free French poetry from the fetters of metre and mannerism in

which it had limped from the days of Malherbe. In the _Odes funambulesques_

and elsewhere he revived with perfect grace and understanding the _rondeau_

and the _villanelle_, and like Victor Hugo in _Les Orientales_, wrote

_pantoums_ (pantuns) after the Malay fashion. He published in 1872 a _Petit

traite de versification francaise_ in exposition of his metrical methods.

He was a master of delicate satire, and used with much effect the difficult

humour of sheer bathos, happily adapted by him from some of the early

folk-songs. He has somewhat rashly been compared to Heine, whom he

profoundly admired; but if he lacked the supreme touch of genius, he

remains a delightful writer, who exercised a wise and sound influence upon

the art of his generation.

Among his other works may be mentioned the poems, _Idylles prussiennes_

(1871), and _Trente-six ballades joyeuses_ (1875); the prose tales, _Les

Saltimbanques_ (1853); _Esquisses parisiennes_ (1859) and _Contes

feeriques_; and the plays, _Le Feuilleton d'Aristophane_ (1852),

_Gringoire_ (1866), and _Deidamia_ (1876).

See also J. Lemaitre, _Les Contemporains_ (first series, 1885);

Sainte-Beuve, _Causeries du lundi_, vol. xiv.; Maurice Spronck, _Les

Artistes litteraires_ (1889).

(C.)

BANYAN, or BANIAN (an Arab corruption, borrowed by the Portuguese from the

Sanskrit _vanij_, "merchant"), the _Ficus Indica_, or _Bengalensis_, a tree

of the fig genus. The name was originally given by Europeans to a

particular tree on the Persian Gulf beneath which some Hindu "merchants"

had built a pagoda. In Calcutta the word was once generally applied to a

native broker or head clerk in any business or private house, now usually

known as sircar. _Bunya_, a corruption of the word common in Bengal

generally, is usually applied to the native grain-dealer. Early writers

sometimes use the term generically for all Hindus in western India.

_Banyan_ was long Anglo-Indian for an undershirt, in allusion to the body

garment of the Hindus, especially the Banyans.

_Banyan days_ is a nautical slang term. In the British navy there were

formerly two days in each week on which meat formed no part of the men's

rations. These were called banyan days, in allusion to the vegetarian diet

of the Hindu merchants. _Banyan hospital_ also became a slang term for a

hospital for animals, in reference to the Hindu's humanity and his dislike

of taking the life of any animal.

BAOBAB, _Adansonia digitata_ (natural order _Bombaceae_), a native of

tropical Africa, one of the largest trees known, its stem reaching 30 ft.

in diameter, though the height is not great. It has a large woody fruit,

containing a mucilaginous pulp, with a pleasant cool taste, in which the

seeds are buried. The bark yields a strong fibre which is made into ropes

and woven into cloth. The wood is very light and soft, and the trunks of

living trees are often excavated to form houses. The name of the genus was

given by Linnaeus in honour of Michel Adanson, a celebrated French botanist

and traveller.

BAPHOMET, the imaginary symbol or idol which the Knights Templars were

accused of worshipping in their secret rites. The term is supposed to be a

corruption of _Mahomet_, who in several medieval Latin poems seems to be

called by this name. J. von Hammer-Purgstall, in his _Mysterium Baphometis

relevatum, &c._, and _Die Schuld der Templer_, revived the old charge

against the Templars. The word, according to his interpretation, signifies

the baptism of _Metis_, or of fire, and is, therefore, connected with the

impurities of the Gnostic Ophites (_q.v._). Additional [v.03 p.0364]

evidence of this, according to Hammer-Purgstall, is to be found in the

architectural decorations of the Templars' churches.

An elaborate criticism of Hammer-Purgstall's arguments was made in the

_Journal des Savans_, March and April 1819, by M. Raynouard, a well-known

defender of the Templars. (See also Hallam, _Middle Ages_, c. i. note 15.)

BAPTISM. The Gr. words [Greek: baptismos] and [Greek: baptisma] (both of

which occur in the New Testament) signify "ceremonial washing," from the

verb [Greek: baptizo], the shorter form [Greek: bapto] meaning "dip"

without ritual significance (_e.g._ the finger in water, a robe in blood).

That a ritual washing away of sin characterized other religions than the

Christian, the Fathers of the church were aware, and Tertullian notices, in

his tract _On Baptism_ (ch. v.), that the votaries of Isis and Mithras were

initiated _per lavacrum_, "through a font," and that in the _Ludi

Apollinares et Eleusinii_, _i.e._ the mysteries of Apollo and Eleusis, men

were baptized (_tinguntur_, Tertullian's favourite word for baptism), and,

what is more, baptized, as they presumed to think, "unto regeneration and

exemption from the guilt of their perjuries." "Among the ancients," he

adds, "anyone who had stained himself with homicide went in search of

waters that could purge him of his guilt."

The texts of the New Testament relating to Christian baptism, given roughly

in chronological order, are the following:--

A.D. 55-60, Rom. vi. 3, 4; 1 Cor. i. 12-17, vi. 11, x. 1-4, xii. 13, xv.

29; Gal. iii. 27.

A.D. 60-65, Col. ii. 11, 12; Eph. iv. 5, v. 26.

A.D. 60-70, Mark x. 38, 39.

A.D. 80-90, Acts i. 5, ii. 38-41, viii. 16, 17, x. 44-48, xix. 1-7, xxii.

16; 1 Pet. iii. 20, 21; Heb. x. 22.

A.D. 90-100, John iii. 3-8, iii. 22, iii. 26, iv. 1, 2.

Uncertain, Matt, xxviii. 18-20; Mark xvi. 16.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Banks" to "Bassoon" Volume 3, Part 1, Slice 3 · 第 14 / 30 题