law, which limits the Cadet Corps of the United States Army to one cadet
for each Congressional District in the several States, one for each
Territory, one for the District of Columbia, and to forty more, whom the
President may appoint, ten each year, from the country at large, without
reference to their residence. Under this law, if each Congressional
District and Territory were represented, the whole number of cadets
would be two hundred and eighty, but owing to vacancies by withdrawal or
non-appointment in Congressional Districts in the States involved in the
rebellion, the number at this time is reduced to less than two
hundred--and the graduating class of 1863, to twenty-five--a number
altogether inadequate for the regular army in time of peace, and much
below the present and future exigences of the service, while the expense
of the Academy remains the same. We are assured by the Superintendent
that without any additional expense for building and material equipment,
and with a small advance in the pay of pupils and assistant teachers,
the Cadet Corps could be increased to four hundred. The Visitors are
unanimously of the opinion that the corps should be at once increased to
this number, and should be maintained at this maximum at all times, by
authorizing the President to appoint to any vacancy which may remain
unfilled for three months by reason of nullification, secession,
rebellion, or any other cause. If the appointments to fill and maintain
the Corps at this maximum, can be selected out of the many American
youths, ambitious to serve their country in the army, on the plan of an
open competitive examination in the several States, the Visitors believe
that ninety out of every one hundred thus appointed will go through the
whole course with honor, and the average ability, scholarship, and good
conduct of the whole corps, will equal that now reached by the first ten
of each class.
2. By the original law providing for the appointment of cadets to the
corps of Artillerists and Engineers, and by the act of 1812, by which
the Military Academy was made to consist of the Corps of Engineers, the
candidates for cadets were to be “not under the age of fourteen, nor
above the age of twenty-one years.” By regulations of the Department the
minimum age is fixed at sixteen years, and the Visitors believe that the
interests of the Academy and the military service, will be promoted by
making the legal age for admission between eighteen and twenty-one
years. The four years preceding and including eighteen are peculiarly
the formative period of the body, mind, and character, and should be
devoted to the acquisition of right habits of study and general culture,
as the proper foundation for all special and professional training,
which should not be commenced until the constitution is consolidated,
the taste for a pursuit is distinctly pronounced, and the moral
character is naturally developed under the influences and supervision of
home. The experience of Europe, and particularly of France and England,
has led to the abandonment of juvenile military schools, as nurseries
for officers; and the very common practice of nominating candidates who
exceed the legal age, expresses the convictions of our own people that
military studies now require more maturity of mind than was deemed
necessary in the early history of the Academy. The present want of
uniformity as to age and mental discipline explains in part, the wide
disparity of attainments between members of the same class. With few
brilliant exceptions, confined to cadets of rare aptitude and vigor of
mind, the most solid practical education is obtained by those who come
to West Point when at least eighteen years of age, with at least a good
preparation in English studies, and a taste for mathematical and
military pursuits.
3. The school attainments required by law of candidates for admission to
the Military Academy, are as rudimentary and limited as our language can
express--far below, we are assured, the requisitions of any similar
school in the world. Prior to 1812, when the Academy was little more
than a school of mathematics, taught by two professors, in the line of
geometrical and algebraical demonstrations, and the practical exercises
were confined to surveying, and the simplest forms of military
construction, the candidates were not subjected to any examination. The
act of 1812, provides that “each candidate previously to his
appointment, shall be well versed in reading, writing, and arithmetic,”
and by regulations of the department, the knowledge of arithmetic is
restricted to only a portion of that science. There were special reasons
at the start for thus limiting the amount of knowledge, when the minimum
age of admission was fixed at fourteen years, and the Academy was
properly a juvenile military school, like all cadet schools in Europe at
that time. At that date, science entered far less than now into the art
of war, as applied to the means and modes of attack as well as of
defense. Besides, the opportunities of even elementary instruction were
then far less widely or equally distributed through all the States than
now, when the general government has set apart over sixty million acres
of the best land in aid of primary schools in all the new States, and
nearly every State legislature has subjected the entire property of
their several communities to taxation for the support of public
instruction. Now that the requirement as to age has been advanced from
the fourteenth to the sixteenth year, and by the voluntary action of
parties having the nomination, or seeking the appointment, to the
eighteenth year, we see no reason why the school attainments
corresponding to, and compatible with that age, should not be also
required. The least that should be demanded of any candidate is that
amount of general culture and attainments, which constitutes a good
English education, and which it is now the aim of the public schools,
and their boast, to give without partiality, to all, poor and rich
alike, if the advantages they proffer are properly improved. And we see
no injustice in fixing the standard of general attainments and culture
as high as that now reached by cadets in good standing at the close of
their first year in this Academy, including even an elementary knowledge
of one modern language. If the French, or Spanish, or German language is
to be mastered by American officers for the sake of the military science
and literature which it embodies, or its uses in conversation, or
official duty, called for by the exigences of our foreign relations,
both in peace and war, its acquisition should be begun as early in life
as possible, while the organs of speech are flexible, and the
grammatical and etymological difficulties of a new language are more
readily surmounted. Judging from the results of the examinations we have
witnessed here, and what we know of the attainments made by students in
colleges elsewhere, very few persons, who begin the study of modern
languages, late in their school life, in the pressure of other studies,
ever attain the mastery of even one, so as to be able to use it as an
instrument of written or spoken communication, or make its treasures of
science and literature a familiar possession.
Whatever may be thought of the disciplinary and practical value of
earlier and longer attention to one or more modern languages, to those,
whose minds will otherwise be almost exclusively subjected to the
peculiar training of the mathematics, there can be no doubt that young
men who have reached the age of eighteen, and desire to profit by the
special studies of a purely military school, should exhibit in their
language, habits, and attainments that intellectual, moral, and
esthetical culture, which the public or private schools of any State
can, and should give to any youth of average ability of that age.
4. Low as the requirements for admission now are, from a defective and
vicious mode, as we believe, of selecting candidates, and making
appointments to the Cadet Corps, the number of candidates nominated and
provisionally appointed, who present themselves at West Point and shrink
from any examination, or who fail to pass even the entrance examination
which is confined to reading a few passages of familiar English prose or
verse, and writing a few sentences from dictation, and performing on the
blackboard a few operations of the most elementary character in
arithmetic,--or being admitted, are not able to gain or keep a
respectable standing for one year, although the studies of the first
year belong to a general, and not a military education,--or by a
“special providence,” manage just to escape dismission from
incompetency, and graduate,--is disgracefully large. The country abounds
in youth, competent to master and profit by the course of instruction
here provided, and ambitious of enjoying these privileges of education,
and opportunities of distinction; and a selection by lot from the
juvenile population of any state, could not result in so few prizes, and
such a dreary waste of blanks as have been realized from the
appointments made, in the necessary absence of all personal knowledge of
the candidates by the appointing power, on the recommendation, or
nomination of one or more persons in each Congressional District, in no
way responsible for the incompetency of the individuals named.
From official tables prepared from the records of the Academy,[14] it
appears that the proportion of all who graduate, to all appointed in
successive periods of ten years, is as follows:
For Ten Years, from 1802 to 1811, 0.606
“ “ “ 1812 to 1821, 0.289
“ “ “ 1822 to 1831, 0.377
“ “ “ 1832 to 1841, 0.472
“ “ “ 1842 to 1851, 0.510
“ “ “ 1852 to 1861, 0.523
[Footnote 14: See Boynton’s “History of Military Academy at West
Point,” p. 293.]
From official returns furnished by the Superintendent, a portion of
which are hereto appended, (B. C.) it appears that out of 4626 who have
been admitted to the Corps of Cadets, (including two hundred new
members,) only 2020 were able to graduate, and of those who failed,
(2398, excluding those who remain,) more than three-fifths broke down in
the first year in studies which in almost every military and scientific
school in Europe are required for admission. Out of the whole number
regularly nominated, recommended, and provisionally appointed from 1841
to 1863, more than twenty per cent. failed to pass the examination, as
to health and constitution, or the slight examination in reading,
writing, and ciphering. And this proportion would be increased by the
number who withdrew in advance from the consciousness of their unfitness
for a position to which ambitious and influential friends had promoted
them. Out of the whole number admitted from 1851 to 1862, more than
one-third failed during their first year. The proportion of graduates to
the whole number admitted is 46 per cent. and of those who failed to
graduate, 54 per cent.
The Visitors are unanimously of opinion that in a matter of such vital
importance as the right organization and command of the armies of the
United States, on which the honor and safety of the whole country
depend, the original appointment to the Cadet Corps which is the _first
step_ in promotion to such command, as well as to all the special duties
which attach to the engineer service, should not be made in any case
except on the principle of finding the best youth for the place--having
the health, character, vigor of body, maturity and aptitude of mind, and
preparatory knowledge, to profit by the opportunities of the special
military training provided by the government for this corps, and a
decided taste and expressed desire for a military career. And to this
end, the law and regulations should provide for the rigorous exclusion
in advance of all who can not present testimonials from the teachers
under whose instruction they have been for the two years next previous,
that in their opinion they possess the qualifications above specified,
and who do not make a written declaration of their desire to enter the
Corps for the purpose of qualifying themselves to labor in the military
service of the government, to which they will bear true allegiance
against all enemies foreign and domestic, and over all state and local
authority, government and constitution whatever. To select the best out
of any number who may present their testimonials and written
declarations, public examination should be held of all applicants at
such times and places as the law should prescribe, by such persons and
under such regulations as the Department shall be authorized to appoint;
and the results of such examination of each person examined, and in each
subject specified by law, should be returned to the Department, in which
return the applicants should be arranged in the order of merit. From
this merit roll, revised from year to year, all appointments to the
Cadet Corps should be made, and in the order of merit as assigned by the
examiners.
This principle of appointment and promotion by merit which we advocate,
is in full and successful operation in the classification and
advancement of cadets in the Academy itself, and the country will be
satisfied if the same principle can be as fairly and rigorously enforced
on all who aspire to enter, as well as on all promotions in the service
after leaving the institution. The principle itself, of selection by
merit, either in the mode of public examination, or of careful and
searching inquiry by competent and impartial educators, designated for
this purpose by the parties to whom custom and not law had assigned the
grave responsibility of nominating candidates, has been voluntarily
applied in several Congressional Districts. Not a cadet known to have
been thus selected and appointed, has ever broken down from want of
vigor of body or mind, or failed to reach and maintain an honorable
position on the merit roll of the Academy; and to this careful selection
by those who felt the responsibility of the privilege accorded to them,
is the country indebted for its most eminent and useful officers.
To the objection that selection by public competitive examination, will
involve expense, we reply, that any expense which will do away with the
prejudices against the Academy, which the present system of patronage
has done so much directly and indirectly to evoke and foster, and which
will, at the same time, exclude incompetent, and secure the services of
vigorous, talented, well trained officers, for every arm of the service,
will be well incurred. But, in our opinion, there will be no more
expense in selecting and educating a given number of cadets on this
plan, than on the present. The two thousand cadets who were appointed by
patronage and failed to graduate, cost the government, directly and
indirectly each year, a much larger sum than it would have taken to have
excluded them in advance from the institution by competitive
examination, and filling their places by better men; and their exclusion
by substituting better material, would have been an incalculable gain to
the Academy, facilitating its discipline, increasing the value of its
instruction, and giving to the army a larger number of competent
officers.
The objection, that the mode of making all appointments by open
competitive examination, will deprive the President, and members of
Congress of the opportunity of appointing the sons of meritorious
officers, or poor, and it may be, orphan boys of genius--is more
plausible than real. That such appointments have been made, to the
manifest advantage of the country, is certain. But we know not a single
instance of such marked success, on the part of a cadet thus appointed,
as to attract investigation, where the same youth would not have secured
the appointment in open competition. But if he had failed, and the place
had been filled by one better qualified, the country would have been no
loser, and he would have suffered no injustice or neglect. We fear, from
an abuse of this amiable motive of rewarding meritorious parents, and
assisting the poor, that in some instances, weak, ignorant, and
incompetent persons are appointed, as though this Academy were a public
charity school, or home for orphans; and not a special school for
military instruction and training, for which the great object, in any
mode of appointment, is to select those who will profit most by its
advantages, and do the country the greatest service after being thus
educated at its expense.
To the objections that, in these examinations, “the most forward boys
will have the best chance, and such boys seldom make the best men,” and
that no amount of book knowledge can give assurance of the great
military genius, “which must be born and not made,” we reply, that these
objections apply just as forcibly to any plan of nomination, and to
every system of instruction. But we believe that those examinations can
be and will be so conducted as to distinguish what is precocious from
what is the healthy development of the faculties, what is solid from
what is showy in attainments, what is vigor, grasp and aptitude of mind
from what is mere memory and quickness, in competing candidates. All of
these candidates must bring the testimonials of their former teachers,
as to their character, ability and attainments, must have reached the
age of eighteen years, and will be called upon to exhibit orally as well
as in writing their knowledge and opinions on subjects which require
judgment, reflection, presence of mind and decision. If a young man of
eighteen and upward shows that he has done well what he had undertaken
to do thus far in life, that he has preserved a sound constitution in
vigorous health, has mastered the studies appropriate to his age, is
honest, diligent, thoughtful, teachable, courageous, courteous, and
ambitious of excellence generally, then the country has every assurance
which can be given that on this basis of character, talents,
attainments, and application, a solid fabric of military education can
be reared, and that in the hour of trial he will show not only courage
to dare, but competence to devise, influence and command. In the
responsibilities of such an hour will be found the fruitage of all his
previous promise and preparation.
To the objection--“that a competitive examination must always result in
the success of the best instructed, wholly irrespective of the capacity
of the competing candidates; and the plan will thus secure for the
country the services of dull mediocrity well instructed, and exclude
genius without opportunities of development,”--we reply, that this does
occur now under the present system, but need not, and never has been the
result of competitive examination properly conducted. The examination
which we propose to have inaugurated, is not to search simply or mainly
for the results of memory or diligence, but for “vigor and aptitude of
mind” in reference to the special purposes of this Academy. The
examination will be poorly conducted, and will operate here widely
differently than elsewhere, if it does not only exclude in advance
palpable incompetency, and ascertain beyond doubt the possession by all
the successful candidates, of that knowledge which is the basis of a
special military training, but also seek, and give credit in the result,
for the quick eye, the firm set mouth, the vigor and elasticity of body,
the rapid decision, the contempt of danger, the competency to influence
and command--and all the other marks of the incipient soldier and
officer, as well as the mathematical tastes and qualities of mind which
indicate the successful engineer. Composed as every Examination
Commission might be, of at least one experienced officer of the United
States Army, of one member (past or present,) of the Academic Board, of
one officer of the State Militia, as well as one or more experts in
educational matters, the military qualities of body, character and mind,
will be sought for as well as the mere results of memory, diligence and
good opportunities of instruction, in the competing candidates.
To the objection, that candidates will make special preparation, and in
the phraseology of the class-room, “cram for the occasion,” we
reply,--to such preparation and cramming as cover the whole ground of a
good English education, we can see no possible objection; the more of
it, the better. If the preparation is only crude and on the surface, we
are sure that the ploughshare of interrogation requiring precise
answers, oral and written, will very soon expose its superficial and
undigested character.
To the sifting out and selection by open competition, might be added a
period of probation for the successful candidates--making their first
year’s connection with the academy a further test of capacity,
preparation, and aptitude for a military career. No pains and no expense
should be spared to exclude from the academy and the service,
incompetent, indifferent, and unteachable cadets and officers; such men
are “cumberers of the ground,” and no influence and inertia should be
potent enough to resist the inevitable working of the principle of open
competition, applied at frequent intervals, and at every stage of
promotion, in getting rid of such cadets and officers.
The fact that such a public examination is to be held from year to year,
and that the educational privileges of this Academy, and immediate and
prospective promotion in the army are the prizes which await success,
will, in five years call forth more latent genius in the obscure corners
and poor families of a State, than has ever been sought out by the
lantern of patronage, (which is now seldom carried beyond the family, or
neighborhood, or party of the person having the nomination,) since the
foundation of the Academy. With the network of public and elementary
schools, woven by state legislation over all the land--with public
schools of a higher grade, and special schools of science and the arts
already established, at short intervals, or which will be called into
existence by the demand for a higher and different preparation from that
now given, it may be safely said, that no genius, likely to attract the
attention of a member of Congress, will exist, which will not be
developed under the same influences by which the “dull mediocrity” of
the rest of the community will be educated. Once set in the path of
instruction and development, real genius will assert its own claims to
attention, and will, on a first or second trial, before any board of
examiners, make its vigor, courage, and persistence felt. The result
will be the same in this institution, as in every really good Public
High School and Free Academy--all classes as to wealth, occupation,
religious and political affinities will be represented,--provided the
regulations are judicious, and the examination practical and impartial.
This is the experience of the competitive principle in France ever since
it was inaugurated by Carnot in the Polytechnic School at Paris, and
Napoleon extended its application to every public special school, and to
promotion in every department of administration, civil as well as
military. And where is there more general administrative ability,
central and local? Where are abler or better trained officers, military
and civil, to be found? Where does “well instructed mediocrity,” no
matter how well backed up by wealth, find less favor, or genius for
organization and command, no matter how poor or unfriended, find such
speedy and sure recognition?
The experience of England in the trial of the two principles of
patronage and competitive examination for admission, not only to the
military and naval schools, but to the East India and the Civil service
generally, is instructive, and especially on the points which we are now
considering. Prior to the Crimean war, (which exposed the utter
incompetency of a large number of officers, who had obtained their
military education and promotion by patronage and purchase,)--admission
to the Royal Military Academy at Woolwich, was by nomination, and the
age fixed by law, was fourteen years.
The Secretary of War was satisfied by personal inquiry in 1855, that
nothing could do so much to narrow and cramp the full development of a
boy’s mind, as his long confinement from so early an age among lads
having the same limited attainments, special studies, and
destination;--that a majority of those admitted on nomination and
through influential friends, had only the minimum qualifications
specified by law;--that to most cadets the severer studies were irksome
and imperfectly mastered, on account of immaturity of mind and imperfect
preparation;--that the certainty of promotion by influence and purchase,
after obtaining the diploma of the Academy, and not unfrequently without
it, took away all stimulus for continued study;--that resignations were
common, when the profession of arms ceased to be a pastime, or could be
exchanged for something that paid better--and the service was incumbered
by officers without large and trained capacity for command, although not
deficient in courage and dash. Under these circumstances the Secretary
of War, advanced the minimum age of candidates from fourteen to eighteen
years, removed all the general studies of the Academy into the
preparatory course, and opened the doors of admission to those only, who
could prove their title to enter by personal merit, in a free
competitive examination. The same principle was applied to appointments
and promotion in the new regiments called for by the exigences of the
great war in which England found herself engaged.
Subjects, time, and places of examination, were officially made known
throughout the kingdom, and commissions to conduct the examinations were
appointed, composed of men of good common sense, military officers, and
eminent practical teachers and educators. The results as stated in a
debate in Parliament, five years later, on extending this principle to
all public schools, and to all appointments and promotions in every
department of the public service, were as follows:--In the competitive
examinations for admission to the Royal Military Academy, candidates
from all classes of society appeared--sons of merchants, attorneys,
clergymen, mechanics, and noblemen, and among the successful
competitors, every class was represented. Among the number was the son
of a mechanic in the arsenal at Woolwich, and the son of an earl, who
was at the time a Cabinet Minister--the graduates of National Schools,
and the students of Eton, and other great Public Schools. The most
successful candidates were between the ages of eighteen and nineteen, as
is found to be the case in competitions for admission to the Polytechnic
School of France. Out of 579 successful candidates for the latter,
between 1854 and 1857, 450 were over eighteen years. But the most
important result of the competitive examinations for Woolwich, was the
superior mental ability, the vigorous health, and eagerness for study
exhibited by the new classes, and the small number who have failed on
account of ill-health or incompetency. On this point, Mr. Edward
Chadwick, in a Report before the National Social Science Association, at
Cambridge, in 1862, says:--
“Out of an average three hundred patronage appointed cadets at the Royal
Military Academy at Woolwich, for officers of engineers and the
artillery, during the five years preceding the adoption of the principle
of open competition for admission to the Academy, there were fifty, who
were after long and indulgent trial, and with a due regard to
influential parents and patrons, dismissed for hopeless incapacity for
the service of those scientific corps. During the five subsequent years,
which have been years of the open competition principle, there has not
been one dismissed for incapacity. Moreover, the general standard of
capacity has been advanced. An eminent professor of this university who
has taught as well under the patronage as under the competitive system
at that Academy, declares that the quality of mind of the average of the
cadets, has been improved by the competition, so much so, that he
considers that the present average quality of mind of the cadets
there,--though the sorts of attainment are different, has been brought
up to the average of the first classmen of this (Cambridge) university,
which of itself is a great gain. Another result, the opposite to that
which was confidently predicted, by the opponents to the principle, has
been that the average physical power or bodily strength, instead of
being diminished, is advanced beyond the average of their predecessors.”
The opening of the Royal Military School at Woolwich to competition, on
the basis of a more advanced age, and more thorough general education,
has not only drawn in pupils of higher average ability and attainments,
but has enabled the authorities to extend the course of instruction. In
this, the only safe way, they solved the problem which has tortured the
ingenuity of the friends of our Academy--of crowding new studies
acknowledged to be desirable if not indispensable, into a course already
too crowded for cadets so unequally, and, many of them, so imperfectly
prepared for the course as it is.
Another result of immense importance to the educational interests of
Great Britain has followed the introduction of these open competitive
examinations for appointments to the Military and Naval Schools, to the
East India service, as well as to fill vacancies in the principal
clerkships in the War, Admiralty, Ordnance and Home Departments of the
government:--a stimulus of the most healthy and powerful kind, worth
more than millions of pecuniary endowment, has been given to all the
great schools of the country, including the universities of England,
Scotland and Ireland. As soon as it was known that candidates, graduates
of Trinity College, Dublin, had succeeded over competitors from Oxford
and Edinburgh in obtaining valuable appointments in the East India
service--the professors in the latter universities began to look to
their laurels. As soon as it was known to the master of any important
school, that some of his leading pupils might compete in these
examinations, and that his own reputation as a teacher depended in a
measure on the success or failure of these pupils, he had a new motive
to impart the most vigorous and thorough training to his whole school.
The success of candidates who had never seen the inside of a government
Military School, in open competition for appointments to the Artillery
and Engineer Corps, in the new regiments raised in 1855, over those who
hold the diplomas of the Royal Military Academy, was one of the reasons
which led to a thorough revision of the whole system of military
education.
These results, imperfectly presented here, will, the Visitors believe,
be realized from the changes, which they now suggest, in the
requirements as to age, attainments, capacity and aptitude, and
especially in the mode of ascertaining these qualifications, of
candidates for appointments to the Cadet Corps of the United States
Army.
To the present low requirements, and mode of selecting cadets, do they
attribute the hostility which they know exists, to some extent, against
this Academy, in different parts of the country. The charges of
personal, and political favoritism in making nominations, and the
absence of reasonable search, among all the youth of a district, for the
best qualified in natural endowments and acquired knowledge irrespective
of the poverty, or wealth, or occupation, or family, or party relations
of the parents or guardians, we are forced to believe, in too many
instances, to be well founded. To these hasty and injudicious
nominations, do we attribute the bitter disappointments of so many
individuals and families caused by the numerous failures to pass the
almost formal entrance examinations in reading, spelling, penmanship,
and elementary operations of arithmetic, or if admitted, to maintain a
respectable standing in conduct and studies during their first year’s
connection with the institution. To this inequality of preparation and
maturity of mind on entrance, do we attribute the astonishing disparity
of capacity and attainments in the members of the same class, and the
very large proportion of all who are admitted, who fail to graduate in
very high standing as men of science or military promise.
To this want of preparatory knowledge, maturity of mind, and taste for
mathematical and military studies, do we attribute most of the
difficulties of internal administration, and class-room instruction. So
long as the cadet is a boy, or if full grown in body, a youth with only
boyish tastes, and without scholarly and soldierly aspirations,--so long
as not a few are in the Academy, not because they sought its privileges
from an inward and irrepressible impulse to a military career, but for
the eclat of a military position to be resigned when such position
involves sacrifices; _so long_ will the admission of each new class, and
especially, the period of encampment be signalized not only by boyish
pranks, but by personal outrages on unoffending members of the same
corps, which we had supposed to belong to the dark ages of collegiate
institutions, when boyish inmates were congregated in large numbers,
away from the restraints of family discipline;--so long will the time,
skill, and patience of able professors, which should be devoted to the
elucidation of difficult scientific principles and their applications to
military art, be engrossed in supplying the defects of an elementary
education, which should have been obtained by the cadet as well, or
better, at home; so long will the severe mathematical studies, and their
special applications, difficult enough to task a well disciplined mind
even with the preparation provided in a thorough knowledge of
arithmetic, algebra, and geometry,--be irksome in the extreme, and be
never mastered to any useful purpose to the army of the United States,
by more than one half of the graduates of the Academy;--so long will the
country be disappointed in the subsequent career of many graduates, for
whose military instruction and training all these appropriate and costly
preparations have been made.
In view of these and other considerations the Board of Visitors
unanimously recommend that the law and regulations relating to the
military academy be so modified as to provide as follows:
I. The Cadet Corps of the army of the United States shall consist of
four hundred members, to which each state and territory shall be
entitled to a number equal to its representation in the Congress of the
United States, and the remainder shall be designated by the President
from the country at large, including the District of Columbia; and he
shall also fill, in the same way, any vacancy which for any cause may
remain unfilled, for three months after the annual examination in each
year.
II. No person shall be appointed to the cadet corps until he has been
found qualified in the particulars designated by law, after a public
examination conducted in such places, at such times, and in such manner
as Congress shall prescribe; from which examination no person resident
of that portion of the country for which the same is held, shall be
excluded, who shall present credentials from the teacher or teachers
whom he had last attended, that he is over seventeen, and under
twenty-one years of age, of unblemished moral character, and personal
habits, of good physical strength and constitution, and has given
evidence of aptitude and vigor of mind for the studies and duties of a
military career. The examiners shall make return under oath to the
Secretary of War, of the persons so presenting themselves, examined, and
found qualified, arranged in the order of merit, specifying the
residence and school or schools which they have attended in the two
years previous, and the degree of merit exhibited in each subject of the
examination. And all appointments to fill vacancies for any state or
territory, or for the country at large, shall be made from these
returns, and in the order of merit as assigned by the examiners, until
the same shall be revised by new regulations of the Department.
III. No person shall be returned to the Secretary of War as a suitable
candidate for admission to the Cadet Corps, unless he
1. Shall be _over_ seventeen, and under twenty-one years of age.
2. Shall possess an unblemished moral character and correct personal
habits.
3. Shall be in good health, and in no way incapacitated by want of vigor
and elasticity of physical constitution for military service.
4. Shall possess vigor and aptitude of mind for the studies of the
Military Academy, and shall give evidence, oral and written, of a good
English education, which, in view of the wide spread facilities of
instruction in public and private schools, might very properly embrace
(_a._) The correct use of the English language, in speaking, reading,
and writing the same.
(_b._) Penmanship, book-keeping, and elementary drawing.
(_c._) The ability to perform with facility and accuracy the various
operations of arithmetic.
(_d._) The elementary principles of algebra and geometry.
(_e._) A thorough knowledge of American geography and history, and the
leading features of the Constitution of the United States, and of the
State of his residence.
(_f._) Or so much of the subjects above specified as shall be deemed
indispensable to the immediate and profitable attention of the Cadets on
their admission to the special studies and occupations of a military
school.
5. Shall make a written declaration of his desire to obtain admission to
the Cadet Corps for the purpose of qualifying himself for the military
service of the United States, which service he assumes from the date of
his appointment as cadet, to continue in the same for a period of at
least sixteen years--bearing true faith and allegiance to the
Constitution and government of the United States, against all enemies,
foreign and domestic, and paramount to all obligations to any State
government, authority, or constitution.
APPENDIX.
The Appendix to the Report of the Visitors of the Military Academy for
1863, contains the following tables and documents referred to in the
Report.
TABLE A.--Showing the condition in life of the parents of the Cadets
of the United States Military Academy from 1842 to 1863 inclusive.
TABLE B.--Showing the number of Cadets actually admitted into the
United States Military Academy from each State and Territory from its
origin March 16th, 1802, to October 19th, 1863.
TABLE C.--Showing the number of Cadets who have graduated at the
Military Academy, from its origin to 1863, with the State and
Territories where appointed.
TABLE D.--Showing the whole number of Cadets admitted and the whole
number graduated from each State and Territory from 1802 to October
1863, together with the percentage of those who graduated, and of who
failed, out of the whole number admitted from each State, and the number
of Cadets to which each State and Territory is now entitled, according
to the apportionment of members of Congress, under the Census of 1860.
STATEMENT EXHIBITING THE CONDITION OF LIFE OF THE PARENTS OF THE
CADETS OF THE U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY AT WEST POINT, NEW YORK,
FOR THE LAST TWENTY-TWO YEARS, FROM 1842 TO 1863, INCLUSIVE.
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
|1842|1843|1844|1845|1846|1847|1848|1849|1850|1851|1852
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Fathers are or were: | | | | | | | | |
farmers or planters | | | | | | | | |
| 59| 61| 61| 68| 72| 67| 69| 75| 70| 63| 67
mechanics | 14| 12| 15| 22| 22| 25| 22| 21| 16| 14| 14
judges or lawyers | | | | | | | | |
| 27| 25| 30| 35| 33| 30| 29| 23| 34| 33| 34
merchants | 18| 15| 23| 37| 29| 29| 31| 38| 36| 38| 35
boarding-house or hotel keepers | | | | | |
| 5| 2| 4| 3| 7| 6| 4| 2| 2| 2| 3
physicians| 12| 15| 15| 13| 21| 19| 21| 21| 18| 14| 14
in the army, navy, or marine corps | | | | | |
| 14| 16| 16| 13| 11| 13| 17| 17| 18| 22| 24
clergymen | 4| 6| 6| 6| 5| 3| 3| 4| 4| 4| 3
in the civil employment of the General or State government |
| 5| 15| 16| 9| 5| 2| 3| 7| 7| 8| 10
Miscellaneous: as, bank officers, editors, professors, | |
masters of vessels, &c. | | | | | | | |
| 15| 11| 15| 23| 35| 36| 41| 24| 32| 39| 30
Occupation not stated, or no occupation | | | | |
| 48| 34| 23| 17| 1| 2| 2| 8| 7| 11| 13
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total | 221| 212| 224| 236| 241| 232| 242| 240| 244| 239| 247
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Of these numbers, there are without fathers living
| 26| 57| 44| 48| 42| 41| 34| 48| 40| 45| 36
Without fathers or mothers living | | | | | |
| 22| 16| 18| 15| 21| 20| 18| 16| 26| 17| 19
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total orphans | | | | | | | | | |
| 48| 73| 62| 63| 63| 61| 52| 64| 66| 62| 55
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Of these numbers the parents are stated to be in:
moderate circumstances | | | | | | | |
| .. | 156| 150| 164| 192| 182| 193| 203| 215| 207| 218
reduced circumstances | | | | | | | |
| 182| 26| 26| 36| 35| 38| 40| 29| 25| 16| 9
indigent circumstances | | | | | | | |
| .. | 6| 8| 8| 8| 8| 4| 4| 2| 2| ..
independent circumstances | | | | | | |
| .. | 6| 10| 12| 6| 4| 5| 4| 2| 14| 20
unknown circumstances | | | | | | | |
| 39| 18| 19| 16| .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | ..
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total | 221| 212| 224| 236| 241| 232| 242| 240| 244| 239| 247
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
|1853|1854|1855|1856|1857|1858|1859|1860|1861|1862|1863
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Fathers are or were: | | | | | | | | |
farmers or planters | | | | | | | | |
| 58| 66| 62| 60| 52| 48| 57| 65| 29| 33| 38
mechanics | 13| 12| 17| 26| 22| 15| 30| 12| 13| 8| 12
judges or lawyers | | | | | | | | |
| 35| 36| 26| 25| 29| 32| 32| 36| 23| 35| 39
merchants | 35| 39| 40| 30| 26| 41| 28| 28| 23| 24| 29
boarding-house or hotel keepers | | | | | |
| 3| 5| 2| 2| 1| .. | .. | 3| 4| 4| 5
physicians| 13| 9| 8| 9| 17| 16| 10| 18| 10| 13| 18
in the army, navy, or marine corps | | | | | |
| 27| 28| 22| 20| 20| 26| 29| 33| 23| 25| 33
clergymen | 5| 4| 6| 5| 4| 5| 6| 7| 7| 8| 11
in the civil employment of the General or State government
| 11| 14| 13| 13| 7| 31| 29| 18| 8| 11| 14
Miscellaneous: as, bank officers, editors, professors, | |
masters of vessels, &c. | | | | | | | |
| 26| 14| 25| 13| 13| 12| 6| 37| 44| 39| 42
Occupation not stated, or no occupation | | | | |
| 7| 10| 19| 15| 20| 25| 39| 22| 18| 18| 19
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total | 232| 237| 239| 223| 221| 251| 266| 279| 202| 218| 260
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Of these numbers, there are without fathers living
| 35| 29| 33| 33| 24| 46| 33| 42| 25| 25| 36
Without fathers or mothers living | | | | | |
| 17| 15| 9| 6| 7| 7| 8| 10| 11| 9| 7
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total orphans | | | | | | | | | |
| 52| 44| 42| 39| 31| 53| 41| 52| 36| 34| 42
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Of these numbers the parents are stated to be in:
moderate circumstances | | | | | | | |
| 205| 206| 215| 196| 195| 216| 218| 239| 184| 199| 232
reduced circumstances | | | | | | | |
| 8| 8| 7| 8| 8| 8| 7| 6| 2| 5| 5
indigent circumstances | | | | | | | |
| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1| .. | .. | .. | 1| 5
independent circumstances| | | | | | | |
| 22| 22| 16| 18| 17| 26| 41| 34| 16| 12| 17
unknown circumstances | | | | | | | |
| .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | 1| 1
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Total | 232| 237| 239| 223| 221| 251| 266| 279| 202| 218| 260
------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
NOTE.--Of the 97 Cadets admitted, to October 19th, 1863, as given in the
table on page 321, 46 were appointed from the U.S. Volunteers engaged in
the War, who held the following rank: 1 _Captain_, 5 _First
Lieutenants_, 3 _Second Lieutenants_, 10 _Non-commissioned Officers_, 20
_Privates_, 1 _Musician_, and 6 _Clerks_, from military departments.
STATEMENT SHOWING THE NUMBER OF CADETS ACTUALLY ADMITTED INTO THE
UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY FROM ITS ORIGIN, MARCH 16TH, 1802,
TO OCTOBER 19TH, 1863.
[Transcriber’s Note:
The two following tables were each printed sideways, spanning two
pages. They have been subdivided for this e-text. Note that the
two lists are not the same.]
[KEY:
Unless otherwise noted, states are identified by their modern
two-letter abbreviations. In the second set of tables, Utah,
Washington, New Mexico and Nebraska are listed as Territories.
Year Year of Admission.
DT Dakota (Territory)
al At large.
u Unknown
t Total]
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Year | ME| NH| VT| MA| RI| CT| NY| NJ| PA| DE| MD| VA| WV| NC
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
1802 |...|...|...| 5|...| 1| 1|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...
1803 |...|...| 3|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1
1804 |...|...| 1|...|...|...| 1|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...
1805 |...|...| 3|...|...|...| 2|...| 2|...|...|...|...|...
1806 |...|...| 5| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...|...
1807 |...| 2| 5| 2|...| 2| 2|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1808 | 1| 1| 8| 2|...| 4| 10|...| 2|...| 1| 2|...|...
1809 | 1|...|...| 2|...|...| 1| 2|...|...|...|...|...|...
1810 |...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1811 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1812 | 1| 1| 1| 1|...|...| 3|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1813 |...| 1| 3| 11|...| 1| 30|...| 5|...| 5| 6|...| 4
1814 |...|...| 4| 14| 1|...| 48| 4| 9| 2| 21| 22|...| 3
1815 |...|...| 1| 1|...| 1| 14| 1| 4| 4| 6| 5|...| 3
1816 |...| 2|...| 1|...| 2| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1| 9|...| 2
1817 |...| 3| 3| 6|...| 2| 5| 1| 3| 1| 3| 4|...|...
1818 |...| 4| 4| 11| 1| 6| 22| 3| 13|...| 6| 17|...| 5
1819 | 4| 1| 5| 4| 1| 5| 11| 6| 9| 3| 3| 10|...| 4
1820 | 3| 3| 1| 6| 1| 1| 9|...| 11|...| 4| 4|...| 3
1821 |...| 1|...| 5|...| 1| 16| 4| 7| 2| 5| 8|...| 5
1822 | 3| 4| 5| 6| 1| 4| 10| 1| 14| 1| 4| 12|...| 7
1823 | 2|...| 3| 7| 1| 3| 13| 2| 9| 1| 4| 13|...| 9
1824 | 5| 2| 1| 5| 2| 4| 8| 3| 7| 1| 3| 2|...| 1
1825 | 2| 2| 1| 6| 1| 3| 15| 2| 12| 1| 7| 7|...| 6
1826 | 2| 3| 1| 2| 4| 1| 12| 3| 8| 2| 6| 11|...| 5
1827 | 1| 3| 3| 3| 1|...| 18| 1| 11| 1| 3| 15|...| 9
1828 | 5| 4| 2| 5| 1| 5| 11| 2| 10| 1| 3| 14|...| 6
1829 | 1| 3| 4| 10| 1| 4| 16| 2| 13| 1| 2| 14|...| 5
1830 | 1| 2| 1| 4| 2| 1| 14| 2| 8|...| 5| 18|...| 5
1831 | 4| 1| 1| 5| 2| 2| 18| 2| 6| 2| 7| 8|...| 6
1832 | 3| 3| 1| 4| 2| 2| 11| 4| 12| 2| 3| 10|...| 7
1833 | 1| 2| 1| 8|...| 6| 9| 2| 8| 1| 6| 17|...| 5
1834 |...| 1| 2| 1|...| 1| 7| 1| 5| 2| 4| 4|...| 2
1835 | 5| 1| 2| 4|...| 1| 13| 1| 10|...| 2| 1|...| 4
1836 | 4| 4| 1| 2| 3| 2| 19| 4| 8|...| 2| 10|...| 5
1837 | 2| 1|...| 5|...| 3| 17| 3| 13| 1 | 6| 14|...| 6
1838 | 1| 1| 2| 2| 1| 2| 9|...| 8| 1 | 3| 10|...| 4
1839 | 2| 1| 2| 2| 1| 2| 12| 4| 7| 1 | 1| 2|...| 1
1840 | 4|...|...| 6| 2|...| 16| 1| 7| 1 | 2| 5|...| 7
1841 | 3| 2| 2| 7|...| 4| 12|...| 11|...| 3| 10|...| 3
1842 | 2| 1| 1| 7| 1| 1| 12| 3| 11|...| 4| 9|...| 4
1843 |...| 1| 1| 1|...|...| 5|...| 5| 1 | 1|...|...| 1
1844 | 1| 2|...| 2| 1| 1| 7| 2| 7|...| 2| 3|...| 4
1845 | 3| 1| 1| 3|...| 3| 12| 1| 6|...| 1| 6|...| 1
1846 | 3| 1| 2| 5| 1| 2| 14| 1| 10| 1 | 4| 7|...| 5
1847 | 3| 1| 2| 2|...| 1| 10| 1| 8|...| 1| 5|...| 3
1848 | 1| 1|...| 1| 1| 1| 9| 4| 7|...| 3| 3|...| 3
1849 | 3| 1| 1| 3|...| 2| 11| 3| 7| 1 |...| 8|...| 1
1850 | 3| 2| 3| 4| 1|...| 8| 1| 11|...| 2| 7|...| 4
1851 | 1|...| 1| 5|...| 1| 13|...| 8| 1 | 1| 3|...| 3
1852 | 2|...|...|...| 1| 1| 13| 3| 5|...| 3| 3|...| 3
1853 | 2| 2|...| 3|...| 3| 8| 3| 4|...| 3| 5|...| 3
1854 | 3|...| 2| 5| 1| 1| 10| 2| 10|...| 4| 5|...| 2
1855 |...|...| 1| 3| 2| 1| 11| 1| 11| 1 | 1| 2|...| 3
1856 | 2| 1| 1| 2|...|...| 11| 2| 8|...| 1| 3|...|...
1857 | 3| 2|...| 2| 1| 2| 6| 1| 8|...| 1| 7|...| 2
1858 | 2|...|...| 5|...| 1| 5| 2| 3|...| 2| 4|...| 4
1859 |...|...| 1| 1|...| 1| 4| 2| 8|...| 1| 2|...| 2
1860 | 2|...| 1| 3| 1|...| 10| 1| 9| 1 | 1| 2|...| 2
1861 | 4| 3| 1| 4| 1| 2| 14| 2| 13| 1 | 3| 2|...|...
1862 | 1|...| 1| 3| 1| 1| 11| 1| 6|...| 4| 1|...|...
1863 |...|...| 2| 2|...| 1| 8| 2| 5|...| 3| 7| 1| 7
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Total.|102| 78|104|232| 42|102|650|101|424| 41|179|379| 1|190
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
Year |SC |GA |AL |MS |LA |OH |KY |TN |IN |IL |MO |AR |MI |FL |TX
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
1802 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...
1803 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...
1804 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 5|...|...|...|...
1805 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...
1806 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1807 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1808 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1809 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1810 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1811 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1812 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1813 | 2| 2|...|...|...| 2| 1|...| 2|...|...|...|...|...|...
1814 |...| 1|...|...|...| 4| 5|...| 1|...|...|...| 1|...|...
1815 | 4| 1|...|...|...| 1| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...
1816 | 4| 2|...|...|...| 2|...| 2|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1817 | 8| 1| 1|...| 1| 2| 3| 5| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1818 | 5| 1|...|...| 1| 3| 5| 3|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1819 | 5| 1|...| 1|...| 1| 5|...| 1|...| 1|...| 2|...|...
1820 | 3| 1|...| 2| 1| 1| 4| 2|...| 1| 2|...|...|...|...
1821 | 5| 5|...|...|...| 1| 6| 3| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1822 | 9| 4| 2|...| 1| 3| 3| 4| 1|...| 2|...| 1| 2|...
1823 | 3| 3|...|...| 3| 8| 8| 4|...| 1| 4|...| 2|...|...
1824 | 2| 3| 3| 2| 2| 5| 6| 5| 4| 2|...|...|...|...|...
1825 | 6| 5| 2| 1| 1| 5| 7| 3| 1| 1| 2|...| 1|...|...
1826 | 1| 4| 1|...| 4| 3| 3| 7| 2| 1| 1|...|...| 1|...
1827 | 4| 1| 1|...| 2| 7| 5| 2|...| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1|...
1828 | 4| 2| 3| 2|...| 4| 8| 5| 3| 1|...| 1| 1| 1|...
1829 | 6| 4| 3|...| 3| 4| 3| 2| 1|...| 3|...|...| 1|...
1830 | 3| 5| 1|...| 1| 3| 6| 5| 3| 1| 1| 1|...| 1|...
1831 | 4| 4| 1| 1| 1| 4| 6| 3|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...
1832 | 5| 2| 3| 1| 1| 2| 5| 4| 2| 3|...|...| 2| 1|...
1833 | 1| 3|...| 3| 4| 4| 4| 6| 3| 2| 2|...| 1| 2|...
1834 | 4| 4| 4| 2| 1| 3| 3| 5| 1| 2| 1|...| 1|...|...
1835 | 3|...| 1|...| 2| 5| 3| 7| 3| 1|...|...|...|...|...
1836 | 3| 5| 2| 1| 1| 7| 3| 5| 1| 1|...|...|...| 1|...
1837 | 6| 6| 2|...|...| 6| 4| 3| 3| 2|...| 1| 1|...|...
1838 | 3| 6| 3|...| 2| 7| 6| 6| 2| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...
1839 | 2| 2| 3|...|...| 3| 6| 1| 2|...| 1| 1| 1| 1|...
1840 | 4| 4|...| 1| 1| 6| 5| 5| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1841 | 4| 5| 1|...| 2| 8| 4| 7| 3| 1|...| 1|...| 1|...
1842 | 6| 5| 3| 1|...| 4| 4| 4| 2| 3|...| 1|...|...|...
1843 | 3|...| 3| 1| 2| 6|...| 3| 4| 3| 2|...| 3|...|...
1844 | 2| 1| 4| 1| 2| 5| 3| 3| 3| 3| 2| 1| 2|...|...
1845 | 2| 2| 3| 2| 2| 7| 5| 3| 2| 1| 2|...| 1| 1|...
1846 | 1| 5| 4| 2| 4| 4| 4| 5| 2| 2| 1|...|...|...| 2
1847 | 3|...| 1|...| 1| 7| 3| 3| 3| 2| 1|...| 1|...|...
1848 | 3| 3| 2| 2|...| 10| 3| 3| 2| 4| 2| 1| 1|...|...
1849 | 1| 3| 3| 3|...| 8| 1| 3| 3| 3| 2| 1| 1| 1| 2
1850 | 4| 4| 2| 2| 3| 2| 5| 3| 3| 2|...|...|...|...|...
1851 |...| 1| 1| 1| 2| 5| 3| 3| 2| 3|...| 1|...|...|...
1852 | 1|...| 2| 1| 2| 7| 5| 7| 5| 1| 2|...| 3|...|...
1853 | 2| 5| 4|...| 1| 6| 4| 2| 3| 1| 3|...| 1| 1| 1
1854 | 3| 3| 4| 3| 2| 6| 1| 6| 2| 4| 3| 2| 1|...| 1
1855 | 2| 1|...| 1| 1| 7| 1|...| 3| 7| 1|...| 1| 1| 1
1856 | 1| 1| 1| 1| 2| 4| 3| 4| 3|...| 2| 1| 2| 1| 1
1857 | 2| 3| 2| 3| 2| 5| 7| 4| 1| 1| 2|...| 1|...| 1
1858 | 2| 5| 2| 1| 1| 9| 1| 4| 6| 1|...|...|...| 1|...
1859 | 1| 2| 2| 2| 2| 4| 3| 4| 3| 2|...|...|...|...|...
1860 | 2|...| 3| 2| 1| 4| 2| 2| 2| 7| 2| 1|...|...|...
1861 |...|...| 1|...|...| 8| 1|...| 6| 3| 3|...| 3|...|...
1862 |...|...|...|...|...| 7| 7|...| 4| 4| 5|...|...|...|...
1863 | 4| 8| 4| 5| 2| 4| 2| 7| 2| 1| 1| 2|...| 1| 2
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Total.|159|139| 88| 51| 67|243|196|178|109| 81| 67| 17| 38| 20| 11
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+---+-----
Year |IA|WI|CA|MN|OR|NM|UT|WA|NE|KS|DT|CO|NV|DC | al| u |Total
------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+---+-----
1802 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...|...| 10
1803 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 2| 9
1804 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 1| 9
1805 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 1| 9
1806 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|...|...| 9
1807 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 4| 17
1808 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 11| 42
1809 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...| 4| 10
1810 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...|...| 2
1811 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...|...|...| 0
1812 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2|...|...| 10
1813 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 12|...| 1| 88
1814 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 6|...|...| 146
1815 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 12|...|...| 61
1816 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 2 |...| 34
1817 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2|...|...| 55
1818 |..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 5|...|...| 116
1819 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 86
1820 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 4|...|...| 67
1821 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2|...|...| 77
1822 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2|...|...| 106
1823 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 1 | 1| 106
1824 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|...|...| 79
1825 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 103
1826 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 91
1827 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|...|...| 97
1828 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 107
1829 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 109
1830 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 5|...|...| 99
1831 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 92
1832 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3| 3 |...| 101
1833 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 5|...|...| 106
1834 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2|...|...| 63
1835 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 4|...| 1| 74
1836 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3|...|...| 97
1837 |..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 4| 7 |...| 117
1838 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3| 26|...| 111
1839 | 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 13|...| 76
1840 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 5 |...| 84
1841 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 3| 17|...| 114
1842 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 2| 18|...| 109
1843 | 1| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 12|...| 60
1844 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 11|...| 75
1845 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 81
1846 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 10|...| 103
1847 | 2|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 9 |...| 74
1848 |..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 81
1849 | 1| 2|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 89
1850 |..| 2| 1| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 90
1851 |..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 11|...| 71
1852 | 1|..| 1|..|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 16|...| 90
1853 | 2|..|..|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 83
1854 |..| 3| 1| 1| 1|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 103
1855 |..| 1| 2|..|..| 1|..| 1|..| 1|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 80
1856 | 1| 2|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1| 10|...| 73
1857 | 1|..| 1|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 82
1858 | 1|..| 1| 1|..|..|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 75
1859 |..|..|..| 1|..|..|..| 1|..| 1|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 60
1860 |..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|...| 10|...| 72
1861 | 1| 3|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|..|..| 1| 26|...| 108
1862 | 2|..| 2| 1|..| 1|..|..| 1| 1|..| 1|..| 1| 13|...| 81
1863 |..|..| 1|..| 1| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1|...| 10|...| 97
------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+---+-----
Total.|14|17|10| 6| 3| 5| 3| 2| 2| 3| 1| 1| 1|113|330| 26|4626
------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+---+-----
NOTE.--Owing to the destruction of the records by fire in 1838, the
States in which some of the Cadets resided previous to that event is
given; though it is believed they were appointed “At Large.” The
President of the United States having determined late in August, 1863,
to fill all the existing vacancies from the seceded States there were in
the FOURTH CLASS, numbering 97, on the 19th of October, 48 thus
appointed. 10 Cadets similarly appointed had not, on that date, been
examined for admission into the Military Academy.
THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT EXHIBITS THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF CADETS WHO
HAVE GRADUATED AT THE MILITARY ACADEMY, FROM ITS ORIGIN TO THE
PRESENT DATE, WITH THE STATES AND TERRITORIES WHENCE APPOINTED.
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Year | ME| NH| VT| MA| RI| CT| NY| NJ| PA| DE
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
1802 |...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1803 |...|...|...| 1|...|...| 1|...|...|...
1804 |...|...| 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1805 |...|...|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...|...
1806 |...|...| 5| 1|...|...| 2| 1| 1|...
1807 |...|...| 4|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...
1808 |...| 2| 6| 3|...| 1| 1|...|...| 1
1809 |...|...| 2| 1|...|...| 3|...|...|...
1811 | 1| 1| 3| 1|...| 2| 5| 1| 2|...
1812 | 1|...| 3| 2|...| 3| 4| 1| 1|...
1813 |...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...
1814 |...| 1| 2| 5|...| 1| 9|...| 3|...
1815 |...|...| 1| 5|...|...| 14|...| 1|...
1817 | 1|...| 1|...| 1|...| 4|...| 1|...
1818 |...|...| 1| 2|...| 1| 3| 1| 2| 2
1819 |...| 1| 3| 4|...| 1| 6| 2|...| 1
1820 |...|...|...| 1|...|...| 11| 1|...|...
1821 |...| 1|...| 4|...| 1| 6|...| 2|...
1822 |...| 2| 3| 2| 1| 5| 6| 2| 6|...
1823 |...| 1| 3| 4| 1| 3| 5| 2| 3| 2
1824 | 1| 3|...| 5|...|...| 6|...| 4|...
1825 |...| 1| 1| 2|...| 1| 9| 3| 5|...
1826 | 1| 2| 2| 1| 1|...| 2| 1| 7| 1
1827 |...|...| 3| 4|...|...| 6|...| 4|...
1828 | 3| 1| 2| 4|...| 5| 2| 1| 1|...
1829 | 2| 1| 1| 5|...| 3| 7| 3| 4|...
1830 | 2|...| 1| 1| 2|...| 6| 1| 4| 1
1831 | 1| 1|...|...| 1|...| 8| 2| 4| 1
1832 | 3| 3| 1| 2| 1| 1| 6| 1| 5|...
1833 |...| 2| 1| 7|...| 2| 5| 1| 5| 1
1834 |...| 1| 2| 1|...| 1| 7|...| 6|...
1835 | 4| 1| 1| 4|...|...| 11| 2| 4| 1
1836 | 2| 3| 1| 1| 3| 1| 10| 3| 6| 1
1837 | 1| 1| 1| 6|...| 2| 4| 3| 5| 2
1838 |...|...| 2|...|...| 1| 7|...| 4|...
1839 | 2| 1| 1| 2|...| 1| 6|...| 5|...
1840 | 3| 1|...| 2|...|...| 8| 1| 3|...
1841 | 1| 1| 1| 5|...| 2| 6|...| 7| 1
1842 | 1| 1| 1| 2| 2|...| 7| 1| 5|...
1843 | 2| 1| 2|...|...| 1| 7| 2| 4|...
1844 |...| 1|...| 1| 1| 1| 2|...| 3| 1
1845 | 3|...| 1| 2|...| 1| 8|...| 1|...
1846 | 2| 1| 2| 4| 1| 1| 10| 1| 8|...
1847 |...|...|...|...|...|...| 5|...| 3|...
1848 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...| 5| 3| 5|...
1849 |...| 1| 1| 2|...| 2| 5|...| 3|...
1850 | 3| 1| 1| 3| 1|...| 7|...| 6|...
1851 | 1|...| 1| 3|...| 1| 6|...| 5|...
1852 |...|...|...|...| 1| 1| 7| 2| 4|...
1853 | 1| 1|...| 2|...| 1| 5| 1| 3|...
1854 | 2| 1| 2| 1| 1|...| 4| 1| 5|...
1855 |...| 1| 1| 4|...|...| 7|...| 8| 1
1856 | 1|...|...|...|...|...| 8| 1| 3|...
1857 | 2| 2|...| 2|...| 2| 3| 1| 1|...
1858 | 1|...|...| 4|...| 1| 1| 1| 1|...
1859 |...|...| 1|...|...|...| 4|...| 4|...
1860 | 1|...| 1| 3| 1|...| 7| 1| 3| 1
1861 | 3| 3| 1| 3| 1| 2| 15| 2| 10|...
1862 | 1|...|...| 3|...| 1| 3|...| 2|...
1863 |...|...| 1| 2|...| 1| 4| 1| 5|...
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Total| 54| 47| 75|131| 20| 55|329| 51|197| 18
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Year | MD| VA| NC|SC |GA |AL |MS |LA |OH |IN
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
1802 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1803 |...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1804 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1805 |...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1806 |...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1807 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1808 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1809 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1811 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1812 |...| 1|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...
1813 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1814 |...| 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1
1815 | 4| 2|...| 2| 3|...|...|...| 4|...
1817 |...| 8|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1
1818 | 5| 3| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...
1819 | 3| 2| 1| 1|...|...|...| 1|...|...
1820 | 5| 3| 3| 1|...|...|...|...| 1|...
1821 | 2| 1|...| 3| 1|...|...|...| 1| 1
1822 |...| 5| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...| 2|...
1823 |...|...| 3| 1|...|...| 1|...|...|...
1824 | 3| 2|...| 2|...|...| 1| 1|...|...
1825 | 3| 3| 2| 2| 2|...|...|...|...|...
1826 | 2| 8| 3| 2| 1|...|...| 1|...| 1
1827 | 2| 4| 3| 2|...| 1|...|...| 3|...
1828 | 1| 1|...| 1|...| 1| 1| 1| 2| 2
1829 | 2| 2| 2| 3| 3|...|...|...| 4| 1
1830 | 4| 2| 2| 1| 1|...|...| 1| 1| 1
1831 | 3| 2| 2| 1| 1|...|...|...| 3|...
1832 | 2| 4| 1| 1|...| 1| 1|...| 3|...
1833 | 1| 5| 1| 2| 1| 2|...|...|...| 1
1834 | 1| 5|...| 1| 1|...|...|...| 1| 1
1835 | 2| 4| 3| 2| 3| 1|...|...| 4|...
1836 | 2| 5| 2| 2|...|...|...|...|...| 1
1837 | 4| 6| 2|...| 2| 1|...|...|...| 2
1838 | 1| 3| 1| 2| 2| 2| 2| 2| 3|...
1839 | 1| 1| 1| 1|...|...|...|...| 3| 1
1840 |...| 4| 3|...|...|...|...| 1| 6|...
1841 | 4| 7| 1| 3|...|...|...|...| 2| 3
1842 | 2| 7| 1| 3| 1| 2| 1| 1| 4| 1
1843 |...| 3|...|...|...|...|...|...| 3| 2
1844 | 2| 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 2|...
1845 |...| 2| 1|...| 2|...|...| 1| 4| 2
1846 | 3| 5| 2| 1| 4|...|...|...|...|...
1847 |...| 2| 1| 2|...|...|...|...| 8| 4
1848 |...| 1| 1| 3|...| 2|...|...| 1| 1
1849 |...| 5|...|...| 2|...| 2|...| 4| 2
1850 | 3| 2| 2| 1| 2|...|...| 2|...|...
1851 |...| 2| 3|...|...| 1|...| 1| 2| 2
1852 | 2|...| 2|...|...| 2| 1|...| 6| 2
1853 | 1| 5|...| 2| 3| 1|...|...| 8| 3
1854 |...| 4| 2| 3| 2| 2| 2| 1| 1| 1
1855 |...|...| 2|...| 1|...|...| 1| 2| 1
1856 |...| 2| 1|...|...| 1| 1|...| 7| 3
1857 |...| 3|...| 2| 4| 2|...|...| 2| 1
1858 | 2|...| 2| 1| 2| 1| 1|...| 2| 1
1859 | 1| 1|...|...|...| 1|...|...| 2|...
1860 | 1|...| 2| 2|...| 1|...|...| 3| 1
1861 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| 5| 1
1862 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 6| 1
1863 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 3| 2
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Total| 79|142| 63| 59| 44| 26| 14| 15|118| 48
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----------
Year |IL |KY |TN |AR |MO |MI |WI |DC |FL | at large
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----------
1802 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1803 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1804 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1805 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1806 |...|...|...|...| 4|...|...|...|...| ...
1807 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1808 |...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...| ...
1809 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1811 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1812 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1813 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1814 |...| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 5|...| ...
1815 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 4|...| ...
1817 |...| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1818 |...| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1819 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1820 |...|...| 2|...|...|...|...| 2|...| ...
1821 |...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1822 |...| 1| 1|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1823 |...| 2| 1|...|...| 1|...| 2|...| ...
1824 |...| 2| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1825 |...| 2| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1826 |...| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...| 1| 1| ...
1827 |...| 4|...|...|...| 1|...| 1|...| ...
1828 | 1|...| 2|...| 1|...|...|...|...| ...
1829 |...| 2|...|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1830 | 1| 4| 2|...| 1|...|...| 3|...| ...
1831 |...| 2| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| ...
1832 | 1| 3| 3|...|...| 1|...| 1|...| ...
1833 |...| 1| 2|...| 1|...|...| 2|...| ...
1834 |...| 4| 1|...| 1|...|...| 1| 1| ...
1835 |...| 4| 1|...|...|...|...| 3|...| 1
1836 |...| 2| 1|...|...|...|...| 1|...| 2
1837 | 1| 1| 1|...| 1| 1|...| 3|...| ...
1838 | 1| 3| 2|...| 1| 1|...| 1|...| 4
1839 |...| 3| 1|...|...|...|...| 1|...| ...
1840 |...|...| 3|...|...|...|...| 2| 1| 4
1841 | 2| 1| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...|...| 2
1842 | 1| 3| 1|...|...|...|...| 2|...| 6
1843 |...| 2| 1|...| 1| 1|...|...|...| 6
1844 |...| 4| 1| 1|...|...|...| 2|...| 1
1845 |...| 3| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 1| 8
1846 | 1| 1| 3|...|...|...|...| 1|...| 8
1847 | 2|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...|...| 8
1848 | 2|...| 2| 1|...| 1| 1|...|...| 7
1849 |...| 2| 2|...| 1|...|...|...| 1| 8
1850 | 1| 2| 2|...|...|...|...|...|...| 5
1851 | 1| 2| 3|...|...|...|...| 1|...| 6
1852 | 1| 2| 1|...| 1| 2|...|...|...| 6
1853 | 2| 1| 2|...| 2|...|...|...| 1| 5
1854 |...|...| 1|...|...|...| 3|...|...| 6
1855 | 2|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...| 3
1856 |...| 4| 2|...| 1| 2|...| 1|...| 10
1857 | 1| 3| 1|...| 2|...|...|...|...| 3
1858 |...| 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...| 3
1859 | 1|...| 1|...|...| 1| 1|...|...| 3
1860 | 6|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...| 5
1861 | 1| 4| 1| 1| 2| 3| 2| 1|...| 14
1862 |...| 1| 1|...| 1|...|...|...|...| 5
1863 |...| 2|...|...|...|...|...| 2|...| ...
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----------
Total| 30| 83| 56| 5| 24| 17| 7| 50| 6| 139
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----------
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++-----------
Year |IA |TX |UT |MN |WA |OR |NM |CA |NE || Aggregate
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++-----------
1802 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 2
1803 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 3
1804 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 2
1805 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 3
1806 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 15
1807 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 5
1808 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 15
1809 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 7
1811 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 19
1812 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 18
1813 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 1
1814 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 30
1815 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 40
1817 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 19
1818 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 23
1819 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 29
1820 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 30
1821 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 24
1822 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 40
1823 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 35
1824 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 31
1825 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 37
1826 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 41
1827 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 38
1828 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 33
1829 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 46
1830 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 42
1831 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 33
1832 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 45
1833 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 43
1834 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 36
1835 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 56
1836 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 49
1837 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 50
1838 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 45
1839 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 31
1840 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 42
1841 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 52
1842 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 56
1843 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 39
1844 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 25
1845 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 41
1846 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 59
1847 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 38
1848 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 38
1849 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 43
1850 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 44
1851 | 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 42
1852 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 43
1853 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 52
1854 |...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 46
1855 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 34
1856 |...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 48
1857 | 1| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 39
1858 |...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|...|| 27
1859 |...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|...|| 22
1860 |...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|| 41
1861 | 1|...|...|...|...| 1| 1|...|...|| 80
1862 |...|...|...| 1|...|...|...| 1| 1|| 28
1863 |...|...|...|...| 1|...|...|...|...|| 25
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++-----------
Total| 6| 3| 1| 2| 2| 1| 1| 1| 1|| 2020
------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++-----------
TABLE D.
EXHIBITING THE WHOLE NUMBER OF CADETS ADMITTED TO THE MILITARY ACADEMY
FROM EACH STATE AND TERRITORY, AND THE WHOLE NUMBER GRADUATED.
[KEY
DC District of Columbia
T Total
N Number
E No. entitl’d ’60
% Per cent. _printed as shown_]
---------------+---------+--------------+----------+---------+-----
|Admitted.| Graduated. |Failed to | Remain. |
STATE | | | Graduate.| |
AND +----+----+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+
TERRITORY. |From| T |From| T | % | N | % |No. | % | E
---------------+----+----+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+-----
Alabama |1817| 88|1822| 26|.295| 61 |.693| 1|.012| 7
Arkansas |1827| 17|1841| 5|.294| ... |.705| ...| ...| 2
California |1850| 10|1862| 1|.100| 6 |.600| 3|.300| 3
Connecticut |1802| 102|1805| 55|.539| 43 |.422| 4|.039| 4
Delaware |1806| 41|1808| 18|.439| 22 |.539| 1|.022| 1
Florida |1822| 20|1826| 6|.300| 14 |.700| ...|....| 1
Georgia |1813| 139|1815| 44|.329| 95 |.670| ...|....| 3
Illinois |1815| 81|1819| 30|.379| 42 |.519| 9|.111| 13
Indiana |1812| 109|1814| 48|.440| 52 |.477| 9|.083| 11
Iowa |1839| 14|1843| 6|.428| 6 |.428| 2|.144| 6
Kansas |1855| 3|....| ...|....| 2 |.667| 1|.333| 1
Kentucky |1813| 196|1819| 83|.423| 105 |.531| 8|.046| 9
Louisiana |1817| 67|1819| 15|.223| 51 |.761| 1|.016| 4
Maine |1808| 102|1811| 54|.529| 43 |.422| 5|.049| 5
Maryland |1802| 179|1802| 79|.441| 95 |.537| 5|.022| 5
Massachusetts |1802| 232|1802| 131|.324| 91 |.392| 10|.043| 10
Michigan |1814| 38|1823| 17|.447| 18 |.474| 3|.079| 6
Minnesota |1850| 6|1859| 2|.333| 2 |.333| 2|.333| 2
Mississippi |1819| 51|1823| 14|.274| 37 |.725| ...|....| 5
Missouri |1802| 67|1806| 24|.358| 37 |.552| 6|.090| 9
New Hampshire |1817| 78|1808| 47|.602| 28 |.359| 3|.039| 3
New Jersey |1803| 101|1806| 51|.504| 45 |.446| 5|.050| 5
New York |1802| 650|1803| 329|.506| 289 |.444| 32|.050| 31
North Carolina |1803| 190|1805| 63|.331| 127 |.668| ...|....| 8
Ohio |1813| 243|1815| 118|.485| 105 |.432| 20|.083| 19
Oregon |1854| 3|1861| 1|.333| 1 |.333| 1|.333| 1
Pennsylvania |1804| 424|1806| 197|.464| 203 |.479| 24|.057| 24
Rhode Island |1814| 42|1817| 20|.476| 20 |.476| 2|.048| 2
South Carolina |1809| 159|1806| 59|.371| 100 |.628| ...|....| 6
Tennessee |1815| 178|1820| 56|.314| 122 |.686| ...|....| 10
Texas |1840| 11|1853| 3|.272| 8 |.727| ...|....| 2
Vermont |1803| 104|1804| 75|.721| 26 |.250| 3|.029| 3
Virginia |1803| 379|1803| 142|.374| 237 |.615| 4|.011| 13
West Virginia |1863| 1|....| ...|....| ... |....| 1|.000| 1
Wisconsin |1837| 17|1848| 7|.411| 7 |.412| 3|.177| 6
District of | | | | | | | | | |
Columbia |1806| 113|1811| 50|.443| 62 |.549| 1|.008| 1
New Mexico |1852| 5|1861| 1|.200| 3 |.600| 1|.200| 1
Utah |1853| 3|1858| 1|.333| 1 |.333| 1|.333| 1
Washington |1855| 2|1861| 2|.100| ... |....| 1|.500| 1
Nebraska |1858| 2|1862| 1|.500| ... |....| 1|.000| 1
Dakota |1861| 1|....| ...|....| ... |....| 1|.000| 1
Colorado |1863| 1|....| ...|....| ... |....| 1|.000| 1
Nevada |1863| 1|....| ...|....| ... |....| 1|.000| 1
At large |1837| 330|....| 139|.421| 156 |.473| 35|.106| 40
Unknown |1803| 26|....| ...|....| ... |....| ...|....| ...
---------------+----+----+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+-----
Total | |4626| |2020| | | | 210| | 294
---------------+----+----+----+----+----+-----+----+----+----+-----
The Totals in the column of Cadets admitted, graduated, and failed to
graduate, for each State and Territory, and for the country at large,
are obtained from Tables prepared by Capt. Boynton, in his “History of
the United States Military Academy.” The per centage of graduates,
failures, &c., is calculated from the totals thus obtained. The minute
accuracy of the results is slightly effected by the difficulty of
assigning the twenty-six Cadets admitted, whose place of residence was
unknown, to their respective States. The column of Cadets to which each
State and Territory is entitled in the apportionment of members of
Congress under the Census of 1860, is official so far as States not
involved in rebellion are concerned; the latter is given according to
the Census of 1850.
OPINIONS OF COL. THAYER AND OTHERS.
_On the recommendations of the Board of Visitors as to the conditions of
admission to the United States Military Academy at West Point._
Extract from a letter of COL. SYLVANUS THAYER, Superintendent of the
United States Military Academy, from 1816 to 1831.
“The Extracts from the Report of the Visitors at West Point, for 1863,
I have read with the highest satisfaction, not to say admiration. The
subject of the admission of Cadets, their number, age, attainments, and
mode of appointment, is discussed in the most complete and able manner,
_ne laissant rien a desirer_, as far as I can see. I am naturally the
more pleased from finding my own views so perfectly reflected in many
important particulars. The only difference I notice is the small
addition to my standard of attainment for admission. I not only agree to
that, but would raise the standard as high as Congress would be willing
to adopt. The higher the standard, the more perfect will be the test of
capacity. The subject, as you may well suppose, is not a new one with
me. More than forty years ago I made my first effort to have the mode of
appointment by nomination, done away with, and admission by open
competition adopted. My last effort before the late one, was made in
1858, while I was in command of the Corps of Engineers, during the
absence of Gen. Totten. At the same time, I recommended a higher
standard of attainment, a Board of Improvement, and some of the other
changes comprised in my “Propositions,” but with little expectation,
however, that my solitary voice would be heeded. After long despairing,
I am now encouraged and cheered. Admission by competitive examination,
open to all, may not be attained as soon as we wish, but come it must at
no distant day. Let every future Board of Visitors recall the attention
of the Government to your excellent Report; no new arguments are needed,
and let all the publications devoted to the cause of education, agitate
the question unceasingly.”
We have been favored with the perusal of the “Propositions,” referred to
in Col. Thayer’s letter, and submitted by him to the Secretary of War,
in 1863, with “Suggestions for the Improvement of the United States
Military Academy.” So far as the Visitors go, their views, and those of
Col. Thayer, are almost identical, but Col. Thayer’s communication to
the Secretary includes many other suggestions relating to the
instruction, discipline, and administration of the institution, which we
hope will be adopted by the Secretary, and embodied in the Regulations.
In addition to the modifications suggested by Col. Thayer, we should
like to see the theoretical course at West Point reduced to two years;
and Special Courses, or Schools of Application and Practice established
for the Engineer, Artillery, Cavalry, and Infantry service, open only to
those who should show natural aptitude, and the proper amount of
acquired knowledge, whether graduates of the scientific course of West
Point, or any State scientific or classical school, in a competitive
examination. In each of these courses or schools, there should be a
graduation, and promotion, in the particular service, according to
merit. Our whole system of military instruction should terminate in a
STAFF SCHOOL, open only to those who, in addition to the knowledge
required for graduation in at least two of the above special courses,
should have had at least three years actual experience in service. While
members of the Staff School, these candidates for the Staff Corps,
should, if called for by the State authorities, assist without
compensation, in conducting Military Encampments of the Officers of the
State Militia, like those held every year in Switzerland, and
corresponding to what is known in this country to Teacher’s Institutes.
The graduates of the Staff School, should constitute the Staff Corps,
from which all vacancies in the higher offices of the Regular Army
should be filled, and all appointments to new regiments be made.
EXTRACT from a letter of GEN. H. K. OLIVER.
I have read with the utmost care, the Extract from the Report of the
Board of Examiners of the Military Academy at West Point, for the year
1863, and most heartily concur in the views therein set forth, and
especially in that portion of it, which recommends a competitive
examination of candidates for admission. In all its relations it is
right. In fact it stands out prominently as the only proper mode of
admittance.
My intimate acquaintance with the Academy, having attended the
examination in 1846, by invitation, and again in 1847, as Secretary of
the Board of Visitors for that year, enables me to speak with reasonable
authority. These visits afforded me opportunities, which I improved to
the utmost, and most minutely, to become intimately well informed of the
effect of the prevailing method of selection, and of its practical
results upon character and scholarship after admission, as well as to
know, with what degree of fidelity, the institution was answering the
intent of its founding, and the just expectation of the country; and I
was then satisfied, and subsequent observation has confirmed me in my
opinion, that whatever of deficiency prevailed, was traceable to the
method of admission. Faithful teachers and faithful teaching will
achieve great results, but they can not make good, incompetent natural
endowments, nor infuse vigor and life into sluggish natures. I sincerely
hope that the Government will feel the force of your views, and comply
with your most commendable recommendations.
RESOLUTION adopted by the American Institute of Instruction at the
Annual Meeting in August; 1863.
WHEREAS, the security and honor of this whole country require in the
military and naval service the right sort of men with the right sort of
knowledge and training; _and whereas_, the military and naval schools
established to impart this knowledge and training will fail in their
objects, unless young men are selected as students of the right age,
with suitable preparatory knowledge, with vigor of body, and aptitude of
mind, for the special studies of such schools; _and whereas_, the mode
of determining the qualifications and selecting the students, may be
made to test the thoroughness of the elementary education given in the
several States, therefor
_Resolved_, That the Directors of the American Institute of
Instruction are authorized and instructed to memorialize the Congress of
the United States, to revise the terms and mode of admission to the
National Military and Naval Schools, so as to invite young men of the
right spirit, and with vigor and aptitude of mind for mathematical and
military studies, who aspire to serve their country in the military and
naval service, to compete in open trial before intelligent and impartial
examiners in each State, without fear or favor, without reference to the
wealth, or poverty, or occupation, or political opinions of their
parents or guardians, for such admission, and that in all cases the
order of admission shall be according to the personal merits and fitness
of the candidate.”
EXTRACT from letter of Prof. Monroe, St. John’s College, Fordham, N.Y.
I rejoice that some one has taken hold of this subject at last. It
needs only to be understood to be adopted; for I can not see from what
quarter any opposition to it can arise. You rightly observe that “all
the educational institutions of the several States” are interested in
this mode of appointment. Great Britain, France, and many of the
Continental States admit to their military schools the most competent
young men who present themselves, and the method is found to be as
economical as it is equitable. Long years of _winnowing_ is saved to the
Government; for the subjects who present themselves are, of course, the
most capable. For several years I was a witness of the beneficial
effects produced on youth in France by the stimulation of their energies
in order to undergo an examination for admission into the military or
naval schools. Our present mode of appointment appears to be an anomaly;
for while monarchies find it expedient to adopt a less exclusive mode of
sustaining their military organizations, we still cling to one founded
on patronage and prerogative. Many of our young men in different
colleges and educational institutions have a taste and vocation to the
military profession, and have an equal right to compete for a place in
the only fields where such a taste can be gratified--viz., in the army
and navy. These careers should then be open to them. There is danger and
want of policy in suppressing the legitimate aspirations of young men in
a nation which is, say what we can, passionately fond of military glory.
EXTRACT from the Report of the Board of Visitors of the U.S. Military
Academy at West Point for 1864.
The main features of the Report of the Visitors for 1863 we most
cordially approve, especially its recommendations of competitive
examination, and raising the age and qualifications of candidates for
admission. The only student who obtained his appointment through
competitive examination (introduced into his district by the member of
Congress upon whose recommendation he was appointed from the common
schools[15] of New York) graduated at the head of his class this year.
[Footnote 15: The successful candidate, out of twenty competitors,
was a member of the Free Academy of the city of New York, and
stood in scholarship about the middle of his class.]
The beneficial effect on schools, as regards both pupils and teachers,
of throwing open appointments in civil, as well as in military and naval
service, to competition, and giving them to the most meritorious
candidates, on examination, is thus commented on in the Report of the
Queen’s Commissioners on the Endowed Schools of Ireland:
This measure has received the unanimous approval of our body, who
regard it as an effectual method of promoting intermediate education.
The experience already obtained respecting the operation of public and
competitive examinations, so far as they have hitherto been tried,
leaves no doubt on our minds that the extension of this system would,
under judicious management, produce very beneficial effects, both in
raising the standard of instruction, and in stimulating the efforts of
masters and of pupils. The educational tests adapted for examinations
for the public service would be, in our opinion, of all others the most
general in their character, and therefore, those best calculated to
direct the efforts of teachers to that course of mental discipline and
moral training, the attainment of which constitutes, in our opinion, the
chief object of a liberal education. The experience of the civil service
commission has shown the shortcomings of all classes in the most general
and most elementary branches of a literary and scientific education.
These views are strongly corroborated by the testimony, appended to
the Report, of prominent teachers and educators consulted on the
subject:
Prof. Bullen, in the Queen’s College, Cork, remarks:--“No movement
ever made will so materially advance education in this country as the
throwing open public situations to meritorious candidates. It has given
already a great impulse to schools and will give greater. The
consequence of throwing the civil service open to the public is already
beginning to tell--although only in operation a few months, it has told
in a most satisfactory manner in this city; and, from what I can see, it
will have the happiest results on education generally.”
Prof. King, Head Master of a Grammar School at Ennis, writes:--“These
examinations have already caused improvements in my own school by
inducing me to give instruction in branches which I had never taught
before.”
The Dean of Elphin, the Archdeacon of Waterford and the Bishop of
Doun, advocate the measure on the ground of its tendency to produce
competition between schools, and to stimulate private enterprise. The
Bishop of Cashel “thought that this competition would be more valuable
than the endowment of schools giving education gratuitously.”
In confirmation of the above views, and as an illustration of the
benefits likely to accrue both to the cause of education and to the
public service from the extension of the system of competitive
examinations, we may add that, at the late competitive examination for
certificates of merit held by the Royal Dublin Society Mr. Samuel
Chapman, who was educated solely by the Incorporated Society, as a
foundation boy, obtained the first place and a prize of £5. In
consequence of this success the Bank of Ireland immediately appointed
him to a clerkship. Mr. Chapman was originally elected to the Pococke
Institution, from a parish school, by a competitive examination; and on
his leaving the Santry school Prof. Galbraith appointed him his
assistant in Trinity College, in consequence of the skill in drawing
which he exhibited, and his knowledge of mathematics, as proved by his
final examination.
III. COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION AT WEST POINT.
DEBATE IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE, MAY 18TH, 1864.
The Bill making appropriation for the Military Academy being under
consideration, Senator Anthony, of R. Island, remarked on the following
amendment:
_And be it further enacted_, That hereafter, in all appointments of
cadets to the Military Academy at West Point, the selections for such
appointments in the several districts shall be made from the candidates
according to their respective merits and qualifications, to be
determined under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of War
shall from time to time prescribe.
This, Mr. President, is substantially the proposition which I offered at
the last session; and although I was not so fortunate as to obtain for
it the assent of the Senate, mainly from an apprehension of practical
difficulties in carrying out what is admitted to be a desirable reform
if it could be effected, yet the general expression of Senators was so
much in favor of the principle, and I have been so much strengthened in
my views on the subject by subsequent reflection and examination, that I
am emboldened to renew it.
I differ entirely from those who are fond of disparaging the Military
Academy. It has been of incalculable service to the country; it is the
origin and the constant supply of that military science without which
mere courage would be constantly foiled, and battles would be but Indian
fights on a large scale. Not to speak of the Mexican war, throughout the
whole of which West Point shone with conspicuous luster, it is safe to
leave the vindication of the Academy to the gallant and able men who
have illustrated the annals of the war that is now raging. Nor have its
indirect advantages been less marked than its direct. It has kept alive
a military spirit, and kept up a good standard of military instruction
in the volunteer militia. It furnished, from its graduates who have
retired from the Army, scores of men who rushed to the head of our new
levies, who organized and instructed them, inspired them with
confidence, and led them over many a bloody field to many a glorious
victory. Large numbers of our best volunteer officers owe their
instruction indirectly to West Point.
To say that no course of military instruction can make a pupil a
military genius, can create in him that rare quality that takes in at a
glance, almost by intuition, the relative strength of great masses
opposed to each other, and that power of combination which can bring an
inferior force always in greater number upon the severed portions of a
superior force, is very true. To discard military education on that
account would be like shutting up the schools and colleges because they
can not turn out Miltons and Burkes and Websters. Education does not
create, it develops and enlarges and inspires and elevates. It will make
the perfect flower, the majestic tree, from the little seed; but it must
have the seed. And what I desire is that the Academy at West Point
should have the best seed; that its great resources, its careful
culture, its scientific appliances, should not be wasted on second-rate
material. The Academy has never had a fair chance; the country has not
had a fair chance; the boys have not had a fair chance. This is what I
want them all to have, and especially the country. I desire that the
Academy shall begin, as it goes on, upon the competitive principle. As
all its standing, all its honors, are won by competition, so should the
original right to compete for them be won. I would give all the youth of
the country a fair chance; and, more desirable than that, I would give
the country a fair chance for all its youth. I would have the Academy
filled up by those young men who, upon examination by competent judges,
should be found most likely to render the best service to the country;
to make the best officers; whose qualifications, physical, intellectual,
and moral, whose tastes and habits, should seem to best fit them for
military life.
But, it is objected, no such examination would be infallible. Of course
it would not be. No human judgment is infallible. Our deliberations are
not infallible; but therefore shall we not deliberate? The decisions of
the Supreme Court are not infallible; therefore shall we abolish the
court?
A SENATOR. The Senator from New Hampshire would say yes.
MR. ANTHONY. I know the Senator from New Hampshire [Mr. HALE] would say
“Yes.” He would abolish both the Academy and the Court, and I can well
suppose that the policy which would abolish the one might abolish the
other. But although such an examination would not be infallible, it
would, if properly organized and properly conducted, accomplish much
toward the reform which all admit to be desirable, if it be practicable.
It can not be doubted that the young men who would come out best from
such a trial would, as a body, be superior to those who are selected
upon mere personal preferences, and these preferences generally not for
themselves, but for their parents; not for their own qualifications, but
as a recognition of the political services of their fathers.
But, again, it was objected when I made this proposition a year ago that
it was not equal; because, in giving to any given place of examination,
some young men would have further to travel than others! If this
objection had not been gravely made by men for whom I have the highest
respect I should be tempted to call it puerile. A boy asks the privilege
of going a hundred miles to the place of examination, and is told that
he can not have it because another boy will have to go two hundred
miles, and another but fifty, and it is not equal! The fact that either
of them would go five hundred miles on foot for the opportunity of
competition is not taken into the account. On the same principle our
elections are not equal, for one man must travel further than another to
reach the polls. For a boy who can not obtain the means to travel from
his home to the place of examination--and there will be very few such of
those who would be likely to pass high in the examination--the plan
proposed would be no worse, certainly, than the present system; for
those who have the means the difference in travel is too small an item
to enter into the account.
No plan can be made perfectly equal. Shall we therefore refuse to make a
large advance toward equality? Certainly the system which invites a
competition from all who are in a condition to avail themselves of it is
more equal than that which excludes all competition. But although
equality in the advantages of the Academy is very desirable, and
although the amendment proposed would be a long step in that direction,
it is not for that reason that I urge it. It is not to give all the
young men an equal chance for the Academy, it is to give the Academy a
chance for the best young men; and although even under this system the
best young men will often fail of success, it can not be doubted that
many more of them will enter the service than under the present system.
Nor will the advantages of this competition be confined to those who
reach the prize for which so many will struggle. An incalculable
although an incidental benefit will accrue to the thousands whose
youthful hearts will be stirred by an honorable ambition, and who will
cultivate their minds by liberal studies and develop their physical
power by manly exercises in the struggle upon which the humblest may
enter, and in which the proudest can obtain only what he fairly earns.
Under the present system the Academy wastes full half its strength upon
boys who never ought to be admitted, and whose natural incapacity
derives but little benefit from the partial training that they receive
there. Under the system proposed, the Academy would exert its influence
upon thousands of the brightest and most aspiring boys all over the
country, stimulating them to the pursuit of such studies and to the
formation of such habits as, if they fail to carry them to West Point,
will help to conduct them to usefulness and honor in whatever path of
life they may choose.
But, again, we are met with the objection that this proposition is
impracticable, that it looks very well on paper, but that it can not be
carried into effect. Let us see. It is quite safe to conclude that what
has been done can be done, and that what wise and judicious people do,
and persist in doing after experiment, is proper to be done. What is the
most warlike nation of Europe? What nation of Europe has carried
military science to the highest degree? What nation of Europe has the
greatest genius for organization? You will say the French. Let us see
what is their system. I read from the report of the Commission appointed
by Congress in 1860 to visit the Military Academy at West Point, and
report upon the system of instruction; a commission of which you, Mr.
President, [Mr. FOOT,] were a member:
Among the European systems of military education that of France is
preëminent. The stimulating principle of competition extends throughout
the whole system; it exists in the appointment of the student, in his
progress through the preliminary schools, in his transfer to the higher
schools, in his promotion to the Army, and in his advancement in his
subsequent career. The distinguishing features of the French system are
thus described by the British commissioners.
“1. The proportion, founded apparently upon principle, which officers
educated in military schools are made to bear to those promoted for
service from the ranks. 2. The mature age at which military education
begins. 3. The system of thorough competition on which it is founded.
4. The extensive State assistance afforded to successful candidates for
entrance into military schools whenever their circumstances require it.
* * * * * *
Admission to the military schools of France can only be gained through
a public competitive examination by those who have received the degree
of bachelor of science from the lycées or public schools, and from the
orphan school of La Flèche.
A powerful influence has thus been exercised upon the character of
education in France. The importance of certain studies has been
gradually reduced, while those of a scientific character, entering more
directly into the pursuits of life, have been constantly elevated.
The two great elementary military schools are the School of St. Cyr
and the Polytechnic School. These, as well as the other military
schools, are under the charge of the Minister of War, with whom the
authorities of the schools are in direct communication. Commissions in
the infantry, cavalry, and marines can only be obtained by service in
the ranks of the army, or by passing successfully through the School of
St. Cyr, admission to which is gained by the competitive examination
already referred to.”
Again, the Commission say, speaking of the School of St. Cyr:
The admission is by competitive examination, open to all youths,
French by birth or by naturalization, who, on the 1st of January
preceding their candidature, were not less than sixteen and not more
than twenty years old. To this examination are also admitted soldiers in
the ranks between twenty and twenty-five years, who, at the date of its
commencement, have been actually in service in their regiments for two
years.
A board of examiners passes through France once every year, and
examines all who present themselves having the prescribed
qualifications.
A list of such candidates as are found eligible for admission to St.
Cyr is submitted to the Minister of War. The number of vacancies has
already been determined, and the candidates admitted are taken in the
order of merit.
Twenty-seven, or sometimes a greater number, are annually, at the
close of their second year of study, placed in competition with
twenty-five candidates from the second lieutenants belonging to the
army, if so many are forthcoming, for admission to the Staff School of
Paris. This advantage is one object which serves as a stimulus to
exertion, the permission being given according to rank in the
classification by order of merit.
In regard to the Polytechnic School, the Commission say:
Admission to the School is, and has been since its first commencement
in 1794, obtained by competition in a general examination, held yearly,
and open to all. Every French youth between the ages of sixteen and
twenty (or if in the army up to the age of twenty-five) may offer
himself as a candidate.
This is the system which was organized by Carnot and adopted and
extended by Napoleon. Under this system the French army has attained its
perfection of organization, its high discipline, its science, its dash,
and its efficiency.
But not the French alone have adopted the competitive system. In
England, all whose traditions are aristocratical, where promotion in the
army has so long been made by patronage and by purchase, the sturdy
common sense of the nation has pushed away the obstructions that have
blocked up the avenues to the army, and have opened them to merit, come
from what quarter it may. In the commencement of the Crimean war, the
English people were shocked at the evident inferiority of their army to
the French. Their officers did not know how to take care of their men,
or how to fight them. And although in the end British pluck and British
persistence vindicated themselves as they always have and always will,
it was not till thousands of lives had been sacrificed that might have
been saved under a better system. No French officer would have permitted
that memorable charge at Balaklava, which was as remarkable for the
stupidity that ordered it as for the valor that executed it, and which
has been sung in verses nearly as bad as the generalship which they
celebrate. After the war, the English Government, with the practical
good sense which usually distinguishes it, came, without difficulty, to
the conclusion that merit was better than family in officering the army,
and that it was more desirable to put its epaulets upon the shoulder of
those who could take care of the men and lead them properly than upon
those who could trace their descent to the Conqueror, or whose uncles
could return members of Parliament. Accordingly, the Royal Military
Academy, which had been filled, as ours is, by patronage, was thrown
open to public competition. On this subject I quote from the very
interesting and valuable report of the Visitors of the Military Academy
in 1863:
The same principle was applied to appointments and promotion in the
new regiments called for by the exigencies of the great war in which
England found herself engaged.
Subjects, time, and place of examination were officially made known
throughout the kingdom, and commissions to conduct the examinations were
appointed, composed of men of good common sense, military officers, and
eminent practical teachers and educators. The results, as stated in a
debate in Parliament five years later, on extending this principle to
all public schools, and all appointments and promotions in every
department of the public service, were as follows: in the competitive
examinations for admission to the Royal Military Academy candidates from
all classes of society appeared--sons of merchants, attorneys,
clergymen, mechanics, and noblemen, and among the successful competitors
every class was represented. Among the number was the son of a mechanic
in the arsenal at Woolwich, and the son of an earl who was at that time
a cabinet minister--the graduates of national schools, and the students
of Eton, and other great public schools.
On this point Mr. Edward Chadwick, in a report before the National
Social Science Association, at Cambridge in 1862, says:
“Out of an average three hundred patronage-appointed cadets at the
Royal Military Academy at Woolwich, for officers of engineers and the
artillery, during the five years preceding the adoption of the principle
of open competition for admission to the Academy, there were fifty who
were, after long and indulgent trial and with a due regard to
influential parents and patrons, dismissed for hopeless incapacity for
the service of those scientific corps. During the five subsequent years,
which have been years of the open-competition principle, there has not
been one dismissed for incapacity. Moreover, the general standard of
capacity has been advanced. An eminent professor of this university, who
has taught as well under the patronage as under the competitive system
at that Academy, declares that the quality of mind of the average of the
cadets has been improved by the competition, so much so that he
considers that the present average quality of the mind of cadets there,
though the sorts of attainment are different, has been brought up to the
average of the first-class men of this (Cambridge) university, which of
itself is a great gain. Another result, the opposite to that which was
confidently predicted by the opponents to the principle, has been that
the average physical power or bodily strength, instead of being
diminished, is advanced beyond the average of their predecessors.”
I read this also from the same report:
Another result of immense importance to the educational interests of
Great Britain has followed the introduction of these open competitive
examinations for appointments to the military and naval schools, to the
East India service, as well as to fill vacancies in the principal
clerkships in the war, admiralty, ordnance, and home departments of the
Government. A stimulus of the most healthy and powerful kind, worth more
than millions of pecuniary endowment, has been given to all the great
schools of the country, including the universities of England, Scotland,
and Ireland. As soon as it was known that candidates, graduates of
Trinity College, Dublin, had succeeded over competitors from Oxford and
Edinburg in obtaining valuable appointments in the East India service,
the professors in the latter universities began to look to their
laurels. As soon as it was known to the master of any important school
that some of his leading pupils might compete in these examinations, and
that his own reputation as a teacher depended in a measure on the
success or failure of these pupils, he had a new motive to impart the
most vigorous and thorough training.
Such has been the result in France and in England. We are not without
examples at home. The competitive system has been tried in repeated
instances here in the appointments both to the Military and the Naval
Academy. Several Representatives in Congress, with a conscientious sense
of the responsibility resting upon them, have given their patronage to
the result of general competition, among them the gentleman who so ably
represented, in the last Congress, the district in which I live. The
results have been most satisfactory. Here, again, I will quote from the
report of the Board of Visitors for 1863:
The principle itself, of selection by merit, either in the mode of
public examination or of careful and searching inquiry by competent and
impartial educators designated for this purpose by the parties to whom
custom, and not law, had assigned the grave responsibility of nominating
candidates, has been voluntarily applied in several Congressional
districts. Not a cadet known to have been thus selected and appointed
has ever broken down from want of vigor of body or mind, or failed to
reach and maintain an honorable position on the merit-roll of the
Academy; and to this careful selection by those who felt the
responsibility of the privilege accorded to them is the country indebted
for its most eminent and useful officers.
The same report makes some observations on another point:
To the objection that selection by public competitive examination will
involve expense, we reply that any expense which will do away with the
prejudices against the Academy, which the present system of patronage
has done so much directly and indirectly to evoke and foster, and which
will, at the same time, exclude incompetent and secure the services of
vigorous, talented, well-trained officers for every arm of the service,
will be well incurred. But in our opinion there will be no more expense
in selecting and educating a given number of cadets on this plan than on
the present. The two thousand cadets who were appointed by patronage and
failed to graduate, cost the Government, directly and indirectly, each
year a much larger sum than it would have taken to have excluded them in
advance from the institution by competitive examination and filling
their places by better men; and their exclusion by substituting better
material would have been an incalculable gain to the Academy,
facilitating its discipline, increasing the value of its instruction,
and giving to the Army a larger number of competent officers.
Even under the despotic government of Austria the competitive system has
been adopted for the higher places, and it has been adopted by Prussia
and Italy. In Austria every subject can claim admission into the
military schools on payment of the cost of his instruction; and all the
appointments to the staff are on the competitive system. On this subject
I read from the work upon Military Education and Schools, by Hon. Henry
Barnard, who stands in the very front rank of the great educators, and
who gives, to the competitive system the weight of a name which alone
should incline us strongly in its favor:
The yearly examinations, the manner in which the marks of the monthly
examinations tell on the final one, and the careful classification of
the pupils in the order of merit, reminded us of the system of the
Polytechnic more than any other school we have seen. * * * *
The arrangements for the general staff-school require more remark.
In our report upon Austrian schools we have specially noticed this
school as remarkable for its thorough and open competitive character
from first to last, and its very sensible plan of study. Admission to it
is by competition, open to officers of all arms. The pupils are not
unduly overburdened with work; perhaps there is even room for one or two
more subjects of importance; but what is done seems to be done
thoroughly. The officers are carefully ranked on leaving the school,
according as the abilities they have displayed may be considered a
criterion of their fitness for employment on the general staff; and in
this order they enter the staff corps. The consequence is that every
officer knows distinctly, from the time that he first competes for
admission until his final examination on leaving, that the order in
which he will enter the staff depends entirely on his own exertions and
success at the school. It seemed to us that this open competition
produced a spirit of confidence and energy in the students as great, if
not greater, than any we met with elsewhere.
I quote from the same work in regard to the military education in
Sardinia:
Admission into the artillery and engineer school may be considered the
reward of the most distinguished pupils of the _Accademia Militare_,
who, after spending their last year in that institution in the study of
the higher mathematics, chemistry, and architectural drawing, are
transferred for the completion of their education to the school of the
artillery and engineers.
The staff-school, the formation of which dates from 1850, is chiefly
frequented by officers of the infantry and cavalry, who must be below
the age of twenty-eight years upon their entrance. It is carried on upon
the competitive final examination, the ablest entering the staff corps
in that order.
In the same work Mr. Barnard characterizes the Staff-School at Vienna:
The most striking features in the system of this school, both at the
entrance and throughout the course, are, that it is distinctly
competitive, that it admits very young officers, and that while the work
is considerable, the subjects for study are not numerous. In these three
points it differs considerably from the Prussian staff-school, in which
the students are generally older, and the principle of competition is
not so fully carried out. In the Austrian school the students are
placed, on entering, in the order which their entrance examination has
just fixed. They are examined once a month during their stay. On leaving
the school their respective places are again determined, and they have a
claim for appointments in the staff corps in the exact order in which
they were placed on leaving the school. In Belgium, the competitive
system is fully adopted.
The following testimony is from a report on the progress of the
principle of competitive examination for admission into the public
service, read before Section F. Economic Science and Statistics of the
British Association for the Advancement of Science, at Leeds, September
27, 1858, by Edward Chadwick:
Mr. Canon Mosely attests that the “qualifications of the whole” body
of competitive candidates appeared to rise above the general “level of
the education of the country.” It is stated in evidence before the
commissioners for inquiring into the means of improving the sanitary
condition of the army, that this was most decidedly so of the whole body
of competing candidates for medical appointments in the East India
service. Mr. Canon Mosely concludes his report on the last year’s
experience in the following terms: “With reference to the general scope
and tendency of competitive examinations, I may perhaps be permitted the
observation, that the consciousness which success in such examinations
brings with it in early life of a power to act resolutely on a
determinate plan, and to achieve a difficult success, contributes more
than the consciousness of talent to the formation of a manly and
honorable character, and to success on whatever career a man may enter.”
The report of the last Board of Visitors at West Point, from which I
have read, I believe has not yet been printed by Congress; I have read
from a pamphlet copy of it printed in the Journal of Education. The
Board was composed, as it usually is, of men of high character and
ability. After a full and laborious examination of the whole subject,
they unanimously and earnestly recommend the adoption of the competitive
system.
If the appointments to fill and maintain the corps at this maximum
[four hundred] can be selected out of the many American youths ambitious
to serve their country in the Army, on the plan of an open competitive
examination in the several States, the Visitors believe that ninety out
of every one hundred thus appointed will go through the whole course
with honor, and the average ability, scholarship, and good conduct of
the whole corps will equal that now reached by the first ten of each
class.
With such experience of other nations, with such examples at home,
I submit that we may safely in this republican country give our young
men the privileges that are conceded in imperial France and in
aristocratic England; that we may safely place competition against
patronage, and give to modest merit a chance with pretentious
imbecility. I would go somewhat further in the competitive system.
I would not have the Army or the Navy officered exclusively by the
graduates of the national Academies. If any young man, at his own
expense, and by his own study and aptitude for the profession, has
fitted himself for a command in either, let the competition be open to
him equally with those who have been instructed at the public expense,
and let the epaulets rest on the shoulders that are most worthy to wear
them. But I do not propose to follow the subject to this extent at
present. I shall be abundantly content if the Senate will adopt the
competitive system, which has worked so well in other countries and so
well here as far as it has been tried, in the Military Academy.
TABLE VII.--SUMMARY OF EXAMINATIONS FOR ADMISSION TO THE UNITED STATES
MILITARY ACADEMY FOR FIFTEEN YEARS, FROM 1856 TO 1870, INCLUSIVE.
[Transcriber’s Note:
The following tables were printed sideways, on two pairs of facing
pages. Each has been rearranged for this e-text. The table labeled
“Rejections for Literary incompetency”, was originally part of the
main Table VIII. Under “Table VIII, Continued”, the information for
the two Academies has been split into separate tables.]
[KEY]
C Candidates.
A Accepted, total.
T Total.
PD Physical Disability
15Y During fifteen years. [_1856-1870: See second table_]
W Writing, including orthography.
R Reading.
A Arithmetic.
Ge Geography.
Gr Grammar.
H History.
---------------+-----+-----+------------------------------------
| | | Rejected.
| | +---+--------------------------------
| | | | On what account.
| | | +--------------------------------
| | | | | Literary incompetency.
Appointed | | | | +---+------------------------
from-- | | | | | | Deficient in--
| | | | | +---+---+---+---+---+----
| C | A | T |PD |15Y| W | R | A |Ge |Gr | H
+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
| No.| No.|No.|No.|No.|No.|No.|No.|No.|No.| No.
---------------+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----
Alabama | 32| 20| 12| 1| 11| 5| 3| 4| 7| 7| 7
Arkansas | 10| 7| 3| 1| 2| 1| 1| 1| 1| 2| ..
California | 15| 12| 3| ..| 3| ..| ..| 2| 3| 2| 3
Connecticut | 22| 14| 8| 2| 6| 2| ..| 4| 1| 2| 2
Delaware | 11| 6| 5| ..| 5| 2| 2| 4| 3| 3| 4
Florida | 4| 4| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Georgia | 32| 23| 9| ..| 9| 7| 2| 7| 4| 3| 5
Illinois | 55| 47| 8| 1| 7| 5| 1| 1| 2| 4| 1
Indiana | 67| 46| 21| 2| 19| 17| 8| 9| 3| 3| 3
Iowa | 24| 19| 5| 1| 4| 4| 3| 3| ..| ..| ..
Kansas | 6| 3| 3| ..| 3| 2| ..| 1| 2| 1| 1
Kentucky | 60| 43| 17| ..| 17| 8| 5| 9| 7| 6| 6
Louisiana | 18| 14| 4| 1| 3| 2| ..| 3| 1| 1| 1
Maine | 26| 22| 4| ..| 4| 3| ..| 2| 3| 1| 2
Maryland | 32| 25| 7| 2| 5| 3| 2| 3| 1| 1| 1
Massachusetts | 43| 42| 1| ..| 1| ..| ..| ..| 1| ..| ..
Michigan | 29| 20| 9| 1| 8| 6| ..| 3| ..| 2| 3
Minnesota | 11| 9| 2| ..| 2| 2| ..| 1| ..| ..| ..
Mississippi | 24| 16| 8| 1| 7| 4| 4| 4| 6| 5| 5
Missouri | 48| 32| 16| 1| 15| 12| 6| 7| 1| 6| 3
Nebraska | 5| 4| 1| ..| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| 1| 1
Nevada | 7| 1| 6| ..| 6| 1| ..| 3| 1| 3| 1
New Hampshire | 14| 12| 2| 1| 1| 1| ..| ..| 1| ..| 1
New Jersey | 27| 25| 2| 1| 1| ..| ..| 1| ..| ..| 1
New York | 157| 128| 29| 4| 25| 15| 1| 6| 6| 10| 6
North Carolina | 32| 26| 6| ..| 6| 2| 1| 4| 1| ..| 1
Ohio | 111| 80| 31| 4| 27| 18| 13| 9| 3| 6| 4
Oregon | 4| 3| 1| ..| 1| ..| ..| 1| ..| ..| ..
Pennsylvania | 127| 101| 26| 6| 20| 13| 6| 10| 4| 5| 4
Rhode Island | 7| 7| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
South Carolina | 22| 17| 5| 1| 4| 2| ..| 3| 1| 2| 2
Tennessee | 48| 33| 15| 3| 12| 10| 4| 3| 3| 2| 2
Texas | 8| 5| 3| ..| 3| 1| ..| 3| 2| 1| 1
Vermont | 13| 12| 1| ..| 1| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Virginia | 46| 34| 12| 1| 11| 8| 4| 6| 3| 3| 2
West Virginia | 10| 6| 4| 1| 3| 2| 1| 1| 1| 1| ..
Wisconsin | 27| 20| 7| 2| 5| 3| 1| 3| ..| 1| ..
Dist. Columbia | 6| 5| 1| ..| 1| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Colorado Ter. | 4| 2| 2| ..| 2| 1| 1| 1| 1| 1| ..
New Mexico | 5| 4| 1| ..| 1| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Utah Ter. | 3| 3| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Washington Ter.| 4| 4| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Dakota Ter. | 3| 3| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Arizona Ter. | 2| 2| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Idaho Ter. | 4| | 4| ..| 4| 2| ..| 3| 2| 3| 2
Montana | 1| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
Wyoming Ter. | 1| 1| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..| ..
At large | 192| 170| 22| 3| 19| 7| 7| 8| 6| 9| 6
+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
Grand totals |1,459|1,133|326| 41|285|173| 76|133| 80| 98|81
---------------+-----+-----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
REJECTIONS FOR LITERARY INCOMPETENCY, BY YEAR: