EUDOCIA was crowned in 1067, on the death of her husband, and

reigned alone but one year. She was expelled from the palace,

and lingered in obscurity till the time of Anna Comnena, who

saw her alive in 1096.

ROMANUS IV., (Diogenes,) was crowned in 1068, and was killed

in 1071. He had married Eudocia, and was nominated to the

crown in prejudice of her sons. He was taken prisoner by the

Turks, who scooped out his eyes; of which he died, covered

with worms, and in extreme misery.

MICHAEL VII.,(Parapinace,) crowned in 1071, and resigned in

1078, and retired to a monastery. He was called Parapinace

because he had suffered the bushel of corn to be reduced to

the size of a quart. He associated his two brothers with

him in the empire, under the names of Andronicus I. and

Constantine XII.

NICEPHORUS III., (Botoniates,) was crowned 1078: he resigned

in 1081, and entered a monastery. In his reign, Doomsday Book

began to be compiled in England, to ascertain the tenure of

estates.

_Restoration of the Family of Comnenus._

ALEXIUS I., (Comnenus,) was crowned in 1081, and died in 1118.

He lived to the age of seventy-one, and reigned thirty-seven.

His daughter, Anna Comnena, illustrated this era by her

writings. The history of her father’s eventful reign is yet

extant. In England, William Rufus and Henry I. were his

contemporaries, and the first crusade commenced. JOHANNES II.,

(Comnenus,) Kalojohannes, began his reign in 1118, and died in

1143, of the wound of a poisoned arrow, accidentally inflicted

by himself. He obtained the name of Kalojohannes for his

personal beauty. His contemporary in England was Stephen.

MANUEL I., (Comnenus,) was crowned in 1143, and died in 1180.

In his reign the canon law was drawn up, and the second

crusade commenced.

ALEXIUS II., (Comnenus,) was crowned in 1180, and died in

1183. He was murdered by his successor Andronicus.

ANDRONICUS I., (Comnenus,) was crowned in 1183, and died in

1185. He was cruelly put to death, also, by his successor, who

caused his eyes to be put out, and his hands cut off, and then

led him through the city, seated on a camel, when he was torn

in pieces by the multitude.

ISAAK II., (Angelus,) was crowned in 1185, and in 1195 his

eyes were put out. In his reign the third crusade commenced.

His contemporary in England was Richard I.

ALEXIUS III., (Angelus) was crowned in 1195, and died in 1204.

The deposition of his brother Isaak was the pretext to the

Crusaders for the sack of Constantinople.

ISAAK III., ALEXIUS IV., ALEXIUS V., (Ducas Mourzoufle,) 1203.

In six months, five emperors were crowned at Constantinople;

three were murdered, and two fled. Mourzoufle (so called from

his dark eyebrows) was cast from the monument of Theodosius.

The Crusaders took and sacked the city, and the empire was

partitioned: Lascaris obtained Nicæa and Bythinia; Alexius,

Trebisond; and Michael, Epirus.

_Frank Family._

BALDWIN I., (Robert,) crowned in 1204. He was drawn into an

ambush by the Greeks and Bulgarians, by whom some say he was

cut to pieces. He never afterwards appeared. Aristotle’s works

were now first brought from Constantinople, Ghengis Khan

reigned in Tartary, and Magna Charta was extorted from king

John in England.

HENRY was called to the throne on the supposed death of his

brother in 1206, and reigned 10 years.

BALDWIN II. was crowned in 1228; deposed in 1261. He fled

to Italy. The Latin dynasty was extinguished, and the Greek

restored. The Inquisition was established in the Latin church.

Henry III. reigned in England.

_Family of the Palæologi._

MICHAEL VIII., (Palæologus) crowned in 1262; died in 1283. He

was regent during the minority of John Lascaris, whom he put

to death. He endeavoured to effect an union between the Greek

and Latin churches without success. The Mamelukes now seized

on Egypt. Edward I. reigned in England.

Andronicus II., (Palæologus,) was crowned in 1283, and

abdicated in 1328. He retired to a monastery, where he lived

to the age of seventy-four. The Turks seized on Bythinia, and

Othman established his capital at Brusa. From him they are

since called Ottomans, or Osmanli. Edward II. reigned in

England.

ANDRONICUS III., (Palæologus,) crowned in 1328, having deposed

his grandfather, with whom he had been associated. He died of

an irregular life in 1341. Edward III. reigned in England.

JOHANNES III., (Cantacuzene,) was crowned in 1342, and

abdicated in 1355. He retired, with his wife, to a monastery,

where he lived till 1411. He there composed the “History of

his own Time,” which is still extant. In his reign the Turks

first entered Europe.

JOHANNES IV., (Palæologus,) was crowned on his father

Andronicus’s death, in 1341, and died in 1391. In his reign

Amurath took Adrianople, and established a capital in Europe.

Richard II. reigned in England.

MANUEL II., (Palæologus,) was crowned sole emperor in 1391,

and died in 1425. In his reign, Bajazet laid siege to

Constantinople, which was raised by Tamerlane. Henry IV. and

Henry V. reigned in England.

JOHANNES V., (Palæologus,) crowned sole emperor in 1425, and

died of the gout in 1448. In his reign the art of printing was

first discovered in Europe. Henry VI. was his contemporary of

England.

CONSTANTINUS XIII., by some XI., (Palæologus,) was crowned

in 1448, and killed in 1453. Mohammed took the city of

Constantinople, and put an end to the Greek empire.

Constantine had two brothers−-Demetrius, who basely submitted

to slavery, and permitted his daughter to be received into

the conqueror’s harem; and Thonas, who made vigorous efforts

to rescue Greece from the Ottoman power. He finally retired

to Italy. His children proceeded to England, where he died:

and the ashes of the last of the family of the Greek dynasty

repose among the free in Britain, where their monument is

still to be seen in Llanulph Church in Cornwall. It is

remarkable, that the first Christian emperor of the East was

born, and the descendants of the last, repose in England.

TURKISH DYNASTY

MAHOMET II., (Fatih,) He was proclaimed sultan in 1451, and

took possession of Constantinople on the memorable 29th of

May, 1453. He died of a colic in 1481. The title of Fatih, or

“the Conqueror” was given to him on the occasion, as opening

a way into the Christian capital. He prepared an epitaph to

be placed on his tomb, containing the names of all the kings,

countries, and cities he had conquered. His contemporary in

England was Edward IV.

BAJAZET II. He was proclaimed in 1481, and ceased to reign in

1512. His son Selim had appointed for him a place of retreat

such as he wished, but in the meantime had corrupted his

physician, who poisoned him at Tzurallo. His contemporaries in

England were Edward V., Richard III., Henry VII., and Henry

VIII.

SELIM I. (Yavuz) began his reign in 1512, and died of a fever

in 1520. His contemporary in England was Henry VIII.

SOLIMAN I. (by some II.) (Kanuni) began his reign in 1520;

and terminated it in 1566. He is generally called in Europe

the “Magnificent,” but by Turks, Kanuni, or the “Institutor,”

as he drew up a list of institutes by which the kingdom was

afterwards to be governed, instead of those traditions which

had before been their unwritten law. His contemporaries in

England were, Henry VIII., Edward VI., Mary, and Elizabeth.

SELIM II. succeeded his father Soliman in 1566; he died

in 1574. Contrary to the usual temperament of a Turkish

sovereign, he was fond of peace, and sighed for repose,

particularly after the loss of the terrible battle of Lepanto,

in which Cervantes lost an arm. His contemporary in England

was Elizabeth.

AMURATH III. succeeded his father Selim in 1574; and died

in 1595; a victim to melancholy and a morbid imagination.

The discharge of a cannon broke the windows of his kiosk,

as he reclined on his divan. Supposing that this portended

his death, he died in a fever under that impression. His

contemporary in England was Elizabeth, who wrote him a Latin

letter.

MOHAMMED III. succeeded to the throne on the death of his

father Mohammed in 1595; he died in 1603. He drowned all the

odalisks, or female slaves, of the seraglio, suspected of

pregnancy, and put to death nineteen of his brothers on the

first day of his elevation. He, from policy, was advised by

his mother to affect a dissipated life, and contracted a habit

which he could not afterwards get rid of. He died prematurely

of excess. His only contemporary in England was Elizabeth.

ACHMET I. came to the throne in 1603; and died in 1607. He

escaped the fate usually attendant on a younger brother in

Turkey, by the premature death of his elder. His life was

attempted by a Dervish, who hurled a large stone on him from

the roof of a house, which bruised his shoulder. He supposed

that dogs communicated the plague, and he ordered them all to

be killed; but the mufti saved them, by affirming that every

dog had a soul. His contemporary in England was James I.

OSMAN, or OTHMAN II. succeeded his father Achmet in 1617; he

was strangled by the janissaries in 1621, at the early age

of nineteen years. A meteoric phenomenon, which assumed the

appearance of a huge cymeter, was seen in the sky in his reign

for a month, which the Turks were persuaded portended to them

the conquest of the world. Charles I. was his contemporary in

England.

_Mustapha I._ was dragged from prison, and set on the throne

by the janissaries in 1621, on the death of his nephew

Osman. In 1623 he was compelled to resign by the turbulent

janissaries, and re-entered the prison from which they had

taken him. James I. reigned in England.

AMURATH IV. began his reign in 1624; and ended it in 1640;

having hastened his death by an intemperate use of wine and

ardent spirits, so as to break down a strong constitution at

the age of thirty-one. He had conceived the extraordinary

projects of extinguishing the Ottoman race, by putting his

brother Ibrahim to death; but his own death anticipated

his intention. He annexed Bagdad to the empire. In his

reign, Cyril Lascaris, the Greek patriarch, published, at

the patriarchal press, a confession of eighteen articles,

declaring the faith of the Greeks on these points, similar to

that of the reformed church in Europe. The contemporary reign

in England was that of Charles I.

IBRAHIM, succeeded his brother in 1640, and was strangled by

the janissaries in 1668. He was a miserable-looking man, had

a pale visage, scanty beard, seamed with the small-pox, mean

appearance, spare person, hypochondriac, and subject to the

falling sickness. His contemporary in England was Charles I.

MOHAMMED IV. the son of Ibrahim, ascended the throne in 1648,

at the age of seven years. He was deposed in 1687, and shut

up in the seraglio, where he lingered in solitude four years.

In the year 1666, in this reign, Sabathi Levi, or Sevi,

appeared in Palestine as the expected Messiah, and was invited

to Constantinople by the sultan, who promised to restore

Jerusalem. Multitudes of people, both Turks and Jews, believed

on him. Among other miracles, he professed to be invulnerable;

but when he was set up as a mark to be shot at, his courage

failed, and he confessed the imposture. Contemporary

governments in England, “the Commonwealth,” Charles II.

SOLIMAN II. (III.) brother to the former, succeeded in 1687;

and died in 1691, of a dropsy. He was austere and indisposed

to accept the throne. He passed his whole time in studying

the koran. In his reign Lewin Warner, the Dutch ambassador at

the Port, caused the Bible to be translated at Constantinople

into the Turkish language. The MS. remained from that time

shut up in the University of Leyden, till it was discovered,

and lately published by the British and Foreign Bible Society.

Some copies were circulated among the Turks of Constantinople

in the year 1824, which caused a firman to be issued for their

suppression. English sovereigns, Charles II., James II.

ACHMET II. the younger brother of Mohammed, succeeded to

the throne in 1691; he died in 1695. His mind was mean and

powerless, and his person bloated: he had large staring eyes,

and a very long nose. Contemporaries in England, William and

Mary.

MUSTAPHA II. brother to Achmet, succeeded him in 1695; he

abdicated the throne in 1703. His contemporaries in England

were William III. and Anne.

ACHMET III. the brother of Mustapha, succeeded in 1703;

after a reign of twenty-seven years of prosperity, he too

was compelled by the turbulent janissaries, to abdicate the

throne in 1730; the third whom the caprice of the people had

dethroned in fifty years. His contemporaries in England were

Anne, George I., and George II.

MAHMOUD I., or MOHAMMED V., the nephew of Achmet, succeeded

in 1730; he died in 1754, after a mild reign of twenty-four

years. He was condescending and humble, and much regretted. It

is a precept of Islamism, that every man should be prepared

for his destiny, and able to support it by some useful

employment. Many sultans were mechanics, and so was Mahmoud;

he was a cunning worker in ivory, which he wrought with a

dexterity far exceeding that of a Turk. His contemporary in

England was George II.

OTHMAN III. the brother of Mahmoud, succeeded him in 1754; he

died in 1757. His reign was distinguished by the persevering

and sanguinary efforts of the Russians to effect their great

object of advancing to Constantinople, by urging the Greeks to

insurrection. His contemporary in England was George II.

MUSTAPHA III. (Gazi,) nephew of Othman, and son of Achmet

III., began his reign in 1757; and died in 1776. His uncle

had administered poison to himself and two brothers; they

perished, but he survived, and ever after retained the

traces of it. The approximation of Turks to European habits

and improvements, began with him. He ordered Boerhaave and

Machiavel to be translated into Turkish, and commanded his son

to be inoculated; and he founded a library and an academy.

He made vigorous efforts against the Russians, and was thus

called Gazi, “The Victorious.” George III. reigned in England.

ABDUL HAMED, the last of the sons of Achmet III. succeeded in

1776; he died in 1789. His reign, like his predecessors, was

marked by the advance of the Russians to their great object.

Sovereign in England, George III.

SELIM III. the only son of Mustapha, succeeded in 1789, to

the exclusion of the children of Abdul Hamed. He was deposed

by the janissaries in 1807, and afterwards strangled for

attempting to alter their discipline, and establish a nizam

dgeddite, or new corps. He was an amiable and enlightened

prince. Contemporary in England George III.

MUSTAPHA IV. was the eldest son of Abdul Hamed, and succeeded

in 1807; after a brief reign of one year, he too was deposed

in 1808, and afterwards strangled. Sovereign in England George

III.

MAHMOUD II. or MOHAMMED VI. succeeded his brother in 1808.

He extirpated the turbulent janissaries, remodelled the

empire, and, amid more perils, perhaps, than ever sovereign

encountered, he still reigns. He is the thirtieth monarch

of the Ottoman dynasty, and the twenty-fourth on the throne

of Constantinople, and has seen four fill the throne of

England−-George III., George IV., William IV., Victoria.

END OF HISTORICAL SKETCH.

CONSTANTINOPLE AND ITS ENVIRONS.

[Illustration: T. Allom. J. Cousen.

Mosque of Bajazet, Seraskier’s Tower, Yeni Jami, Solimanie, Mahomet,

Selim, Tower of Galata.

CONSTANTINOPLE FROM THE ENTRANCE TO THE GOLDEN HORN.]

THE situations of Oriental cities, in general, possess

advantages, in point of view, of which those in the west are deprived:

London, Paris, Vienna, and St. Petersburg present only flat levels; and

it is necessary to climb some impending height, to obtain a bird’s-eye

view, so as to take in any portion except the first line of houses, and

the tops of a few of the more lofty edifices which rise behind them.

But in the East, every city has its Acropolis: some lofty eminence is

chosen to build on, the summit of which is crowned with a fortress, and

the sloping sides covered with streets and houses. In this way ancient

towns are described by writers, who compare them to amphitheatres,

with their streets, like the seats, rising one above the other.

Constantinople participates in this advantage in an eminent degree.

The approach to this magnificent city, from the Sea of Marmora, is more

beautiful, perhaps, than that of any other city in the world. Before

the spectator lies a romantic archipelago of islands covered with

pine, arbutus, and oak woods, from whence emerges, on every summit,

some monastery of the Greek church. These lovely islets seem to float

upon a sea generally calm and unruffled, and are beautifully reflected

from a surface singularly pure and lucid. Beside them is the coast of

Asia Minor, from which rises, at a distance, the vast contour of Mount

Olympus, not, as the poet describes it, with “cloudy tops,” but usually

unveiled and distinct; its flanks clothed with forests, and its summits

crowned with eternal snows, glittering in sunlight, imparting to the

heated atmosphere below an imagined feeling of refreshing coolness. In

some states of the air, the effect of refraction is so deceptive, that

the mountain seems almost to impend over the spectator.

From hence the coast sweeps round to the mouth of the Bosphorus, in a

recess of which lies the town of Chalcedon. Beside it stretches, for

more than three miles, the great cemetery of the Moslems, the most

extensive, perhaps, in the world; and rising from the plain, and

ascending the side of a hill, is the fine city of Scutari, associated

with early historical recollections. It is of considerable extent,

covering the inclined plain of the hill on which it is built, till the

ascent is terminated by the lofty mountain of Bourgourloo, a detached

portion of the great Bythinian chain. From thence a splendid view is

commanded, including the romantic windings of the Bosphorus, almost for

the whole extent of the strait, from the Euxine to the Propontis.

Below the promontory of Scutari, the Bosphorus rushes out with its

rapid current, and, no longer confined within its narrow shores,

expands itself into the open sea. The limpid torrent, like that of some

great river tumbling down from its source, now wheels and boils, and

creates such commotion that boats are oftentimes dangerously entangled.

On the European shore, and opposite to Scutari, two promontories

project into the Bosphorus. The first is the peninsula of Pera,

its lower part terminated by the ancient city of Galata, where the

enterprising Genoese established one of their commercial marts

under the Greek emperors, and where their language still attests

their origin. The walls, with their ramparts and towers, are still

entire; and the gates are nightly shut by the Turks with the same

vigilant precaution as they were by their former masters. This is the

crowded mart, where merchants of all nations have their stores and

counting-houses, and which the active and busy genius of the Genoese

still seems to animate.

The town of Pera occupies the elevated ridge of a high promontory

between the harbour and the Bosphorus. On the spine of this eminence

the European natives have established their residence. The merchants,

whose stores and offices are below, have their dwelling-houses on

this lofty and healthful elevation, to which they are seen climbing

in groups every evening, when the business of the day is over. Their

habitations form a strong contrast to those of the Turks. They

are lofty, solid, and convenient, and from their height command a

magnificent view of the circumjacent seas, with all their bays and

islands. Here also the ambassadors of the different powers of Europe

have their palaces, among which the British, before its destruction by

fire, was the most beautiful and conspicuous.

Below the promontory of Pera, the noble harbour of “The Golden Horn”

opens to the view, its entrance formed by the points of Galata and

that of the seraglio. Here it is that ships of all nations are seen

floating side by side, and indicating, by the peculiarity of their

structure, the people to which they belong. But the most remarkable and

characteristic are those which are sent from the different parts of the

vast Turkish empire, in Europe, Asia, and Africa.

The enormous vessels that compose the Turkish fleet are the most

conspicuous objects. Some of them rise out of the water with a length

and breadth so imposing, as to excite wonder how a nation, so ignorant

of maritime affairs, and limited in their commercial intercourse,

could have built such stupendous specimens of naval architecture.

Many of them carry 140 brass cannon, of a calibre so enormous on the

lower deck, as to throw balls of 100 lbs. weight. They are navigated

by crews of 2000 men, and seem capable of opening a cannonade that

could instantly sink the largest opponent. The brightness of their

guns of burnished brass, the freshness of their cordage, the snowy

whiteness of their sails, the gaiety and richness of their painting,

always fresh and bright, give an impression that the nation to which

they belong must have brought the art of ship-building to the highest

perfection. On the bow of each is a colossal lion, highly carved and

naturally coloured, which presents the emblem of the Turkish empire

in its most formidable attitude. The first impression made by these

great engines of naval warfare, is the vast superiority they possess,

and the hopelessness of any opposition to them. Yet they are utterly

powerless in the unskilful hands that guide them. The Turks, like their

predecessors the Persians, are impotent by sea; and as the ancient

Greeks with ease destroyed the fleets of the one, so did the modern

Greeks those of the other with their tiny ships. Their small craft,

like fishing-boats, with decayed timbers, ragged sails, and rotten

cordage, which are now sometimes seen in the harbour lying peaceably

beside the Turkish men-of-war, were more than a match for those

gorgeous but unmanageable masses; and their rusty iron guns, whose

explosion sounded like the shot of a pistol in comparison, silenced the

immense batteries of ordnance, that seemed capable of blowing a Greek

island out of the water.

The galleys of Africa next attract attention; these are always

summoned, and ready to join the naval armaments of their sovereign,

like the military vassals of some feudal lord. Their habits of

ferocity, though restrained, still continue; when attached to the

Turkish fleet, they carry ruin and desolation wherever they sail. These

allies destroyed, in Greece, whatever the less merciless Turks had

spared, and would have utterly exterminated the remnant of that people,

had not Christian Europe interfered.

Beside these pirate galleys of the Mediterranean, are to be seen

moored the lofty merchantmen of the Euxine. The singular structure

of these vessels is peculiar to the eastern coasts of the Black Sea,

and has been preserved from the earliest times. These immense and

unwieldy ships rise to a considerable height out of the water, both

at the bow and the stern, and seem altogether incapable of resisting

a gale of wind. They have seldom more than one mast and one immense

mainsail, and seem to move with so infirm a balance, that they totter

along through the water as if about to upset every moment. Approaching

Constantinople, they are overtaken, late in the year, by the violent

north-easter of the Melktem, or the misty weather that then prevails;

and unable to make the narrow entrance of the Bosphorus, or bear up

from a lee-shore, less skilful or less fortunate than the Argonauts,

they are either dashed on the Cyanean rocks, or driven on the sands.

Against this misfortune they adopt many superstitious precautions.

Every vessel has a wreath of blue beads suspended from the prow, as

a protection against the glance of an evil eye, which is supposed to

expend itself on this amulet.

Constantinople and the Scenery of the Seven Churches of Asia Minor Series One and Series Two in one Volume · 第 5 / 29 段