CHAPTER IV. THE GARMENT OF VEGETATION

No part of the world can be truly understood without a knowledge of its

garment of vegetation, for this determines not only the nature of the

animal inhabitants but also the occupations of the majority of

human beings. Although the soil has much to do with the character of

vegetation, climate has infinitely more. It is temperature which causes

the moss and lichens of the barren tundras in the far north to be

replaced by orchids, twining vines, and mahogany trees near the equator.

It is rainfall which determines that vigorous forests shall grow in the

Appalachians in latitudes where grasslands prevail in the plains and

deserts in the western cordillera.

Forests, grass-lands, deserts, represent the three chief types of

vegetation on the surface of the earth. Each is a response to certain

well-defined conditions of climate. Forests demand an abundance of

moisture throughout the entire season of growth. Where this season

lasts only three months the forest is very different from where it lasts

twelve. But no forest can be vigorous if the ground habitually becomes

dry for a considerable period during which the weather is warm enough

for growth. Desert vegetation, on the other hand, which consists

primarily of bushes with small, drought-resistant leaves, needs only a

few irregular and infrequent showers in order to endure long periods

of heat and drought. Discontinuity of moisture is the cause of deserts,

just as continuity is the necessary condition of forest growth. Grasses

prevail where the climatic conditions are intermediate between those of

the forest and the desert. Their primary requisite is a short period of

fairly abundant moisture with warmth enough to ripen their seeds. Unlike

the trees of the forests, they thrive even though the wet period be only

a fraction of the entire time that is warm enough for growth. Unlike

the bushes of the desert, they rarely thrive unless the ground is

well soaked for at least a few weeks. Most people think of forests as

offering far more variety than either deserts or grass-lands. To them

grass is just grass, while trees seem to possess individuality. In

reality, however, the short turfy grass of the far north differs from

the four-foot fronds of the bunchy saccaton grass of Arizona, and from

the far taller tufts of the plumed pampas grass, much more than the pine

tree differs from the palm. Deserts vary even more than either forests

or grass-lands. The traveler in the Arizona desert, for example, has

been jogging across a gravelly plain studded at intervals of a few yards

with little bushes a foot high. The scenery is so monotonous and the

noon sunshine so warm that he almost falls asleep. When he wakes from

his daydream, so weird are his surroundings that he thinks he must be in

one of the places to which Sindbad was carried by the roc. The trail has

entered an open forest of joshuas, as the big tree yuccas are called in

Arizona. Their shaggy trunks and uncouth branches are rendered doubly

unkempt by swordlike, ashy-yellow dead leaves that double back on the

trunk but refuse to fall to the ground. At a height of from twelve to

twenty feet each arm of the many-branched candelabrum ends in a stiff

rosette of gray-green spiky leaves as tough as hemp. Equally bizarre and

much more imposing is a desert "stand" of giant suhuaros, great fluted

tree-cacti thirty feet or more high. In spite of their size the suhuaros

are desert types as truly as is sagebrush.

In America the most widespread type of forest is the evergreen

coniferous woodland of the north. Its pines, firs, spruces, hemlocks,

and cedars which are really junipers, cover most of Canada together with

northern New England and the region south of Lakes Huron and Superior.

At its northern limit the forest looks thoroughly forlorn. The gnarled

and stunted trees are thickly studded with half-dead branches bent down

by the weight of snow, so that the lower ones sweep the ground, while

the upper look tired and discouraged from their struggle with an

inclement climate. Farther south, however, the forest loses this

aspect of terrific struggle. In Maine, for example, it gives a pleasant

impression of comfortable prosperity. Wherever the trees have room to

grow, they are full and stocky, and even where they are crowded together

their slender upspringing trunks look alert and energetic. The signs

of death and decay, indeed, appear everywhere in fallen trunks, dead

branches, and decayed masses of wood, but moss and lichens, twinflowers

and bunchberries so quickly mantle the prostrate trees that they do not

seem like tokens of weakness. Then, too, in every open space thousands

of young trees bank their soft green masses so gracefully that one has

an ever-present sense of pleased surprise as he comes upon this younger

foliage out of the dim aisles among the bigger trees.

Except on their southern borders the great northern forests are not good

as a permanent home for man. The snow lies so late in the spring and the

summers are so short and cool that agriculture does not prosper. As a

home for the fox, marten, weasel, beaver, and many other fur-bearing

animals, however, the coniferous forests are almost ideal. That is why

the Hudson's Bay Company is one of the few great organizations which

have persisted and prospered from colonial times to the present. As long

ago as 1670 Charles II granted to Prince Rupert and seventeen noblemen

and gentlemen a charter so sweeping that, aside from their own powers

of assimilation, there was almost no limit to what the "Governor and

Company of Adventurers of England trading into Hudson's Bay" might

acquire. By 1749, nearly eighty years after the granting of the charter,

however, the Company had only four or five forts on the coast of Hudson

Bay, with about 120 regular employees. Nevertheless the poor Indians

were so ignorant of the value of their furs and the consequent profits

were so large that, after Canada had been ceded to Great Britain in

1763, a rival organization, the Northwest Fur Company of Montreal, was

established. Then there began an era that was truly terrible for the

Indians of the northern forest. In their eagerness to get the valuable

furs the companies offered the Indians strong liquors in an abundance

that ruined the poor red man, body and soul. Moreover the fur-bearing

animals were killed not only in winter but during the breeding season.

Many mother animals were shot and their little ones were left to die.

Hence in a short time the wild creatures of the great northern forest

were so scarce that the Indians well-nigh starved.

In spite of this slaughter of fur-bearing animals, the same Company

still draws fat dividends from the northern forest and its furry

inhabitants. If the forest had been more habitable, it would long ago

have been occupied by settlers, as have its warmer, southern portions,

and the Company would have ceased to exist. Aside from the regions too

cold or too dry to support any vegetation whatever, few parts of the

world are more deadening to civilization than the forests of the far

north. Near the northern limit of the great evergreen forest of North

America wild animals are so rare that a family of hunting Indians can

scarcely find a living in a thousand square miles. Today the voracious

maw of the daily newspaper is eating the spruce and hemlock by means of

relentless saws and rattling pulp-mills. In the wake of the lumbermen

settlers are tardily spreading northward from the more favored tracts

in northern New England and southern Canada. Nevertheless most of the

evergreen forests of the north must always remain the home of wild

animals and trappers, a backward region in which it is easy for a great

fur company to maintain a practical monopoly.

Outliers of the pine forest extend far down into the United States. The

easternmost lies in part along the Appalachians and in part along the

coastal plain from southern New Jersey to Texas. The coastal forest

is unlike the other coniferous forests in two respects, for its

distribution and growth are not limited by long winters but by sandy

soil which quickly becomes dry. This drier southern pine forest lacks

the beauty of its northern companion. Its trees are often tall and

stately, but they are usually much scattered and are surrounded by

stretches of scanty grass. There is no trace of the mossy carpet and

dense copses of undergrowth that add so much to the picturesqueness of

the forests farther north. The unkempt half-breed or Indian hunter

is replaced by the prosaic gatherer of turpentine. As the man of the

southern forests shuffles along in blue or khaki overalls and carries

his buckets from tree to tree, he seems a dull figure contrasted with

the active northern hunter who glides swiftly and silently from trap to

trap on his rawhide snowshoes. Yet though the southern pine forest may

be less picturesque than the northern, it is more useful to man. In

spite of its sandy soil, much of this forest land is being reclaimed,

and all will some day probably be covered by farms.

Two other outliers of the northern evergreen forest extend southward

along the cool heights of the Rocky Mountains and of the Pacific coast

ranges of the United States. In the Olympic and Sierra Nevada ranges

the most western outlier of this northern band of vegetation probably

contains the most inspiring forests of the world. There grow the

vigorous Oregon pines, firs, and spruces, and the still more famous Big

Trees or sequoias. High on the sides of the Sierra above the yuccas, the

live oaks, and the deciduous forest of the lower slopes, one meets these

Big Trees. To come upon them suddenly after a long, rough tramp over

the sunny lower slopes is the experience of a lifetime. Upward the great

trees rise sheer one hundred feet without a branch. The huge fluted

trunks encased in soft, red bark six inches or a foot thick are

more impressive than the columns of the grandest cathedral. It seems

irreverent to speak above a whisper. Each tree is a new wonder. One has

to walk around it and study it to appreciate its enormous size. Where a

tree chances to stand isolated so that one can see its full majesty, the

sense of awe is tempered by the feeling that in spite of their size the

trees have a beauty all their own. Lifted to such heights, the branches

appear to be covered with masses of peculiarly soft and rounded foliage

like the piled-up banks of a white cumulus cloud before a thunderstorm.

At the base of such a tree the eye is caught by the sharp, triangular

outline of one of its young progeny. The lower branches sweep the

ground. The foliage is harsh and rough. In almost no other species of

trees is there such a change from comparatively ungraceful youth to a

superbly beautiful old age.

The second great type of American forest is deciduous. The trees have

broad leaves quite unlike the slender needles or overlapping scales of

the northern evergreens. Each winter such forests shed their leaves.

Among the mountains where the frosts come suddenly, the blaze of glory

and brilliance of color which herald the shedding of the leaves are

surpassed in no other part of the world. Even the colors of the Painted

Desert in northern Arizona and the wonderful flowers of the California

plains are less pleasing. In the Painted Desert the patches of red,

yellow, gray-blue, white, pale green, and black have a garish, almost

repellent appearance. In California the flame-colored acres of poppies

in some places, of white or yellow daisylike flowers in others, or of

purple blossoms elsewhere have a softer expression than the bare soil

of the desert. Yet they lack the delicate blending and harmony of colors

which is the greatest charm of the autumn foliage in the deciduous

forests. Even where the forests consist of such trees as birches,

beeches, aspens, or sycamores, whose leaves merely turn yellow in the

fall, the contrast between this color and the green tint of summer or

the bare branches of winter adds a spice of variety which is lacking in

other and more monotonous forests.

From still other points of view the deciduous forest has an almost

unequaled degree of variety. In one place it consists of graceful little

birches whose white trunks shimmering in the twilight form just the

background for ghosts. Contrast them with the oak forest half a mile

away. There the sense of gracefulness gives place to a feeling of

strength. The lines are no longer vertical but horizontal. The knotted

elbows of the branches recall the keels of sturdy merchantmen of bygone

days. The acorns under foot suggest food for the herds of half-wild pigs

which roam among the trees in many a southern county. Of quite another

type are the stately forests of the Appalachians where splendid magnolia

and tulip trees spread their broad limbs aloft at heights of one hundred

feet or more.

Deciduous forests grow in the well-balanced regions where summer and

winter approach equality, where neither is unduly long, and where

neither is subject to prolonged drought. They extend southward from

central New England, the Great Lakes, and Minnesota, to Mississippi,

Arkansas, and eastern Texas. They predominate even in parts of such

prairie States as Michigan, Indiana, southern Illinois, and southeastern

Missouri. No part of the continent is more populous or more progressive

than the regions once covered by deciduous forests. In the United States

nearly sixty per cent of the inhabitants live in areas reclaimed from

such forests. Yet the area of the forests is less than a quarter of the

three million square miles that make up the United States.

In their relation to human life the forests of America differ far more

than do either grass-lands or deserts. In the far north, as we have

seen, the pine forests furnish one of the least favorable environments.

In middle latitudes the deciduous forests go to the opposite extreme

and furnish the most highly favored of the homes of man. Still farther

southward the increasing luxuriance of the forests, especially along

the Atlantic coast, renders them less and less favorable to mankind. In

southern Mexico and Yucatan the stately equatorial rain forest, the most

exuberant of all types of vegetation and the most unconquerable by man,

makes its appearance. It forms a discontinuous belt along the wet east

coast and on the lower slopes of the mountains from southern Yucatan to

Venezuela. Then it is interrupted by the grasslands of the Orinoco, but

revives again in still greater magnificence in the Guianas. Thence

it stretches not only along the coast but far into the little known

interior of the Great Amazon basin, while southward it borders all the

coast as far as southern Brazil. In the Amazon basin it reaches its

highest development and becomes the crowning glory of the vegetable

world, the most baffling obstacle to human progress.

Except in its evil effects on man, the equatorial rain forest is the

antithesis of the forests of the extreme north. The equatorial trees are

hardwood giants, broad leaved, bright flowered, and often fruit-bearing.

The northern trees are softwood dwarfs, needle-leaved, flowerless, and

cone-bearing. The equatorial trees are often branchless for one hundred

feet, but spread at the top into a broad overarching canopy which shuts

out the sun perpetually. The northern trees form sharp little pyramids

with low, widely spreading branches at the base and only short twigs at

the top. In the equatorial forests there is almost no underbrush. The

animals, such as monkeys, snakes, parrots, and brilliant insects, live

chiefly in the lofty treetops. In the northern forests there is almost

nothing except underbrush, and the foxes, rabbits, weasels, ptarmigans,

and mosquitoes live close to the ground in the shelter of the branches.

Both forests are alike, however, in being practically uninhabited by

man. Each is peopled only by primitive nomadic hunters who stand at the

very bottom in the scale of civilization.

Aside from the rain forest there are two other types in tropical

countries--jungle and scrub. The distinction between rain forest,

jungle, and scrub is due to the amount and the season of rainfall. An

understanding of this distinction not only explains many things in

the present condition of Latin America but also in the history of

pre-Columbian Central America. Forests, as we have seen, require that

the ground be moist throughout practically the whole of the season that

is warm enough for growth. Since the warm season lasts throughout the

year within the tropics, dense forests composed of uniformly large trees

corresponding to our oaks, maples, and beeches will not thrive unless

the ground is wet most of the time. Of course there may be no rain for a

few weeks, but there must be no long and regularly recurrent periods of

drought. Smaller trees and such species as the cocoanut palm are much

less exacting and will flourish even if there is a dry period of several

months. Still smaller, bushy species will thrive even when the rainfall

lasts only two or three months. Hence where the rainy season lasts most

of the year, rain forest prevails; where the rainy and dry seasons do

not differ greatly in length, tropical jungle is the dominant growth;

and where the rainy season is short and the dry season long, the jungle

degenerates into scrub or bush.

The relation of scrub, jungle, and rain forest is well illustrated in

Yucatan, where the ancient Mayas reared their stately temples. On the

northern coast the annual rainfall is only ten or fifteen inches and is

concentrated largely in our summer months. There the country is covered

with scrubby bushes six to ten feet high. These are beautifully green

during the rainy season from June to October, but later in the year

lose almost all their leaves. The landscape would be much like that of

a thick, bushy pasture in the United States at the same season, were

it not that in the late winter and early spring some of the bushes bear

brilliant red, yellow, or white flowers. As one goes inland from the

north coast of Yucatan the rainfall increases. The bushes become taller

and denser, trees twenty feet high become numerous, and many rise thirty

or forty feet or even higher. This is the jungle. Its smaller portions

suggest a second growth of timber in the deciduous forests of the United

States fifteen or twenty years after the cutting of the original forest,

but here there is much more evidence of rapid growth. A few species of

bushes and trees may remain green throughout the year, but during the

dry season most of the jungle plants lose their leaves, at least in

part.

With every mile that one advances into the more rainy interior, the

jungle becomes greener and fresher, the density of the lower growths

increases, and the proportion of large trees becomes greater until

finally jungle gives place to genuine forest. There many of the trees

remain green throughout the year. They rise to heights of fifty or sixty

feet even on the borders of their province, and at the top form a canopy

so thick that the ground is shady most of the time. Even in the drier

part of the year when some of the leaves have fallen, the rays of the

sun scarcely reach the ground until nine or ten o'clock in the morning.

Even at high noon the sunlight straggles through only in small patches.

Long, sinuous lianas, often queerly braided, hang down from the trees;

epiphytes and various parasitic growths add their strange green and red

to the complex variety of vegetation. Young palms grow up almost in

a day and block a trail which was hewn out with much labor only a few

months before. Wherever the death of old trees forms an opening, a

thousand seedlings begin a fierce race to reach the light. Everywhere

the dominant note is intensely vigorous life, rapid growth, and quick

decay.

In their effect on man, the three forms of tropical forest are very

different. In the genuine rain forest agriculture is almost impossible.

Not only does the poor native find himself baffled in the face of

Nature, but the white man is equally at a loss. Many things combine to

produce this result. Chief among them are malaria and other tropical

diseases. When a few miles of railroad were being built through a

strip of tropical forest along the coast of eastern Guatemala, it was

impossible to keep the laborers more than twenty days at a time; indeed,

unless they were sent away at the end of three weeks, they were almost

sure to be stricken with virulent malarial fevers from which many died.

An equally potent enemy of agriculture is the vegetation itself. Imagine

the difficulty of cultivating a garden in a place where the weeds grow

all the time and where many of them reach a height of ten or twenty

feet in a single year. Perhaps there are people in the world who might

cultivate such a region and raise marvelous crops, but they are not the

indolent people of tropical America; and it is in fact doubtful whether

any kind of people could live permanently in the tropical forest and

retain energy enough to carry on cultivation. Nowhere in the world is

there such steady, damp heat as in these shadowy, windless depths

far below the lofty tops of the rain forest. Nowhere is there greater

disinclination to work than among the people who dwell in this region.

Consequently in the vast rain forests of the Amazon basin and in

similar small forests as far north as Central America, there are today

practically no inhabitants except a mere handful of the poorest and most

degraded people in the world. Yet in ancient times the northern border

of the rain forest was the seat of America's most advanced civilization.

The explanation of this contradiction will appear later. *

* See Chapter 5, Aztecs.

Tropical jungle borders the rain forest all the way from southern Mexico

to southern Brazil. It treats man far better than does the rain forest.

In marked contrast to its more stately neighbor, it contains abundant

game. Wild fruits ripen at almost all seasons. A few banana plants and

palm trees will well-nigh support a family. If corn is planted in a

clearing, the return is large in proportion to the labor. So long as

the population is not too dense, life is so easy that there is little to

stimulate progress. Hence, although the people of the jungle are

fairly numerous, they have never played much part in history. Far more

important is the role of those living in the tropical lands where scrub

is the prevailing growth. In our day, for example, few tropical lowlands

are more progressive than the narrow coastal strip of northern Yucatan.

There on the border between jungle and scrub the vegetation does not

thrive sufficiently to make life easy for the chocolate-colored natives.

Effort is required if they would make a living, yet the effort is not

so great as to be beyond the capacity of the indolent people of the

tropics.

Leaving the forests, let us step out into the broad, breezy grass-lands.

One would scarcely expect that a journey poleward out of the forest of

northern Canada would lead to an improvement in the conditions of human

life, yet such is the case. Where the growing season becomes so short

that even the hardiest trees disappear, grassy tundras replace the

forest. By furnishing food for such animals as the musk-ox, they are a

great help to the handful of scattered Indians who dwell on the northern

edge of the forest. In summer, when the animals grow fat on the short

nutritious grass, the Indians follow them out into the open country and

hunt them vigorously for food and skins to sustain life through the long

dreary winter. In many cases the hunters would advance much farther into

the grass-lands were it not that the abundant musk-oxen tempt the Eskimo

of the seacoast also to leave their homes and both sides fear bloody

encounters.

With the growth of civilization the advantage of the northern

grass-lands over the northern forests becomes still more apparent. The

domestic reindeer is beginning to replace the wild musk-ox. The

reindeer people, like the Indian and Eskimo hunters, must be nomadic.

Nevertheless their mode of life permits them to live in much greater

numbers and on a much higher plane of civilization than the hunters.

Since they hunt the furbearing animals in the neighboring forests during

the winter, they diminish the food supply of the hunters who dwell

permanently in the forest, and thus make their life still more

difficult. The northern forests bid fair to decline in population rather

than increase. In this New World of ours, strange as it may seem, the

almost uninhabited forest regions of the far north and of the equator

are probably more than twice as large as the desert areas with equally

sparse population.

South of the tundras the grass-lands have a still greater advantage over

the forests. In the forest region of the Laurentian highland abundant

snow lasts far into the spring and keeps the ground so wet and cold that

no crops can be raised. Moreover, because of the still greater abundance

of snow in former times, the largest of ice sheets, as we have seen,

accumulated there during the Glacial Period and scraped away most of

the soil. The grassy plains, on the contrary, are favored not only by

a deep, rich soil, much of which was laid down by the ice, but by the

relative absence of snow in winter and the consequent rapidity with

which the ground becomes warm in the spring. Hence the Canadian plains

from the United States boundary northward to latitude 57 degrees contain

a prosperous agricultural population of over a million people, while

the far larger forested areas in the same latitude support only a few

thousand.

The question is often asked why, in a state of nature, trees are so

scarce on the prairies--in Iowa, for instance--although they thrive

when planted. In answer we are often told that up to the middle of the

nineteenth century such vast herds of buffaloes roamed the prairies that

seedling trees could never get a chance to grow. It is also said that

prairie fires sweeping across the plains destroyed the little trees

whenever they sprouted. Doubtless the buffaloes and the fires helped

to prevent forest growth, but another factor appears to be still more

important. All the States between the Mississippi River and the Rocky

Mountains receive much more rain in summer than in winter. But as the

soil is comparatively dry in the spring when the trees begin their

growth, they are handicapped. They could grow if nothing else interfered

with them, just as peas will grow in a garden if the weeds are kept out.

If peas, however, are left uncared for, the weeds gain the upper hand

and there are no peas the second year. If the weeds are left to contend

with grass, the grass in the end prevails. In the eastern forest region,

if the grass be left to itself, small trees soon spring up in its midst.

In half a century a field of grass goes back to forest because trees

are especially favored by the climate. In the same way in the prairies,

grass is especially favored, for it is not weakened by the spring

drought, and it grows abundantly until it forms the wonderful stretches

of waving green where the buffalo once grew fat. Moreover the fine

glacial soil of the prairies is so clayey and compact that the roots of

trees cannot easily penetrate it. Since grasses send their roots only

into the more friable upper layers of soil, they possess another great

advantage over the trees.

Far to the south of the prairies lie the grass-lands of tropical

America, of which the Banos of the Orinoco furnish a good example.

Almost everywhere their plumed grasses have been left to grow

undisturbed by the plough, and even grazing animals are scarce. These

extremely flat plains are flooded for months in the rainy season from

May to October and are parched in the dry season that follows. As

trees cannot endure such extremes, grasses are the prevailing growth.

Elsewhere the nature of the soil causes many other grassy tracts to

be scattered among the tropical jungle and forest. Trees are at a

disadvantage both in porous, sandy soils, where the water drains away

too rapidly, and in clayey soil, where it is held so long that the

ground is saturated for weeks or months at a time. South of the tropical

portion of South America the vast pampas of Argentina closely resemble

the North American prairies and the drier plains to the west of

them. Grain in the east and cattle in the west are fast causing the

disappearance of those great tussocks of tufted grasses eight or nine

feet high which hold among grasses a position analogous to that of the

Big Trees of California among trees of lower growth.

It is often said that America has no real deserts. This is true in the

sense that there are no regions such as are found in Asia and Africa

where one can travel a hundred miles at a stretch and scarcely see a

sign of vegetation-nothing but barren gravel, graceful wavy sand dunes,

hard wind-swept clay, or still harder rock salt broken into rough blocks

with upturned edges. In the broader sense of the term, however, America

has an abundance of deserts--regions which bear a thin cover of bushy

vegetation but are too dry for agriculture without irrigation. On the

north such deserts begin in southern Canada where a dry region abounding

in small salt lakes lies at the eastern base of the Rocky Mountains.

In the United States the deserts lie almost wholly between the Sierra

Nevada and the Rocky Mountain ranges, which keep out any moisture that

might come from either the west or the east. Beginning on the north with

the sagebrush plateau of southern Washington, the desert expands to a

width of seven hundred miles in the gray, sage-covered basins of Nevada

and Utah. In southern California and Arizona the sage-brush gives place

to smaller forms like the saltbush, and the desert assumes a sterner

aspect. Next comes the cactus desert extending from Arizona far south

into Mexico. One of the notable features of the desert is the extreme

heat of certain portions. Close to the Nevada border in southern

California, Death Valley, 250 feet below sea-level, is the hottest

place in America. There alone among the American regions familiar to the

writer does one have that feeling of intense, overpowering aridity which

prevails so often in the deserts of Arabia and Central Asia. Some

years ago a Weather Bureau thermometer was installed in Death Valley at

Furnace Creek, where the only flowing water in more than a hundred miles

supports a depressing little ranch. There one or two white men, helped

by a few Indians, raise alfalfa, which they sell at exorbitant prices to

deluded prospectors searching for riches which they never find. Though

the terrible heat ruins the health of the white men in a year or two,

so that they have to move away, they have succeeded in keeping

a thermometer record for some years. No other properly exposed,

out-of-door thermometer in the United States, or perhaps in the world,

is so familiar with a temperature of 100 degrees F. or more. During the

period of not quite fifteen hundred days from the spring of 1911 to May,

1915, a maximum temperature of 100 degrees F. or more was reached on

five hundred and forty-eight days, or more than one-third of the time.

On July 10, 1913, the mercury rose to 134 degrees F. and touched the top

of the tube. How much higher it might have gone no one can tell. That

day marks the limit of temperature yet reached in this country according

to official records. In the summer of 1914 there was one night when the

thermometer dropped only to 114 degrees F., having been 128 degrees

F. at noon. The branches of a peppertree whose roots had been freshly

watered wilted as a flower wilts when broken from the stalk.

East and south of Death Valley lies the most interesting section of the

American desert, the so-called succulent desert of southern Arizona and

northern Mexico. There in greatest profusion grow the cacti, perhaps the

latest and most highly specialized of all the great families of plants.

There occur such strange scenes as the "forests" of suhuaros, whose

giant columns have already been described. Their beautiful crowns of

large white flowers produce a fruit which is one of the mainstays of the

Papagos and other Indians of the regions. In this same region the yucca

is highly developed, and its tall stalks of white or greenish flowers

make the desert appear like a flower garden. In fact this whole

desert, thanks to light rains in summer as well as winter, appears

extraordinarily green and prosperous. Its fair appearance has deceived

many a poor settler who has vainly tried to cultivate it.

Farther south the deserts of America are largely confined to plateaus

like those of Mexico and Peru or to basins sheltered on all sides from

rain-bearing winds. In such basins the suddenness of the transition

from one type of vegetation to another is astonishing. In Guatemala,

for instance, the coast is bordered by thick jungle which quickly gives

place to magnificent rain forest a few miles inland. This continues

two or three score miles from the coast until a point is reached where

mountains begin to obstruct the rain-bearing trade-winds. At once the

rain forest gives place to jungle; in a few miles jungle in its turn

is replaced by scrub; and shortly the scrub degenerates to mere desert

bush. Then in another fifty miles one rises to the main plateau passing

once more through scrub. This time the scrub gives place to grass-lands

diversified by deciduous trees and pines which give the country a

distinctly temperate aspect. On such plateaus the chief civilization of

the tropical Latin-American countries now centers. In the past, however,

the plateaus were far surpassed by the Maya lowlands of Yucatan and

Guatemala.

We are wont to think of deserts as places where the plants are of few

kinds and not much crowded. As a matter of fact, an ordinary desert

supports a much greater variety of plants than does either a forest or

a prairie. The reason is simple. Every desert contains wet spots near

springs or in swamps. Such places abound with all sorts of water-loving

plants. The deserts also contain a few valleys where the larger streams

keep the ground moist at all seasons. In such places the variety of

trees is as great as in many forests. Moreover almost all deserts have

short periods of abundant moisture.

At such times the seeds of all sorts of little annual plants, including

grasses, daisies, lupines, and a host of others, sprout quickly, and

give rise to a carpet of vegetation as varied and beautiful as that of

the prairie. Thus the desert has not only its own peculiar bushes and

succulents but many of the products of vegetation in swamps, grasslands,

and forests. Though much of the ground is bare in the desert, the plants

are actually crowded together as closely as possible. The showers of

such regions are usually so brief that they merely wet the surface. At

a depth of a foot or more the soil of many deserts never becomes moist

from year's end to year's end. It is useless for plants to send their

roots deep down under such circumstances, for they might not reach water

for a hundred feet. Their only recourse is to spread horizontally. The

farther they spread, the more water they can absorb after the scanty

showers. Hence the plants of the desert throttle one another by

extending their roots horizontally, just as those of the forest kill one

another by springing rapidly upward and shutting out the light.

Vegetation, whether in forests, grasslands, or deserts, is the primary

source of human sustenance. Without it man would perish miserably; and

where it is deficient, he cannot rise to great heights in the scale of

civilization. Yet strangely enough the scantiness of the vegetation of

the deserts was a great help in the ascent of man. Only in dry regions

could primitive man compete with nature in fostering the right kind

of vegetation. In such regions arose the nations which first practised

agriculture. There man became comparatively civilized while his

contemporaries were still nomadic hunters in the grasslands and the

forests.

The Red Man's Continent: A Chronicle of Aboriginal America · 第 4 / 5 章