Sec. 3

Now that I have been searching my memory, I incline rather more than I

did to the opinion that the bare suggestion at any rate of this

particular Book did come from me. I probably went to Boon soon after

this talk with Dodd and said a fine book might be written about the

Mind of Humanity, and in all likelihood I gave some outline--I have

forgotten what. I wanted a larger picture of that great Being his

imagination had struck out. I remember at any, rate Boon taking me

into his study, picking out Goldsmith's "Inquiry into the Present

State of Polite Learning," turning it over and reading from it.

"Something in this line?" he said, and read:

"'Complaints of our degeneracy in literature as well as in

morals I own have been frequently exhibited of late.... The

dullest critic who strives at a reputation for delicacy, by

showing he cannot be pleased ...'

"The old, old thing, you see! The weak protest of the living."

He turned over the pages. "He shows a proper feeling, but he's a

little thin.... He says some good things. But--'The age of Louis XIV,

notwithstanding these respectable names, is still vastly, superior.'

Is it? Guess the respectable names that age of Louis XIV could

override!--Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Montesquieu, D'Alembert! And

now tell me the respectable names of the age of Louis XIV. And the

conclusion of the whole matter--

"'Thus the man who, under the patronage of the great might

have done honour to humanity, when only patronized by the

bookseller becomes a thing a little superior to the fellow who

works at the press.'

"'The patronage of the great'! 'Fellow who works at the press'!

Goldsmith was a damnably genteel person at times in spite of the

'Vicar'! It's printed with the long 's,' you see. It all helps to

remind one that times have changed." ...

I followed his careless footsteps into the garden; he went

gesticulating before me, repeating, "'An Inquiry into the State of

Polite Learning'! That's what your 'Mind of the Race' means. Suppose

one did it now, we should do it differently in every way, from that."

"Yes, but how should we do it?" said I.

The project had laid hold upon me. I wanted a broad outline of the

whole apparatus of thinking and determination in the modern State;

something that should bring together all its various activities, which

go on now in a sort of deliberate ignorance of one another, which

would synthesize research, education, philosophical discussion, moral

training, public policy. "There is," I said, "a disorganized abundance

now."

"It's a sort of subconscious mind," said Boon, seeming to take me

quite seriously, "with a half instinctive will...."

We discussed what would come into the book. One got an impression of

the enormous range and volume of intellectual activity that pours

along now, in comparison with the jejune trickle of Goldsmith's days.

Then the world had--what? A few English writers, a few men in France,

the Royal Society, the new Berlin Academy (conducting its transactions

in French), all resting more or less upon the insecure patronage of

the "Great"; a few schools, public and private, a couple of dozen of

universities in all the world, a press of which _The Gentleman's

Magazine_ was the brightest ornament. Now----

It is a curious thing that it came to us both as a new effect, this

enormously greater size of the intellectual world of to-day. We didn't

at first grasp the implications of that difference, we simply found it

necessitated an enlargement of our conception. "And then a man's

thoughts lived too in a world that had been created, lock, stock, and

barrel, a trifle under six thousand years ago!..."

We fell to discussing the range and divisions of our subject. The main

stream, we settled, was all that one calls "literature" in its broader

sense. We should have to discuss that principally. But almost as

important as the actual development of ideas, suggestions, ideals, is

the way they are distributed through the body of humanity, developed,

rendered, brought into touch with young minds and fresh minds, who are

drawn so into participation, who themselves light up and become new

thoughts. One had to consider journalism, libraries, book

distribution, lecturing, teaching. Then there is the effect of laws,

of inventions.... "Done in a large, dull, half-abstract way," said

Boon, "one might fill volumes. One might become an Eminent

Sociologist. You might even invent terminology. It's a chance----"

We let it pass. He went on almost at once to suggest a more congenial

form, a conversational novel. I followed reluctantly. I share the

general distrust of fiction as a vehicle of discussion. We would, he

insisted, invent a personality who would embody our Idea, who should

be fanatically obsessed by this idea of the Mind of the Race, who

should preach it on all occasions and be brought into illuminating

contact with all the existing mental apparatus and organization of the

world. "Something of your deep, moral earnestness, you know, only a

little more presentable and not quite so vindictive," said Boon, "and

without your--lapses. I seem to see him rather like Leo Maxse: the

same white face, the same bright eyes, the same pervading suggestion

of nervous intensity, the same earnest, quasi-reasonable voice--but

instead of that anti-German obsession of his, an intelligent passion

for the racial thought. He must be altogether a fanatic. He must think

of the Mind of the Race in season and out of season. Collective

thought will be no joke to him; it will be the supremely important

thing. He will be passionately a patriot, entirely convinced of your

proposition that 'the thought of a community is the life of a

community,' and almost as certain that the tide of our thought is

ebbing."

"Is it?" said I.

"I've never thought. The 'Encyclopaedia Britannica' says it is."

"We must call the 'Encyclopaedia Britannica.'"

"As a witness--in the book--rather! But, anyhow, this man of ours will

believe it and struggle against it. It will make him ill; it will

spoil the common things of life for him altogether. I seem to see him

interrupting some nice, bright, clean English people at tennis. 'Look

here, you know,' he will say, 'this is all very well. But have you

_thought_ to-day? They tell me the Germans are thinking, the

Japanese.' I see him going in a sort of agony round and about

Canterbury Cathedral. 'Here are all these beautiful, tranquil

residences clustering round this supremely beautiful thing, all these

well-dressed, excellent, fresh-coloured Englishmen in their beautiful

clerical raiment--deans, canons--and what have they _thought_, any of

them? I keep my ear to the _Hibbert Journal_, but is it enough?'

Imagine him going through London on an omnibus. He will see as clear

as the advertisements on the hoardings the signs of the formal

breaking up of the old Victorian Church of England and Dissenting

cultures that have held us together so long. He will see that the

faith has gone, the habits no longer hold, the traditions lie lax like

cut string--there is nothing to replace these things. People do this

and that dispersedly; there is democracy in beliefs even, and any

notion is as good as another. And there is America. Like a burst

Haggis. Intellectually. The Mind is confused, the Race in the violent

ferment of new ideas, in the explosive development of its own

contrivances, has lost its head. It isn't thinking any more; it's

stupefied one moment and the next it's diving about----

"It will be as clear as day to him that a great effort of intellectual

self-control must come if the race is to be saved from utter confusion

and dementia. And nobody seems to see it but he. He will go about

wringing his hands, so to speak. I fancy him at last at a

writing-desk, nervous white fingers clutched in his black hair. 'How

can I put it so that they _must_ attend and see?'"

So we settled on our method and principal character right away. But we

got no farther because Boon insisted before doing anything else on

drawing a fancy portrait of this leading character of ours and

choosing his name. We decided to call him Hallery, and that he should

look something like this--

[Illustration: _Hallery preparing to contradict._]

That was how "The Mind of the Race" began, the book that was to have

ended at last in grim burlesque with Hallery's murder of Dr. Tomlinson

Keyhole in his villa at Hampstead, and the conversation at dawn with

that incredulous but literate policeman at Highgate--he was reading a

World's Classic--to whom Hallery gave himself up.

Boon, The Mind of the Race, The Wild Asses of the Devil, and The Last Trump; Being a First Selection from the Literary Remains of George Boon, Appropriate to the Times · 第 18 / 96 题